On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:32:31 pm Matthew Corrie Wade wrote:
Hello. I would like to be able to use Gimp to alter
designs for commercial use - is this allowed?
I several others in Australia use GIMP for this
have never run into a problem.
Unlike certain other commercial enterprises, Open
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 06:04:57 am Branko Vukelic wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, Philip Rhoades wrote:
What is going on with these size increases?
It may be that after rotation, pixels that were
otherwise the same color got anti-aliased and were
slightly different color. This would increase the
image
On Tuesday 09 June 2009 18:56:04 Theo M wrote:
was under the impression that the I could delete
to transparency, and despite my best efforts I
could not get it work.
If you imported the image or layer from a JPeG (.jpg)
file, it will not have an alpha property for that layer.
Use menu: Layer
On Monday 01 June 2009 23:57:48 Cilengir, Erika wrote:
Is GIMP available for commercial use?
Erika, GIMP is available for practically any use. Free
as in $.
Unlike (for example) PhotoShop, you can change GIMP if
you like so that it looks or acts more usefully for your
purposes. Free as in not
On Monday 27 April 2009 08:11:14 Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
For me at the moment, this is an inconvenience, as I've
a choice of a couple of applications in which I can
enter a desired text, and export a graphic selection
containing the necessary text, but at minimum we have
here of an
On Mon, 5 May 2008, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
Try installing the packages gimp-devel
Done.
and ruby-devel,
Already in.
downlaod
gimp-ruby source (for example with:
svn co http://svn.gnome.org/svn/gimp-ruby/trunk gimp-ruby
Err... first urpmi subversion (is on CD3 of
2008.0 install set).
On Sun, 4 May 2008, Xavier Mas wrote:
Thank you js.
Being useful seems to be a long-term habit for
Joao. I don't think that it's just because
he's Brasiliano, either. (-:
Being weird seems to be a habit for me: I'd
like to script GIMP in Ruby instead.
Cheers; Leon
--
On Sun, 4 May 2008, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
Good morning, South America! (-:
Just cehck the apropriate package (probably
named gimp-ruby) from your distro
Mandriva 2008.0 on this laptop, about to be
2008.1 AKA spring.
Has perl-Gimp gimp-python but nothing to
do with Ruby on GIMP (but there
I walked a lady through GIMP on Windows 2000 today, she was
delighted with it.
A feature that she particularly liked was being able to
select things (wand, oval, block, whatever) then feather
the selection so whatever you did had no sharp edges.
She also liked being able to select with the
On Thursday 15 November 2007 04:29:00 Akkana Peck wrote:
But there's a solution for your friend in the meantime: the
Quickmask. Click on that inconspicuous little square down
at the bottom left of the image window, in the corner
between the scrollbar and the ruler. That switches to
Quickmask
On Saturday 03 November 2007 22:31:44 carol irvin wrote:
how many people here are on dialup?
Me. Mostly due to lack of alternatives.
If either the Government or an ISP or both gets an act, we can
eventually get a 512kb satellite connection for about AUD$45
a month. Plus ghasp dollars per
On Tuesday 30 October 2007 02:26:29 John Culleton wrote:
All that was released today was the source code. Binaries
for various platforms will come later.
I use 2.4rc3 on my slackware Linux system. Is this the same
as the final release? It seems to work fine.
I tried 2.4-for-real for Win32
On Friday 26 October 2007 19:03:36 Jeffery Small wrote:
Does the new release include up-to-date documentation on new
features like the healing and perspective cloning tools?
Can't recall having seen the docs but these features did do stuff
when I whipped the Win32 edition into life this
On Thursday 25 October 2007 23:18:04 norman wrote:
I would like to be able to produce a black and white negative
image from an ordinary colour image.
I'm lazy, so desaturating on luminosity works well enough for
me. If I wanted to alter the colours, I'd put the image through
a colour-map first.
On Saturday 20 October 2007 18:34:49 norman wrote:
I have just looked at the Ubuntu 7.10 'try it first disc' and
Gimp 2.4rc3 was on it.
I've finally got that installed on Feisty. I started too soon, as
Richard Hirner (thanks!) sent me a link for a native Feisty
package after I'd got all of the
On Saturday 20 October 2007 20:59:15 Leon Brooks GIMP wrote:
It's taken 49 package updates
Correction, 79 packages including a couple of _games_ I had
to update to track changes in font-names used in a GIMP
dependency.
Cheers; Leon
___
Gimp-user
On Saturday 20 October 2007 20:59:15 Leon Brooks GIMP wrote:
I'll let you know soonish how it actually runs.
This RAM-limited Celeron 566 makes it run kind of slowly, but
it does run reliably some of the newer tools are enjoyable.
