--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4762/
--
New ticket #4762 by jeffdn
For Beanbag, Inc. > RBTools
Status: New
Tags:
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4607/
--
New update by Armec
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4607
Reply:
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4653/
--
New update by Misery
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4653
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4703/
--
New update by bugear
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4703
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4703/
--
New update by bugear
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4703
Something I have not found an answer for in the documentation
If a user is part of a review group that is mailing to all of the users in
the group (instead of using the mail alias), what happens when the user is
disabled? Is the user excluded when mail is generated for the group?
--
This is RB 1.7.9. A particular review has 3 diff revisions listed. I can
display the first two diff sets without a problem, but the third revision
will not display the diffs because the diff files do not apply cleanly. I
would simply like to remove the diff revision set and let the submitter
Barret,
This works for me. Thank you for your help.
EXCLUDE_PATTERNS = [
r'*\AssemblyInfo.cs',
r'*\Controllers\*',
r'*\Test\*'
]
On Monday, May 4, 2015 at 3:53:41 PM UTC-6, Barret Rennie wrote:
Hi there Jeff,
When using exclude patterns in your .reviewboardrc file, it takes
Is there a way to collapse the left or right side of the diff view? I
often need to search for keywords in the code that appear in both sides of
the diff. Browser find works horizontally and bounces back and forth
between the left and right diff sides when keywords appear in the same line
of
Could you please elaborate on the syntax for patterns when using
.reviewboardrc EXCLUDE_PATTERNS ?
I am able to use the rbt parameters to exclude a single pattern at the
Windows command line
rbt post --exclude *\AssemblyInfo.cs
this successfully excludes all AssemblyInfo.cs files found
We have a review that is exhibiting this problem. If you wish, we could
package up our SQL...
Jeff
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 7:45:07 AM UTC-8, Bruce Cran wrote:
As seen in
https://vimeo.com/86448355https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fvimeo.com%2F86448355sa=Dsntz=1usg
Thank you so much! We were going a little crazy without RB.
Upgraded successfully from 1.7.6 to 1.7.11
We don't plan on upgrading our Ubuntu 8.04 server anytime soon so I think
we're stuck with Python 2.5.
What can I do to ensure we stick on the 1.7 branch and not upgrade to 1.8
when the
On Saturday, April 20, 2013 2:17:30 AM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi everyone,
We just released RB 1.7.7. It has some new features for admins, bug fixes,
an some good performance improvements.
Full info and a link to the release notes is on the news post at
this on
reviews.reviewboard.org?
Christian
On Apr 21, 2013, at 10:27, Jeff Schroeder jeffschr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, April 20, 2013 2:17:30 AM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi everyone,
We just released RB 1.7.7. It has some new features for admins, bug
fixes, an some good performance improvements
/jeff-codereview as an example,
slightly modified the apache-wsgi.conf, and included it into the apache
config. RB comes up and I got ldap access all happy. When setting up a new
git repo in RB, I am trying to use a repo mirror.
So I set things up like this:
Hosting Service: (None - Custom
On Sunday, April 14, 2013 5:06:26 PM UTC-5, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
After much blood, sweat and tears, I have finally managed to land
ReviewBoard 1.7.6 in the EPEL 6 add-on repository for Red Hat Enterprise
Linux 6 (and its clones). The update should filter out to the
[epel-testing]
a/don't/doing/ :)
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
comments here (John Doe/2012-05-08
14:37 -0500)
/sample
I'd appreciate any information.
Thanks,
Jeff
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users
?
--
Jeff
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr
I'm trying to get reviewboard installed and when I go to
http://localhost/review/
it loads the default page, but clicking on any of the links gives me a
404.
Any ideas what I've got wrong? Here is the virtualhost conf I'm
using:
VirtualHost *:80
ServerName 172.1.1.22
DocumentRoot
afterwards. Reviewboard just makes it unneccessary.
but to answer your question, it works pretty well for face to face reviews.
--Jeff
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Nelson Jones huawen@gmail.com wrote:
Is it overkill if used for meeting type code review (face to face
code review)? Any
This is on Apache on FastCGI. There's a weird issue with us hosting
WSGI because the server is running an older version of Ubuntu
(something we should correct, but can't at the moment).
