Re: [ZION] Rumour about the scriptures

2002-09-29 Thread Steven Montgomery

At 10:03 AM 9/29/2002, Marc wrote:

I have both the pre-1980 and post-1980 versions of the Bible. The newer one is
large print, which I can use for teaching. But I keep the older one because it
was a particularly nicely bound type that they don't seem to make anymore 
(real
calfskin) and it was a gift from my mother as I was headed off down the road
south to Salt Lake and Provo. It's got a lot of scripture marking in it, and I
tend to remember things visually, so I'll often prefer the older one for that
reason. Just call me a sentimental old fogey.

--
Marc A. Schindler

Same here. Also, even though the post-1980 version had excellent 
footnoting there were still some footnotes in the pre-1980 version which, 
imo and in some respects, was better than the post-1980 version. Does 
anyone know of a LDS study bible in existence--or even an excellent non-LDS 
study bible?



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] LDS study bible

2002-10-02 Thread Steven Montgomery

I used to have (till my kids destroyed it--sadly) a fairly large comparison 
Bible which contained about 7 different versions (none of the modern 
watered down versions) of the Bible, and if I recall correctly a couple of 
translations from the original Hebrew and Greek. Joseph Smith once stated 
that he preferred the Hebrew language Bible (at least for the Old Testament 
as I understand that most of the New Testament was translated from Greek). 
Now I have studied a smattering of Hebrew and know that a lot can get left 
out of the translation--just as happens with just about every translation 
from one language to another. What I would like to see is an LDS version as 
close as possible to the original meaning as possible. For instance, I 
believe a lot of subtle nuances, idiomatic expressions, plays on words, 
etc., are left out of translations unless efforts are made to at least 
footnote and document these instances.

--
Steven Montgomery

At 01:36 PM 10/2/2002, you wrote:
I use the Anchor Bible, which is of course much more of an investment (the 
series
isn't finished yet and it already fills 2 1/2 shelves of one of my Ikea
bookshelves). But that's a somewhat different model. I don't really have a
one-volume commentary like the Scofield Bible, but iirc I've seen this in 
Logos,
a Christian bookstore I used to frequent in Calgary, and in the Canadian Bible
Society bookstore near U of Alberta here in Edmonton, and that's a good 
model for
what we're trying to do, only from an LDS point of view.

I'll give you a kind of anecdotal example of why some people think we need
something like this. I have one volume of an AB-sized library of commentaries,
but just the volume on I Corinthians, to help me out in my own contribution to
the LDS Study Bible. The series is called The New International Greek 
Testament
Commentary (NIGTC) and the volume on I Corinthians was written by Anthony C.
Thiselton, a fairly respectable conservative Protestant scholar. The book 
is 1450
pp long.

While he admits that 15:29 (the verse on vicarious baptism) is a notoriously
difficult crux: the most 'hotly disputed' in the epistle,... he summarizes a
grand total of roughly 20 possible interpretations. All *possible*
interpretations, that is, except the right one, and the most direct one. 
This guy
gets the Biblicist Pretzel Award nomination from me this year, I gotta 
tell you.

We need stuff that, while it may not be on that level wrt scholarship (for one
thing the market would be limited), at least gives LDS a basic level of
understanding that the Gospel isn't only true and that the only way to 
know that
is through spiritual means, oh by the way, it just happens to make sense, too,
and you don't have to be ashamed or cowed by intellectuals.

Gary Smith wrote:

  I don't think they are actually changing the words. What they are doing,
  is putting a lot of textual information on the original Aramaic and
  Greek, and discussing certain ideas within the NT from an LDS apologetics
  point of view. This one won't be to replace your LDS scriptures. This one
  will be for home use, where you can get a better understanding of what
  each verse _really_ means. So, you get the KJV, and the scholarly
  commentary.
 
  If you've hung out in any Christian bookstores, you'll find similar
  books. My favorite amongst them has been the Scofield Bible, though it is
  quite an older commentary. Marc, which versions do you prefer?
 
  K'aya K'ama,
  Gerald/gary  Smithgszion1 @juno.comhttp://www
  .geocities.com/rameumptom/index.html
  No one is as hopelessly enslaved as the person who thinks he's free.  -
  Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
 

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and
falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark.
--Michelangelo Buonarroti

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author's 
employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/


/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




RE: [ZION] Civil Disobedience

2002-10-06 Thread Steven Montgomery

At 08:33 AM 10/5/2002, you wrote:
It works for me.  Maybe you should try again later.  The article talks
about people who have used civil disobedience to accomplish political
goals.  I am curious what people think - do we believe in the obeying
the law no matter what? I presume most would have a place to draw the
line but where is the line?

