t;
> Edwina.
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Sungchul Ji <s...@rci.rutgers.edu>
> *To:* PEIRCE-L <peirce-l@list.iupui.edu>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 29, 2015 8:02 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: signs, correlates, and triadic relations
>
> Edwina,
>
and Critical Thinking*
> *Communication Studies*
> *LaGuardia College of the City University of New York*
> *C 745*
> *718 482-5690 <718%20482-5690>*
>
--
Sungchul Ji, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Department of P
need an *existential *object or interpretant but it
> still functions within a triadic semiosis.
>
> Edwina
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Sungchul Ji <s...@rci.rutgers.edu>
> *To:* Matt Faunce <mattfau...@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* PEIRCE-L <peirce-l@list
they are conceptually
> substantive. I strongly reject your mechanical reductionism.
>
> Edwina
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Sungchul Ji <s...@rci.rutgers.edu>
> *To:* PEIRCE-L <peirce-l@list.iupui.edu>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 29, 2015 6:47 PM
> *Subje
reak still has an
> object--the geometrical line--even though it does not exist. The
> bullet-hole still has an interpretant--immediate, as well as final--even
> though it does not exist.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jon S.
>
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Sungchul Ji <s...@rci.rutgers.
cases the signs are
> still only signs within their triad; it's just that the object or
> interpretant doesn't need to be existent.
>
> Matt
>
> On 12/29/15 3:14 PM, Matt Faunce wrote:
>
> On 12/29/15 2:56 PM, Sungchul Ji wrote:
>
> Jon A, List,
>
> Here is one q
John Collier
>
> Professor Emeritus, UKZN
>
> http://web.ncf.ca/collier
>
>
>
> *From:* sji.confor...@gmail.com [mailto:sji.confor...@gmail.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Sungchul Ji
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 29 December 2015 2:34 PM
> *To:* PEIRCE-L
> *Subject:* Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: sig
t;non-Peircean" to think that something non-triadic
> CANNOT be a sign. If this is true, then Peirce's writings must identify
> something non-triadic that CAN be a sign. I asked you to provide such a
> citation.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jon S.
>
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015
y
> to a limited extent. Just my opinion, of course.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
> Professional Engineer, Amateur Philosopher, Lutheran Layman
> www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt - twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
>
, though, but just wish everyone a happy Solstice!
>>
>>
>>
>> Gary f.
>>
>>
>>
>> } We are natural expressions of a deeper order. [Stuart Kauffman] {
>>
>> http://gnusystems.ca/wp/ }{ *Turning Signs* gateway
>>
>>
>>
at its genuine Secondness to the Object *does
>> *have something to do with its character, which is not the case with the
>> Icon as defined above.
>>
>>
>>
>> Finally, we come to the Thirdness of the Symbol in its trichotomy. The
>> Thirdn
ote:
> Sung,
>
> Having a character that makes it a sign is not yet being a sign to someone
> of something. The first is potential, the second is actualization.
>
> Regards,
> Jon
>
> http://inquiryintoinquiry.com
>
> On Dec 21, 2015, at 12:33 AM, Sungchul Ji
t; history.
>
> Edwina
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Helmut Raulien <h.raul...@gmx.de>
> *To:* colli...@ukzn.ac.za
> *Cc:* Sungchul Ji <s...@rci.rutgers.edu> ; PEIRCE-L
> <peirce-l@list.iupui.edu>
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 20, 2015 5:40 PM
>
ity it signifies, nor because it stands in
>> any reactive relation with its object, but simply and solely because it
>> will be interpreted to be a sign. I call such a sign a symbol. As an
>> example of a symbol, Goethe's book on the Theory of Colors will serve. This
>> is m
universe).
>
> Now, I'm off to a holiday party, but I thought I'd best make this point
> clear before there was any further confusion.
>
> Best,
>
> Gary R
>
>
>
> [image: Gary Richmond]
>
> *Gary Richmond*
> *Philosophy and Critical Thinking*
> *Communica
mentation*. It determines such interpretant as it may, without
> manifesting a special intention of determining a particular interpretant.
> It is a perfection of a symbol, if it does this; but it is not essential to
> a symbol that it should do so. Erase the co
are precissively abstracted from the object, and then something like a
> diagram (what he will later call a percipuum) comes in as the interpretant
> of the qualisign. The remarks he makes about the conventional symbols
> expressed as part of a perceptual judgment (e.g., "it
subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
> PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to
> peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L
> but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the
&
gt;> PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to
>> peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L
>> but to <l...@list.iupui.edu>l...@list.iupui.edu with the line
>> "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More
f an uncontrollable inference.
