Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Five, six, and seven for Feste
ah, emptybill, I think that's what they call a damned if you do and damned if you don't! I know a woman artist, partially Russian, and she learned how to mix her own paints so that she could create more authentic contemporary icons. If I remember correctly, the base ingredient was egg whites! On Saturday, December 28, 2013 6:34 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote: Share P.S. ... the original artists are either mind-painting up a storm in the Christian heaven or have been reborn here to dance with the devils.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Emptybill and Buck, I've been willing all along to take these kinds of disagreements off line. However, other posters prefer to keep them online. I ignore as best as I can. Then they take to butting into my exchanges with others! A saint I'm not! Anyway, even if I totally ignore them, they simply find another ankle to bite! Any more suggestions very welcome. On Friday, December 27, 2013 7:15 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote: Great idea Buck. Combatants can create an alternate Yahoo email i.d. to communicate their hateful, malevolent thoughts about each other. Vaj and I knew each others actual alternate Yahoo i.d. We disagreed about many things TM but sometimes took it off the mat to clarity a point of agreement or disagreement. By being away from the preview of other people, the conversations became more about a comparison of viewpoints rather mere quarreling. That means the disputants on FFL today are flagellating each other to show off ... both to each other and to other FFL posters. Nothing else going on here but flagrant ego-ejaculations all over everyone else on the forum. Give us a break! Some people might come back once they know they can avoid having to listen to the endless smack-downs by the psucho-nuts.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Xeno, it almost happened again this morning. The post I wanted to reply to was at the very bottom of the page. But I was careful when I clicked on it and lo and behold, the scrolling down space opened up on the right side so I was able to scroll down to the reply option for THAT post. I think yesterday I must have missed the space opening up. On Friday, December 27, 2013 4:39 PM, anartax...@yahoo.com anartax...@yahoo.com wrote: Yahoo's Neo seemed to have some trouble today in message view, I could get only the first and last messages in the thread to show up. This seems to have been a glitch in JavaScript or CSS, as posts in the thread load but are hidden from view (looking at the source code of the page showed that more messages loaded than were initially displayed). Yahoo seems to have fixed it. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: My reply wasn't to you Judy because your post was at the very bottom of the page and I wasn't able to get it to open. Not sure what was going on with that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Five, six, and seven for Feste
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, sharelong60@... wrote:
Emptybill and Buck, I've been willing all along to take these kinds of
disagreements off line. However, other posters prefer to keep them online. I
ignore as best as I can. Then they take to butting into my exchanges with
others! A saint I'm not! Anyway, even if I totally ignore them, they simply
find another ankle to bite! Any more suggestions very welcome.
Just be thankful you aren't a centipede.
I have some suggestions, you wanna hear them? Oh, I forgot, you never read my
posts. At least you can't accuse me of ankle biting, whatever that is. Ever
had your toes sucked though?
On Friday, December 27, 2013 7:15 PM, emptybill@... emptybill@... wrote:
Great idea Buck.
Combatants can create an alternate Yahoo email i.d. to communicate their
hateful, malevolent thoughts about each other.
Vaj and I knew each others actual alternate Yahoo i.d.
We disagreed about many things TM but sometimes took
it off the mat to clarity a point of agreement or disagreement.
By being away from the preview of other people, the conversations
became more about a comparison of viewpoints rather mere quarreling.
That means the disputants on FFL today are flagellating each other to show off
... both to each other and to other FFL posters.
Nothing else going on here but flagrant ego-ejaculations all over everyone
else on the forum.
Give us a break!
Some people might come back once they know they can avoid having to listen to
the endless smack-downs by the psucho-nuts.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Five, six, and seven for Feste
If this was to me, emptybill, thank you. beautiful photo of monks on a waterfall! http://i.imgur.com/xqhqDY2.jpg On Saturday, December 28, 2013 9:19 AM, emptyb...@yahoo.com emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote: In general I don't reply to the psucho-nuts. I basically don't care what they say to me or say about me. That is because they lack standing. I am not alone is consigning them to the class of people who are willfully engaged at being outraged. My advise is to realize that your need to be seen in a proper way is a weakness. People's attitudes change over time - sometimes 180 degrees. Abandon that need and you can communicate as you wish without concern for anyone else. If you want to clarify something then do so but rest in the understanding that the hateful, malevolent thoughts they express are a form of violence you don't need to be involved in dealing with to protect yourself. Sorry for the clunky syntax. Gotta run.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Emptybill, I sent the photo as a thanks for what you had posted about not posting (-: Ok, here's another foetoe: http://i.imgur.com/hH79fKX.jpg On Saturday, December 28, 2013 11:38 AM, emptyb...@yahoo.com emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote: Wasn't sent by me but it is a nice picture. Probably this staged photo was part of a $ deal with the money going to the monastery. However since they seem to be Tibetan monks they proly kept the $ for themselves. Why else risk falling?
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Five, six, and seven for Feste
On 12/28/2013 11:42 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *You know, empty, in some cases when someone tells a malicious lie about you and you refute it, it's not about your need to be seen in a certain way but rather about exposing the malice of the liar. And the liars who try to suggest the former (e.g., Barry) are the ones who don't want to be seen a certain way* A parody can be untrue if you interpret it that way, and sometimes irony can be seen as a lie. It's all in the mind of the beholder. You might disagree with someone's opinion, and that's your right, but it is wrong of you to think of somebody's opinion as malicious, even if you think it was directed at you. It's probably not at all healthy for you to remain in this state - you're not going to resolve a dispute by posting to a chat room - many times you are just going to make thinks worse. That's what I think.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Five, six, and seven for Feste
emptybill, the people who created those gorgeous frescoes. Where are they now? The people who created such an amazing structure. Are they really gone forever? On Saturday, December 28, 2013 2:03 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote: Better than a painting is this: http://www.700mountains.org/2012/08/the-divine-meteora-of-greece/
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Share P.S. ... the original artists are either mind-painting up a storm in the Christian heaven or have been reborn here to dance with the devils.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Five, six, and seven for Feste
These wall icons are traditional Orthodox murals for older churches and monasteries. Most Orthodox churches in America don't have the luxury of a wide population so they don't have many artists trained in following the Orthodox canons of iconography. Russia and Greece dominate in this area.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
I ask, Judy because I've never met anyone like you and I'd like to understand
better. I've never encountered such grudge holding in my life and again, I'd
like to understand better. I don't often encounter people so stuck in the past
as you and the MGC are. Again, my aim is for more understanding. This is why I
ask what you hope to accomplish.
If I were to do what you suggest, how would your view of reality change?
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 11:13 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com
awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, sharelong60@... wrote:
Judy, what are you hoping to accomplish by bringing this up? What is the result
you want?
Sharon, have you ever been raped or raped? Has your mother, your sister? If
they had been how would you like someone describing the rapists as frisky?
It's that simple.
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:58 PM, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote:
If Judy really thinks so badly of me, then why does she continue to communicate
with me?! It makes no sense and leads me to believe that she has another
motive. Very strange.
Anyway, Steve, how's the skiing? Are the villages looking beautiful?
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:46 PM, steve.sundur@... steve.sundur@...
wrote:
Sure Judy, I wouldn't expect you to interpret it in any other way.
When there is an opportunity to frame something in the worst possible way, it's
pretty much guaranteed that you will be first in line.
Or I should say, those with whom you have a vendetta.
You may not realize it,,but this is a major reason why people stay away from
here.
Of course, I think there are many positive contributions you make, but on
balance, I think it tends to stay pretty ugly.
Maybe those two pictures in the photo section do actually capture two big
facets of your personality.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
Right, the context was Share's preference for punjabis over saris:
Plus they are practical, meaning one could still flee or er apply one's knee
to a feller's nether regions if he got too frisky. So punjabis I'm guessing
are great for setting boundaries if one is about to experience PhysR rather
than PsyR or EmoR. I'm just sayin. (That's a reference, BTW, to her having
accused Robin of psychological rape, another very ugly story involving
Share.) IOW, got too frisky here refers to attempted rape.
Curtis was confused, thinking she was referring to Fairfield. She corrected him:
Oh, I meant the women in India. From recent news reports there seems to be a
lot of hyper frisky fellers there.
She was referring to an NPR story Buck had linked to about the terrible
problems India was having with rape (including murderous rape--one of the
recent victims was 4 years old).
She later claimed calling the Indian rapists frisky fellers had been a joke.
I kid you not, folks. This is what Steve is trying to defend her from.
The NPR story is here:
http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment
I can give you links to any of the posts I quoted.
(I can also refer you to one of the very ugliest posts I've ever seen on FFL.
It's from Curtis, also attempting to defend Share, and it's truly sickening.
Only someone with a disturbed mind could have written it.)
Steve wrote:
Exactly Share. Most everyone knew the context in which you made your comment.
And only those with the most nefarious intent would choose to interpret it in
the way they do.
Why don't you tell us what your interpretation was, Steve? I've given you the
context; go to it.
Quite a shame that people choose to do that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
To wreck this place so prospective subscribers will stay away?
On 12/26/2013 9:36 PM, Share Long wrote:
Judy, what are you hoping to accomplish by bringing this up? What is
the result you want?
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:58 PM, Share Long
sharelon...@yahoo.com wrote:
If Judy really thinks so badly of me, then why does she continue to
communicate with me?! It makes no sense and leads me to believe that
she has another motive. Very strange.
Anyway, Steve, how's the skiing? Are the villages looking beautiful?
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:46 PM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com
steve.sun...@yahoo.com wrote:
Sure Judy, I wouldn't expect you to interpret it in any other way.
When there is an opportunity to frame something in the worst possible
way, it's pretty much guaranteed that you will be first in line.
Or I should say, those with whom you have a vendetta.
You may not realize it,,but this is a major reason why people stay
away from here.
Of course, I think there are many positive contributions you make, but
on balance, I think it tends to stay pretty ugly.
Maybe those two pictures in the photo section do actually capture two
big facets of your personality.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
Right, the context was Share's preference for punjabis over saris:
Plus they are practical, meaning one could still flee or er apply
one's knee to a feller's nether regions if he got too frisky. So
punjabis I'm guessing are great for setting boundaries if one is about
to experience PhysR rather than PsyR or EmoR. I'm just sayin.
(That's a reference, BTW, to her having accused Robin of
psychological rape, another very ugly story involving Share.) IOW,
got too frisky here refers to attempted rape.
Curtis was confused, thinking she was referring to Fairfield. She
corrected him:
Oh, I meant the women in India. From recent news reports there seems
to be a lot of hyper frisky fellers there.
She was referring to an NPR story Buck had linked to about the
terrible problems India was having with rape (including murderous
rape--one of the recent victims was 4 years old).
She later claimed calling the Indian rapists frisky fellers had been
a joke.
I kid you not, folks. This is what Steve is trying to defend her from.
The NPR story is here:
http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment
I can give you links to any of the posts I quoted.
(I can also refer you to one of the very ugliest posts I've ever seen
on FFL. It's from Curtis, also attempting to defend Share, and it's
truly sickening. Only someone with a disturbed mind could have written
it.)
Steve wrote:
Exactly Share. Most everyone knew the context in which you made your
comment. And only those with the most nefarious intent would choose to
interpret it in the way they do.
Why don't you tell us what your interpretation was, Steve? I've given
you the context; go to it.
Quite a shame that people choose to do that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
I ask, Judy because I've never met anyone like you That's a big ditto. and I'd like to understand better. I've never encountered such grudge holding in my life and again, I'd like to understand better. First thing to do is drop the notion of grudge holding. That's a thought-stopper that is designed to block understanding. I don't often encounter people so stuck in the past as you and the MGC are. And drop the MGC idea. There is no such thing. Use people's names. Next drop the stuck in the past notion, because that isn't true either. Again, my aim is for more understanding. No, it isn't. Your aim is to find a way to protect yourself from understanding while attacking me and preserve what you've already decided is the case, as everything you've said so far in this post proves. This is why I ask what you hope to accomplish. I don't have any hope of getting you to do the right thing. If I were to do what you suggest, how would your view of reality change? I don't believe you are capable of taking responsibility for what you do and say. If you suddenly did, I'd be astonished. I note that you're responding to a post from Ann rather than one from me. But you haven't responded to what she said in her post: Sharon, have you ever been raped or raped? Has your mother, your sister? If they had been how would you like someone describing the rapists as frisky? It's that simple. Finally, did you read the account of the context of your frisky fellers remark I gave to Steve? Do you agree that it's accurate? Here it is again: Right, the context was Share's preference for punjabis over saris: Plus they are practical, meaning one could still flee or er apply one's knee to a feller's nether regions if he got too frisky. So punjabis I'm guessing are great for setting boundaries if one is about to experience PhysR rather than PsyR or EmoR. I'm just sayin. (That's a reference, BTW, to her having accused Robin of psychological rape, another very ugly story involving Share.) IOW, got too frisky here refers to attempted rape. Curtis was confused, thinking she was referring to Fairfield. She corrected him: Oh, I meant the women in India. From recent news reports there seems to be a lot of hyper frisky fellers there. She was referring to an NPR story Buck had linked to about the terrible problems India was having with rape (including murderous rape--one of the recent victims was 4 years old). She later claimed calling the Indian rapists frisky fellers had been a joke. I kid you not, folks. This is what Steve is trying to defend her from. The NPR story is here: http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment I can give you links to any of the posts I quoted.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
On 12/26/2013 11:13 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: Sharon, have you ever been raped or raped? Has your mother, your sister? If they had been how would you like someone describing the rapists as frisky? It's that simple. Not every male in India is a rapist, Ann - I'm quite sure that there are probably some frisky men over there, just like everywhere else. Never pass up a tragedy if you can use it to discredit your debating opponent! First rule of snark.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
To wreck this place so prospective subscribers will stay away?
Says the guy who is working on 200 posts for the week and who is continually
expelling monkeys out of his butt.
On 12/26/2013 9:36 PM, Share Long wrote:
Judy, what are you hoping to accomplish by bringing this up? What is the
result you want?
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:58 PM, Share Long sharelong60@...
mailto:sharelong60@... wrote:
If Judy really thinks so badly of me, then why does she continue to
communicate with me?! It makes no sense and leads me to believe that she has
another motive. Very strange.
Anyway, Steve, how's the skiing? Are the villages looking beautiful?
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:46 PM, steve.sundur@...
mailto:steve.sundur@... steve.sundur@... mailto:steve.sundur@... wrote:
Sure Judy, I wouldn't expect you to interpret it in any other way.
When there is an opportunity to frame something in the worst possible way,
it's pretty much guaranteed that you will be first in line.
Or I should say, those with whom you have a vendetta.
You may not realize it,,but this is a major reason why people stay away from
here.
Of course, I think there are many positive contributions you make, but on
balance, I think it tends to stay pretty ugly.
Maybe those two pictures in the photo section do actually capture two big
facets of your personality.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@...
wrote:
Right, the context was Share's preference for punjabis over saris:
Plus they are practical, meaning one could still flee or er apply one's knee
to a feller's nether regions if he got too frisky. So punjabis I'm guessing
are great for setting boundaries if one is about to experience PhysR rather
than PsyR or EmoR. I'm just sayin. (That's a reference, BTW, to her having
accused Robin of psychological rape, another very ugly story involving
Share.) IOW, got too frisky here refers to attempted rape.
Curtis was confused, thinking she was referring to Fairfield. She corrected
him:
Oh, I meant the women in India. From recent news reports there seems to be a
lot of hyper frisky fellers there.
She was referring to an NPR story Buck had linked to about the terrible
problems India was having with rape (including murderous rape--one of the
recent victims was 4 years old).
She later claimed calling the Indian rapists frisky fellers had been a
joke.
I kid you not, folks. This is what Steve is trying to defend her from.
The NPR story is here:
http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment
http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment
I can give you links to any of the posts I quoted.
(I can also refer you to one of the very ugliest posts I've ever seen on FFL.
It's from Curtis, also attempting to defend Share, and it's truly sickening.
Only someone with a disturbed mind could have written it.)
Steve wrote:
Exactly Share. Most everyone knew the context in which you made your comment.
And only those with the most nefarious intent would choose to interpret it in
the way they do.
Why don't you tell us what your interpretation was, Steve? I've given you the
context; go to it.
Quite a shame that people choose to do that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, sharelong60@... wrote:
I ask, Judy because I've never met anyone like you and I'd like to understand
better. I've never encountered such grudge holding in my life and again, I'd
like to understand better. I don't often encounter people so stuck in the past
as you and the MGC are. Again, my aim is for more understanding. This is why I
ask what you hope to accomplish.
If I were to do what you suggest, how would your view of reality change?
I think it might be easier if you just answer my question first. Have you ever
been raped, Sharon? Has your mother or sister ever been raped? And if so, how
would you feel, what would you think of the person who said the rapist and/or
murderer was merely being frisky?
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 11:13 PM, awoelflebater@...
awoelflebater@... wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, sharelong60@... wrote:
Judy, what are you hoping to accomplish by bringing this up? What is the
result you want?
Sharon, have you ever been raped or raped? Has your mother, your sister? If
they had been how would you like someone describing the rapists as frisky?
It's that simple.
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:58 PM, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote:
If Judy really thinks so badly of me, then why does she continue to
communicate with me?! It makes no sense and leads me to believe that she has
another motive. Very strange.