On Sep 27, 5:48 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for sending me that info
Hey Christian,
Server is using Python 2.5.2, client is using 2.7.1
RB is 1.6.1-py2.5
Djblets is 0.6.11-py2.5
Having some extra debug info might be helpful. You can send any built
packages to this email if you'd like.
Thanks for all your help!
--
Jeff
On Sep 28, 4:17 pm, Christian Hammond
. Authentication from the main page works though, and since both
are supposed to go through the same code path, I have no idea what's
killing the API auth.
--
Jeff
On Sep 26, 4:12 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Sorry for the late reply.
Our authentication for both
to the LDAP server, no error
in the logs.
Is there anywhere I can look to diagnose this issue / potentially get
it to work?
--
Jeff
On Sep 22, 6:59 pm, Jeff Ward j...@fuzzybinary.com wrote:
I'm having more trouble getting LDAP authentication.
I'll admit up front, I'm working with a web server
I'm having more trouble getting LDAP authentication.
I'll admit up front, I'm working with a web server where dedicating a
portion of apache just to review board was not possible. I had to
append the rules to the default site, at the directory root/reviews.
This is a hard requirement.
I am also
I'm having significant problems getting LDAP authentication to work.
First, my problem, then a few suggestions to make this all go a bit
easier. My set up is the following:
Review board 1.6.1
LDAP server: ldap://loaclhost:389
LDAP Base DN: ou=People,dc=domain,dc=com
Given Name Attribute:
,
especially the email one.
--
Jeff
On Sep 12, 3:20 pm, Jeff Ward j...@fuzzybinary.com wrote:
I'm having significant problems getting LDAP authentication to work.
First, my problem, then a few suggestions to make this all go a bit
easier. My set up is the following:
Review board 1.6.1
LDAP server
page grows extremely long, and
difficult for them to read.
Is there a way to view individual reviews that we're somehow missing?
If not, maybe I'll find some time to work up a patch...
Thanks,
Jeff
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy
I have anonymous access turned off. If I turn anonymous access on,
then it works fine. However, anonymous access is not a option for me
in this environment.
The authentication method is standard authentication.
On Nov 16, 2:15 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Sorry
(This is a follow up to this thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/browse_thread/thread/83744baa3a99da0e/cc641214ed414a85?lnk=gstq=authentication#cc641214ed414a85,
but I've made a lot of changes).
I have a fresh reviewboard 1.5 install. I cannot get authentication
to the web api
You've tried following the steps here?
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/linux/
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/linux/I
don't know that there's anything different enough in Ubuntu 10.4 that would
make these instructions not work.
--Jeff
of storing passwords for any of the webapps
(ReviewBoard is IIRC currently the only one of our webapps that doesn't
support it; MediaWiki, Drupal and Redmine all do).
--Jeff
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
How is this different from the update diff option that's currently there?
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Andrew aschwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys. I've been playing with the multiple revisions support in
ReviewBoard.
I was wondering what people think about these two suggestions:
1. It
Hi,
I've just setup ReviewBoard 1.0.5.1, and am having some problems. The
basics are working (connected to our SVN repo, able to create, view
edit reviews, etc)
My primary problem is that email is not being sent. As far as I can
tell from the mail server logs on the machine, ReviewBoard is
Thanks for the very quick replies! How can I verify the settings?
Are they stored in a table, or a file on disk?
thanks, Jeff
On Feb 26, 10:36 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
There's some issue with our settings code and various server threads knowing
when to update
this step, and list changes but mark the review ship it)
The stars I don't use too much, but I believe they're like the stars in
Gmail, In this case they mark a review you may want to check back on for
some reason.
--Jeff
2010/1/21 qhlonline qhlonl...@163.com
Hi, all.
I am not quite
I thought these were moderated now?
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Press Centre sybleheb...@gmail.com wrote:
Love Don't Cost a Thing clip special edition with Naked Jennifer
Lopez! Just look!
http://duuit.com/-jenifer
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
I don't know if it still is, but the docs used to say the semi-official
distro was Ubuntu. I've installed twice on Ubuntu machines, and it went
smoothly both times.
-Original Message-
From: Alfred von Campe alf...@von-campe.com
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 23:12:21
To:
a New Review Request it gives me
the Error 500 page. I can't find *any* logging of what happened.
