On 06/04/2011 06:14 AM, Ofnuts wrote:
On 06/04/2011 02:01 AM, MM wrote:
I am not an expert, however I like to play with panoramas etcetera.
I use Gimp to retouch them once completed and I was looking for the
possibility of use a watermark copyright on those photos before
publishing them on
Hi! Sometime last year, I used a Gimp 2.6 plugin which took an image
and put vertical photo sprockets on the left and right sides of the
image, with the text 1A printed on it. This plugin was similar to the
filmstrip plugin except the filmstrip plugin puts the photo sprockets
on the top and
On 03/15/2011 05:18 PM, Carol Spears wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:10:32AM -0700, Tom Williams wrote:
Hi! Sometime last year, I used a Gimp 2.6 plugin which took an image
and put vertical photo sprockets on the left and right sides of the
image, with the text 1A printed
On 11/05/2010 03:11 PM, redforce wrote:
Indeed. Please file a bug-report at Ubuntu. We explicitly released a
fixed version (2.6.11) before the Ubuntu release. The Ubuntu maintainers
should do their users a favor and update to that release.
Seems that this has been reported:
On 10/31/2010 05:11 PM, geoffrey wrote:
I just installed gimp with Ubuntu 10.10. Simple problem. Any way I try to
print, the printer produces a blank sheet of paper. HPDeskJetPro prints any
other program's output. It seems that the package on Ubuntu gets the 2,6.10
with the cairo software
On 05/27/2010 12:51 PM, Sebastian Tennant wrote:
Quoth Frank Gore g...@friendlyphotozone.com:
There's more to it than just the PNG format, and this isn't really a Gimp
thing:
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/bobosola/
Many thanks to all respondents.
It turns out there are two kinds
On 05/27/2010 01:47 PM, Stefan Maerz wrote:
On 5/27/2010 3:38 PM, Tom Williams wrote:
Can't doing this result in some loss of image quality? Sometimes I'll
make PNGs with a drop shadow and transparency and when I convert the
image to indexed mode, the drop shadow quality suffers.
Peace
On 05/27/2010 02:00 PM, niski wrote:
W dniu 2010-05-27 22:38, Tom Williams pisze:
On 05/27/2010 12:51 PM, Sebastian Tennant wrote:
Quoth Frank Goreg...@friendlyphotozone.com:
There's more to it than just the PNG format, and this isn't really
a Gimp
thing:
http
On 05/27/2010 03:03 PM, Branko Vukelic wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Tom Williams tomd...@comcast.net wrote:
Can't doing this result in some loss of image quality? Sometimes I'll
make PNGs with a drop shadow and transparency and when I convert the
image to indexed mode
On 05/27/2010 02:56 PM, Frank Gore wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Tom Williams tomd...@comcast.net wrote:
Can't doing this result in some loss of image quality? Sometimes I'll
make PNGs with a drop shadow and transparency and when I convert the
image to indexed mode, the drop
Frank Gore wrote:
Sorry, those were links to the version of the pictures as displayed by
Picasa, which has the metadata stripped. The direct download links are
as follows:
Adobe RGB:
http://lh6.ggpht.com/_HAZjMzZWrtc/S05qkb7KkYI/BCw/oPJ80XXYH-Y/d/_GOR3359.JPG
sRGB:
Ken Warner wrote:
Do all GIMP for Mac builds need X11?
I believe so. Based on these two pages, X11 is a requirement for Gimp
to run on Mac OS X:
http://www.gimp.org/macintosh/ (scroll to bottom of page)
http://gimp.lisanet.de/Website/Download.html
Peace...
Tom
Tom Williams wrote:
Rob
be closed as well. I understand why
that's the case but it's a minor issue I have with it. :)
Good luck!
Peace...
Tom
Tom Williams wrote:
Ken Warner wrote:
Do all GIMP for Mac builds need X11?
I believe so. Based on these two pages, X11 is a requirement for Gimp
to run on Mac OS X:
http
Rob Meurer wrote:
I just got GIMP for Mac and in installing it says no because I need
X-11. What is that?
The X Window System server for Mac OS X:
http://support.apple.com/downloads/X11_for_Mac_OS_X_1_0
You should be able to install X from your Mac OS X install DVD.
Peace...
Tom
DJ wrote:
Hi,
RP check this:
RP http://www.gimp.org/tutorials/Creating_Icons/
RP Greetings from Belgrade, Serbia
Thank you.