Anyway, Steve, how's the skiing? Are the villages looking beautiful?
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:46 PM, steve.sundur@... steve.sundur@...
wrote:
Sure Judy, I wouldn't expect you to interpret it in any other way.
When there is an opportunity to frame something in the worst possible way,
it's pretty much guaranteed that you will be first in line.
Or I should say, those with whom you have a vendetta.
You may not realize it,,but this is a major reason why people stay away from
here.
Of course, I think there are many positive contributions you make, but on
balance, I think it tends to stay pretty ugly.
Maybe those two pictures in the photo section do actually capture two big
facets of your personality.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
Right, the context was Share's preference for punjabis over saris:
Plus they are practical, meaning one could still flee or er apply one's knee
to a feller's nether regions if he got too frisky. So punjabis I'm guessing
are great for setting boundaries if one is about to experience PhysR rather
than PsyR or EmoR. I'm just sayin. (That's a reference, BTW, to her having
accused Robin of psychological rape, another very ugly story involving
Share.) IOW, got too frisky here refers to attempted rape.
Curtis was confused, thinking she was referring to Fairfield. She corrected
him:
Oh, I meant the women in India. From recent news reports there seems to be a
lot of hyper frisky fellers there.
She was referring to an NPR story Buck had linked to about the terrible
problems India was having with rape (including murderous rape--one of the
recent victims was 4 years old).
She later claimed calling the Indian rapists frisky fellers had been a
joke.
I kid you not, folks. This is what Steve is trying to defend her from.
The NPR story is here:
http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment
http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment
I can give you links to any of the posts I quoted.
(I can also refer you to one of the very ugliest posts I've ever seen on FFL.
It's from Curtis, also attempting to defend Share, and it's truly sickening.
Only someone with a disturbed mind could have written it.)
Steve wrote:
Exactly Share. Most everyone knew the context in which you made your comment.
And only those with the most nefarious intent would choose to interpret it in
the way they do.
Why don't you tell us what your interpretation was, Steve? I've given you the
context; go to it.
Quite a shame that people choose to do that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
On 12/26/2013 11:13 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
Sharon, have you ever been raped or raped? Has your mother, your sister? If
they had been how would you like someone describing the rapists as frisky?
It's that simple. Not every male in India is a rapist, Ann - I'm quite sure
that there are probably some frisky men over there, just like everywhere
else. Never pass up a tragedy if you can use it to discredit your debating
opponent! First rule of snark.
Comment of the week made by none other than our resident Einstein and top
poster.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
On 12/27/2013 7:00 AM, Share Long wrote: I ask, Judy because I've never met anyone like you and I'd like to understand better. I've never encountered such grudge holding in my life and again, I'd like to understand better. I don't often encounter people so stuck in the past as you and the MGC are. Again, my aim is for more understanding. This is why I ask what you hope to accomplish. You won't find another person with such mental baggage as Judy Stein. She's been obsessed with Barry for over fourteen years on two discussion forums. Sometimes I think that getting Barry is Judy's main goal in life. She sure doesn't post much about her daily life or what she does other than post to this internet forum. With the amount of posting she does, I don't see how she could get any of her professional work accomplished. And, the response times are remarkable - it's like she is at her computer all day and into the evening, sometimes way past midnight. Maybe Judy has a laptop she can take into her living room so as not to miss anything. And, a smartphone to take into the bathroom just in case. Who knows? From what I've read, any computer project requires at minimum about two hours of real focus time in order to make any significant progress toward completion. But, just looking at Judy's response time, it's obvious she is multi-tasking a lot - unless maybe she doesn't have any work to do this time of year. But, you'd think she would at least take time out to go grocery shopping or to take a walk on the beach. no figure. I would not be surprised if Judy goes to bed at night and dreams of posting something to refute Barry - and gets up really early to compose some message to post to try and get him. Seriously. If I were to do what you suggest, how would your view of reality change? I've been reading Judy's messages since about 1998 and I've seen a change over that length of time. You can go back and read the archives on Usenet and you will see that she used to be quite good at dialoging on discussion groups. But, in the last few years there hs been a steady decrease in her cogent messaging, to the point these days that it' almost total self-defense, often resorting to one-line snarks and then down to the point of creating macros to help her cope. Go figure.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186, nothing he says is to be taken seriously. You won't find another person with such mental baggage as Judy Stein. She's been obsessed with Barry for over fourteen years on two discussion forums. Sometimes I think that getting Barry is Judy's main goal in life. She sure doesn't post much about her daily life or what she does other than post to this internet forum. With the amount of posting she does, I don't see how she could get any of her professional work accomplished. And, the response times are remarkable - it's like she is at her computer all day and into the evening, sometimes way past midnight. Maybe Judy has a laptop she can take into her living room so as not to miss anything. And, a smartphone to take into the bathroom just in case. Who knows? From what I've read, any computer project requires at minimum about two hours of real focus time in order to make any significant progress toward completion. But, just looking at Judy's response time, it's obvious she is multi-tasking a lot - unless maybe she doesn't have any work to do this time of year. But, you'd think she would at least take time out to go grocery shopping or to take a walk on the beach. no figure. I would not be surprised if Judy goes to bed at night and dreams of posting something to refute Barry - and gets up really early to compose some message to post to try and get him. Seriously. If I were to do what you suggest, how would your view of reality change? I've been reading Judy's messages since about 1998 and I've seen a change over that length of time. You can go back and read the archives on Usenet and you will see that she used to be quite good at dialoging on discussion groups. But, in the last few years there hs been a steady decrease in her cogent messaging, to the point these days that it' almost total self-defense, often resorting to one-line snarks and then down to the point of creating macros to help her cope. Go figure.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
On 12/27/2013 8:39 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: To wreck this place so prospective subscribers will stay away? Says the guy who is working on 200 posts for the week and who is continually expelling monkeys out of his butt. Look who is counting and posting dozens of one-line messages that mostly make no sense and are mostly composed of snark and ankle-biting. When was the last time Ann posted anything that was interesting to read or that added anything to the general discussion? The informants Judy and Ann are not being very good informants lately. These two are good examples of why posting limits were enforced by the owner of the discussion group. There were way too many one-line snarks being posted, one right after the other, with hardly zero response from the perpetrators themselves. There were a Several respondents that wrecked the place causing many of the good informants to just leave out of sheer frustration. So, Rick instituted posting limits. He probably won't do that again, and so now the ankle-biters have run amuck again, trying to monopolize the entire conversation for their own amusement. At least I'm posting some on-topic messages every day to try and compensate for my own obsessiveness - I'm not all bad. Sometimes posting to discussion forums brings out some the worst aspects of a person's personality. So, I'm working on trying to balance my own obsessive behavior. I'm still on the program, doing the work and most of the heavy lifting around here. Share and Buck go to the dome for group meditation almost every day, and I'm going to the Y to try and improve my Body, Spirit and Mind, but who knows what Judy and Ann are doing? Go figure. The simple solution to this is for Judy and Ann to just STFU about Richard.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
My reply wasn't to you Judy because your post was at the very bottom of the page and I wasn't able to get it to open. Not sure what was going on with that. On Friday, December 27, 2013 8:04 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: I ask, Judy because I've never met anyone like you That's a big ditto. and I'd like to understand better. I've never encountered such grudge holding in my life and again, I'd like to understand better. First thing to do is drop the notion of grudge holding. That's a thought-stopper that is designed to block understanding. I don't often encounter people so stuck in the past as you and the MGC are. And drop the MGC idea. There is no such thing. Use people's names. Next drop the stuck in the past notion, because that isn't true either. Again, my aim is for more understanding. No, it isn't. Your aim is to find a way to protect yourself from understanding while attacking me and preserve what you've already decided is the case, as everything you've said so far in this post proves. This is why I ask what you hope to accomplish. I don't have any hope of getting you to do the right thing. If I were to do what you suggest, how would your view of reality change? I don't believe you are capable of taking responsibility for what you do and say. If you suddenly did, I'd be astonished. I note that you're responding to a post from Ann rather than one from me. But you haven't responded to what she said in her post: Sharon, have you ever been raped or raped? Has your mother, your sister? If they had been how would you like someone describing the rapists as frisky? It's that simple. Finally, did you read the account of the context of your frisky fellers remark I gave to Steve? Do you agree that it's accurate? Here it is again: Right, the context was Share's preference for punjabis over saris: Plus they are practical, meaning one could still flee or er apply one's knee to a feller's nether regions if he got too frisky. So punjabis I'm guessing are great for setting boundaries if one is about to experience PhysR rather than PsyR or EmoR. I'm just sayin. (That's a reference, BTW, to her having accused Robin of psychological rape, another very ugly story involving Share.) IOW, got too frisky here refers to attempted rape. Curtis was confused, thinking she was referring to Fairfield. She corrected him: Oh, I meant the women in India. From recent news reports there seems to be a lot of hyper frisky fellers there. She was referring to an NPR story Buck had linked to about the terrible problems India was having with rape (including murderous rape--one of the recent victims was 4 years old). She later claimed calling the Indian rapists frisky fellers had been a joke. I kid you not, folks. This is what Steve is trying to defend her from. The NPR story is here: http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment I can give you links to any of the posts I quoted.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Judy, unfortunately this is where dialoguing with you starts to go downhill, IMO. This has been where parsing, mind reading, and other features set in. And at the end of the discussion, there is nothing to show for it. Nothing gained. So, I might take a pass. The only advice I can offer is to perhaps broaden the range of possibilities of meaning in what a person might be saying. You might see things differently. But I don't really see that happening. I'm afraid it wouldn't offer near the satisfaction as your present means of interacting. That is to say, the two standard model.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, sharelong60@... wrote:
Judy, what are you hoping to accomplish by bringing this up? What is the
result you want?
It's gotta be all about job creation...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IE-OCDexYrU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IE-OCDexYrU
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:58 PM, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote:
If Judy really thinks so badly of me, then why does she continue to
communicate with me?! It makes no sense and leads me to believe that she has
another motive. Very strange.
Anyway, Steve, how's the skiing? Are the villages looking beautiful?
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:46 PM, steve.sundur@... steve.sundur@...
wrote:
Sure Judy, I wouldn't expect you to interpret it in any other way.
When there is an opportunity to frame something in the worst possible way,
it's pretty much guaranteed that you will be first in line.
Or I should say, those with whom you have a vendetta.
You may not realize it,,but this is a major reason why people stay away from
here.
Of course, I think there are many positive contributions you make, but on
balance, I think it tends to stay pretty ugly.
Maybe those two pictures in the photo section do actually capture two big
facets of your personality.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
Right, the context was Share's preference for punjabis over saris:
Plus they are practical, meaning one could still flee or er apply one's knee
to a feller's nether regions if he got too frisky. So punjabis I'm guessing
are great for setting boundaries if one is about to experience PhysR rather
than PsyR or EmoR. I'm just sayin. (That's a reference, BTW, to her having
accused Robin of psychological rape, another very ugly story involving
Share.) IOW, got too frisky here refers to attempted rape.
Curtis was confused, thinking she was referring to Fairfield. She corrected
him:
Oh, I meant the women in India. From recent news reports there seems to be a
lot of hyper frisky fellers there.
She was referring to an NPR story Buck had linked to about the terrible
problems India was having with rape (including murderous rape--one of the
recent victims was 4 years old).
She later claimed calling the Indian rapists frisky fellers had been a
joke.
I kid you not, folks. This is what Steve is trying to defend her from.
The NPR story is here:
http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment
http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment
I can give you links to any of the posts I quoted.
(I can also refer you to one of the very ugliest posts I've ever seen on FFL.
It's from Curtis, also attempting to defend Share, and it's truly sickening.
Only someone with a disturbed mind could have written it.)
Steve wrote:
Exactly Share. Most everyone knew the context in which you made your comment.
And only those with the most nefarious intent would choose to interpret it in
the way they do.
Why don't you tell us what your interpretation was, Steve? I've given you the
context; go to it.
Quite a shame that people choose to do that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Why, what a surprise! I'm sure you'd give your interpretation if you thought, after reading the context I provided, that it had any chance of sounding even halfway plausible. I believe I told you once that your greatest disability was your moral cowardice. Obviously that hasn't changed. Judy, unfortunately this is where dialoguing with you starts to go downhill, IMO. This has been where parsing, mind reading, and other features set in. And at the end of the discussion, there is nothing to show for it. Nothing gained. So, I might take a pass. The only advice I can offer is to perhaps broaden the range of possibilities of meaning in what a person might be saying. You might see things differently. But I don't really see that happening. I'm afraid it wouldn't offer near the satisfaction as your present means of interacting. That is to say, the two standard model.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Serious, Judy, don't take anything I say seriously. On 12/27/2013 9:40 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: As Richard himself admitted in post #368186, nothing he says is to be taken seriously. You won't find another person with such mental baggage as Judy Stein. She's been obsessed with Barry for over fourteen years on two discussion forums. Sometimes I think that getting Barry is Judy's main goal in life. She sure doesn't post much about her daily life or what she does other than post to this internet forum. With the amount of posting she does, I don't see how she could get any of her professional work accomplished. And, the response times are remarkable - it's like she is at her computer all day and into the evening, sometimes way past midnight. Maybe Judy has a laptop she can take into her living room so as not to miss anything. And, a smartphone to take into the bathroom just in case. Who knows? From what I've read, any computer project requires at minimum about two hours of real focus time in order to make any significant progress toward completion. But, just looking at Judy's response time, it's obvious she is multi-tasking a lot - unless maybe she doesn't have any work to do this time of year. But, you'd think she would at least take time out to go grocery shopping or to take a walk on the beach. no figure. I would not be surprised if Judy goes to bed at night and dreams of posting something to refute Barry - and gets up really early to compose some message to post to try and get him. Seriously. If I were to do what you suggest, how would your view of reality change? I've been reading Judy's messages since about 1998 and I've seen a change over that length of time. You can go back and read the archives on Usenet and you will see that she used to be quite good at dialoging on discussion groups. But, in the last few years there hs been a steady decrease in her cogent messaging, to the point these days that it' almost total self-defense, often resorting to one-line snarks and then down to the point of creating macros to help her cope. Go figure.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, sharelong60@... wrote:
snip
If I were to do what you suggest, how would your view of reality change?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ubP5zHnlrE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ubP5zHnlrE
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 11:13 PM, awoelflebater@...
awoelflebater@... wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, sharelong60@... wrote:
Judy, what are you hoping to accomplish by bringing this up? What is the
result you want?
Sharon, have you ever been raped or raped? Has your mother, your sister? If
they had been how would you like someone describing the rapists as frisky?
It's that simple.
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:58 PM, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote:
If Judy really thinks so badly of me, then why does she continue to
communicate with me?! It makes no sense and leads me to believe that she has
another motive. Very strange.
Anyway, Steve, how's the skiing? Are the villages looking beautiful?
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:46 PM, steve.sundur@... steve.sundur@...
wrote:
Sure Judy, I wouldn't expect you to interpret it in any other way.
When there is an opportunity to frame something in the worst possible way,
it's pretty much guaranteed that you will be first in line.
Or I should say, those with whom you have a vendetta.
You may not realize it,,but this is a major reason why people stay away from
here.
Of course, I think there are many positive contributions you make, but on
balance, I think it tends to stay pretty ugly.
Maybe those two pictures in the photo section do actually capture two big
facets of your personality.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
Right, the context was Share's preference for punjabis over saris:
Plus they are practical, meaning one could still flee or er apply one's knee
to a feller's nether regions if he got too frisky. So punjabis I'm guessing
are great for setting boundaries if one is about to experience PhysR rather
than PsyR or EmoR. I'm just sayin. (That's a reference, BTW, to her having
accused Robin of psychological rape, another very ugly story involving
Share.) IOW, got too frisky here refers to attempted rape.
Curtis was confused, thinking she was referring to Fairfield. She corrected
him:
Oh, I meant the women in India. From recent news reports there seems to be a
lot of hyper frisky fellers there.
She was referring to an NPR story Buck had linked to about the terrible
problems India was having with rape (including murderous rape--one of the
recent victims was 4 years old).
She later claimed calling the Indian rapists frisky fellers had been a
joke.
I kid you not, folks. This is what Steve is trying to defend her from.
The NPR story is here:
http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment
http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment
I can give you links to any of the posts I quoted.
(I can also refer you to one of the very ugliest posts I've ever seen on FFL.
It's from Curtis, also attempting to defend Share, and it's truly sickening.
Only someone with a disturbed mind could have written it.)
Steve wrote:
Exactly Share. Most everyone knew the context in which you made your comment.
And only those with the most nefarious intent would choose to interpret it in
the way they do.
Why don't you tell us what your interpretation was, Steve? I've given you the
context; go to it.
