There are two pages that caught my attention immediately on visiting
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org.
There is this one:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org_Wiki:Copyrights.
And that leads to this interesting one:
It strikes me that there are two different wikis being talked about right now.
One is one that we need in the podling for incubation activities.
The other(s) are wikis that are part of the OpenOffice.org infrastructure for a
variety of purposes and may be public facing in different ways.
I'm
My impression, and it is only an impression, is that SVN is more transparent
and the web interfaces for it are valuable as part of that. One problem with
how I see git/hg being used is that work happens substantially out of view and
there is a secondary process for pushing/pulling changes.
I haven't figured out how one creates a new subtree on SVN (e.g., the missing
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openofficeorg/ repository) without
being a committer on the parent part of the tree (i.e., incubator).
Would someone who is able to do so please create the openofficeorg
Um, so where would that and other thoughts be on-topic? I have many thoughts
about on-/off-line help bridging too. Is this the ooo-issues list. (I really
must catch up on my reading of the groundrules here.)
I take it that the on-line help is under Oracle copyright and can be/has been
+1
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:apa...@robweir.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 10:35
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wiki for the project
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
It strikes me that there are two
: Wiki for the project - wiki.services.openoffice.org provenance
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 13:37, Frank Peters
frank.thomas.pet...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 14.06.2011 18:05, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
There are two pages that caught my attention immediately on visiting
http
Ah, so it is handled as a category. Nice.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Frank Peters [mailto:frank.thomas.pet...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 06:41
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: f...@openoffice.org
Subject: Re: Wiki for the project -
I think there needs to be something at the web page, even if an indirect to the
fledgling podling status page at
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openofficeorg.html.
Anything better than this space intentionally left blank for now.
- Dennis
ANECDOTAL EXPERIENCE
That's funny. I have
.
And there is no such thing as project lead at Apache. Everybody is a peer.
Cheers,
-g
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 22:34, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I notice that there is no JIRA Incubator Project for OpenOffice yet.
Something the project lead does? (Now we get to find out
+1
(And I am very much in favor of seeing a thriving import-export and
preservation business. I suspect it will be good to factor this way, both for
attention on core essentials and also to minimize dependencies across the code
body. And simplifying the attention and learning curve of
+1
(Workforces might not be a good term. I can see specialized lists for
addressing particular subject areas that have their own specialized traffic,
but it is careful to avoid suggesting organizational division when what we are
doing is filtering traffic. There are other ways to do that,
+1
(I also favor not solving a problem we don't have [yet].)
-Original Message-
From: IngridvdM [mailto:ingrid...@gmx-topmail.de]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 04:15
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Teams and Leads (was: Proposed short term goals)
Am 16.06.2011 13:00,
I think we should take Greg literally on this.
There has been more discussion, and I see us coming together. And there is
work for us to do in fostering leadership and having a successful and
fulfilling project.
- Dennis
SERMONETTE
I know, in my case, this will take some awkward and
+1
-Original Message-
From: Jomar Silva [mailto:homem...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 16:04
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Teams and Leads
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
[ ... ]
2) Have the national language projects run
+1
-Original Message-
From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 16:56
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Subversion history
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 19:00, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote:
If you want the older binary releases, then make a
There's an intermediate case:
There is also on-line versions of the help files and, in the LibreOffice
distributions I've been testing with, those are used if the
separately-downloadable off-line help is not installed. (The OOo-dev 3.4 beta
install that I have seems to have only the
I thought I'd try adding site/ at the ooo/ tree as a test (using Tortoise SVN
and having already done an SVN checkout).
On the commit, I was prompted for my user ID (orcmid) and my password, but I got
Error: access to '/repos/asf/!svn/ver/1135683/incubator/ooo' forbidden
I am using
My nosing around so far leads me to believe that this is like the response to
the Facebook relationship question: It's complicated. Until Facebook, I
had no idea how many people said that about their relationships.
Some sites have explicit CC-share-alike content, some have code that is
+1
-Original Message-
From: Simon Phipps [mailto:si...@webmink.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 13:46
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Subversion history
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 19:00, Tor Lillqvist
[mailto:khir...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 13:50
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Native Language vs l10n
Hi Dennis and all,
I would like to answer Dennis' questions :)
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
On ooo-dev we
://people.apache.org/committer-index.html
orcmid, Dennis E. Hamilton.
