Hi,
Are there any plans afoot to incorporate a turbine powerplant into Flightgear?
Hopefully, when the English weather co-operates, my baby daughter get's over
her vaccinations and I get chance to go skydiving I'm going to record all
manner of audio samples from the lovely Pratt Whitney in
David,
That is quite impressive!
All done in blender/gimp?
Vertex smoothing and transparent windows would be great...
All the best,
Matt.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah, I haven't yet found a good set of rudder pedals. The
Thrustmaster ones I use are adequate, but have a *lot* of slop in the
center section. Fine control is difficult to impossible. And the
lever arms are just rubbing plastic on plastic, so they're very
sticky.
There's a CH Products
Hello,
Could someone help me out please? - I'm having a trouble compiling after
checking out a copy of CVS today.
I have the correct versions of PLIB, SimGear, and MetaKit installed in
/usr/local/ - pretty much as per the docs. When I cd into
/usr/local/src/FlightGear and run autogen.sh it
Hi all,
I'm thinking of treating myself to CH Products' (http://www.chproducts.com/)
USB Pro Pedals and USB flight Yoke (the one with throttle, mixture, and prop
levers).
Are these supported by Flightgear under Linux and to what level (I expect
that not all the levers work?).
Regards,
..it is also possible to use an how-to on using cvs to minimize the
download requirements, as a bait to fish people into using cvs and
then into development. ;-)
I would love to do some development on FG, but I'm a lowly PHP guy who is
currently wrestling with creating FG models and getting
After many newbie-fied mistakes and misunderstanding I have now setup
/home/cvsroot on my linux box and checked out up-to-date copies of the devel
releases into:
/home/cvsroot/SimGear
/home/cvsroot/FlightGear
/home/cvsroot/fgfsbase
I also have a stable and working FGFS 0.8 which I'd like to
To avoid things getting very complex very quickly it might be easier to take a
very simplistic apporach and model the batteries chief characteristics such
as terminal voltage, and ampere/hour capacity. Since there is no such thing
as a perfect power source you could go to much more detail -
I took it upon myself to email cessna last night in the hope that they might
be able to supply me with some line drawings and a few useful bits of
technical data for the caravan model. I did point out that the info would be
used solely for this project and as such would be re-distributed under
I'm now seeing this when I do a 'cvs update -dP' in the development CVS tree.
cvs server: cannot open directory
/var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/FlightGear/src/Systems/Vacuum: No such file or
directory
cvs server: skipping directory src/Systems/Vacuum
Is this anything I've done locally?
Alex Perry wrote:
Pitot source errors occur mostly
1. In slips, especially in full forward slips
2. At unusual angles of attack, especially no-flap slow flight
IIRC, I read that the EuroFighter uses a system which selects the best source
of data for this stuff taking into account the last
Hi all,
I've been having problems updating Simgear for a few days.
I've tried everything - including moving the lot and starting again but it
continually gets stuck at:
cvs server: Updating src-libs
U src-libs/.cvsignore
U src-libs/Makefile.am
U src-libs/metakit-2.4.3-33.tar.gz
U
Thanks for the help guys!
I always run my CVS updates as root so that didn't appear to be the problem.
The update only completes if I explicitly override my config with -z0 to drop
the compression completely. Hopefully if anyone else is having the same
problem then this might work for you
Hi guys,
I just did a fresh CVS update this evening and I got the following error:
main.cxx: In function `bool fgMainInit(int, char **)':
main.cxx:1608: implicit declaration of function `int
glXGetProcAddressARB(...)'
make[2]: *** [main.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
David Megginson wrote:
Wasn't that a Spitfire and Hurricane base in the Battle of Britain?
At least, its name is ringing bells loud enough to smash my windows.
Yes it was. Actually most of the southern airfields were used by
(mostly) hurricanes and spitfires in the war. They were there to
Well, I said I was going to do it and a freak combination of holiday and nice
weather made me jump in the car and drive to the Sheffield Aero Club far
earlier than planned. After the obligatory cup of tea and handover of £92 I
found myself sat in a C152 by the name of a
On Thursday 03 April 2003 16:16, David Megginson wrote:
Yes, a 150 was simply too small for me -- I paid the extra money to
train in 172s, but I think that our rates are a bit cheaper over here.