A friend from the other side of Oz will be mailing me a set
On Friday 19 October 2007 12:08:53 Chris Mohler wrote:
with the ubuntu beta (gutsy)
OBTW, the package list is here:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/gutsy/graphics/gimp
I'm fetching from Pacific, which happens to be in Sydney, near
where this dialup has its POP (although I'm actually in western
On Friday 19 October 2007 12:08:53 Chris Mohler wrote:
I've been messing with the ubuntu beta (gutsy) and it
installed RC3 from the start.
It seems to have enough packages to keep Feisty happy, is
even small enough to download over dialup in an afternoon. I'll
dpkg this shortly. I might get
On Friday 19 October 2007 12:08:53 Chris Mohler wrote:
On 10/18/07, Leon Brooks GIMP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, if anyone sees a real 2.4 DEB or RPM source, please drop
a message on this list saying so. Both I my sister-in-law
photographer would like to graduate from earlyish 2.3s,
I;ve
On Friday 19 October 2007 05:29:49 kerry wrote:
Please could you tell me where I can download the 2.4
for windows in complete package
AFAIK, nowhere. Wait a few days, at worst a week or two for
2.4 to be fully released the Windows packagers to catch up.
BTW, if anyone sees a real 2.4 DEB or
On Thursday 11 October 2007 00:50:09 J Figueroa G - Gmail wrote:
(I dont speak and read english so much)
Don't worry about it (No worries! here in Australia).
I'd just be guessing if I _chose_ your native language as Spanish
or something like it (Casablanca?), would have to patiently
spend
On Friday 05 October 2007 04:21:32 carol irvin wrote:
I've always suspected that this is because art is my escape from reality.
Ah, well, at least you know what that is... that an Open Free
escape is much safer more useful than one of those complex
psycho-whatsisnames. (-:
Cheers; Leon
On Friday 05 October 2007 00:03:14 David Heino wrote:
is 72 dpi still sufficient across all possible monitors--a
little lap top screen to a large screen HDTV?
There ain't no simple answer to that.
A simple laptop screen starts at about 1024x768 pixels (dots)
so a 72DPI picture to cover that
On Friday 05 October 2007 00:22:59 carol irvin wrote:
http://en.flossmanuals.net/bin/view/Gimp/OptimisingImagesForWeb?
topic=WebHome
http://gimp.org/tutorials/
http://meetthegimp.org/?cat=8
http://www.gimpguru.org/
http://gimp-savvy.com/BOOK/
http://gug.sunsite.dk/
All mookbarked
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 04:35:36 David Southwell wrote:
IMHO photoshop is NOT a tool designed for the average user.
Average can mean typical it can mean numbers (as in
mean/mode/median), either way, PS fits the bill.
So if you want to struggle with an average creativity ceiling
suffer
On Sunday 30 September 2007 03:26:33 carol irvin wrote:
I don't see any reason why I shouldn't be able to do this
completely in Gimp if I set my mind to it. I don't
collaborate with any other artists so it doesn't matter what
I use.
More than that, you have people you can actually ask
On Sunday 30 September 2007 20:10:46 Sven Neumann wrote:
The application can already add bookmarks and GIMP 2.4
already makes use of this feature in some places. I am not
convinced though that this would be a good way to solve the
problems brought up the user who started the thread.
I am
On Sunday 30 September 2007 20:06:09 Sven Neumann wrote:
We are listening to our users. That's why we have this mailing-
list and actually read about the problems and needs of our
users.
Round of applause, that sentiment. (-:
Now I need to organise my own life better so I can make space
to
On Monday 01 October 2007 08:48:09 you wrote:
Each person (who wanted to participate) would take an art
step phase further using GIMP until we had a completed art
work. For example, let's say you'd start it using a brush.
Then maybe I'd go into what you did with an eraser and make
it
On Monday 01 October 2007 08:56:40 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note: author has recently added a note that its not Vista-
ready (and may or may not ever be :-( ). That alone is
sufficient to keep me on WinXp as long as possible.
Or to inspire you to make a really robust portable GTK version
On Monday 01 October 2007 13:57:40 carol irvin wrote:
then i altered that version with a filter. and, drum roll
please, made them into two layers!
Tah-daaah! Round of applause! (-:
Perhaps GIMP can develop some new modes so that future versions
of plugins etc can *optionally* make a new
On Sunday 30 September 2007 01:31:44 carol irvin wrote:
I suspect I need to do something
every time I do a paste that converts the paste into its own layer.
Yah, New Layer.
I'm sure that there's a keyboard shortcut for that, but the GIMP
(along with a few other apps) is broken on this antique
On Saturday 29 September 2007 01:51:59 carol irvin wrote:
I am switching myself to open source programs whenever I
can to save money. It is no more complex than that.
Hi Carol!
Um, I convert people to OpenOffice who basically don't give a
hoot about the $$$. They adopt it because:
* They
On Friday 28 September 2007 01:00:45 George Farris wrote:
If you can provide hard data that backs this up with numbers
Unfortunately, this is the Real World(tm), rejection can be
as simple as it looks too different.
However, I would be interested in hard numbers too.
