Hi,
Is it possible for the next/future release to include the ability of
adding multiple aliases in one hit goverened by repeated -i options?
eg:
valias -i [EMAIL PROTECTED] -i [EMAIL PROTECTED] and so on
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
where currently, only the last -i reference is the only alias
Hi,
Is it possible to have vmoduser modified so that changing a password
with a new -$option changes both encrypted and clear text passwords in
one run?
Sort of like: ./vmoduser [EMAIL PROTECTED] -P test
would change the password for [EMAIL PROTECTED] to test in both clear
text format
On Sep 20, 2007, at 12:19 AM, Quey wrote:
Is it possible to have vmoduser modified so that changing a
password with a new -$option changes both encrypted and clear
text passwords in one run?
It already does that. When you set the clear password, it also
updates the encrypted password.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Collins wrote:
I can't think of a time when you'd use the option to set the encrypted
password directly, but it's there in case someone needs it...
We've used it during conversions from other MTAs. It can be quite handy :)
- --
/*
Matt
Hi Tom,
Tom Collins wrote:
On Sep 20, 2007, at 12:19 AM, Quey wrote:
Is it possible to have vmoduser modified so that changing a password
with a new -$option changes both encrypted and clear text passwords
in one run?
It already does that. When you set the clear password, it also
Hi,
I used qmails per-user wildcard system. Using this,
I can do user dash something at host dot com. For example, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would like to continue to once I move to vpopmail. This
would have to be supported vdelivermail, I suppose, since the
On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 14:51, Dan Grigsby wrote:
Hi,
I used qmails per-user wildcard system. Using this, I can do user
dash something at host dot com. For example, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am writing a little hack for myself to rewrite the messages to have
a non-wildcard name and add an extra
Thanks! I'm sorry if it is/was a FAQ. I looked (I thought) thoroughly.
-Original Message-
From: Rick Romero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 2:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Feature request: per-user wildcards/catchall
On Thu, 2004-04-15
Erik Bourget wrote:
Paul L. Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Because vpopmail bridges so many divides, it cannot intuit what you want.
It doesn't know if you're using cdb for everything or using MySQL for
everything or whatever unless you tell it. But, wherever possible, it
should be DWIM.
Paul, quit emailing me offlist. I don't give a crap what kind of
drunken binge you are on.
Damm, I'll I did was offer a simple solution to a problem.
Just STFU and let it go.
Paul L. Allen wrote:
Erik Bourget writes:
You know, intense as this whole argument is, the fact remains that DWIM
is no substitute for proper documentation.
Let's see, the documentation says vaddaliasdomain original alias.
If you do what the documentation says, it works. If you reverse
Hello Red Herring
Nick Harring writes:
This whole argument is ridiculous.
Correct. So far I havw seen only one person post a sensible response,
You are NOT that person...
The correctness of design doesn't really rely on what some random users
first guess of how it should work would be,
A feature request for vaddaliasdomin. I would like a configure option
(best) or a command-line switch (not so good) that reverses the order of
the two arguments. I'd like it for two reasons:
1) It is then the same order as for ln (original, alias) so easier to
remember if they're that way
]
Subject: [vchkpw] Feature request for vaddaliasdomain
A feature request for vaddaliasdomin. I would like a
configure option
(best) or a command-line switch (not so good) that reverses
the order of the two arguments. I'd like it for two reasons:
1) It is then the same order
On Wednesday, September 24, 2003, at 09:16 AM, Paul L. Allen wrote:
A feature request for vaddaliasdomin. I would like a configure option
(best) or a command-line switch (not so good) that reverses the order
of
the two arguments. I'd like it for two reasons:
What if it was automatic
The worst one of our clients has managed so far is 13, added in dribs and
drabs of two or three at a time. For one it makes no difference. For
hundreds I'd go the perl script reading a text file route. For twos and
threes the current argument order of vaddaliasdomain is annoying.
Write a
You don't read so good, do you?
JB writes:
Write a shell script that takes the arguments in the order you want and
pass them to vaddaliasdomain in the order expected,
I already explained that while I am more than capable of coming up with
that idea and implementing it all by myself, that
feel too imposing.
Thanks in advance for the patch.