Cost-wise it simply isn't an option open to me. Also, I'm not sure but I
think the club reserves
On Thursday 03 April 2003 22:01, David Megginson wrote:
I've simulated soft-field takeoffs on long, paved runways many times,
and used the technique for real a few times this winter to get up
before snow, ice, and slushy puddles in the middle of runway. It
tends to freak out passengers,
Nice to see the 0.92 release made it on to flightsim.com quickly.
Although it's dominated by FS2002, any publicity is good publicity as
they say.
Regards,
Matt.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wow!
Just brings home how small the UK is compared to Canada and the USA.
From my home airfield, 800nm in almost any direction by my reckoning
would land you in another country. Although a C-152 would have ran out
of fuel after 600nm probably. Did you see much variation in weather
over the
I have a couple of questions:
I've been trawling through code to check the possibility of porting the
cool 3-D clouds to native FGFS/PLIB format. As a beginner to C++ this is
probably not the best place to start! Is it worth me doing a tutorial
or whatever from the PLIB site? If so which one(s)?
I'm glad it's not just me, then! I'm struggling with a *very*
simplified C152!
Cheers,
Matt.
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 04:36, Jim Wilson wrote:
Don't be embarassed. If it'll make you feel better I'll share with you some
earliest screenshots of my 747 :-) Don't hesitate to post pics with
Maybe I'm misunderstanding this, but shouldn't windsock placement be
automatic and defined from the airport scenery?
Cheers,
Matt.
Copy the XML file as well, and use windsock.xml after OBJECT_STATIC --
that way it will be animated.
All the best,
David
Is someone undertaking the mamoth task of adding to and correcting
Robin's data for the purposes of FlightGear or do we depend upon him for
updates to it?
Cheers,
Matt.
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 12:52, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Matthew Law -- Friday 20 June 2003 13:44:
Maybe I'm misunderstanding
Congratulations!
I'm sure the rest of the training will be over in no time and it's good to
hear that FG is proving helpful. I'm intending on investing in a yoke and
pedals over winter when the weather robs me of some regular training and I've
already noticed the realism of the flight models
If ther eis a switch for CHT .. would this be so you can manually
adjust the
temp if needed?
No. Cylinder Head Temp is usually used to help you assess the health of
your engine. If it is running too hot it is likely to shorten the life
of the engine. If it is running really hot then it's
Agreed - Initial attempts at using it left me wondering what sort of
substances the people who designed the UI were abusing, but once you get
the hang of it it's rather productive.
I'm just trying to get my head around the UV editor now.
Can you guys recommend any tutorial resources for the
I'll try to keep this short since it is OT but...
I did my first solo this evening after almost 13hrs.
After a few touch and go's and practice forced landings he asked me to come
to a full stop and said I'm fed-up of flying with you so I'm going to sit
in the tower for your last circuit. I
David Megginson wrote:
I'm curious -- your airport is a very short grass strip, but it has a
control tower?
Yes, but is still a Radio only airfield with no ATC. The tower is a small
affair that I'm sure isn't capable of observing the entire circuit since it's
800ft AAL and downwind extends
Alex Perry wrote:
Congratulations. What are you training in ?
Thanks! Mostly 152's but I've done a couple hours in a 150 too.
From: David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For me, the first solo cross-country was the best part of training.
First solo was an important moment, of course, but it
There has been some chat of late about shadows. I don't really understand the
issues reagarding shadows in flightgear/plib. Can anyone briefly let me in
on why they are so difficult and what are the issues with implementing them
in FlightGear?
Also, what are people's views on having a GPS
I thought I'd share this with the list since to replicate it in FGFS would be
very cool for training purposes!
I experienced my first bout of real fear yesterday doing my second hour of
solo circuits. I was operating from 06/24 and after a precautionary couple
of circuits with my instructor
C-152
Pilatus Turbo Porter
C-208 Grand Caravan
Maule MX-7
None of which are in a demonstrable state, but I hope to publish the 152 and
Porter by the end of the year.
