--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak
geezerfreak@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak
geezerfreak@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
snip
There's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
. Anyone who wants to read the archives there can ask, and
I may (or may not) grant them access.
Oh man. You better take a long vacation. Every Tom,
HE knew he had a problem (by his standards) and wanted everyone else
to conform to his standards when he couldn't.
So Sparaig, not even able to do the simplest of tasks outlined in the
FFL guidelines; to delete all but the most central theme, endless
repetition of post are not necessary but
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusos108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[partially quoting Lawson:]
HE knew he had a problem (by his standards) and wanted everyone else
to conform to his standards when he couldn't.
So Sparaig, not even able to do the simplest of tasks outlined in the
Good point, Sparaig.
**
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@
wrote:
On Feb 4, 2007, at 5:27 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
No one is saying there is anything wrong with it. Some of us
are
The Isshin-ryu guy I knew - he was a long-time student of the late Sherm
Harrill, who was one of Shimabuku's best early-60's Marine Corp students when
he stationed in Okinawa - used to make the following statements:
If someone attacks you with a knife, two things are gonna happen - you
I saw a cop's training film on edged weapons. They showed how far
away the guy had to be to be able to get your gun out and shoot him
before he got to you with the knife. At 100 feet you were still a
dead man with a gun! Every time we tried to train with fake edged
weapons in my gym I ended up
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The best martial arts defense books I have read was written by a
bouncer, Payton Quinn, who describes how they scan a bar for
trouble.
Do you have more information on this book? I just
scanned Amazon for the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
. Anyone who wants to read the archives there can ask, and
I may (or may
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
The best martial arts defense books I have read was written by a
bouncer, Payton Quinn, who describes how they scan a bar for
Payton's book that I have is Bouncer's Guide To Barroom Brawling:
Dealing With The Sucker Puncher, Streetfighter, And Ambusher
I also learned some interesting stuff from:
Street E E: Evading, Escaping, And Other Ways To Save Your Ass When
Things Get Ugly
Violence, Blunders, And Fractured
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
. Anyone who wants to read the archives there can ask, and
I may (or may
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusos108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HE knew he had a problem (by his standards) and wanted everyone else
to conform to his standards when he couldn't.
So Sparaig, not even able to do the simplest of tasks outlined in the
FFL guidelines; to delete
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
. Anyone who wants to read the archives there can ask, and
I may (or may
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak
geezerfreak@
wrote:
...all you've read is rumors on the internet.
Rick Archer wrote:
Even if it were possible to cross-examine him, which it isn't
and never has been, how would that prove anything? He would deny
it. There is no semen-stained dress here. No photos. As far as we
know no offspring on whom DNA
It is MMY who spread the rumor of his celibacy. Since I have plenty
of evidence that men act in a sexual manor especially when they get
celebrity power over impressionable young women, I just assume that
guys like MMY act according to human nature rather than believing
their miraculous claim that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It is MMY who spread the rumor of his celibacy. Since I have plenty
of evidence that men act in a sexual manor especially when they get
celebrity power over impressionable young women, I just assume that
guys
Now I know you're lying. MMY hates iced drinks...
Alright you got me. Charlie Lutz used to claim that he put a ton of
sugar in his sodas though.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having knocked back more than a few Long Island Iced Teas
with MMY, I can tell you that after two drinks he hits on
the waitress. Every time. He usually tries to hand them
his card with all the gold and
Have all the guys during the sexy sadie period stepped foward
and said that they agree with it?
Rick Archer wrote:
Yes.
Not in the files you provide.
What about Tom Anderson - he claimed he was the Maharishi's secretary
at Spain TTC.
I began the practice of TM in early 1968, became
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have all the guys during the sexy sadie period stepped foward
and said that they agree with it?
Rick Archer wrote:
Yes.
Not in the files you provide.
What about Tom Anderson - he claimed he
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Richard J. Williams
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2007 12:19 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: we have responded 2 much lets just not respond
to Vaj.Ignore all is missives
Have all the
jstein wrote:
What about Tom Anderson - he claimed he was the Maharishi's
secretary at Spain TTC.
(Also known as Sudarsha, now one of the major
contributors to Knapp's TMFree blog; also known
as gerbal88, under which name he posted here
for a while.)
Did Tom Anderson ever say anything
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have all the guys during the sexy sadie period stepped foward
and said that they agree with it?
Rick Archer wrote:
Yes.
Not in the files you provide.
What about Tom Anderson - he claimed he
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Richard J. Williams
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2007 12:19 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: we have responded
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
willytex@ wrote:
Have all the guys during the sexy sadie period stepped
foward
and said that they agree with it?
Rick Archer wrote:
Yes.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick Archer wrote:
...where do you think most of the Sexy Sadie file
came from?
From private emails from disgruntled informants who got kicked out of
the TMO?
