--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hyperbolicgeometry"
> wrote:
> >
> > ---Effortless or not (nothing in the world is "absolutely"
> effortless
> > btw); the key point is Transcendental awareness. If it (pure
>
http://tinyurl.com/zyv9t
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Dean Goodman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> SELF-DOUBT AND CYNICISM VS. PROFOUND TRUST
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God;
because, if there be one, he must more approve of
the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear."
-- T
On Mar 13, 2006, at 10:41 PM, wayback71 wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mar 13, 2006, at 9:21 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
> >
> > > An MUM staffer says that Bevan and lawyers are putting quite a bit
> > > into the
> > > lawsuit against MUM b
On Mar 14, 2006, at 1:50 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hyperbolicgeometry"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > ---Effortless or not (nothing in the world is "absolutely"
> > effortless btw); the key point is Transcendental awareness.
> > If it (pure Consciousness
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hyperbolicgeometry"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ---Effortless or not (nothing in the world is "absolutely" effortless
> btw);
Yes.
> the key point is Transcendental awareness. If it (pure
> Consciousness, Self-awareness), occurs for you regardless of the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hyperbolicgeometry"
> wrote:
> >
> > ---Effortless or not (nothing in the world is "absolutely"
> > effortless btw); the key point is Transcendental awareness.
> > If it (pure
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 14, 2006, at 1:50 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hyperbolicgeometry"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > ---Effortless or not (nothing in the world is "absolutely"
> > > effortless btw); the key poin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, defenders_of_bhakti
> wrote:
>
> >
> > I think there is a big confusion of what evolution actually means.
> > Here some biological definitions:
> >
> > Evolution: The long-term pr
Just a couple of points:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, defenders_of_bhakti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I agree. Actually, I was just trying to poke some fun on
> the 'walking meditation' supposedly more effortless than
> TM according to some here.
The meditation *component* of it is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, defenders_of_bhakti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hyperbolicgeometry"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > ---Effortless or not (nothing in the world is "absolutely"
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
First this:
> Ok...you can go back to arguing about whose techniques
> and belief systems are "best" now. I just wanted to
> correct your misstatement of what I've said.
Not my involvment, you know very well.
> Just a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > But an approximation. And as such not bad.
>
> Agreed. Not bad *at all*. *Especially* as compared
> to forms of concentration. But I get the feeling
> that some people aren't willing to live with TM's
> "effortless
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, defenders_of_bhakti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> First this:
>
> > Ok...you can go back to arguing about whose techniques
> > and belief systems are "best" now. I just wanted to
> > correct your
On Mar 13, 2006, at 11:25 PM, sparaig wrote:
> > > > Yeah, but as I say, effortlessness in the TM sense
> > > > *can't* be an expectation. You can only expect
> > > > *something*, you can't expect *nothing*. Or to put
> > > > it another way, any expectation of effortlessness
> > > > that you mi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hyperbolicgeometry"
> wrote:
> >
> > ---Effortless or not (nothing in the world is "absolutely"
> > effortless btw); the key point is Transcendental awareness.
> > If it (pure
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> wrote:
> >
> > I could easily have been guilty of the same negligence
> > Joel Wysong displayed while watching the guy. I suspect
> > he was in the other room medi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> 0> > I did say in that in the early stages there may be
> > > some very slight effort until the automatic cycle
> > > is established.
> >
> > What if that "automatic cycle" is NEVER established? Does this
mean
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I could easily have been guilty of the same negligence
> > > Joel Wysong dis
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Dean Goodman
> wrote:
> >
> > SELF-DOUBT AND CYNICISM VS. PROFOUND TRUST
>
> "Question with boldness even the existence of a God;
> because, if there be one, he must mor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, defenders_of_bhakti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hyperbolicgeometry"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > ---Effortless or not (nothing in the world is "absolutely"
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 14, 2006, at 1:50 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hyperbolicgeometry"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > ---Effortless or not (nothing in the world is "absolutely"
> > > effortless btw); the
On Mar 14, 2006, at 9:07 AM, authfriend wrote:
> > I don't know Joel, but it's very possible that he's
> > like some people here and convinced that he was "not
> > the doer" in this whole scenario and thus bears no
> > responsibility for it whatsoever.