I may write emails to you starting with:
Hi orcmid san
Hi Dennis san
Hi E. san
HI Hamilton san
:)
But you see, orcmid doesn't sound to me, I think, or does it sound?
How about E., does it sound, ee period?
:)
Dennis san and Hamilton san
is melodic and gentle to me. Not sure if
the same to Japanese.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 18:57
To: 'ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org'
Cc: 'Kazunari Hirano'
Subject: OT: Orcmido-san
[ ... ]
If I
I'd say, generally, that this is partly a vanity/affinity e-mail domain, just
as The Documentation Foundation is preparing to do for libreoffice.org
(although I think you'll have to be a TDF Member to get one, not sure how high
that bar will be). It's like my @acm.org, @computer.org (when I
To add to what Drew says,
The Forum software also provides a cloaked e-mail interface on the profile
pages of members. That is, there is a link to create an e-mail and the forum
sends it to the registered e-mail address.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: drew
Oh dear, my past comes along to haunt me.
If you go to the home page, http://odma.info, you'll see that the other
Downloads link is to ODMA License 1.0 (modeled on the BSD License). If you
look in the lower right hand corner of the license page, you'll know why I
should be hiding behind the
that improving WebDAV and introducing CMIS support should have
higher priority than fixing ODMA.
- Kai.
On 21.06.11 11:19, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Oh dear, my past comes along to haunt me.
If you go to the home page, http://odma.info, you'll see that the other
Downloads link is to ODMA License 1.0
Subject: Re: Licensing odma.h (was RE: Some more strange files in the OOo code
- the Ghost of ODMA Past)
Hi,
On 22.06.11 11:09, Mathias Bauer wrote:
Hi Dennis,
On 22.06.2011 04:20, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
The ODMA Support showed up in the Novell editions of OpenOffice.org.
I don't think
The separate Hg repositories could go into separate sub-project branches if
that is more convenient for bringing them over. My sense is that once they are
in Subversion, it is relatively easy to massage them or consolidate into a
composite project tree (by SVN copying) that is where any
Details here: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/201106/msg00061.html
This is a public review.
From the announcement, which provides all details on locating the
specification and background on the process:
Comments may be submitted to the TC by any person through the use
of the OASIS
for the initial committers of the incubator podling.
All initial committers start out as if there has already been a vote to invite
them.
- Dennis E. Hamilton
BRIEF SUMMARY OF WHAT TO EXPECT AS AN INITIAL COMMITTER
1. After your iCAL has been received and registered, you will be invited to
specify one
It helps if patches are in-line in the mail note. (That way, EOL differences
are compensated for and those of us with an MS-DOS mentality don't have to save
the attachment to disk to find a way to view it correctly.)
- Dennis
PS: I guess I should find a way to change my default *.txt viewer
the wrath of
bottom-posting-vigilantes and the in-line-posting-hideen.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 15:38
To: 'ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org'
Subject: RE: Contributors versus Committers versus PMC members - AND USERS
.
- Dennis E. Hamilton
...@incubator.apache.org.
For more information on PPMC activities and responsibilities, see
http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html and
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html.
- Dennis E. Hamilton
, June 25, 2011 04:37
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Corrected two typos on website
On Jun 25, 2011 5:58 AM, Dick Groskamp th.grosk...@quicknet.nl wrote:
Op 24-6-2011 23:39, Dennis E. Hamilton schreef:
It helps if patches are in-line in the mail note. (That way, EOL
-Original Message-
From: imacat [mailto:ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw]
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2011 07:42
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [REQUEST] Initial Committers Please Confirm PPMC Participation.
On 2011/06/25 15:46, Dennis E. Hamilton said:
Initial committers who have been set up
Initial Committers for the Apache OpenOffice.org podling are those individuals
listed as Initial Committers on the incubator proposal immediately before
voting to accept the incubator proposal started:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207.
There is a FAQ
The current version of the Incubator Proposal is currently stable as it was at
the conclusion of the voting to accept the Podling into the Incubator Project.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal. Earlier today, a small
change to the page led to the Initial Committer table being
SHORT VERSION
After the iCLA is registered for an Invited/Initial Committer, there will be an
e-mail about establishing an Apache user name. Creation of the Apache ID is
initiated by reply to that e-mail.
If you believe you should have received such an e-mail by now, first check the
Long
When an Invited/Initial Committer is setup for the Apache OpenOffice.org
Podling, the next stage is to track them with regard to having joined the
Poddling PMC if they are also invited to be on the PPMC (as all Initial
Committers and Invitees are at this time).
