W dniu poniedziałek, 3 lipca 2017 21:50:38 UTC+2 użytkownik Cranix napisał:
> Hello,
> I'm using latest qubes os with latest's dom0 updates.
> I'm using version before the latest qubes-windows-tools.
> I have setted up HVM with windows 7 ultimate 64bit version,
> everything was fine.(i had to do a
On Tuesday, January 17, 2017 at 5:30:38 PM UTC-5, Hariharan Gopalan wrote:
> Hello Group
>
> I am getting the following error while trying to install qubes-windows-tools:
>
> [1848:184C][2017-01-17T22:22:27]i299: Plan complete, result: 0x0
> [1848:184C][2017-01-17T22:22:27]i300: Apply begin
> [18
On Saturday, October 22, 2016 at 4:26:08 PM UTC+3, omeg wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi all,
>
> We uploaded a new version of Qubes Windows Tools (3.2.2-3) to the
> current-testing repository.
>
> Changelog:
> - - Updated Xen PV drivers to be in line with upstre
On Saturday, October 22, 2016 at 9:26:08 AM UTC-4, omeg wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi all,
>
> We uploaded a new version of Qubes Windows Tools (3.2.2-3) to the
> current-testing repository.
>
> Changelog:
> - - Updated Xen PV drivers to be in line with upstre
On Thursday, 27 October 2016 03:21:09 UTC+11, Robert Mittendorf wrote:
> After updating Qubes tool, basically all relavant devices have issues.
>
> Qubes Video, Xen Interface, Xen PV Storage, Xen PV Network.
There has been an issue with QWT for as long as I can remember.
the Qubes Video driver h
After updating Qubes tool, basically all relavant devices have issues.
Qubes Video, Xen Interface, Xen PV Storage, Xen PV Network.
Config in registry incomplete or broken (Code 19)
The repair option of the QWT uninstaller does not solve the issue as well.
Any idea? Otherwise I think I'm stuck
On Tuesday, 25 October 2016 12:22:29 UTC+11, zack...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, October 24, 2016 at 9:02:18 PM UTC-4, Drew White wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 25 October 2016 11:50:53 UTC+11, zack...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Is there a set method to updating the windows tools in the vm itself (after
> >
On Monday, October 24, 2016 at 9:02:18 PM UTC-4, Drew White wrote:
> On Tuesday, 25 October 2016 11:50:53 UTC+11, zack...@gmail.com wrote:
> Is there a set method to updating the windows tools in the vm itself (after
> updating the version in dom0 and such). When I try to install the new one
> o
On Tuesday, 25 October 2016 11:50:53 UTC+11, zack...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> Is there a set method to updating the windows tools in the vm itself
> (after updating the version in dom0 and such). When I try to install the
> new one over top of the old one, or to uninstall the old one first (old
On Monday, October 24, 2016 at 2:09:56 AM UTC-4, Drew White wrote:
> On Sunday, 23 October 2016 00:26:08 UTC+11, omeg wrote:
> > Changelog:
> > - - Updated Xen PV drivers to be in line with upstream
>
> > - - Private disk image is now initialized during setup making the
> > install process requ
On Sunday, 23 October 2016 00:26:08 UTC+11, omeg wrote:
> Changelog:
> - - Updated Xen PV drivers to be in line with upstream
> - - Private disk image is now initialized during setup making the
> install process require one less reboot
Need to give the option to allow choosing of the label, be
W dniu sobota, 22 października 2016 15:26:08 UTC+2 użytkownik omeg napisał:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi all,
>
> We uploaded a new version of Qubes Windows Tools (3.2.2-3) to the
> current-testing repository.
>
> Changelog:
> - - Updated Xen PV drivers to be in lin
Hello,
thanks!
I look forward to use it soon, because Win7 is still central for my productive
work flow.
Kind Regards
P.S. USBVM and audio-support would be very appreciated.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sunday, 02.10.2016 at 06:10 -0700, Drew White wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > You see the difference? Your follow-up reply was inappropriate. It
> > didn't actually explain what you wanted, it didn't help them to help
> > you, and it led to this ridi
On Friday, 30 September 2016 18:34:29 UTC+10, Dave Ewart wrote:
> As I said previously, the version of Windows is not usually discussed
> (since it just depends on which updates have been installed) and you
> would have got a better answer the first time if you'd included - for
> example - "My ver
Am 30.09.2016 um 03:20 schrieb Drew White:
> On Thursday, 29 September 2016 19:40:12 UTC+10, Achim Patzner wrote:
>> No, you -- being a non-paying end-user; I've yet to see any worthwhile
>> contribution from you -- _demanded_ (in a quite untoward manner an
>> explanation from a "developer". Sorr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thursday, 29.09.2016 at 18:01 -0700, Drew White wrote:
> On Thursday, 29 September 2016 17:41:23 UTC+10, Dave Ewart wrote:
> > There is no commonly-accepted definition of 'version' with regard to
> > Windows, only "64-bit v 32-bit" and the Editi
On Thursday, 29 September 2016 19:40:12 UTC+10, Achim Patzner wrote:
> > On Thursday, 29 September 2016 04:05:41 UTC+10, Achim Patzner wrote:
> >> Which part of "we don't provide signed drivers so if you want to run
> >> them you have to turn that requirement off" needs a developer to make
> >> y
On Thursday, 29 September 2016 15:03:45 UTC+10, entr0py wrote:
> It gives me no pleasure (well...) to gang up on a guy who obviously doesn't
> have the slightest notion of what it means to possess even a modicum of
> social grace. But in the absence of a downvote button, how else do you voice
On Thursday, 29 September 2016 17:41:23 UTC+10, Dave Ewart wrote:
> There is no commonly-accepted definition of 'version' with regard to
> Windows, only "64-bit v 32-bit" and the Edition.
