cannot delineate here in full context. It's not
about quotations for me - it's deconstruction of the very structural process of
mediation/communication/language/physics itself and then quotations as and when
necessary (I've received many here already which I am framing constantly).
_
Jack
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf of Jon Alan Schmidt
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2023 11:46 PM
To: Peirce-L
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Objects and Perception (was God and the
Universe (was The Thing In Itself))
Jack, List:
JRKC
, I
think, to most or all people here).
Jack
____
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf of John F Sowa
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2023 5:24 AM
To: Jon Alan Schmidt ; Peirce-L
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Objects and Perception (was God and the
Universe (was T
448n, EP 2:394, 1906)--which
is precisely why it is intelligible at all. In short, everything is, in itself,
of the nature of a sign, and therefore cognizable.
Cheers,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAl
less you
> understand the necessity of that price (and thus I understand his admission
> of it, whether people agree or not, as his own understanding of Kant as
> actually accurate).
>
> I have traced the nuance precisely, in longer form, yet to be published,
> as to where Pei
nly in the imagination of Kant and his true
believers.
John
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEI
ia. Then i always need a second opinion to exclude it. One last question: What is superior, and in which aspect, to deduction?
Best
Helmut
Gesendet: Sonntag, 11. Juni 2023 um 18:54 Uhr
Von: "JACK ROBERT KELLY CODY"
An: "Helmut Raulien"
Cc: "Peirce-L" , &qu
same reluctance like you do, but always am open minded towards any paranoia. Then i always need a second opinion to exclude it. One last question: What is superior, and in which aspect, to deduction?
Best
Helmut
Gesendet: Sonntag, 11. Juni 2023 um 18:54 Uhr
Von: "JACK ROBERT KEL
nciples: The First Rule of Reason,
Fallibilism, and no limit to the amount of time that may be required.
Most authors who comment on Peirce mention those three principles. But they
don't apply them to questions about the unknown or unknowable Ding an sich.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subs
John Sowa and Peirce-l,
The discussion about The Thing in Itself has been interesting. I think you’re
right to remind some of us of the importance of biographies and the history of
time when determining what Peirce and Kant “really” said about
things-in-themselves. You demonstrate the value
to attend the next LUW session June 14, register here:
https://www.springer.com/journal/11787/updates/23910922
Jean-Yves Beziau
Editor-in-Chief Logica Universalis
President of LUA (Logica Universalis Association)
http://www.logica-universalis.org/LUAD
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click
or details here are major categorical
issues which explicate the very nuance which thus ignites the very realm of
inquiry we all aspire to.
Best
Jack
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE
be an illusion. Like the buddhists say, they like it that way, I don´t. But, by them, the suspicion is there. But might it be proven, if it was so, or disproven if it wasn´t?
Best
Helmut
Gesendet: Sonntag, 11. Juni 2023 um 16:29 Uhr
Von: "JACK ROBERT KELLY CODY"
An: "
Dear John Shook,
I had sent a note to Peirce-L about a lecture that a colleague and I had
presented on May 31st. And it was extremely critical of GPT and related
systems. Their only good and reliable contribution is their ability to do
better machine translation than previous AI systems
lusion for it, my mistake. but i think it is
>> sound (that's not the purpose here).
>>
>> interpretant generation ala Peirce and dynamical objects is really what
>> I'm after here (people's understanding of it). synthetising Kant and Peirce
>> and I know a lot of each, but
appy to share. It is
very nuanced. So nuanced as to be diaphanous. Thus, it's hardly a sin. It's a
mind-boggling topic and whilst he was trained from an early age, and his
semiotic remains the best, that training doesn't necessarily work in your favor
if you need to think outside the box. N
; interpretant generation ala Peirce and dynamical objects is really what
> I'm after here (people's understanding of it). synthetising Kant and Peirce
> and I know a lot of each, but my knowledge of the second pales in specifics
> when it comes to general terminology.
>
> best
from the premises and highlights the
distinction between the perceived copies of object 1 and the object
itself. It suggests that the perceived copies are subjective
representations or experiences of the object rather than being
identical to the object as it exists independently of perception.
knowledge of the second pales in specifics when it
comes to general terminology.
best
jack
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf of JACK ROBERT KELLY CODY
Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2023 9:30 PM
To: Jon Alan Schmidt ; Peirce-L
; s...@bestweb.net ; robert
imself, with Gangle, Colapietro, et al) gone into the
mechanics of this extensively. Would just wonder what people make of it from
within the Peircean semeiotic, now, not so much as to thing in itself's
in(cognizablility).
