--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I mean, in the case of long-term TMers, you've
heard Maharishi describe this state (or states, if
you want to get nitpicky) for 30 to 40 years now.
Have any of these descriptions ever helped you in
any way to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
I would like my comment to be separated from any connection with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
snip
Another wrinkle: what exactly does able to do
the siddhis actually mean in the context of
Unity consciousness? Does it really mean
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Bingo! I wouldn't have bought and read her book if it had not been
for the
wailing, gnashing of teeth, and general outrage expressed by so
many prominent
Democrats. However, I'm glad I did and might read her other books
as
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another wrinkle: what exactly does able to do
the siddhis actually mean in the context of
Unity consciousness? Does it really mean on
demand?
This ends up in the broader question of free will and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jim Flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Just curious if others are experiencing this, and if there is
anything to be done about it.The FFL site was down for several hours
beginning yesterday evening, and again now for about an hour so far.
Doesn't seem
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/13/06 5:22:52 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
on 6/13/06 1:55 PM, Bhairitu at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I'm curious about is why anyone who practices TM (or any
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
I think there is a line between internal experience, which is tougher
to verify, and an external event that can be wittnessed by
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm surprised anyone takes Ann Coulter seriously. She seems to me
like a
mischievous, playful child who enjoys setting fire to things and
causing a lot of
petty havoc. She's having fun and making money and annoying
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
snip
Right. But the issue I'm trying to get at is whether
it makes sense to claim someone doesn't have the
siddhis because they do not/cannot perform them
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
snip
Right
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another wrinkle: what exactly does able to do
the siddhis actually mean in the context of
Unity consciousness? Does it really mean on
demand?
This ends up in the broader question of free will and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
However, there could be a good deal of semantic
ambiguity here, in light of how MMY defines Unity
consciousness.
In other words: Does he have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote
Just for the record, the stats show that NYC is
the lowest-crime big city. Guess which big city
is the highest?
Dallas. Must be all those librul judges...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shukra69 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is because Purusha has gone to Holland.
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlist@ wrote:
TorquiseB writes snipped:
Life
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
It does interest me that Yogananda's book is a
fantastic example of how spiritual people use the appearance of
science when it suits them. The New Testament does the same thing.
It appears to follow
I quoted him!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
Another wrinkle: what exactly does able to do
the siddhis actually mean in the context of
Unity consciousness
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
snip
It does interest me that Yogananda's book
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good points. This one interested me the most:
rather by recognizing that mysticism is completely
beyond science.
It is beyond the scientific method in its focus and range, but I
think Sam Harris would claim
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Curtis you might enjoy the following brief talk with Ken Wilber where
he answers the question does quantum physics prove god? where he
rather elegantly explains that the quantum state is not unmanifest
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Guest Column
Scientists respond to Gore's warnings of climate catastrophe
The Inconvenient Truth is indeed inconvenient to alarmists
By Tom Harris
Monday, June 12, 2006
www.CanadianFreePress.com
Scientists have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sal,
I don't get it. What am I missing?
Long story, an episode that took place before
you made your appearance here; but she's suggesting
that Bob is lying.
(Strangely enough, I got the sense you were
hinting
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Quoting Schroedinger:]
Let us see whether we cannot draw the correct, noncontradictory
conclusion from the following two premises:
(i) My body functions as a pure mechanism according to the Laws
of Nature
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
That was really interesting, thanks!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jun 14,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, coshlnx coshlnx@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The enlightened person,
according to MMY's teaching, doesn't make
mistakes *from nature's perspective*; but it's
entirely possible for nature to want the
enlightened person to make a mistake, for
nature's own
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
This is a frequent mistake people make, *assuming* that Maharishi
[or another guru] is enlightened (I think psychologists refer to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 15, 2006, at 2:20 AM, sparaig wrote:
snip
Well, let's see, Ken Wilber, a rather superficial (sorry Judy)
philosopher who has had a few
grad-level QM courses as part of his work in biology, concludes
that QM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
snip
Also, I'm not at all sure what Wilber says in this
vein contradicts Hagelin. I think
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Quoting Schroedinger:]
Let us see whether we cannot draw the correct, noncontradictory
conclusion from the following two premises:
(i) My body functions as a pure mechanism according to the Laws
of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
[...]
I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
[Quoting Schroedinger:]
Let us see whether we cannot
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You made a number of new points that are helping me understand how you
are seeing the quote. It will take some time for me to unpack it. I
think this is worth the time. It is as good a tool as any to discuss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 15, 2006, at 11:05 PM, sparaig wrote:
snip
So, does he ever name names? What's his take on John Hagelin?
