Alexander Burger wrote:
The normal use, however, writing applications in Lisp, is surely OK.
Then you can distribute the PicoLisp interpreter as you like, in binary
or source form (I'm not sure, but probly it is even sufficient to
provide the customer with a link where he can download the
Some things you don't bring from Windows. Then you bring Unix to Windows
instead.
There is a market for it, or Cygwin nor Services For Unix would not exist.
(Services For Unix being Microsofts strange name for their Cygwin-like
offering.)
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 04:32:07PM +0200, Henrik
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 08:29:52AM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
Hi all,
as this discussion popped up recently and in the past, and will surely
pop up in the future: What do you think if PicoLisp were released under
the BSD license instead of GPL?
I would love it. I could imagine embedding
Totally awesome!
I have for a long time wanted Picolisp on other platforms. I think the
best thing about Picolisp is the language itself, not its current libraries.
Thank you!
// Jakob
On 10/04/2010 09:40 AM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
Hi Alex,
I have published my implementation of picolisp in
On 10/06/2010 10:04 PM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
Hi Alex,
Perhaps 'fork' can be simulated by copying all runtime variables to a
thread?
not sure whether that's enough. The semantics is completely different,
what about open files and so on? Is it necessary to go that far in
terms of
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 07:07:01PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
Hi all,
the Java version of PicoLisp, which is part of the testing release since
a few weeks, is now in a state where I dare to say that the language is
usable (just the plain language).
Very cool!
In the near future I
On 11/05/2010 10:56 AM, Alexander Burger wrote:
Too bad. Is there no up-to-date JRE available for the Mac?
Should be:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2315116tstart=1
http://www.piranhamethod.com/2010/04/installing-jre-1-6-on-your-mac-os-x-leopard-10-5-8-or-later/
// Jakob
On 11/12/2010 08:04 PM, Alexander Burger wrote:
[...]
Done! I do now consider Ersatz PicoLisp complete :)
Totally cool! I consider the main benefit that we have a PicoLisp in
Java, which we need to be hype compliant. :)
// Jakob
--
UNSUBSCRIBE:
On 11/17/2010 06:13 PM, Alexander Burger wrote:
But more important is that this would require quite a mess of code,
analog to what is there for getting the values of public fields. If you
look at lines 99 through 142 of ersatz/fun.src (actual version), you
see a lot of tedious type
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 09:00:04AM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote:
Hi Tomas,
Why does your code
(java Label 'addMouseListener
(interface java.awt.event.MouseListener
'mouseClicked '((Ev) (setq Dir (if (= 1 Dir) 12 1)))
'mouseEntered nil
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 08:31:43AM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote:
So, again, thanks to you all for the support! I don't have to defend
that design decision in the future again! :)
With new users, this will come up over and over again.
But now there is sort of a FAQ to point to.
// Jakob
--
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 05:17:10PM +0100, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
It's not that bad, but it could be better documented.
Here is what I could find:
http://orangejuiceliberationfront.com/intel-assembler-on-mac-os-x/
And this:
http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/DeveloperTools
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 09:57:06AM +0800, Edwin Eyan Moragas wrote:
Hi List,
what's the best way to go about autogenerated keys for Pilog? i've
been digging around a bit and can't find anything related.
hints and pointers would be most appreciated. thank you.
Hi!
I have copied your
Wow! This is amazing!
Great work. I have asked before, but forgot the answer. Is what we like
to call
64-bit picolisp also portable to 32-bit CPUs?
Or would it take a kludge of some sort?
best regards,
Jakob
On 4/27/11 1:02 PM, Alexander Burger wrote:
Hi all,
64-bit PicoLisp now also
Alexander, do you have the sources for 68000 PicoLisp, and if you do, is
it anything like current PicoLisp?
The reason why I am asking is that I am somewhat involved in an Amiga
clone (Natami) which has its own CPU implementation, and I was going to
use miniPicoLisp on it, but then remembered
I ported miniPicolisp to Amiga with GCC. I had to fix one include and
change to a cross compiler in the makefile. However, -falign-functions
did not exist in that version of GCC. And sure enough, while it built,
it would not run, dying on the assertion giveup(Unaligned Function);.