Best
Jack
________
From: peirce-l-requ...@lis
tly different copies of the quotation from R
843. One of them should be deleted.
John
From: "Jon Alan Schmidt"
As I have documented with exact quotations previously
(https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2021-09/msg00208.html)
quotations previously (
https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2021-09/msg00208.html), by his
own testimony Peirce was a theist, not a pantheist nor a panentheist. He
professed to believe that God is the real and personal creator of the
entire universe from nothing, such that the latter is neither
ible nuanced as you would expect of each: entirely a categorical matter
with respect to each's respective system).
Thanks for the information, by the way (have been gathering lots from the list
exchange of late).
Best
Jack
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.ed
-lawyers-blame-chatgpt-for-tricking-them-into-citing-bogus-legal-research/3248139/
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSC
of pragmaticism was very close to Kant's goal of a proof of his
noumena. I believe that Peirce, who had a century more experience with
science, came closer than Kant. But I would give Kant partial credit. Maybe
an A- or at least a B+.
John
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click
with many
here already. Will have reply to JAS, hopefully, within a few days which most
here should find of interest.
Best
Jack
From: John F Sowa
Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2023 6:16 AM
To: Peirce-L ; Jon Alan Schmidt
; JACK ROBERT KELLY CODY
Subject: Re
; https://global.oup.com/academic/product/peirce-on-inference-9780197689066?cc=us=en;
>
> It is scheduled to ship in July. I'd be interested in discussing the work
> when it does appear in print. Let me know if you are interested.
>
> --Jeff
> From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu
with UNSUBSCRIBE PEI
mpina Grande, Brazil),
Alan Herbert (Oxford Centre for Hindu Studies, UK) and Abbas Ahsan (University
of Birmingham, UK)
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@li
Brian Downard"
An: Kein Empfänger
Cc: "Peirce-L"
Betreff: Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Re: The Thing In Itself (Kant and Peirce - Again). (Assemblage Formalisms - inference).
Hello John, Mary, all,
I'd be happy to compare notes on Peirce's, Kant's, Leibniz's argumen
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf of Mary Libertin
Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2023 11:19 AM
To: John F Sowa
Cc: Peirce-L ; Jon Alan Schmidt
; jack.cody.2...@mumail.ie
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Re: The Thing In Itself (Kant and Peirce -
Again
ks,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 1:30 PM Jeffrey Brian Downard <
peirce-l@list.iupui.edu> wrote:
> Hello John, Mary, all,
>
&
ass without exception. CP 2.370
How do you interpret Peirce's objection to each?
--Jeff
____
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf of John F Sowa
Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2023 9:01 AM
To: Mary Libertin
Cc: Peirce-L ; Jon Alan Schmidt
; jack.cody.2...@muma
gt; Sent: 6/8/23 9:58 AM
>
> John, Peirce-list
>
> For Our Information: Oxford UP has just published a book appropriate to this
> discussion.
>
> Peirce on Inference: Validity, Strength, and the Community of Inquirers, By
> Richard Kenneth Atkins
>
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► P
the Community of Inquirers, By
Richard Kenneth Atkins
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PE
the realities
> which they represent, would not be the unknowable cause of sensation, but
> noumena or intelligible conceptions which are the last products of the mental
> action which is set in motion by sensation". [CP 8.12-13, emphasis Peirce's]
>
>
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> ► PEIRCE-L
which they
represent, would not be the unknowable cause of sensation, but noumena or
intelligible conceptions which are the last products of the mental action which
is set in motion by sensation". [CP 8.12-13, emphasis Peirce's]
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List
sses. You still have not provided a series of premisses from
which *that *conclusion follows necessarily, like I did by reformulating
and formalizing Peirce's straightforward proof that the *Ding an sich* is
nonsensical (https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2023-06/msg00016.html).
Instead, you
pt 3-8, 2023
https://sites.google.com/view/symbol-relog
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRC
a (though only proto as of now), it is not accurate to say
that the Semeiotic can account for the thing in itself except to help infer its
necessary existence, which it does.
Jack
--------
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf of Jon Alan Schmidt
Jack
as of now), it is not accurate to say
that the Semeiotic can account for the thing in itself except to help infer its
necessary existence, which it does.