Geez, grow up Tex. Or don't. Believe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jstein wrote:
What about Tom Anderson - he claimed he was the Maharishi's
secretary at Spain TTC.
(Also known as Sudarsha, now one of the major
contributors to Knapp's TMFree blog; also known
as
You made me snoke milk out of my nose.
Ok, wine, but you get the picture.
Just to be fair I should add that after a third one he would forget
all about chicks and just want to fight everybody in the bar. We
always got tossed out before he could get a fourth one down...
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You made me snoke milk out of my nose.
Ok, wine, but you get the picture.
Just to be fair I should add that after a third one he would forget
all about chicks and just want to fight everybody in the bar.
About fifteen years ago I was talking to a powerful and pretty well known
psychic and, just out of curiousity, I mentioned Maharishi (by the way, this
person was better at reading names than anyone I have met before or since).
The response I got (verbatim, 1993): He is a wonderful human
Yep. And then always trying to explain himself afterwards.See,
the ting is.
Happy New Year Geezerfreak.
Once I would hear the phrase I've got the highest teaching, what are
you looking at... I knew it was time to grab our coats.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. Anyone who wants to read the archives there can ask, and
I may (or may not) grant them access.
Oh man. You better take a long vacation. Every Tom, Dick and Judy is
going to be after you to take a peek.
Speaking of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jonathan Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
About fifteen years ago I was talking to a powerful and pretty well
known psychic and, just out of curiousity, I mentioned Maharishi (by
the way, this person was better at reading names than anyone I have
met before
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jonathan Chadwick
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2007 1:28 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: we have responded 2 much lets just not
respond to Vaj.Ignore all is missives
About fifteen
I'm not saying anything is or is not true (re. what M. did, what some psychic
said, etc.) Frankly, I just thought it was curious that I was told this many
years ago by a person who objectively speaking as far as I could see knew
nothing about M.
geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You made me snoke milk out of my nose.
Ok, wine, but you get the picture.
Just to be fair I should add that after a third one he would forget
all about chicks and just want to fight everybody in the bar.
any real martial arts master will tell you that having to resort to any
physical form of violence is the greatest form of weakness+
jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You made me snoke milk out of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
Just to be fair I should add that after a third one he would
forget
all about chicks and just want to fight everybody in the bar. We
always got tossed out before he could get a fourth one down...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jonathan Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
any real martial arts master will tell you that having to resort to
any physical form of violence is the greatest form of weakness+
Just the ones who can't really fight and rely on magic powers and
bluffing. Did
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jonathan Chadwick jochadw1@
wrote:
About fifteen years ago I was talking to a powerful and pretty
well
known psychic and, just out of curiousity, I mentioned Maharishi
(by
And who said these people are not regular guys . . . I guess the great thing
about Socrates and Gurdjieff (my two personalfavorites) is that they really
could drink you under the table and they really could fight (at least in their
younger days). Socrates had two little kids running around
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of nablusos108
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2007 4:33 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: we have responded 2 much lets just not respond
to Vaj.Ignore all is missives
You americans are a silly lot
Actually I was quoting Shimabuku, the founder of Isshin-Ryu. His family was
more or less held hostage in Okinawa by the Japanese Army in WWII while he was
forced to train the elite of the elite in hand to hand. He was reputedly the
greatest of his time in the empire.
curtisdeltablues [EMAIL
On Feb 4, 2007, at 5:27 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
No one is saying there is anything wrong with it. Some of us are
questioning the appropriateness of gurus hitting on disciples less
than half their age.
So it would be okay to hit on followers closer to their own age? What
about a female guru
I stand corrected. The guy sounds like a badass. He can say anything
he wants!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jonathan Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Actually I was quoting Shimabuku, the founder of Isshin-Ryu. His
family was more or less held hostage in Okinawa by the Japanese
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Sal Sunshine
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2007 5:41 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: we have responded 2 much lets just not
respond to Vaj.Ignore all is missives
So it would be okay to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Feb 4, 2007, at 5:27 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
No one is saying there is anything wrong with it. Some of us are
questioning the appropriateness of gurus hitting on disciples less
than half their age.
So it
On Feb 4, 2007, at 6:33 PM, geezerfreak wrote:
Can't speak for Rick, but he, in fact, knows some of the women who
have been mentally harmed by MMY's sexual actions. So do I. Do you?
It's hard to push it out of your mind and just move on when it's
personal.
I didn't say not to care, Geez.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jonathan Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
any real martial arts master will tell you that having to resort to any
physical form of
violence is the greatest form of weakness+
Yep. Them kung fu masters during the Boxer Rebellion beat the opposition hands
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jonathan Chadwick jochadw1@
wrote:
any real martial arts master will tell you that having to resort to
any physical form of violence is the greatest form of weakness+
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 4, 2007, at 5:27 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
No one is saying there is anything wrong with it. Some of us are
questioning the appropriateness of gurus hitting on disciples less
than half their age.