Any ideas? Why
On 6/9/11 10:50 AM, dexen deVries wrote:
Any ideas? Why does alignment matter?
Not sure if it'll help at all, but there has been a similar discussion in the
past:
http://www.mail-archive.com/picolisp@software-lab.de/msg01909.html
Thank you! Now that I looked at that discussion, I seem to
I thougt PicoLisp used its' own assembler?
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:24:05AM +0200, Jon Kleiser wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to look at the old problem of building 64-bit PicoLisp on Mac OS
X. Assemblers are far from what I usually play with, but at least I'd like
to spend a few hours today on
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6571200/pilog-assertion
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 12:26:46AM -0700, Doug Snead wrote:
Consider these five pilog assertions.
(be do ((Question @P) @S @S) (holds @P @S))
(be holds (@A @S)
(restoreSitArg @A @S @F)
(2 cons (- @F)))
(be On (3 s0))
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 03:33:03PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
Yeah, I always felt that Ersatz (or Java in general) is not the right
thing.
It's perfect for bootstrapping. That it is.
// Jakob
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 09:58:59AM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
Hi all,
let me share my funny experiences about the PicoLisp Ticker, and how it
is handled by Mr. Google:
http://picolisp.com/5000/-2-1i.html
Put a link back to picolisp.com on each ticker page. There are pretty
good
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:45:28AM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
Hi Dexen,
may I suggest adding rel=nofollow to the `Next page' link (the a tag)?
I see! Didn't know about that tag.
Any opinions? Should we relieve the busy bot? Or should we wait to see
what happens? Will Google ban the
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:22:29PM +0700, Henrik Sarvell wrote:
Trying to compile with 32bit libc libraries installed gives me the following:
...
gcc -m32 -o ../bin/ssl ssl.o -lssl -lcrypto
snip
I have installed every possible libssl and libssl-dev package but still no
luck, what am I doing
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 08:25:05PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
Ah, one important point: Can we be sure that OpenBSD uses the ELF linker
format? If not (e.g. the old a.out format), we might have problems
similar to those on Mac OS.
Yes:
http://www.phiral.net/openbsdasm.htm
I don't
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:58:20PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
Hmm, looking at that, it occurs to me that the order of arguments to
'gcc' might be relevant: If it first processes -ldl, and _then_
x86-64.linux.base.o, it might be too late to detect that certain
functions from the library
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 07:13:08AM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
Yes. Unfortunately we couldn't solve the problem with fcntl(), even
under cygwin (don't know if the situation would be better today).
But I'm afraid that there will be many other problems. Especially
select(), fork() and
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 16:42:22 +0700, Henrik Sarvell hsarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm sorry to have to say this but these people are only real
programmers
if they don't target the MS stack with .NET etc, the whole WAMP, XAMPP
posse
are just hobbyists and not a iota of energy should be spent
As seen here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_transactional_memory
I noticed that Common Lisp and other Lisps have support for transactional
memory.
I read this and became curious:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 03:57:49PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 03:04:21PM +0200, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
ATM I cannot see how this could be useful. PicoLisp has no threads, and
If you defined threads less strict, such that processes could be
threads,
could
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 02:51:32PM +0700, Henrik Sarvell wrote:
Having to write the full name all the time could easily become comical, as in
my above Clojure example. This is also one of the reasons I have leaned
towards
+1
Imagine all the rants which could be made about code full of both
On January 13, 2012 at 12:45 PM Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote:
As Henrik also wrote, nobody wants to reinvent the wheel. Very true. The
intention of PicoLisp is to _avoid_ writing extensive libraries, and
rather use existing libs implemented in other languages. For that,
On January 13, 2012 at 5:49 PM Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote:
As I see it, the problem of acceptance lies on a deeper level:
- Non-Lisp programmers don't like PicoLisp, _because_ it is Lisp.
Too many parentheses, and similar nonsense. Too different for
them.
On January 23, 2012 at 2:02 PM Jon Kleiser jon.klei...@usit.uio.no wrote:
I like having the possibility to make use of Java solutions (e.g. the
Swing GUI) from Ersatz PicoLisp, but please don't tell anyone that it
allows you to integrate with any legacy system before we have done any
Dear PicoLisp interested subscribers!
Sometimes people ask questions here on the mailing list about PicoLisp
programming.
