Jon Stockill wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I want to create the support for draping roads, railroads and streams,
one of
the goals. But I don't know what is this. I have to improve the
current roads,
railroads and streams with new textures or I have to change something
or what.
Can
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I just committed a set of changes to move the hi res screen capture
feature back towards a useable state. The hires screenshot snapper now
uses the same render code as the normal res screen shot snapper which
uses the same render code as the main program. That should
John Wojnaroski wrote:
Fred wrote:
John Wojnaroski wrote:
Does anyone have a favorite network utility/packet sniffer? I'm looking
at sniffit from the Debian package, but not all that happy with it.
Ethereal but only on packets that transit through an ethernet card
( doesn't work on the loopback
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..but the idea can be inverted: Maybe a cvs signature file to flag off
stuff you're happy with? So I just set my script to check for that new
flag file, and on its absense, just do cvs co to last Saturday night?
In situations like that one is way too busy fixing stuff to
David Megginson wrote:
I last built FlightGear successfully on 15 August (I hadn't realized
it had been so long). I had to make one small change to get to to
build today, which I've put in CVS, but now I'm having a problem with
OpenGL initialization. My old binary (also built with SDL) still
Dave Perry wrote:
Other information: I have recent cvs of plib, openal, SimGear,
FlightGear (recent=Thursday evening).
plib configure switches --build=athlon
openal configure switches --build=athlon --enable-alsa --enable-optimize
SimGear configure switches --build=athlon --with-jpeg-factory
Antonio Pennino wrote:
It is known (+ or -) the date of release (win32 binary) of new
version?
If Curtis can find the time, the plan is to release it this weekend. But
only _if_ Curtis can find the time.
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL
Jeroen Hoppenbrouwers wrote:
Hi guys,
First post on the mailing list after lurking for a while. My name is Jeroen
Hoppenbrouwers and I have been active for about five years in a niche of the
flight sim world, the (very active) community around Aerowinx 747-400
Precision Simulator
Boris Koenig wrote:
However, there are two new issues:
1) While it wasn't a real problem to use easyxml.cxx's readXML
to simply copy a XML file's structure to a particular node
within the property tree, there doesn't seem to exist a
similar wrapper for WRITING XML files within easyxml.cxx -
Georg Vollnhals wrote:
http://www.nord-com.net/vollnhals-bremen/landsat_7.htm
These screenshots are rather old and made for other purposes. But you may
see the limits of these low-res satellite data. They are good as a very
realistic background but you loose important landmarks (smaller streets,
Boris Koenig wrote:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 18:58:16 +0100, Mat wrote in message
I have been asking Getmapping if it is permissible use for people to
buy their CDs and then use the exported image in FG in a personal
flight sim.
..wrong question; IMHO you should have said _GPL_
Boris Koenig wrote:
Boris Koenig wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
Generating a dynamic menu structure might be harder than you think,
As you didn't yet reply to the ideas that I mentioned in this thread,
I simply tried the approach that I described.
Good, I am not always able to respond quickly.
I have
Boris Koenig wrote:
Anyway, I am going to give this also a shot and contact some companies
that provide aerial/satellite image data, could anybody here provide the
details concerning the requirements that need to be met for an image
to be suitable to be used as a texture for FlightGear ?
One meter
Martin Spott wrote:
I'm pretty sure they exist albeit D-FOTO is a Caravan, used for
photogrammetry of the nearby brown coal mining. They have a nice 19
rack inside the cabin for analysis equipment,
So now you are going to provide me with all kinds of pretty pictures
which can be used to
Boris Koenig wrote:
But there's another thing in this context - it's about the VERSION file
in $FG_ROOT/data not containing pre-release tags, I think Jim Wilson
mentioned a couple of weeks ago that this is supposed to be like that,
this however causes a problem for those users who want to apply a
Boris Koenig wrote:
I have now looked into dozens of source files, but I don't seem to be
able to find those files that are responsible for the XML handling,
respectively loading parsing the PropertyList XML files, so I
apologize in advance, but: what's the name of the classes that are used
or
Martin Spott wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
I'm pretty sure they exist albeit D-FOTO is a Caravan, used for
photogrammetry of the nearby brown coal mining. They have a nice 19
rack inside the cabin for analysis equipment,
So now you are going to provide me with all kinds
Mat Churchill wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
So now you are going to provide me with all kinds of pretty
pictures which can be used to create textures?