Not yet, that I've heard--but then Hagelin hasn't published best-
selling books (however KW has blasted, What
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
from a footnote (!) in Sex, Ecology, Spirituality
Nowhere are the catastrophes of taking monological sciences and
trying to make them into a complete new paradigm more obvious than
in the new physics and mysticism
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/15/06 11:56:03 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ann Coulter's comments about the 9/11 widows
...or...
Hillary Clinton returning a campaign donation to Wal-Mart.
No doubt in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
snip
And there have been other widows that have come out and
defended Ann Coulters remarks
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 6/15/06 11:56:03 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
shempmcgurk@ writes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/16/06 10:56:06 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(These would be the women, just for the record, whose
activism resulted in the 9/11 commission to determine
what really
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/16/06 4:08:59 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Criticizing them is one thing. Saying they were
enjoying their husbands' deaths because their
husbands had been unfaithful to them
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remember that old bone we were chewing on?
Indeed I do. I just got back home, and almost the
first thing I did was haul out Quantum Questions
to reread the entire The 'I' That Is God essay
from which I took the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great points. Thanks for taking the time. I will take a little
time
to make sure I let them sink in.
I can't resist this one to start:
The irony is that if what you're calling the group 'I'
is in fact
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
This is so abstract it's hard to get across, but do
you remember I said my experience of development of
consciousness was one of increasing transparency? Part
of that is that limitations become transparent
From the New York Times;
June 18, 2006
'Star Trek' Fans, Deprived of a Show, Recreate the Franchise on
Digital Video
By DANNY HAKIM
MASON NECK STATE PARK, Va. Paul Sieber was wearing a Star Trek
uniform in the deep Virginia woods when he found himself surrounded
by a leathery-looking
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't resist suggesting that perhaps the concept
that seemed so powerful and important *was itself
limited* as it existed in your mind at the time,
and that at a certain point you had grown beyond
what it
, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
snip
This is so abstract it's hard to get across, but do
you remember I said my experience of development of
consciousness was one of increasing transparency? Part
of that is that limitations become
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, matrixmonitor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I
left the article at home and forgot my password, so I can only copy
what's in the Newscientist website: the first paragraph.
I sure would love it if you could copy in more
when you have access to the article
Vaj wrote:
What I was asking was there any hint
that some of the research had been fudged for PR purposes?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't think of any examples of that because I believed the
research was valid. Since then I have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Monday, June 19, 2006 10:27 a.m. EDT
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. 2004 Voter Theft Theory Debunked
Cleveland's leading newspaper has checked out a new article by
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. claiming that Republicans stole
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, matrixmonitor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Kochen and Conway stress that their theorem doesn't disprove 't
Hooft's theory. It simply states that if his theory is true, our
actions cannot be free. And they admit that there's no way for us
to tell. Our
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, matrixmonitor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's the first part of the article, and then underneath, selected
quotes and summaries of the main points: [brackets, mine].
Meant to say, many thanks for posting this!
Yahoo!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, matrixmonitor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Q's lesson: think twice before messing with the past. an
alternative past may turn out worse than the real past.
It's occurred to me to wonder (fancifully) whether
the fact that we never seem to be able to nail down
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, matrixmonitor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-
Unlike the MMY/Hagelin/Chopra Unified Field hypothesis which
any
reputable physicist with half a brain would find laughable;
Like Sparaig, I'd be interested to know *why* you find
it laughable (not being a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, matrixmonitor
matrixmonitor@ wrote:
Critique of the What the Bleep movie, featuring Hagelin and
other
proponents of quantum metaphysics. (his pic featured...):
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, matrixmonitor
matrixmonitor@ wrote:
Q's lesson: think twice before messing with the past. an
alternative
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, matrixmonitor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of the ongoing discussions in this forum elicit a possible
interface with the Turing test (below, entry copied from
Wikipedia). Briefly, the person being tested sits behind a screen
in which answers to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, matrixmonitor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The fact that we can't tell if our will is free or not; leaves the
door open for an ironic paradox: we can act AS IF our will is free,
even if it isn't, and not be the worse for wear. We can't even tell
if
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, matrixmonitor
matrixmonitor@ wrote:
snip
The fact that we can't tell if our will is free or not; leaves
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The fact that we can't tell if our will is free or not; leaves
the
door open for an ironic paradox: we can act AS IF our will is
free, even if it isn't, and not be the worse for wear. We can't
even tell if our
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shemp, you can't seriously believe that these captured documents
are anything other than fakes cooked up by the US psy-ops boys to
fool
the American public into believing that we are winning this war.
They were more
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
In discussing this with Tom Traynor, he wrapped it up
perfectly:
Things happen exactly as they should. Why? Because
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jody at http://guruphiliac.blogspot.com/ has an entirely different
perspective on SSRS.
