James Colannino wrote:
Hey everyone,
I've been hard at work on a new web application, and discovered
something that I would never have seen coming. I was noticing that when
I called session_start() after a few lines of includes, I was getting
complaints because the HTTP headers had already been
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 1:21 AM, James Colannino wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I've been hard at work on a new web application, and discovered
> something that I would never have seen coming. I was noticing that when
> I called session_start() after a few lines of includes, I was getting
> complaints
Hey everyone,
I've been hard at work on a new web application, and discovered
something that I would never have seen coming. I was noticing that when
I called session_start() after a few lines of includes, I was getting
complaints because the HTTP headers had already been sent out. Then,
after p
The $dom->saveHTML() function does a pretty good job of knowing what
tags are not closed - IE it does , , , etc. correctly.
Is there a way to add a tag without children to it's database?
Specifically I'm talking about the new tag from HTML 5 that is
being used to embed ogg/mp4 audio and video
Hi,
OK, I did a count on the session.inc file and there appears to be 37
variables accessed through the $_SESSION object. By and large they all
appear to be scalar variables that contain a counter or a path or a boolean.
Nothing that looks like a big object. Mostly stuff like" MaxDisplayR
HallMarc Websites wrote:
problem was solved, it was just a simple typo and sometimes all it takes is
a fresh pair of eyes. The confusing part comes in when it prints to the
screen and your mind looks in that area of the code and finds nothing
LOL - I wanted to display generated XML on scree
problem was solved, it was just a simple typo and sometimes all it
takes is
a fresh pair of eyes. The confusing part comes in when it prints to
the
screen and your mind looks in that area of the code and finds nothing
because it actually somewhere else and because it is outside of a
tag the
n module
> injecting that artifact during code fix-up phase. Run FF in safe mode
> and see if it's still there.
>
> -eric
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
> __ Info
Phpster wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 9, 2009, at 5:50 PM, Govinda wrote:
>
>> The atmosphere is weird now so you all may think I am out there. . but
>> this is a sincere question-
>> (and not due to dumb oversight of my HTML code)
>>
>> I have a mysterious "f" character (Yes, just the letter " f " )
>>
Govinda wrote:
I have a mysterious "f" character (Yes, just the letter " f " )
appearing in my HTML between these two seemingly benign HTMl tags:
On same computer, do a view source in other browsers too - IE, Chrome,
Safari etc. F still there? There could be a FireFox addon module
injec
Tony Marston wrote:
> There are too many people in this newsgroup with the idea that you MUST
> obey the rules, whatever they are, WITHOUT QUESTION. I do not subscribe to
> this notion. I have been working in IT (or DP as it was originally called)
> for over 30 years, and in that time I have wo
Just tried to do so on php-5.2.8 and php-5.3.0
All I get is
Build complete.
Don't forget to run 'make test'.
doctor.nl2k.ab.ca//usr/source/php-5.3.0$ make install
Installing PHP SAPI module: apache2handler
/var/www/build/instdso.sh SH_LIBTOOL='/var/www/build/libtool' libphp5.la
/usr/contr
??
>
>
> Govinda
> govinda.webdnat...@gmail.com
>
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
> __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
> -Original Message-
> From: tedd [mailto:tedd.sperl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 4:55 PM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net; a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Obeying the rules (was Simple login form with
> cookies)
>
> At 9:03 PM +0100 7/9/09, Ashley Sheridan
On Thursday 09 July 2009 22:00:14 Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 16:47, Bastien Koert wrote:
> >> My sincerest apologies. I have been a complete jackass this
> >> entire time and every single one of you has been correct. From this
> >> point forward I vow to keep my God damne
On Jul 9, 2009, at 5:50 PM, Govinda
wrote:
The atmosphere is weird now so you all may think I am out there. .
but this is a sincere question-
(and not due to dumb oversight of my HTML code)
I have a mysterious "f" character (Yes, just the letter " f " )
appearing in my HTML between t
The atmosphere is weird now so you all may think I am out there. . but
this is a sincere question-
(and not due to dumb oversight of my HTML code)
I have a mysterious "f" character (Yes, just the letter " f " )
appearing in my HTML between these two seemingly benign HTMl tags:
My source fil
"Still Learnin'" wrote in message
news:4a565c73.8090...@gmail.com...
> Tony Marston wrote:
>
>>> You've been told more than twice, it isn't an arbitrary rule. It isn't
>>> a petty rule. It isn't about perfection.