I'm certainly planning exactly this, have been messing around with low
budget aerial photography. This device (MK1, now on MK3)
http://www.projects
Boris Koenig wrote:
I'm sure this has been brought up before, but has anybody ever really
*tried* to ask companies that sell satellite imagery on CD-ROM for their
permission to use derived work (= FG textures) freely in an opensource
project ?
As long as not the actual product itself can be
Boris Koenig wrote:
What do you guys (mainly SimGear FDM folks) think ?
My personal preference would be to add a const char *get_version(void)
function to SGSubsystem, and add a function vectorconst
char*get_version(void) to SGSubsystemMgr. This would remind everyone
who designs a new module
Boris Koenig wrote:
Hi !
Guess, who's here ;-)
A quick question: I'm about to finish several smaller Nasal dialogs,
now I wanted to add a simple flight planning dialog using Nasal,
I thought I would find the necessary elements for the combo boxes
under /sim/navdb within the property tree, but
Boris Koenig wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
Boris Koenig wrote:
where else exported within the property tree, or is it simply not
yet there ?
It's not there, and it probably never will be.
woohoo - don't say that: I was just about to make a terrible mess of
the code ;-)
No need, that has already been
Boris Koenig wrote:
- I promise to never again send uncompressed postings to this list ;-)
Promises, promises.
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Hi,
I made a terrible mess of the FlightGear CVS repository today by adding
(what I thought was) one extra code cleanup I accidentally committed the
complete local tree which contained changes that were not ready for
release yet.
I tried to get it compiling (which succeeded) but got a runtime
Martin Spott wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
+ OpenAL setup for general use (Linux)
+ -
+ As of July 2004 it is best to add at least the following line to your
+ ~/.fgfsrc file on Linux because it wil find out what audio backend to
+ use, starting with the most
Vivian Meazza wrote:
It's just occurred to me that I'm using my local version, so it's possible
that I haven't asked Erik to upload one of the multitude of files it
requires to alter one parameter, or there's something wrong with the files I
sent in. It's definitely OK here with your model. I'll
Norman Vine wrote:
Boris Koenig writes:
Anyway - if I'm not terribly wrong you should have CVS access,
FYI I do *not* have CVS write permission
And for a good reason, others might not be able to catch up with the
number of CVS commits ...
Erik
___
Vivian Meazza wrote:
On compiling the CVS download under Cygwin this morning I get the following
error:
tilemgr.cxx: In member function `void FGTileMgr::update_queues()':
tilemgr.cxx:288: error: `size' undeclared (first use this function)
tilemgr.cxx:288: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
Luca Masera wrote:
Hi,
I've done some work on the particle system using the primitives of PLIB.
I've however some problems. The first and the second screenshots are made with
the simulator freezed and the only difference is the position of the head of the pilot.
Why the object change their
Boris Koenig wrote:
Because of this obvious advantage (particularly for users with slow
dial-up connections, but also for those among us who have broadband
access, but don't like to wait... ) we would now like to know what
the rest of you thinks about adding those tardiff based patches as an
Martin Spott wrote:
Hello,
I must admit that it's not completely clear to me if this stems from
using GCC-3.4.1 or simply from the recent changed to JSBsim (I assume
the latter) so I'd be happy if anyone could tell me:
make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/FlightGear/src/FDM/JSBSim'
[...]
Martin Spott wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
They really should be fabs() in both cases, both GetState() and
GetTolerance() return a double instead of an int.
Thanks !
Any idea why this doesn't show up on other platforms ?
I think the other compilers just issue a warning and convert the double
Boris Koenig wrote:
Hi !
Two things:
1)I would like to be able to display a simple text string at
runtime in the upper left corner of the screen using
Nasal (in order to display simple in-flight information).
I could imagine that something like this already exists, i.e.
for
Dave Perry wrote:
3. f104 - no power. This used to work.