Rose

The line is drawn by the Lord. Whatever the Lord requires is right. If one 
is guided by the Spirit of Revelation you will know in all cases what you 
are to do. However, I recognize that for most of the world, proper 
discernment between the Spirit of God and the Spirit of Satan (or one's own 
strong willed opinion) are lacking--the Lafferty Brothers (Dan  Ron) of 
the early 80's come to mind.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Explore Freedom: http://www.geocities.com/graymada

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] New documentary on a war criminal?

2002-10-06 Thread Steven Montgomery

At 04:18 PM 10/4/2002, you wrote:
The BBC has just released a new documentary on Henry Kissinger. It's a
biography, do doesn't just concentrate on the question I infer in my
subject line, but it does apparently interview some people in the U.S.
(some of who might surprise you) who think that he's a war criminal (a
somewhat different question than whether he should be / could be tried
as such).

(following is a review, in The New Yorker, of the documentary, as well
as another film critical of the British, as it happens, for an event in
their history.)
http://www.newyorker.com/critics/cinema/?021007crci_cinema

Proposed resolution to be put toward the house: yes, or no: this house
supports the conclusion that Henry Kissinger be considered a Gadianton
Robber.

--
Marc A. Schindler

I certainly don't know whether Henry Kissinger is a member of a secret 
combination or not. However, his actions could certainly draw one to that 
conclusion.

I'm reminded of my favorite joke of that time period. It seems that Six 
people were flying in a small airplane. One was the pilot, and the five 
passengers were, in order; Richard Nixon, Hubert H. Humphrey, Henry 
Kissinger, a priest, and a hippie. During mid-flight, the pilot comes into 
the passenger compartment, and says We seem to have developed some engine 
trouble. Since I'm the pilot, I'm going to bale out. There are only five 
parachutes. Then the pilot gave a wave and jumped out with a parachute. 
Nixon said, Well, I'm the President, so, well, umm, bye! Then HHH said, 
There are some things that Dick hasn't learned yet. Then, he jumped out. 
Now only Henry Kissinger, the priest and the hippie were left in the plane. 
Henry Kissinger looked at the others and announced, I am surely the 
smartest man in the world so I'm out of here! The priest says to the 
hippie, Well, son, I've lived a long and full life---you take the 
parachute! The hippie says, Hey man, we're cool. The smartest man in the 
world just jumped out with my backpack!



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Explore Freedom: http://www.geocities.com/graymada

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] Dove breeding

2002-10-10 Thread Steven Montgomery

At 01:23 PM 10/10/2002, you wrote:
John and others,
Question: How does Elder Nelson's talk on being peacemakers fit in with
things Pres Benson has stated in the past on defending freedom around the
world, etc. As I recall, he strongly defended the Vietnam War as a way to
help contain communism. Isn't our war with Iraq more justified than that
one?

K'aya K'ama,
Gerald/gary  Smith

As I recall it, President Benson was highly critical of the war in Vietnam. 
He didn't believe we should be fighting undeclared wars and didn't think we 
should be fighting in Vietnam while at the same time sending aid  trade to 
the Soviets.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Explore Freedom: http://www.geocities.com/graymada

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] Atomic Holocausts Predicted

2002-10-13 Thread Steven Montgomery

At 09:04 AM 10/13/2002, you wrote:
We do not say that all of the Saints will be spared and saved from the 
coming day of desolation. But we do say there is no promise of safety and 
no promise of security except for those who love the Lord and who are 
seeking to do all that he commands.

  (Bruce R. McConkie, Stand Independent above All Other Creatures, 
 Ensign, May 1979, 93)It may be, for instance, that nothing except the 
 power of faith and the authority of the priesthood can save individuals 
 and congregations from the atomic holocausts that surely shall be.
---

What do you think?  Is this prophecy going to be fulfilled?  Is not it a 
good reason to avoid sending our troops all over the planet engaging in 
war to bring peace?  I wish our troops would stay home in case we need 
them here.  I guess that makes me an isolationist.  But I don't believe 
the USA could or should be a global police force.  It is too likely to 
stir up hatreds and bring to pass the scenario predicted by Elder McConkie.

What do you think?  Is invading Iraq going to increase or decrease the 
likelihood of a nuclear war?  Is there anyone here who truly believes that 
invading Iraq is going to bring about a stable democracy?  Why should 
America's finest young men and women lay down their lives for nothing?

