Re[2]: Dual address books

Hello Marck, Thursday, January 19, 2006, 6:03:58 AM, you wrote: MDP Dear Jack, MDP @19-Jan-2006, 05:41 -0600 (19-Jan 11:41 here) Jack S. LaRosa [JSL] in MDP mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Bats!: JSL Since I have two different address books for the two accounts, why JSL does the CREATE A NEW

Re[4]: Old address books in new v3.64

, it hasn't. Anybody? -- TIA Best regards, Jackmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Now running TB! v3.64.01 Christmas Edition from Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 - Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http

Re[2]: Old address books in new v3.64

to this. -- Best regards, Jackmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Now running TB! v2.11.02 from Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 - Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.64.01 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Re[2]: Old address books in new v3.64

them. -- Best regards, Jackmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Now running TB! v2.11.02 from Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 - Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.64.01 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Re: spam locking TheBat!

of the email wouldn't display, I could delete it. -- Best regards, Jackmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Now running TB! v2.11.02 from Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 - Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL

Auto forwarding

of my fellow list members to suggest a way to do this. May all enjoy a Happy Thanksgiving! -- TIA, Jack LaRosa mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Conveying information with The Bat! ver: 2.11.02 Operating? with Windows XP Pro ver 5 build 2600 Service Pack 2

Re[2]: K9

Hello Bob, Sunday, November 6, 2005, 2:45:39 AM, you wrote: BM G'day Jack, BM Sunday, November 6, 2005, 5:49:37 AM, you wrote: Hello Bob, Saturday, November 5, 2005, 12:22:30 AM, you wrote: Well, I set K9's limit to 10,000KB (which should be 10megs) and ticked the box. I then sent

Re[2]: K9

to give TB another chance, I told TB to try fetching again. This time it did fetch the whole message including the large attachments. I hate intermittent problems. -- Best regards, Jackmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Now running TB! v2.11.02 from Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600

Re[2]: K9

Hello Alexander, Saturday, November 5, 2005, 2:01:30 PM, you wrote: ASK Hello Jack S. LaRosa everyone else, ASK on 05-Nov-2005 at 20:49 you (Jack S. LaRosa) wrote: Well, I set K9's limit to 10,000KB (which should be 10megs) and ticked the box. I then sent myself the same 6meg message ASK

Re[2]: K9

Hello Bob, Thursday, November 3, 2005, 11:31:51 PM, you wrote: BM G'day Jack, BM Friday, November 4, 2005, 1:42:39 PM, you wrote: BM snipped I looked all over K9 but could not find any setting which restricted receipt of large emails. Did I miss something or have any others of you had

K9

had similar problems? -- TIA, Jack LaRosa mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Conveying information with The Bat! ver: 2.11.02 Operating? with Windows XP Pro ver 5 build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.62.09 | 'Using

Re[2]: Filters

Hello Roelof, Friday, October 28, 2005, 3:57:01 AM, you wrote: RO Hallo Jack, RO On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:09:13 -0500GMT (28-10-2005, 4:09 +0200, where I RO live), you wrote: JSL Roelof, your suggestion looked considerably more elegant and I tried JSL to make it work but, alas, it wouldn't. I

Re[2]: Filters

Hello Roelof, Thursday, October 27, 2005, 6:11:10 AM, you wrote: RO Hallo Jack, RO On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 05:47:41 -0500GMT (26-10-2005, 12:47 +0200, where RO I live), you wrote: JSL I see that I have accidently mislead everyone by the content of my JSL original text. I used the words individual

Re[2]: Filters

Hello Mica, Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 9:38:04 AM, you wrote: MM -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MM Hash: RIPEMD160 MM***^\ ._)~~ MM ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Tue, 25 Oct 2005, MM@ @ at 05:58:49 -0500, when Jack S. LaRosa wrote: I can't seem to figure out how

Re[2]: Filters

Hello Bill, Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 11:46:01 AM, you wrote: BM On Tue, 2005-10-25, Jack S. LaRosa wrote: I can't seem to figure out how to get a single filter to route incoming mail to individual folders based on the sender field. I have one name in the RULE tab under FILTERING STRINGS