I'm baffled about this one. It's not clear to me what is causing this.
4. j3cub - Aborted. This used to work.
This dos work for me. If it's an assertion problem then it is caused
by OpenAL. Just try to start FlightGear again and things
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
For the moment, we have this line in system_mgr.cxx :
// set_subsystem( submodel, new SubmodelSystem() );
Do we want to keep this line commented for the upcoming release
or could we enable it ? I ask that for the next win32 binary
build ?
Good question. At first I left it
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
We'd like to do another release of FlightGear/Simgear in the next week
or two. I'm starting to roll together the first round of pre-releases.
Mostly this release should fix problems and discrepancies with the
v0.9.5 release of FlightGear with not a ton of new
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
I am looking for the effect created by submodels and I
still haven't saw one. The line in system_mgr.cxx is
uncommented and I started with the f16 (--aircraft=f16 )
Now, what I am supposed to see. According to the f16-set.xml
file, Ctrl-F is supposed to trigger flares,
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
I am looking for the effect created by submodels and I
still haven't saw one. The line in system_mgr.cxx is
uncommented and I started with the f16 (--aircraft=f16 )
Now, what I am supposed to see. According to the f16-set.xml
David Luff wrote:
Finally, is there a way to make an operation dependent on two properties in an xml sound file? - I'd like to make a further drop in engine volume dependent on both /sim/current-view/internal AND /sim/general/headphones (or something like that) being true.
If you mean, make and
Boris Koenig wrote:
P.S.: Erik, I don't seem to have received a reply to my last eMail
from you, just tell me if you need more clarification - otherwise
some of the questions that I asked are still left open and I would
like to get definite feedback regarding the probability for acceptance
of my
Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
Melchior seems to have started migrating stuff from
the cockpit subdir to the instrumentation subdir. This should also be
made configurable, just like the stuff that's already in instrumentation.
Note that this was the intention of the Systems subdirectory, depreciate
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..myself, I'd like to see low tech front ends to FlightGear,
to run in clusters on old junk that cannot do OpenGL.
High end upside, is clustered OpenGL, the kind you
see in movie theaters. ;-)
Just create a library that is OpenGL compatible, and you're free to do
anything
Lee Elliott wrote:
Hello all,
...something not too important for the TODO list perhaps...
In a/c that have one or more VC views there's a visible 'jitter' when looking
at parts of the a/c, most notably in my experience, with the
windshield/canopy frames.
While I can imagine that the amount is
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 19:10:41 +0200, Erik wrote in message
Just create a library that is OpenGL compatible, and you're free to do
anything that frightens the rest of us.
..http://sam.zoy.org/projects/libcaca/caca-sabre.png scary enough? ;-)
Great, now I have troubles getting
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
What is the likely hood of having the ability to save flight replays in the
near future?
We hardly work with likely hoods. If one of the developers is bored (and
feels like it) it might well be it gets included within a week.
Otherwise it could take up as long as
Gunnstein Lye wrote:
When will flightgear have a model of this?;-)
http://www.yves-rossy.com/en/
(see the jet man link at the top right)
That wouldn't be too hard to model. Find appropriate airfoil data (lift
and drag) and we're almost set ...
Erik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
when I run fgfs, I got the following errors:
GLUT: Fatal Error in fgfs: failed to create OpenGL rendering context.
Could you please tell me why?
This is often caused by the fact that FlightGear wants to run in a
higher bits-per-pixel mode. You might want tot
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Also, you will need to grab openal (www.openal.org) from cvs and
build/compile that. Unfortunately they don't have versioned releases so
the best you can do is just grab their current cvs.
They recently started releasing snapshots of CVS versions that are
considered safe
Jon Berndt wrote:
Can someone tell me what is the _bare_ set of SimGear files needed to allow
compilation of
EasyXML?
I'm afraid you'll have to use the complete SimGear/simgear/xml directory
for it to work correctly. Expat (the library EasyXML relies upon) has
never been considered small ...
Vivian Meazza wrote:
Luca Masera wrote:
Have you downloaded the latest version of the data from cvs? The puff files
(puff.ac, puff.xml) should be included in ../data/models/geometry.