Given recent discussions, I have a suggestion:
Let us all get StackOverflow accounts. (I have one.)
Then, we post to this list look at this StackOverflow link - I
On January 26, 2012 at 1:34 AM Alex Gilding alex.gild...@talktalk.net wrote:
2) Related to that, the download page describes miniPicoLisp as pure
PicoLisp, supporting the full language. Is there any kind of
established definition of what specifically constitutes the PicoLisp
Good
On January 28, 2012 at 1:18 PM Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote:
Hello Joe,
I'm trying to write a simple java web server using the simpleframework.
I'm
close, but I process anything in the method handler:
And this excellent discussion is why we could say that we have
On January 28, 2012 at 10:25 AM Henrik Sarvell hsarv...@gmail.com wrote:
OK so I've got a first draft of something simple.
As opposed to what has been requested before this is NOT a web
development framework in the sense of RoR or even Ring.
But a very nice start! :-D
//Jakob
--
On January 30, 2012 at 3:50 PM Joe Bogner joebog...@gmail.com wrote:
I spent the weekend working on an example web app using ersatz. I've
written it up here: http://picolisp.com/5000/!wiki?ErsatzWebApp
Please let me know what you think
Awesome. I will bless it with the first bug report!
On January 31, 2012 at 11:19 AM Joe Bogner joebog...@gmail.com wrote:
worried about the security of it. Maybe if I were to pick a single
mimetype, I'd go with zip or tar.gz as that's the main reason someone
would upload if it's too much to paste in as a code example or to
include a
Hello!
Suggestion: put prominently on the picolisp.com site two things:
How to sign up to this mailing list,
and
if you ask a question on Stackoverflow and put the picolisp tag on the
question,
we have people monitoring there for new picolisp questions
best regards,
Jakob
--
On February 28, 2012 at 11:26 AM Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote:
Wouldn't be the Android porting project a good candidate for the Summer
of Code?
Indeed it would. I would also like to see a port to VHDL or Verilog. A
proof
of concept PicoLisp web server running its own
On March 3, 2012 at 10:27 PM José Romero jose.cyb...@gmail.com wrote:
Things left to design are how to keep track of sessions. Picolisp's
persistent process system is simple and very efficient, but there
should be a filesystem fallback for CGI. It would be also very
desirable to make the
On March 3, 2012 at 11:56 PM Joe Bogner joebog...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess for someone with no knowledge of picoLisp, as it relates to
your proposal, why is picoLisp a good choice for web development? What
would the successful completion of the proposal enable? I have some
perspective but
On March 4, 2012 at 1:07 AM José Romero jose.cyb...@gmail.com wrote:
One thing I love about picolisp is it's interactivity, I can interact
with a running app using the repl (and the wonderful 'edit function).
The equivalence of code and data and dynamic binding help a lot to
alter the
On March 5, 2012 at 8:49 AM Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote:
This sounds useful. I don't know about the types of restrictions which
might be imposed by such servers.
It is often that you may run only a PHP script or a CGI. And the CGI
can be either compiled static binary or
On March 6, 2012 at 4:10 PM Jon Kleiser jon.klei...@usit.uio.no wrote:
JavaScript, so one could rip off all (or most of) the assembly code that
64-bits PL is written in? It seems like it could be a fun thing to do,
at least for those who have some time available ... ;-)
I think it's a
On March 7, 2012 at 8:30 AM Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote:
Hi Jon,
How many percent (very roughly) of the PicoLisp functions are depending on
this 'native' function? If it's less than say 10%, one could probably find
an alternative solution for these natives, or just
On April 23, 2012 at 10:08 AM Thorsten quintf...@googlemail.com wrote:
I knew something was wrong when I pasted the link, since there was a
long discussiion about PicoLisp links here not so long ago - but it was
already quite late when I posted so I did not investigate. Thanks for
the tip.
On April 23, 2012 at 11:41 AM Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote:
Hi Jakob,
Which is not as it should be. Links should be linkable.
Not necessarily. A login session is by definition an ephemeral
situation, so its momentary state should better not be linkable.
I regard this as
Our Schwerpunkt could be that elusive web IDE which can be deployed on free
CGI hosting and scale upwards.