Cheers,
Matt.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am I correct when I say :
Slat are in front of the wing,
Yes, but they can be on the trailing edge where the terms 'slat' and
'slot' can be used interchangeably. Generally in the UK they refer to
them as 'leading edge slats'. Most modern aircraft include the 'slots'
within the flap design
Yes, towards the end of February we are expecting a little bundle of
joy. :-)
We are expecting our second child on April 30th. I share your thoughts
too, Curt!
Best wishes,
Matt.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've dabbled with a couple of model helicopters, owned a couple of model
heli sims and flown an R22 for 15 minutes.
A better description for the un-initiated would be 'like juggling water
with forks' IMO. Far more difficult than a C152 ;-)
Cheers,
Matt.
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 12:44, Richard
Congratulations, Lee! Will you be carrying on and getting a glider license?
Turbulence sucks: when I'm flying, I usually try to climb out above
it. Turbulence often means thermals and updrafts, though, so I
imagine that soaring types actually go looking for it. The gusts
disappear usually a few
Given the difficulty of getting in and out of a 152 on the ground it's
probably impossible at our circuit height of 800ft to survive a bailout.
A larger aircraft at 1000ft and reasonable speed, say 100kts, would be
quite survivable. The key is the airspeed. You'd get a far faster
deployment at
On 07:50 Thu 27 Nov , Martin Spott wrote:
The first is correct, the latter is not (see above). Pilots love this
helicopter because of his outstanding manouverability. It's even
capable of doing serious aerobatic - up to inverted flying (AFAIR with
a modified gear box lubrication),
Check
On 10:47 Thu 27 Nov , Erik Hofman wrote:
Yeah, but then you'd get a fight over which flag is put in first and
which flag is shows just for 0.1 usec (e.g. the last flag) ...
Erik
Maybe randomise the order ?
All the best,
Matt
___
On 14:48 Thu 27 Nov , Jon Stockill wrote:
I remember seeing the army display team at RAF Waddington a couple of
years ago - 4 gazelle 1 lynx all lined up in the hover, then the lynx
pilot backflipped the aircraft out of the lineup. The first time you see
it you really can't believe what
On 18:49 Tue 25 Nov , Erik Hofman wrote:
So 75x75 textures of these types of surfaces are required, then? I might
have a go at these during my attempts at modelling EGNF. Are there any
restrictions to the making of textures that I need to be aware of oether
than size and color depth?
One of the problems with these type of photographs is the fact that they
cover a very small area. When using these for textures you would end up
with a hight degree of very annoying repetitiveness.
Another problem is the fact that they aren't shot straight down, making
the textures look
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 17:46, Julian Foad wrote:
Matthew Law wrote:
Speaking of which, would it be possible to change the texture above a
certain height AGL? We could have a texture with more detail for low
altitudes and a shinier, more gaussian texture for higher altitudes...
Just
On 09:56 Tue 02 Dec , Curtis L. Olson wrote:
This is something that has been considered, but it will be a massive
amount of work to do this and preserve all the existing functionality.
Massive might be slightly overstated, but it probably means tearing
everything down and rebuilding it
On 22:13 Tue 02 Dec , David Culp wrote:
I brought my son to work for a day, and he had a wonderful time.
http://home.comcast.net/~davidculp2/kidsday.jpg
At least he didn't have to hold on for much longer :)
All the best,
Matt
___
On 18:08 Fri 05 Dec , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a Geforce 4 Ti 4200 and this card works perfectly with flightgear under
Linux.
Me too. Using the latest drivers i still see the sky flash from blue to black
occasionally...
All the best,
Matt
On 14:53 Tue 16 Dec , Erik Hofman wrote:
Kool Sites are informative, weird, stylish, offbeat or unique
So, what exactly is the FlightGear site?
I'd go for Informative, stylish, and unique ;-)
All the best,
Matt
___
Flightgear-devel mailing
On 12:42 Thu 18 Dec , Alan King wrote:
Rudder pedals. Been a while since I was at the controls in a Cessna
etc, how much control throw is normal? With a one foot seperation
between the pedals 4 seems like a lot, maybe too much. Currently have
2 in and 2 out for the 4 total, but can
On 14:52 Thu 18 Dec , Alan King wrote:
Also I'm assuming the yoke on most planes has a bit more throw than
+-2, but that's about the limit of what's practical with my current
hardware so it'll probably do ok. I could get 6 travel or so max, just
gets a bit more trouble to do.