Cheers; Leon
On Friday 28 September 2007 02:37:14 Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
Unfortunatelly all articles are in Brazillian Portuguese only.
Yeah? I do like it when I'm able to read something in languages
other than English. BrazPort is something I could at best blunder
my way through, but it usually
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 10:17:50 jim feldman wrote:
Even with it's bit depth shortcoming, I'd still take GIMP's
mature tool set over anything OTHER than PS CS2/3 (at a
mere $649US)
Approximating the $USD-$AUD conversions (http://www.xe.com/ucc/),
that's AUD$743, about the cost of a
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 02:34:13 Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
Do I still have the old version?
[...]
Do I have both versions so I need to make GIMP use the new
one rather than the old one?
Maybe. Try ldd $(which gimp) see what it says.
On this system (updated Ubuntu Fiesty) gimp is in
On Thursday 27 September 2007 03:49:25 Sven Neumann wrote:
Do you even know what you are talking about? I don't think so.
Oh. Someone seems to have put Sven into Happy Mode. (-:
I must say that as a programming novitiate, sorta, I do find
the open to- fro-ing on lists like GIMP's very
On Thursday 13 September 2007 17:58:02 norman wrote:
This is very much due to a video course I am following on
www.meetthegimp.org which, in my opinion, is a great place
to start for the amateur photographer.
Hello from sunny Tullah, Tasmania, where dialup is the peak of
modern Internet
On Thursday 13 September 2007 20:25:33 you wrote:
To set in turn of cost: Sony Alpha 700 (1400 USD),
Canon 40D (1500+ USD), Nikon D300 (1800+ USD).
Thaks for that nice, simple list.
I got good value out of a Sony DSC-F707 until the day I
ran it over with my 2t van.
Several of the pro
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 09:19, Owen wrote:
2. Do you really need to make cmyk plates?
Printing companies do, yes.
Cheers; Leon
--
http://cyberknights.com.au/ Modern tools; traditional dedication
http://www.taslug.org.au/ Member, Tasmania Linux User Group
http://slpwa.asn.au/
On Saturday 04 August 2007, Niels Larsen wrote:
The address is http://www.minihowto.org
Good idea, trying that, it seems to have an odd sort of
rate-limiting thingy which let me grab over 100k in my
first run, then lets about 8-24k go in a bunch each retry.
This is over a dial-up modem, so I'm
On Saturday 04 August 2007, Niels Larsen wrote:
A small beginners minihowto about gimp is made.
Got it, many retries later. Looks good, about 4% text the
rest JPEGs. Will post a more detailed comment after having
walked through it. Hello from Tasmania, under the East end
of Australia.
Cheers;
On Thursday 12 July 2007, Manish Singh wrote:
Why is this our problem?
Our list our community is being distracted by it. That gives
us a facet of the problem. We can reduce that facet by simply
saying That's a GimpShop problem, please take it http://here/;
in response.
Hopefully, this will
On Thursday 12 July 2007, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
You will also find many little things that have been improved
to guide the user along the way, such as tooltips for all menu
items (quick description of what each filter does) or status
bar messages that help you to remember how to use each tool
On Thursday 12 July 2007, Manish Singh wrote:
The GPL allows forks, but doesn't require the organization
that was forked from to provide support to the fork.
True. However, I'm wondering if there's anyone here willing to
moderate such a list, what it would coist to run such at
Berkeley?
The
On Monday 09 July 2007, Sven Neumann wrote:
I just tried to help you by pointing out that gimpshop is a
different application and that you should try to get support
for it from the people who did the fork. If you did that you
might have found out that there is no such support. You might
then
On Monday 09 July 2007, David Southwell wrote:
A gui that emulates photoshop is really needed.
If it were done as a wrapper idea over standard GIMP, and
integrated, I could easily agree with that. Much better again
if it were modular, so you could enable and disable PS-ish
chunks.
The current
On Monday 09 July 2007, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
I have updated this wiki page
Excellent! Thank you!
I have also added a short description of some technical
problems related to the fork (code conflicts, breaking
translations) and again, this section can be expanded
if anybody feels like
On Thursday 21 June 2007, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Sounds like the article uses Cinepaint propaganda without original
research.
You could be right on the money.
It's typical (speaking from experience here) for magazine article
authors to be under time pressure, so they don't always feel free
John Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carter castor wrote:
This goes right to the heart of my biggest complaint about GIMP
though: its name. I don't understand why the developers would
put so much time and hard work into creating a program as
professional as GIMP and then name it after a slang
Anthony Ettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may have a point given 2 software boxes on a shelf,
Photoshop is more descriptive than Gimp - But that
isn't how people acquire Gimp.
Today.
What about in 3 years' time?
Cheers; Leon
___
Gimp-user
Has anyone read /GIMP 2 for Photographers/ yet?
There's a review up at:
http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS5105451578.html
I'd value your opinion, if you've formed one. Particularly if you're
a photographer of any sort.
Cheers; Leon
___
54 matches
Mail list logo