Re[3]: Filters

to do be any easier with a later version of TB? -- Best regards, Jackmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Now running TB! v2.11.02 from Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 - Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL

Filters

folder. Any ideas on what I'm doing wrong? -- TIA, Jack LaRosa mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Conveying information with The Bat! ver: 2.11.02 Operating? with Windows XP Pro ver 5 build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.60.7

Re[2]: Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

Sunday, August 7, 2005, 5:45:34 AM, you wrote: Hello Handsome Jack Morrison everyone else, on 07-Aug-2005 at 00:57 you (Handsome Jack Morrison) wrote: Will there be conflicts because of that, if and when I ever do attempt to re-import the old data into my new version of TB? If you want

Re[2]: Reward offered!

to say... -- Best regards, Jack Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[4]: Reward offered!

how you like it! I have to tag along with you though, and slap you upside the head with a fish every several seconds. My boss doesn't think you'll buy the car if I don't. Give me a break. -- Best regards, Jack Current version is 3.51.10

Re[2]: Reward offered!

the threads before commenting! -- Best regards, Jack Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Jack's announces his new upgrade policy for TB

Jack will next upgrade his two copies of The Bat to newer versions only three years *after* all of the following things occur: 1. It snows in Miami, Florida in August. 2. A cure for cancer is found. 3. The Chicago Cubs win the World Series. 4. Microsoft files for bankruptcy protection. 5. Osama

Re[2]: Jack's announces his new upgrade policy for TB

Sunday, August 7, 2005, 4:30:46 PM, you wrote: [] And maybe not even then. Give it a rest. No thanks. You are getting quite boring. Then don't bother to read my posts. Easy, right? Or do you just enjoy ankle-biting? That's what I thought. -- Best regards, Jack

Re[4]: Jack's announces his new upgrade policy for TB

Sunday, August 7, 2005, 5:23:03 PM, you wrote: Jack, Give it a rest. No thanks. Please reconsider and move on. I'm sure Roelof or Marck will eventually agree, too. That's always possible. I'd accept it, of course, but I wouldn't understand it. Unless, of course, you're only welcome

Re[2]: New version of The Bat won't load!

Sunday, August 7, 2005, 5:30:54 PM, you wrote: Hallo Jack, On Sun, 7 Aug 2005 15:13:36 -0400GMT (7-8-2005, 21:13 +0200, where I live), you wrote: It means, just go ahead with what you are doing anyway. Forget about the registry key (that .reg file) you have. You don't need it any more

Re[2]: Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

Sunday, August 7, 2005, 5:13:44 PM, you wrote: Hello Handsome Jack Morrison everyone else, on 07-Aug-2005 at 20:14 you (Handsome Jack Morrison) wrote: And btw. - when you copy the old account folders and their subfolders back into place, you'll also restore your old messages

Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

10 e-mail accounts it was directed. I tried to enter my 2.0 key, but it wouldn't accept it. I have faithfully upgraded (and paid for) the latest version of The Bat ever since I first started using The Bat (sometimes to my dismay). How can I get this resolved? -- Best regards, Jack

Re[2]: Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

Saturday, August 6, 2005, 12:23:32 PM, you wrote: On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 12:11 -0400, Handsome Jack Morrison wrote: How can I get this resolved? You can restore the registry backup you've made, it will contain the registration information. But I have to restore all of it or none

Re[2]: Reward offered!

software (at least those that I've ever used) companies use. None. Nada. Zilch. Zero. -- Best regards, Jack Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: New version of The Bat won't load!

not a scoflaw by nature. No, I'm not in a very good mood right now. And if you think that you're annoyed... Jack -Original Message- From: Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Aug 5, 2005 9:10 AM To: Handsome Jack Morrison on TBUDL TBUDL@thebat.dutaint.com Subject: Re: New version

Re: New version of The Bat won't load!

be it. -- Jack Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: New version of The Bat won't load!

Marek appears to have abandoned me. Does anyone else have any ideas about how I can get my Bat back? Thanks! Jack -Original Message- From: Handsome Jack Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Jul 29, 2005 5:28 PM To: tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com Subject: Re: New version of The Bat won't load

Re: New version of The Bat won't load!