>
> If you have some unusual definition of 'version' then you should explain
> what that definition is. Shout
Am 29.09.2016 um 09:41 schrieb Dave Ewart:
> If you have some unusual definition of 'version' then you should explain
> what that definition is. Shouting at people - expecting them to
> understand you - won't help.
Didn't someone read you some classics when you were a child?
Carrol, Lewis, "Thro
Am 29.09.2016 um 03:16 schrieb Drew White:
> On Thursday, 29 September 2016 04:05:41 UTC+10, Achim Patzner wrote:
>> Which part of "we don't provide signed drivers so if you want to run
>> them you have to turn that requirement off" needs a developer to make
>> you understand it and what kind of
entr0py:
>
> You're too modest. You make people's heads explode with your mastery of
> complex subjects - for fun!
Well, my head did kind of explode from reading those highly entertaining
highlights, but I think your explanation only is valid if "mastery" is a
signed variable.
> Just including
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wednesday, 28.09.2016 at 17:53 -0700, Drew White wrote:
> > > > > I would like to know from a dev what the requirements are for
> > > > > Qubes Windows Tools (QWT).
> > > > >
> > > > > All O/S reference are known to be x86_64.
> > > > >
> > > >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
It gives me no pleasure (well...) to gang up on a guy who obviously doesn't
have the slightest notion of what it means to possess even a modicum of social
grace. But in the absence of a downvote button, how else do you voice your
disapproval of a
On Thursday, 29 September 2016 06:08:12 UTC+10, Jeremy Rand wrote:
> Achim Patzner:
> > Am 28.09.2016 um 10:06 schrieb Drew White:
> >> On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 17:47:01 UTC+10, Foppe de Haan wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 8:20:29 AM UTC+2, Drew White wrote:
> Why do
On Thursday, 29 September 2016 04:05:41 UTC+10, Achim Patzner wrote:
> Am 28.09.2016 um 10:06 schrieb Drew White:
> > On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 17:47:01 UTC+10, Foppe de Haan wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 8:20:29 AM UTC+2, Drew White wrote:
> >>> Why does QWT require TESTS
On Thursday, 29 September 2016 01:48:28 UTC+10, Foppe de Haan wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 10:06:13 AM UTC+2, Drew White wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 17:47:01 UTC+10, Foppe de Haan wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 8:20:29 AM UTC+2, Drew White wrote:
>
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 18:33:25 UTC+10, Dave Ewart wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Wednesday, 28.09.2016 at 01:06 -0700, Drew White wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 17:47:01 UTC+10, Foppe de Haan wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, September 28, 201
Achim Patzner:
> Am 28.09.2016 um 10:06 schrieb Drew White:
>> On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 17:47:01 UTC+10, Foppe de Haan wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 8:20:29 AM UTC+2, Drew White wrote:
Why does QWT require TESTSIGNING to be turned on?
Is that because Win7 requires
Am 28.09.2016 um 10:06 schrieb Drew White:
> On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 17:47:01 UTC+10, Foppe de Haan wrote:
>> On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 8:20:29 AM UTC+2, Drew White wrote:
>>> Why does QWT require TESTSIGNING to be turned on?
>>> Is that because Win7 requires things to be signed?
On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 10:06:13 AM UTC+2, Drew White wrote:
> On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 17:47:01 UTC+10, Foppe de Haan wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 8:20:29 AM UTC+2, Drew White wrote:
> > > Hi Devs,
> > >
> > > I would like to know from a dev what the requirem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wednesday, 28.09.2016 at 01:06 -0700, Drew White wrote:
> On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 17:47:01 UTC+10, Foppe de Haan wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 8:20:29 AM UTC+2, Drew White
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Devs,
> > >
> > > I would l
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 17:47:01 UTC+10, Foppe de Haan wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 8:20:29 AM UTC+2, Drew White wrote:
> > Hi Devs,
> >
> > I would like to know from a dev what the requirements are for Qubes Windows
> > Tools (QWT).
> >
> > All O/S reference are known t
On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 8:20:29 AM UTC+2, Drew White wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> I would like to know from a dev what the requirements are for Qubes Windows
> Tools (QWT).
>
> All O/S reference are known to be x86_64.
>
> Does QWT require any specific version of Windows 7?
> Or will they
35 matches
Mail list logo