I was going through the tutorial and tried the antialiasing. I took a
fuzzy circle brush #5 and changed the opacity to 40. The first time I
tried it, I clicked and
I'm running Gimp 2.6.1 on Ubuntu 8.10 (64-bit) and I've noticed when I
load an image, the image window stays behind the toolbox and the layers
window all the time. I didn't see a preference where I could control
always on top behavior.
This makes it challenging for me to work with images.
Is
Nathan Lane wrote:
Go to Edit Preferences, select Window Management, change the Hints
for the Toolbox and Docks to Normal Window.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Tom Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running Gimp 2.6.1 on Ubuntu 8.10 (64-bit) and I've
Martin Nordholts wrote:
Nathan Lane wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Tom Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running Gimp 2.6.1 on Ubuntu 8.10 (64-bit) and I've noticed when I
load an image, the image window stays behind the toolbox
Elwin Estle wrote:
I am attempting to compile 2.4 on a fresh Slackware 12.0 install. When I run
./configure, I get a message at the end about needing pygtk, but I have pygtk
installed
and the version number is high enough. Do I need some kind of development
headers and if
so, where do I
Looks like libssl is missing on your system:
cannot find -lssl
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[4]: *** [libprintbackend-cups.la] Erreur 1
Peace...
Tom
julien wrote:
Thank you Ulf,
cups-devel, findutils-locate and pin now installed.
But still a problem with something missing
I'm posting this question here to see if it's a Python environment issue
on my end or something in Gimp 2.3.15. I'm building Gimp 2.3.15 from
source on a freshly re-installed Ubuntu 6.10 (AMD64) Linux system. Here
is my build environment information:
gcc-4.1.2 20060928 (prerelease)
2.6.17
Yep, I hit that as well. I'm running Ubuntu 6.10 (Edgy Eft) and I
solved that problem by upgrading dbus to version 1.0.2. That allowed
me to compile Gimp 2.3.14 but it basically broke several other parts of
the Ubuntu distribution.
HAL won't run.
Nautilus won't run.
Until Ubuntu catches up with
Brendan wrote:
On Monday 18 December 2006 19:52, lists wrote:
Carter castor wrote:
This goes right to the heart of my biggest complaint about GIMP
though: its name. I don't understand why the developers would put so
much time and hard work into creating a program as professional as
David Gowers wrote:
On 12/18/06, *Leon Brooks* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anthony Ettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You may have a point given 2 software boxes on a shelf,
Photoshop is more descriptive than Gimp - But that
Stephan Hegel wrote:
Tom Williams wrote:
For the record folks, I've got Gimp 2.2.11 installed in /usr (came with
my Linux distro) and Gimp 2.3.12 (used to have 2.3.11) installed in
/usr/local/gimp-2.3 and I'm able to run either version without any
problems, errors, or wrapper scripts
Toby Haynes wrote:
Tom Williams wrote:
---START-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ file /usr/bin/gimp
/usr/bin/gimp: symbolic link to `gimp-2.2'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ file /usr/bin/gimp-2.2
/usr/bin/gimp-2.2: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64, version 1
(SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.0
Stephan Hegel wrote:
Tom Williams wrote:
Sure can. :)
START-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
Thanks, Tom. The point is the empty LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable.
IIUC, in this case the loader is not forced to search for libs in
certain
For the record folks, I've got Gimp 2.2.11 installed in /usr (came with
my Linux distro) and Gimp 2.3.12 (used to have 2.3.11) installed in
/usr/local/gimp-2.3 and I'm able to run either version without any
problems, errors, or wrapper scripts (unless gimp-2.3 is a wrapper script).
I'm
I see that Gimp 2.3.12 has just been released and I was wondering what
are the chances of getting the EXIF browser plugin incorporated as a
plugin that's part of the Gimp distribution?
EXIF browser:
http://registry.gimp.org/plugin?id=4153
Thanks!
Peace...
Tom
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 2006-10-15 at 00:05 -0700, Tom Williams wrote:
I see that Gimp 2.3.12 has just been released and I was wondering what
are the chances of getting the EXIF browser plugin incorporated as a
plugin that's part of the Gimp distribution?
The plan
Carol Spears wrote:
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 04:57:26PM -0700, Tom Williams wrote:
Anywho, when I do an auto levels adjustment on the photo, the result
looks quite a bit different and not as good as the original. I'm
wondering if the result is actually correct or not.
i do not know
Is the SIOX tool still part of Gimp 2.3? I didn't see the icon for it
in the toolbox in 2.3.10.
