On 7/8/05, Goncalo Farias wrote:
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
V Hello Avi,
On 7/6/05, Vili wrote:
Download the Hungarian manuals :))
Well, the documentation probably could not be any less clear to me in
Magyar than it is in English. :-)
V Magyar... How do you know this
On 7/8/05, Ben Allen wrote:
Howdy Jay,
Howdy, Ben.
Friday, July 8, 2005, 9:12:10 AM, Jay wrotened:
JW Pardon me, Goncalo, but that was not Vili's question. Vili asked me
JW how it happens that I know this word.
Calm let your hackles settle...
No hackles, Ben. I was just pointing out
On 7/9/05, Goncalo Farias wrote:
I was kidding... :)
Well, I was serious, but I wasn't upset... not with you at least. Your
remarks were neither deprecating nor pretentious.
And, just FTR, I was always relaxed.
What's all about Magyar?
If you really want to know the answer to that, Goncalo,
On 7/9/05, Goncalo Farias wrote:
I'm not a traveller... but if I were I would start by the fiords :)
They're my next best thing after my home-job itinerary :P
Then don't miss Norway - a great country and a great people... even if
they do talk through their nose. :-)
--
jaywalker
Windows XP
On 7/10/05, Liz wrote:
hehehe
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/download.php
You get to sing up!
Another I scratch your back - you scratch my back promotion deal.
Anything for money. It could just as easily have been sin up.
As far as I can tell, you don't even get POP3 access -
On 7/11/05, Goncalo Farias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JW
http://secure.mail.lycos.co.uk/services/content/advdetail.jsp?advid=advdetailsadvsvc=advcompare
Accordingly to your link, the basic package has HTTP/IMAP...
You are right, Goncalo. No POP3 unless you pay, but HTTP/IMAP even
for free. So
On 7/11/05, Manuel Breitfeld wrote:
On Monday, 11 July 2005 at 07:55 AM, Jay Walker wrote:
Accordingly to your link, the basic package has HTTP/IMAP...
You are right, Goncalo. No POP3 unless you pay, but HTTP/IMAP even
for free. So what is HTTP/IMAP?
Just a webinterface?
That would
On 7/11/05, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
Monday, July 11, 2005, 9:46:32, you wrote:
That would be my guess. And, if so, the Lycos offers local POP3 access
only with a paid account and no local IMAP access, even with a paid
account. So, should that be the case, there really does not seem to be
much
On 7/12/05, Miroslav Florensen wrote:
How can we request that?
German - http://www.ritlabs.com/lycos_ex_de
English - http://www.ritlabs.com/lycos_ex_en
French - http://www.ritlabs.com/lycos_ex_fr
So let me get this straight. Instead of free POP3 access and nearly
2.5Gb storage with
On 7/12/05, Alexander S. Kunz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 12:36:40 +0200, Jay Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So let me get this straight. Instead of free POP3 access and nearly
2.5Gb storage with Gmail, Ritlabs is recommending a spammed 300Mb
storage on Lycos?
Yes
On 7/14/05, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
@13-Jul-2005, 21:38 +0700 (13-Jul 15:38 UK time) Thomas Fernandez [TF]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
MDP Confirmed! Keep forgetting to report this. It happens to me too.
TF Are you guys using OTFE?
I'm not.
I can't... the search hangs for
On 7/14/05, Natasha V Pearce wrote:
I write part of an email, save it and come back to it in the Outbox later,
only
to find some random characters have disappeared. Can be from
anywhere:
beginning, middle or end of a word or sometimes it can span between two
words.
It
On 7/14/05, Ian A. White wrote:
Well, now that you mention it this happened to me this morning.
My normal template uses a disclaimer and I went to great lengths to
make sure that it was spelling mistake free. Then when I sent an
e-mail to my accountant this morning, the normal spelling check
On 7/14/05, Peter Meyns wrote:
MB Where can I choose the character set to be used?
It is displayed in the message editor bottom right. Rightclick and see
all installed charsets to make your selection.