>
> -- Franklin
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Sungchul Ji <s...@rci.rutgers.edu> wrote:
>
>> Franklin, List,
>>
>> You wrote the following statements with quotation marks:
>>
>>
>> "Smoke, qua typ
they represented embodied sign classes. They simply do not.
>
> Best,
>
> Gary R
>
> [image: Gary Richmond]
>
> *Gary Richmond*
> *Philosophy and Critical Thinking*
> *Communication Studies*
> *LaGuardia College of the City University of New York*
> *C 745*
> *718 4
s if
> they represented embodied sign classes. They simply do not.
>
> Best,
>
> Gary R
>
> [image: Gary Richmond]
>
> *Gary Richmond*
> *Philosophy and Critical Thinking*
> *Communication Studies*
> *LaGuardia College of the City University of New York*
> *
plines.
All the best.
Sung
Sungchul Ji, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy
Rutgers University
Piscataway, N.J. 08855
732-445-4701
www.conformon.net
Referecnes:
[1] S. Ji (1997). Isomorphism
a singular. So I don’t see
>> how the concept of qualisign can serve the purpose you suggest here. I
>> think the qualisign is simply a necessary result of Peirce’s introduction
>> of the trichotomy of signs based on the sign’s mode of being in itself. It
>> has to be First in that trichoto
First in that trichotomy.
>>
>
>
> -
> PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
> PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to
> peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a mess
(*5*) This leads me to suggest the following generalization:
"Just as a *network* cannot exist without *nodes* and *edges*, so it is
impossible to *communicate* without *signs* and *information *they carry."
(120815-3)
With all the best.
Sung
--
Sungchul Ji, P
subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
> PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to
> peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L
> but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the
t 9:28 PM, Edwina Taborsky <tabor...@primus.ca> wrote:
> Sung, your comment doesn't make any sense. Because Peirce's three
> categories don't correlate to the three worlds of Burgin and Popper [both
> of whom are excellent scholars] , doesn't mean that Peircean theory doesn't
> have anythi
rgin [4]".
Sorry for the confusion.
S. Ji
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Sungchul Ji <s...@rci.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> Edwina, Gary R, John, lists,
>
> Edwina wrote:
>
> "Because Peirce's three categories don't correlate to the three worlds of
> Burgin and Popper
ical nominals as 'subjective, objective and general' - and these
> are not valid outlines of the three categories.
>
> Edwina
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Sungchul Ji <s...@rci.rutgers.edu>
> *To:* PEIRCE-L <peirce-l@list.iupui.edu>
> *Sent:* Wed
th Peirce if he
confines his "Mind" to those processes and structures in the Universe that
embody ITR.
With all the best.
Sung
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Clark Goble <cl...@lextek.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 30, 2015, at 10:50 AM, Sungchul Ji <s...@rc
ments or assertions is a very helpful
> endeavor for clarity.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
> PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to
> peirce-L@list.iupui.
ructures') through the mathematics of tensor algebra (or
matrix mathematics).
If you have any questions or comments, please let me know or contact the
author directly at spetouk...@gmail.com.
All the best.
Sung
--
Sungchul Ji, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Departme
vitable if unintended goal.
> If the research program subtended by *semeiotic*
> <http://languagelore.net/glossary/semeiotic/> neostructuralism can be
> made to work, then it will indeed conflict with Chomskyan linguistics—and
> prove superior to it.
>
>
>
>
&
ted by me for the
> purposes of setting off my way of doing linguistics from the current
> mainstream brand.
>
> Best,
> Michael
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sungchul Ji
> Sent: Nov 28, 2015 11:02 AM
> To: Michael Shapiro
> Cc: CSP
> Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] ma
Peirce
> furnish the framework for the detailed study of semiotic relations which
> follows after CP 2.242.]
>
>
>
> Gary f.
>
>
> -
> PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
>
tive power, the sunflower would become a Representamen of
> the sun. But *thought* is the chief, if not the only, mode of
> representation.
>
>
>
> Gary f.
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> -
> PEIRCE-L subscribers:
f the pragmatic maxim then I’m not sure
> the move you make works. (Which is not to say Peirce necessarily thought
> along those terms of course - I’m just not clear what he thought here)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> PEIRCE-L su
more or less sure indication of there being
> established in our nature some habit which will determine our actions. (EP
> 1:114)
>
>
> If one thinks that beliefs have degrees of strength then I think it
> follows that this notion of strength is how often the tendency towards a
>
t; to REPLY ON
> PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to
> peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L
> but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the
> BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/pe
men of
> the sun. But *thought* is the chief, if not the only, mode of
> representation.
>
>
>
> Gary f.
