the pure unadulterated trash that tends to come in
> whenever a Tor exit node is missed in the routine lockdowns.
Risker, example of "pure unadulterated trash" edits on Wikipedia, or are we
just to take your word for it?
You know, how ab
ven't done anything bad is done by
administrative hall monitors with too much time on their hands for no good
reason?
I am grateful though that John pledges solemnly to observe WP:BEANS.
Trillium Corsage
05.06.2017, 18:44, "David Gerard" :
> Editing may be a tricky one, particular
he may be
confident it was not merely a "conversations I "say" I have had."
It is accurate though that I erred by recalling that the list moderator
suggested I was "trolling" when he actually used the word "baiting."
Trillium Corsage
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at
; (i.e.
"this might take a couple days") rather than his preferred formulation "couple
*of* days"
C) Put it up for a consensus vote among the other list moderators.
I see the list has some new moderators, but I figure odds are this email will
be stopped as well.
Trillium Corsag
identification.
Trillium Corsage
29.07.2016, 22:26, "Ed Erhart" :
> I regret to inform everyone that Kevin Gorman, a Wikipedian who was the
> first Wikipedian-in-residence at a US university or college, has passed
> away. There is a memorial page on Facebook, and editors are le
ed editors, and as well the thousands and
thousands of perma-blocked IP editors in this nearly completely unaccountable
administrative system that attracts some of the worse kind of psychologies
imaginable.
Trillium Corsage
05.06.2016, 17:49, "Pine W" :
> Hi Pax and Pete
itself is modify and update the terms of service,
give advise to the board, coordinate with WMF Trust and Safety in the banning
of certain editors, and handle routine inquiries.
Trillium Corsage
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
http
r? If it's not possible to
selectively prohibit, how about an on/off switch, i.e. *no-one* may watchlist
an editor's individual talkpage.
Trillium Corsage
21.05.2016, 02:20, "Johan Jönsson" :
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 1:06 AM, Danny Horn wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>&
n.org/w/index.php?title=Cookie_statement&action=historysubmit&type=revision&diff=105722&oldid=104960.
Trillium Corsage
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New message
ich didn't, and which introduced the motion. Is this secret HR stuff that
would embarrass Lila? It doesn't seem that way to me. There've been a dozen
news stories on her leaving, and none have reported it was on wonderful terms
all around. So what's the big deal?
Publ
should publish the
minutes or let it be known otherwise which trustee initiated (and which
seconded) (and which opposed if any) the call for the ED's resignation.
Trillium Corsage
16.04.2016, 02:23, "Risker" :
> I think they already have been - by Patricio's email and public p
like another trustee should be criticized for violating any
confidence, after all Wikimedia prides itself on transparency.
Trillium Corsage
16.03.2016, 12:17, "Andreas Kolbe" :
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:13 AM, John Mark Vandenberg
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:5
could decipher really is that
boardmember Samuel Klein raised the motion to remove the requirement.
Trillium Corsage
03.03.2016, 16:22, "Brion Vibber" :
> On Mar 3, 2016 8:19 AM, "Pete Forsyth" wrote:
>> Enjoying this discussion, glad to see it happening. One quest
Hang tough, Lila Tretikov. This will all pass. These people leaving blaming
you, bah! You are cleaning the WMF cupboard, and that's overdue. Don't let
anybody or anything psyche you out.
Trillium Corsage
19.02.2016, 21:31, "Wikipedia Signpost" :
> Special report:
ties.
Horrendous I know and tends to shows that Arbcom and the rest of Enwiki
administrative structure genuinely have a problem with women, which they are
often alleged to (i.e. in Gamergate and all that).
Trillium Corsage
PS: A similar thing happened to editor Kiefer Wolfowitz. After s
perior.
>
> --
> James Heilman
> MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
Not necessarily disbelieving you, but can you point to a single, concrete
example of a "paid editor replacing a deadlink with a link to the spam site
copied from waybackmachine?" I'd like to
y.
Really, you should have a look at the seamier side of (at least) English
WIkipedia. There are people, particularly among the administrative set, with
null interest in articles but consumed with interpersonal conflict and
targeting of others. It's
unity members" as
"way more important than readers." Seems pretty brazen and non-inclusive to me,
and illustrative of the attitudes of the administrative set.
Trillium Corsage
02.12.2015, 16:36, "Todd Allen" :
> That's nice. Do you want me to explicitly sa
onal and unsourced obvious advocacy articles. Or if, like Bosch
Sensortec, they tended actually to be pretty good. Unfortunately the
Orangemoody investigation's team has decided they must remain unavailable to
the public, allegedly to protect the article subjects from repeat alleged
victimizati
deshis and other easterners just
trying to put food on the table for their kids.
Trillium Corsage
02.09.2015, 21:53, "Matt Campbell" :
> Glad to hear it.
>
> Original message
> From: James Heilman
> Date: 09/01/2015 10:31 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: Wikimed
te to all: the link provided doesn't contain a sexual image, though the image
under discussion must be.
Trillium Corsage
11.06.2015, 19:31, "Trillium Corsage" :
> Todd, since you credit yourself as a collaborative creator of a
> world-historic educational work, what are som
administrative
achievements or are some of the bad Wikipedia participants you have blocked?
Trillium Corsage
10.06.2015, 21:54, "Todd Allen" :
> Well, let's not forget the big picture.
>
> For all the bickering and squabbling it might have entailed, for all the
> stumbles that
n do to
become unmoderated again.