>>
>> It is arbitrary. It is petty. It is about someone's idea of perfection.
>
> O
This post did not come from me. The headers contain this:
Received: from [74.54.247.2] ([74.54.247.2:59280]
helo=mail.caracol-cream.com)
Very funny.
--
(the real) Tony Marston
http://www.tonymarston.net
http://www.radicore.org
""(the fake) Tony Marston"" wrote in message
news:e1mp00d-0005iz
Hello. I have this code and the getFrame returns a GD truecolor image.
However, I want to convert to imagemagick after I get that frame from
ffmpeg.
Here's my code:
// GRAB A FRAME FROM THE VIDEO FOR A THUMB VIEW
$video = new ffmpeg_movie($data_temp, false);
$frame = $video->getFrame(90); //ret
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 16:47, Bastien Koert wrote:
>>
>> My sincerest apologies. I have been a complete jackass this entire
>> time and every single one of you has been correct. From this point
>> forward I vow to keep my God damned mouth shut unless spoken to.
Heh. Methinks there be
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 16:55, tedd wrote:
>
> Now, do I remember email? No not really. As I understand it, email came
> about under ARPANET and converted to the Internet in the early 80's. So
> unless he has been doing email and participating on something other than
> what's known, I would have to
At 9:03 PM +0100 7/9/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
Also, I'd hardly call anyone here a jumped-up pipsqueak just because we aren't
too old to go by new rules. The only reason I'm bringing your age into this
is because you keep mentioning your last "30 years" online on mailing lists.
There are older m
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Tony
Marston wrote:
>
>
> My sincerest apologies. I have been a complete jackass this entire
> time and every single one of you has been correct. From this point
> forward I vow to keep my God damned mouth shut unless spoken to.
>
> You see, I have be
My sincerest apologies. I have been a complete jackass this entire
time and every single one of you has been correct. From this point
forward I vow to keep my God damned mouth shut unless spoken to.
You see, I have been struggling with defining my sexual identity
and trying to
Tony Marston wrote:
You've been told more than twice, it isn't an arbitrary rule. It isn't
a petty rule. It isn't about perfection.
It is arbitrary. It is petty. It is about someone's idea of perfection.
One of us clearly manifests a reality gap. How many people do you
have siding with your
"Still Learnin'" wrote in message
news:4a5641d1.9040...@gmail.com...
> Tony Marston wrote:
>
>> I have no respect for anyone who wastes time in trying to force others to
>> obey their petty rules.
>
> ...
>> The whole point about this particlar rule is that it has no purpose other
>> than to f
On Thursday 09 July 2009 20:50:59 Tony Marston wrote:
> ""Bob McConnell"" wrote in message
> news:ff8482a96323694490c194babeac24a0049ad...@email.cbord.com...
> From: HallMarc Websites
>
> >> Having just come in to the particular thread, I actually have work
>
> that
>
> >> keeps me away from here,
"tedd" wrote in message
news:p06240800c67be78e3...@[192.168.1.101]...
> At 2:22 PM -0400 7/9/09, HallMarc Websites wrote:
>> As far as anyone going against convention,
>>seems to me that people who think outside the box, go against convention,
>>break the rules, whatever are the ones who keep l
""Bob McConnell"" wrote in message
news:ff8482a96323694490c194babeac24a0049ad...@email.cbord.com...
From: HallMarc Websites
>>
>> Having just come in to the particular thread, I actually have work
that
>> keeps me away from here, I'm wondering why this is worth the energy
and time
>> I have seen
Hi all
I haven't read any post from here.
I want to read PHP threads.
is this going somewhere? I think not.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 4:13 PM, tedd wrote:
> At 2:38 PM -0400 7/9/09, Bob McConnell wrote:
>>
>> It will be even more interesting to see if anyone on this list pays any
>> attention to h
At 2:38 PM -0400 7/9/09, Bob McConnell wrote:
It will be even more interesting to see if anyone on this list pays any
attention to him in the future.
Bob McConnell
Bob:
You won't have to wonder about me. I've already set email filters to
trash any incoming from him.
