--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Dean Goodman wrote:
Dear Fairfield Lifers,
CONCLUSION:
(2) Will Maharishi be remembered, if at all, as crazy or
foolish or lying?
(1) Or will he be remembered as the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Dean Goodman wrote:
Dear Fairfield Lifers,
CONCLUSION:
(2) Will Maharishi be remembered, if at all, as crazy or foolish or
lying?
(1) Or will he be remembered as the saintly warrior who successfully
changed the mind of Kali
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, if I feel a general
hostility to any Bhakti attitude, once it comes up,
it's simply my perception over the years.
Cool. That and a buck-fifty will get you a bad cup of
coffee at Starbucks.
Show me one post, just
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
Irmeli.Mattsson@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
Irmeli.Mattsson@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Dean Goodman
Tantra@ wrote:
The trends of time are
being changed; Kali herself is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
The biggest drug problem facing the world today
is not cocaine or heroin, but testosterone.
That's right, and, the problem is in the shortage.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The biggest drug problem facing the world today
is not cocaine or heroin, but testosterone.
A confession of stark honesty; particularly if the author is male. To
have internalized such a belief exposes oneÕs obedience to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mrfishey2001
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
The biggest drug problem facing the world today
is not cocaine or heroin, but testosterone.
A confession of stark honesty; particularly if the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Generally I dislike in this post the tone of idealizing one person's
work, and the egoistic approach of trying to make his work crucial to
human consciousness evolution in this time.
You *dislike* it right?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
Irmeli.Mattsson@ wrote:
Generally I dislike in this post the tone of idealizing one
person's work, and the egoistic approach of trying to make
his work crucial
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it assumes only that men and women are
stupid in different ways. The ways in which women
tend to be stupid are proabaly no *less* stupid than
the ways in which men tend to be stupid, but women's
ways of being
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mrfishey2001
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
I think it assumes only that men and women are
stupid in different ways. The ways in which women
tend to be stupid are proabaly no *less* stupid
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
Irmeli.Mattsson@ wrote:
Generally I dislike in this post the tone of idealizing one
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe first learn reading what a person actually has said, and don't
just dump on him once he appears. Once more: my post is not about the
difference of opinions about Maharishi that Michael and Irmeli have,
but about
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
fairfieldlife@ wrote:
on 3/7/06 5:43 PM, sparaig at sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
fairfieldlife@
wrote:
on 3/7/06
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@
wrote:
on 3/7/06 4:17 PM, Irmeli Mattsson at Irmeli.Mattsson@ wrote:
And I also agree that simultaneously with these tendencies he
has been
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Irmeli Mattsson
Irmeli.Mattsson@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Dean Goodman
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
Maybe first learn reading what a person actually has said,
and don't just dump on him once he appears. Once more: my
post is not about the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson nelsonriddle2001@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
The biggest drug problem facing the world today
is not cocaine or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it assumes only that men and women are
stupid in different ways. The ways in which women
tend to be stupid are proabaly no *less* stupid than
the ways in which men tend to be stupid, but women's
ways of being
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mrfishey2001
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
I think it assumes only that men and women are
stupid in different ways. The ways in which women
tend to be stupid are proabaly no *less* stupid than
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
Maybe first learn reading what a person actually has said,
and don't just dump
On Mar 8, 2006, at 2:12 PM, t3rinity wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
Maybe first learn reading what a person
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This kind of Bhakti? Is addiction or attachment to Bhakti considered
desirable?
http://www.polyamoryonline.org/interviews/poly_interview_120905.html
So far I have no idea of the tantric views of Michael. I will read the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Men and women are also smart. Stupid and smart coexist
in human beings.
2. *Some* of the stupidity is gender-specific; other aspects
of both stupidity and smartness is universal.
3. A woman's stupidity is *different*
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Now
suddenly everybody here is full of respect for bhakti, why otherwise
this topic *never* comes up in any of your or Irmelis posts. Love of
Guru, appreciation of a teaching, dedication to a certain cause is
without
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This kind of Bhakti? Is addiction or attachment to Bhakti considered
desirable?
http://www.polyamoryonline.org/interviews/poly_interview_120905.html
Here is a really good article on Guru Bhakti by a man who knows what
he
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
snip
Now
suddenly everybody here is full of respect for bhakti, why otherwise
this topic *never* comes up in any of your or Irmelis posts. Love of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mrfishey2001
mrfishey2001@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
I think it assumes only that men and women are
stupid in different ways.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 8, 2006, at 2:12 PM, t3rinity wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
snip
This kind of Bhakti? Is addiction or attachment to Bhakti
considered desirable?