Gosh, you mean Sri Sri *isn't* MMY with all
the mistakes taken out?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neat. Reminds me of Tibetan prayer wheels. High tech
sadhana. And who is to say that it doesn't work?
Overhead, without any fuss...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer groups@ wrote:
Electronic
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neat. Reminds me of Tibetan prayer wheels. High tech
sadhana. And who is to say that it doesn't work?
(Can you *imagine* the hilarity if it were MMY
marketing an electronic mantra-chanting machine?)
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
Jody at http://guruphiliac.blogspot.com/ has an entirely
different
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
Stop the pissing contest.
So what if SSRS has 20 million?
It's not about the numbers. It's that one of these
two teachers of meditation is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aha!
http://snsvo8.seekandsource.com/rkenter/vopage1.html
Does that old boyfriend/girlfriend keep hanging around,
and you just can't get rid of him/her? Are you being
stalked by somebody you met on a chat group? Are bill
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 21, 2006, at 7:41 PM, Vaj wrote:
On Jun 21, 2006, at 7:29 PM, new.morning wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If only he would've found a simple, effortless form of meditation...
http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/6/212006b.asp
Kansas Pastor Accuses New Age Group of Denying Its Religious Nature
By Natalie Harris
June 21,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I got 10 out of 14 right.
14 of 14 here. The two writing styles are fairly distinct.
Facists are so predictable.
--- Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5871006181947402801q=chogyam
He seems rather critical of TM.
Gosh, Vaj, it's really amazing how many pieces critical
of TM and MMY you seem to just stumble on, isn't it?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 22, 2006, at 9:58 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?
docid=5871006181947402801q=chogyam
He seems rather critical of TM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?
docid=5871006181947402801q=chogyam
He seems rather critical of TM.
Actually, he's rather critical of his
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 jyouells@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, uns_tressor uns_tressor@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablus108 nablus108@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jun 23, 2006, at 7:47 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jun 22, 2006, at 9:58 PM, authfriend wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/23/06 12:24:51 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did Hitler use the term liberal? I thought he called people
communists. I
know to many the terms would be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Peter, you've got to laid, man.
Oooh. Somebody's feeling threatened.
--- peterklutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
groups@ wrote:
on 6/22/06 3:43 PM, nablus108 at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 23, 2006, at 7:47 AM, authfriend wrote:
snip
Gosh, Vaj, it's really amazing how many pieces critical
of TM and MMY you seem to just stumble on, isn't it?
Support of nature, I guess. I was looking for video
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jun 22, 2006, at 9:58 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/23/06 10:42:01 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So Hitler
referred to the communists as Bolsheviks, I believe, rather than
communists.
Like the communists, Hitler and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On June 3rd 2006, MUM students show Creative Intelligence in
action,
one of the benefits of Unified Field based education:
PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@
wrote:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?
docid=5871006181947402801q=chogyam
He seems rather critical of TM.
Gosh, Vaj, it's really amazing how many pieces critical
of TM and MMY you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/23/06 11:35:36 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think from comments I have read in this forum before,
there are a lot of people that want more government
controls over the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/23/06 8:28:21 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All they would have to do is prove they aren't doing the job
they were
hired
to do and they have been given ample warning to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Vaj posted:
Beware the Yoga Demon! The Christian Right's fear of self-
realization
and spirituality
By Mel Seesholtz, Ph.D.
I recall a warning against Hindu exercises on KFUO,
the radio station of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
shempmcgurk wrote:
snip
Concentrated wealth in the hands of those responsible for creating
it is a GREAT thing and should be encourated.
Bhairitu, if you tax it, it goes to government which will NOT use
it wisely.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
shempmcgurk wrote:
snip
Concentrated wealth in the hands of those
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Because
He didn't comply with inspections
So right or wrong information
On whether there was WMD
Is moot
When all Saddy Baby had to do
Was let us in
And inspect
Which he didn't do
Of course, he *did* let the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/25/06 8:56:54 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Of course, he *did* let the inspectors in. Bush
pulled them out even though--or actually, because--
they weren't finding any WMD,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 6/25/06 8:56:54 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
jstein@ writes:
Of course, he *did* let the inspectors in. Bush
pulled them out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
I was just reading in the Times about Richard Grasso,
who, making $12 million a year, went through all kinds
of contortions to obtain
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/25/06 10:43:22 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They were in Iraq, doing their job, right up until Bush
pulled them out so he could invade. They were *furious*.
For Bush to say
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/25/06 10:53:56 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Instead, he noted, We had made a rapid start. We did not have any
obstacles from the Iraqi side in going anywhere. They gave us
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
When rich people talk about money, they're talking
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
snip
Because
He didn't comply with inspections
So right or wrong
1 - 100 of 25156 matches
Mail list logo