It's
On 00:42 Fri 19 Dec , Matthew Law wrote:
What are the fields? I'm guessing at some here:
Sorry. I just found the doc on the FGFS site. I've got to start RTFMing more often :-)
All the best,
Matt
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED
To my detriment I haven't been following past discussions on scenery editing. I would
like to add the missing 18/36 runway to EGNF. I have gunzipped the runways.dat file
and found the following line for EGNF:
R EGNF 06 53.316990 -1.196100 60.00 1476 118 NAVNN 00 0
On 02:34 Fri 19 Dec, Ivo wrote:
Also check:
http://baron.flightgear.org/pipermail/flightgear-devel/2003-December/023555.html
After adding the runway manually, you could use TaxiDraw to add the
taxiways.
As for the bug I mentioned in that thread, David Luff sent me a
debug-enabled
How do I export the trim position and IAS to a serial port?
I'd like to use these values to drive some stepper motors which crudely simulate
control load and trim effects.
All the best,
Matt.
---
A merry xmas and a happy new year.
___
On 03:15 Mon 29 Dec , Ivo wrote:
Or we could have multiple people around the world recording the sentences,
so we'll hear the right accent when approaching for example New Delhi or
Mexico City or Frankfurt. Maybe even bilingual, though I don't know if they
use their native language (for
Hi Prabhu,
Please read and digest the docs on the flightgear website and the documentation on
scenery editing at the simgear website (see the link to simgear from the flightgear
site) before getting started. If you still have questions there are plenty here who
will help once you've read the
I agree with you totally. My sentiment was that there have also been many accidents
caused by ATC talking in a foreign language (English) to another pilot who also
doesn't speak English as a first language. The possible problems which can be
introduced by a conversation in effect being
As David said, there is very little adverse yaw from aileron input on modern aircraft
designs. Now, I have no experience of anything but Cessnas but on an A320 for
example, I would be surprised if the aileron input required to perform say, a 20 deg.
bank turn would require *any* rudder input
Curt,
Let me check with the lady first :-)
All the best,
Matt.
On 09:28 Wed 14 Jan , Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FlightGear has been offered free .org booth space and a possible speaker
slot at the Linux User Developer Expo
Hi Curt,
I can be there for one of the days, possibly two if the accomodation isn't
too expensive. I can also bring my PC (17 TFT; Gentoo; Athlon 2500XP;
FGFS CVS and GeForce Ti4200-128 with pedals and joystick), but I'd need
help getting it and me there - I don't want to risk public
That's pretty good scenery! Is that straight from TerraGear or ripped from the MS
Scenery add-ons?
All the best,
Matt.
On 23:31 Wed 28 Jan , Erik Hofman wrote:
But I must also admit that after looking at the new screen shots from
Mat Churchill I might want to change my mind:
html
I'm interested in how you did this as I thought of extracting the files from the MS FS
VFR scenery discs I have and somehow stitching it together for use in FGFS..?
In theory you should be able to get at the data as Reiser should still be able to give
you everything since the last time it wrote
The ones I have are from www.visualflight.co.uk and are about 20GBP per region. I
bought the regions aroung my airfield to help with VFR practice in MSFS but I'd like
to see them in FGFS much more :-) An extension script to rip these into FG for people
who have purchased the images would be
Hi Mally,
I wasn't aware that you were an MSFS developer and since I currently do a bit of
x-country practice in MSFS with the VisualFlight scenery I'd like to congratulate you
on an awesome job!
I for one would be elated to see a commercially available version of the getmapping
derived
BTW, what does the 'S' stand for in 'No SVFR' that's printed next to KSFO
and some other large international airports on the VFR charts?
In the UK it means 'Special VFR' and allows a pilot under VFR and in VMC conditions to
be guided to an airfield which is inside a control zone. You see it
Thanks :-)
I thought it was the hardest of all the exams so far and I just got through with 87.5%
(pass is 75%). Since you are under the JAA you will also have to learn the
semi-pointless and brain numbing Chicago convention stuff too...