Quite a shame that people choose to do that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Sure Judy. Thanks for the feedback.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
This doesn't make any sense, Share. If my post was included in another post and you were able to open that one, you wouldn't need to open mine separately. And once again, you didn't answer my question, or any of Ann's. What are you so afraid of? My reply wasn't to you Judy because your post was at the very bottom of the page and I wasn't able to get it to open. Not sure what was going on with that. On Friday, December 27, 2013 8:04 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: I ask, Judy because I've never met anyone like you That's a big ditto. and I'd like to understand better. I've never encountered such grudge holding in my life and again, I'd like to understand better. First thing to do is drop the notion of grudge holding. That's a thought-stopper that is designed to block understanding. I don't often encounter people so stuck in the past as you and the MGC are. And drop the MGC idea. There is no such thing. Use people's names. Next drop the stuck in the past notion, because that isn't true either. Again, my aim is for more understanding. No, it isn't. Your aim is to find a way to protect yourself from understanding while attacking me and preserve what you've already decided is the case, as everything you've said so far in this post proves. This is why I ask what you hope to accomplish. I don't have any hope of getting you to do the right thing. If I were to do what you suggest, how would your view of reality change? I don't believe you are capable of taking responsibility for what you do and say. If you suddenly did, I'd be astonished. I note that you're responding to a post from Ann rather than one from me. But you haven't responded to what she said in her post: Sharon, have you ever been raped or raped? Has your mother, your sister? If they had been how would you like someone describing the rapists as frisky? It's that simple. Finally, did you read the account of the context of your frisky fellers remark I gave to Steve? Do you agree that it's accurate? Here it is again: Right, the context was Share's preference for punjabis over saris: Plus they are practical, meaning one could still flee or er apply one's knee to a feller's nether regions if he got too frisky. So punjabis I'm guessing are great for setting boundaries if one is about to experience PhysR rather than PsyR or EmoR. I'm just sayin. (That's a reference, BTW, to her having accused Robin of psychological rape, another very ugly story involving Share.) IOW, got too frisky here refers to attempted rape. Curtis was confused, thinking she was referring to Fairfield. She corrected him: Oh, I meant the women in India. From recent news reports there seems to be a lot of hyper frisky fellers there. She was referring to an NPR story Buck had linked to about the terrible problems India was having with rape (including murderous rape--one of the recent victims was 4 years old). She later claimed calling the Indian rapists frisky fellers had been a joke. I kid you not, folks. This is what Steve is trying to defend her from. The NPR story is here: http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment I can give you links to any of the posts I quoted.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Judy, I'm not afraid of answering any questions that are asked in a genuine spirit of wanting to increase understanding. This is not the intent I get from this post of yours, even from the very beginning. And I don't get that from your previous post either. I think it is pointless to continue communicating with you. On Friday, December 27, 2013 3:46 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: This doesn't make any sense, Share. If my post was included in another post and you were able to open that one, you wouldn't need to open mine separately. And once again, you didn't answer my question, or any of Ann's. What are you so afraid of? My reply wasn't to you Judy because your post was at the very bottom of the page and I wasn't able to get it to open. Not sure what was going on with that. On Friday, December 27, 2013 8:04 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: I ask, Judy because I've never met anyone like you That's a big ditto. and I'd like to understand better. I've never encountered such grudge holding in my life and again, I'd like to understand better. First thing to do is drop the notion of grudge holding. That's a thought-stopper that is designed to block understanding. I don't often encounter people so stuck in the past as you and the MGC are. And drop the MGC idea. There is no such thing. Use people's names. Next drop the stuck in the past notion, because that isn't true either. Again, my aim is for more understanding. No, it isn't. Your aim is to find a way to protect yourself from understanding while attacking me and preserve what you've already decided is the case, as everything you've said so far in this post proves. This is why I ask what you hope to accomplish. I don't have any hope of getting you to do the right thing. If I were to do what you suggest, how would your view of reality change? I don't believe you are capable of taking responsibility for what you do and say. If you suddenly did, I'd be astonished. I note that you're responding to a post from Ann rather than one from me. But you haven't responded to what she said in her post: Sharon, have you ever been raped or raped? Has your mother, your sister? If they had been how would you like someone describing the rapists as frisky? It's that simple. Finally, did you read the account of the context of your frisky fellers remark I gave to Steve? Do you agree that it's accurate? Here it is again: Right, the context was Share's preference for punjabis over saris: Plus they are practical, meaning one could still flee or er apply one's knee to a feller's nether regions if he got too frisky. So punjabis I'm guessing are great for setting boundaries if one is about to experience PhysR rather than PsyR or EmoR. I'm just sayin. (That's a reference, BTW, to her having accused Robin of psychological rape, another very ugly story involving Share.) IOW, got too frisky here refers to attempted rape. Curtis was confused, thinking she was referring to Fairfield. She corrected him: Oh, I meant the women in India. From recent news reports there seems to be a lot of hyper frisky fellers there. She was referring to an NPR story Buck had linked to about the terrible problems India was having with rape (including murderous rape--one of the recent victims was 4 years old). She later claimed calling the Indian rapists frisky fellers had been a joke. I kid you not, folks. This is what Steve is trying to defend her from. The NPR story is here: http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment I can give you links to any of the posts I quoted.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Jeesus please; one just can't invite any polite company over here without these
people starting in again overwhelming the place with their personal
animosities. Could you folks take your personal grievances with each other
off-list and keep it between yourselves? That would be a large kindness to the
larger FFL group community.
-Buck
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, sharelong60@... wrote:
Judy, I'm not afraid of answering any questions that are asked in a genuine
spirit of wanting to increase understanding. This is not the intent I get from
this post of yours, even from the very beginning. And I don't get that from
your previous post either. I think it is pointless to continue communicating
with you.
On Friday, December 27, 2013 3:46 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
This doesn't make any sense, Share. If my post was included in another post
and you were able to open that one, you wouldn't need to open mine separately.
And once again, you didn't answer my question, or any of Ann's.
What are you so afraid of?
My reply wasn't to you Judy because your post was at the very bottom of the
page and I wasn't able to get it to open. Not sure what was going on with that.
On Friday, December 27, 2013 8:04 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
I ask, Judy because I've never met anyone like you
That's a big ditto.
and I'd like to understand better. I've never encountered such grudge
holding in my life and again, I'd like to understand better.
First thing to do is drop the notion of grudge holding. That's a
thought-stopper that is designed to block understanding.
I don't often encounter people so stuck in the past as you and the MGC are.
And drop the MGC idea. There is no such thing. Use people's names.
Next drop the stuck in the past notion, because that isn't true either.
Again, my aim is for more understanding.
No, it isn't. Your aim is to find a way to protect yourself from understanding
while attacking me and preserve what you've already decided is the case, as
everything you've said so far in this post proves.
This is why I ask what you hope to accomplish.
I don't have any hope of getting you to do the right thing.
If I were to do what you suggest, how would your view of reality change?
I don't believe you are capable of taking responsibility for what you do and
say. If you suddenly did, I'd be astonished.
I note that you're responding to a post from Ann rather than one from me. But
you haven't responded to what she said in her post:
Sharon, have you ever been raped or raped? Has your mother, your sister? If
they had been how would you like someone describing the rapists as frisky?
It's that simple.
Finally, did you read the account of the context of your frisky fellers
remark I gave to Steve? Do you agree that it's accurate? Here it is again:
Right, the context was Share's preference for punjabis over saris:
Plus they are practical, meaning one could still flee or er apply one's knee
to a feller's nether regions if he got too frisky. So punjabis I'm guessing
are great for setting boundaries if one is about to experience PhysR rather
than PsyR or EmoR. I'm just sayin. (That's a reference, BTW, to her having
accused Robin of psychological rape, another very ugly story involving
Share.) IOW, got too frisky here refers to attempted rape.
Curtis was confused, thinking she was referring to Fairfield. She corrected
him:
Oh, I meant the women in India. From recent news reports there seems to be a
lot of hyper frisky fellers there.
She was referring to an NPR story Buck had linked to about the terrible
problems India was having with rape (including murderous rape--one of the
recent victims was 4 years old).
She later claimed calling the Indian rapists frisky fellers had been a
joke.
I kid you not, folks. This is what Steve is trying to defend her from.
The NPR story is here:
http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment
http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment
I can give you links to any of the posts I quoted.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Unless you know another's personal email you cannot do that now Buck. You used to be able to privately send a message to someone unless they specifically forbade it, but the Neo interface as it stands does not allow it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Oh, good excuse, Share. Funny, I didn't get the intent that you were asking me questions in a genuine spirit of wanting to increase understanding, but I wasn't afraid to answer them. Judy, I'm not afraid of answering any questions that are asked in a genuine spirit of wanting to increase understanding. This is not the intent I get from this post of yours, even from the very beginning. And I don't get that from your previous post either. I think it is pointless to continue communicating with you. On Friday, December 27, 2013 3:46 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: This doesn't make any sense, Share. If my post was included in another post and you were able to open that one, you wouldn't need to open mine separately. And once again, you didn't answer my question, or any of Ann's. What are you so afraid of? My reply wasn't to you Judy because your post was at the very bottom of the page and I wasn't able to get it to open. Not sure what was going on with that. On Friday, December 27, 2013 8:04 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: I ask, Judy because I've never met anyone like you That's a big ditto. and I'd like to understand better. I've never encountered such grudge holding in my life and again, I'd like to understand better. First thing to do is drop the notion of grudge holding. That's a thought-stopper that is designed to block understanding. I don't often encounter people so stuck in the past as you and the MGC are. And drop the MGC idea. There is no such thing. Use people's names. Next drop the stuck in the past notion, because that isn't true either. Again, my aim is for more understanding. No, it isn't. Your aim is to find a way to protect yourself from understanding while attacking me and preserve what you've already decided is the case, as everything you've said so far in this post proves. This is why I ask what you hope to accomplish. I don't have any hope of getting you to do the right thing. If I were to do what you suggest, how would your view of reality change? I don't believe you are capable of taking responsibility for what you do and say. If you suddenly did, I'd be astonished. I note that you're responding to a post from Ann rather than one from me. But you haven't responded to what she said in her post: Sharon, have you ever been raped or raped? Has your mother, your sister? If they had been how would you like someone describing the rapists as frisky? It's that simple. Finally, did you read the account of the context of your frisky fellers remark I gave to Steve? Do you agree that it's accurate? Here it is again: Right, the context was Share's preference for punjabis over saris: Plus they are practical, meaning one could still flee or er apply one's knee to a feller's nether regions if he got too frisky. So punjabis I'm guessing are great for setting boundaries if one is about to experience PhysR rather than PsyR or EmoR. I'm just sayin. (That's a reference, BTW, to her having accused Robin of psychological rape, another very ugly story involving Share.) IOW, got too frisky here refers to attempted rape. Curtis was confused, thinking she was referring to Fairfield. She corrected him: Oh, I meant the women in India. From recent news reports there seems to be a lot of hyper frisky fellers there. She was referring to an NPR story Buck had linked to about the terrible problems India was having with rape (including murderous rape--one of the recent victims was 4 years old). She later claimed calling the Indian rapists frisky fellers had been a joke. I kid you not, folks. This is what Steve is trying to defend her from. The NPR story is here: http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment I can give you links to any of the posts I quoted.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
We didn't have any trouble emailing each other, did we, Buck? Unless you know another's personal email you cannot do that now Buck. You used to be able to privately send a message to someone unless they specifically forbade it, but the Neo interface as it stands does not allow it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Creating a phoney macro in NEO is much more than just phoney - it's the sure sign of a poser, desperately seeking attention. Nothing that Ms Stein posts here is to be taken seriously. NOTHING. Even her macro is a pose! Every nerd on the planet knows you can't create a macro in Microsoft Notepad. Go figure. On 12/25/2013 11:03 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Richard shoots himself in both feet: The only one going over the edge here is you, Ms Stein. If creating a phoney macro isn't going over the edge I don't know what is! Nothing I post is to be taken seriously Yup, that'll be my new macro.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Thanks for the link,but why in the world would I need a macro to post a reply to you, or to anyone else? Like Barry, I can already key in text at a very high rate of speed - I've been playing Letter Invaders for twenty years. I will admit using this Toshiba Ultrabook with the chicklet keys slows me down some, but on a Rosewill keyboard, the one with the mechanical clicking sound, I can hit 99 WPM with one hand tied behind my back. Macros are for newbies and nerds who can't type. You'd think that after working as a professional editor out of a home office for close to thirty years, Judy would have learned one simple fact: the querty keyboard does not change - all you have to do is memorize the keyboard layout. It's not complicated. On 12/25/2013 11:22 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: BTW, Richard, if you'd like to start using macros for all your repetitive text, here's the macro program I've been using: http://www.tucows.com/preview/518190/AllKeys-Macro It's free for the first 30 days, then it costs $30 to register it. Installs very easily in Windows, ridiculously simple to use, at least for automating text strings. I haven't tried any of its bells and whistles for doing fancier stuff, but maybe you'll find them helpful too. Richard shoots himself in both feet: The only one going over the edge here is you, Ms Stein. If creating a phoney macro isn't going over the edge I don't know what is! Nothing I post is to be taken seriously Yup, that'll be my new macro.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Because of all the repetition in your posts. You could make a macro of Go figure, for instance, and assign it to a single key. No matter how fast you type, a single key press would be faster. Thanks for the link,but why in the world would I need a macro to post a reply to you, or to anyone else? Like Barry, I can already key in text at a very high rate of speed - I've been playing Letter Invaders for twenty years. I will admit using this Toshiba Ultrabook with the chicklet keys slows me down some, but on a Rosewill keyboard, the one with the mechanical clicking sound, I can hit 99 WPM with one hand tied behind my back. Macros are for newbies and nerds who can't type. You'd think that after working as a professional editor out of a home office for close to thirty years, Judy would have learned one simple fact: the querty keyboard does not change - all you have to do is memorize the keyboard layout. It's not complicated. Does your keyboard have the u key instead of the w key next to the q key? I've used dozens of keyboards in my time, and none of them were querty keyboards. Opsie... guffaw On 12/25/2013 11:22 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: BTW, Richard, if you'd like to start using macros for all your repetitive text, here's the macro program I've been using: http://www.tucows.com/preview/518190/AllKeys-Macro http://www.tucows.com/preview/518190/AllKeys-Macro It's free for the first 30 days, then it costs $30 to register it. Installs very easily in Windows, ridiculously simple to use, at least for automating text strings. I haven't tried any of its bells and whistles for doing fancier stuff, but maybe you'll find them helpful too. Richard shoots himself in both feet: The only one going over the edge here is you, Ms Stein. If creating a phoney macro isn't going over the edge I don't know what is! Nothing I post is to be taken seriously Yup, that'll be my new macro.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
With one nickname, Ricky Retardo, Ann manages to slur mentally challenged
people; Hispanics who still have an accent; and Richard who, imo, contributes a
lot of good too FFL. I've seen twofers here before, but this is the first
threefor I've seen. Wowzie!
On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 9:35 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com
awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
Thanks for taking up the slack, Feste. Good work! Either Robin is a liar or he
has really put a lot over on this forum. Either way, Robin its a parody of Judy
- she can't seem to understand that she is the butt of everyone's joke and has
been for years. If what Robin said was a parody, Judy seemed to miss it, since
she failed to post a single comment about it after Robin left the group. What
Judy doesn't realize is that she is the reason Robin left.
Poor Ricky Retardo. The reason Robin left was because he had much more
important things to do, things that would be far and away beyond your
comprehension or your depth. I have this on the highest authority. Why not
obsess on something else for a while? I know, why don't you and Sharon discuss
what you talk about best - nothing.
On 12/25/2013 11:03 AM, feste37 wrote:
Just one of your innumerable problems, auth, is that you are so obsessed with
attacking other people that you lose all clarity of judgment. You attribute
the worst of motives and intentions to others when such is not the case. It is
quite possible that I have misremembered something I wrote here in the past (I
don't follow your links), but to misremember is not to lie. A lie has to be
deliberate. The person has to know he is telling an untruth. Opinions
expressed may also change over time. That is not lying, either. Your hatred
distorts your ability to use words correctly, so you make false accusations.
There is no need to respond with links that prove what
you are saying, because unlike you I have no interest in
going back to the archives to check on something I may
have said a long time ago. Who cares? Only you. The truth
is that you are a malicious individual who has an
obsessive need to brand people you do not like as liars.
It is a very ugly trait, auth. Of course you are unable to
see it for yourself, but again I ask you: Why do so many
people on this forum despise you? Why are you always
involved in arguments here in which everyone is a liar
except you? The best thing you could do now would be to
apologize for your insulting language toward me, but that
would require a level of decency on your part that you
have never before shown.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
(Gee, Feste, did you maybe wonder whether I might be responding to something
not-so-full of festive cheer and kind words?)
In any case, I'd rather be obsessive than a lying jackass like you and
Richard. (The jackass part is because your lies, and the reasons for your
need to tell them, are so pathetically transparent.)
So here comes The Obsessive on Christmas Day, full of festive cheer and kind
words.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough in the past
couple of days to know you and Feste are lying jackasses. No need to go back
any further than that.
Judy, I don't think anyone is interested in why Robin did or didn't dump
you. If they were, they could go back and re-read all of Robin's messages.
Go figure.
On 12/24/2013 10:38 AM, authfriend@... wrote:
Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was Robin's purported
defection from me to Barry.
At some point you are going to have to face reality, Judy. The first step in
this direction would to stop the fibbing. Then, and only then will you ever
persuade anyone on this forum that you are the only one with integrity.
In withdrawing from FFL
I have had time to
reflect upon my history
there and the characters
I have interacted with.
