ah, emptybill, I think that's what they call a damned if you do and damned if
you don't!
I know a woman artist, partially Russian, and she learned how to mix her own
paints so that she could create more authentic contemporary icons. If I
remember correctly, the base ingredient was egg whites!
These wall icons are traditional Orthodox murals for older churches and
monasteries. Most Orthodox churches in America don't have the luxury of a wide
population so they don't have many artists trained in following the Orthodox
canons of iconography.
Russia and Greece dominate in this area.
Share
P.S. ... the original artists are either mind-painting up a storm in the
Christian heaven or have been reborn here to dance with the devils.
emptybill, the people who created those gorgeous frescoes. Where are they now?
The people who created such an amazing structure. Are they really gone forever?
On Saturday, December 28, 2013 2:03 PM, "emptyb...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
Better than a painting is this:
http://www.700mountains.
On 12/28/2013 11:42 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
*You know, empty, in some cases when someone tells a malicious lie
about you and you refute it, it's not about your need to be seen in a
certain way but rather about exposing the malice of the liar. And the
liars who try to suggest the former
Emptybill, I sent the photo as a thanks for what you had posted about not
posting (-:
Ok, here's another foetoe: http://i.imgur.com/hH79fKX.jpg
On Saturday, December 28, 2013 11:38 AM, "emptyb...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
Wasn't sent by me but it is a nice picture.
Probably this staged photo
If this was to me, emptybill, thank you.
beautiful photo of monks on a waterfall!
http://i.imgur.com/xqhqDY2.jpg
On Saturday, December 28, 2013 9:19 AM, "emptyb...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
In general I don't reply to the psucho-nuts.
I basically don't care what they say to me or say about me.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
Emptybill and Buck, I've been willing all along to take these kinds of
disagreements off line. However, other posters prefer to keep them online. I
ignore as best as I can. Then they take to butting into my exchanges with
others! A saint I'm no
Xeno, it almost happened again this morning. The post I wanted to reply to was
at the very bottom of the page. But I was careful when I clicked on it and lo
and behold, the scrolling down space opened up on the right side so I was able
to scroll down to the reply option for THAT post. I think ye
Emptybill and Buck, I've been willing all along to take these kinds of
disagreements off line. However, other posters prefer to keep them online. I
ignore as best as I can. Then they take to butting into my exchanges with
others! A saint I'm not! Anyway, even if I totally ignore them, they simpl
We didn't have any trouble emailing each other, did we, Buck?
<< Unless you know another's personal email you cannot do that now Buck. You
used to be able to privately send a message to someone unless they specifically
forbade it, but the Neo interface as it stands does not allow it. >>
Oh, good excuse, Share. Funny, I didn't get the intent that you were asking me
questions in a genuine spirit of wanting to increase understanding, but I
wasn't afraid to answer them.
<< Judy, I'm not afraid of answering any questions that are asked in a genuine
spirit of wanting to increase u
Unless you know another's personal email you cannot do that now Buck. You used
to be able to privately send a message to someone unless they specifically
forbade it, but the Neo interface as it stands does not allow it.
Jeesus please; one just can't invite any polite company over here without these
people starting in again overwhelming the place with their personal
animosities. Could you folks take your personal grievances with each other
off-list and keep it between yourselves? That would be a large kindness
Judy, I'm not afraid of answering any questions that are asked in a genuine
spirit of wanting to increase understanding. This is not the intent I get from
this post of yours, even from the very beginning. And I don't get that from
your previous post either. I think it is pointless to continue co
This doesn't make any sense, Share. If my post was included in another post and
you were able to open that one, you wouldn't need to open mine separately.
And once again, you didn't answer my question, or any of Ann's.
What are you so afraid of?
<< My reply wasn't to you Judy because
Sure Judy. Thanks for the feedback.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
If I were to do what you suggest, how would your view of reality change?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ubP5zHnlrE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ubP5zHnlrE
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 11:13 PM, "awoelflebater@..."
wrote:
Serious, Judy, don't take anything I say seriously.
On 12/27/2013 9:40 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186, nothing he says is to be
taken seriously.
<< You won't find another person with such mental baggage as Judy Stein.
She's been obsessed with Bar
Why, what a surprise!
I'm sure you'd give your interpretation if you thought, after reading the
context I provided, that it had any chance of sounding even halfway plausible.
I believe I told you once that your greatest disability was your moral
cowardice. Obviously that hasn't changed.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
Judy, what are you hoping to accomplish by bringing this up? What is the
result you want?