Marek, I did what you recommended last night, but The Bat still freezes up at the splash screen. This is the error message I get: szAppName : thebat.exe szAppVer : 3.51.10.0 szModName : hungapp szModVer : 0.0.0.0 offset : Any other ideas? Jack -Original

Re: New version of The Bat won't load!

Marek, I tried what you recommended last night, but TB still freezes at the splash screen and won't load. This is the error message I get: szAppName : thebat.exe szAppVer : 3.51.10.0 szModName : hungapp szModVer : 0.0.0.0 offset : Any other ideas? -- Jack

Re: New version of The Bat won't load!

Marek, okay. Tonight I'll find the account.srb file, back it up, remove it, and then try to load TB again. I assume if it helps, send it to me means that I should send you a copy of the account.srb file, if this works? Thanks again for your help, Marek. Jack -Original Message- From

Re: New version of The Bat won't load!

Marek, it didn't work. I got this MS error message: AppName: thebat.exe AppVer: 3.51.10.0 ModName: thebat.exe ModVer: 3.51.10.0 Offset: 005d1d4a Is there anything else I could try? I'm still dead in the water. Thanks! Jack -Original Message- From: Marek Mikus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

New version of The Bat won't load!

Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

New version won't load...

uninstall the program to get around this, will I be able to get up and running again with an old backup (after downloading a 3.5 version, instead of 3.5.1, and starting over)? Will the new installation still be able to find my old registration key? Help! -- Jack

Re: New version of The Bat won't load!

-Original Message- From: Marek Mikus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Jul 28, 2005 8:38 AM To: tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com Subject: Re: New version of The Bat won't load! Hello all, Thursday, July 28, 2005, Handsome Jack Morrison wrote: ...nothing... Oh, come on now. It was more than nothing

Re: New version of The Bat won't load!

-Original Message- From: Marek Mikus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Jul 28, 2005 9:28 AM To: tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com Subject: Re: New version of The Bat won't load! Hello all, Thursday, July 28, 2005, Handsome Jack Morrison wrote: The program FREEZES at the opening splash screen. try

Re: Help! My Address book has disappeared! (after upgrading to vs 3.5)

Jack Morrison @ 2005-Jun-5 7:31:37 PM Help! My Address book has disappeared! (after upgrading to vs 3.5) mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm going out now and have a few cold ones, in celebration of the Return of My Address Book. How about you backup at the same time? Heh. Yep, not only have I

Copy and Paste for Asian languages and unicode

paste to TB! without a problem. I'm using 2.12. Is there any solution to this problem? These are plain text messages. -- Best regards, Jack Current version is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Multiple address books

book won't appear when the CREATE A NEW MESSAGE pull-down FAVORITES is accessed from the other account? I hope the previous paragraph made some sense. -- Best regards, Jackmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Now running TB! v2.11.02 from Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 - Service

Multiple address books

and making it an address book all by itself. So now there are three address books: mine, hers, and the one created from her 'group'. Although this arrangement works, I know it's a kludge which annoys me. Can anyone extricate me from this morass? -- TIA, Jack LaRosa mailto:[EMAIL

Encoding and CopyPaste

to this problem? ÄãºÃ ??o? -- Best regards, Jack Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: [Query] Norton AntiVirus and The Bat!

me. -- Best regards, Jackmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Now running TB! v2.11.02 from Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 - Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Re[2]: Save decrypted PGP messages?

settings, and installing GPG. I do prefer that TB will add back the feature they took out in V3. With 1.6x version, I can do that but some of the folders created in 2.x can not be seen. -- Best regards, Jack Wednesday, October 6, 2004, 10:34:34 PM, you wrote: KC -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE

Re[2]: Save decrypted PGP messages?