http://www.polyamoryonline.org/interviews/poly_interview_120905.html
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
snip
Now
suddenly everybody here is full of respect for bhakti, why
otherwise this topic *never* comes up in any of your or
Irmelis posts. Love of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
snip
Now
suddenly everybody here is full of respect for bhakti, why
otherwise
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@
wrote:
snip
Now
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both you and Michael do. I don't think that either
of you are nearly as comfortable or secure in your
beliefs as you claim to be. If you were, you
wouldn't spend so much of your time defending
against imagined attacks
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
snip
This kind of Bhakti? Is addiction or attachment to Bhakti
considered desirable?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
snip
Now
suddenly everybody here is full of respect for bhakti, why
otherwise
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Dean Goodman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
big snip
These money-controllers drain half of the creative intelligence off
the face of the Earth through their money schemes; they play let's
you and him fight with nations and foster wars for their own
The more words it takes someone to defend something,
the more likely it is that what they're defending
is indefensible.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Dean Goodman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Fairfield Lifers,
In response to the recent discussions on this list about the TM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The more words it takes someone to defend something,
the more likely it is that what they're defending
is indefensible.
Especially to those who find simplistic, black-and-
white arguments and shallow, empty aphorisms
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Dean Goodman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Fairfield Lifers,
In response to the recent discussions on this list about
the TM course fee [Why does T/M cost so much to join? A
little help?], I'll re-post my controversial essay from
a few
Speaking of free meditation techniques, here is a list of the places Amma's
IAM meditation is being taught. This page is updated constantly as new
courses are organized. There is sometimes a small fee to cover meals or the
instructors travel: http://www.amma.org/events/iam.html
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of free meditation techniques, here is a list of
the places Amma's IAM meditation is being taught. This
page is updated constantly as new courses are organized.
There is sometimes a small fee to cover
on 3/6/06 12:59 PM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of free meditation techniques, here is a list of
the places Amma's IAM meditation is being taught. This
page is updated constantly as new courses
Think I'll wait for the Readers Digest condensed version. :-)
On Mar 6, 2006, at 1:19 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
The more words it takes someone to defend something,
the more likely it is that what they're defending
is indefensible.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Dean Goodman
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The more words it takes someone to defend something,
the more likely it is that what they're defending
is indefensible.
The oral equivalent to that is:
weak point, speak louder!
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Dean Goodman
Tantra@ wrote:
Dear Fairfield Lifers,
In response to the recent discussions on this list about
the TM course fee [Why does T/M cost so much to join?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Think I'll wait for the Readers Digest condensed version. :-)
That's just because you're a sucker for simplistic,
black-and-white arguments and shallow, empty aphorisms,
Vaj. If you were truly evolved like some people, you'd
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Dean Goodman
Tantra@ wrote:
Dear Fairfield Lifers,
In response to the recent discussions on this list about
the TM course fee [Why does T/M cost so much to join?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
Think I'll wait for the Readers Digest condensed version. :-)
That's just because you're a sucker for simplistic,
black-and-white arguments and shallow,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
Think I'll wait for the Readers Digest condensed version. :-)
That's just because
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_astute_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Dean Goodman
Tantra@ wrote:
Dear Fairfield Lifers,
In response to the recent
On Mar 6, 2006, at 2:20 PM, anon_astute_ff wrote:An insight that may be useful in this discussion is what economists refer to as "consumer surplus". It is the difference between what a consumer is willing to pay for a good or service, and the actual market price. For example, I may be willing to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 6, 2006, at 2:22 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
Think I'll wait for the Readers
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rather than trying to start a new argument, why don't
you just tell us what you thing about Michael's article?
Are you out of your friggin' MIND, Vaj? When
Judy decides to tell us what she thinks about
a post, it tends to be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_astute_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Dean Goodman
Tantra@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 6, 2006, at 2:20 PM, anon_astute_ff wrote:
An insight that may be useful in this discussion is what economists
refer to as consumer surplus. It is the difference between what a
consumer is willing to pay for a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Dean Goodman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a very thoughtful essay, which I think I saw the first time round.