Jack
____
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf of Jon Alan Schmidt
Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 10:31 PM
To: Peirce-L
S
the
chopping board and going through hundreds of thousands of words to try and find
the best means of articulation.
Best
Jack
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf of Jon Alan Schmidt
Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 10:31 PM
To: Peirce-L
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L
standing of Kant, but
> that UnknownKnown, or KnownUnknown, is something, which, experientially,
> you find in Peirce (as Peirce explaining things as they are in
> representational terms - within his schema: is it abduction? the term is
> not important to me here, but what it refers to, as it w
s can be formalized a million different ways but it never breaks.
It's the simplest - insofar as I know - means of explaining formal logic
relative to semiotic and the limitations/possibilities therein as it pertains
to the noumenal proof.
I know - as it goes - that for this to be a "proof
s not as
contradictory as it may seem.
Best
Jack
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf of Jon Alan Schmidt
Sent: Sunday, June 4, 2023 8:57 PM
To: Peirce-L
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Re: The Thing In Itself (Kant and Peirce -
Again). (
uppose, and more about advancing
the truth by hook or crook but honestly.
Best wishes,
Jack
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf of Jon Alan Schmidt
Sent: Sunday, June 4, 2023 8:57 PM
To: Peirce-L
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Re: The Thing
oy to
reach the specified end, as opposed to dictating every step along the way.
Thanks,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmi
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L
bility". So I guess, that you cannot conclude
> from an ought-matter such as representation to an is-matter, like the
> essential being of a thing.
>
> Best, Helmut
> *Gesendet:* Sonntag, 04. Juni 2023 um 09:50 Uhr
> *Von:* "JACK ROBERT KELLY CODY"
> *An:* "
've began drafting (not
> overly long as in the last essay-post and more conventional).
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Jack
>
> --
> *From:* peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu
> on behalf of Jon Alan Schmidt
> *Sent:* Sunday, June 4, 2023 3:23 A
the essential being of a thing.
Best, Helmut
Gesendet: Sonntag, 04. Juni 2023 um 09:50 Uhr
Von: "JACK ROBERT KELLY CODY"
An: "Peirce-L" , "Jon Alan Schmidt"
Betreff: Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Re: The Thing In Itself (Kant and Peirce - Again). (Asse
, represent the object as it is in itself. But
I note your post in general and there are many good pointers there insofar as
we might bring this debate forward and reach consensus one way or the other.
Thanks.
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf of Jon
as in the last essay-post and more conventional).
Thanks again.
Jack
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf of Jon Alan Schmidt
Sent: Sunday, June 4, 2023 3:23 AM
To: Peirce-L
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Re: The Thing In Itself (Kant
ey isn't
> "infinite community" but whether it is necessary to infer the existence of
> the thing in itself. For if this is necessary, then it matters not if the
> period of time be finite or infinite.
>
> And, again, I side with Peirce in the Welby exerpt. I believe it is
of this argument (primarily between JAS
and myself regarding the "thing in itself" and Kant's position within Peircean
semeiotic). The essay-lite lacks proper references, etc., in places, but I
think is sufficient to advance the debate.
Best,
Jack
____
From: pei
is a known
incognizable, ala Schopenhauer, except here I depart from Schopenhauer and
Hegel, by implication, for Schoperhauer's telos is of Hegel's Geist: overly
defined).
Best
Jack
________
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf of Jon Alan Schmidt
Sent: Sa
ith Peirce in the Welby exerpt. I believe it is necessary.
Best
Jack
________
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf of Jon Alan Schmidt
Sent: Saturday, June 3, 2023 4:01 AM
To: Peirce-L
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Re: The Thing In Itself (Kant and
; consistently in all manner of logical forms.
>
> John Sowa made a comment about the "various Peirces". I think that is
> accurate. As Peirce contradicts himself, as all people do, being fallible,
> when it comes to thing in itself for he was continuously evolving as
> scho
of possible experience, consequently to mere things of
> sense, and as soon as we leave this sphere these concepts retain no meaning
> whatever."
>
> What strikes me about this passage is the extent to which Kant and Peirce
> appear to agree about the "rule which admits of n
rious Peirces". I think that is accurate.
As Peirce contradicts himself, as all people do, being fallible, when it comes
to thing in itself for he was continuously evolving as scholar (polymath) until
his death.
Best,
Jack
____
From: peirce-l-requ...@list
is sphere these
concepts retain no meaning whatever."