:)
best regards,
Jakob
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
On May 9, 2012 at 3:33 PM Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote:
Does anybody know of a programming language with an equally powerful --
yet as simple -- C function interface? Except C/C++ of course ;-)
I think D has it. (D is pretty nice, it looks like C++ except the evil.)
best
On May 29, 2012 at 2:04 PM Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote:
I've posted a bug report, asking for the upgrade, in the middle of
March:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/picolisp/+bug/956731
The report mentions that the bug is filed against Ubuntu in general and not
I am not sure, but I suspect that the easiest way to get this fixed in Ubuntu
12.04 is create a point release for 3.0.8.10,
for instance replacing 3.0.8.10-1 with 3.0.8.10-2 or something, with a minimal
fix which only fixes the dynamic loader issue.
Now, I don't know the differences between
On May 29, 2012 at 4:34 PM Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote:
So let's wait a little if the upgrade will happen now as the bug is
finally confirmed.
No, I am pretty sure that is not affecting it at all.
I think you as the bug reporter need to do what the janitor code said:
To
Great initiative!
I will try to put something short together on how portable the
very core of (mini)PicoLisp is. No promise though, but it would be fun.
best regards,
Jakob
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Awesome
Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@googlemail.com skrev:
Hi List,
I just published a new GNU Emacs major mode for editing files with the
PicoLisp-Wiki syntax. You can either clone the gitrepo or download the
el file here:
,---
|
Talk about fast vendor response time!
On September 5, 2012 at 9:34 AM Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote:
Opps, I can reproduce it! And I found this is a bug in the 'dir'
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
On November 9, 2012 at 6:13 PM Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote:
[read changes]
Any objections?
On the contrary! Not that I am a daily PicoLisp user these days, but I
remember stumbling over that once and being confused.
The proposed behavior is better.
best regards,
Jakob
--
Plain awesome. So short!
I feel we are getting closer to where PicoLisp could be used in Java for real.
This is so awesome, getting access to all Java libraries etc from PicoLisp :)
PԔ � j)mX��� ��zV�u�.n7�
Yes, the FAQ should definitely elaborate on that, since people are used to
that interpreted languages can not induce segfaults on their own. Also explain
perhaps that the interpreter could check all C calls against a white list, but
it would take a lot of time
Alexander Burger
Wow, I just have to comment this. Amiga + picolisp in the same post = awesome.
/me crawls back under rock
On May 20, 2013 at 11:13 PM Jorge Acereda Maciá jacer...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I can only say that under AmigaOS it would certainly be a no-no:
--
UNSUBSCRIBE:
so good to you see activity this early in the weekend. :)
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
On September 16, 2013 at 9:30 AM Tomas Hlavaty t...@logand.com wrote:
3) I guess most of the overhead of the http request is probably
establishing the connection. My bett is that it doesn't really
matter if you send 1kB or 5kB of data. For example, if I run this
It might matter,
Bikeshedding! Debian.
Henrik Sarvell hsarv...@gmail.com skrev:
If VM can't be avoided isn't Gentoo more minimal than Arch?
http://www.gentoo.org/
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com wrote:
Mansur Mamkin mmam...@mail.ru writes:
in case of Windows don't forget
Well, if PicoLisp was ported to
http://zerovm.org/wiki/The_Cloud_Hypervisor
then we'd definitely be there.
Thing is, I think it might be a good fit!
On 2013-10-24 06:23, Henrik Sarvell wrote:
This guy has obviously not discovered PicoLisp yet :-)
If it is derivative, you should ask.
On April 11, 2014 7:07:25 PM CEST, Henrik Sarvell hsarv...@gmail.com wrote:
I feel like I have changed the original now to such an extent that I
don't
have to ask anymore :-) It feels like a derivative work.
However, attribution is kept in the source:
And this is an excellent example of PicoLisp going the extra mile. Instead of
handling C as the lowest abstraction, going to the actual machine. I imagine
other interpreted languages could be faster if designed with this attention to
detail.
On 12 maj 2014 08:24:13 CEST, Alexander Burger
Heartbleed vs custom memory allocator is a false dichotomy. The problem with
OpenSSL was a bad development model. A security library should have a
development model focusing on security. Security is a process and taking
responsibility for design decisions and committing to them, not letting
On May 14, 2014 at 4:03 PM andr...@itship.ch wrote:
PicoLisp can and might be used to implement security applications.