Lu
-Original Message-
From: Paul L. Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 3:07 PM
To: JB
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [vchkpw] Re: Feature request for vaddaliasdomain
You don't read so good
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gotta give this Paul guy a round of applause.
Indeed. I know you meant that ironically, but I understand your
misperceptions.
I have never seen anyone who uses his sheer incompetency as a brutal
attack weapon. Have you ?
Many, many times when I have dealt with
A one line bash script, which I provided will do the job for Millions of
people.
You could have fixed the problem yourself in less then 10 seconds,
instead, you flame me.
You are a fucking twit
Paul L. Allen wrote:
You don't read so good, do you?
JB writes:
Write a shell script that
JB writes:
A one line bash script, which I provided
Sorrry, I did not see your attachment in any of your posts. Please
repost it so that we all can benefit and the vpopmail maintainers can
distribute your wonderful script (if they think it is a sensible
solution).
will do the job for
Paul L. Allen wrote:
You don't read so good, do you?
snappy opener, i wonder what prompted this? whiners hate being called
whiners.
you are obviously a person who loves to whine and when not whining,
likes to rage.
am i correct in this? no need to reply, i'm confident in my analysis.
a better
with which you're infatuated. contribute something real.
send that 10 second script with your whiny feature request.
you really ought to apoligize to the list for your bad behavior.
Ummm, and a few other things you missed about Open Source. If I have
a feature request you dislike
Stop bickering please, common.
Difference between the origional and that what i changed around
Breached# diff vaddaliasdomain.c.backup vaddaliasdomain.c
56c56,57
printf(vaddaliasdomain: usage: [options] alias_domain
real_domain\n);
---
/* printf(vaddaliasdomain: usage: [options]
Hi,
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 23:31, Tom Collins wrote:
A feature request for vaddaliasdomin. I would like a configure option
(best) or a command-line switch (not so good) that reverses the order
of the two arguments. I'd like it for two reasons:
What if it was automatic?
A bit odd
Toasterz Admin writes:
Paul L. Allen wrote:
Toasterz Admin writes:
Actually, you're wrong.
how could i be wrong just because you say it's so.
What a wonderfully compelling argument. How could you possibly be
wrong just because I say so? Ummm, wait, you called me wrong
because YOU
Anders Brander writes:
A bit odd to document,
Damn right. I still haven't figured out a sensible usage message.
but otherwise a fabulous idea.
Bad Anders. Bad, bad, Anders. Letting people do what they find
easiest is BAD. Ask the people who criticised me for suggesting it.
Please
Stop bickering please, common.
Difference between the origional and that what i changed around
Breached# diff vaddaliasdomain.c.backup vaddaliasdomain.c
56c56,57
printf(vaddaliasdomain: usage: [options] alias_domain
real_domain\n);
---
/* printf(vaddaliasdomain: usage: [options]
Hi,
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 03:26, Paul L. Allen wrote:
A bit odd to document,
Damn right. I still haven't figured out a sensible usage message.
I think we should just ignore the old way of calling vaddaliasdomain
in the usage message, in that way new users will adobt the new way of
doing
Hi Anders
Anders Brander writes:
I think we should just ignore the old way of calling vaddaliasdomain
in the usage message, in that way new users will adobt the new way of
doing things.
Ummm, that implies that one way is more correct than the other. I do
not believe that to be the case. I
X-Istence writes:
This is my patch, it doesnt allow for both types, but does what you want
:).
It does do what I want, and if that were my only concern I have other
solutions that I could use. I would like both options to be available so
that those who have one preference can get exactly
Hi,
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 03:46, Paul L. Allen wrote:
I think we should just ignore the old way of calling vaddaliasdomain
in the usage message, in that way new users will adobt the new way of
doing things.
Ummm, that implies that one way is more correct than the other. I do
not believe
Hi Anders
Anders Brander writes:
Hummm Or something like:
... the two domains to be aliased ... - without saying which is which,
for the user it doesn't matter much.
Oh Anders, I need rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty! It's
because I'm a boring old fart that I desperately
It should be possible, with a change to vset_default_domain in
vpopmail.c (and maybe some other locations). Either that, or make sure
that other references to DEFAULT_DOMAIN are removed and
vset_default_domain is used instead.