>
> Amazing. Barry's *still* getting "not t
I just found this website that discusses the uses of bhang (a cannabis drink)
in conjunction with a Hindu holiday on Thursday, March 16. I already knew
that Shiva was the God of intoxicants, but had never heard of the ritual use of
this drug in conjunction with this particular holiday. Here' s a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, defenders_of_bhakti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hyperbolicgeometry"
> wrote:
> >
> > ---Effortless or not (nothing in the world is "absolutely"
> > effortless btw);
>
> Yes.
>
> > the key point is Transcendental a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > PErhaps because they DID screw up, to some extent?
> > >
> > > What "perhaps"?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > On Mar 14, 2006, at 1:50 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hyperbolicgeometry"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ---Effortless or not (
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "markmeredith2002"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > PEr
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > On Mar 14, 2006, at 1:50 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hyperbolicgeometry"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ---Effortless or not (n
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just a couple of points:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, defenders_of_bhakti
> wrote:
> >
> > I agree. Actually, I was just trying to poke some fun on
> > the 'walking meditation' supposedly more effortles
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, defenders_of_bhakti
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hyperbolicgeometry"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, defenders_of_bhakti
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
wrote:
> >
> > First this:
> >
> > > Ok...you can go back to arguing about whose techniqu
on 3/13/06 11:30 PM, gullible fool at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> That's when I was there. I took the sidhis in 1977
> from Aug 12 to Oct 7, with block 3 Sept 9-23, the same
> time as the governors conference. I can't believe that
> MMY was there, though, because no one on the citizens
> side of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 14, 2006, at 9:07 AM, authfriend wrote:
>
> > > I don't know Joel, but it's very possible that he's
> > > like some people here and convinced that he was "not
> > > the doer" in this whole scenario and thus bears no
on 3/14/06 1:50 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just *think* how many similar tragedies within the
> TM movement will get to come out in this lawsuit.
> Ya got the suicides on TM courses, ya got the guy
> burning himself to death after having been locked
> away in a basement room.
No
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > > On Mar 14, 2006, at 1:50 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hyp
Title: FW: Mr. M + money
from a fellow in Germany:
After reading this post about Mr. M. and his money, (* down there )
I had a session to look inside and understand what is wrong
in the money scheme in the TMO and the Mr. M.
I saw him with a huge bulk of money, looking at it and being a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > PErhaps because they DID screw up, to some extent?
> > >
> > > What "perhaps"?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> 0> > I did say in that in the early stages there may be
> > > some very slight effort until the automatic cycle
> > > is established.
> >
> > What if that "automatic cycle" is NEVER established? Does this
mean
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > on 3/13/06 10:10 PM, shempmcgurk at shempmcgurk@ wrote:>>
> > > >
> > > > H
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, defenders_of_bhakti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hyperbolicgeometry"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > ---Effortless or not (nothing in the world is "absolutely"
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 14, 2006, at 1:50 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hyperbolicgeometry"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > ---Effortless or not (nothing in the world is "absolutely"
> > > effortless btw); the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, defenders_of_bhakti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hyperbolicgeometry"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > ---Effortless or not (nothing in the world is "absolutely"
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, defenders_of_bhakti
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hyperbolicgeometry"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just a couple of points:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, defenders_of_bhakti
> wrote:
> >
> > I agree. Actually, I was just trying to poke some fun on
> > the 'walking meditation' supposedly more effortles
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > I'd start saying bye-bye to MUM if I were you. If they
> > lose a multi-million-dollar lawsuit in addition to
> > having no students, I'd bet that Fairfield
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hyperbolicgeometry"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > ---Effortless or not (nothing in the world is "absolutely"
> > > ef
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 13, 2006, at 11:25 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > > > > Yeah, but as I say, effortlessness in the TM sense
> > > > > *can't* be an expectation. You can only expect
> > > > > *something*, you can't expect *nothing*. Or t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister
> wrote:
> >
> > 0> > I did say in that in the early stages there may be
> > > > some very slight effort until the automatic cycle
> > > > is established.
> > >
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, defenders_of_bhakti
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hyperbolicgeometry"
> > > w
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mar 14, 2006, at 1:50 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hyperbolicgeometry"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ---Effo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > > On Mar 14, 2006, at 1:50 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hyp
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
[...]
> > People start jumping all over each other, normally-
> > mutually-supportive TBs start arguing with each other
> > over whose meditation is more effor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > Just a couple of points:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, defenders_of_bhakti
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I agree. Actually, I was just tryin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd start saying bye-bye to MUM if I were you. If they
> > > lose a multi-million-dollar
on 3/14/06 9:48 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> 2) it would be very sad for Fairfield if MUM went away, don't you
>> agree?