Of course.
So better use standard proved OS mechanisms and have some more initial
effort to get it running, I think.
The standard proved OS mechanism are all different
Yes, but it would help if the allocator cleared returned memory if I recall
correctly.
On May 14, 2014 6:40:59 PM CEST, Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote:
Hi Jakob,
Veering off topic here ...
...
The heartbleed bug wouldn't have had such a devastating effect if
they
wouldn't
Maybe not with Emscripten.
On August 28, 2014 7:41:12 PM CEST, Mike Pechkin mike.pech...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
Is it hard to implement minimalist version of minipicolisp in browser ?
Like http://tryclj.com/ ?
Mike
--
Skickat från min Android-telefon med K-9 E-post. Ursäkta min fåordighet.
Fantastic, this is truly great. I have been hoping for years
someone would pull this off.
Congratulations.
best regards,
Jakob
On September 19, 2014 at 1:39 PM Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote:
Hello List,
we are proud to announce PilMCU, the Lisp Machine on a Chip! :)
We,
On September 19, 2014 at 3:18 PM Joe Bogner joebog...@gmail.com wrote:
This might be off base, but is it within the realm of possibility to
run PilMCU on a raspberry pi now or in the future? That's an accessible
piece of hardware that many people already have (myself included). These
people
On September 19, 2014 at 7:32 PM Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com wrote:
Loyall, David david.loy...@nebraska.gov
writes:
The Internet would like to run this locally. Would you post the
verilog source and build files? Or a link to a repository?
I think this has the potential to make a
Maybe Alex could for a price?
On September 25, 2014 5:54:02 PM CEST, jerome moliere jer...@javaxpert.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I think that everything is in the title...
Do you know if someone supplies such training ?
Kind regards
--
J.MOLIERE - Mentor/J
--
Skickat från min Android-telefon med K-9
Great to read on pilmcu and other updates!
On October 8, 2014 at 8:23 AM Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote:
But I feel that it doesn't make sense except for miniPicoLisp. By doing
so, you save a few hundred kilobytes in RAM at most, but get the
disadvantages of a less flexible
someone registered that domain for PicoLisp, then did not renew the fee.
When it was expired, the domain was snatched (like most expired domains are)
by one of these companies which do nothing else but buy expired domains and
resell them.
The boilerplate text is just random junk to keep the page
On October 27, 2014 at 10:20 AM Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote:
Hi Jakob,
our mails just crossed ;-)
someone registered that domain for PicoLisp, then did not renew the fee.
Yes, javuchi messed it up somehow, but it may not be only his fault. It
seems to be possible that
On November 25, 2014 at 11:19 AM Kuba Tyszko k...@lbl.pl wrote:
is this actually the whole picolisp converted somehow to a dedicated CPU
running on FPGA, or is that an actual CPU emulated (say some kind of ARM),
and picolisp compiled for that CPU ?
It is a new CPU.
I'm just trying to
On December 11, 2014 at 3:39 PM Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote:
Hi Jon,
(dm T (X Y) (=: x X) (=: y Y))
and then repeat the last line, then Ersatz will say # T +Shape
redefined, but 32-bit PicoLisp will give no such redefined warning. It
may not matter very much, I just
Merry Christmas to you too :-)
On December 24, 2014 9:37:30 AM CET, Mattias Sundblad mattias@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to wish everyone on the list a merry christmas and a happy new
year. Learning Picolisp is a great and fun challenge for me at least
and
I'm looking forward to
Interesting development you have there, connecting the JVM to PicoLisp
proper.
Which makes me wonder about Ersatz PicoLisp though.
How would it stand against other JVM alternatives? I know that Ersatz is
not as
fast as native PicoLisp. But for instance Groovy, is really slow on the JVM.
Maybe
On 02/02/15 15:50, Alexander Burger wrote:
Hi Jakob,
Which makes me wonder about Ersatz PicoLisp though.
How would it stand against other JVM alternatives? I know that Ersatz is
not as
fast as native PicoLisp. But for instance Groovy, is really slow on the JVM.
Maybe Ersatz would be fast
It's a really good example.