Does anyone have ideas for how I can at least get logging
information? I'm totally blind as to what the problem is without some
sort of log.
-David
--Jeff
Hmmm, sounds like it's probably something in your web server install... We
might be getting beyond me, but can you describe you environment? Send a copy
of your (sanitized) config file?
--Jeff
-Original Message-
From: David Kent dgk...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:28:26
not to be a pain, but does the web user also have write access to the
directory that the SQLite file resides in? it needs to create a couple of
temp files in that directory for indices and such.
--Jeff
2009/7/16 Pravin Nadarajoo ramp...@gmail.com
Hi there,
I've just installed the new stable
It's not just the file, the folder it resides in as well. That should be a 7
for the user that the web server runs under
--Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Pravin Nadarajoo ramp...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:04:30
To: reviewboardreviewboard@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: backup
memory).
This is debian's apache management system, it's pretty sweet if you dig into
it. There should be documentation all over the web if you get really
interested in learning more.
--Jeff
-Original Message-
From: grimbeaver tbrez...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 06:07:59
).
I bet if I was a more seasoned user I wouldn't be asking this.
Thanks for reading,
Eric P.
--
Jeff
O|||O
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send
I've yet to do an install like that, and someone else may correct me, but
normally that message means that the apache user does not have write access
to bothr the sqlite file and the folder that contains it.
Try tracking that down and changing the permissions/owner.
--Jeff
2009/6/25 Eric P
,
and it's very possible to do with post-review.
--
Jeff
O|||O
2009/5/25 Carlo Camerino cmcamer...@gmail.com
Hi,
i am evaluating several code review software for our company.
We have this question regarding review board,
one of the barriers of entry for our programmers to use
was made outside any version control, and the revision
header is a timestamp.
Do I need to check out the demo's repository first? If so, where is
it?
--
Anthony Foglia
Princeton Consultants
--
Jeff
O|||O
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
I had this problem too... make sure your web user has permissions not only
on the sqlite file, but on the directory it resides in as well.
Jeff
O|||O
2009/1/8 Chris Clark chris.cl...@ingres.com
Phil wrote:
.Sqlite3 is complaining that it cannot open the database file.
(sqlite3
On Oct 17, 3:44 pm, Christian Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, now that is pretty important. I know you normalized the debug output
to prevent any leaked info, but are you sure the file paths were all / and
not a mix of / and \ ?
It is only /
Can you run with --output-diff and then
that is because of the first diff breaking. I'm just not sure what to
change on this server to get it working . Thanks for your help!
// jeff
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To post
--Christian or Dave--
as an enhancement, how hard would it be to set auto expand as either a
user or global setting?
Jeff
O|||O
Help me and the Leukemia and Lymphoma society fight blood cancers:
http://pages.teamintraining.org/dm/tucson08/jandros
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Jeff Andros [EMAIL
script that does this for our perforce
repo
2. I haven't tried it, but there's a revision range argument on
post-review. Last I knew, this doesn't work for all SCM's, but it should
eventually. just supply a revision number like 0. (this has been suggested
before I think)
HTH
Jeff
O|||O
Help
I'm having a very similar problem, I posted here :
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/browse_thread/thread/568ceebbfdab3ff6
Let me know if you get this working, and if so what you did.
On Oct 15, 2:41 pm, jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I’m trying to use reviewboard and P4 and I’m
. This is really frustrating as I can't seem to
get an error, just a bunch of weird behaviour around having a blank
source file. Not to mention I don't see where it's going to the P4
repository to pick this file up again.
Any help appreciated...
// jeff
On Oct 9, 5:46 pm, Jeff Mickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[..]
When I look at /tmp/reviewboard.zoa6PK/tmpCk02zP , it's just an empty
file, which leads me to believe that it'
I accidentally hit send, here's the rest:
When I look at /tmp/reviewboard.zoa6PK/tmpCk02zP , it's just an empty
file
On Sep 29, 5:25 pm, Christian Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jeff. Sorry for the late reply, but I've been away from the computer most
of the past few days.
Obviously, that page should not be appearing every so often. If it claims
that the path is /root/reviewboard, then we need to find
57 matches
Mail list logo