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
> PEIRCE-L t
gt; reality.
>
>
>
> Ed.
> ------
>
> *Von:* sji.confor...@gmail.com [mailto:sji.confor...@gmail.com] *Im
> Auftrag von *Sungchul Ji
> *Gesendet:* Montag, 23. November 2015 18:22
> *An:* Jon Awbrey
> *Betreff:* Re: Terms, Propositions, Arguments
>
&
ny, impact the "updated"
concept of "habits" might have on the metaphysics of Peirce.
All the best.
Sung
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Clark Goble <cl...@lextek.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 23, 2015, at 6:30 AM, Jon Awbrey <jawb...@att.net <jawb...@att.net>>
&g
hin God’s being (or even its ground)? I confess it’s not
> something I’ve studied in the least.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
> PEIRCE-L
requirement for the
action of a codon because the *resonant frequencies* of a codon embody both
the *vibrational energy* and the *information about the molecular mass and
shape* of the codon that determine its *resonant waves*.
All the best.
Sung
--
Sungchul Ji, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Pharmaco
, 2015 at 10:56 AM
Subject: AW: [PEIRCE-L] [biosemiotics:8949] Re: Terms, Propositions,
Arguments
To: Sungchul Ji <s...@rci.rutgers.edu>, CLARK GOBLE <cl...@lextek.com>
Cc: PEIRCE-L <peirce-l@list.iupui.edu>
Sung,
your Peirce quote shows that this great man as so many others
and produces certain effects
> in the motion of bodies. Newton’s authentic second law that states the
> geometrical proportionality of force and change in motion (and therefore
> the time-irreversibility of a generated change in motion) is a true causal
> “law of cause and effect”.
>
&
anation of the higher cortex––and probably not just the speech centers
> either, since so many of our capacities for sensation and action would be
> bootless without our capacities for speech.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on &qu
man brain only; geometry is
> "cosmocentric" and refers to the reality and truth of Nature (based on the
> reality and measurability of space and time)
>
> Ed.
>
> --
> *Von:* sji.confor...@gmail.com [mailto:sji.confor...@gmail.com] *Im
&
Hi,
A correction:
Please replace "nucleotides, A, T, G, and C for DNA and RNA" in (*4*)
with "nucleotides,
A, T, G, and C for DNA, and A,T, G and U for RNA".
Thanks.
Sung
-- Forwarded message ------
From: Sungchul Ji <s...@rci.rutgers.edu>
Date: Tu
we find him saying the following: "The man is a symbol. Different men, so
>> far as they can have any ideas in common, are the same symbol. Judgment is
>> the determination of the man-symbol to have whatever interpretant the
>> judged proposition has." (ibid, p
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sungchul Ji <s...@rci.rutgers.edu>
Date: Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] The Universe as a Self-Organizing Musical
Instrument (USOMI)
To: John Collier <colli...@ukzn.ac.za>
John, Jerry, lists,
(1) John asked, &quo
's categories
>
>
>
> Dear List
>
> I hope that you will have patience with what may be a very ignorant
> question. In CP8.328, Perice defines thirdness as follows:
>
> Thirdness is the mode of being of that which is such as it is, in bringing
> a second and third into rel
; To: biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee
>
> Subject: [biosemiotics:8913] Peirce's categories
>
>
>
> Dear List
>
> I hope that you will have patience with what may be a very ignorant
> question. In CP8.328, Perice defines thirdness as follows:
>
> Thirdness is the mode of being o
;
> - PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List"
> or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should
> go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to
> PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with
Hi,
Correction:
Please change " . . . dyadic communications cannot lead to any
communication." in my previous post to
". . .dyadic interactions cannot lead to any communication."
Thanks.
Sung
-- Forwarded message ------
From: Sungchul Ji <s...@rci.rutg
: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
> PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to
> peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L
> but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L&q
RCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to
> peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L
> but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the
> BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm
> .
>
>
&g
s
Thought, 2016, Cambridge Scholars Publishing [in press].*
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Sungchul Ji <s...@rci.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> Stephen, Jeffrey, Edwina, lists,
>
> (1) In connection with the debate on nominalism vs. realism, it may be
> of some interest to consider
the three
worlds of Popper, Penrose, and Burign [1].
f = natural sciences; g = human sciences; h = innate
knowledge (?)
With all the best.
Sung
________
Sungchul Ji, Ph. D.
Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Rutgers Univer
k on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
> PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to
> peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L
> but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the
> BODY of the
-----
From: Sungchul Ji <s...@rci.rutgers.edu>
Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 6:04 AM
Subject: Fwd: The First Law of Quantitative Semiotics: Information =
Changes in Shannon Entropy, or I = dH
To: Sungchul Ji <sji.confor...@gmail.com>
-- Forwarded message ------
From: Sungchul Ji
ntal triad has more interpretations than a Peircean sign .