Thanks!
Peace...
Tom
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Carol Spears wrote:
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 10:50:46AM -0700, Tom Williams wrote:
Is the SIOX tool still part of Gimp 2.3? I didn't see the icon for it
in the toolbox in 2.3.10.
it is still there.
i wrote a little thingie about how clever (in my opinion) the default
layout
Hi! I took a photo using a Canon PowerShot A75 while driving at approx
65 mph. The shot came out ok and I didn't get into an accident. :)
Anywho, when I do an auto levels adjustment on the photo, the result
looks quite a bit different and not as good as the original. I'm
wondering if the
I have a JPEG that's 846x648 in dimensions taken by a digital camera.
The image is rather dark and I'm wanting to lighten up it and enhance it
a bit. I've used the Levels and Curves filters to adjust colors and
lighten the image but the results aren't turning out as well as I would
like.
Stephen Norris wrote:
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 20:55 -0700, Tom Williams wrote:
I have a JPEG that's 846x648 in dimensions taken by a digital camera.
The image is rather dark and I'm wanting to lighten up it and enhance it
a bit. I've used the Levels and Curves filters to adjust colors
Shlomi Fish wrote:
On Saturday 06 May 2006 05:55, Tom Williams wrote:
Hi! I'm installing Gimp 2.2.11 on my newly rebuilding Slackware Linux
system and I've installed Gtk+ 2.8.17 but not Gtk 1.2.10. I tried to
install Gtk-Perl via CPAN and the configuration of Gtk-Perl failed due
to gtk
Hi! I'm installing Gimp 2.2.11 on my newly rebuilding Slackware Linux
system and I've installed Gtk+ 2.8.17 but not Gtk 1.2.10. I tried to
install Gtk-Perl via CPAN and the configuration of Gtk-Perl failed due
to gtk-config not being found.
Will Gtk-Perl be updated to work with GTK+ 2.x?
Hi! I'm looking for a plugin to add support for Kodak Photo CD (.PCD)
files and I'm not having any luck.
What are my options for getting Photo CD image support in Gimp 2.2 or 2.4?
Thanks!
Peace...
Tom
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Michael Schumacher wrote:
Well, it shows that the author doesn't read the OpenUsability forum. Of
course, this makes it a suitable article for NewsForged, but without
proof for the authors claims it is worthless.
I don't dispute this, but I think a more fundamental issue has been
raised in
Ross Brown wrote:
Afternoon All
A newbie to Gimp but wanted to give it a go as I'd heard so many good
things about it.
Found a basic problem that could stop me using it - but I'm sure it's
solvable.
I'm running Gimp through X11 on a Mac (running OSX 10.4.5).
I keep all my work on a
Ross Brown wrote:
If Gimp is to become a replacement for Photoshop then, whether it
appears to be good practice or not, it has to accommodate its
potential users and work as they are used to working (in the short
term at least). I'm sure there are many people who will argue - and
possible
Paul Bloch wrote:
To take an example that would also apply to Gimp, when showing us
different methods she came across a tool that didn't allow you to
preview the effect and she simply said,This is pretty useless, you
can't see what you're doing. So there is a functional and productive
Bram Kuijper wrote:
Sure? Again, doesn't it say something about general usability of
GIMP's GUI? A good GUI is characterized that it is 'understandable' by
the great majority of users, inexperienced, experienced using other
software platforms and experienced using GIMP. I work with GIMP daily
Colin Brace wrote:
Hi all,
I hate having to bother this list with tiresome compile problems, but here
goes:
Earlier this week, I installed 2.3.7 under Ubuntu (Breezy). At the
moment, I am trying to do the same under Fedora Core 4, but I am
having less success. In particular, I keep
Colin Brace wrote:
On 2/25/06, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
set PKG_CONFIG_PATH so that pkg-config picks up glib and gtk+ from the
right locations.
Ah, right, I changed that to /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/ to get glib to
compile. Ok, so I now change it back to
Paul Waldo wrote:
Hi all,
I am evaluating gimp on linux as a replacement for Photoshop on Windows. I
am
currently using Photoshop/Windows primarily for the color management
capabilities. I have tried printing from gimp to my Epson Stylus Photo 1280,
with horrible results--the colors
If your system has Python installed, be sure to build Gimp with
--enable-python so you can pick up the Python-specific filters as well.
:)
Congrats on getting Gimp 2.3.6 up and running!