Also, don't forget to uncomment line 21 of
FlightGear/src/Systems/system_mgr.cxx to enable submodel support.
Dale E. Edmons wrote:
Hi all,
I just did a cvs update -d -P and tried to recompile but got the
following error(s):
Try updating FlightGear CVS again, I just fixed this.
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..in sim's, it's legal to buzz town, no? ;-)
No, FAA and JAA regulations for simulators forbid that ...
Erik
(;-))
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Chris Metzler wrote:
Are the lengths of displaced threshholds and stopways given for a
particular runway in runways.dat included in that runway's given
length? In other words, for this runyway:
R KSFO 01L 37.618096 -122.376161 27.70 7502 200 NARHN NYNN 4910
NNVN 00
is the length of
Roman Grigoriev wrote:
on ATI it works fine but you have to have at least geforce fx or ATI
9xxx card on other cards it doesn't work
The question is: do you need this?
It all sounds very nice, but I reckon that at the moment it is only
useful for around 1% of our users (and developers).
More
Chris Metzler wrote:
Heh, sorry, *which* is true? There are two possibilities above. I'm
guessing you mean the latter (that the length refers to the runway
alone, and not the total length of paved surface)?
As far as I know it is the total length of the paved surface (including
displaced
Sky Rudolph wrote:
I believe that this has been addressed before, but I am unable to find it in
the archives, my apologies if this has already been beat to death.
I would like to use FlightGear to display data from a real aircraft. I
would like to feed lat/lon/alt airspeed/attitude/control
Jon S Berndt wrote:
So, my question is: What is the philosophy behind loading various
classes with their own data from the config file using EasyXML callbacks?
You could store the data into a property tree and let every subsystem
scan it's own directory. This tree could be detached from the main
Jim Wilson wrote:
What happens on a kill/int/segfault? Can it be changed to something like a
single pixel or some other unobtrusive thing instead?
That should work also because it is changed to the normal cursor in the
atexit() function (but I haven't tested it because it doesn't happen for
me,
Erik Hofman wrote:
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
What specific changes are you refering to?
Fixes for the Scenery Loading dialog that now loads much faster on low
end hardware because it is frame rate independent (thanks to Frederic).
Lots of small fixes (joystick configurations, Nasal fuel handling
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Here's another problem: $ fgfs --aircraft=c172-610x-jsbsim makes fgfs
abort, because this redirects to ../c172r/c172r-jsbsim-base.xml, which
tries to include c172r-base.xml. But this file is searched in c172/, not
in c172r (where it could be found).
This is fixed in CVS
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Are you sure js changes are fixes ? I saw problem reports recently.
They seem to have been fixed. But I wouldn't know, I don't have a joystick.
I don't update plib for ages and I am not keen to do it after what I read.
Moreover, we rely on plib released versions, not CVS,
Matevz Jekovec wrote:
Why not simply name it 0.9.5.1 (latest kernel is 2.6.8.1 as well as they
found a tiny bug in 2.6.8 version). Letters behind a version could mess
with things like a for Alpha, b for Beta, RC for Release Candidate and
so on. I think 0.9.5.1 is the only logical explenation to
Matevz Jekovec wrote:
There were already few discussions about this a couple of months ago
when terrasync was launched.
My question is when I run terrasync and fgfs and fly where there's no
terrain available yet, do I need to restart fgfs session for the new
terrain to take effect, or are fgfs
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I usually plan on a full week of *all* my non-work spare time plus some
to get a release out. Right now I'm getting hammered at work and at
home so I don't have *any* spare time. I have to go out of town for the
entire weekend which means I'll be playing catchup most of
Giles Robertson wrote:
My own take on funding for FlightGear is that funding FGFS itself may be difficult, but we might well be able to get corporate funding for developing SimGear as a simulation kernel. Flight Simulators don't appeal to a huge sector of the market; but an architecture on which
David Megginson wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
I think that the fix will be simply to force the mouse pointer to be
visible before exiting FlightGear.
This is in CVS now. Could you please test it?
That solves the problem completely. Thank you very much, Erik.
Great!