"It's gotta be all about job creation..."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IE-OCDexYrU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IE-OCDexYrU
On Thursda
Judy, unfortunately this is where dialoguing with you starts to go downhill,
IMO. This has been where parsing, mind reading, and other features set in.
And at the end of the discussion, there is nothing to show for it. Nothing
gained. So, I might take a pass.
The only advice I can offer
My reply wasn't to you Judy because your post was at the very bottom of the
page and I wasn't able to get it to open. Not sure what was going on with that.
On Friday, December 27, 2013 8:04 AM, "authfri...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
<< I ask, Judy because I've never met anyone like you >>
That
On 12/27/2013 8:39 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
To wreck this place so prospective subscribers will stay away?
Says the guy who is working on 200 posts for the week and who is
continually expelling monkeys out of his butt.
Look who is counting and posting dozens of one-line messages that
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186, nothing he says is to be taken
seriously.
<< You won't find another person with such mental baggage as Judy Stein.
She's been obsessed with Barry for over fourteen years on two discussion
forums. Sometimes I think that getting Barry is Judy's m
On 12/27/2013 7:00 AM, Share Long wrote:
> I ask, Judy because I've never met anyone like you and I'd like to
> understand better. I've never encountered such grudge holding in my
> life and again, I'd like to understand better. I don't often encounter
> people so stuck in the past as you and th
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
On 12/26/2013 11:13 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
Sharon, have you ever been raped or raped? Has your mother, your sister? If
they had been how would you like someone describing the rapists as "frisky"?
It's that simpl
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
I ask, Judy because I've never met anyone like you and I'd like to understand
better. I've never encountered such grudge holding in my life and again, I'd
like to understand better. I don't often encounter people so stuck in the past
as you and
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
To wreck this place so prospective subscribers will stay away?
Says the guy who is working on 200 posts for the week and who is continually
expelling monkeys out of his butt.
On 12/26/2013 9:36 PM, Share Long wrote:
Judy, what are yo
On 12/26/2013 11:13 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
Sharon, have you ever been raped or raped? Has your mother, your
sister? If they had been how would you like someone describing the
rapists as "frisky"? It's that simple.
Not every male in India is a rapist, Ann - I'm quite sure that there
<< I ask, Judy because I've never met anyone like you >>
That's a big ditto.
<< and I'd like to understand better. I've never encountered such grudge
holding in my life and again, I'd like to understand better. >>
First thing to do is drop the notion of "grudge holding." That's a
thou
To wreck this place so prospective subscribers will stay away?
On 12/26/2013 9:36 PM, Share Long wrote:
Judy, what are you hoping to accomplish by bringing this up? What is
the result you want?
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:58 PM, Share Long
wrote:
If Judy really thinks so badly of me,
I ask, Judy because I've never met anyone like you and I'd like to understand
better. I've never encountered such grudge holding in my life and again, I'd
like to understand better. I don't often encounter people so stuck in the past
as you and the MGC are. Again, my aim is for more understandin
It's pretty strange that you would have to ask, Share. But since you seem
confused:
The best possible outcome would be for you to take responsibility for having
said something incredibly insensitive and then apologize to the rest of us for
having tried to wiggle out of it before. You could a
And your interpretation is...? (Didn't you see my question?)
Sure Judy, I wouldn't expect you to interpret it in any other way.
When there is an opportunity to frame something in the worst possible way,
it's pretty much guaranteed that you will be first in line.
Or I should say, those
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
Judy, what are you hoping to accomplish by bringing this up? What is the
result you want?
Sharon, have you ever been raped or raped? Has your mother, your sister? If
they had been how would you like someone describing the rapists as "frisky
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
If Judy really thinks so badly of me, then why does she continue to
communicate with me?! It makes no sense and leads me to believe that she has
another motive. Very strange.
I'll tell you what's strange and that's your segue into this next
Judy, what are you hoping to accomplish by bringing this up? What is the result
you want?
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:58 PM, Share Long
wrote:
If Judy really thinks so badly of me, then why does she continue to communicate
with me?! It makes no sense and leads me to believe that
If Judy really thinks so badly of me, then why does she continue to communicate
with me?! It makes no sense and leads me to believe that she has another
motive. Very strange.
Anyway, Steve, how's the skiing? Are the villages looking beautiful?
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:46 PM, "steve.
Sure Judy, I wouldn't expect you to interpret it in any other way.
When there is an opportunity to frame something in the worst possible way,
it's pretty much guaranteed that you will be first in line.
Or I should say, those with whom you have a vendetta.