Ok I will look into that, thank you.
Note that vpopmail will
Hi Anders,
Does anyone know a workaround until either vpopmail reads SSLREMOTEIP
or ucspi-ssl sets TCPREMOTEIP?
How about something like (untested):
(env TCPREMOTEIP=$SSLREMOTEIP /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw)
in your startup script instead of just
HI guys I know this is OT but is there a way that you may
know to have quota setting configuration only on specific domains? Maybe just specifying the option in the .qmailadmin
settings.
THANKS,
REMO
Hi out there,
I have a small feature request for vpopmail. Currently, I'm checking out
if I could successfully use ucspi-ssl instead of ucspi-tcp for accepting
network connections. Things are a lot easier with this tool, because you
can simple set up your SSL certificates and replace tcpserver
Hi,
On Monday 03 March 2003 00:44, Jonas Pasche wrote:
Does anyone know a workaround until either vpopmail reads SSLREMOTEIP
or ucspi-ssl sets TCPREMOTEIP?
How about something like (untested):
(env TCPREMOTEIP=$SSLREMOTEIP /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw)
in your startup script instead of just
On 3 Mar 2003, Jonas Pasche wrote:
The drawback is that tcpserver sets (besides others) the environment
variable TCPREMOTEIP, which vchkpw uses for logging and for opening
dynamic relays. sslserver from the ucspi-ssl package set SSLREMOTEIP
instead, which causes vchkpw to stop logging IP
Il 09:13, venerdì 7 febbraio 2003, Rhett Hermer ha scritto:
If djb doesn't want to improve qmail with all of those patches et al, then
what's stopping us to write new MTA based on qmail design? Is there any
restriction that I am not aware of?
I don't think that anybody here want to write
-Original Message-
From: Davide Giunchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 4:56 AM
To: Rhett Hermer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: Qmailadmin feature request
Il 09:13, venerdì 7 febbraio 2003, Rhett Hermer ha scritto:
If djb doesn't want
On Thursday 06 February 2003 01:49, Ken Jones wrote:
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 18:22, you wrote:
snip
It would be great if you knew of any C programmers with a few
hours to spare. then we could hook vpopmail into qmail-smtpd
and block the email right at the front door.
I know C, and I
Hey, one of my clients bought a domain which was previously held by
someone else. This of course meant that lots and lots of spammers were
sending mails to a couple addresses on that domain, and he'd like to be
able to mark certain explicit addresses for bouncing, while retaining the
And secondly, I don't like patches.
I believe you're using the wrong MTA if you don't like patches. :-)
Qmail is the a patchy mail server of mail servers.
Regards,
Andrew
On Thursday 06 February 2003 11:04, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
And secondly, I don't like patches.
I believe you're using the wrong MTA if you don't like patches. :-)
Qmail is the a patchy mail server of mail servers.
I keep hoping that will change sometime soon. :) I guess no-one has
released
I think that is time to create a qmail GPL project , qmail megapatch
project or something similiar a big patch developed in gpl'd like
project.
The problem is that patching a qmail mail server is very common, and when you
have to apply a lot of patch to the same source you can't do it
qmail-0.0.0.0
qmail-1.03-qmtpc
qmail-bouncecontrol
qmail-1.03-tls
netscape-progress
qmail-send.mimeheaders
qmail-pop3d+vpomail
yes, patch upon patches... the same thing that other's qmail administrator has
done. For this reaseon i've proposed the project described in my previous
mail
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Kohlsmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: Qmailadmin feature request
I believe you're using the wrong MTA if you don't like
patches. :-)
Qmail
yes, patch upon patches... the same thing that other's qmail administrator
has done. For this reaseon i've proposed the project described in my
previous mail about this thread.
Exactly. I'm saying I've _got_ a master patch that does this, and none of the
patches in the master list are
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 11:02:36 -0500 Andrew Kohlsmith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I would like to see is a update made to the qmail smtp daemon
so it will look up the email account and return a failure 500 message.
Then by default, the email addresses that don't match would be
Just out of genuine curiosity, were you actually seeing problems that
required each of those patches? I've been running a
qmail/vpopmail/sqwebmail/qmailadmin setup for the past year now and have
yet to actually find need for a patch.