Sometimes it is simply unclear
I'm only going to step into the middle of this for a second and then make a
hasty withdrawal.
Please keep them CC-BY. That is permissive. CC-SA is like a copyleft, and you
already handle that with dual licensing if that is what you continue to do.
You could also use ALv2 since it is more
I support this idea.
I think with regard to need for an SGA or not, there is the matter of the
current headings at the tops of source files. (I have no idea what is
required, I'm simply
observing what is there.)
- Dennis
These things (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_POI#History_and_roadmap) just
make me cringe. At least Charles Simonyi
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Simonyi)has the consolation of
traveling into space (twice!) and various philanthropic activities.
I assume, when speaking of an OLE2
-dev@incubator.apache.org; giffu...@tutopia.com
Subject: Re: Differences between OOO and LibreOffice.
On 30 June 2011 07:10, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Umm, 100% fidelity to/of what? I would love to understand the
qualifications that attach to that statement, and how
I think it is foolish to assign a metric to compatibility between OOO and
LibreOffice, and particularly between either and ODF. If the 1% matters to me,
it can be a show-stopper for my interoperability needs. The larger the take-up
of *Office.org, the greater the number of folks impacted by
Probably the first time for Apache/OOo folk and TDF folk to talk together will
be in conjunction with the Berlin Plugfest, July 14-15.
I can imagine common cause around how discretionary provisions of ODF are
handled in the implementations and how the implementation-dependent variability
is
It just occurred to me that a place for some sort of common agreement, and
publication of what they mean, are the OpenOffice.org Namespaces. I assume
these belong to OpenOffice.org, but governance of namespaces is odd business.
These are also something to coordinate with the LibreOffice folk
Just muddying the waters a little more,
Some recent list exchanges suggest to me that the LibreOffice folks are busily
getting rid of OpenSymbol (which the OpenOffice.org ODT of the ODF
specifications depend on for default bullets in lists!) but probably not for
the right reason: they just
For Initial Committers and Invited Committers, sending in your preferred Apache
User Name does not make you a committer yet. That makes your ID Pending, but
your committer status is not yet set up.
An e-mail from r...@apache.org (sometimes a week later) will indicate when the
Apache User Name
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com
wrote:
On 4 July 2011 21:01, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
+1 on circulation on ooo-dev.
I'm not sure which wiki you mean and whether that would limit
participation or not.
Sorry, I
[I am reminded that the best way to talk to the PPMC is on ooo-dev and there is
benefit in so doing. Here goes.]
PROPOSAL
ooo-security@incubator.a.o be set up as a private list and a selection of not
more than 10 security-aware PPMC members be subscribed to it. We need to work
out what the
Of Rob Weir
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 16:10
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Creation of ooo-security List
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Well, vulnerabilities are vulnerabilities
@project lists?
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 15:54
To: OOo-dev Apache Incubator
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Creation of ooo-security List
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote on Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 12:02:31 -0700:
I've
Ross,
You might find some crisp talking points in the status report as well, since
that text is being reviewed and will presumably be signed-off by a mentor
before you embark for Berlin.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com]
Sent:
I left the Community section empty on my last clean-up, but I promised to add
something today. When I do may last stats for how we are doing in a little
while, I will indicate a brief summary on what we have accomplished in having
folks on-board.
Although it is tempting to talk about what
For balance, I recommend lurking on [libreoffice-users] and
[libreoffice-documentation]. The developers list (counterpart of ooo-dev,
right down to patch pushing), [libreoffice] is part of a separate system. This
list is useful, especially for the tech steering committee minutes, and it may
:16 PM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Saturday, 9 July 2011 6:06 AM
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: ooo-dev list subscriber stats?
+1:
- introduce an AOOo blog so that the Community can
it was in the old project.
BTW:
What will be the URL name?
So, before a name will be setup we should clarify these things first.
Marcus
Am 07/08/2011 11:16 PM, schrieb Gavin McDonald:
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Saturday
= Pending PPMC? + complete below
PENDING ACTIONS
0 invite
0 accepted?
24 iCLA?
0 choose ID
5 ID chosen?
1 ID pending
15 PPMC?
55 complete
102 total
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 19:37
To: ooo-dev
Dang!
Well, I just jumped right in.