Right-click, left-click... it's the same. But this setting only seems
to apply to the
I don't know about others, but when 3.51 rolled up I thought that RL
was just polishing a release to replace the faulty one on their
Website - the one that somehow eliminated BayesIt. I had no idea that
instead of this ostensible objective RL was going to use me as an
alpha tester for a feature or
On 7/18/05, Natasha V Pearce wrote:
been taken out of context, but if you feel I've misquoted you and/or
quoted
them in a misleading or otherwise inappropriate manner, please feel free
to
send down the fire-breathing trout of vengeance to toast me in the pit
of
eternal
On 7/18/05, Chris Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you sure you are cut out for testing software?
Testing software? Yes. Testing a RitLabs email client? I am not sure
any longer... for the reasons stated in my initial message on this
thread.
The simple fact is that I cannot afford to have
On 7/18/05, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
Monday, July 18, 2005, 11:58:56, you wrote:
With an introduction like that - and with the
BayesIt problem still unresolved - who would imagine that we would be
embarking on an entirely new series of beta (pardon, me, alpha)
testing of a very risky nature?
On 7/18/05, Natasha V Pearce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And you believe the following to be non-inflamatory?
This announcement goes beyond carelessness and irresponsibility. I
hesitate
to use terms like criminal neglect, but I believe a case could be made in
such
a direction.
I
On 7/18/05, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 17:50:07 +0300 GMT (18/07/2005, 21:50 +0700 GMT),
Jay Walker wrote:
JW I might be wrong, but it seems to me that RL is now trying to
JW implement a new degree of unicode support and that RL knew - or
JW should have known - in advance
On 7/19/05, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:41:28 +0300 GMT (19/07/2005, 00:41 +0700 GMT),
Jay Walker wrote:
JW Again, Thomas, you are talking like someone who is at the
JW beginning of a beta cycle and not the end of a beta cycle.
Correct. - Get it?
Well, I am glad that I
On 7/19/05, Natasha V Pearce wrote:
I suppose it might be inflammatory to someone who works for RL; although I
see
no sign that RL employees are inflamed
They show remarkable forebearance in the face of such amusingly OTT
accusations.
I don't see why those words should inflame
On 7/19/05, Alexander S. Kunz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 02:00:59 +0200, Natasha V Pearce
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jay
Could we end this maybe and call him Avi Yashar again?
Wow! That's not just OTT (over the top) but also OTW (off the wall)
and NAZI (not any zebra
On 7/19/05, Roelof Otten wrote:
Hallo Jay,
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:07:24 +0300GMT (19-7-2005, 11:07 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
AY Wow! That's not just OTT (over the top) but also OTW (off the wall)
AY and NAZI (not any zebra intheworld).
moderator
Note: This moderator's
On 7/19/05, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:07:24 +0200, Jay Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jay
Could we end this maybe and call him Avi Yashar again?
Wow! That's not just OTT (over the top) but also OTW (off the wall)
and NAZI (not any zebra intheworld).
*plonk
Maxim,
On 7/25/05, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
It is supposed to be a replacement of the currenlty downloadable 3.5.30.
With the MSIs for both 3.51.9 and 3.51.10, you have added the above
line at the end. I appreciate the spirit of this remark (as reflected
in my comments on the
3.51, Communications,
On 7/25/05, Gleason Pace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
of beta tests. From the comments that I am seeing from testers - for
example, With broken RegEx? No, thank you. - it does not seem to
me that we are very close to getting an acceptable, stable release.
.30 had big problems and needs to
On 7/25/05, Bernd Distler wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:44:19 -0700, Gleason Pace [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
So why don't we get a bugfixed release?
No, we get a lot of new betas with not/bad (i don't mean not bad!)
working unicode-support and in following of this a not working RegEx
which
Gleason, one thing more that I neglected to say...
On 7/25/05, Gleason Pace wrote:
I disagree. The past few betas have been much, much better in general
use. For the first time in months, I can say that I am delighted to
be able to use TB as my full time email client. My suggestion is to
On 7/25/05, Marek Mikus wrote:
My suggestion remains the same (as mentioned in the 3.51,
Communications, and Ethics thread): Drop back to 3.5.36 and package
something from there - before you started trying to resolve some
additional charset issues - for distribution as your 3.51 release.
On 7/25/05, Marek Mikus wrote:
My suggestion remains the same (as mentioned in the 3.51,
Communications, and Ethics thread): Drop back to 3.5.36 and package
something from there - before you started trying to resolve some
additional charset issues - for distribution as your 3.51 release.
Thanks for the clarification, 9Val. Please see below for my perspective.