John W. Redelfs[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Interesting. I was just looking something up the other day and run across 
the following reference regarding pillars of smoke:

But the next passage puzzles me: I will shew wonders in the heavens and in 
the earth, blood, and fire, and pillars of smoke (Joel 2:30). We have had 
bloodshed, of course, ever since Cain murdered Abel. History is a chronicle 
of arson, pillage, burning, and corruption. Yet Moroni assured Joseph Smith 
that wonders in the heavens and in the earth, blood, and fire, and pillars 
of smoke would identify his dispensation. I looked up the Hebrew word 
which was translated into English as pillars of smoke. It is timeroth, or 
palm tree-like columns (spreading at the top). Now, that makes no sense. 
Or does it? Perhaps if the reporter at the White Sands proving grounds at 
Alamogordo, New Mexico, in 1943, had been from an area where palm trees 
were more prevalent than mushrooms, he may have described the appearance of 
the huge atomic cloud as being like a palm tree. This is only my 
interpretation; but about 400 B.C. a contemporary of Joel's, Zechariah, 
also looked into the last days in vision and described a terrible plague. 
Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their 
eyes shall consume away in their holes, and their tongue shall consume away 
in their mouth (Zechariah 14:12). Radiation? Perhaps. If not, what might 
he be referring to? I wonder how Joseph Smith interpreted that passage, or 
whether the vision Moroni showed him left no doubt.
  (Paul R. Cheesman and C. Wilfred Griggs, eds., Scriptures for the Modern 
World [Provo: BYU Religious Studies Center, 1984], 24 - 25.)

Now I have no idea whether that is what is meant by the Prophet Joel but it 
is interesting nevertheless.




--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] Elder Nelson misquoted

2002-10-13 Thread Steven Montgomery

At 05:45 PM 10/13/2002, you wrote:
  I cannot agree with this. I see no reason to suspect Bush as a mass
  murderer. And if this is so; why must I suppose that hundreds of
  thousands of conservative Latter-day Saints voted for him after careful
  prayer and consideration as directed by the First Presidency. I'm sorry
  John, but it doesn't add up in my book. If so, the Holy Ghost must be
  giving bad advice to the people of our church. All is lost...
 

 This is spiritual extortion. To assume that *your* political decision
has the
 backing of the HG implies that Democrats like President Faust,
President Larsen
 et al, don't have the backing of the HG. I'm sure that's not what you
meant to
 write.



I didn't say anything about the Democrats or anything about those who
voted for them. I simply implied that I smell something rotten in Denmark
if hundreds of thousands of LDS people pray for the Spirit's help in
electing a mass murderer for President. I don't buy it. I am convinced
that President Bush is a descent man. And with that, I wonder how many
times the Holy Ghost has born solid witness to faithful LDS voters that
George Bush is a descent man...

Paul O
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

I believe that GWB is a descent man--descended, like we all are, from Adam 
grin.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] Hindsight

2002-10-14 Thread Steven Montgomery

So, when the LORD declared unto Joshua that he had delivered the Amorites 
into his hand or when the LORD himself cast down great stones from heaven 
to slay the Amorites this was somehow fulfilling a lesser law? I fail to 
understand how the Israelites were somehow keeping a lesser law when God 
himself commanded them to slay the wicked and who occasionally (when the 
Israelites were righteous) fought their battles.

--
Steven Montgomery

At 01:07 PM 10/14/2002, you wrote:
And Christ came to fulfill the OT law and offer a higher law. (IOW, use 
the term
Bible less categorically and I think you'll see a stark contrast between 
OT and
NT ideas).

Jon Spencer wrote:

  John W. Redelfs wrote:
   Actually, the only time the Nephites went on a search and destroy 
 mission,
   following the Gadiantons up into the mountains, they were soundly 
 defeated
   and had to withdraw.  The Book of Mormon is the story of national 
 DEFENSE,
   not offense.  --JWR
 
  Your offense is my defense.
 
  And in the Bible, also God's word, there were many offensive defenses put
  up.
 
  Jon
 

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and
falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark.
--Michelangelo Buonarroti

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author's 
employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/


--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

HTML
BODY
a href=http://www.getusout.org;img border=0 
src=http://www.getusout.org/images/guolink.gif;/a
PPBR
/BODY
/HTML

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] Hindsight

2002-10-14 Thread Steven Montgomery

While I agree with you regarding righteous wars, I don't necessarily agree 
with your statement that Zion doesn't expand through warfare 
anymore.  For instance, why has the Lord repeatedly stated that, after we 
have done our part, He would fight our battles.

--
Steven Montgomery

At 07:41 PM 10/14/2002, you wrote:
The law is the same: a war is righteous if the Lord commands it (this is 
in the
BoM, the DC and in numerous 1P statements). But since the meridian of 
time there
have been few, if any, such commandments. Zion doesn't expand through warfare
anymore. That's what's meant by fulfilling the law. You don't overthrow 
it. This
objection (below) is similar to the reaction the Pharisees had to Jesus's 
claims
(nothing personal against Steven).

Steven Montgomery wrote:

  So, when the LORD declared unto Joshua that he had delivered the Amorites
  into his hand or when the LORD himself cast down great stones from heaven
  to slay the Amorites this was somehow fulfilling a lesser law? I fail to
  understand how the Israelites were somehow keeping a lesser law when God
  himself commanded them to slay the wicked and who occasionally (when the
  Israelites were righteous) fought their battles.
 