Trillium Corsage
24.05.2015, 14:07, "Ad Huikeshoven" :
> Hi all and Fae,
>
> One, I'm not a moderator on this list. Two, I do support civility and
> friendly space policies, Three, let's assume good faith, Four, Fae asks to
&
er tool can be used. As I understand it from all I've read, the
checkuser tool now has a "reason" field, but it can be left blank. Reconfigure
the tool to force entry of a reason for its use. And this also would immensely
improve the ability to audit the logs.
13.04.2015, 01:56, "T
his and brought it to the attention of the board, which then
strongly impliedly endorsed Beaudette's actions by changing the policy. I dunno
if he could similarly move the board on policy he's not intimately involved
with implementing, I'd say not.
Okay, then.
Trillium Corsage
tion were they required to provide? Proper documents, or merely an email
address and assertion that they are over 18?
Trillium Corsage
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikime
moira-type stalking incidents more
frequent in the future.
Trillium Corsage
14.03.2015, 06:35, "Pine W" :
> Hi Bishakha,
>
> Pardon my forking the thread here.
>
> I have previously asked about having more transparency and openness for WMF
> Board meetings. From m
lear the
matter up, why don't you clear the matter up before you moderate the guy?
Trillium Corsage
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
dn't do it.
Trillium Corsage
PS: yes, I identify as male ("he, his" etc.).
02.02.2015, 15:03, "Nathan" :
> I wasted the few minutes necessary to read "Trillium"'s blog post, and I
> don't recommend anyone else make that same mistake. He's
One is a steward the other is an administrator, I may have reversed their
roles, but they are definitely the two that stalked Moiramoira.
Thanks for the notification, I'll doublecheck which is which and see about
correcting that.
Trillium Corsage
02.02.2015, 14:55, "Hong, Yena&quo
e WMF's policy of according IP and other sensitive user data via
checkuser and UTRS and so forth to anonymous administrators is creating real
risks to Wikipedia editors, and that is the case I make in the open letter.
Trillium Corsage
we advised the individual privately,"
and that would be reasonable as far as I'm concerned.
Trillium Corsage
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedi
;t want. If it were done that way, there'd be no "you compromised
my privacy" complaint basis for the individual.
Trillium Corsage
20.01.2015, 12:11, "Chris McKenna" :
> As has been explained multiple times in multiple places, the WMF have been
> advised, for ver
Lfaraone, you're an English Wikipedia arbitrator only as far as I know. What
gives you the authority or expertise to make assertions about the legal
implications of WMF terms of use violations?
Are you a WMF employee?
Are you a lawyer?
Trillium Corsage
20.01.2015, 04:19, &quo
nspecified "violations of the terms of use" thought by those
that closely followed the cases to be suspicious interactions with child
editors.
WMF is still looking to untrained and mainly anonymous arbitrators to handle
its child protection responsibilities, so those bans were something of a
nd professional experience" is
completely different from his statement "a WMF employee make community
decisions for us (such as appointing the Jury that has our full authority for
deciding where Wikimania will be held."
All below.
Trillium Corsage
> Fae, I'm sorry, but
yourself very smart with this kind of wording. Let me
> tell you from a North German to a North German: "Dat bisse nich."
Man musst nicht Norddeutscher sein verstehen zu koennen dass das
Quatschvergleichung ist.
Trillium Corsage
___
Wikimedia
hem in size the
vocal and visible administrative set. So Mr. Moeller shouldn't feel
intimidated, and clearly doesn't, when a bunch of very loud people writes
volumes of complaining text on discussion pages insisting that he has affronted
"the community."
Trillium
ust try it. We will
Streisand you."
Trillium Corsage
06.08.2014, 16:11, "Nathan" :
> Thanks very much for this, Stephen and the legal team. I especially
> appreciate that the WMF has decided to make public the specific
> notifications of the use of the "Ri
m of unsubscribing to the list, but I'll keep
reading long enough to see if your below email asking for transparency on the
list goes anywhere. Good luck.
Trillium Corsage
11.07.2014, 11:28, "Fæ" :
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose that this list have a published proce
forth previously on this mailing list by the WMF's deputy general
counsel Luis Villa. I've attempted to answer those by explaining that you can
have a pretty good and effective policy without having an infallible one.
Trillium Corsage
29.06.2014, 07:32, "Pine W" :
> Trillium,
ng over
their IPs, and of course Googling and otherwise sleuthing for more on them,
that at least the WMF knows who they are, and the rank and file editor
potentially has some recourse if it finally comes to it. So I say the
usefulness there is treating editors right and furnishing a safer envir
nteers" what are you
saying? Are you saying the WMF cannot securely keep some copies of
identifications? The real volunteers at risk are those rank and file editors
you propose to expose to a group of anonymous and unaccountable administrative
participants.
Trillium Corsage
27
ation for
those faceless entities you prepare to turn loose with potentially cyberstalker
tools.
Whatever your stance, I do call on you to speak on the question. Say "yea," say
"nay," or say "not my concern," but at least speak.
Trillium Corsage
_
,
(http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=503298359.)
The answer is simple on that part at least. The WMF must start identifying, if
not publicly at least to it, those it accords access to the
person
Dear Mr. Brigham,
Excuse me, I should have copied you in the email I sent to the Wikimedia-l list
I sent a few minutes ago, because I mentioned you in it. Here:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2014-June/072499.html.
Trillium Corsage
or_community_members_applying_for_access_to_nonpublic_information_rights.)
How can the executive director be expected to assume responsibility for this
stuff in 14 hours, on her third official day on the job? Out of simple courtesy
to her, it needs to be delayed, while she is briefed on it by tho
t our lives. I respect the decision though of those that
sign their real name to everything, and endeavor to consider that in any
interaction I have with you.
Signature: well let me see how my nickname shows up on the list. I selected
"Trillium Corsage" as the name at the email service, bu
48 matches
Mail list logo