A *few* on this list d
At 2:22 PM -0400 7/9/09, HallMarc Websites wrote:
As far as anyone going against convention,
seems to me that people who think outside the box, go against convention,
break the rules, whatever are the ones who keep life interesting and
occasionally help us find something new. I would hate to liv
From: HallMarc Websites
>
> Having just come in to the particular thread, I actually have work
that
> keeps me away from here, I'm wondering why this is worth the energy
and time
> I have seen wasted on this subject. Seems to me everyone needs to take
a
> deep breath and a step back. As far as an
"Ashley Sheridan" wrote in message
news:1247162816.3514.17.ca...@localhost.localdomain...
> On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 16:57 +0100, Tony Marston wrote:
>> It's stupid because there is no valid reason as to why top posting is
>> *bad*.
>> It has existed on the internet ever since there was an internet
; People
> often come here knowing little of PHP, and making their lives more
> difficult by having threads that follow no logical convention is just
> rude and inconsiderate.
>
> Thanks
> Ash
> www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
>
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http:/
Tony Marston wrote:
I have no respect for anyone who wastes time in trying to force others to
obey their petty rules.
...
The whole point about this particlar rule is that it has no purpose other
than to force everybody to conform to somebody's idea of perfection.
You've been told more than
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 16:57 +0100, Tony Marston wrote:
> It's stupid because there is no valid reason as to why top posting is
> *bad*.
> It has existed on the internet ever since there was an internet, so
> for
> someone to stand up and say "I don't like this, so I'll make a rule
> agains
> it"
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:57, Tony Marston wrote:
>
> Violating a license agreement is against the law, top posting is not.
Laws are rules set forth by mortal man. I have the right by your
own word to choose not to obey this particular one.
Your arguments hold no water, your experience h
At 7:30 PM -0400 7/8/09, D.M.Jackson wrote:
Thanks guys. I was just wondering if it was common practice to pass all
those variables in the SESSION object or if I was following a bad example
because it was the first time that I had seen so many variables passed this
way. If this is the typical w
"Daniel Brown" wrote in message
news:ab5568160907090729j4c2cc67esff2823dcb493d...@mail.gmail.com...
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 09:54, Tony Marston
> wrote:
>>
>> I called him "intolerant" because he jumps on issues which other people
>> just
>> don't care about.
>
>Point #1: You're obviously
[snip]
No, I don't like stupid rules, which is why I choose not to obey them.
[/snip]
Shall I point out the irony here?
http://www.tonymarston.net/aboutme/experiences.html in which you post a
truckload of rules.
And this which is posted among your Thoughts & Words
Nobody trips over mountains.
[snip]
I've decided. It doesn't work for me. End of story.
[/snip]
This has become way off topic (call me a Nazi if you will :)) and has
not, until now, been appropriately marked in the subject line.
Mr. Marston has posted here for a long time and has always had a burr up
his butt about rules. Se
At 9:39 AM +0100 7/9/09, Tony Marston wrote:
-snip- (Nothing important)
While you don't have any regard for "rules", we do. We simply ask
that the rules be followed for reasons that are not without
foundation and rules that are customary for list such as this.
Your juvenile statement of:
"N
"Bastien Koert" wrote in message
news:d7b6cab70907090705i1575fe0ft21a2cc82c992b...@mail.gmail.com...
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Tony
> Marston wrote:
>>
>> "Bastien Koert" wrote in message
>> news:d7b6cab70907090623s6b37641dt90a564f1d80fe...@mail.gmail.com...
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:
>-Original Message-
>From: Bob McConnell [mailto:r...@cbord.com]
>Sent: 09 July 2009 15:38
>To: php-general@lists.php.net
>Subject: RE: [PHP] Obeying the rules (was Simple login form with cookies)
>
[snip]
>
>Bob McConnell
>
>A: Maybe because some people are too annoyed by top-posting.
>Q:
"Eddie Drapkin" wrote in message
news:68de37340907090705y5b095f8cy68ba0d416b045...@mail.gmail.com...
>> I called him "intolerant" because he jumps on issues which other people
>> just
>> don't care about.
>>
>> I called him "small minded" because he concentrates on small issues which
>> simply
A quick search on Google indicates this argument has been active in
various forums for over ten years, so I don't expect it to be resolved
here.
While ego is the most apparent motivator in these discussions I suspect,
but have no way to confirm, that the two camps are divided by how their
[email|n
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 09:54, Tony Marston wrote:
>
> I called him "intolerant" because he jumps on issues which other people just
> don't care about.
Point #1: You're obviously wrong, as this thread has already
received more replies than most on-topic, PHP-centric threads.