So, we want the blog to be the official voice of the project in some way?
Is that a requirement? Is that what we want? I thought that is what web sites
are for. Blogs have a different kind of voice in my experience.
I have lots of outlets for blogging,
Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Sunday, 10 July 2011 9:00 AM
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; ga...@16degrees.com.au
Subject: RE: Blog Created
And I can confirm that it is working, the full-post Atom feed is working, and
I
can author from
Subject: Re: Blog Created
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Dang!
Well, I just jumped right in.
So, we want the blog to be the official voice of the project in some way?
Is that a requirement? Is that what we want? I thought that is what web
sites are for. Blogs have a different kind
pent-up interest or else
the stats are just wacky.
I don't know what to make of this. Interesting though. The numbers are going
up across the board for the top 5. Europe is awake?
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Blog Created
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Dang!
Well, I just jumped right in.
So, we want the blog to be the official voice of the project in some way?
I think it will be seen that way by the reader
I just booked to arrive in Portland the afternoon of Sunday, July 24, returning
to Seattle in the afternoon of Tuesday, July 26.
I'm looking forward to meeting all who will be at OSCON for the first tutorial
day, Monday, July 25.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Danese Cooper
+1
That works for me, conceptually. I don't have any history with OpenOffice.org,
the project, however, so I intend to stay neutral on how this gets thrashed out.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 16:54
To:
-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 17:57
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: OpenOffice.org (was Re: Ooo blog)
+1
That works for me, conceptually. I don't have any history with OpenOffice.org,
the project, however, so I intend
We are just one month into being the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. It is
useful to interesting to take stock of all that is happening and where we are.
The main activity that we are all holding our breath over is the reconstitution
of the code base under Apache. There is also concern for the
, July 12, 2011 14:34
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Project + PPMC Growing Pains
Is this intended as a blog post? It reads like one. In particular I
don't see any proposals to discuss.
-Rob
On Jul 12, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
We
I'm delighted to see that you are submitting your iCLA.
Before we get too far ahead of ourselves, I want to point out that registration
of an iCLA is a prerequisite for becoming a committer, but it is not
sufficient. There must also be an invitation (which only Initial Committers
have
[mailto:acolor...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Alexandro
Colorado
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 12:20
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Dennis E. Hamilton
Subject: Re: Committers and Contributors and PPMC
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.namewrote:
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote
Rob's traveling, so I'll try my hand at this. (We're all new here, some are
just newer than others, but someone will have had experience with the
OpenOffice.org Oracle/Sun projects and may have some insight into what it takes
to support Solaris distributions.)
First, you're in the right place
PPMC Membership is by invitation. Becoming a committer is by invitation.
Generally, PPMC members are committers first.
For the Initial Committers and only the Initial Committers, there is an
automatic invitation to become a committer and to become a PPMC member. Once
the Initial Committer
. Just not so quickly [;).
Welcome back from Mallorca!
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Pavel Janík [mailto:pa...@janik.cz]
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2011 10:32
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: PPMC Membership and Responsibilities
Hi,
On Jul 16, 2011, at 7:15 PM, Dennis E
Yes, and we have a way to report and track bugs and other issues here [;).
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: sa3r...@gmail.com [mailto:sa3r...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Sam Ruby
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 14:58
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Project + PPMC
I think that the desire to have a full history is a serious one.
I fancy Michael's option 3 (that which shall not be numbered [;). It sounds
like the least that could possibly work, so it strikes me as an important
approach to consider, especially if it sheds critical path for getting the code
Yes, the LibreOffice icons are different. The overall theme is green, not
blue. The general symbol is a page with a large corner cut and a dark corner
exposed beneath.
The lines and the dark corner are different colors for the different
applications within LibreOffice. For larger versions
...
Dennis,
Use the url below to see them...
https://skydrive.live.com/#!/?cid=69f0fbe8e03b2c13sc=documentsnl=1uc=1id=69F0FBE8E03B2C13%211171!cid=69F0FBE8E03B2C13id=69F0FBE8E03B2C13%211172sc=documents
Michael
From: Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
To: ooo
There are 20 Initial Committers on the OpenOffice.org incubator proposal who
have not yet submitted iCLAs or informed us of their intention not to do so.
Today I used the following format for a message to one of those Initial
Committers.
Before 19 more of these are sent out I wanted to check
I'm not up for working on CMIS at this time, personally, but I think there is
an open-source toolkit from Alfresco that might help if it is not already being
used. John Newton was very keen on encouraging CMIS adoption, of course.