It wasn't too difficult, since
Martin Spott wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Docs/InstallGuide/html
In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv7474/InstallGuide/html
Modified Files:
getstartch2.html
Log Message:
Reffer to /usr/locla/share/FlightGear now.
You'd better mail such changes to me
Martin Spott wrote:
BTW, I didn't find your change in the current CVS checout of the base
package. Could you tell me the lines you changed ?
The *base* package? I don't think anything changed there (I searched for
/usr/local/lib in all the documents, and if it didn't show up I didn't
change
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering, do others feel that the changes in the last week or
so justify a new release (0.9.5-1)? I have the feeling that it does.
I realize Curtis is busy for the next two weeks so it has to wait some
more, but if this is desired I will hold
Kalle Valo wrote:
Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was wondering, do others feel that the changes in the last week or
so justify a new release (0.9.5-1)?
If you are going to make a new release, just don't name it 0.9.5-1,
please. That would create lots of confusion for both users
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
Modified Files:
options.xml
Log Message:
Remove an obsolete option for airport-id.
Erik, the option require an ICAO id, so I think this is
the right option and find more logical to deprecate
--airport instead.
There should be no difference between
Hi,
I noticed that the fact that scenery loading is faster when pressing 'v'
is caused by the fact that FlightGear doesn't bother rendering the scene
in the mean time.
Maybe it would be a good idea to set /sim/rendering/draw-otw to false
just after the message box is displayed, and setting it
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
It was just a problem of consistency between the name of the option
and what it is really doing and expecting as argument.
I noticed you didn't touch options.cxx yet so both are still valid.
Yep. And I intend to keep it that way for at least a few months more.
--
Searching
Hi,
I was wondering, do others feel that the changes in the last week or so
justify a new release (0.9.5-1)? I have the feeling that it does.
I realize Curtis is busy for the next two weeks so it has to wait some
more, but if this is desired I will hold off any drastic changes to the
code
David Megginson wrote:
I think that the fix will be simply to force the mouse pointer to be
visible before exiting FlightGear.
This is in CVS now. Could you please test it?
Erik
--
Looking for a new Fokker Jetliner?
http://www.rekkof.nl/
___
Peter L wrote:
I wonder what would happen if some unaware pilot cuts the cable of an
actively used cable railway in the Alps because of the lack of
information.
He he...
You mean like the US air force a few years ago?
Was it the USAF? I couldn't remember anymore, just that it happened..
Erik
Matevz Jekovec wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
Hm..., what about the Eiffel tower, Big Ben, English Parlament,
cathedrals, islam churches (sorry, I forgot how they are called :-( )?
Weren't they modeled yet?
There is a generic observatory model, but no database to place them
correctly. The rest
Matevz Jekovec wrote:
Does terrasync download terrain only or scenery objects as well. Because
the current terrasync repository still has the old structure IMO. (I set
the terrasync root dir to fgfs/data/Scenery/Terrain to get it work, but
this doesn't include objects download, as they are in
Vivian Meazza wrote:
Then windsocks and radio towers will magically appear in Europe. Or anyway,
they do for me :-).
Are you sure about the radio towers?
Curtis uses an US only database for that ...
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Erik Hofman -- Thursday 12 August 2004 19:00:
Vivian Meazza wrote:
Then windsocks and radio towers will magically appear in Europe. Or anyway,
they do for me :-).
Are you sure about the radio towers?
Curtis uses an US only database for that ...
He probably means the beacons
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
Ever thought of selling art works that are used in FlightGear at very low
price?
http://www.turbosquid.com/
I don't think that would work because we have to make absolutely sure
that the sold items are used in GPL'ed work only. Most buyers will
assume they own the
David Megginson wrote:
Before I bash Oz any more, I'll repeat the problem that Garmin had with
my own government recently. The Garmin 296 handheld GPS includes
terrain obstructions (such as towers), which could save of lives;
however, the Canadian government refused to provide obstruction
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
Can you provide more explanation?
Most of the textures, models and what's not is released under the terms
of the GPL. Products licensed under the GPL should remain under the GPL
forever (or until the original author authorities the license change).