>
> Not really.
Might be good for it. Something more "interesting" may take over the
university. Fairfield is well established as an eclectic spiritual comm
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > I'd suggest it's about a couple of former TMers
> > feeling panicky because they're realizing they
> > missed the whole point.
>
> Or perhaps, they DID ge
Rick sounds like the Bush Administration, wanting to "liberate" subject
peoples. Has it occurred to anyone on this board that people who live at
MUM might actually enjoy the experience? That's why they live there!
May heaven save us from self-appointed "liberators."
--- In FairfieldLife@yah
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'd start saying bye-by
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Rick sounds like the Bush Administration, wanting to "liberate" subject
> peoples. Has it occurred to anyone on this board that people who
live at
> MUM might actually enjoy the experience? That's why they live there!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > What I'm contending is that only when TM is 100
> > percent effortless is one actually practicing TM.
> > So in a given session, I may be practicing TM only
It's the same way of thinking, though. The idea that "we" know more than
"they" do about what's good for them. If you talk to people on campus about
why they are there, you will get almost as many answers as there are people.
Everyone has their own reasons. Instead of talking about people needin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
wrote:
> > >
> > > Just a couple of points:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, defende
The bulk of the people who have chosen to remain in FF, after pretty
much having severed their ties to the MIU/MUM way of life are anything
but Plain Folks.
Following Lady Saints (not that there's anything wrong with that),
doing fire yagyas and the like, and the myriad host of other types of
spi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd suggest it's about a couple of former TMers
> > > feeling panicky because they're r
on 3/14/06 10:51 AM, feste37 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's the same way of thinking, though. The idea that "we" know more than
> "they" do about what's good for them. If you talk to people on campus about
> why they are there, you will get almost as many answers as there are people.
> Everyon
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> The question is, why are you so desperate to "prove"
> TM isn't effortless?
It might be asked (in fact I think I'll do that) why you, authfriend,
find something wrong with every single thing Turqoise says. And
I'm wondering what other experiences are.. during meditation and the question of arriving at the state of 'settled intellect' as was discussed by Maharishi in the state of Samadhi.. As the intellect is the function of the mind to discriminate between 'this or that'. Does the intellect settle b
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "anonyff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > The question is, why are you so desperate to "prove"
> > TM isn't effortless?
>
> It might be asked (in fact I think I'll do that) why you,
authfriend,
Happy Holi!
For those of you interested in tantra my teacher sent me the URL to this
Indian site which has a lot of good information on tantra including
links to other sites and lists of books on the subject:
www.whitetantra.net
Jai Ma,
Bhairitu
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
on 3/14/06 11:31 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Perhaps this will help: If he stopped being such an
> arrogant phony and acquired a measure of respect for
> accuracy, I would probably find a lot fewer things
> wrong with what he says.
Byron Katie to the rescue: http://www.thework.co
Sure, it's just great, Feste. When are you moving there? :)
Sal
On Mar 14, 2006, at 10:23 AM, feste37 wrote:
Rick sounds like the Bush Administration, wanting to "liberate" subject
peoples. Has it occurred to anyone on this board that people who live at
MUM might actually enjoy the experi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "anonyff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > The question is, why are you so desperate to "prove"
> > TM isn't effortless?
>
> It might be asked (in fact I think I'll do that) why you,
> authfriend
Barry
I've read these groups, starting with amt, going back as near as I can
remember to the mid 90s, I know you two, and Lawson in his own way,
have been at it for a long time.
What I don't really understand is why you both choose to remain at it?
It seems to me (but what do I know) th
on 3/14/06 11:46 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "anonyff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>>>
>>> The question is, why are you so desperate to "prove"
>>> TM isn't effortless?
>>
>> It mi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's the same way of thinking, though. The idea that "we" know more
than
> "they" do about what's good for them. If you talk to people on
campus about
> why they are there, you will get almost as many answers as there
on 3/14/06 12:04 PM, anonyff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You seem to go out of your way to provoke Judy knowing full well that
> if you say things a certain way it's going to cause her to respond
> then you, etc.
Kinda reminds me of how I used to pick on my little sister. I knew what her
rea
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "anonyff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You might not be interested in taking a writing class and
> learning how to really say what you want to say in a very
> precise way, maybe that wouldn't suit your style, but you
> do seem very chameleonlike in your po
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> And the news for those who would go into an orgy of delight if MUM
folded is .