On 7/25/05, 9Val [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's look more detailed - IMAP and Unicode support need a lot of
architectural changes. They are not possible to be finished in one
beta serie. So... On the one way
On 7/25/05, 9Val [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know, that there are a lot of complaints about 3.51 beta serie.
Now I'll describe some reasons why we release it.
Sorry, 9Val, I did not realize that you had already made a public
release of 3.51 when you wrote this. I thought that you were
On 7/25/05, 9Val [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JW many TB users will probably prefer to
JW stick with a safe and stable version - one that has all of the
JW components that they need and most of the components that they want.
3.51 is more stable than 3.5.30 and has the same components. If you
On 7/26/05, 9Val [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3.51.10
3 = the major version number
51 = first cipher means feature list
second cipher encodes stability/bugfix list
10 = public build revision, used for minor fixes and beta versions
9Val, if I understand this correctly, then we are currently
On 7/26/05, 9Val [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Jay,
JW But, personally, two things are of most interest to me in respect to 3.51:
JWo Can I rely on MicroEd to not distort the text of my email messages?
Yes
Thank you, 9Val. Relying on your assurance, I will then install
3.51.10 and
9Val, thank you for your patience with all of my questions.
On 7/26/05, 9Val wrote:
JW If this be so, when do you suppose RL will look into the issue
JW involving the search engine hanging - for me, at least, whenever I try
JW to implement OTFE? In other words, the same search in Non-OTFE runs
9Val, thank you for your patience with all of my questions.
On 7/26/05, 9Val wrote:
JW If this be so, when do you suppose RL will look into the issue
JW involving the search engine hanging - for me, at least, whenever I try
JW to implement OTFE? In other words, the same search in Non-OTFE runs
9Val, thank you for your patience with all of my questions.
On 7/26/05, 9Val wrote:
JW If this be so, when do you suppose RL will look into the issue
JW involving the search engine hanging - for me, at least, whenever I try
JW to implement OTFE? In other words, the same search in Non-OTFE runs
In these days of renewed Pottermania, I am surprised to see that RL is
still suppressing its TB wizards.
What I mean to say is that in 3.51.10 - and maybe in some earlier
versions - I go to my Tools menu and see at the bottom an arrow that
is unnamed (Voldemort?) pointing to a submenu that is
Just tested this on another machine. Went from 3.51.10 Non-OTFE, where
the search engine works okay, through the somewhat painful and
time-consuming process of backup and uninstall and reinstall and then
finally restore to get the 3.51.10 OTFE implementation of TB. And here
on this *third* machine
On 7/27/05, Roelof Otten wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:06:02 +0300GMT (27-7-2005, 7:06 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
AY What I mean to say is that in 3.51.10 - and maybe in some earlier
AY versions - I go to my Tools menu and see at the bottom an arrow that
AY is unnamed (Voldemort?)
On 7/27/05, Wayne Howard wrote:
I should also have said that you should backup your existing
tbuser.def first. You will lose any modifications that you have made
that are stored here. However, for me, remaking the few modifications
I had was well worth it!
Recreating the tbuser.def file
On 7/27/05, Wayne Howard wrote:
I am the wrong person to ask. I discovered this on my own, with some
help from Mary. As far as it being corrupted, that is my speculation.
It could very well be that it simply has outmoded or superfluous
entries. Look at it in notepad. It contains a lot of
On 7/27/05, Dave Gorman wrote:
Yesterday I sent TBBETA TBUDL unsubscribe requests to the address in the
headers. I am still receiving list mail. How long does it usually take for
unsubscribe requests to be completed?
Try going to the following URL:
On 7/28/05, NetVicious wrote:
miércoles, 27 jul 2005 at 16:39, it seems you wrote:
Upcoming release version: 3.6
Latest test build: 3.51.8
WHAT?
Ritlabs, please, number the upcoming release version as 3.60.
NV, I completely agree, but... as others have argued... TB has
On 7/28/05, Mary Bull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Natasha!