Peace...
Tom
John
glib and gtk+ and other libs required by Gimp might be part of any current
Linux distro but they might not be the right versions required by any given
Gimp version.
As for the XML::Parser perl module, perl installations that come with Linux
distros will have some perl modules installed but not
John R. Culleton wrote:
On Monday 06 February 2006 01:10 am, peer miaskowski wrote:
Hi list!
Is it possible to do with the gimp (automatically?) what www.scanR.com
does?
On Linux systems Xsane, a scanner program, is a useful plugin.
Yep, it works very well. :)
John, I've
John R. Culleton wrote:
Tom, I never saw your original post but only Carol's reply. If
you could help me dig my way out of the swamp off list or on
list I would be grateful. I have Slack 10.2 installed. When Gimp
2.3.6 failed I tried to upgrade my libs and thoroughly messed
them up. But I
Carol Spears wrote:
does it fail this test if you ./configure --enable-mmx=no ?
there is a chance that all of that mmx stuff was just Helvetix showing
off.
I don't know. It's not critical for me to have the 2.3.x development
releases running. I was able to get 2.3.5 built and installed.
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Demetrius Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there way to change the default image resolution in the Gimp for
Windows so that I do not get the following message
[URL=http://imageshack.us][IMG]http://img247.imageshack.us/img247/3944
A friend of mine took a bunch of photos using her Vivitar 3.2MP digital
camera with the camera set at 640x480 resolution. She wanted 4x6 prints
of those and printed a bunch that came out looking all pixelated and
basically like crap. Since then, we've set her camera back to the max
Helen wrote:
Is anyone able to recommend the best (or a good) printer
for a Gimp user on a Linux (SuSE) system? I want good
quality prints, with good color. Cost is a factor, but
is not the most important factor. Gimp is the only
photo-editing program I use, but I don't have to use
Gimp for
Is it advisable to install the current development glib/gtk+ 2.7 libs to go along with this Gimp development release or should the stable glib/gtk+ libraries be used?
Peace...
Tom
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/10/2005 08:58
Ok, I'll try re-building to see if that fixes it.
Thanks!
Peace...
Tom
falolaf wrote:
I have EXIF browser working with the same Gimp version as you are on
MandrivaLinux 2005LE.
/Anders
Tom Williams wrote:
Hi! I'm running Gimp 2.2.8 on Linux and I just noticed the EXIF browser
Hi! I'm running Gimp 2.2.8 on Linux and I just noticed the EXIF browser
doesn't seem to be working. I've got an image that is known to have
EXIF data yet the EXIF browser reports there is none attached.
Does the EXIF browser work for anyone else?
Peace...
Tom
Sven Neumann wrote:
Spacebar to switch temporarily to move is awfully useful. I didn't
know about it until this discussion, but I've often wanted something
like that
See, that is exactly my point. The feature is not discoverable and it
might make sense to exchange it for something which
j Mak wrote:
I like the implementation of transient window
management system; it was a very good idea and works
very well on my gnome desktop.
What is the transient window management system?
Peace...
Tom
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Tom Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Suh-weet One feature I would like to see added is the ability to
select regions of the screen when taking a screenshot, like PrintKey
on Windows can.
The CVS version does that already.
Suh-weet! Ship it! :D
Peace...
Tom
Alan Horkan wrote:
[please trim the subject line in your responses]
Ok. :)
I think most users are frustrated by the gimp and less frustrated by
photoshop and the easiest way for them to express that is to make simple
comparisons rather than being able to suggest better ways to do things.
Yeah,
I'm running Gimp 2.2.6 on Windows 2000 and when I open a folder of images,
a thumbnail preview appears for each image I select.
I can send a screenshot if desired.
Peace
Tom
Olivier Ripoll
David Marrs wrote:
Easier for whom? the users or the developers? Since there's only one
GIMP set-up anyway, I don't see how it makes a difference; any
suggestion I make is going to be a direct result of the default GIMP
set-up that I'm using. I'm not biased by Photoshop, PSP or anything
Kalle Ounapuu wrote:
The bug-tracker serves it's purpose, but you can't expect everyone to be reading it over before making any comment about GIMP.
I agree. People use Gimp (or try to) and have a problem or criticism and post
their feedback here instead of filing bug/enhancement reports or
Gezim Hoxha wrote:
The drop shadow, I think, was just an example. What if, instead, I
wanted to make a bevel depth of a button deeper? The layers wouldn't
help me out, would they? In photoshop however, all I'd have to do is
drag a slider!