It will perhaps come as
a shock to some, but in
reading Barry more
closely and without the
intense bias that has
gripped me right from
the start when Barry
appeared to make himself
immune to the effects of
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Ann has some pretty deep-seated prejudices - I tried to advise her of
this, but apparently she is under the Judy spell: combative and nasty
and just plain old mean-spirited. She seemed pretty nice back when Robin
was around - Iwonder if that had any effect on her writing style.
It looks like we are down to just two writers on the forum, Barry and
Richard. Judy, with some help from Ann, got rid of all the other good
writers - Vaj, Curtis, and Robin. Bill has a lot of promise - he
obviously knows a lot, but he is busy earning a living and that's a good
thing. I'm sure he has better things to do than try to give any
knowledge to Judy. Bill knocked her off as a poser a long time ago.
On 12/26/2013 12:03 PM, Share Long wrote:
With one nickname, Ricky Retardo, Ann manages to slur mentally
challenged people; Hispanics who still have an accent; and Richard
who, imo, contributes a lot of good too FFL. I've seen twofers here
before, but this is the first threefor I've seen. Wowzie!
On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 9:35 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com
awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
Thanks for taking up the slack, Feste. Good work! Either Robin is a
liar or he has really put a lot over on this forum. Either way, Robin
its a parody of Judy - she can't seem to understand that she is the
butt of everyone's joke and has been for years. If what Robin said was
a parody, Judy seemed to miss it, since she failed to post a single
comment about it after Robin left the group. What Judy doesn't realize
is that she is the reason Robin left.
Poor Ricky Retardo. The reason Robin left was because he had much more
important things to do, things that would be far and away beyond your
comprehension or your depth. I have this on the highest authority. Why
not obsess on something else for a while? I know, why don't you and
Sharon discuss what you talk about best - nothing.
On 12/25/2013 11:03 AM, feste37 wrote:
Just one of your innumerable problems, auth, is that you are so
obsessed with attacking other people that you lose all clarity of
judgment. You attribute the worst of motives and intentions to others
when such is not the case. It is quite possible that I have
misremembered something I wrote here in the past (I don't follow your
links), but to misremember is not to lie. A lie has to be deliberate.
The person has to know he is telling an untruth. Opinions expressed
may also change over time. That is not lying, either. Your hatred
distorts your ability to use words correctly, so you make false
accusations.
There is no need to respond with links that prove what you are
saying, because unlike you I have no interest in going back to the
archives to check on something I may have said a long time ago. Who
cares? Only you. The truth is that you are a malicious individual who
has an obsessive need to brand people you do not like as liars. It is
a very ugly trait, auth. Of course you are unable to see it for
yourself, but again I ask you: Why do so many people on this forum
despise you? Why are you always involved in arguments here in which
everyone is a liar except you? The best thing you could do now would
be to apologize for your insulting language toward me, but that would
require a level of decency on your part that you have never before
shown.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@...
mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
*(Gee, Feste, did you maybe wonder whether I might be responding to
something not-so-full of festive cheer and kind words?)*
*
*
*In any case, I'd rather be obsessive than a lying jackass like you
and Richard. (The jackass part is because your lies, and the
reasons for your need to tell them, are so pathetically transparent.)*
So here comes The Obsessive on Christmas Day, full of festive cheer
and kind words.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@...
mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
*If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough
in the past couple of days to know you and Feste are lying
jackasses. No need to go back any further than that.*
Judy, I don't think anyone is interested in why Robin did
or didn't dump you. If they were, they could go back and
re-read all of Robin's messages. Go figure.
On 12/24/2013 10:38 AM, authfriend@...
mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was
Robin's purported defection from me to Barry.
At some point you are going to have to face reality,
Judy. The first step in this direction would to stop the
fibbing. Then, and only then will you ever persuade
anyone on this forum that you are the only one with
integrity.
In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon
my history there
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Richard I think Xeno and merudanda are also good writers, in the category of
writers of long and medium sized posts. I think I'm pretty good with the one or
two liners. go figure! (-:
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 12:44 PM, Richard J. Williams
pundits...@gmail.com wrote:
Ann has some pretty deep-seated prejudices - I tried to advise her of this, but
apparently she is under the Judy spell: combative and nasty and just plain old
mean-spirited. She seemed pretty nice back when Robin was around - Iwonder if
that had any effect on her writing style.
It looks like we are down to just two writers on the forum, Barry
and Richard. Judy, with some help from Ann, got rid of all the
other good writers - Vaj, Curtis, and Robin. Bill has a lot of
promise - he obviously knows a lot, but he is busy earning a
living and that's a good thing. I'm sure he has better things to
do than try to give any knowledge to Judy. Bill knocked her off as
a poser a long time ago.
On 12/26/2013 12:03 PM, Share Long wrote:
With one nickname, Ricky Retardo, Ann manages to slur mentally challenged
people; Hispanics who still have an accent; and Richard who, imo, contributes
a lot of good too FFL. I've seen twofers here before, but this is the first
threefor I've seen. Wowzie!
On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 9:35 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com
awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
Thanks for taking up the slack, Feste. Good work! Either Robin is a liar or he
has really put a lot over on this forum. Either way, Robin its a parody of
Judy - she can't seem to understand that she is the butt of everyone's joke
and has been for years. If what Robin said was a parody, Judy seemed to miss
it, since she failed to post a single comment about it after Robin left the
group. What Judy doesn't realize is that she is the reason Robin left.
Poor Ricky Retardo. The reason Robin left was because he had much more
important things to do, things that would be far and away beyond your
comprehension or your depth. I have this on the highest authority. Why not
obsess on something else for a while? I know, why don't you and Sharon discuss
what you talk about best - nothing.
On 12/25/2013 11:03 AM, feste37 wrote:
Just one of your innumerable problems, auth, is that you are so obsessed with
attacking other people that you lose all clarity of judgment. You attribute
the worst of motives and intentions to others when such is not the case. It
is quite possible that I have misremembered something I wrote here in the
past (I don't follow your links), but to misremember is not to lie. A lie has
to be deliberate. The person has to know he is telling an untruth. Opinions
expressed may also change over time. That is not lying, either. Your hatred
distorts your ability to use words correctly, so you make false accusations.
There is no need to respond
with links that prove what
you are saying, because unlike
you I have no interest in
going back to the archives to
check on something I may have
said a long time ago. Who
cares? Only you. The truth is
that you are a malicious
individual who has an
obsessive need to brand people
you do not like as liars. It
is a very ugly trait, auth. Of
course you are unable to see
it for yourself, but again I
ask you: Why do so many people
on this forum despise you? Why
are you always involved in
arguments here in which
everyone is a liar except you?
The best thing you could do
now would be to apologize for
your insulting language toward
me, but that would require a
level of decency on your part
that you have never before
shown.
---In
FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}},
authfriend@... wrote:
(Gee, Feste, did you maybe wonder whether I might be responding to something
not-so-full of
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be taken seriously. Ann has some pretty deep-seated prejudices - I tried to advise her of this, but apparently she is under the Judy spell: combative and nasty and just plain old mean-spirited. She seemed pretty nice back when Robin was around - Iwonder if that had any effect on her writing style. It looks like we are down to just two writers on the forum, Barry and Richard. Judy, with some help from Ann, got rid of all the other good writers - Vaj, Curtis, and Robin. Bill has a lot of promise - he obviously knows a lot, but he is busy earning a living and that's a good thing. I'm sure he has better things to do than try to give any knowledge to Judy. Bill knocked her off as a poser a long time ago.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
I seem to recall your referring to would-be Indian rapists as frisky. IMHO, that's about a ten-fer, all in one unbelievably insensitive remark. But keep going, Share. I'm sure you're impressing Uncle Feste with your .great integrity. With one nickname, Ricky Retardo, Ann manages to slur mentally challenged people; Hispanics who still have an accent; and Richard who, imo, contributes a lot of good too FFL. I've seen twofers here before, but this is the first threefor I've seen. Wowzie!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Judy, this is how you don't face reality, the reality that Ann made a triple slur. You dig up something that I said months ago. This is also what I mean by your double standards. On Thursday, December 26, 2013 2:05 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: I seem to recall your referring to would-be Indian rapists as frisky. IMHO, that's about a ten-fer, all in one unbelievably insensitive remark. But keep going, Share. I'm sure you're impressing Uncle Feste with your .great integrity. With one nickname, Ricky Retardo, Ann manages to slur mentally challenged people; Hispanics who still have an accent; and Richard who, imo, contributes a lot of good too FFL. I've seen twofers here before, but this is the first threefor I've seen. Wowzie!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
The point is that it's a huge stretch to claim Ann intended slurs on mentally challenged people or Hispanics with accents. (And slurs on Richard are eminently well deserved; he's made many more and far worse slurs on Ann and me.) Your trivializing comment about would-be rapists, in contrast, was horrendously insensitive women no matter how you look at it. There isn't much in the way of contrary opinion among civilized people that rape is a terrible crime. The offenses must be equivalent for a double standard about them to exist. That wasn't the case here: Ann's was minuscule and contrived by you; yours was major. It's hypocritical, IOW, for you to whine about what Ann said when you've been guilty of much worse. Judy, this is how you don't face reality, the reality that Ann made a triple slur. You dig up something that I said months ago. This is also what I mean by your double standards. On Thursday, December 26, 2013 2:05 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: I seem to recall your referring to would-be Indian rapists as frisky. IMHO, that's about a ten-fer, all in one unbelievably insensitive remark. But keep going, Share. I'm sure you're impressing Uncle Feste with your .great integrity. With one nickname, Ricky Retardo, Ann manages to slur mentally challenged people; Hispanics who still have an accent; and Richard who, imo, contributes a lot of good too FFL. I've seen twofers here before, but this is the first threefor I've seen. Wowzie!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Judy, I think there have been many huge stretches on the part of you and your buddies to give nefarious interpretations to what I've written. On Thursday, December 26, 2013 2:38 PM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com wrote: Judy, this is how you don't face reality, the reality that Ann made a triple slur. You dig up something that I said months ago. This is also what I mean by your double standards. On Thursday, December 26, 2013 2:05 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: I seem to recall your referring to would-be Indian rapists as frisky. IMHO, that's about a ten-fer, all in one unbelievably insensitive remark. But keep going, Share. I'm sure you're impressing Uncle Feste with your .great integrity. With one nickname, Ricky Retardo, Ann manages to slur mentally challenged people; Hispanics who still have an accent; and Richard who, imo, contributes a lot of good too FFL. I've seen twofers here before, but this is the first threefor I've seen. Wowzie!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Of course you think that, Share. You have to think that. I understand. It's a survival measure. Judy, I think there have been many huge stretches on the part of you and your buddies to give nefarious interpretations to what I've written. On Thursday, December 26, 2013 2:38 PM, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: Judy, this is how you don't face reality, the reality that Ann made a triple slur. You dig up something that I said months ago. This is also what I mean by your double standards. On Thursday, December 26, 2013 2:05 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: I seem to recall your referring to would-be Indian rapists as frisky. IMHO, that's about a ten-fer, all in one unbelievably insensitive remark. But keep going, Share. I'm sure you're impressing Uncle Feste with your .great integrity. With one nickname, Ricky Retardo, Ann manages to slur mentally challenged people; Hispanics who still have an accent; and Richard who, imo, contributes a lot of good too FFL. I've seen twofers here before, but this is the first threefor I've seen. Wowzie!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
On 12/26/2013 11:09 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Does your keyboard have the u key instead of the w key next to the q key? I've used dozens of keyboards in my time, and none of them were querty keyboards. Opsie... Oh my Gawd! The Corrector caught me making a typo. This is really a serious offense. Who said Judy doesn't mix up her professional work with her personal work? QWERTY. Is that better?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, sharelong60@... wrote:
Judy, this is how you don't face reality, the reality that Ann made a triple
slur. You dig up something that I said months ago. This is also what I mean by
your double standards.
I did no such thing, I was speaking very clearly.
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 2:05 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@...
wrote:
I seem to recall your referring to would-be Indian rapists as frisky.
IMHO, that's about a ten-fer, all in one unbelievably insensitive remark.
But keep going, Share. I'm sure you're impressing Uncle Feste with your .great
integrity.
With one nickname, Ricky Retardo, Ann manages to slur mentally challenged
people; Hispanics who still have an accent; and Richard who, imo, contributes a
lot of good too FFL. I've seen twofers here before, but this is the first
threefor I've seen. Wowzie!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
On 12/26/2013 11:09 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
Does your keyboard have the u key instead of the w key next to the q
key? I've used dozens of keyboards in my time, and none of them were querty
keyboards.
Opsie...
Oh my Gawd! The Corrector caught me making a typo. This is really a serious
offense. Who said Judy doesn't mix up her professional work with her personal
work? QWERTY. Is that better?
There's another one. Or, if you only have a gawd in your life that could
explain everything - or nearly.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Much better. It was just really funny that you made that particular typo while blustering about how the standard keyboard never changes. Does your keyboard have the u key instead of the w key next to the q key? I've used dozens of keyboards in my time, and none of them were querty keyboards. Opsie... Oh my Gawd! The Corrector caught me making a typo. This is really a serious offense. Who said Judy doesn't mix up her professional work with her personal work? QWERTY. Is that better?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
You think this Judy because all of your strategies are your survival measures! Good job! On Thursday, December 26, 2013 3:41 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Of course you think that, Share. You have to think that. I understand. It's a survival measure. Judy, I think there have been many huge stretches on the part of you and your buddies to give nefarious interpretations to what I've written. On Thursday, December 26, 2013 2:38 PM, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: Judy, this is how you don't face reality, the reality that Ann made a triple slur. You dig up something that I said months ago. This is also what I mean by your double standards. On Thursday, December 26, 2013 2:05 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: I seem to recall your referring to would-be Indian rapists as frisky. IMHO, that's about a ten-fer, all in one unbelievably insensitive remark. But keep going, Share. I'm sure you're impressing Uncle Feste with your .great integrity. With one nickname, Ricky Retardo, Ann manages to slur mentally challenged people; Hispanics who still have an accent; and Richard who, imo, contributes a lot of good too FFL. I've seen twofers here before, but this is the first threefor I've seen. Wowzie!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Pretty weak, Share. Can't you do any better than this? You think this Judy because all of your strategies are your survival measures! Good job! Of course you think that, Share. You have to think that. I understand. It's a survival measure. Judy, I think there have been many huge stretches on the part of you and your buddies to give nefarious interpretations to what I've written. On Thursday, December 26, 2013 2:38 PM, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: Judy, this is how you don't face reality, the reality that Ann made a triple slur. You dig up something that I said months ago. This is also what I mean by your double standards. On Thursday, December 26, 2013 2:05 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: I seem to recall your referring to would-be Indian rapists as frisky. IMHO, that's about a ten-fer, all in one unbelievably insensitive remark. But keep going, Share. I'm sure you're impressing Uncle Feste with your .great integrity. With one nickname, Ricky Retardo, Ann manages to slur mentally challenged people; Hispanics who still have an accent; and Richard who, imo, contributes a lot of good too FFL. I've seen twofers here before, but this is the first threefor I've seen. Wowzie!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Judy, I didn't realize it was a contest. Go figure! On Thursday, December 26, 2013 4:06 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Pretty weak, Share. Can't you do any better than this? You think this Judy because all of your strategies are your survival measures! Good job! Of course you think that, Share. You have to think that. I understand. It's a survival measure. Judy, I think there have been many huge stretches on the part of you and your buddies to give nefarious interpretations to what I've written. On Thursday, December 26, 2013 2:38 PM, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: Judy, this is how you don't face reality, the reality that Ann made a triple slur. You dig up something that I said months ago. This is also what I mean by your double standards. On Thursday, December 26, 2013 2:05 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: I seem to recall your referring to would-be Indian rapists as frisky. IMHO, that's about a ten-fer, all in one unbelievably insensitive remark. But keep going, Share. I'm sure you're impressing Uncle Feste with your .great integrity. With one nickname, Ricky Retardo, Ann manages to slur mentally challenged people; Hispanics who still have an accent; and Richard who, imo, contributes a lot of good too FFL. I've seen twofers here before, but this is the first threefor I've seen. Wowzie!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Even weaker. Of course you didn't realize it. After all, if it were a contest, you might lose. Judy, I didn't realize it was a contest. Go figure! On Thursday, December 26, 2013 4:06 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: Pretty weak, Share. Can't you do any better than this? You think this Judy because all of your strategies are your survival measures! Good job! Of course you think that, Share. You have to think that. I understand. It's a survival measure. Judy, I think there have been many huge stretches on the part of you and your buddies to give nefarious interpretations to what I've written. On Thursday, December 26, 2013 2:38 PM, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: Judy, this is how you don't face reality, the reality that Ann made a triple slur. You dig up something that I said months ago. This is also what I mean by your double standards. On Thursday, December 26, 2013 2:05 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: I seem to recall your referring to would-be Indian rapists as frisky. IMHO, that's about a ten-fer, all in one unbelievably insensitive remark. But keep going, Share. I'm sure you're impressing Uncle Feste with your .great integrity. With one nickname, Ricky Retardo, Ann manages to slur mentally challenged people; Hispanics who still have an accent; and Richard who, imo, contributes a lot of good too FFL. I've seen twofers here before, but this is the first threefor I've seen. Wowzie!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Exactly Share. Most everyone knew the context in which you made your comment. And only those with the most nefarious intent would choose to interpret it in the way they do. Quite a shame that people choose to do that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Right, the context was Share's preference for punjabis over saris: Plus they are practical, meaning one could still flee or er apply one's knee to a feller's nether regions if he got too frisky. So punjabis I'm guessing are great for setting boundaries if one is about to experience PhysR rather than PsyR or EmoR. I'm just sayin. (That's a reference, BTW, to her having accused Robin of psychological rape, another very ugly story involving Share.) IOW, got too frisky here refers to attempted rape. Curtis was confused, thinking she was referring to Fairfield. She corrected him: Oh, I meant the women in India. From recent news reports there seems to be a lot of hyper frisky fellers there. She was referring to an NPR story Buck had linked to about the terrible problems India was having with rape (including murderous rape--one of the recent victims was 4 years old). She later claimed calling the Indian rapists frisky fellers had been a joke. I kid you not, folks. This is what Steve is trying to defend her from. The NPR story is here: http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment I can give you links to any of the posts I quoted. (I can also refer you to one of the very ugliest posts I've ever seen on FFL. It's from Curtis, also attempting to defend Share, and it's truly sickening. Only someone with a disturbed mind could have written it.) Steve wrote: Exactly Share. Most everyone knew the context in which you made your comment. And only those with the most nefarious intent would choose to interpret it in the way they do. Why don't you tell us what your interpretation was, Steve? I've given you the context; go to it. Quite a shame that people choose to do that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Sure Judy, I wouldn't expect you to interpret it in any other way.