So it
sparaig wrote:
So, in the case of MMY's secretaries, you think they would
talk to the guy who procurred them for him?
The only secretary I've seen posting on the internet is Tom Anderson
on Usenet, and although Tom had lots to say about the
comings-and-goings of the Maharishi, including what
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sparaig wrote:
So, in the case of MMY's secretaries, you think they would
talk to the guy who procurred them for him?
The only secretary I've seen posting on the internet is Tom Anderson
on Usenet, and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
willytex@ wrote:
sparaig wrote:
So, in the case of MMY's secretaries, you think they would
talk to the guy who procurred them for him?
The only
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
willytex@ wrote:
sparaig wrote:
So, in the case of MMY's secretaries, you think
But there's nothing like the cross - and nobody posting here has
had the occasion to cross-examine the Maharishi to get his side
of the story, and that's a fact. Until someone does that, the
issue is moot, and therefore cannot be established. It's just
gossip, pure and simple.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But there's nothing like the cross - and nobody posting here has
had the occasion to cross-examine the Maharishi to get his side
of the story, and that's a fact. Until someone does that, the
issue is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
willytex@ wrote:
geezerfreak wrote:
Cross-examine MMY to get his side of the story. That's just
hilarious. I'll get right on that.
Well, first of all, you obviously haven't even talked to a Maharishi
secretary in your whole life, much less the Maharishi himself. You
haven't presented any evidence at all -
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Richard J. Williams
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 11:53 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: we have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
willytex@ wrote:
But there's nothing like the cross - and nobody posting here has
had the occasion to cross-examine the Maharishi to get his side
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
geezerfreak wrote:
Cross-examine MMY to get his side of the story. That's just
hilarious. I'll get right on that.
Well, first of all, you obviously haven't even talked to a Maharishi
secretary in your whole life,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@
wrote:
---
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of sparaig
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 1:11 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: we have responded 2 much lets just not respond
to Vaj.Ignore all is missives
Well, OK. So you're saying that
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of sparaig
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 1:13 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: we have responded 2 much lets just not respond
to Vaj.Ignore all is missives
By the same token, does someone
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of sparaig
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 1:18 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: we have responded 2 much lets just not respond
to Vaj.Ignore all is missives
How many personal secretaries
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
How many personal secretaries has MMY gone through?
Rick, why don't you take this? You've got a pretty complete list...at
least from the late 60's on. The
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of geezerfreak
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 1:26 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: we have responded 2 much lets just not respond
to Vaj.Ignore all is missives
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of sparaig
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 1:13 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: we have responded 2 much lets
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
How many personal secretaries has MMY gone through?
Rick, why don't you take
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of sparaig
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 1:18 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: we have responded 2 much lets
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of geezerfreak
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 1:26 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: we have responded 2 much
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of sparaig
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 1:37 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: we have responded 2 much lets just not respond
to Vaj.Ignore all is missives
Of course not. That's why
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of sparaig
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 1:37 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: we have responded 2 much lets
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@
wrote:
---
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of sparaig
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 1:46 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: we have responded 2 much lets just not respond
to Vaj.Ignore all is missives
Have all the guys during the
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of sparaig
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 1:43 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: we have responded 2 much lets just not respond
to Vaj.Ignore all is missives
So, there was a period where MMY
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of sparaig
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 1:37 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: we have responded 2 much
Somewhat parallel to Sprarig's point, if even if a person went outside
the norm, even outside the law for 5 years over a 90 year life, 70
year career, most would see it as a minor abberation, a minor blip in
the longer trend. I tend to, i think most tend to, look at the longer
run an give people
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of sparaig
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 1:46 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: we have responded 2 much lets
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lets assume the accounts are all true -- over a five year span. Does
that diminish everything else he has done?
Of course, he has done other things, over the past 30 years, which to
me are sadder in terms of not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somewhat parallel to Sprarig's point, if even if a person went outside
the norm, even outside the law for 5 years over a 90 year life, 70
year career, most would see it as a minor abberation, a minor blip in
the longer
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of sparaig
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 1:46 PM
To:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
Somewhat parallel to Sprarig's point, if even if a person went outside
the norm, even outside the law for 5 years over a 90 year life, 70
year
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of geezerfreak
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 6:35 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: we have responded 2 much lets just not respond
to Vaj.Ignore all is missives
Well, not all, not, John
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of geezerfreak
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 6:35 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: we have responded 2 much
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see the two as related. What does the first say about
the man's mindset? How much of what he appeared to be
was just an appearance? How did the culture of secrecy
that he had to adopt - including the banishment of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sal Sunshine wrote:
As you can see, there's absolutely no
arguing or insulting going on at all.
Except for Vaj calling the Maharishi a perv. Silence
usually indicates agreement. What's up with that?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@
wrote:
On Feb 1, 2007, at 5:58 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
Yo geezerfreak. Missed you.
Hey Rick! Been traveling like a maniac and haven't
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