On January 12, 2015 8:34:08 AM CET, Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de
wrote:
Hi all,
perhaps this is useful:
A Minimal PicoLisp DB/GUI Application
http://picolisp.com/wiki/?minDbGui
♪♫ Alex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE:
Even if that were so, couldn't we fix this with a convention in the module
loader? That is, the loader concatenates all files into one upon loading.
Is this crazy talk?
On February 10, 2015 9:47:54 AM CET, andr...@itship.ch wrote:
Hi Lawrence
Nice you're taking part here!
You're basically
Could we cook up a convention?
On February 9, 2015 6:12:17 PM CET, Henrik Sarvell hsarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Lawrence, if you're talking about something like Ruby's gems, then
no.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Lawrence Bottorff borg...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm wondering what you offer in lieu
Fair enough!
Whatever works best for you is for the best.
On March 17, 2015 7:34:09 AM CET, Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote:
Hi Jon, hi all!
I'm very sorry, but from now on I won't support any repo for PicoLisp.
As ever, the most up-to-date version can be downloaded from
Congratulations!
On March 12, 2015 7:29:02 PM CET, Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote:
Hello list,
let me announce 7fach BlitzMenu, our first attempt for a public
application since 9 years :)
It is for gastronomers, restaurants or canteens, to maintain their
dishes and beverages in
Github.com is really nice.
On March 13, 2015 9:02:10 AM CET, Jon Kleiser jon.klei...@fsat.no wrote:
Hi,
It looks like PicoLisp will have to move from Google Code:
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/03/google-to-close-google-code-open-source-project-hosting/
Maybe GitHub could
Github.com is more than a repo, it's a community of developers.
On March 13, 2015 12:56:32 PM CET, Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de
wrote:
Hi all,
Alea iacta est :)
Mike Pechkin has set up a repo at bitbucket. More next week.
♪♫ Alex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE:
And github.com has like, what, 1000 times more developers.
:-)
On March 13, 2015 4:32:05 PM CET, Alexander Williams a...@unscramble.co.jp
wrote:
Everyone's comments are valid, but we need to remember:
For PicoLisp's user base to grow, lowering barriers to entry should be
the
first priority.
Yep.
Definitely interesting.
On 03/03/15 18:50, Joe Bogner wrote:
Nicely done. Thanks for sharing
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Henrik Sarvell hsarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice!
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Alexander Williams
a...@unscramble.co.jp wrote:
Hi list,
Some of you
You are not by any chance on a Sparc platform?
On 03/03/15 20:57, Rick Hanson wrote:
Sorry in advance if you’ve already covered this issue in the past.
I’m on Solaris 10; I can build the 32-bit picolisp (3.1.9) with no problem.
Then, I go do a (cd src64; make) (which is GNU make btw);
to be thrown into burning inferno where they belong, and I'll go
live in a box down my the river. :) Thanks!
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Jakob Eriksson ja...@aurorasystems.eu
wrote:
You are not by any chance on a Sparc platform?
On 03/03/15 20:57, Rick Hanson wrote:
Sorry in advance
Good initiative - the more ways to connect, the better, IMHO.
On 26/04/15 23:00, Henrik Sarvell wrote:
Hi list, I'm announcing this at a very early stage, earlier than I
would like to, in case someone else is also thinking about doing a
MySQL wrapper, to avoid duplicate work.
I'm not doing
Interesting. Is the server a Windows server or Linux?
On 14/04/15 14:19, Mansur Mamkin wrote:
Hi all!
I'm happy to announce a litle article:
Installing local wiki with Kerberos authentication
http://picolisp.com/wiki/?localwikikerberos
Best regards,
Mansur Mamkin
--
UNSUBSCRIBE:
Thank you!
On 19/06/15 22:16, Alexander Burger wrote:
Hi all,
I'm happy to announce PilOS - The PicoLisp Operating System!
It is a modification of the infamous PilMCU, which unfortunately doesn't
seem to get off the ground. So in order not to have wasted all that
effort, I decided to
This is great!
On 17/06/15 17:48, Christophe Gragnic wrote:
Hi list.
They even spelled it correctly !
https://github.com/github/linguist/pull/2449#issuecomment-112829159
See one of your repos or this one:
https://github.com/Microalg/Microalg
chri
--
UNSUBSCRIBE:
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