When there is an opportunity to frame something in the worst possible way,
it's pretty much guaranteed that you will be first in line.
Or I should say, those with whom you have a vendetta.
You may not realize it,,but this is a major reason why people stay away from
here.
Of course, I think there are many positive contributions you make, but on
balance, I think it tends to stay pretty ugly.
Maybe those two pictures in the photo section do actually capture two big
facets of your personality.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
Right, the context was Share's preference for punjabis over saris:
Plus they are practical, meaning one could still flee or er apply one's knee
to a feller's nether regions if he got too frisky. So punjabis I'm guessing
are great for setting boundaries if one is about to experience PhysR rather
than PsyR or EmoR. I'm just sayin. (That's a reference, BTW, to her having
accused Robin of psychological rape, another very ugly story involving
Share.) IOW, got too frisky here refers to attempted rape.
Curtis was confused, thinking she was referring to Fairfield. She corrected
him:
Oh, I meant the women in India. From recent news reports there seems to be a
lot of hyper frisky fellers there.
She was referring to an NPR story Buck had linked to about the terrible
problems India was having with rape (including murderous rape--one of the
recent victims was 4 years old).
She later claimed calling the Indian rapists frisky fellers had been a
joke.
I kid you not, folks. This is what Steve is trying to defend her from.
The NPR story is here:
http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment
http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment
I can give you links to any of the posts I quoted.
(I can also refer you to one of the very ugliest posts I've ever seen on FFL.
It's from Curtis, also attempting to defend Share, and it's truly sickening.
Only someone with a disturbed mind could have written it.)
Steve wrote:
Exactly Share. Most everyone knew the context in which you made your comment.
And only those with the most nefarious intent would choose to interpret it in
the way they do.
Why don't you tell us what your interpretation was, Steve? I've given you the
context; go to it.
Quite a shame that people choose to do that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
If Judy really thinks so badly of me, then why does she continue to communicate
with me?! It makes no sense and leads me to believe that she has another
motive. Very strange.
Anyway, Steve, how's the skiing? Are the villages looking beautiful?
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:46 PM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com
steve.sun...@yahoo.com wrote:
Sure Judy, I wouldn't expect you to interpret it in any other way.
When there is an opportunity to frame something in the worst possible way, it's
pretty much guaranteed that you will be first in line.
Or I should say, those with whom you have a vendetta.
You may not realize it,,but this is a major reason why people stay away from
here.
Of course, I think there are many positive contributions you make, but on
balance, I think it tends to stay pretty ugly.
Maybe those two pictures in the photo section do actually capture two big
facets of your personality.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
Right, the context was Share's preference for punjabis over saris:
Plus they are practical, meaning one could still flee or er apply one's knee
to a feller's nether regions if he got too frisky. So punjabis I'm guessing
are great for setting boundaries if one is about to experience PhysR rather
than PsyR or EmoR. I'm just sayin. (That's a reference, BTW, to her having
accused Robin of psychological rape, another very ugly story involving
Share.) IOW, got too frisky here refers to attempted rape.
Curtis was confused, thinking she was referring to Fairfield. She corrected him:
Oh, I meant the women in India. From recent news reports there seems to be a
lot of hyper frisky fellers there.
She was referring to an NPR story Buck had linked to about the terrible
problems India was having with rape (including murderous rape--one of the
recent victims was 4 years old).
She later claimed calling the Indian rapists frisky fellers had been a joke.
I kid you not, folks. This is what Steve is trying to defend her from.
The NPR story is here:
http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment
I can give you links to any of the posts I quoted.
(I can also refer you to one of the very ugliest posts I've ever seen on FFL.
It's from Curtis, also attempting to defend Share, and it's truly sickening.
Only someone with a disturbed mind could have written it.)
Steve wrote:
Exactly Share. Most everyone knew the context in which you made your comment.
And only those with the most nefarious intent would choose to interpret it in
the way they do.
Why don't you tell us what your interpretation was, Steve? I've given you the
context; go to it.
Quite a shame that people choose to do that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Judy, what are you hoping to accomplish by bringing this up? What is the result
you want?
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:58 PM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com
wrote:
If Judy really thinks so badly of me, then why does she continue to communicate
with me?! It makes no sense and leads me to believe that she has another
motive. Very strange.
Anyway, Steve, how's the skiing? Are the villages looking beautiful?
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:46 PM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com
steve.sun...@yahoo.com wrote:
Sure Judy, I wouldn't expect you to interpret it in any other way.
When there is an opportunity to frame something in the worst possible way, it's
pretty much guaranteed that you will be first in line.
Or I should say, those with whom you have a vendetta.
You may not realize it,,but this is a major reason why people stay away from
here.
Of course, I think there are many positive contributions you make, but on
balance, I think it tends to stay pretty ugly.
Maybe those two pictures in the photo section do actually capture two big
facets of your personality.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
Right, the context was Share's preference for punjabis over saris:
Plus they are practical, meaning one could still flee or er apply one's knee
to a feller's nether regions if he got too frisky. So punjabis I'm guessing
are great for setting boundaries if one is about to experience PhysR rather
than PsyR or EmoR. I'm just sayin. (That's a reference, BTW, to her having
accused Robin of psychological rape, another very ugly story involving
Share.) IOW, got too frisky here refers to attempted rape.
Curtis was confused, thinking she was referring to Fairfield. She corrected him:
Oh, I meant the women in India. From recent news reports there seems to be a
lot of hyper frisky fellers there.
She was referring to an NPR story Buck had linked to about the terrible
problems India was having with rape (including murderous rape--one of the
recent victims was 4 years old).
She later claimed calling the Indian rapists frisky fellers had been a joke.
I kid you not, folks. This is what Steve is trying to defend her from.
The NPR story is here:
http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment
I can give you links to any of the posts I quoted.
(I can also refer you to one of the very ugliest posts I've ever seen on FFL.
It's from Curtis, also attempting to defend Share, and it's truly sickening.
Only someone with a disturbed mind could have written it.)
Steve wrote:
Exactly Share. Most everyone knew the context in which you made your comment.
And only those with the most nefarious intent would choose to interpret it in
the way they do.
Why don't you tell us what your interpretation was, Steve? I've given you the
context; go to it.
Quite a shame that people choose to do that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, sharelong60@... wrote:
If Judy really thinks so badly of me, then why does she continue to
communicate with me?! It makes no sense and leads me to believe that she has
another motive. Very strange.
I'll tell you what's strange and that's your segue into this next paragraph.
Can anyone say psychotic'?
Anyway, Steve, how's the skiing? Are the villages looking beautiful?
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:46 PM, steve.sundur@... steve.sundur@...
wrote:
Sure Judy, I wouldn't expect you to interpret it in any other way.
When there is an opportunity to frame something in the worst possible way,
it's pretty much guaranteed that you will be first in line.
Or I should say, those with whom you have a vendetta.
You may not realize it,,but this is a major reason why people stay away from
here.
Of course, I think there are many positive contributions you make, but on
balance, I think it tends to stay pretty ugly.
Maybe those two pictures in the photo section do actually capture two big
facets of your personality.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
Right, the context was Share's preference for punjabis over saris:
Plus they are practical, meaning one could still flee or er apply one's knee
to a feller's nether regions if he got too frisky. So punjabis I'm guessing
are great for setting boundaries if one is about to experience PhysR rather
than PsyR or EmoR. I'm just sayin. (That's a reference, BTW, to her having
accused Robin of psychological rape, another very ugly story involving
Share.) IOW, got too frisky here refers to attempted rape.
Curtis was confused, thinking she was referring to Fairfield. She corrected
him:
Oh, I meant the women in India. From recent news reports there seems to be a
lot of hyper frisky fellers there.
She was referring to an NPR story Buck had linked to about the terrible
problems India was having with rape (including murderous rape--one of the
recent victims was 4 years old).
She later claimed calling the Indian rapists frisky fellers had been a
joke.
I kid you not, folks. This is what Steve is trying to defend her from.
The NPR story is here:
http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment
http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment
I can give you links to any of the posts I quoted.
(I can also refer you to one of the very ugliest posts I've ever seen on FFL.
It's from Curtis, also attempting to defend Share, and it's truly sickening.
Only someone with a disturbed mind could have written it.)
Steve wrote:
Exactly Share. Most everyone knew the context in which you made your comment.
And only those with the most nefarious intent would choose to interpret it in
the way they do.
Why don't you tell us what your interpretation was, Steve? I've given you the
context; go to it.
Quite a shame that people choose to do that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, sharelong60@... wrote:
Judy, what are you hoping to accomplish by bringing this up? What is the
result you want?
Sharon, have you ever been raped or raped? Has your mother, your sister? If
they had been how would you like someone describing the rapists as frisky?
It's that simple.
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:58 PM, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote:
If Judy really thinks so badly of me, then why does she continue to
communicate with me?! It makes no sense and leads me to believe that she has
another motive. Very strange.
Anyway, Steve, how's the skiing? Are the villages looking beautiful?
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:46 PM, steve.sundur@... steve.sundur@...
wrote:
Sure Judy, I wouldn't expect you to interpret it in any other way.
When there is an opportunity to frame something in the worst possible way,
it's pretty much guaranteed that you will be first in line.
Or I should say, those with whom you have a vendetta.
You may not realize it,,but this is a major reason why people stay away from
here.
Of course, I think there are many positive contributions you make, but on
balance, I think it tends to stay pretty ugly.
Maybe those two pictures in the photo section do actually capture two big
facets of your personality.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
Right, the context was Share's preference for punjabis over saris:
Plus they are practical, meaning one could still flee or er apply one's knee
to a feller's nether regions if he got too frisky. So punjabis I'm guessing
are great for setting boundaries if one is about to experience PhysR rather
than PsyR or EmoR. I'm just sayin. (That's a reference, BTW, to her having
accused Robin of psychological rape, another very ugly story involving
Share.) IOW, got too frisky here refers to attempted rape.
Curtis was confused, thinking she was referring to Fairfield. She corrected
him:
Oh, I meant the women in India. From recent news reports there seems to be a
lot of hyper frisky fellers there.
She was referring to an NPR story Buck had linked to about the terrible
problems India was having with rape (including murderous rape--one of the
recent victims was 4 years old).
She later claimed calling the Indian rapists frisky fellers had been a
joke.
I kid you not, folks. This is what Steve is trying to defend her from.
The NPR story is here:
http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment
http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment
I can give you links to any of the posts I quoted.
(I can also refer you to one of the very ugliest posts I've ever seen on FFL.
It's from Curtis, also attempting to defend Share, and it's truly sickening.
Only someone with a disturbed mind could have written it.)
Steve wrote:
Exactly Share. Most everyone knew the context in which you made your comment.
And only those with the most nefarious intent would choose to interpret it in
the way they do.
Why don't you tell us what your interpretation was, Steve? I've given you the
context; go to it.
Quite a shame that people choose to do that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
And your interpretation is...? (Didn't you see my question?)
Sure Judy, I wouldn't expect you to interpret it in any other way.
When there is an opportunity to frame something in the worst possible way,
it's pretty much guaranteed that you will be first in line.
Or I should say, those with whom you have a vendetta.
You may not realize it,,but this is a major reason why people stay away from
here.
Of course, I think there are many positive contributions you make, but on
balance, I think it tends to stay pretty ugly.
Maybe those two pictures in the photo section do actually capture two big
facets of your personality.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
Right, the context was Share's preference for punjabis over saris:
Plus they are practical, meaning one could still flee or er apply one's knee
to a feller's nether regions if he got too frisky. So punjabis I'm guessing
are great for setting boundaries if one is about to experience PhysR rather
than PsyR or EmoR. I'm just sayin. (That's a reference, BTW, to her having
accused Robin of psychological rape, another very ugly story involving
Share.) IOW, got too frisky here refers to attempted rape.
Curtis was confused, thinking she was referring to Fairfield. She corrected
him:
Oh, I meant the women in India. From recent news reports there seems to be a
lot of hyper frisky fellers there.
She was referring to an NPR story Buck had linked to about the terrible
problems India was having with rape (including murderous rape--one of the
recent victims was 4 years old).
She later claimed calling the Indian rapists frisky fellers had been a
joke.
I kid you not, folks. This is what Steve is trying to defend her from.
The NPR story is here:
http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment
http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment
I can give you links to any of the posts I quoted.
(I can also refer you to one of the very ugliest posts I've ever seen on FFL.
It's from Curtis, also attempting to defend Share, and it's truly sickening.
Only someone with a disturbed mind could have written it.)
Steve wrote:
Exactly Share. Most everyone knew the context in which you made your comment.
And only those with the most nefarious intent would choose to interpret it in
the way they do.
Why don't you tell us what your interpretation was, Steve? I've given you the
context; go to it.
Quite a shame that people choose to do that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
It's pretty strange that you would have to ask, Share. But since you seem
confused:
The best possible outcome would be for you to take responsibility for having
said something incredibly insensitive and then apologize to the rest of us for
having tried to wiggle out of it before. You could also tell your knee-jerk
defenders like Steve that they're wrong to try to exonerate you, especially by
vilifying others for their purportedly nefarious understanding of what you
actually said.
I have virtually no hope of that ever happening, but boy, if it did it would
sure change my notions of how reality works.
Judy, what are you hoping to accomplish by bringing this up? What is the
result you want?
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:58 PM, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote:
If Judy really thinks so badly of me, then why does she continue to
communicate with me?! It makes no sense and leads me to believe that she has
another motive. Very strange.
Anyway, Steve, how's the skiing? Are the villages looking beautiful?
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:46 PM, steve.sundur@... steve.sundur@...
wrote:
Sure Judy, I wouldn't expect you to interpret it in any other way.
When there is an opportunity to frame something in the worst possible way,
it's pretty much guaranteed that you will be first in line.
Or I should say, those with whom you have a vendetta.
You may not realize it,,but this is a major reason why people stay away from
here.
Of course, I think there are many positive contributions you make, but on
balance, I think it tends to stay pretty ugly.
Maybe those two pictures in the photo section do actually capture two big
facets of your personality.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
Right, the context was Share's preference for punjabis over saris:
Plus they are practical, meaning one could still flee or er apply one's knee
to a feller's nether regions if he got too frisky. So punjabis I'm guessing
are great for setting boundaries if one is about to experience PhysR rather
than PsyR or EmoR. I'm just sayin. (That's a reference, BTW, to her having
accused Robin of psychological rape, another very ugly story involving
Share.) IOW, got too frisky here refers to attempted rape.
Curtis was confused, thinking she was referring to Fairfield. She corrected
him:
Oh, I meant the women in India. From recent news reports there seems to be a
lot of hyper frisky fellers there.
She was referring to an NPR story Buck had linked to about the terrible
problems India was having with rape (including murderous rape--one of the
recent victims was 4 years old).
She later claimed calling the Indian rapists frisky fellers had been a
joke.
I kid you not, folks. This is what Steve is trying to defend her from.
The NPR story is here:
http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment
http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment
I can give you links to any of the posts I quoted.
(I can also refer you to one of the very ugliest posts I've ever seen on FFL.
It's from Curtis, also attempting to defend Share, and it's truly sickening.
Only someone with a disturbed mind could have written it.)
Steve wrote:
Exactly Share. Most everyone knew the context in which you made your comment.
And only those with the most nefarious intent would choose to interpret it in
the way they do.
Why don't you tell us what your interpretation was, Steve? I've given you the
context; go to it.