You may not realize it,,but
Right, the context was Share's preference for punjabis over saris:
"Plus they are practical, meaning one could still flee or er apply one's knee
to a feller's nether regions if he got too frisky. So punjabis I'm guessing
are great for setting boundaries if one is about to experience PhysR ra
Exactly Share. Most everyone knew the context in which you made your comment.
And only those with the most nefarious intent would choose to interpret it in
the way they do.
Quite a shame that people choose to do that.
Even weaker. Of course you didn't "realize" it. After all, if it were a
contest, you might lose.
<< Judy, I didn't realize it was a contest. Go figure! >>
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 4:06 PM, "authfriend@..."
wrote:
Pretty weak, Share. Can't you do any better than this?
<<
Judy, I didn't realize it was a contest. Go figure!
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 4:06 PM, "authfri...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
Pretty weak, Share. Can't you do any better than this?
<< You think this Judy because all of your strategies are your survival
measures! Good job!
Of course you
Pretty weak, Share. Can't you do any better than this?
<< You think this Judy because all of your strategies are your survival
measures! Good job!
Of course you think that, Share. You have to think that. I understand. It's a
survival measure.
Judy, I think there have been many huge str
You think this Judy because all of your strategies are your survival measures!
Good job!
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 3:41 PM, "authfri...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
Of course you think that, Share. You have to think that. I understand. It's a
survival measure.
<< Judy, I think there have
Much better. It was just really funny that you made that particular typo while
blustering about how the standard keyboard never changes.
<< Does your keyboard have the "u" key instead of the "w" key next to the "q"
key? I've used dozens of keyboards in my time, and none of them were "querty"
k
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
On 12/26/2013 11:09 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
Does your keyboard have the "u" key instead of the "w" key next to the "q"
key? I've used dozens of keyboards in my time, and none of them were "querty"
keyboards.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
Judy, this is how you don't face reality, the reality that Ann made a triple
slur. You dig up something that I said months ago. This is also what I mean by
your double standards.
I did no such thing, I was speaking very clearly.
On Thur
On 12/26/2013 11:09 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Does your keyboard have the "u" key instead of the "w" key next to the
"q" key? I've used dozens of keyboards in my time, and none of them
were "querty" keyboards.
Opsie...
Oh my Gawd! The Corrector caught me making a typo. This is
Of course you think that, Share. You have to think that. I understand. It's a
survival measure.
<< Judy, I think there have been many huge stretches on the part of you and
your buddies to give nefarious interpretations to what I've written. >>
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 2:38 PM, Sh
Judy, I think there have been many huge stretches on the part of you and your
buddies to give nefarious interpretations to what I've written.
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 2:38 PM, Share Long
wrote:
Judy, this is how you don't face reality, the reality that Ann made a triple
slur. Y
The point is that it's a huge stretch to claim Ann intended "slurs" on mentally
challenged people or Hispanics with accents. (And "slurs" on Richard are
eminently well deserved; he's made many more and far worse slurs on Ann and me.)
Your trivializing comment about would-be rapists, in contra
Judy, this is how you don't face reality, the reality that Ann made a triple
slur. You dig up something that I said months ago. This is also what I mean by
your double standards.
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 2:05 PM, "authfri...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
I seem to recall your referring to w
I seem to recall your referring to would-be Indian rapists as "frisky." IMHO,
that's about a ten-fer, all in one unbelievably insensitive remark.
But keep going, Share. I'm sure you're impressing Uncle Feste with your .great
integrity.
<< With one nickname, Ricky Retardo, Ann manages to sl
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be
taken seriously.
<< Ann has some pretty deep-seated prejudices - I tried to advise her of this,
but apparently she is under the Judy spell: combative and nasty and just plain
old mean-spirited. She seemed pret
Richard I think Xeno and merudanda are also good writers, in the category of
writers of long and medium sized posts. I think I'm pretty good with the one or
two liners. go figure! (-:
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 12:44 PM, Richard J. Williams
wrote:
Ann has some pretty deep-seated p
Ann has some pretty deep-seated prejudices - I tried to advise her of
this, but apparently she is under the Judy spell: combative and nasty
and just plain old mean-spirited. She seemed pretty nice back when Robin
was around - Iwonder if that had any effect on her writing style.
It looks like w
With one nickname, Ricky Retardo, Ann manages to slur mentally challenged
people; Hispanics who still have an accent; and Richard who, imo, contributes a
lot of good too FFL. I've seen twofers here before, but this is the first
threefor I've seen. Wowzie!
On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 9:35
Because of all the repetition in your posts. You could make a macro of "Go
figure," for instance, and assign it to a single key. No matter how fast you
type, a single key press would be faster.