Not problems per se, but rather features I would like to
Just out of genuine curiosity, were you actually seeing problems that
required each of those patches? I've been running a
qmail/vpopmail/sqwebmail/qmailadmin setup for the past year now and have
yet to actually find need for a patch.
There's a lot of needs that plain qmail doesn't suite our
- smtp-auth-relaying: useful for big lan with some external users
- smtp-after-pop: vpopmail feature that do this is good for small traffic
network, but when you have 100 or more concurrent connection to the pop3
you cannot use binary file but you must use a database.
I just use vpopmail and
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 18:22, you wrote:
Hey, one of my clients bought a domain which was previously held by someone
else. This of course meant that lots and lots of spammers were sending
mails to a couple addresses on that domain, and he'd like to be able to
mark certain explicit
Hello Ken,
On Thursday, February 6, 2003 at 7:49:33 AM you [KJ] wrote (at least
in part):
It would be great if you knew of any C programmers with a few
hours to spare. then we could hook vpopmail into qmail-smtpd
and block the email right at the front door.
You might have missed it, but
Hello,
I want to know your opinion about including this patch like an option
(selecting in configure) on vpopmail code. Spammers generate a lot of traffic
of emails to unknown users and server could stop it with this. Performance
seems to be normal. Opinions?
http://www.interazioni.it/qmail/
Hi Eduardo,
my patch basically modifies qmail-smtpd.c code, using vpopmail libraries.
So, it may be seen practically in the category qmail patch, not vpopmail
patch.
As any patch, it may not work if someone applied other patches before, so I
don't think it may be right to include it in
Hi Brian,
the versions you see on my website are tailored for vpopmail, so they
handle every kind of user vpopmail handles, valias and .qmail aliases,
ezmlm mailing lists.
It may be easily customized for other handlers. A lot of people asked me,
and they realized the same control out of
On Thursday 10 October 2002 20:15, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
probably not possible. but i was wondering if there's any way an additional
'comment' field could be added to vpopmail. reasoning: we have one 'main'
domain where customers who don't have their own domain can get a personal
email
You can add as many additional fields as desired if you run the vpopmail
with the MySQL backend
Michael.
- Original Message -
From: Paul Theodoropoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 4:15 AM
Subject: [vchkpw] feature request
probably
(publicly available on my web site) to
query the
MySQL database directly so constantly updating those files is a waste of
CPU and disk.
Code changes to accomplish this are at:
http://matt.simerson.net/computing/qmail/vpopmail-4.9.10-opensmtp-patch.txt
Third: Feature Request:
First: Bug fix.
Fix the vdelivermail crashing problem I described a while back:
postmaster set's user account bob as default delivery.
user deletes bob's pop account
messages delivered by default rule (for bobs maildir) crash
vdelivermail.
If a
Andras Kende wrote:
Hello,
Is anyone can help me with this:
latest development vpopmail 4.9.9
./configure --enable-ip-alias-domains=y
trying to use vipmap:
./vipmap -a 216.179.218.21 kende.net
./vipmap -a 216.179.218.X domain1.com
but
./vipmap -p doesn't printy out
Dear All
I used vmkpasswd to recreate the vpasswd.cdb files as I hade moved
vpopmail from one machine to another, and changed the install dir to
/var/vpopmail.
When run it changes the owner/group to whom ever is running it (in my
case root). I did not notice this and it then broke bits of
Greg Cope wrote:
Dear All
I used vmkpasswd to recreate the vpasswd.cdb files as I hade moved
vpopmail from one machine to another, and changed the install dir to
/var/vpopmail.
When run it changes the owner/group to whom ever is running it (in my
case root). I did not notice this and
Ken Jones wrote:
Greg Cope wrote:
Dear All
I used vmkpasswd to recreate the vpasswd.cdb files as I hade moved
vpopmail from one machine to another, and changed the install dir to
/var/vpopmail.
When run it changes the owner/group to whom ever is running it (in my
case root).
, how should i debug what happening???
Thanks :)
Andras
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Jones" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Greg Cope" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "vchkpw / vpopmail mailing list" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 7:53 AM
Subj
on 3/12/01 3:28 PM, Matt Simerson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have two issues: The first is a feature request for the vmoduser program.