Hello Kevin, Thanks again, Kevin. I think I should try your solution, before RitLabs put back that feature. TB! integrates with PGP fairly well. Does it work smoothly with GPG, too? Does GPGRelay support multiple accounts well? -- Best regards, Jack Thursday, October 7, 2004, 2:26:10 PM, you

Save decrypted PGP messages?

in 2.x. I would upgrade just because of this feature, because most of my emails are PGPed and it's so annoying to decrypt before viewing any of them. At least, make it an option. -- Best regards, Jack Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL

ASMTP?

for years now), and if I can no longer use The Bat!, I need to start looking for a new provider... -- Best regards, Jack mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http

Re[2]: TB getting slow, taking lots of memory (with lots of emails in store)

MDP Agreed - I top folders out at around 20k mails as a maximum. I use MDP purging and Alternate Delete to keep folders to a reasonable size and MDP maintain a timely archive. Oh, how to alternate delete and archive? I didn't see those in the menus -- Jack

Re[2]: TB getting slow, taking lots of memory (with lots of emails in store)

d Have you installed any plugins? remove plugins, TB might speed up. I don't remember I installed any. How can I find out? -- Jack Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

TB getting slow, taking lots of memory (with lots of emails in store)

for reading emails. I'm using 2.12. I hope TB will come up with a solution that accesses HD and uses memory in a smart way to make the footprint minimum. Jack Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Fwd: Re[2]: Folder settings

This is a forwarded message From: Jack S. LaRosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Allie Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wednesday, August 11, 2004, 6:14:24 PM Subject: Folder settings ===8==Original message text=== Hello Allie, Wednesday, August 11, 2004, 7:55:42 AM, you wrote: AM

Re[2]: Folder settings

Hello Allie, Tuesday, August 10, 2004, 7:14:14 PM, you wrote: AM Jack S. Larosa, [JSL] wrote: I have just noticed that my The Bat! folder is no longer expunging old messages. I have the parameters set as follows: Keep messages in base for 2 days On exit remove old messages (box checked

Re[2]: Folder settings

Hello Allie, Wednesday, August 11, 2004, 7:55:42 AM, you wrote: AM Jack S. Larosa, [JSL] wrote: I'm ashamed to admit that I don't know the difference and don't know how to find out. AM Ashamed??!! That isn't a word in the vocabulary used on this list. :) AM Hit Shift-CTRL-P to bring up

Folder settings

on this? -- TIA, Jack LaRosa mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Conveying information with The Bat! ver: 2.11.02 Operating? with Windows XP Pro ver 5 build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http

Re: Compressing folders

coded that way. Hopefully they will see this as something worth adding. -- Jack Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Compressing folders

that every once in a while. -- Jack Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Having trouble setting up acount

program, I would rather use TB. I don't want my personal information showing up in the header of the mails I send out. When a customer receives an email from me, I want it to appear as if it came from my webmail account. I don't know if that is possible but that is what I am trying to do. -- Jack

Re: Having trouble setting up acount

seem to recall reading on here that that field is mainly for display purposes but I could be remembering wrong. -- Jack Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Having trouble setting up acount

with providing a professional appearance to the buyer. -- Jack Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Having trouble setting up acount

this to be hidden so that all correspondence goes to the sites address. Is there a way to accomplish this or should I just stick with using webmail? -- Jack Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Re: POP3 then IMAP and back to POP3?

have to enter a password for it every time I start TB. It's a real pain and no one here knew how to fix it. So, from my experience, I wouldn't try it with working accounts if I were you. -- Jack Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL

Re: POP3 then IMAP and back to POP3?

Hello, I tried this at one point, trying to isolate a problem. I have three AM I see you're using v1.62. Is that the version you're referring to? v2 AM is different. IMAP is completely redone and that sort of switching is AM no longer possible. Yes, I was speaking of v1.62. -- Jack

Re: mailing list address

Hello, J I saw mention on here sometime back about another mailing list for TB. PB Maybe you are thinking of the Canadian one: My thanks to everyone that replied. This is the one I was thinking of. -- Jack Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using

mailing list address

Hello, I saw mention on here sometime back about another mailing list for TB. I tried searching the archives but using the term mailing list returns pretty much everything. Does anyone have an address for that list? -- Jack Current version

Re: mailing list address

/TBUDLInfo.html, they are all FW described there. No, the one I am talking about isn't listed there. At least I cannot find it. I seem to recall it was started by someone in Canada, not that that matters, but it was mentioned several times on this list. -- Jack

Re: Spam, Bayes It, Kludges, white list, balck list... : French need help !