I have my Radio Practical exam in a couple of hours :-/
Thankyou all,
I passed btw :-)
All the best,
Matt
On 17:07 Tue 03 Feb , David Luff wrote:
Good Luck!
(Although you probably should have set off by the time this hits your inbox
given the traffic in the UK these days!)
Cheers - Dave
___
Hi Dave,
thanks for the info - I'll mess with the density and see what that yields. Do the AI
aircraft appear at small UK airfields?
I was planning on doing a basic collision detection between the AI aircraft and the
user aircraft. Initially not between AI planes until you were finished
Well Done!
All the best,
Matt.
On 16:11 Wed 04 Feb , Ryan Larson wrote:
I just got back from taking my Commercial Pilot, Airplane Multiengine
Land checkride, and I am happy to say that I passed! Doing a single
engine ILS down to minimums is lots of fun! I took the test in a Piper
Aztec
There's also various scenarios of asymetric thrust - two running engines but one
running roughly or not developing as much power for a plethora of possible reasons.
These incidents have killed many pilots on take off as they think they have plenty of
power, and they do, but the situation
No not yet. I have about 25hrs and need to sit the written exams for Flight Planning,
Nav, Met, Human Factors and Aircraft Technical. I have sat and passed RT written and
Practical and Air Law so far... Hopefully I'll get my PPL sometime later this year but
I'm in no rush really. Also, like
I was sitting my RT Practical. It's a basic test of skill on the radio and ability to
request and act on clearances along a preset route etc. Hence the near failure for
not requesting SVFR into a zone at or before 15miles/5 min.
All the best,
Matt.
On 16:36 Wed 04 Feb , David Megginson
Well, the main difference here is the geography. There aren't many flights (possibly
non!) that I could do from my base airfield where a single leg of 300 miles would
leave me still in the UK. I _will_ be going to France and the Netherlands but it's
extra expense and hassle that I don't want
I'm going to have a look at the Air Navigation Order to check the accuracy of my
original post. As far as I know, without a IMC or IR a PPl is not permitted into the
kind of airspace which would be home to a airport the size of KSFO regardless of the
ceiling etc. SVFR does partially waive some
Straight out of the manual:
---
Special VFR allows the relaxation by ATC, in certain circumstances, of some
restrictions to facilitate the operation of a flight without lowering the flight
safety to an unacceptable level. SVFR is usually applied by ATC in Class D or E
Control Zones, when
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:55:40 -0600, Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi, quick announcement ... baby! Amelia Esther, 8lbs 1oz, born 6:12am
this morning, less than 1 hour from first contraction to delivery. 12
minutes from arrival at the hospital to delivery. Everyone is doing
good.
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:31:30 -0600, Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This month's edition of PC Pilot (http://www.pcpilot.net) has a nice 6
page review of FlightGear. They include tons of screen shots and say a
lot of nice things. I *think* you can find PC Pilot in large bookstores
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 18:53:34 -0500, David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It varies with throttle and mixture. At 75% power, mine indicates about
5 psi running lean of peak or about 7 psi running rich of peak. I don't
remember what it indicates in a full-rich, full-power climb.
Is it usual
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 11:29:38 -, Vivian Meazza
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for that pointer. Unfortunately, it's the wrong Mark - IX I think
from the canon armament, although some real expert will undoubtedly
identify
it instantly, and, more importantly, it doesn't show the underwing
On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 21:52:04 -0500, David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And psychological warfare. From what I've read, the German flight crews
were much more frightened of the Spitfires (and British RADAR guidance
for interceptions made it look like there were many more planes than the
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 20:57:20 +, David Luff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
millibars or inches?
Can FG be set up to use millibars/Hecto Pascals for the Altimeter pressure
setting and imperial for the rest of the units as we use in the UK?
All the best,
Matt.
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 18:07:34 -0500, David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a (relatively) simple matter to make instruments calibrated in
millibars instead of inches of mercury; localizing dialog boxes will be
a bit trickier, though.