Thanks for the link,but why in the world would I need a "macro" to post a
reply to you, or to anyo
Thanks for the link,but why in the world would I need a "macro" to post
a reply to you, or to anyone else? Like Barry, I can already key in text
at a very high rate of speed - I've been playing "Letter Invaders" for
twenty years. I will admit using this Toshiba Ultrabook with the
chicklet keys
Creating a phoney "macro" in NEO is much more than just phoney - it's
the sure sign of a poser, desperately seeking attention. Nothing that Ms
Stein posts here is to be taken seriously. NOTHING. Even her "macro" is
a pose! Every nerd on the planet knows you can't create a macro in
Microsoft Not
BTW, Richard, if you'd like to start using macros for all your repetitive text,
here's the macro program I've been using:
http://www.tucows.com/preview/518190/AllKeys-Macro
http://www.tucows.com/preview/518190/AllKeys-Macro
It's free for the first 30 days, then it costs $30 to register it.
Richard shoots himself in both feet:
The only one "going over the edge" here is you, Ms Stein. If creating a phoney
"macro" isn't going over the edge I don't know what is! Nothing I post is to be
taken seriously
Yup, that'll be my new macro.
The only one "going over the edge" here is you, Ms Stein. If creating a
phoney "macro" isn't going over the edge I don't know what is! Nothing I
post is to be taken seriously - this is a chat room for discussion, not
a one-person judge and jury.
Apparently you can't even tell the difference be
On 12/25/2013 9:38 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
Retardo vomited:
"...and now we're left with just a few snarks from you and Ann."
That is a good one considering you have basically taken over the
forum and are posting approximately 25% of the crap here.
Now you're soun
On 12/25/2013 9:35 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
The reason Robin left was because he had much more important things to do
That doesn't say much for Judy, since she's still here posting. Go figure.
You probably know Robin better than anyone here. Does this sound to you
like a parody?
"B
No, Richard, it's trolling and lying, not parody. You want it to be taken
seriously. You want people to react. That's why you went so crazy when I
started using that macro to shut you down. You kept having to think up new
trolls, and finally you went over the edge.
There have been many peopl
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
On 12/25/2013 12:10 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
In any case, I'd rather be obsessive than a lying jackass like you and
Richard. (The "jackass" part is because your lies, and the reasons for your
need to tell them, are so p
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
Thanks for taking up the slack, Feste. Good work! Either Robin is a liar or he
has really put a lot over on this forum. Either way, Robin its a parody of Judy
- she can't seem to understand that she is the butt of everyone's joke and has
been f
No, Judy, it's parody and fun to poke fun at you. You're the only one
taking it seriously.
On 12/25/2013 8:59 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
No, Richard, it's trolling and lying, not parody. You want it to be
taken seriously.
As you know, I've mostly ignored you except when you've told l
On 12/25/2013 12:10 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
*In any case, I'd rather be obsessive than a lying jackass like you
and Richard. (The "jackass" part is because your lies, and the reasons
for your need to tell them, are so pathetically transparent.)*
You're not being a very good example of a
No, Richard, it's trolling and lying, not parody. You want it to be taken
seriously.
As you know, I've mostly ignored you except when you've told lies that some of
those here might not recognize as such. This past couple of weeks you've gone
so far out on a limb with your trolling and lying
On 12/25/2013 6:16 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote:
> You are wasting you time. Judy draws her pistol at just the word "you".
Congratulations, Bill, you are now on Judy's shoot list. Welcome to the
New World Order of the Our Dear Leader, where nothing is at seems and
nothing seems like it is, and w
Thanks for taking up the slack, Feste. Good work! Either Robin is a liar
or he has really put a lot over on this forum. Either way, Robin its a
parody of Judy - she can't seem to understand that she is the butt of
everyone's joke and has been for years. If what Robin said was a parody,
Judy see
Almost 99% of everything I've posted to this forum for the past ten
years has been parody, Judy, but you are too stupid to realize that. The
difference between you and me and Robin is that you actually take this
stuff seriously. Go figure.
And, not only seriously, but as something that is dire
Feste suppurated:
<< Just one of your innumerable problems, auth, is that you are so obsessed
with attacking other people that you lose all clarity of judgment. You
attribute the worst of motives and intentions to others when such is not the
case. It is quite possible that I have misremember
Just one of your innumerable problems, auth, is that you are so obsessed with
attacking other people that you lose all clarity of judgment. You attribute the
worst of motives and intentions to others when such is not the case. It is
quite possible that I have misremembered something I wrote here
Difference is, Robin wasn't so stupid as to think others were stupid enough to
take (or pretend to take) his parody seriously. Obviously he was wrong in
Feste's, Vaj's, and your cases, though.