> For instance, when an individual speaks or e-mails to another individual,
> it is a fundamental triad but I don't know how to interpret this system as
> a Peircean sign.
>
> Sincerely,
>Mark
>
> On 7/5/2014 2
nguage
theory [12].
(*10*) In conclusion, I would heartily agree with Danko that
"Peirce's philosophy (at least a part of it) may even get some sort of a
foundation in hard sciences, which would be amazing."
With all the best.
Sung
Sungchu
nko.niko...@gmail.com
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
> PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to
> peirce-L@list.iupui.e
" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
> PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to
> peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L
> but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the
> BODY of the message. More at h
ero (no changes in
information or uncertainty) or negative (information lost or uncertainty
increased), whereas Shannon entropy H is always positive.
Any questions or comments would be welcome.
Sung
-
Sungchul Ji, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Department of Pharmacolo
f = perception/consciousness (?); g =
conceptualization (?); and
h = correspondence or grounding (?)
If you have any questions, suggestions or corrections, let me know.
All the best.
Sung
____
Sungchul Ji, Ph.D.
A
that the *Planckian information*, I_P,
increases from the bottom to the top in Figure 1.
With all the best.
Sung
_
Sungchul Ji, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy
toms* (hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, . . .; *Physics*)
*Figure 1.* Nine levels of material ORGANIZATION with associated EMERGENT
properties.
Reproduced and modified from [biosemiotics:8854].
If you have any comments or questions, let me know.
With all the best.
Sung
--
Sungchul Ji
, that
> cells are a kind of molecules, is a metaphor. And it is only understandable
> (for an alien who has visited the earth, and whose body does not consist of
> cells) from the time on when there have emerged multicellular organisms.
> Best,
> Helmut
>
>
> "
hamton.edu> wrote:
>
> Sung -- Yes, in this case either interpretation is possible. But the
> consequences of each choice are quite different, each representing a
> different discourse.
>
> STAN
>
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Sungchul Ji <s...@rci.rutgers.e
iel Bohr and Complementarity: An
Introduction. Springer, New York.
[3] Ji, S. (2015). Emergence vs. Invariance: Are they complementary
aspects of complex systems ? Posted to PEIRCE-L on 9/1/2015.
--
Sungchul Ji, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Department of Pharmacology a
Hi,
(*1*) Emergence is one of the best known characteristics of complex
systems [1]. One simple example of emergence is the formation of water from
the chemical reaction (involving electronic rearrangements of molecules)
between oxygen and hydrogen:
O_2 + 2 H_2 --> 2 H-O-H (essential
, create Mona's unique smile. Those are the interpretants
of the mystery.
Regards,
Tom wyrick
On Aug 27, 2015, at 11:18 AM, Sungchul Ji s...@rci.rutgers.edu wrote:
Tom, lists,
I accept the aesthetic interpretation of Mona Lisa you cited. But to some
researchers, Mona Lisa embodies more
somewhat pursed.
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/d-brief/2015/08/14/mona-lisa-smile/#.Vd524MQ8KrV
On Aug 24, 2015, at 6:30 PM, Sungchul Ji s...@rci.rutgers.edu wrote:
Hi Gary S, Gary R, lists,
A thought just occurred to me that there may be a connection between the
beauty of Mona Lisa
.
Best,
Ed.
Am 25.08.2015 um 01:30 schrieb Sungchul Ji:
Hi Gary S, Gary R, lists,
A thought just occurred to me that there may be a connection between the
beauty of Mona Lisa (holism) and the various chemical pigments
(reductionism) that constitute it -- namely, the organization of matter
/peirce-l.htm
.
--
Sungchul Ji, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy
Rutgers University
Piscataway, N.J. 08855
732-445-4701
www.conformon.net
-
PEIRCE-L subscribers
Definitions of The Sign by C. S. Peirce.
http://www.iupui.edu/~arisbe/rsources/76DEFS/76defs.HTM.
All the best.
Sung
---
Sungchul Ji, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Department
. PEIRCE-L posts should go to
peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L
but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L in the
BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm
.
--
Sungchul Ji, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
from my iPad
On Aug 24, 2015, at 6:00 PM, Sungchul Ji s...@rci.rutgers.edu wrote:
Gary, list,
There is a minor error in Slide 23:
R should be associated with quali, sin, and legi, and
O should be associated with icon, index and symbol.
All the best.
Sung
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015
it on the
microlevel.