So if you want to
Chris Metzler wrote:
Hi. I'm just finishing up a set of general-purpose runway length
remaining signs, along with a python script that will insert them into
appropriate .stg files as desired. I used the FAA Advisory Circulars
150/5340-18C (Standards for Airport Sign Systems) and 150/5345-44
Vivian Meazza wrote:
AC3D seems to add the material colour to the texture
No, it's OpenGL that does this. With everything related to modeling you
have to take into account the possibilities and requirements of OpenGL,
and not that of your 3d modeler program.
Erik
Boris Koenig wrote:
Most current images seem really to be mainly computer created, but
check out:
http://www.airbus.com/MultimediaElements/139.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/upload/b/ba/A380.flightdeck.750pix.jpg
What's interesting though, is the integrated Chart-Database with
LCD screens
Boris Koenig wrote:
I'm afraid you're wrong (I was referring to the latter image) - this
seems actually like an airbus version of Jeppensen's electronic
FlightBag - simply not relying on an external notebook anymore, but
rather connected to the systems of the aircraft.
Hmm, it's hard to see, but
Jim Wilson wrote:
Alex,
Those photos are really are nice! Wow! Mind me asking what you took them with?
I like how they modeled them after Frederic's models!
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Wojnaroski wrote:
Looking at the xmlsound structure...
Wondering if it would be useful to extend the structure and methods to add a
second property and then define a set of additonal macro operators to
combine the two properties with an arithmetic/logical operation to produce a
result.
One
Dave Perry wrote:
I am attaching an edit of this file that should work with either Windows
or Linux. As of a few days ago, the CVS file did not work at all.
This has been committed now.
Thanks!
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eric L Hathaway wrote:
Hello all,
The following patch updates the ThrustMaster FCS joystick configuration.
I have Nasal-ized the joystick bindings, drawing ideas from the
Cyborg-Gold-3d-USB configuration file. I also changed some of the
bindings, so the joystick setup is more like the default
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Is there a way to create new instances of AIAircraft or
another kind on the fly, just by adding some nodes in
the property tree, or running a command from the telnet
interface, that is, without modifying the source code ?
Is there something planned in this direction ?
Jon Stockill wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
Jon Stockill wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
My personal opinion would be to get everything at one place,
preferably (but not necessarily) in a separate CVS branch at
flightgear.org just like the world wide scenery right now. That
would be easiest for everybody
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 22:44:19 +0200, Erik wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
Erik
(Ever used the bicycle to cycle up a steep hill?)
..is overhang steep enough? ;-)
(or did you mean hangover ..?)
:-)
On a bicycle?
..yup. Classic case of _find_-a-way and
Chris Metzler wrote:
Fair enough. But with ground structures that are installable separately,
it's possible for a user to pick and choose what to install. For example,
someone could wish to see a set of landmarks in Paris, but not the
buildings at Orly (wanting smoother framerates during
Boris Koenig wrote:
Erik, in order to determine how feasible it would be to even
further extend tardiff.pl in one way or the other it would
be useful to know what _major_ changes to the FlightGear base
package are planned, or at least likely to occur within the
near future, so things like
Boris Koenig wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
The most likely changes are updated (and new) aircraft 3d model
related files. The rest is not very predictable. It comes as things go
It might be useful if such changes could be documented - at least the
more significant ones, do you usually make
Boris Koenig wrote:
weird, this seems to be related to the mailing list application
(pipermail ?) - I did indeed only send the posting to the
devel-list, but it (as well as all replies to it !) shows up
on the users-list as well, seems to be mailheader related,
because it was a reply to another
Martin Spott wrote:
GCC-3.4.1 for Sparc hardware isn't that bad anymore but I'd be still
interested in trying out the commercial compiler by Sun,
For what I've heard gcc is often the better option on Solaris because of
(code) incompatibilities with gcc. I must admit, that was about four
years
Chris Metzler wrote:
I've been waiting to post this until after the release went out, hoping
there'd be more discussion when things were a tiny bit calmer . . .
Over time, various people have done a lot of work on ground structures,
etc., to add to the scenery for FlightGear. Frederic's did a lot
701 - 800 of 2467 matches
Mail list logo