/ -- Best regards, Jackmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Now running TB! v2.11.02 from Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 - Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Intermittent filter

to the FAUX INBOX. Even doing a manual re-filter, the messages remain in the INBOX. Needless to say, (so why am I saying it?) the nonsense string *does not* appear in the subject line of either message. Anyone have any idea why the filter might fail on a message? -- Best regards, Jack

Re[2]: Your attachments

. As you can see, I've since upgraded. The aforementioned attachments now appear as 'PART.TXT', -- Best regards, Jackmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Now running TB! v2.11.02 from Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 - Service Pack 1

Re: Can someone tell me what this means?

Hello Jack, MDP ... the reverse DNS for your domain specified a mail exchange MDP computer called ohmx-2.columbus.rr.com. When the RITlabs mail MDP exchanger attempted to connect back to it to verify its existence, MDP it failed. As a result, your message was rejected. This is a MDP standard

Re: Can someone tell me what this means?

get an answer on this list. Is there somewhere else I can ask about my problem? TS I could try again with me as From, and you (Jack) as reply TS to, or even create a [EMAIL PROTECTED] specially for the TS purpose... Shall I do that? I would certainly appreciate it. TS The alternative is to try

Re: Can someone tell me what this means?

or the support sites for them. I could call up my ISP but saying I can't deliver mail to one address probably won't elicit much help from them. What should I do to track this problem down? -- Jack Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL

New Key Checksum codes

Hello , OK, I just downloaded and installed (over my old 1.xx version) the latest version of TB!. I find that I can't use my old Key and Checksum codes with this new version. What do I have to do to get new codes? Do I have to actually purchase TB! again? -- Best regards, Jack

Re[2]: New Key Checksum codes

Hello Melissa, Monday, June 7, 2004, 3:29:26 PM, you wrote: MR Hi Jack, MR On Monday, June 07, 2004, at 1:18:40 PM PST, you wrote: What do I have to do to get new codes? Do I have to actually purchase TB! again? MR Yes. There was a period of time when users of v1.x could get a Thanks

Re[2]: New Key Checksum codes

are still on the web page and I followed through the purchase procedure just as though they hadn't expired yet. We'll see what happens. Thanks to all. -- Best regards, Jackmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Now running TB! v2.11.02 from Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 - Service

Can someone tell me what this means?

]... recipient denied, because no connection with MX 10 'ohmx-2.columbus.rr.com.' [24.28.193.149] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]. -- Jack Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Your attachments

or is it just me? -- Best regards, Jackmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Lumbering along with The Bat! v1.61 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 - Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http

Support from RitLabs

Hello, Does anyone know of a valid email address for RitLabs that I can use to get a question answered? Their web site says to use [EMAIL PROTECTED] or the Help-Feedback-Information Request option in the menu. I've tried them both but the messages come back as non-deliverable. -- Jack http

Re: GMane - here we come

it? *Provided one's news service chooses to carry this new newsgroup. -- Best regards, Jack Using The Bat! 2.04.7 on Windows 5.1 (2600) Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http

Re: GMane - here we come

, and quite nicely, too. Plus, it's FREE. -- Best regards, Jack Using The Bat! 2.04.7 on Windows 5.1 (2600) Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Re[2]: GMane - here we come

Monday, March 8, 2004, 12:36:37 PM, you wrote: Dear Jack, @8-Mar-2004, 12:11 -0600 (08-Mar 18:11 UK time) Jack Morrison [JM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: JM Marck, I missed most of the original discussions regarding this JM subject, so I have a few questions. Okay - shoot. duck

Re[2]: GMane - here we come

Does anyone have the name of this new Gmane newsgroup yet? -- Best regards, Jack Using The Bat! 2.04.7 on Windows 5.1 (2600) Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http