I also agree that using the open-standards route for an adapter
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Initial Committer: Apache OpenOffice.org Initial
Committer Status
El 22/07/2011 5:10, Dennis E. Hamilton escribió:
There are 20 Initial Committers on the OpenOffice.org incubator proposal who
have not yet submitted iCLAs or informed us of their intention not to do so
My sense is that no one is a committer for the Apache OpenOffice.org podling
who has not shown up on this list:
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#ooo. That does not
happen until after the Apache user name/ID has been issued by root@.
Likewise, one is not on the PPMC until
Ingrid,
You can help me.
I am having difficulty finding a concrete case for completely open-ended
invitation of Initial Committers.
Suppose you were on the Initial Committer list. You had not sent an iCLA. You
had not responded to a request to take that step as part of being established
as
I think election is an incorrect threshhold. I think the comparable state
would be taking office, and that means having the Apache user name/ID and being
in authz for the particular project. You can't actually perform as a committer
until that has been accomplished.
- Dennis
Of course, my
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: When does one become a committer?
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I think election is an incorrect threshhold. I think the comparable state
would be taking office, and that means having the Apache
-
From: IngridvdM [mailto:ingrid...@gmx-topmail.de]
Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2011 14:09
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Initial Committer: Apache OpenOffice.org Initial
Committer Status
Hi Dennis,
Am 23.07.2011 21:35, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
Ingrid,
You can help me
What ODF Oligarchy?
OASIS certainly had nothing to do with branding of OpenOffice.org and its
choice of icons. The ODF TC has never been consulted on such matters.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Larry Gusaas [mailto:larry.gus...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2011 13:24
To:
Your rewording is fine with me. Thanks.
And thank you for the discussion. It is important to explore all of the
concerns that arise around the Initial Committer situation that we have.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: IngridvdM [mailto:ingrid...@gmx-topmail.de]
Sent: Sunday, July
TBD = To Be Determined/Defined
There was extensive discussion with Greg Stein and Marcus (and others) in
previous weeks on this list. Greg's last post was July 9, as previously noted.
There has been further work/discussion by Mathias Bauer, Michael Stahl, Marcus
Lange, Eike Rathke, and
Did you try Watch on the Tools button for the page you want to receive update
notices about?
- Dennis
PS: Since this is an open, public wiki, I suspect there is no diffs feed.
-Original Message-
From: florent andré [mailto:florent.andre-...@4sengines.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27,
Now that we've confirmed that the ooo-security list exists and the three
moderators appear to be subscribers, I believe the next action is to subscribe
the existing OO.o/LibreOffice security folk, per
Ahem.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 04:56
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: OOO340 to svn
[ ... ]
I have created ooo on apache-extras, but would like to give a full 72 hour
discussion to see what support looks
Greg,
Simple version of the question: Is your putting notices on everything your
personal practice or is it a requirement that this be done with all textual
artifacts where notices are possible?
- Dennis
LONGER VERSION
I looked over the ooo/trunk/tools/dev/ repository and noticed that you
...@robweir.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 19:09
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Population of ooo-security
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
Now that we've confirmed that the ooo-security list exists and the three
moderators appear
[mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 13:06
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Subject: Re: Q: Notices in Code
On Jul 28, 2011 12:44 PM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote
We are in a very fledgling situation here. Let's see if we can clear up a few
things.
Here is my understanding of the situation as it exists at the moment.
- Dennis
1. The ooo-security@i.a.o list is private and moderated. Anyone can send a
message to the list. The three current
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Operating ooo-security (was RE: Population of ooo-security)
I just sent in a test email from my work email. Please do not divulge my
employer. (Ah these corporate rules ;-)
Regards,
Dave
On Jul 29, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
You're probably right
Since the ooo-security list became operational, there have been a few requests
to subscribe to the list.
After the e-mail confirmation ceremony, applicants will be told, by the
mail-list robot, that the initiation of their subscription awaits approval by a
moderator.
PLEASE NOTE: UNINVITED
29, 2011 21:56
To: dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Cc: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Q: Notices in Code - Answered and Thanks Y'All
Geezus. You are continuing to be obtuse. I have *no* idea what you're talking
about.
On Jul 29, 2011 9:21 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote
1 - 100 of 1112 matches
Mail list logo