Quite a shame that people choose to do that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Judy, I don't think anyone is interested in why Robin did or didn't dump you. If they were, they could go back and re-read all of Robin's messages. Go figure. On 12/24/2013 10:38 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was Robin's purported defection from me to Barry. At some point you are going to have to face reality, Judy. The first step in this direction would to stop the fibbing. Then, and only then will you ever persuade anyone on this forum that you are the only one with integrity. In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and the characters I have interacted with. It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about even myself... http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 Do you suppose Richard is so far gone he didn't notice that what he quoted from Robin's post confirmed what I had just said that he called a fib? Poor fellow.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough in the past couple of days to know you and Feste are lying jackasses. No need to go back any further than that. Judy, I don't think anyone is interested in why Robin did or didn't dump you. If they were, they could go back and re-read all of Robin's messages. Go figure. On 12/24/2013 10:38 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was Robin's purported defection from me to Barry. At some point you are going to have to face reality, Judy. The first step in this direction would to stop the fibbing. Then, and only then will you ever persuade anyone on this forum that you are the only one with integrity. In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and the characters I have interacted with. It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about even myself... http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 Do you suppose Richard is so far gone he didn't notice that what he quoted from Robin's post confirmed what I had just said that he called a fib? Poor fellow.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
On 12/25/2013 9:25 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough in the past couple of days to know you and Feste are lying jackasses. No need to go back any further than that.* Just in case they are still interested there's this from the same post of Robin's, which if untrue, constitutes one of the biggest fibs ever posted to the group, and your non-reply if WAS a fib. You are usually pretty quick to make a comment on anyone posting outright lies to the group. But, in this case it looks like Robin was sincere. Either way, you are hoisted on your own petard this time. LoL! *Judy, I think you an intelligent and well-meaning person; but Curtis and Barry?and even to some extent, although less passionately, Steve?have identified what is wrong with you; and I think you must be courageous enough to finally examine yourself, since I, who until just now was one of your most loyal supporters have undergone an extraordinary change of heart, and have admitted to myself that you are the person in the wrong here, that Barry is right. Would you even just for the sake of how much I have defended you in the past, think about what I have said here? http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960* Judy, I don't think anyone is interested in why Robin did or didn't dump you. If they were, they could go back and re-read all of Robin's messages. Go figure. On 12/24/2013 10:38 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was Robin's purported defection from me to Barry. At some point you are going to have to face reality, Judy. The first step in this direction would to stop the fibbing. Then, and only then will you ever persuade anyone on this forum that you are the only one with integrity. In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and the characters I have interacted with. It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about even myself... http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 Do you suppose Richard is so far gone he didn't notice that what he quoted from Robin's post confirmed what I had just said that he called a fib? Poor fellow.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parody http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parody If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough in the past couple of days to know you and Feste are lying jackasses. No need to go back any further than that. Just in case they are still interested there's this from the same post of Robin's, which if untrue, constitutes one of the biggest fibs ever posted to the group, and your non-reply if WAS a fib. You are usually pretty quick to make a comment on anyone posting outright lies to the group. But, in this case it looks like Robin was sincere. Either way, you are hoisted on your own petard this time. LoL! Judy, I think you an intelligent and well-meaning person; but Curtis and Barry?and even to some extent, although less passionately, Steve?have identified what is wrong with you; and I think you must be courageous enough to finally examine yourself, since I, who until just now was one of your most loyal supporters have undergone an extraordinary change of heart, and have admitted to myself that you are the person in the wrong here, that Barry is right. Would you even just for the sake of how much I have defended you in the past, think about what I have said here? http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 Judy, I don't think anyone is interested in why Robin did or didn't dump you. If they were, they could go back and re-read all of Robin's messages. Go figure. On 12/24/2013 10:38 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was Robin's purported defection from me to Barry. At some point you are going to have to face reality, Judy. The first step in this direction would to stop the fibbing. Then, and only then will you ever persuade anyone on this forum that you are the only one with integrity. In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and the characters I have interacted with. It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about even myself... http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 Do you suppose Richard is so far gone he didn't notice that what he quoted from Robin's post confirmed what I had just said that he called a fib? Poor fellow.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
So here comes The Obsessive on Christmas Day, full of festive cheer and kind
words.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough in the past
couple of days to know you and Feste are lying jackasses. No need to go back
any further than that.
Judy, I don't think anyone is interested in why Robin did or didn't dump
you. If they were, they could go back and re-read all of Robin's messages. Go
figure.
On 12/24/2013 10:38 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was Robin's purported
defection from me to Barry. At some point you are going to have to face
reality, Judy. The first step in this direction would to stop the fibbing.
Then, and only then will you ever persuade anyone on this forum that you are
the only one with integrity.
In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and
the characters I have interacted with.
It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and
without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry
appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded
that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about
even myself...
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960
Do you suppose Richard is so far gone he didn't notice that what he quoted
from Robin's post confirmed what I had just said that he called a fib?
Poor fellow.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
So, when a Canadian posts fibs, he is posting a parody; when two guys from Texas post fibs, they are liars. Thanks for pointing that out - that might help explain why you seem so prejudiced against Texans. Go figure. On 12/25/2013 10:03 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parody *If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough in the past couple of days to know you and Feste are lying jackasses. No need to go back any further than that.* Just in case they are still interested there's this from the same post of Robin's, which if untrue, constitutes one of the biggest fibs ever posted to the group, and your non-reply if WAS a fib. You are usually pretty quick to make a comment on anyone posting outright lies to the group. But, in this case it looks like Robin was sincere. Either way, you are hoisted on your own petard this time. LoL! *Judy, I think you an intelligent and well-meaning person; but Curtis and Barry?and even to some extent, although less passionately, Steve?have identified what is wrong with you; and I think you must be courageous enough to finally examine yourself, since I, who until just now was one of your most loyal supporters have undergone an extraordinary change of heart, and have admitted to myself that you are the person in the wrong here, that Barry is right. Would you even just for the sake of how much I have defended you in the past, think about what I have said here? http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960* Judy, I don't think anyone is interested in why Robin did or didn't dump you. If they were, they could go back and re-read all of Robin's messages. Go figure. On 12/24/2013 10:38 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was Robin's purported defection from me to Barry. At some point you are going to have to face reality, Judy. The first step in this direction would to stop the fibbing. Then, and only then will you ever persuade anyone on this forum that you are the only one with integrity. In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and the characters I have interacted with. It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about even myself... http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 Do you suppose Richard is so far gone he didn't notice that what he quoted from Robin's post confirmed what I had just said that he called a fib? Poor fellow.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
I am not expecting Barry to exonerate me from my past dealings with
him; I don't even say he has to believe me in what I say here. But I can
only say that those who have followed me in all my posts at FFL will
recognize that in this instance, because I am going so much against the
natural direction of my pride and self-esteem, I am communicating a
truth which exceeds in its power and significance anything I have ever
said at FFL.
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960
On 12/25/2013 10:07 AM, feste37 wrote:
So here comes The Obsessive on Christmas Day, full of festive cheer
and kind words.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
*If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough in the
past couple of days to know you and Feste are lying jackasses. No need
to go back any further than that.*
Judy, I don't think anyone is interested in why Robin did or didn't
dump you. If they were, they could go back and re-read all of Robin's
messages. Go figure.
On 12/24/2013 10:38 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@...
wrote:
Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was Robin's
purported defection from me to Barry.
At some point you are going to have to face reality, Judy. The
first step in this direction would to stop the fibbing. Then, and
only then will you ever persuade anyone on this forum that you
are the only one with integrity.
In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my
history there and the characters I have interacted with.
It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry
more closely and without the intense bias that has gripped me
right from the start when Barry appeared to make himself immune
to the effects of my posts, I have concluded that essentially
Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about even
myself...
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960
Do you suppose Richard is so far gone he didn't notice that what he
quoted from Robin's post confirmed what I had just said that he
called a fib?
Poor fellow.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
On 12/25/2013 10:07 AM, feste37 wrote: So here comes The Obsessive on Christmas Day, full of festive cheer and kind words. You and Share are going to have to take up the slack here for awhile, Feste. We are going to a Christmas party hosted by a guy that is Jewish, married to a Baptist, and they are serving Hot Tamales for the main snack. Feliz Navidad!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
(Gee, Feste, did you maybe wonder whether I might be responding to something
not-so-full of festive cheer and kind words?)
In any case, I'd rather be obsessive than a lying jackass like you and
Richard. (The jackass part is because your lies, and the reasons for your
need to tell them, are so pathetically transparent.)
So here comes The Obsessive on Christmas Day, full of festive cheer and kind
words.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough in the past
couple of days to know you and Feste are lying jackasses. No need to go back
any further than that.
Judy, I don't think anyone is interested in why Robin did or didn't dump
you. If they were, they could go back and re-read all of Robin's messages. Go
figure.
On 12/24/2013 10:38 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was Robin's purported
defection from me to Barry. At some point you are going to have to face
reality, Judy. The first step in this direction would to stop the fibbing.
Then, and only then will you ever persuade anyone on this forum that you are
the only one with integrity.
In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and
the characters I have interacted with.
It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and
without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry
appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded
that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about
even myself...
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960
Do you suppose Richard is so far gone he didn't notice that what he quoted
from Robin's post confirmed what I had just said that he called a fib?
Poor fellow.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Difference is, Robin wasn't so stupid as to think others were stupid enough to take (or pretend to take) his parody seriously. Obviously he was wrong in Feste's, Vaj's, and your cases, though. So, when a Canadian posts fibs, he is posting a parody; when two guys from Texas post fibs, they are liars. Thanks for pointing that out - that might help explain why you seem so prejudiced against Texans. Go figure. On 12/25/2013 10:03 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parody http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parody If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough in the past couple of days to know you and Feste are lying jackasses. No need to go back any further than that. Just in case they are still interested there's this from the same post of Robin's, which if untrue, constitutes one of the biggest fibs ever posted to the group, and your non-reply if WAS a fib. You are usually pretty quick to make a comment on anyone posting outright lies to the group. But, in this case it looks like Robin was sincere. Either way, you are hoisted on your own petard this time. LoL! Judy, I think you an intelligent and well-meaning person; but Curtis and Barry?and even to some extent, although less passionately, Steve?have identified what is wrong with you; and I think you must be courageous enough to finally examine yourself, since I, who until just now was one of your most loyal supporters have undergone an extraordinary change of heart, and have admitted to myself that you are the person in the wrong here, that Barry is right. Would you even just for the sake of how much I have defended you in the past, think about what I have said here? http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 Judy, I don't think anyone is interested in why Robin did or didn't dump you. If they were, they could go back and re-read all of Robin's messages. Go figure. On 12/24/2013 10:38 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was Robin's purported defection from me to Barry. At some point you are going to have to face reality, Judy. The first step in this direction would to stop the fibbing. Then, and only then will you ever persuade anyone on this forum that you are the only one with integrity. In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and the characters I have interacted with. It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about even myself... http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 Do you suppose Richard is so far gone he didn't notice that what he quoted from Robin's post confirmed what I had just said that he called a fib? Poor fellow.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Just one of your innumerable problems, auth, is that you are so obsessed with
attacking other people that you lose all clarity of judgment. You attribute the
worst of motives and intentions to others when such is not the case. It is
quite possible that I have misremembered something I wrote here in the past (I
don't follow your links), but to misremember is not to lie. A lie has to be
deliberate. The person has to know he is telling an untruth. Opinions expressed
may also change over time. That is not lying, either. Your hatred distorts your
ability to use words correctly, so you make false accusations.
There is no need to respond with links that prove what you are saying,
because unlike you I have no interest in going back to the archives to check on
something I may have said a long time ago. Who cares? Only you. The truth is
that you are a malicious individual who has an obsessive need to brand people
you do not like as liars. It is a very ugly trait, auth. Of course you are
unable to see it for yourself, but again I ask you: Why do so many people on
this forum despise you? Why are you always involved in arguments here in which
everyone is a liar except you? The best thing you could do now would be to
apologize for your insulting language toward me, but that would require a level
of decency on your part that you have never before shown.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
(Gee, Feste, did you maybe wonder whether I might be responding to something
not-so-full of festive cheer and kind words?)
In any case, I'd rather be obsessive than a lying jackass like you and
Richard. (The jackass part is because your lies, and the reasons for your
need to tell them, are so pathetically transparent.)
So here comes The Obsessive on Christmas Day, full of festive cheer and kind
words.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough in the past
couple of days to know you and Feste are lying jackasses. No need to go back
any further than that.
Judy, I don't think anyone is interested in why Robin did or didn't dump
you. If they were, they could go back and re-read all of Robin's messages. Go
figure.
On 12/24/2013 10:38 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was Robin's purported
defection from me to Barry. At some point you are going to have to face
reality, Judy. The first step in this direction would to stop the fibbing.
Then, and only then will you ever persuade anyone on this forum that you are
the only one with integrity.
In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and
the characters I have interacted with.
It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and
without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry
appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded
that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about
even myself...
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960
Do you suppose Richard is so far gone he didn't notice that what he quoted
from Robin's post confirmed what I had just said that he called a fib?
Poor fellow.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Feste suppurated:
Just one of your innumerable problems, auth, is that you are so obsessed
with attacking other people that you lose all clarity of judgment. You
attribute the worst of motives and intentions to others when such is not the
case. It is quite possible that I have misremembered something I wrote here in
the past (I don't follow your links), but to misremember is not to lie. A lie
has to be deliberate. The person has to know he is telling an untruth.
And you're lying now. You saw the quote of your post I put up; you even
complimented yourself on it. So there's no issue of misremembering, no
matter how leaky your memory may be getting, nor any issue of having to follow
links, since I saved you the trouble of clicking.
Nor is there, in fact, any issue about whether Robin and I were serious in our
denunciations of each other in that exchange. We were playing games, as you
obviously knew when you wrote the post I quoted, and as everyone else knew when
they read our posts. (Oh, except Steve, who had to have the situation explained
to him in very simple terms before he understood.)
Opinions expressed may also change over time. That is not lying, either.
Your hatred distorts your ability to use words correctly, so you make false
accusations.
Mmm. Except that you claimed you didn't know, not that you had a different
opinion back then.
Feste, you can't dig yourself out of this except by distorting the facts. I
predicted you didn't have the integrity to back me up in refuting Richard's
lie, and I was right.
There is no need to respond with links that prove what you are saying,
because unlike you I have no interest in going back to the archives to check on
something I may have said a long time ago.
Again: No need. I reproduced the post in question for you, and you read it and
found it good. But then, rather than acknowledge what you knew at the time, you
pretended it was all a big mystery to you.
The very *content* of that exchange with Robin made it obvious that it was all
in fun, just as the content of your post made it obvious that you were well
aware of that. You weren't that clueless then, and you aren't that clueless now.
Who cares? Only you. The truth is that you are a malicious individual who
has an obsessive need to brand people you do not like as liars.
You have it backwards. It's their lying that leads me not to like them. You
and I had been on pretty good terms until you decided you were going to make
points with Share by attacking me, and began to use dishonesty as a weapon.
I must say it's quite a stretch to characterize someone's opposition to
dishonesty as malicious and a very ugly trait. I suggest that says a lot
more about you than it does about me.
Of course you are unable to see it for yourself, but again I ask you: Why
do so many people on this forum despise you?
I already told you why: people with integrity are never popular with those who
lack it. Why are you asking again?
Why are you always involved in arguments here in which everyone is a liar
except you?
Well, I'm not, actually. Most people here are honest, and we have arguments
that don't involve issues of dishonesty. (Ann, DoctorDumbass, Seraphita, John,
Mike, Michael, Paligap, even poor Steve come immediately to mind.) Not even all
my arguments with liars are about their dishonesty.
Or to answer another way, except you is because (duh) I don't lie.
The best thing you could do now would be to apologize for your insulting
language toward me, but that would require a level of decency on your part that
you have never before shown.
You first. If your apology is sincere, I'll likely accept it. Then we'll see
what else needs to be said. I'm not holding my breath, however.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
(Gee, Feste, did you maybe wonder whether I might be responding to something
not-so-full of festive cheer and kind words?)
In any case, I'd rather be obsessive than a lying jackass like you and
Richard. (The jackass part is because your lies, and the reasons for your
need to tell them, are so pathetically transparent.)
So here comes The Obsessive on Christmas Day, full of festive cheer and kind
words.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough in the past
couple of days to know you and Feste are lying jackasses. No need to go back
any further than that.
Judy, I don't think anyone is interested in why Robin did or didn't dump
you. If they were, they could go back and re-read all of Robin's messages. Go
figure.