Re[3]: GMane - here we come

is believing: http://gmane.org/tmda.php -- Best regards, Jack Using The Bat! 2.04.7 on Windows 5.1 (2600) Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Re[2]: GMane - here we come

of all of your children. :) -- Best regards, Jack Using The Bat! 2.04.7 on Windows 5.1 (2600) Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Unequal gaps

Friday, March 5, 2004, 8:43:31 PM, you wrote: Hello Jack, On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 13:11:40 -0600 GMT (06/03/2004, 02:11 +0700 GMT), Jack Morrison wrote: Is it possible for the nice folks at Ritlabs to do something about the differences in the gaps that separate the various information panels

Re[2]: Unequal gaps

. -- Best regards, Jack Using The Bat! 2.04.7 on Windows 5.1 (2600) Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[3]: Unequal gaps

enough to drive anal-retentive SOBs like me crazy (no, it wasn't a very long drive). -- Best regards, Jack Using The Bat! 2.04.7 on Windows 5.1 (2600) Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL

Re[2]: Unequal gaps

, to be exact. ;) -- Best regards, Jack Using The Bat! 2.04.7 on Windows 5.1 (2600) Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Unequal gaps

Saturday, March 6, 2004, 3:23:22 PM, you wrote: [] JM Rumor has it that some people even liked the looks of the AMC Pacer, JM too. JM Four people, to be exact. ;) Is that a car or a PDA? It's a car that looked like a PDA. :) -- Best regards, Jack Using The Bat! 2.04.7 on Windows 5.1

Re[2]: Unequal gaps

, elegant, clear, simple -- and beautiful. Likewise, Dialog, Outlook, WS-FTP, etc. and just about any other modern program out there with a similar layout. Take a look at them and see for yourself. Pacer...Ferrari...Pacer...Ferrari. Sounds like a no-brainer to me. -- Best regards, Jack Using The Bat

Re[2]: Unequal gaps

Saturday, March 6, 2004, 7:02:04 PM, you wrote: Hi MAU, on Sun, 7 Mar 2004 01:45:39 +0100GMT, you wrote: M With all due respect Jack, this is one of the most annoying threads I've M ever read. Long but content empty. Come on! Be serious! Most people want M an email client to send and receive

Re[4]: Unequal gaps

Saturday, March 6, 2004, 7:48:38 PM, you wrote: Hello Jack! On Saturday, March 06, 2004, 7:30 PM, you wrote: JM Shame on me! Yes, Jack, for using unwarranted sarcasm in a discussion that is mainly about personal preferences. Boy, we just don't see the world through the same prism, do we

Re[4]: Unequal gaps

Saturday, March 6, 2004, 8:03:46 PM, you wrote: At 8:30 PM on 3/6/2004, Jack Morrison typed ... J And lastly, I apologize for apologizing so much. So anyone who questions your observations is opposed to constructive criticism? Martin, Thomas, Stefan, and Greg were all able to question my

Re[2]: Unequal gaps

* like things that not only work well, but look good, too. Again, shame on me! I don't have any problem with your aesthetic approach, but I personally just don't care. Well, you apparently cared enough to ridicule me about it, didn't you? -- Best regards, Jack Using The Bat! 2.04.7 on Windows

Re[6]: Unequal gaps

? Are you simply unable to consider more than one thing at a time? Note: If anyone here is interested in learning how to do more than one thing at a time, like chew gum and walk, please write me privately for FREE instructions! -- Best regards, Jack Using The Bat! 2.04.7 on Windows 5.1 (2600) Service

Unequal gaps

in the Connection Center! -- Best regards, Jack mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.04.7 on Windows 5.1 (2600) Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Account requires password

, the folder for that account is shown collapsed. If I click on it to open it, it the password dialog pops back up. Can someone please tell me what I need to do to fix this? -- Jack Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http

Re[5]: Toolbar(s)

Saturday, October 4, 2003, 12:07:23 PM, you wrote: Hi Jack Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 3:02:04 PM, you wrote: JM Any idea what flat toolbars even are? I haven't a clue. Look at the toolbars. And the menu names above. The toolbars are always elevated above the level of the menu names

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >