When you run './manage.py syncdb', it should ask you for a username
and password for the admin.
-David
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:18 PM, wex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any log file I can examine to try and debug this admin login
issue?
On Sep 16, 2:06 pm, wex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as to how to debug the hang I get with manage.py
createsuperuser?
I guess I'll keep paging through the Django docs...
On Sep 16, 2:50 pm, David Trowbridge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
When you run './manage.py syncdb', it should ask you for a
username
Review Board uses Django's database abstractions, so it should work
fine. We've heard from a couple people who have deployed on top of pg,
but MySQL is far more common.
-David
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Juan Jose Comellas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can ReviewBoard store its data on
Once it's working, we'll want to add it to the fixtures so people can
easily select the repository type. Other than that, all you need to do
is implement the SCMTool class.
It's also useful to implement the client-side in post-review for most SCMs.
Good luck,
-David
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at
We send emails on 1, 3 and 4. There's an open bug about 2, but no
immediate ETA for fixing it.
-David
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 7:01 AM, fts1050 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering what all the events that cause an email trigger. My
guess would be:
1.)When a review goes live (to
You need to upgrade your perforce API on the server to 07.3 or 08.1
-David
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 2:51 PM, AndyP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've been running reviewboard now internally for 6 months or so now,
and I was going to create a new server for a much wider audience.
I made the
The best thing to do would be do post a review request on
http://reviews.review-board.org/
If you want to add unit tests before posting the review, that would be awesome.
I think this is only really documented as the code reviews link
under contributing on the web site. We really need to write
Are you up to date with djblets too?
-David
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:01 AM, TP tp...@datadomain.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm using the latest version of reviewboard and it should have the
large data caching feature. But I keep getting this warning in the log
WARNING - Failed to fetch large data
This is something we've been wanting to implement, but it's been lower
priority than a lot of other things for 1.0. If you're interested in
digging into the code, we'd love to see it done sooner.
-David
On 12/22/08, Nithin Sujir nithinsu...@gmail.com wrote:
I am really loving the memcache
Any review request which is a number followed by zeroes (100, 2000,
3) gets a trophy.
Any palindrome gets a fish trophy.
-David
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Christian,
thanks so much!
I'll update our server first thing in the morning.
How else
The old install procedure meant a lot of people ended up putting data
in their site-packages. rb-site doesn't do that anymore.
-David
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Łukasz Jernaś lukasz.jer...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:12 PM, mary ciaom...@gmail.com wrote:
Issue resolved.
The demo server does point to the active SVN server. This is okay
because review board never does any commits to version control.
-David
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Anthony Foglia afog...@princeton.com wrote:
Thanks. I was aware of the tool, but not using it. My questions are
more
There's no automatic method right now. You might be able to write a
script that uses the django shell capabilities to create the groups.
-David
2009/2/17 KunalG kunal.gosw...@gmail.com:
Hi,
We are setting up review board in our company and found one feature
which we need.
We use LDAP
I like using mysqlhotcopy to make an on-line copy of the database.
-David
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Sorry for the delay on this. I haven't been around much this weekend.
Mainly, you'll need to backup the database files (you can use
We've been toying around with how best to do this for a while. Can you
add your suggestions to
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=294 ? This will
help us keep track of them better.
Thanks!
-David
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Isaac Wagner geekyis...@gmail.com wrote:
My
Right now the only additional attachments we support uploading are
screenshots (which really means images in general). In the future, we
plan to make this more generic, but that won't happen for a while
unless someone else does it.
-David
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:45 PM, KunalG
Perhaps we need to paginate the reviews page in addition to the diff?
-David
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 2:03 PM, mary ciaom...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for your reply. The slowness is:
1. page load takes several minutes (the more comments, the longer it
takes)
2. typing a comment is very
We're happy to include support for any SCMs out there, but it's not
realistic for us to implement support for cmsynergy or other SCMs that
we don't have access to. If you or someone else were to submit a patch
for a cmsynergy SCMTool, we'd be happy to include it.
-David
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at
I'm not sure how changing the directory structure here would help you,
and even if it does, it may hinder someone else.
If you have something specific you need to do for your own
application, feel free to modify the directory layout for your usage.
That's what the MIT license is there for.
At VMware, we have a couple thousand engineers working on a single
server. Granted, I think it's a VM
with 4GB of RAM and multiple vcpus, but it's still a single server.
We've been addressing performance recently, and while it's pretty
good, there's still more to do. MySQL
isn't a big
PM, Alexey Morozov morozov...@ngs.ru wrote:
Hi!
On Thursday 21 May 2009 16:17:12 David Trowbridge wrote:
At VMware, we have a couple thousand engineers working on a single
server. Granted, I think it's a VM
with 4GB of RAM and multiple vcpus, but it's still a single server.
We've been
If you're the administrator, you need to use the mysql administration
programs to repair your DB. If you're not, you need to ask your admin.
-David
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:44 PM, kunjal.par...@gmail.com
kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote:
OperationalError at /dashboard/
(1194, Table
I don't see any reason why we shouldn't do this. Accountability is a good thing.
-David
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Paul Scottpsc...@vmware.com wrote:
Hmm... I don't know about that. I mean, if you really wanted to try and stick
unique identifiers in your p4 commands so you could track
It's not currently possible to not have a diff. In the past, we've
just created a dummy diff and reviewed images as screenshots, which
works but isn't great. This request is already tracked in issue 382,
so if you have particular thoughts or needs, please add them there.
Thanks,
-David
On
When you created the branch, you added a numbered revision in the same
paths as the branch that had the code that was on trunk. You can just
do a revision-range post-review between that revision and your branch
HEAD. If you truly want to diff between the current trunk and the
branch, you can
This usually requires a web server restart.
-David
On Sep 24, 2009, at 8:00 AM, Deniz denizde...@gmail.com wrote:
I have installed 1.1 alpha 1 to try Review Board. I try to change E-
Mail settings but it does not get saved. Any idea?
Thanks,
Deniz
There are a couple of patches I should get in to mark additional
strings and wire up tools, and then basically what will happen is that
there will be 2 files in the PO template format which you can then
translate strings into your target language.
There's a handful of stuff that's not
IE6 support is a little rocky, but IE7, IE8, and all similarly recent
versions of firefox are supported.
-David
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote:
We are on verge of rolling out RB 1.0.5 to 300+ developers.
Some of our developers use IE and some of them use
You can generate a PO file using ./manage.py makemessages -a from
within the reviewboard tree. This will generate locale/en/django.po. I
think that if there are more locales in the list, it will also
generate PO files for those, too. To compile these into .mo catalogs,
you can use ./manage.py
In general we've avoided adding this sort of permissions and policy,
since it adds a lot of UI complexity for what is essentially a
sociology problem. We have a bug open requesting some sort of general
policy set-up (while we try to figure out what that means), but I'd
recommend that this is
Right now the only way to partition it this way is to run two separate servers.
-David
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 7:08 AM, Jan Koprowski jan.koprow...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any opportunity to configure one ReviewBoard to many
independent projects? For example two.
There are two projects.
If you're not using memcached, that will be a huge gain.
-David
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
A lot of what Review Board does is computationally expensive, and we've done
a lot to heavily optimize things. Best way to get speedup is to run it on
Close is done through the review_request_close view in webapi/json.py
-David
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 1:22 AM, JohnHenry qhlonl...@163.com wrote:
Hi,
We had a new requirement of 'close condition'. Only if all target
reviewers had ship it this review, The submitter can 'close' this
review
Nobody has done this, and I don't expect it would be easy. You'd have
to write a script that could remap all the primary keys for each table
to not conflict, except in the case where users overlap between
instances. This would also have to update all foreign key relations.
-David
On Apr
This already exists--in the Authentication settings, there's a
check-box for Allow anonymous read-only access
If you then configure RB with a special auth backend, it'll work.
-David
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Stephen Gallagher
step...@gallagherhome.com wrote:
Christian, how much work
Something caused your database to get corrupted (perhaps a system
crash during an operation). The SQLite page has some scenarios at
http://www.sqlite.org/lockingv3.html#how_to_corrupt but I'm not sure
how to recover from it after it's happened.
Using SQLite as a production database isn't really
There aren't any better ways to do it, since this is kind of contrary
to the use cases we had when building RB. I personally like it when
more than one person looks at a review--more eyes means more bugs are
caught early on.
-David
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 6:57 AM, mnem purple.m...@gmail.com
The reviews.reviewboard.org server is running under mysql. We've done
a little tuning but not much. I haven't tried with pgsql at all,
personally.
-David
On Jun 10, 2010, at 11:56 AM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com
wrote:
Well, right now 4-8s for a page refresh is just
Click on the r4 in the top row of revision numbers, where it says
Jump to revision:
-David
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Amit agrawalamit2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have posted four revising of my diff. Can somebody help me how to
view final diff i.e. first file to latest one.
I see
Probably pygments has the wrong idea about what type of file it is,
and is highlighting what it thinks are errors.
-David
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Gordon Morehouse
gordon.moreho...@gmail.com wrote:
When viewing diffs in Review Board, in some of the chunks I'm seeing
punctuation
Probably the best thing is to run post-review with --debug and the
same arguments that the post-commit-hook is using, and see what the
output is.
-David
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:10 AM, ReviewBoard User
lalitha.viswan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I am trying to automate post-review on a RHEL4. Here
This is an awesome article! I'm super impressed to see TFS working,
even if it's by doing an end-run around TFS itself. Thanks so much for
this detailed guide.
-David
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Timothy Pinet tim.pi...@gmail.com wrote:
Good afternoon,
It has taken me some time but I
Probably the solution is to rebuild pysvn from source against your
hand-installed subversion.
-David
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Jamie jgwat...@teldio.com wrote:
I have a Centos 5.1 system which was setup with Reviewboard 1.0.9 and
Subversion 1.4.1. I recently had to upgrade to
There's always http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/686/ , which is almost
2 years old :)
-David
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Thanks Daryl,
I'm glad it's not a release-stopping bug, but we should do some validation
to make sure the path entered
Speaking of which. Is 1.5 RC3 (dev) coming off the release-1.5.x
branch or master?
-David
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
The randpool thing is just a warning from a third party library. You can
ignore it. It shouldn't cause any problems, and is
I'm glad you figured it out!
As far as what to do now, from what I've heard, the future is more
likely to involve wsgi than fastcgi. I think it's a little better with
regards to memory leaks, too.
-David
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 9:43 PM, mxbraun matthew.br...@intel.com wrote:
5) Anyone have
Do you want this for tracking purposes? At the moment, individual reviewers
can mark their approval with the ship it flag, though there's no policy
built around this (it won't prevent a checkin if you don't have one or more
ship-its, for example). Other than that, we generally rely on people
Huh, that sounds wrong. If that's truly the case, we should have a bug about
it.
-David
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Jan Koprowski jan.koprow...@gmail.comwrote:
If I remember draft doesn't show fields passed as post-review command
line parameters but they present and after publish You
I would also like to extend my congratulations and thanks to the six
students who participated this semester. Great work, everyone!
-David
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote:
Hi everyone,
We participated this past four months in UCOSP (Undergraduate
I'm not sure what you mean by whitespace. Can you include a screenshot?
-David
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 2:54 PM, twhalen trwha...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Hi - is it possible to do this? I'm new to RB. Currently I see lots of
whitespace between the 2 sides vertically, and would like to know if I
to more easily compare the lines from
each file. Unfortunately I can't provide a screenshot, since it's a
customer's code...
Thanks for your help.
On Dec 20, 6:08 pm, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by whitespace. Can you include a screenshot?
-David
I would suggest starting by adding --debug to your post-review command line
and checking the output there.
-David
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Hank hank@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
I'm trying to use ReviewBoard 1.5.1 with git via the Raw File mask.
I've added the repo, and it was
There's nothing to automatically add anything other than reviewers and
groups. Some users will have a group per module and then use the default
reviewers feature for that. Other than that the best I can suggest right now
is to encourage people to use descriptive summaries.
-David
On Tue, Dec
There's nothing yet to do this automatically. What most people do is to just
add a review to their own change with some kind of ping message. I
personally prefer this solution because different changes often have
different priorities, and people already get quite a bit of email from
review board.
Review Board does not automatically submit code for you. What's expected is
that you'll commit your code as you have always done, and close - submitted
is just a way of marking the review request as being done because the code is
committed (as opposed to closing because the change was
There's no fine-grained control of this. Review Board should send email
whenever anyone clicks publish, whether it's on a review or a reply to a
review. If the latter isn't working, it's possible something is broken. Can
you check your httpd logs and see if there are any errors in there?
-David
if one of the addresses is blank.
There's no reason why any of our accounts should need email addresses,
as the emails go out to a mailing list. Yes, it wants to populate the
'from' field, but why not just fallback to the domain's reviewboard
email address?
On Jan 19, 3:04 pm, David Trowbridge
If you're running through apache, you'll have to at least do a reload
(which is like a restart but it just reloads its configuration). If it's not
obvious how to do that, then a restart will also work.
It's usually easier to use django's built-in web server while making code
changes, because it
This is a bug in the creation form. Please file a bug on our bug-tracker and
we'll get a fix in the next point release.
Thanks,
-David
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Michael Milbrath m.milbr...@gmail.comwrote:
I've seen a couple errors similar to the following occur in the last
couple of
Review Board can deal with large diffs, but I don't think there's really
much in the way of helping reviewers deal with it. The only help I can
think of is that it will split it across pages in order to avoid having
giant web pages to look at (by default 20 files to a page). If there are
specific
These two items are already possible through Review Board's settings page.
See
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.5/admin/admin-ui/authentication-settings/
for
details on the Allow anonymous read-only access and Enable registration
settings.
-David
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Aki
.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:49 AM, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.comwrote:
These two items are already possible through Review Board's settings
page. See
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.5/admin/admin-ui/authentication-settings/
for
details on the Allow anonymous read-only access
#2 would be great; I know a lot of people have requested the ability to have
some indication that the patch submitted will (a) apply cleanly and (b)
build (maybe even including automated testing).
#1 is often requested, but it's something which we've been wary of because
of the complexities of
Thanks for the feedback!
Can you clarify what you mean by ability to format fixed-width blocks of
code?
-David
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Stephen Tyree tyree...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I've been using ReviewBoard for over a year now, and the only thing I
find a lacking from a
There's no way to add a link with inline text, like that. However, if you
just include the link itself in the comment, it should be turned into a
hyperlink. Most people do it like this:
blah blah comment, see http://test for info.
-David
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 6:02 AM, shilpageo
I don't know how hg postreview works, but at some point it calls post-review,
correct? I think it would need to be modified to use --submit-as to suit your
case.
- David
On May 10, 2011, at 4:40 PM, Jeffrey Reynolds
jeffrey.james.reyno...@gmail.com wrote:
Howdy all,
I'm posting here
You may need to tell the web server to restart in order for it to reload the
code.
- David
On May 28, 2011, at 4:43 PM, André Hänsel an...@webkr.de wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to call a script when a review is marked as submitted.
According to
These numbers are kept in the Local Site Profiles table. They used to be
computed on the fly, but it was a pretty serious performance impact so now
we cache them.
If you go to Admin Database Local Site Profiles, you can delete them
safely, and they'll be recreated with zeroes.
-David
On Mon,
We've been aware of this since the beginning, and while we're trying to
figure out a solution that doesn't break threading, at the moment there's
really not much you can do other than filtering on the client side. There
are a handful of headers that we insert into emails to help with this.
-David
The best way to do this is to leave the repository objects there, and just
turn off the show check-box in the admin. This will remove it from the UI
but leave existing review requests unaffected.
-David
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Charlie Hsu vmdx.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
We are
Are you running in apache? Have you restarted/reloaded the httpd after
installing pylucene?
- David
On Jul 28, 2011, at 6:44 AM, Matthew Blair mpbl...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
I installed ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Ubuntu Server 11.04, including the
step to install the PyLucene package.
It's entirely possible. The best way to do this is to leave existing items
as-is, and add a new Repository for the SVN server.
-David
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Christopher Hahn xrz1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
My team is moving from Perforce to SVN and I must prepare for keeping
RB
Make sure to change the sender e-mail address field in Admin Settings
E-Mail.
-David
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 3:41 PM, NIck cryp...@gmail.com wrote:
It does not appear the issue was resolved. I'm experiencing the exact same
problem. I'm running Review Board 1.5.5 on CentOS 6. The rest of
We love you too!
Happy reviewing,
-David
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Matthew Flint m...@tthew.org wrote:
Hey,
We just upgraded ReviewBoard, and I see there are now method names
shown even when that part of the file is hidden.
It is brilliant. I love you all.
Matthew
--
Want to
By virtue of adding the file, you're creating a change that can be
expressed via a diff. `cvs diff -Nu` will create a diff that includes
newly-added files that reviewboard can understand (though of course,
we recommend using post-review, which will just do that for you).
-David
On Sat, Sep 24,
We do not currently assign any sort of policy in this regard.
If you wanted, you could write a hook script for your version control
that used the REST API in order to check that a review request has a
ship-it from the relevant people before a change is committed.
-David
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011
Access control can be enabled on a per-group or per-repository level.
See these documentation pages for detail:
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.6/admin/configuration/repositories/#access-control
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.6/admin/configuration/review-groups/#access-control
Review Board never writes to your repository. Developers still have to
commit code using 'svn commit'
-David
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Bing Hua jasoninelmstr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've set up reviewboard and trying to use it on a small project. The
question is, is there a way to
There's nothing built-in. If you only care about simple counts, you
could probably
write something using the REST API pretty easily.
-David
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Gyanesh Singh gyanesh.si...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way one can collect some basic kind of metrics, e.g
You could use it for either. It's maybe not perfect during a meeting
but it does mean that
you have a full record of all the comments.
-David
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Nelson Jones huawen@gmail.com wrote:
Is it overkill if used for meeting type code review (face to face
code
When configured correctly, review board should easily handle that. The largest
deployment I know of has 4000 users and over 27 review requests on a single
4-CPU system with 4G of RAM. Do you have memcached configured?
- David
On Oct 6, 2011, at 12:14 PM, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
Reviews can always be added, even if the request is marked as
submitted or discarded. This is intentional, since someone may want to
point out something after the author has submitted their change to
version control.
-David
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Gyanesh Singh gyanesh.si...@gmail.com
There's currently an open bug about this:
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1436
The best I can suggest right now is to make the user not inactive
but change the password in the admin.
-David
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:43 AM, J Terence Crump jtcrum...@gmail.com wrote:
We
You'll have to check your web server logs for the full error, but my
guess is that p4python is not correctly installed.
-David
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 9:50 PM, thegreendroid shreyasbhar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I am trying to add a new Perforce repository in the Reviewboard Admin
be recorded in the web server log? I checked
Reviewboard's logs but there was nothing there.
On Oct 26, 6:02 pm, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.com wrote:
You'll have to check your web server logs for the full error, but my
guess is that p4python is not correctly installed.
-David
On Tue, Oct
here. Also, how do I enable
Reviewboard logs?
On Oct 26, 6:56 pm, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.com wrote:
It depends on which web server you're using and what method of
invoking review board.
You can also check the review board logs (if enabled).
-David
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:44 PM
For the API, you can use HTTP Basic authentication with any of your requests.
-David
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Kent Johnson kent3...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using the API for read-only access with anonymous access enabled,
so I don't get any authentication challenges. As a workaround
, 7:19 pm, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.com wrote:
There's a logging tab in the admin where you can set this up.
-David
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:16 PM, thegreendroid
shreyasbhar...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using Apache v2.2.21 with mod_wsgi and p4python is installed. I
am using
If you're developing using the built-in devserver, you can use pdb to
drop into a specialized python repl.
http://docs.python.org/library/pdb.html#module-pdb
When it's running in production under apache/lighttpd/etc, there's no
easy way to debug other than logging.
-David
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011
You're not the only one :)
We've been discussing for a while the best way to handle this use
case, and hopefully we'll be able to fix it by 1.7 (but no promises).
-David
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Steve seide.al...@gmail.com wrote:
I have an enhancement request I'd like to run by you.
This isn't really possible right now. We've been discussing how we might
support patch series but it's a long-term goal.
There are a few ways that I've seen people cope:
(a) post each change in the series as a successive diff, so you can use
interdiffs to see what changed each time.
(b) post
This page should tell you what changes need to be made. Can you tell
us what the rest of the page says?
-David
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Jason jasonyi...@gmail.com wrote:
When completed install review board an accesss the web site, i got
this error,anyone can help me?
Except for site admins, there's no way to do this currently. We're in the middle
of trying to figure out how to make reviews more collaborative, but there's no
timeline for when anything will happen.
-David
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 3:24 AM, Yakov Shereshevsky
yakov.shereshev...@gmail.com wrote:
We're planning on shipping 1.7 some time in early 2012, with
experimental extensions
support (meaning that the API might change, requiring extension
changes). We don't
yet have a timeline for 2.0
-David
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Kannaiyan Natesan gbpnk...@gmail.com wrote:
We are keenly
You can post reviews after the fact using --revision-range, or from a
post-commit hook.
There's an example of a hook at
https://github.com/reviewboard/reviewboard/blob/master/contrib/tools/svn-hook-postcommit-review
-David
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:29 AM, jlub elsqu...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm
Can you clarify what you mean by line width?
-David
2012/1/4 Shreyas Desai (શ્રેયસ દેસાઈ) shreyas.de...@gmail.com
Guys,
This Q might be asked/answered before but couldn't find it on the
group. So here it goes again.
I want to set the line width for our reviewboard to 100 chars. How do
I
We don't show additional context right now (I suppose we could consider
adding
such an option), but are you aware of multi-line comments? If the comment
applies to a block of code more than one line in length, you can click and
drag
to specify all the relevant lines. This lets the reviewer decide
what you mean, but it's a confusing option to use for us.
On Jan 6, 2012 8:01 PM, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.com wrote:
We don't show additional context right now (I suppose we could consider
adding
such an option), but are you aware of multi-line comments? If the comment
applies to a block
The critical issue is that pysvn does not yet support SVN 1.7, and generates
broken results. If someone can find a workaround we're happy to integrate
it,
but otherwise I think we're going to wait for pysvn to update.
-David
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:19 PM, phoke paul.w.h...@gmail.com wrote:
We haven't (yet) gone through a formal registration process (which is why it
has ™ instead of ®). If you're making a derivative work for it, I think
we're fine
with it as long as it's still related to reviewboard. The reason we have
the TM
is to protect an association between that icon and the
1 - 100 of 1569 matches
Mail list logo