Gotcha. :)
Peace...
Tom
j Mak wrote:
Using them you
can experiment with various settings without changing
the set up of your layer structure. In addition, you
can edit your artwork, even months or years after
finishing it, simply by altering the Adjustment layer
or changing the layer effects parameters. For
instance, if
Thanks for the info! :)
I voted for Gimp. :)
Peace...
Tom
wayne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Herman wrote:
(snip)
Not to disparrage the hard work that was put into this hack but...
Let gimp be gimp and photoshop be photoshop.
I completely agree.
Peace...
Tom
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Frédéric wrote:
(snip)
If someone really want to use Gimp, he will find the menu. If gimpshop can
help to migrate from Photoshop, this is OK. And if Gimp gives choice to
arrange menus, this is great. Each one can choose the best solution for
him.
Based on the positive feedback on that blog, it
Those who crave a PhotoShop interface almost finally have it. :)
Thanks for the link. I will pass on this..
Peace...
Tom
wayne
wayne wrote:
One thing good about GimpShop is that I am now able to run Gimp 2.2.4. Have
not been able to install a RPM successfully till now.
Wayne
:)
Peace...
Tom
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Hi! Ok, I've used the GFlares that come with Gimp (I use Gimp 2.2.3 on Linux)
and they're cool. I'm looking for some more basic flares, like the one in
this image:
http://www.missingimages.com/photoshopjokes/images/lens_flares.jpg
or one like that in a + shape. Is it difficult to make flares
Carol Spears wrote:
okay, i am responding to my own email, i read somewhere that this is not
the best way to start your day or something.
the discussion was on this list and the promise was that it would be
fixed in the 2.2.2 release which was out yesterday.
i guess i just wish that it be restored
Ok, so I was trying to scale an image and I right-clicked and clicked Image,
then Scale Image, and when the scale image dialog appears I changed the units
from pixels to percentage and the number changed from pixels to some LARGE
number (like over 2000). When I specify a percentage that I want
I'm getting this result running make check to test Gimp 2.2-pre2 build:
Running gimp_composite_3dnow tests...
gimp_composite_3dnow: Instruction set is not available.
PASS: gimp-composite-3dnow-test
PASS: gimp-composite-altivec-test
Running gimp_composite_mmx tests...
FAIL: gimp-composite-mmx-test
The goal for 2.2 was to achieve a consistent and pleasant look. We
followed the advices of the GNOME Human Interface Guidelines and used
the spacings suggested there for most dialogs.
Does this mean Gimp on Windows will have a GNOME feel to it?
Peace...
Tom
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You might take a look at
http://registry.gimp.org/plugin?id=3892
which is a plug-in called Windows Gimp Deweirdifyer. It is rather
deprecated by the GIMP developers because of the obnoxious name and
inelegant coding, but a
Jozsef Mak wrote:
I am new to this mailing list but I have been using Gimp, with great
satisfaction, for about a year. When I download a new version of the
application, one of the first things I usually do is replace its
splash screen with my own design. I think, Gimp needs a clean,
minimalist
I'm running Gimp 2.0.4 on Linux with glib-2.4.6, gtk+-2.4.7, XFree86
4.4.0, and gimp-print 4.2.6. When I open an image (JPEG), it looks
perfect. When I print it to my Epson Stylus Photo 700, the image prints
ok but it has a red tint to it. Would this be a problem with gimp-print
or Gimp?
Asif Lodhi wrote:
Hi All
I always read posts regarding GIMP vs. Photoshop.
Wow! Interesting comments! How do you feel about comments comparing
GIMP and PhotoShop like this:
http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/04/30/217225tid=92tid=152tid=8
Peace...
Tom
Asif Lodhi wrote:
Though I am not fighting tool wars here ;), I would
certainly like to present my humble replies to the
honorary views presented by the poster on Slashdot.
Thanks for the commentary! :)
Peace...
Tom
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL
Alf C Stockton wrote:
2) Text tool in the new gimp does not give me the option to select
fonts or
text size or colour. Again please tell me what I have missed?
I'm also running Gimp 2.0.4 on Slackware (Slack 8) and the new text tool
DOES allow you to select fonts and text size and color.