On 12/24/2013 10:38 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was Robin's purported
defection from me to Barry. At some point you are going to have to face
reality, Judy. The first step in this
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Almost 99% of everything I've posted to this forum for the past ten years has been parody, Judy, but you are too stupid to realize that. The difference between you and me and Robin is that you actually take this stuff seriously. Go figure. And, not only seriously, but as something that is directed at you as a person. You are so stupid that you don't even realize when somebody is putting you on. That's what makes this so much fun and so entertaining. You feed it - and that's not a parody, but a fact. Almost everyone on this list seems to know this but you, so consider yourself punked, big time. On 12/25/2013 10:57 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Difference is, Robin wasn't so stupid as to think others were stupid enough to take (or pretend to take) his parody seriously. Obviously he was wrong in Feste's, Vaj's, and your cases, though. So, when a Canadian posts fibs, he is posting a parody; when two guys from Texas post fibs, they are liars. Thanks for pointing that out - that might help explain why you seem so prejudiced against Texans. Go figure. On 12/25/2013 10:03 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parody *If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough in the past couple of days to know you and Feste are lying jackasses. No need to go back any further than that.* Just in case they are still interested there's this from the same post of Robin's, which if untrue, constitutes one of the biggest fibs ever posted to the group, and your non-reply if WAS a fib. You are usually pretty quick to make a comment on anyone posting outright lies to the group. But, in this case it looks like Robin was sincere. Either way, you are hoisted on your own petard this time. LoL! *Judy, I think you an intelligent and well-meaning person; but Curtis and Barry?and even to some extent, although less passionately, Steve?have identified what is wrong with you; and I think you must be courageous enough to finally examine yourself, since I, who until just now was one of your most loyal supporters have undergone an extraordinary change of heart, and have admitted to myself that you are the person in the wrong here, that Barry is right. Would you even just for the sake of how much I have defended you in the past, think about what I have said here? http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960* Judy, I don't think anyone is interested in why Robin did or didn't dump you. If they were, they could go back and re-read all of Robin's messages. Go figure. On 12/24/2013 10:38 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was Robin's purported defection from me to Barry. At some point you are going to have to face reality, Judy. The first step in this direction would to stop the fibbing. Then, and only then will you ever persuade anyone on this forum that you are the only one with integrity. In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and the characters I have interacted with. It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about even myself... http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 Do you suppose Richard is so far gone he didn't notice that what he quoted from Robin's post confirmed what I had just said that he called a fib? Poor fellow.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Thanks for taking up the slack, Feste. Good work! Either Robin is a liar
or he has really put a lot over on this forum. Either way, Robin its a
parody of Judy - she can't seem to understand that she is the butt of
everyone's joke and has been for years. If what Robin said was a parody,
Judy seemed to miss it, since she failed to post a single comment about
it after Robin left the group. What Judy doesn't realize is that she is
the reason Robin left.
On 12/25/2013 11:03 AM, feste37 wrote:
Just one of your innumerable problems, auth, is that you are so
obsessed with attacking other people that you lose all clarity of
judgment. You attribute the worst of motives and intentions to others
when such is not the case. It is quite possible that I have
misremembered something I wrote here in the past (I don't follow your
links), but to misremember is not to lie. A lie has to be deliberate.
The person has to know he is telling an untruth. Opinions expressed
may also change over time. That is not lying, either. Your hatred
distorts your ability to use words correctly, so you make false
accusations.
There is no need to respond with links that prove what you are
saying, because unlike you I have no interest in going back to the
archives to check on something I may have said a long time ago. Who
cares? Only you. The truth is that you are a malicious individual who
has an obsessive need to brand people you do not like as liars. It is
a very ugly trait, auth. Of course you are unable to see it for
yourself, but again I ask you: Why do so many people on this forum
despise you? Why are you always involved in arguments here in which
everyone is a liar except you? The best thing you could do now would
be to apologize for your insulting language toward me, but that would
require a level of decency on your part that you have never before shown.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
*(Gee, Feste, did you maybe wonder whether I might be responding to
something not-so-full of festive cheer and kind words?)*
*
*
*In any case, I'd rather be obsessive than a lying jackass like you
and Richard. (The jackass part is because your lies, and the reasons
for your need to tell them, are so pathetically transparent.)*
So here comes The Obsessive on Christmas Day, full of festive cheer
and kind words.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
*If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough
in the past couple of days to know you and Feste are lying
jackasses. No need to go back any further than that.*
Judy, I don't think anyone is interested in why Robin did
or didn't dump you. If they were, they could go back and
re-read all of Robin's messages. Go figure.
On 12/24/2013 10:38 AM, authfriend@...
mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was
Robin's purported defection from me to Barry.
At some point you are going to have to face reality,
Judy. The first step in this direction would to stop the
fibbing. Then, and only then will you ever persuade
anyone on this forum that you are the only one with
integrity.
In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon
my history there and the characters I have interacted with.
It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading
Barry more closely and without the intense bias that has
gripped me right from the start when Barry appeared to
make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have
concluded that essentially Barry is right. Right not just
about Judy; but right about even myself...
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960
Do you suppose Richard is so far gone he didn't notice that
what he quoted from Robin's post confirmed what I had just
said that he called a fib?
Poor fellow.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Five, six, and seven for Feste
On 12/25/2013 6:16 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote: You are wasting you time. Judy draws her pistol at just the word you. Congratulations, Bill, you are now on Judy's shoot list. Welcome to the New World Order of the Our Dear Leader, where nothing is at seems and nothing seems like it is, and where there is a very, very thin line between parody and outright lying, and only she gets to designate which is which. Keep up the good work! You are one of the last of the dying breed that has the knowledge to help save us from the tyranny. You've still got your youth, Bill -somebody has got to take up the cause when I am no longer able to see the keyboard. I've only got about fifteen good years left. For Gawd's sake, Man, please help save us
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
No, Richard, it's trolling and lying, not parody. You want it to be taken seriously. As you know, I've mostly ignored you except when you've told lies that some of those here might not recognize as such. This past couple of weeks you've gone so far out on a limb with your trolling and lying and made yourself look so ridiculous that I'm pretty sure everyone knows now to ignore you. Almost 99% of everything I've posted to this forum for the past ten years has been parody, Judy, but you are too stupid to realize that. The difference between you and me and Robin is that you actually take this stuff seriously. Go figure. And, not only seriously, but as something that is directed at you as a person. You are so stupid that you don't even realize when somebody is putting you on. That's what makes this so much fun and so entertaining. You feed it - and that's not a parody, but a fact. Almost everyone on this list seems to know this but you, so consider yourself punked, big time. On 12/25/2013 10:57 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: Difference is, Robin wasn't so stupid as to think others were stupid enough to take (or pretend to take) his parody seriously. Obviously he was wrong in Feste's, Vaj's, and your cases, though. So, when a Canadian posts fibs, he is posting a parody; when two guys from Texas post fibs, they are liars. Thanks for pointing that out - that might help explain why you seem so prejudiced against Texans. Go figure. On 12/25/2013 10:03 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parody http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parody If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough in the past couple of days to know you and Feste are lying jackasses. No need to go back any further than that. Just in case they are still interested there's this from the same post of Robin's, which if untrue, constitutes one of the biggest fibs ever posted to the group, and your non-reply if WAS a fib. You are usually pretty quick to make a comment on anyone posting outright lies to the group. But, in this case it looks like Robin was sincere. Either way, you are hoisted on your own petard this time. LoL! Judy, I think you an intelligent and well-meaning person; but Curtis and Barry?and even to some extent, although less passionately, Steve?have identified what is wrong with you; and I think you must be courageous enough to finally examine yourself, since I, who until just now was one of your most loyal supporters have undergone an extraordinary change of heart, and have admitted to myself that you are the person in the wrong here, that Barry is right. Would you even just for the sake of how much I have defended you in the past, think about what I have said here? http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 Judy, I don't think anyone is interested in why Robin did or didn't dump you. If they were, they could go back and re-read all of Robin's messages. Go figure. On 12/24/2013 10:38 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was Robin's purported defection from me to Barry. At some point you are going to have to face reality, Judy. The first step in this direction would to stop the fibbing. Then, and only then will you ever persuade anyone on this forum that you are the only one with integrity. In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and the characters I have interacted with. It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about even myself... http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 Do you suppose Richard is so far gone he didn't notice that what he quoted from Robin's post confirmed what I had just said that he called a fib? Poor fellow.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
On 12/25/2013 12:10 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *In any case, I'd rather be obsessive than a lying jackass like you and Richard. (The jackass part is because your lies, and the reasons for your need to tell them, are so pathetically transparent.)* You're not being a very good example of a savant - as the Dear Leader of this discussion, maybe it's time for you step aside. Frankly, I'm disappointed in your output lately. Anyone coming to this discussion board these days would think this group is a being led by an obsessive minor corrector - they would probably think this group is a laughing stock of Yahoo Groups. People don't call this the Funny Farm Lounge for nothing. The question is, why aren't you contributing much to the discussion anymore? The answer is I guess, that you helped drive off all the respondents with the knowledge to discuss anything, except a few diehards like me, Barry and a few others. You managed to get rid of Curtis, Vaj, Robin, and Lawson and now we're left with just a few snarks from you and Ann. Good work!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
No, Judy, it's parody and fun to poke fun at you. You're the only one taking it seriously. On 12/25/2013 8:59 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: No, Richard, it's trolling and lying, not parody. You want it to be taken seriously. As you know, I've mostly ignored you except when you've told lies that some of those here might not recognize as such. This past couple of weeks you've gone so far out on a limb with your trolling and lying and made yourself look so ridiculous that I'm pretty sure everyone knows now to ignore you. Almost 99% of everything I've posted to this forum for the past ten years has been parody, Judy, but you are too stupid to realize that. The difference between you and me and Robin is that you actually take this stuff seriously. Go figure. And, not only seriously, but as something that is directed at you as a person. You are so stupid that you don't even realize when somebody is putting you on. That's what makes this so much fun and so entertaining. You feed it - and that's not a parody, but a fact. Almost everyone on this list seems to know this but you, so consider yourself punked, big time. On 12/25/2013 10:57 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: Difference is, Robin wasn't so stupid as to think others were stupid enough to take (or pretend to take) his parody seriously. Obviously he was wrong in Feste's, Vaj's, and your cases, though. So, when a Canadian posts fibs, he is posting a parody; when two guys from Texas post fibs, they are liars. Thanks for pointing that out - that might help explain why you seem so prejudiced against Texans. Go figure. On 12/25/2013 10:03 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parody *If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough in the past couple of days to know you and Feste are lying jackasses. No need to go back any further than that.* Just in case they are still interested there's this from the same post of Robin's, which if untrue, constitutes one of the biggest fibs ever posted to the group, and your non-reply if WAS a fib. You are usually pretty quick to make a comment on anyone posting outright lies to the group. But, in this case it looks like Robin was sincere. Either way, you are hoisted on your own petard this time. LoL! *Judy, I think you an intelligent and well-meaning person; but Curtis and Barry?and even to some extent, although less passionately, Steve?have identified what is wrong with you; and I think you must be courageous enough to finally examine yourself, since I, who until just now was one of your most loyal supporters have undergone an extraordinary change of heart, and have admitted to myself that you are the person in the wrong here, that Barry is right. Would you even just for the sake of how much I have defended you in the past, think about what I have said here? http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960* Judy, I don't think anyone is interested in why Robin did or didn't dump you. If they were, they could go back and re-read all of Robin's messages. Go figure. On 12/24/2013 10:38 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was Robin's purported defection from me to Barry. At some point you are going to have to face reality, Judy. The first step in this direction would to stop the fibbing. Then, and only then will you ever persuade anyone on this forum that you are the only one with integrity. In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and the characters I have interacted with. It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about even myself... http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 Do you suppose Richard is so far gone he didn't notice that what he quoted from Robin's post confirmed what I had just said that he called a fib? Poor fellow.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
Thanks for taking up the slack, Feste. Good work! Either Robin is a liar or he
has really put a lot over on this forum. Either way, Robin its a parody of Judy
- she can't seem to understand that she is the butt of everyone's joke and has
been for years. If what Robin said was a parody, Judy seemed to miss it, since
she failed to post a single comment about it after Robin left the group. What
Judy doesn't realize is that she is the reason Robin left.
Poor Ricky Retardo. The reason Robin left was because he had much more
important things to do, things that would be far and away beyond your
comprehension or your depth. I have this on the highest authority. Why not
obsess on something else for a while? I know, why don't you and Sharon discuss
what you talk about best - nothing.
On 12/25/2013 11:03 AM, feste37 wrote:
Just one of your innumerable problems, auth, is that you are so obsessed
with attacking other people that you lose all clarity of judgment. You
attribute the worst of motives and intentions to others when such is not the
case. It is quite possible that I have misremembered something I wrote here in
the past (I don't follow your links), but to misremember is not to lie. A lie
has to be deliberate. The person has to know he is telling an untruth. Opinions
expressed may also change over time. That is not lying, either. Your hatred
distorts your ability to use words correctly, so you make false accusations.
There is no need to respond with links that prove what you are saying,
because unlike you I have no interest in going back to the archives to check on
something I may have said a long time ago. Who cares? Only you. The truth is
that you are a malicious individual who has an obsessive need to brand people
you do not like as liars. It is a very ugly trait, auth. Of course you are
unable to see it for yourself, but again I ask you: Why do so many people on
this forum despise you? Why are you always involved in arguments here in which
everyone is a liar except you? The best thing you could do now would be to
apologize for your insulting language toward me, but that would require a level
of decency on your part that you have never before shown.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@...
wrote:
(Gee, Feste, did you maybe wonder whether I might be responding to something
not-so-full of festive cheer and kind words?)
In any case, I'd rather be obsessive than a lying jackass like you and
Richard. (The jackass part is because your lies, and the reasons for your
need to tell them, are so pathetically transparent.)
So here comes The Obsessive on Christmas Day, full of festive cheer and kind
words.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@...
wrote:
If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough in the past
couple of days to know you and Feste are lying jackasses. No need to go back
any further than that.
Judy, I don't think anyone is interested in why Robin did or didn't dump
you. If they were, they could go back and re-read all of Robin's messages. Go
figure.
On 12/24/2013 10:38 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was Robin's purported
defection from me to Barry. At some point you are going to have to face
reality, Judy. The first step in this direction would to stop the fibbing.
Then, and only then will you ever persuade anyone on this forum that you are
the only one with integrity.
In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and
the characters I have interacted with.
It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and
without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry
appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded
that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about
even myself...
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960
Do you suppose Richard is so far gone he didn't notice that what he quoted
from Robin's post confirmed what I had just said that he called a fib?
Poor fellow.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
On 12/25/2013 12:10 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
In any case, I'd rather be obsessive than a lying jackass like you and
Richard. (The jackass part is because your lies, and the reasons for your
need to tell them, are so pathetically transparent.)Retardo vomited: ...and
now we're left with just a few snarks from you and Ann. That is a good one
considering you have basically taken over the forum and are posting
approximately 25% of the crap here.