<< So, when a Canadian posts fibs, he is posting a parody; when two guys from
Texas post fibs, they
(Gee, Feste, did you maybe wonder whether I might be responding to something
not-so-full of festive cheer and kind words?)
In any case, I'd rather be obsessive than a lying jackass like you and
Richard. (The "jackass" part is because your lies, and the reasons for your
need to tell them, are
On 12/25/2013 10:07 AM, feste37 wrote:
> So here comes The Obsessive on Christmas Day, full of festive cheer
> and kind words.
You and Share are going to have to take up the slack here for awhile,
Feste. We are going to a Christmas party hosted by a guy that is Jewish,
married to a Baptist, and
"I am not expecting Barry to exonerate me from my past dealings with
him; I don't even say he has to believe me in what I say here. But I can
only say that those who have followed me in all my posts at FFL will
recognize that in this instance, because I am going so much against the
natural dire
So, when a Canadian posts fibs, he is posting a parody; when two guys
from Texas post fibs, they are liars. Thanks for pointing that out -
that might help explain why you seem so prejudiced against Texans. Go
figure.
On 12/25/2013 10:03 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org
So here comes The Obsessive on Christmas Day, full of festive cheer and kind
words.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough in the past
couple of days to know you and Feste are lying jackasses. No need to go back
any further
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parody http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parody
If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough in the past
couple of days to know you and Feste are lying jackasses. No need to go back
any further than that.
Just in case they are still interested there'
On 12/25/2013 9:25 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
*If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough in the
past couple of days to know you and Feste are lying jackasses. No need
to go back any further than that.*
Just in case they are still interested there's this from the same
If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough in the past couple
of days to know you and Feste are lying jackasses. No need to go back any
further than that.
<< Judy, I don't think anyone is interested in why Robin did or didn't dump
you. If they were, they could go back and re
Judy, I don't think anyone is interested in why Robin did or didn't dump
you. If they were, they could go back and re-read all of Robin's
messages. Go figure.
On 12/24/2013 10:38 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
<< Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was Robin's
purported
Right. Just as I described. And from then on, Robin was Barry's devoted
disciple, wasn't he? That's how we know he was serious.
And here are links to Robin's full post (at the bottom of 301020) and the rest
of the exchange that I've already posted:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Fairf
On 12/24/2013 10:38 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Do you suppose Richard is so far gone he didn't notice that what he
quoted from Robin's post confirmed what I had just said that he called
a fib?
"I am sorry, Judy, but Saul was sincere in his persecution of those
Christians too; but after Chr
<< Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was Robin's purported
defection from me to Barry. At some point you are going to have to face
reality, Judy. The first step in this direction would to stop the fibbing.
Then, and only then will you ever persuade anyone on this forum that you ar
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
That was a pretty good post of mine, but I have no idea at all of whether the
stuff between you and Robin was serious or not. That was just my reaction at
that moment to a few posts. I do recall others in which Robin disparaged you in
strong te
On 12/24/2013 10:00 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was Robin's purported
defection from me to Barry.
At some point you are going to have to face reality, Judy. The first
step in this direction would to stop the fibbing. Then, and only then
will
> > And of course it is always YOU who has the integrity and OTHERS who
lack it
> >
On 12/24/2013 9:50 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Bullshit. You knew very well it wasn't serious.
It's ALWAYS Judy that has the integrity, even when it's plain as day
that Robin didn't think so.
<< That was a pretty good post of mine, but I have no idea at all of whether
the stuff between you and Robin was serious or not. That was just my reaction
at that moment to a few posts. >>
Yes, it was a pretty good post. Let's just put it up again, shall we? The
links below are to the exchan
Feste squirmed:
<< That was a pretty good post of mine, but I have no idea at all of whether
the stuff between you and Robin was serious or not. >>
Bullshit. You knew very well it wasn't serious. You'd never have written like
that if you'd thought it was; more to the point, you couldn't ha
On 12/24/2013 9:12 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
Yessiree, Richard really picked up on the truth here.
It was just embarrassing!
On 12/24/2013 7:38 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
This is all trolling and lying, stuff Richard made up
Let's just say Robin was less than impressed...
That was a pretty good post of mine, but I have no idea at all of whether the
stuff between you and Robin was serious or not. That was just my reaction at
that moment to a few posts. I do recall others in which Robin disparaged you in
strong terms. Whether he meant it or not, only he can say. I
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
No, let's say this (if I can stop laughing long enough to hit the macro key):
This is all trolling and lying, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except
Xeno and, obviously, Richard) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed
refut
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