All the best.
Sung
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Sungchul Ji s...@rci.rutgers.edu wrote:
Hi Gary S, Gary R, lists,
I agree that certain aspects (e.g., qualia) of Peircean semiosis cannot
be reduced to mechanical terms, because life is more COMPLEX than physics
/1210/1210.7439.pdf. Downloaded on 1/1/2015.
[6] Deutsch, D. and Marletto, C. (2014). Constructor Theory of
Information. arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1405/1405.5563.pdf
--
Sungchul Ji, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Ernest
in the other thread, note that
Peirce here clearly uses Sign (capitalized) to designate one relatum
among three, not the triad itself.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Sungchul Ji s...@rci.rutgers.edu wrote:
In a recent article (Semiosis stems from logical incompatibility
be a sign without referent, or
so-called referent that is the work itself.
Regards,
Robert
*From:* sji.confor...@gmail.com [mailto:sji.confor...@gmail.com] *On
Behalf Of *Sungchul Ji
*Sent:* Sunday, August 16, 2015 10:50 PM
*To:* biosemiotics biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee
*Subject
not to PEIRCE-L
but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L in the
BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm
.
--
Sungchul Ji, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Ernest Mario School
on these lists give me some
example of this ?
I always thought that Peirce defined an interpretant as the effect that a
sign has on the mind of an interpreter. Perhaps this is a misunderstanding
on my part ?
All the best.
Sung
--
Sungchul Ji, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology
out to be a mathematical category, as
depicted in Figure 1 below.
If you have any questions or comments, let me know.
All the best.
Sung
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sungchul Ji s...@rci.rutgers.edu
Date: Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:52 PM
Subject: ENERGY, INFORMATION
with the architectonic theory of human knowledge advocated by Peirce.
All the best.
Sung
Sungchul Ji, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy
Rutgers University
Piscataway
. To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L
but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L in the
BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm
.
--
Sungchul Ji, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Department
in a general way.
Regards,
Jon
On 8/4/2015 6:20 AM, Sungchul Ji wrote:
Hi Jon,
* In other words, we should not confuse a general term, one that applies
to many individuals, with a term that denotes a general entity,
property,
or universal *
Can you provide one or two concrete
. That's it. And that's all you can learn about the
types of time so long as you respect reality and
Nature.
Ed.
Am 29.07.2015 um 00:19 schrieb Sungchul Ji:
Hi Ed,
What I am claiming is that there may be three types of times --
'real',
'physical', and
'formal'
that are mutually
will keep my post to
PEIRCE-L free of any attachments, and, if necessary, they will be uploaded
to my web site, http://www.conformon.net, following Ben's original
suggestion.
All the best.
Sung
--
Sungchul Ji, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Department of Pharmacology
,
Ed.
Am 28.07.2015 um 21:49 schrieb Sungchul Ji:
Hi,
I am wondering if time is irreducibly triadic in the following three
senses:
(*1*) As a Peircean sign, i.e., time as a name or a representamen
referring to a process and interpreted by a mind as such:
f
--
Sungchul Ji, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy
Rutgers University
Piscataway, N.J. 08855
732-445-4701
www.conformon.net
-
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on Reply List or Reply
-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to
peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L
but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L in the
BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm
.
--
Sungchul Ji, Ph.D
) to proceed with theoretical
considerations which ignore fundamental errors about and misconceptions of
the basic theory of motion.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
Best wishes,
Ed.
Am 22.07.2015 um 23:56 schrieb Sungchul Ji:
Stan, Edwina, Tom, lists,
(1) I am always impressed
of the 19th
century:
BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION AS SEMIOSIS
(072115-1)
All the best.
Sung
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sungchul Ji s...@rci.rutgers.edu
Date: Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Instinct and emotion
To: Stephen Jarosek sjaro
is not workable. sj
*From:* sji.confor...@gmail.com [mailto:sji.confor...@gmail.com] *On
Behalf Of *Sungchul Ji
*Sent:* Monday, 20 July 2015 4:35 PM
*To:* PEIRCE-L
*Subject:* Re: [PEIRCE-L] Instinct and emotion
Stephen, Edwina, lists,
That is, if people are going to go along
at the level of the DNA molecule that my
thinking diverges.
*From:* Stephen Jarosek [mailto:sjaro...@iinet.net.au]
*Sent:* Tuesday, 21 July 2015 11:13 PM
*To:* 'Sungchul Ji'
*Cc:* 'PEIRCE-L'
*Subject:* RE: [PEIRCE-L] Instinct and emotion
Sung, I understand where you are coming from... I
1 - 100 of 306 matches
Mail list logo