Come on, girls, please take it offline already. That's four messages
so far, and I am starting to feel like a captive voyeur. :yech:
--
jaywalker
Windows XP Pro SP2 and The Bat! Pro (No OTFE) 3.51.10
I just thought to download the 3.51 MSI to test how it upgrades a
simple, largely non-functional OTFE installation on a desktop that I
rarely use. So once again I had an opportunity to see the advert for
Lycos Mail. I must admit that I still find that advert confusing,
mainly because it appears to
On 8/4/05, Kevin Amazon wrote:
Exactly. I have now 3 tasks that are obviously hung (having been
executing for over 3 hours). It is pretty obvious to me that IMAP is
still not quite ready for prime time. sigh
Pardon me for jumping into this thread without studying the entire
discussion, but is
It seems that since upgrading to 3.51.10 more people have started to
complain that messages they send to me are not delivered. I am also
receiving - frequently but not always - replies to my messages that
come in two parts: text and Part.ATT.
I have not seen this Part.ATT before. It seems to be
On 8/4/05, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
I'd say yes. Something formatted the text in a way The Bat! ain't
using, so I'd say it's a sender side thing. Maybe you want to have a
look in these messages headers for X-Mailer ... Maybe the people you
receive the Part.ATT mail from are using the same
On 8/4/05, Manuel Breitfeld wrote:
I'm sorry, this was just a duplicate entry. The entry, which is currently open
for opinions, is the following: ;)
Filenames of attachments are not correctly decoded (RFC 2231):
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4197
Yes, this definitely sounds like
On 8/4/05, Vili wrote:
Could you export and send me in private the mail that has this
part.att problem?
Not this time, Vili. I don't share personal email on principle. Think
of it as a Catholic priest sort of thing. But if I get something less
sensitive, I'll pass it on.
--
jaywalker
Windows
On 8/5/05, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
JW Added a note to the report.
Your note does not fit into the scheme: you have posted a MIME entry
for a text/plain message part without *any* filename, which is not
even explicitly attached. The code you posted does not relate to the
described bug.
Oh
It starts slow and eventually hangs/freezes. Stopping is still
difficult. After stopping a frozen search, I got some AVs and a
System Error, Code: 1400, Invalid window handle. (And, of course,
the same search works fine when OTFE is not enabled.) Reverting to No
OTFE.
So I hope that this
I have no problem with the Attachments label. I wondered about it in
the beginning, but figured it was another GUI cosmetic enhancement. I
agree with Marek that now it is here we should just leave it. However,
I think Simon raises two very good points as well. Please see below...
On 8/21/05,
I am still missing at least one menu item in 3.60.05. On the Specials
menu, there is an empty spot under View Source that contains a submenu
for New Watch Replies Folder.
--
jaywalker
Windows XP Pro SP2 and The Bat! Pro (No OTFE) 3.60.02
On 8/28/05, Roger Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need to edit your tbuser.def file
Using the Edit\Find facility, find the row container item
[MailerForm].[mWatchRepliesIn] and change it
to container item [MsgCtl].[mWatchRepliesIn].
Yep, that does the trick. Thanks. (But I still
On 8/28/05, Greg Strong wrote:
I am still missing at least one menu item in 3.60.05. On the Specials
menu, there is an empty spot under View Source that contains a submenu
for New Watch Replies Folder.
Can NOT confirm.
IIRC I had a similar problem. I think it was the 'tbuser.def' file
On 8/27/05, Cees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TF Or, into what directory should I put it?
you can either delete it, or extract it in the directory your
thebat.exe
resides. It won't do any harm.
Are you sure about that Cees? I have a BayesIt subdirectory, in which
resides a file with
On 8/28/05, Roger Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sunday, August 28, 2005, 5:58:09 AM, among other things, you wrote:
JW Yep, that does the trick. Thanks. (But I still think that RL should
JW fix this bug.)
Agreed, but I suspect that like a lot of what RL consider minor bugs
it will
On 8/30/05, Roger Phillips wrote:
JW By the way, I note that at least some of my shortcuts no longer work.
JW I have tried to assign shortcuts to Mark as Junk and Mark as NOT
JW Junk on the Specials menu. No matter what shortcuts I assign, they do
JW nothing. But I can perform the operation
On 8/31/05, Simon Fincham wrote:
In the main this is working well, no major issues.
Unless the search engine stops hanging on OTFE searches that work fine
with non-OTFE, then I would not consider any release to be working
well, no major issues. The failure of the search engine to function
in
On 9/2/05, Paul Van Noord wrote:
Seems to me you have hardware problems such as too little available
RAM, slow hard drive, etc. If you are using a notebook with a 4200 rpm
hard drive and/or you have little _available_ RAM you are going to
have slow searches. Also, there may be limitations with
On 10/2/05, Martin Schoch wrote:
But then I can't stop the search - to click the button Stop doesn't
end the search...