It appears that at present there is no way to disable qmailadmin. This would
be a most welcome addition to the vmoduser program and hopefully more people
I have two issues: The first is a feature request for the vmoduser program.
It appears that at present there is no way to disable qmailadmin. This would
be a most welcome addition to the vmoduser program and hopefully more people
than I would find it useful to be able to easily disable a domains
I'd really really love to see the POP3 'Index' feature
make it's way into the forwarding accounts list. I
have hundreds of forwards on one domain but only about
10 pop3's, so the index is in the wrong place for me. :-)
Dave
define what you mean pattern - a reg exp - not really possible to do in
mysql i believe (though i could be wrong) - just look for a string? -
definatley easy to do then
Eric
-- Support your government, give Echelon / Carnivore something to parse --
classfield top-secret government restricted
Hi Ken,
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/vpopmail-4.9.4'
gcc -g -O2 -Wall -o vmkpasswd vmkpasswd.o libvpopmail.a
-L/usr/local/lib -ll
dap -llber -lnsl -lcrypt
vmkpasswd.o: In function `main':
/usr/local/src/vpopmail-4.9.4/vmkpasswd.c:64: undefined reference to
`vmkpasswd'
I haven't figured out how to modify the makefiles for that.
the vmkpasswd program is only available for the cdb module.
Edit the Makefile and delete the reference to vmkpasswd
That will allow the make file to finish
Ken
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ken,
make[2]: Entering directory
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
H... From field look strange.
Of Ken Jones
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 4:39 AM
To: Svyatoslav Trukhanov
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Feature request
Svyatoslav Trukhanov wrote
I have large mail system, use qmail+vpopmail+MySQL
All is Ok, but
when new mail for user arrived vdelivermail connect to MySQL and get home
dir
for this user. I think this is bottleneck on my system. (MySQL located not
on the same machine, when mailboxes).
I think maybe this features will be
Svyatoslav Trukhanov wrote:
I have large mail system, use qmail+vpopmail+MySQL
All is Ok, but
when new mail for user arrived vdelivermail connect to MySQL and get home
dir
for this user. I think this is bottleneck on my system. (MySQL located not
on the same machine, when mailboxes).
Johan Almqvist wrote:
Hey
All v* programs should print their version number if called with -v
-Johan
--
Johan Almqvist
Done:
4.9.2
Sep 6 - add version switch to all v* programs, either with -v option
or in the default usage statement
Done
ChangeLog
Sep 6 - vadddomain prints out usage statement if no domain is specified
Bill Shupp wrote:
Also, it would be cool if vadddomain would print usage syntax if no arguments
are supplied. Currently, it tried to add an unspecified domain.
-Bill Shupp
Quoting Johan Almqvist
al Message-
From: Chris Fankhauser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 9:11 AM
To: Mark Chesney
Cc: vpopmail; qmailadmin
Subject: Re: feature request
I think that is even more obscure than the user%somedomain.com naming
scheme. Imagine how much trouble you'd ha
creates
too many problems and support issues. so many common mail clients choke on
delimiters, that there must be a better solution.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Beuchler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 9:15 AM
To: vpopmail; qmailadmin
Subject: Re: feature request
t, Inc.
+1 (734) 513-7707 x 2012
-Original Message-
From: Mark Chesney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 2:09 PM
To: vpopmail; qmailadmin
Subject: RE: feature request
a small service provider with more mail hosts than ip addresses would be
able to achieve an effe
Mark Chesney wrote:
a small service provider with more mail hosts than ip addresses would be
able to achieve an effect similar to the ip aliasing option. or suppose a
service provider doesn't want to allocate numerous ip's just for the sake of
mail. the requirement of a delimiter whether it
Mark Chesney wrote:
currently, in order to avoid the %domain pop user naming scheme, the only
choice is ip aliasing, which requires an ip for each and every domain.
sometimes this is unrealistic or unachievable. why not create a system where
pop usernames can be unique, but not so clunky.
On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 09:05:50AM -0700, Mark Chesney wrote:
currently, in order to avoid the %domain pop user naming scheme, the only
choice is ip aliasing, which requires an ip for each and every domain.
sometimes this is unrealistic or unachievable. why not create a system where
pop
84 matches
Mail list logo