In general, I think that our policy should be to
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 22:19:52 +, David Luff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
eg
one-zero-one-three-decimal-two
You can probably drop the decimal point for millibars.
This makes UK flying a lot more realistic now. Thanks :-)
All the best,
Matt
___
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:17:20 -0600, Jon Berndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had the impression that AC3D was a free program, but after visiting
their
site I seem to be mistaken. True?
Jon
Some of the older non-Linux and non-win versions are free I believe.
All the best,
Matt
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 10:17:00 -, Vivian Meazza
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do we handle fuel in lbs and account for Avgas/JP4?
Avgas and Jet A1 have different specific gravities. I can't remember what
the Sp.G of Jet A1 is but Avgas here is quoted as 0.7 - i.e. (0.7 x The
equivalent
I'm not getting any response for simgear.org or cvs.simgear.org. Is
anyone else having this problem?
All the best,
Matt.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Style sheet?
tried something like img name=foo src=/images/foo.jpg border=0 ?
All the best,
Matt.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Jon S Berndt wrote:
No, I don't think so, because the previous version worked. To be more
descriptive, I am redesigning the left hand side panel at the JSBSim
web site, because we have a different set of pages now in-place than
before, and because all the items were not previously viewable.
Lee Elliott wrote:
It sounds as though things went really well - round of applause to all
concerned. I wish I could have got up there, if only to visit but sadly,
there wasn't any way I could make it.
Ditto. I'll definitely try and be there next year.
Well done guys!
All the best,
Matt.
I'm about to start writing something in C to calculate the heading
required to maintain a track and the resultant ground speed given a wind
vector. This is destined to be a simple flight planner for my Palm but
I'd like to make an interface to FG so that in theory you could save a
real flight
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..be adviced the guys here torched me for suggesting redoing FG in C,
so I guess you by C really meant C++, no? ;-)
No I really did mean C :-) I'm not suggesting redoing anything, just
writing an app which may be useful to real pilots and FG pilots too.
AFAIK (and I
The new UK CAA charts are coming out so I currently have last years
1:500,000 Southern England/Wales/NW France chart up for grabs. Shortly
to be followed by the Northern England/Scotland chart. I'll give these
away free to anyone here who is willing to cover the postage whether you
are
Vivian Meazza wrote:
I think I would expect an engine running out of fuel to rapidly lose power
and wind down, not stop abruptly as it would if you opened the magneto
switches. I have to say that is based on motor racing rather than aviation
experience. Haven't tried it while airborne, and intend
Boris Koenig wrote:
wow, I am just about to notice how much work some people spend on really
resembling all the various aircraft subtleties properly ... didn't know
that so far, would definitely recommend to create some kind of summary
for each aircraft and place it as a textfile into each
David Megginson wrote:
I don't think we should disable any systems, period, but we can put
users by default in situations where carb icing is unlikely (i.e. a
clear, dry day). Once you get into situations where carb icing is
likely, users are going to be dealing with other problems like
David Megginson wrote:
I don't think we should disable any systems, period, but we can put
users by default in situations where carb icing is unlikely (i.e. a
clear, dry day). Once you get into situations where carb icing is
likely, users are going to be dealing with other problems like
David Megginson wrote:
Alex Perry wrote:
That's a point. Once the engine stutters/quits due to carb ice,
you have to make it take a while for the ice to go away again.
... and it takes quite a while ...
Once the engine quits, it's too late for carb heat, isn't it? If it's
only a partial
David Megginson wrote:
I've been frustrated with the tendency of the DC-3 (--aircraft=dc3) to
noseover during the takeoff and landing rolls, and of the J3 Cub
(--aircraft=j3cub) to nose over during wheel landings. I've fiddled
with the YASim files a lot in the past but have never found a good
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:09:24 +0100, Matthew wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think my Vans RV-9 will have a diesel engine :-)
..you have a kit started? Which diesel?
Arnt,
I'm sending a reply off-list to prevent me getting seriously off-topic :-)
All the best,
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:09:24 +0100, Matthew wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think my Vans RV-9 will have a diesel engine :-)
..you have a kit started? Which diesel?
Arnt,
I'm sending a reply off-list to prevent me getting seriously off-topic :-)
All the best,
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