With OTFE, the search has never worked for me. Not only the Stop
button does not stop, but the search never finishes. Hence, confirmed
and reconfirmed... to the point that
On 10/3/05, Peter Meyns wrote:
MS As wrote in my first post. I click on the Find messages in the
MS toolbar on top. The first default search option is Text Contains
MS So I give a text string to find and I push the start button. When I
MS push the stop button to stop the search nothing goes.
On 10/6/05, Maxim Masiutin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it true that the problem only exists when dealing with large folders, e.g.
more than 5000 messages per folder?
No, the problem occurs with much fewer messages as well.
Sorry, but I don't have anything to add to that report. It is as
On 10/6/05, Peter Meyns wrote:
JW Peter, this is simply not logical. OTFE is not a factor for you, but
JW that does not mean it is not a factor for others.
That's why I added (alone).
Peter, I am sorry that I misunderstood you, although now your remark
seems to be theoretical on an entirely
On 10/26/05, Vili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Alexander,
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5232
You consider this bug *major*? Wow, how often do you cancel saving an
attachment? ;-)
:)) Maybe I overstated that :))
Not necessarily. Since 3.62.01, I cannot delete some attachments,
On 10/28/05, Jay Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not necessarily. Since 3.62.01, I cannot delete some attachments,
notably the ones with long names with unknown characters (derived from
unsupported languages). I can save the files to disk, but when I try
to delete the attachment, TB just
On 10/29/05, Leif Gregory wrote:
I'm sending this through Gmail.
The only problem I have with Gmail is that the Web interface (which I
am using now) currently strips trailing spaces and hence corrupts the
sig delimiter. However, this does not happen when sending over the
Gmail server from TB.
When I copy and paste from a text file in UNIX format, the first line
is okay, but with every subsequent line the first character is
stripped off.
For me this makes TB unusable. The problem is I don't know how to
safely go back from 4.0 to 3.9. Any advice?
--
jaywalker
Windows XP Pro SP2 and
On 2/18/08, Jay Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I copy and paste from a text file in UNIX format, the first line
is okay, but with every subsequent line the first character is
stripped off.
For me this makes TB unusable. The problem is I don't know how to
safely go back from 4.0 to 3.9
On Feb 18, 2008 2:29 PM, Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
JW When I copy and paste from a text file in UNIX format, the first line
JW is okay, but with every subsequent line the first character is
JW stripped off.
Could you tell me what editor you were using for copying
text in UNIX format please? I
On Feb 19, 2008 11:09 PM, Maxim Masiutin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Bat! 4.0.14.3 is available at
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb40143.rar
What's new in 4.0.14.3 since 4.0.14.2:
Not to nag or anything, but I guess it cannot hurt to remind. Until
the bug with copying
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Jens Franik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you think, the Guys at Ritlabs do for their dayly
work? This bug was already fixed silently...
Jens, thanks for the information, but I would like to have
confirmation before I upgrade to 4.x again. Please understand
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Marek Mikus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for the problem with 4.0 and copy-paste from UNIX text, if someone
confirms this, can you please post a bug notice for me (assuming it
does not yet exist). Sorry, though I am still an avid Bat user, I
don't get the
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello MAU,
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:16:51 +0100 GMT (26/02/2008, 19:16 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
until 3.99, You could select messages in messages list or in finder and
drag them to editor window, message were attached
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Marek Mikus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[-] (#0006860) Messages could not be dragged from messages list to Editor
window
partially fixed, because when I select messages and drag them to editor in
taskbar, editor window is not focused. Only way is to use
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
until 3.99, You could select messages in messages list or in finder and
drag them to editor window, message were attached as MIME.
This is broken in 4.0
It's fixed in the current beta version.
Confirmed.
When I try to paste anything at the very end of a message - as little
as one line below the end of the message - TB now coughs up the
following error:
List index out of bounds (7)
Hope it's not contagious.
--
jaywalker
Windows XP Pro SP2 and The Bat! Pro (No OTFE) 4.0.16.2
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Dwight Corrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Click the Reply button for any message.
2. Copy some text from the new message, and scroll down to a new line
after the end of your new message.