> I called him "sm
my 2¢:
Wherever/whenever the feeling level has been damaged, then/there
communication stops.
We can easily forget this in the dry environment of talking to
computers.. but the important matter(s) will always come back to the
*people* involved, sooner or later.
Real power is measured in ter
Tony Marston wrote:
I called [Daniel] "intolerant" because he jumps on issues which other
people just don't care about.
By "other people" you can only mean yourself, since the number of
people disagreeing with you here on this list keeps increasing.
I called him "small minded" because he conc
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Tony
Marston wrote:
>
> "Bastien Koert" wrote in message
> news:d7b6cab70907090623s6b37641dt90a564f1d80fe...@mail.gmail.com...
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Tony
> Marston wrote:
>>
>> "Stuart" wrote in message
>> news:a5f019de0907090340k47216f7fh4d83434ef98ce.
> I called him "intolerant" because he jumps on issues which other people just
> don't care about.
>
> I called him "small minded" because he concentrates on small issues which
> simply don't matter in the great scheme of things. That sounds like fair
> comment to me It's just like those people who
"Bastien Koert" wrote in message
news:d7b6cab70907090623s6b37641dt90a564f1d80fe...@mail.gmail.com...
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Tony
Marston wrote:
>
> "Stuart" wrote in message
> news:a5f019de0907090340k47216f7fh4d83434ef98ce...@mail.gmail.com...
>> 2009/7/9 Tony Marston :
>>
>> The firs
I honestly think this is a case of the subject being broached in a
less-than-super-friendly-with-hugs-and-butterflies way and someone
getting unduly offended about that. Why not chill out and look at
this objectively? Mailing lists are historically, as I'm sure you
know, a nearly invaluable resea
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Tony
Marston wrote:
>
> "Stuart" wrote in message
> news:a5f019de0907090340k47216f7fh4d83434ef98ce...@mail.gmail.com...
> 2009/7/9 Tony Marston :
>
>> I thought of a better analogy. You ever been on the London
>> Underground? There's a rule that says you stand on t
"Stuart" wrote in message
news:a5f019de0907090340k47216f7fh4d83434ef98ce...@mail.gmail.com...
2009/7/9 Tony Marston :
> I thought of a better analogy. You ever been on the London
> Underground? There's a rule that says you stand on the right-hand side
> of escalators. This has no benefit to you
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
>
> Sounds a lot like glusterfs. http://www.gluster.org/
yep, it is similar, except I am not aiming to be all that comprehensive of
a file system. I really want to create something extremely robust, that can
be used in web apps and that will
2009/7/9 Tony Marston :
> Sometimes I use bottom posting, sometimes I use top posting, and sometimes I
> use middle posting. It depends on the circumstances. If a post contains
> several points that need separate responses, then I put my response under
> each point, and do not accumulate all at th
Tony Marston wrote:
Where I put my answers depends on the context, so saying that IT MUST ALWAYS
BE AT THE BOTTOM doesn't wash with me.
That is a sentiment I would agree with - but for one flaw!
The number of people who seem to think that answering with a single line
at the top and then includ
Sometimes I use bottom posting, sometimes I use top posting, and sometimes I
use middle posting. It depends on the circumstances. If a post contains
several points that need separate responses, then I put my response under
each point, and do not accumulate all at the bottom as this would make i
2009/7/9 Tony Marston :
> There are too many people in this newsgroup with the idea that you MUST
> obey the rules, whatever they are, WITHOUT QUESTION. I do not subscribe to
> this notion. I have been working in IT (or DP as it was originally called)
> for over 30 years, and in that time I have w
On Thursday 09 July 2009 09:39:11 Tony Marston wrote:
> There are too many people in this newsgroup with the idea that you MUST
> obey the rules, whatever they are, WITHOUT QUESTION. I do not subscribe to
> this notion. I have been working in IT (or DP as it was originally called)
> for over 30 ye
There are too many people in this newsgroup with the idea that you MUST
obey the rules, whatever they are, WITHOUT QUESTION. I do not subscribe to
this notion. I have been working in IT (or DP as it was originally called)
for over 30 years, and in that time I have worked with many groups, and e
Shane Hill wrote:
> hi folks,
>
> I am on a couple of php lists and on one of them we were having a
> discussion about scalable enterprise class systems to store images for
> things like user photo and file uploads, etc. and whether or not
> something existed in php to facilitate this. well the
65 matches
Mail list logo