For a long time I too mistakenly thought that a priority goal was to
make TM available widely, in order to generate support for its
teachers
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_astute_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_astute_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
On Mar 6, 2006, at 2:40 PM, anon_astute_ff wrote:Yes, that is the point -- $2500 + of value for $200, yielding $2300+ of consumer sruplus. IF you percieve SSRS's Sahaja meditation as eqivalent to TM. btw I think the AOL course where the breathing is taught, is a seperate course from the Sahaja
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 6, 2006, at 2:40 PM, anon_astute_ff wrote:
Yes, that is the point -- $2500 + of value for $200, yielding $2300+
of consumer sruplus. IF you percieve SSRS's Sahaja meditation as
eqivalent to TM.
btw I think
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Dean Goodman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Fairfield Lifers,
In response to the recent discussions on this list about the TM
course
fee [Why does T/M cost so much to join? A little help?], I'll re-post
my controversial essay from a few years
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
fairfieldlife@ wrote:
Speaking of free meditation techniques, here is a list of
the places Amma's IAM meditation is being taught. This
page is updated
Um, are you sure you're being sufficiently respectful? :)
If not, the price for you to be a re-certified TB just went up to $5000--cash only.
Sal
On Mar 6, 2006, at 1:16 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Think I'll wait for the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_astute_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_astute_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
This is it. If Michael really wanted to sock it to us, it would have been twice as long.
Even the title on this one takes up about 5 KBs.
Sal
On Mar 6, 2006, at 12:35 PM, Vaj wrote:
Think I'll wait for the Readers Digest condensed version. :-)
Actually, one wouldn't even need to do that. All one would need to do would be to look at the size (57 or so KBs, about half of which is the title) yawn, and move on to the next post, knowing they've most likely read it about 20 times before. Michael is nothing if not consistent.
Sal
On Mar
--- Rick Archer wrote:
Amma is adamant that money should not be
charged for meditation instruction - even
in a corporate setting.
Do you know the rationale, Rick?
An aside about the attitude toward paying for education:
In the wider Waldorf world, the ideal is that teachers give
from a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Actually, one wouldn't even need to do that. All one would need to
do would be to look at the size (57 or so KBs, about half of which
is the title) yawn, and move on to the next post, knowing they've
most likely
--- TurquoiseB wrote:
From the Vipassana Meditation Website (http://www.dhamma.org/):
The technique of Vipassana Meditation is taught at ten-day
residential courses during which participants learn the
basics of the method, and practice sufficiently to experience
its beneficial results.
on 3/6/06 4:18 PM, Patrick Gillam at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Rick Archer wrote:
Amma is adamant that money should not be
charged for meditation instruction - even
in a corporate setting.
Do you know the rationale, Rick?
Never heard it explained. Amma's not reticent about raising
On Mar 6, 2006, at 3:25 PM, anon_astute_ff wrote:But it has some new age and hindu "baggage" -- a plus for some, a big minus for others. For example one is encouraged, expected, and/or subtly pressured to attend weekly meetings where everyone sings bajans (songs praising hindu gods). At such,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 6, 2006, at 3:25 PM, anon_astute_ff wrote:
But it has some new age and hindu baggage -- a plus for some, a big
minus for others. For example one is encouraged, expected, and/or
subtly pressured to attend weekly
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Dean Goodman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I started TM in 1970, as an adult I paid $75 to learn (and by
a few years later it was $125). It is estimated that prices for
many things have almost doubled every decade. In 1970, gasoline
cost
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The more words it takes someone to defend something,
the more likely it is that what they're defending
is indefensible.
The fewer words it takes to tear down a carefully written, thoughtful
argument, the less
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Dean Goodman
Tantra@ wrote:
Dear Fairfield Lifers,
In response to the recent discussions on this list about
the TM course fee [Why does T/M cost so much to join?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 3/6/06 12:59 PM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
fairfieldlife@ wrote:
Speaking of free meditation techniques, here is a list of
the places Amma's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Think I'll wait for the Readers Digest condensed version. :-)
Too many big words?
On Mar 6, 2006, at 1:19 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
The more words it takes someone to defend something,
the more likely it is that what
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_astute_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Dean Goodman
Tantra@ wrote:
Dear Fairfield Lifers,
In response to the recent
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, claudiouk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Dean Goodman
Tantra@ wrote:
a very thoughtful essay, which I think I saw the first time round.
For a long time I too mistakenly thought that a priority goal was
to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Dean Goodman
Tantra@ wrote:
When I started TM in 1970, as an adult I paid $75 to learn (and by
a few years later it was $125). It is estimated that prices for
many
82 matches
Mail list logo