3. Do a Ctrl+V (or paste by any other means).
I can confirm it
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Zygmunt Wereszczynski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Monday, March 10, 2008, at 20:02:40 [UTC+0200] (Monday, March 10,
2008 19:02 my local time) Jay Walker wrote:
3. Do a Ctrl+V (or paste by any other means).
I invariably get a List index out of bounds
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Volker Ahrendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Reply to: »Jay Walker« · 2008-03-10 · 07:37 h (CET)]
Moin, Jay!
When I try to paste anything at the very end of a message - as
little as one line below the end of the message - TB now coughs up
the following error
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 8:43 PM, MAU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Jay,
Anyway, I have now filed a bug report at
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6911.
Just added a note saying:
,- [ ]
| Confirmed with 4.0.18.
|
| Not if I just position cursor at EOF, but YES if using
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Marek Mikus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
Wednesday, March 12, 2008, MikeD (2) wrote:
OK ... it has been quiet here for a while. I didn't think much
about that (it has happened before right after a big release), but
I just got an email
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Maxim Masiutin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's new in 4.0.18.1 since 4.0.18:
[-] (#0006911) MicroEd: Pasting multiple lines after EOT did not work
Confirmed.
--
jaywalker
Windows XP Pro SP2
The Bat! Pro 4.0.18.1
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Art [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The toolbar locations appear not be positioning correctly. On 4.0.14.3 it
works fine ie. you can position/snap the tool bars correctly. From 4.0.14.4
and on you cannot and they will only snap into the message list pane, or the
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 3:00 AM, Hendrik Oesterlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kertész Vilmos wrote on 18/03/2008 at 11:46:51 +1100
subject Alt-L issue :
using Alt-L to reformat a paragraph, reforts it, but doesn't return
the cursor at the beginning of the paragraph as it used to do.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Art [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Confirmed in 4.0.18.1. Art's workaround - reverting to 4.0.14.3 - also
confirmed.
Looks like it's been fixed in 4.0.18.2!!! Yay! Now I can get rid of the
4.0.14.3 executable.
Art, I regret to say that it is not completely fixed
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Maxim Masiutin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's new in 4.0.18.3 since 4.0.18.2:
[-] Docking of toolbars in the main window is back to normal
Confirmed.
--
jaywalker
Windows XP Pro SP2
The Bat! Pro 4.0.18.3
Sorry, if this is OT, but I am talking about something that is
advertised on the Ritlabs Web site as a new email service from
Ritlabs and Google and only for users of The Bat! v4.
As far as I can tell, thebat.net is a standard service offered by
Google to anyone with a registered domain for which
Here's a weird one. This morning I was looking at the last message in
one folder. I changed folders, and when I went back to the previous
folder, the message was gone... along with several preceding messages.
Then I went to my inbox, and the last 9/10 of the messages were
missing. Okay, I knew
When launching TB in OTFE Pwd mode, the initial password screen has a
small dark gray area on the bottom left side. It does not affect
functionality. It just looks funny/curious.
--
jaywalker
Windows XP Pro SP2
The Bat! Pro 4.0.20.2
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Peter Hampf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JW When launching TB in OTFE Pwd mode, the initial password screen has a
JW small dark gray area on the bottom left side.
I guess you are talking about this:
Yes, that is what I am talking about. Just now I tried it with my
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Peter Hampf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Answering a current message (Thursday, April 10, 2008, 16:46)
JW When launching TB in OTFE Pwd mode, the initial password screen has a
JW small dark gray area on the bottom left side.
I guess you are talking about this:
By
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Paul Van Noord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JW I am not clear on why there are these language changes: Start-up
JW versus Master Password and input versus enter. Wherever
JW possible, consistent language and grammar is probably better.
They're different passwords
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Paul Van Noord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/11/2008 Jay Walker wrote:
JW Sorry, Paul, but I don't follow you. What is the different purpose? In
JW both cases, is not the purpose to gain access to TB and its stored
JW information? And are not the actions
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Jay Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
until 3.99, You could select messages in messages list or in finder
and
drag them to editor window, message were attached as MIME
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Paul Van Noord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are Master, Account Token PIN passwords used in TB to gain
access to the program and/or specific accounts.
I mentioned that this smudge occurs on the Master Password dialog
box. Peter confirmed that it occurs on
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