What strikes me about this passage is the extent to which Kant and Peirce
appear to agree about the "rule which admits of no exception."
--Jeff
____
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf o
As it is "in itself", it can
> never be, to us, "as it is in itself".
>
> Best
>
> Jack
>
>
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should
s with feedback
> given from various quarters, be inferred to exist via the formalisms I
> employ. That is, I claim here that I have proven the core part of Kant's
> thesis whilst my own does not necessarily have to stay within the Kantian
> limits but does, as you rightly point out, have
the
"thing in itself" which by logical series and deconstruction of the mediatory
process itself, must be inferred. As it is "in itself", it can never be, to us,
"as it is in itself".
Best
Jack
________
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu
the core part of Kant's thesis whilst my own does
not necessarily have to stay within the Kantian limits but does, as you rightly
point out, have to properly situate the Kantian thesis before departing. On
that, I agree absolutely.
Best
Jack
From: peirce-l-requ...@li
ait a long back and forth as to the entire structure and premis(ses) of
> the series/argument/conclusion (as such is necessary).
>
> I will fetch a summary and argument-treatment for you, though, - thanks
> again for offering to critique.
>
> Best
>
> Jack
>
> ---
hough, - thanks again
for offering to critique.
Best
Jack
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf of Jon Alan Schmidt
Sent: Friday, June 2, 2023 6:30 PM
To: Peirce-L
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Re: The Thing In Itself (Kant and Peirce -
Again). (Assembl
ument, particularly that natural language component wherein I'll have
> to synthesize vast amounts of Hume/Kant/Hegel (and more, with Peirce
> obviously being present).
>
> Best wishes
>
> Jack
>
>
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply Lis
ck
____
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf of Jon Alan Schmidt
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2023 4:16 AM
To: Peirce-L
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Re: The Thing In Itself (Kant and Peirce -
Again). (Assemblage Formalisms - inference).
Jack, Li
ee
https://ontologforum.s3.amazonaws.com/General/EvaluatingGPT--JohnSowa-ArunMajumdar_20230531.mp4
John
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui
How much speaking did you do in
order to get ChatGPT to spin off that theory? The many sentences and phrases
in it could have been copied from various articles about the Big Bang.
John
From: "Mike Bergman"
Sent: 5/13/23 8:18 PM
To: peirce-l@list.i
Helmut, list
It wasn't what I was going for, but it is a metaphysical proof, so it will
share characteristics of arguments such as that, I suppose (thing in itself
being "noumenal").
Best
Jack
____
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf
which has to be done on my "side" if it still meets with
misunderstanding. I will go away and try to formalize more simply and more
rigorously with "value" being delineated precisely.
Best,
Jack
____
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behal
List,
I have not fully understood the proof of the thing in itself, but it seems to me, that it is formally the same or similar as Anselm of Canterbury`s proof of God. Is that so?
Best, Helmut
Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Mai 2023 um 05:16 Uhr
Von: "Jon Alan Schmidt"
An:
ries and an
> alternative. For I know not else how to go about weighing proofs or alleged
> proofs. We must disregard the terminologies of any given philosopher -
> suspend it for a time - until the logical form is dealt with and then see
> which schema, tradition, perso
ande, Brazil),
Alan Herbert (Oxford Centre for Hindu Studies, UK) and Abbas Ahsan (University
of Birmingham, UK)
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iup
.
They must be submitted by May 31, 2023, through the workshop site
(http://4wocolor.pl/#submission). Notification of acceptance will be released
on June 20, 2023. At least one author of each accepted paper must register for
the congress.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click
proceedings, which will be available during the congress. After the conference authors will be invited to submit complete papers, which will be peer-reviewed and published in a special issue of Logica Universalis (https://www.springer.com/journal/11787).
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers
pt 3-8, 2023
https://sites.google.com/view/symbol-relog
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRC
orum.org/info/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ontolog-forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to ontolog-forum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web vi
://static1.squarespace.com/static/591b1b5be4fcb5e7bff44226/t/59ee18eaec4eb75eb1231a62/1508776172008/Schnittke+Paper+New.pdf
"Chapter 7 - Stroke, music, and creative output: Alfred Schnittke and other
composers" by Yuri Zagvazdin --
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pi
o
teach using gestures and playing examples on their violin after having a stroke
may be incorrect or misleading as no historical evidence seems to back up this
claim. The descriptions provided by each assistant should be verified for
accuracy with reliable sources.