> . . it ain't gonna happen. For those who live in Fairfield, go take
a look at the
> new construction going on there. MUM is in a growth
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I'm wondering what other experiences are.. during meditation and
the question of arriving at the state of 'settled intellect' as was
discussed by Maharishi in the state of Samadhi..
> As the intellect is the fun
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "anonyff" wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
wrote:
> > >
> > > The question is, why are you so desperate to "prove"
> > > TM isn't effortless?
> >
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "anonyff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Barry
>
> I've read these groups, starting with amt, going back as near as I
> can remember to the mid 90s, I know you two, and Lawson in his own
> way, have been at it for a long time.
>
> What I don't reall
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 3/14/06 12:04 PM, anonyff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > You seem to go out of your way to provoke Judy knowing full well
that
> > if you say things a certain way it's going to cause her to respond
> > then yo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> It isn't just sloppiness by any means, although that's
> certainly a factor. The major problem is his deliberate
> disregard for accuracy and penchant for intentional
> misrepresentation.
>
Yah, that is what I m
Sorry, it appears the numbers of each article in the brief didn't
paste properly, nor did the more readable format. I've emailed Rick
the file separately and if he adds it to the files section it may
appear in a more palatable version.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---
If the particulars regarding Joel Wysong are accurate here, I'm sorry
but I'll retract my previous posts from yesterday saying he shouldn't
feel guilty or responsible over the death of Levi.
If the particulars of the brief are true, he should feel VERY
responsible and VERY guilty. He added hor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> If the particulars regarding Joel Wysong are accurate here, I'm
sorry
> but I'll retract my previous posts from yesterday saying he
shouldn't
> feel guilty or responsible over the death of Levi.
>
> If the part
Which article are you referring to, Shemp?
Sal
On Mar 14, 2006, at 1:11 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
If the particulars regarding Joel Wysong are accurate here, I'm sorry
but I'll retract my previous posts from yesterday saying he shouldn't
feel guilty or responsible over the death of Levi.
If
Shuvender's facial assault required less stitches.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
--
Oops--never mind.
On Mar 14, 2006, at 1:06 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA
CENTRAL DIVISION
On Mar 14, 2006, at 1:15 PM, Sal Sunshine wrote:
Which article are you referring to, Shemp?
Sal
On Mar 14, 2006, at 1:11 PM, shempmcgur
And here I thought the original president of the university was George Wallace, which explained why everyone always wore long flowing white robes.
Sal
On Mar 14, 2006, at 1:06 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
The original president of the University, Dr. Robert
Wallace
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Which article are you referring to, Shemp?
>
> Sal
Although they didn't copy and paste from the brief to my posting, I
am referring to articles 57-63
Articles 57-63 are reproduced here (sorry, without the number
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine
> wrote:
> >
> > Which article are you referring to, Shemp?
> >
> > Sal
>
>
> Although they didn't copy and paste from the brief to my posting,
I
> am referr
Thanks. I knew about the rummaging, but not the clapping and waving of hands, or the part about JW fearing for his safety. Quite a revelation. And I agree with your conclusion.
Sal
On Mar 14, 2006, at 1:20 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTE
Hello,
This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the FairfieldLife
group.
File: /TMO -- the Odd Side/Iowa Complaint -- Butler case.doc
Uploaded by : rick_archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description : Iowa complaint filed b
I got a good laugh out of this, especially your comment, "Since the advent of
Stapathya Veda the place reminds me of a Madame
> Blavatsky convention, a bunch of aged dour looking people." Have you
been to Annapurna dining hall recently, Anon? I think you might be surprised
at what you find ther
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister
> wrote:
> >
> > 0> > I did say in that in the early stages there may be
> > > > some very slight effort until the automatic cycle
> > > > is established.
> > >
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> If the particulars regarding Joel Wysong are accurate here, I'm sorry
> but I'll retract my previous posts from yesterday saying he shouldn't
> feel guilty or responsible over the death of Levi.
>
> If the partic
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "anonyff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" wrote:
> >
> >
> > And the news for those who would go into an orgy of delight if
MUM
> folded is .
> > . . it ain't gonna happen. For those who live in Fairfield, go
t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > If the particulars regarding Joel Wysong are accurate here, I'm
sorry
> > but I'll retract my previous posts from yesterday saying he
shouldn'
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