Good work!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
No, Richard, it's trolling and lying, not parody. You want it to be taken seriously. You want people to react. That's why you went so crazy when I started using that macro to shut you down. You kept having to think up new trolls, and finally you went over the edge. There have been many people who have taken you seriously, as you know. Michael did until I clued him in. Poor Share still does, to the point where she even tries to help you with your lies (with lies she picked up from Barry, ironically enough). But there really is no hope for Share. You should have some compassion for her cluelessness and not lead her on. She even took your post to Ann just now seriously. No, Judy, it's parody and fun to poke fun at you. You're the only one taking it seriously. On 12/25/2013 8:59 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: No, Richard, it's trolling and lying, not parody. You want it to be taken seriously. As you know, I've mostly ignored you except when you've told lies that some of those here might not recognize as such. This past couple of weeks you've gone so far out on a limb with your trolling and lying and made yourself look so ridiculous that I'm pretty sure everyone knows now to ignore you. Almost 99% of everything I've posted to this forum for the past ten years has been parody, Judy, but you are too stupid to realize that. The difference between you and me and Robin is that you actually take this stuff seriously. Go figure. And, not only seriously, but as something that is directed at you as a person. You are so stupid that you don't even realize when somebody is putting you on. That's what makes this so much fun and so entertaining. You feed it - and that's not a parody, but a fact. Almost everyone on this list seems to know this but you, so consider yourself punked, big time. On 12/25/2013 10:57 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: Difference is, Robin wasn't so stupid as to think others were stupid enough to take (or pretend to take) his parody seriously. Obviously he was wrong in Feste's, Vaj's, and your cases, though. So, when a Canadian posts fibs, he is posting a parody; when two guys from Texas post fibs, they are liars. Thanks for pointing that out - that might help explain why you seem so prejudiced against Texans. Go figure. On 12/25/2013 10:03 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parody http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parody If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough in the past couple of days to know you and Feste are lying jackasses. No need to go back any further than that. Just in case they are still interested there's this from the same post of Robin's, which if untrue, constitutes one of the biggest fibs ever posted to the group, and your non-reply if WAS a fib. You are usually pretty quick to make a comment on anyone posting outright lies to the group. But, in this case it looks like Robin was sincere. Either way, you are hoisted on your own petard this time. LoL! Judy, I think you an intelligent and well-meaning person; but Curtis and Barry?and even to some extent, although less passionately, Steve?have identified what is wrong with you; and I think you must be courageous enough to finally examine yourself, since I, who until just now was one of your most loyal supporters have undergone an extraordinary change of heart, and have admitted to myself that you are the person in the wrong here, that Barry is right. Would you even just for the sake of how much I have defended you in the past, think about what I have said here? http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 Judy, I don't think anyone is interested in why Robin did or didn't dump you. If they were, they could go back and re-read all of Robin's messages. Go figure. On 12/24/2013 10:38 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was Robin's purported defection from me to Barry. At some point you are going to have to face reality, Judy. The first step in this direction would to stop the fibbing. Then, and only then will you ever persuade anyone on this forum that you are the only one with integrity. In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and the characters I have interacted with. It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about even myself... http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 Do you suppose Richard is so far gone he didn't
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
On 12/25/2013 9:35 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: The reason Robin left was because he had much more important things to do That doesn't say much for Judy, since she's still here posting. Go figure. You probably know Robin better than anyone here. Does this sound to you like a parody? But you see we were wrong. I can't speak for those who remain hostile to Barry; but I think, as in the case of Saul, there should be some hard thinking about this whole matter And I would ask at the very least that there is a moratorium on this Get Barry Campaign (which seemingly never ends) until there has been time to allow what I have said here to infiltrate the deeper regions of the heart as well as the mind. I am sorry, Judy. But this feels better. And I can only wish for you to have the experience I am having now. http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
On 12/25/2013 9:38 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: Retardo vomited: ...and now we're left with just a few snarks from you and Ann. That is a good one considering you have basically taken over the forum and are posting approximately 25% of the crap here. Now you're sounding just like your mentor, Judy. This post of yours is a good example of snark. Good work! But, I think of my posting to FFL as taking up the slack. You two gals are being slackers - if you don't find what I post interesting, just post something interesting yourself. Maybe I'll post a comment or maybe I won't. It's that simple - no need to get so personal - that's considered to be bad form. Both of you are really smart, but it's just too easy to fall into the snark trap. It looks like that 's what's happened to Judy too. So, I'm going to follow Barry's philosophy: I DON'T GIVE A CRAP WHAT YOU THINK OF ME. Have a nice day.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
The only one going over the edge here is you, Ms Stein. If creating a phoney macro isn't going over the edge I don't know what is! Nothing I post is to be taken seriously - this is a chat room for discussion, not a one-person judge and jury. Apparently you can't even tell the difference between opinion and the truth, OR a parody. It's a free country the last time I checked - if you don't like my messages, you are free to leave and go back over to Google Groups where you came from. You are not going to shut me down - do I make myself clear? I DON'T CARE WHAT ANYONE THINKS - WHETHER THEY REACT OR NOT. But, it is very strange that you've reacted in such a mean and un-sophisticated manner to a few informational messages posted to an open internet discussion group. I'd say you have gone over the edge. More like bat-shit crazy, to paraphrase Barry. Go figure. It's going to be a new year soon, and I've got plenty of time for posting these days. So, go ahead, just try and shoot me down. You won't shut me down until you pry these cold, dead hands from my keyboard. You've tried to shut me down for over a decade and you have failed. It's not over till it's over, Lady. On 12/25/2013 9:38 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: No, Richard, it's trolling and lying, not parody. You want it to be taken seriously. You want people to react. That's why you went so crazy when I started using that macro to shut you down. You kept having to think up new trolls, and finally you went over the edge. There have been many people who have taken you seriously, as you know. Michael did until I clued him in. Poor Share still does, to the point where she even tries to help you with your lies (with lies she picked up from Barry, ironically enough). But there really is no hope for Share. You should have some compassion for her cluelessness and not lead her on. She even took your post to Ann just now seriously. No, Judy, it's parody and fun to poke fun at you. You're the only one taking it seriously. On 12/25/2013 8:59 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: No, Richard, it's trolling and lying, not parody. You want it to be taken seriously. As you know, I've mostly ignored you except when you've told lies that some of those here might not recognize as such. This past couple of weeks you've gone so far out on a limb with your trolling and lying and made yourself look so ridiculous that I'm pretty sure everyone knows now to ignore you. Almost 99% of everything I've posted to this forum for the past ten years has been parody, Judy, but you are too stupid to realize that. The difference between you and me and Robin is that you actually take this stuff seriously. Go figure. And, not only seriously, but as something that is directed at you as a person. You are so stupid that you don't even realize when somebody is putting you on. That's what makes this so much fun and so entertaining. You feed it - and that's not a parody, but a fact. Almost everyone on this list seems to know this but you, so consider yourself punked, big time. On 12/25/2013 10:57 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: Difference is, Robin wasn't so stupid as to think others were stupid enough to take (or pretend to take) his parody seriously. Obviously he was wrong in Feste's, Vaj's, and your cases, though. So, when a Canadian posts fibs, he is posting a parody; when two guys from Texas post fibs, they are liars. Thanks for pointing that out - that might help explain why you seem so prejudiced against Texans. Go figure. On 12/25/2013 10:03 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parody *If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough in the past couple of days to know you and Feste are lying jackasses. No need to go back any further than that.* Just in case they are still interested there's this from the same post of Robin's, which if untrue, constitutes one of the biggest fibs ever posted to the group, and your non-reply if WAS a fib. You are usually pretty quick to make a comment on anyone posting outright lies to the group. But, in this case it looks like Robin was sincere. Either way, you are hoisted on your own petard this time. LoL! *Judy, I think you an intelligent and well-meaning person; but Curtis and Barry?and even to some extent, although less passionately, Steve?have identified what is wrong with you; and I think you must be courageous enough to finally examine yourself, since I, who until just now was one of your most loyal supporters have undergone an extraordinary change of heart, and have admitted to myself that you are the person in the wrong here, that Barry is right. Would you even just for the sake of how much I have defended you in the past, think about what I have said here?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Richard shoots himself in both feet: The only one going over the edge here is you, Ms Stein. If creating a phoney macro isn't going over the edge I don't know what is! Nothing I post is to be taken seriously Yup, that'll be my new macro.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
BTW, Richard, if you'd like to start using macros for all your repetitive text, here's the macro program I've been using: http://www.tucows.com/preview/518190/AllKeys-Macro http://www.tucows.com/preview/518190/AllKeys-Macro It's free for the first 30 days, then it costs $30 to register it. Installs very easily in Windows, ridiculously simple to use, at least for automating text strings. I haven't tried any of its bells and whistles for doing fancier stuff, but maybe you'll find them helpful too. Richard shoots himself in both feet: The only one going over the edge here is you, Ms Stein. If creating a phoney macro isn't going over the edge I don't know what is! Nothing I post is to be taken seriously Yup, that'll be my new macro.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Five, six, and seven for Feste
On 12/23/2013 8:04 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: Robin was never serious on this forum about attacking or denigrating or questioning Judy. Let's just say Robin was less than impressed with Judy's attack stance, calling Robin Zebra Boy in a really talking down to him with childish comments like Back of Buster. That's Judy's typical attack mode. Go figure. And, Robin was obviously unhappy about getting outed and his real name revealed by the other mean girl, Raunchydog. You three, with some help from Barry, Vaj, and Bob tried your best to get rid of Robin, the first fully enlightened TMer. After reading all of Robin's messages I get the feeling that Robin thinks you are all idiots. You guys don't even deserve someone of Robin's intellectual caliber on this forum. Gawd! It was just embarrassing!
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Five, six, and seven for Feste
No, let's say this (if I can stop laughing long enough to hit the macro key):
This is all trolling and lying, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except
Xeno and, obviously, Richard) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed
refutation, let me know.
He's lying about me, Robin, Raunchy, Ann, and Bob.
And allow me to quote my attack on Robin:
Yeah, I'll certainly give her that: she's smart. Knows a lot.
She makes me more careful than I otherwise would be if she
weren't around. I am sure she is a very nice girl.
Trying to recruit me, are you, Zebra Boy? Think I was born
yesterday? Think I fell off a turnip truck? Well, I'm not
so green as I am grassy-looking, so back off, buster.
guffaw
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
On 12/23/2013 8:04 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
Robin was never serious on this forum about attacking or denigrating or
questioning Judy. Let's just say Robin was less than impressed with Judy's
attack stance, calling Robin Zebra Boy in a really talking down to him with
childish comments like Back of Buster. That's Judy's typical attack mode. Go
figure.
And, Robin was obviously unhappy about getting outed and his real name
revealed by the other mean girl, Raunchydog. You three, with some help from
Barry, Vaj, and Bob tried your best to get rid of Robin, the first fully
enlightened TMer. After reading all of Robin's messages I get the feeling that
Robin thinks you are all idiots. You guys don't even deserve someone of Robin's
intellectual caliber on this forum. Gawd! It was just embarrassing!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
I have no idea what you are talking about, auth. What post of mine did you quote? And kindly stop impugning my integrity.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
See this post of mine (the one I told you to go back to that Richard had quoted from) for the embarrassing quote from your post: http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/367880 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/367880 And I'll stop impugning your integrity when you start showing some. Feste blustered: I have no idea what you are talking about, auth. What post of mine did you quote? And kindly stop impugning my integrity.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Five, six, and seven for Feste
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
On 12/23/2013 8:04 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
Robin was never serious on this forum about attacking or denigrating or
questioning Judy. Let's just say Robin was less than impressed with Judy's
attack stance, calling Robin Zebra Boy in a really talking down to him with
childish comments like Back of Buster. That's Judy's typical attack mode. Go
figure.
And, Robin was obviously unhappy about getting outed and his real name
revealed by the other mean girl, Raunchydog. You three, with some help from
Barry, Vaj, and Bob tried your best to get rid of Robin, the first fully
enlightened TMer. After reading all of Robin's messages I get the feeling that
Robin thinks you are all idiots. You guys don't even deserve someone of Robin's
intellectual caliber on this forum. Gawd! It was just embarrassing!
http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-brain-death.htm
http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-brain-death.htm
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
(Snip)
Feste whines:
And kindly stop impugning my integrity.
Only you can do that, buddy.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Five, six, and seven for Feste
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
No, let's say this (if I can stop laughing long enough to hit the macro key):
This is all trolling and lying, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except
Xeno and, obviously, Richard) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed
refutation, let me know.
He's lying about me, Robin, Raunchy, Ann, and Bob.
And allow me to quote my attack on Robin:
Yeah, I'll certainly give her that: she's smart. Knows a lot.
She makes me more careful than I otherwise would be if she
weren't around. I am sure she is a very nice girl.
Trying to recruit me, are you, Zebra Boy? Think I was born
yesterday? Think I fell off a turnip truck? Well, I'm not
so green as I am grassy-looking, so back off, buster.
guffaw
Oh no, Judy, this is very serious stuff here. I can see the animosity just
bursting off the page, surely you can recognize it to. It is at about the third
sentence that you can feel Robin unable to continue posting here due to such
outrage directed his way. And at about sentence number four he is realizing
that your intellectual capacity is so far beneath his that he will never return
to FFL to experience the ongoing vacuousness of it all. Yessiree, Richard
really picked up on the truth here. I wonder if, when he watches Duck Dynasty,
he figures these people are really Shakespearian actors on loan from The Old
Vic.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
On 12/23/2013 8:04 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
Robin was never serious on this forum about attacking or denigrating or
questioning Judy. Let's just say Robin was less than impressed with Judy's
attack stance, calling Robin Zebra Boy in a really talking down to him with
childish comments like Back of Buster. That's Judy's typical attack mode. Go
figure.
And, Robin was obviously unhappy about getting outed and his real name
revealed by the other mean girl, Raunchydog. You three, with some help from
Barry, Vaj, and Bob tried your best to get rid of Robin, the first fully
enlightened TMer. After reading all of Robin's messages I get the feeling that
Robin thinks you are all idiots. You guys don't even deserve someone of Robin's
intellectual caliber on this forum. Gawd! It was just embarrassing!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
That was a pretty good post of mine, but I have no idea at all of whether the
stuff between you and Robin was serious or not. That was just my reaction at
that moment to a few posts. I do recall others in which Robin disparaged you in
strong terms. Whether he meant it or not, only he can say. I can't. Also, I did
not read all the posts. You have a real problem, auth. For me and most other
people, this forum is an ephemeral thing, like conversation. It's not an
academic journal or a reference book. I think you are the only one here who
obsessively combs the archives trying to prove other people wrong. It is a most
peculiar trait of yours. And of course it is always YOU who has the integrity
and OTHERS who lack it. Do you think there might be something wrong with that
picture? Of course you don't, because you lack self-awareness, good judgment,
and a sense of fairness. You also are a warped individual who gets pleasure
from being nasty. Have you ever wondered why so many people on this forum
dislike you? No, of course you haven't, for the reasons noted above.
And please also tell your silly little sidekick Ann that I am not reading her
messages, so she is wasting her time writing them. Tell her to go shake her
ears.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
See this post of mine (the one I told you to go back to that Richard had
quoted from) for the embarrassing quote from your post:
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/367880
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/367880
And I'll stop impugning your integrity when you start showing some.
Feste blustered:
I have no idea what you are talking about, auth. What post of mine did you
quote? And kindly stop impugning my integrity.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Five, six, and seven for Feste
On 12/24/2013 7:38 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: This is all trolling and lying, stuff Richard made up Let's just say Robin was less than impressed...
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Five, six, and seven for Feste
On 12/24/2013 9:12 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: Yessiree, Richard really picked up on the truth here. It was just embarrassing!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Feste squirmed: That was a pretty good post of mine, but I have no idea at all of whether the stuff between you and Robin was serious or not. Bullshit. You knew very well it wasn't serious. You'd never have written like that if you'd thought it was; more to the point, you couldn't have read enough of it to write that post without having realized we were kidding around. That was just my reaction at that moment to a few posts. I do recall others in which Robin disparaged you in strong terms. Whether he meant it or not, only he can say. I can't. I can say. He didn't mean it. It was a game we played. We enjoyed it, and so did others. And you made more comments than just the post I quoted making it clear you understood what was going on. Also, I did not read all the posts. You have a real problem, auth. For me and most other people, this forum is an ephemeral thing, like conversation. It's not an academic journal or a reference book. I think you are the only one here who obsessively combs the archives trying to prove other people wrong. A conversation is no fun if some of the participants attack others with falsehoods and attempted deceptions. Apparently you enjoy that kind of thing. I don't, and others don't either. It is a most peculiar trait of yours. And of course it is always YOU who has the integrity and OTHERS who lack it. Do you think there might be something wrong with that picture? Er, I have no reason to go after folks who have integrity. Do you think there might be something wrong with your logic? Of course you don't, because you lack self-awareness, good judgment, and a sense of fairness. You also are a warped individual who gets pleasure from being nasty. Translation: Feste doesn't like it when his lack of integrity gets exposed. Have you ever wondered why so many people on this forum dislike you? No, of course you haven't, for the reasons noted above. Actually I don't wonder because I know exactly why some here don't like me. The truth-teller is never popular with corrupt individuals. And please also tell your silly little sidekick Ann that I am not reading her messages, so she is wasting her time writing them. Tell her to go shake her ears . Fight your own battles, coward. She has you nailed. See this post of mine (the one I told you to go back to that Richard had quoted from) for the embarrassing quote from your post: http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/367880 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/367880 And I'll stop impugning your integrity when you start showing some. Feste blustered: I have no idea what you are talking about, auth. What post of mine did you quote? And kindly stop impugning my integrity.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
That was a pretty good post of mine, but I have no idea at all of whether
the stuff between you and Robin was serious or not. That was just my reaction
at that moment to a few posts.
Yes, it was a pretty good post. Let's just put it up again, shall we? The
links below are to the exchange he's referring to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301020
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301020
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301104
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301104
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301143
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301143
Gosh, golly. This is serious stuff. It is shaping up as a Shakespearean play,
a clash of mighty opposites. The next scene should be good. The audience must
already be pondering the mysterious revelation below that authfriend has been
working with MZ for 17 YEARS behind the scenes to discredit Barry. Can it be
so? Really? And who, we absolutely must know, are the equally mysterious
masters that MZ serves? And what about the capitalized Others for whom
authfriend declares she is working? Who on earth might they be?
And I thought all this time that FFL was just an Internet chat forum. Now I see
it is a cloak-and-dagger tale of mighty forces, shifting alliances, outrageous
betrayals, and turbulent passions. Perhaps there is a playwright behind all
this, who is actually plotting a way for the reviled poster from Holland to
regain lost ground and reign supreme, his enemies confounded and at his mercy.
Will he choose magnanimity or revenge? We shall find out.
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/301029
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/301029
Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was Robin's purported
defection from me to Barry. Robin's subject heading was Revelation and
Conversion, and he styled his conversion as similar to that of St. Paul on
the road to Damascus. Dunno about anybody else, but I have a whole lot of
trouble imagining that Feste took that seriously. He may lack integrity, but he
isn't stupid.
I do recall others in which Robin disparaged you in strong terms. Whether he
meant it or not, only he can say. I can't. Also, I did not read all the posts.
You have a real problem, auth. For me and most other people, this forum is an
ephemeral thing, like conversation. It's not an academic journal or a reference
book. I think you are the only one here who obsessively combs the archives
trying to prove other people wrong. It is a most peculiar trait of yours. And
of course it is always YOU who has the integrity and OTHERS who lack it. Do you
think there might be something wrong with that picture? Of course you don't,
because you lack self-awareness, good judgment, and a sense of fairness. You
also are a warped individual who gets pleasure from being nasty. Have you ever
wondered why so many people on this forum dislike you? No, of course you
haven't, for the reasons noted above.
And please also tell your silly little sidekick Ann that I am not reading her
messages, so she is wasting her time writing them. Tell her to go shake her
ears.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
See this post of mine (the one I told you to go back to that Richard had
quoted from) for the embarrassing quote from your post:
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/367880
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/367880
And I'll stop impugning your integrity when you start showing some.
Feste blustered:
I have no idea what you are talking about, auth. What post of mine did you
quote? And kindly stop impugning my integrity.