-
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L
ometric represenations.
Equations would be restricted to being in X and Y for mental represenatons of
purely planar geometrical shapes. Allowing for other parameters would allow
for 3D (and higher) shapes.
-- doug f
> Alex
>
> [1] https://s-m.ac/documents/phd_thesis_mathias_sa
to attend. Register here:
https://www.springer.com/journal/11787/updates/23910922
Jean-Yves Beziau
Editor of the journal Logica Universalis and the book series Studies in
Universal Logic
Organizer of the Logica Universalis Webinar
http://www.jyb-logic.org/
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers
---References from the note by Alex:1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxHLpb_urUk2 https://meetings.bna.org.uk/bna2023/prog/BNA2023plenaries/stanislas-dehaene/3 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S13646613220014134 https://s-m.ac/documents/phd_thesis_mathias_sable-meyer.pdf
://s-m.ac/documents/phd_thesis_mathias_sable-meyer.pdf
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@l
---
References by Alex:
1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxHLpb_urUk
2 https://meetings.bna.org.uk/bna2023/prog/BNA2023plenaries/stanislas-dehaene/
3 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364661322001413
4 https://s-m.ac/documents/phd_thesis_mathias_sable-meyer.pdf
_
s own
> “unscientific” use of the term “logic”
> <https://gnusystems.ca/TS/blr.htm#lognat> accounts for the discrepancy.
>
> Love, gary f.
>
> Coming from the ancestral lands of the Anishinaabeg
>
> From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu On
> Behalf Of Dan Everett
ements” of logic
itself) to both psychology and linguistics. Maybe Peirce’s own “unscientific”
use of the term “logic” <https://gnusystems.ca/TS/blr.htm#lognat> accounts for
the discrepancy.
Love, gary f.
Coming from the ancestral lands of the Anishinaabeg
From: peirce-l-requ...@li
ture research in cosmology and fundamental physics.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.i
For anyone interested in the idea that photographic images are not innately
perceived, but learned:
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0110225
Dan_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIR
lands of the Anishinaabeg} Owing to general causes, logic always must be far behind the practice of leading minds. [Peirce, BD ’Method’] {https://gnusystems.ca/wp/ }{ Turning Signs _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIR
tely
> proven to be beyond representational capacity. The passage argues that
> representative capacity, whether it be lexical or affective, operates
> through mediation and contiguity. It further asserts that even if
> representative capacity takes the form of mass motion (MaMo), it still
>
hing, just made up, or a supposition about something completely different from the final reconstruction? I´m just sceptical.
Best, Helmut
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2023 um 02:21 Uhr
Von: "JACK ROBERT KELLY CODY"
An: "Peirce-L" , "Jon Alan Schmidt"
Betreff:
the problem of evil
irrelevant.
Join us 5 minutes prior to the beginning of the session!
With best wishes,
Francisco de Assis Mariano
The University of Missouri-Columbia
LARA Secretary
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to RE
go through it with
Peircean lenses? (fair enough if not, it's a massive text).
Best,
Jacl
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf of Jon Alan Schmidt
Sent: Friday, May 5, 2023 10:58 PM
To: Peirce-L
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Re: The Thing In Itself
at www.languagelore.net. The expanded second
edition of his book, *The Speaking Self: Language Lore and English Usage*,
was published by Springer in 2017. His newest book, *The Logic of Language:
A Semiotic Study of Speech*, was published in 2022.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply
/logica-universalis
Jean-Yves Beziau
Editor-in-Chief Logica Universalis and LUW Organizer
http://www.jyb-logic.org/
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to pei
ion in the secondary literature. I have long considered Nathan
Houser's sketch in the introduction to EP 2 (xxxv-xxxvi) to be one of the
most promising reconstructions, and I have outlined my own attempts along
similar lines in past List threads (e.g.,
https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2022-09/msg8
to be a "proof" in the academic sense, I'd
have to go further (but I just know it is proven and have been rather lazy of
late - not very well).
Happy to let others go at it - whether to falsify or prove.
Jack
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or
ptiously in the form I give) - just to see what areas I am weak
in. For example, much of your reply here helps frame my larger "thesis" as it
were.
Anyway, I will share once it is somewhat acceptable. Thanks for the comments.
Jack.
________
From: peirce-l-requ
601 - 700 of 15226 matches
Mail list logo