Take a
I'm running Gimp 2.0.4 on Linux and I've got an image with some colored
text loaded and I want to create a new image with different text with
the same color. So, here is what I do:
1. Load the image with the colored text
2. Use the color chooser tool to choose the color of the text
3. Create a
matt-nc wrote:
At 08:07 PM 6/19/04 -0700, you wrote:
Ok, I'm trying to make a gradient that looks exactly like this:
http://www.bay-online-media.com/tom/graident.jpg
FYI (spelling correction for the link)
http://www.bay-online-media.com/tom/gradient.jpg
Doh! Sorry about that! Thanks for the
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
GIMP version 2.0.2 is now available from
ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/v2.0/.
Please use one of the mirrors listed at
http://www.gimp.org/downloads/#mirrors
This is a bug-fix release in the stable 2.0 series. Quite some bugs
have been fixed so an update is highly
I was able to make the white background transparent following this
procedure using Gimp 2.0.1 on Linux. This procedure should be platform
independent and possibly release independent:
1) Open the image
2) On the Layers dialog, create a new transparent layer
3) Click on the Background layer
Hi! I was installing various Gimp 2.0 plugins on Linux this morning and
installed the Exif browser so I could check it out:
http://registry.gimp.org/plugin?id=4153
I can't seem to find any information on how to actually invoke the
plugin to see the Exif data and I was wondering if anyone knew
Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
Le 23.05.2004 20:57:24, Tom Williams a écrit :
Hi! I was installing various Gimp 2.0 plugins on Linux this morning
and installed the Exif browser so I could check it out:
http://registry.gimp.org/plugin?id=4153
I can't seem to find any information on how
David Neary wrote:
Hi Tom,
(snip)
Alternatively, and perhaps simpler for a normal user, is to
open the plug-in details plug-in (Xtns-Plugin details), and
search for exif in the list view, then switch to the tree view to
see where it is in the menu tree.
Thanks for this info! I was able to
Depending on the JPEG quality threshold you specify, you might not see any
change in the image itself even though the file size WILL be smaller. This
is a GOOD thing to me. :)
Crank the image quality down to 10% and see if you see any quality
degredation. :) If you're specify quality in
Ok, I've forgotten my Gimp Bugzilla password and I've requested the
password be sent to me. I was e-mailed the link to use to reset my
password:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/token.cgi?a={some mangled token}
and when I access that link I get 403 Forbidden errors. :(
=
Zhang Weiwu wrote:
Hello. I have a png logo with alpha channel, it looks good on every
browser excepte IE, which rander the alpha channel to a single color.
I wish to set the optional png background color to be #222, the
background color of the webpage where the logo is. In this case even
IE
Hi! I'm trying to make an elliptical border around part of an image,
sort of like a picture frame. I use the Select Elliptical Regions
tool to select my region. Then I choose the color I want for the
selection and I choose a 5x5 solid circle brush to use for the stroke of
the selection.
Simon Budig wrote:
Sven Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Tom Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi! I'm trying to make an elliptical border around part of an image,
sort of like a picture frame. I use the Select Elliptical Regions
tool to select my region. Then I choose the color I
Eric Pierce wrote:
Well done, everyone!
It's been a pure joy following the 1.3 devel series and watching all the
new goodies ideas pour into the Gimp.
You are all a part of something truly big and beautiful!
My sincerest appreciation,
Eric Pierce
I agree 100%! Gimp 2.0 rocks and everyone
John Culleton wrote:
I only got to play with rc1 for less than a day and along
comes 2.0.0 the real thing. I did useful work already with
2.0.0rc1 But I had trouble configuring extra fonts. The
usual drill is to install e.g., freefont according to the
directions in the file, including a
Hi! Ok, I just installed Gimp 2.0rc1 on Linux. The build went smoothly
and I noticed the executable was installed as gimp instead of
gimp-1.3. I accidentally clobbered my Gimp 1.2.5 installation but I
can build that again. :)
Anywho, I was wondering if/when the Add Glow and the Perl-o-Tine
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 09:58:40PM -0800, Tom Williams wrote:
Hi! Ok, I just installed Gimp 2.0rc1 on Linux. The build went smoothly
and I noticed the executable was installed as gimp instead of
gimp-1.3. I accidentally clobbered my Gimp 1.2.5 installation but I
can
Simon Budig wrote:
Tom Williams ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So, I'm running gimp-2.0pre4 on Linux and I've got python 2.2.3 and
pygtk-2.2.0-RC1 installed. When I try to use the Python-FU Drop Shadow
and Bevel plugin, I get the dialog allowing me to configure the effect
but it doesn't run
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