  --
  Steven Montgomery
 
  At 01:07 PM 10/14/2002, you wrote:
  And Christ came to fulfill the OT law and offer a higher law. (IOW, use
  the term
  Bible less categorically and I think you'll see a stark contrast between
  OT and
  NT ideas).
  
  Jon Spencer wrote:
  
John W. Redelfs wrote:
 Actually, the only time the Nephites went on a search and destroy
   mission,
 following the Gadiantons up into the mountains, they were soundly
   defeated
 and had to withdraw.  The Book of Mormon is the story of national
   DEFENSE,
 not offense.  --JWR
   
Your offense is my defense.
   
And in the Bible, also God's word, there were many offensive 
 defenses put
up.
   
Jon
   
  
  --
  Marc A. Schindler
  Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland
  
  The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too 
 high and
  falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark.
  --Michelangelo Buonarroti
  
  Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the 
 author
  solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author's
  employer,
  nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.
  
  /// 
 //
  ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
  ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
  /// 
 //
  
 
  --
  Steven Montgomery
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  HTML
  BODY
  a href=http://www.getusout.org;img border=0
  src=http://www.getusout.org/images/guolink.gif;/a
  PPBR
  /BODY
  /HTML
 
  
 /
  ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
  ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
  
 /
 

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and
falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark.
--Michelangelo Buonarroti

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author's 
employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/


--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

HTML
BODY
a href=http://www.getusout.org;img border=0 
src=http://www.getusout.org/images/guolink.gif;/a
PPBR
/BODY
/HTML

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] The Rulers of Darkness

2002-10-15 Thread Steven Montgomery

At 07:46 AM 10/15/2002, Paul wrote:


Well, you know me--I'm NOT into conspiracy theories at all. Wasn't it so
that Elder Benson was all alone in his campaign or which of the other
apostles stood by his side and declared the same message? You know what I
mean--two or three witnesses. Was his campaign overseen by the First
Presidency including the one he belonged to? I don't believe it was.

Below are six statements from President Ezra Taft Benson regarding a world- 
wide conspiracy that is increasing its evil influence and control over 
America and the entire world. These warnings have come to us from God 
through His living prophet. All six statements came after his call in 1985 
to be President of the Church. They cannot be safely ignored. Without an 
understanding of these prophetic warnings, we cannot correctly interpret 
national and world events. President Benson's apostolic statements during 
the 42 years prior to his becoming President of the Church are also helpful 
as we seek to understand his prophetic statements on this important 
subject. Many of these apostolic statements were keynote addresses made 
with the full support, advice, and even explicit recommendation by 
President David O. McKay. Need two witnesses? Add David O. McKay as a 
second witness. During this time Elder Benson gave 15 General Conference 
addresses
and President McKay, over a dozen on freedom, free enterprise, fiscal 
responsibility, the Constitution, and agency. They invariably tied these 
topics into showing the evils of secret combinations. (Sheri Dew, Ezra Taft 
Benson: A Biography, Deseret Book, 1987, pp. 366,367.) Finally, God does 
not call as Prophets men who teach false doctrine.

1. Secret Combinations

• Oct. 1986: From the Book of Mormon we see the evils of secret 
combinations portrayed in graphic and chilling reality . . . . We should 
constantly ask ourselves, 'Why did the Lord inspire Mormon (or Moroni or 
Alma) to include that in his record? What lesson can I learn from that to 
help me live in this day and age?' (Conference Report, Oct. 1986, Ensign, 
Nov. 1986, pp. 6-7; also The Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson, p. 59.)

• April 1989: Secret combinations . . . are built up to get power, gain, 
and glory of the world. (See Hel. 7:5; Ether 8:9, 16, 22-23; Moses 5:31.) . 
. . Secret combinations brought down both the Jaredite and the Nephite 
civilizations and [have] been and will yet be the cause of the fall of many 
nations. (See Ether 8:18-25.) (Conference Report, Oct. 1989, Ensign, May 
1989, p. 6.)

• Jan. 1988: The situation in the world will continue to degenerate unless 
we read and heed the words of God and quit building up and upholding secret 
combinations, which the Book of Mormon tells us proved the downfall of 
ancient civilizations. (The Book of Mormon Is the Word of God, Ensign, 
Jan. 1988, p. 5.)

• April 1986: Our nation will continue to degenerate unless we read and 
heed the words of the God of this land, Jesus Christ, and quit building up 
and upholding the secret combinations which the Book of Mormon tells us 
proved the downfall of both previous American civilizations. (The Book of 
Mormon Is the Word of God, Regional Representative Seminar, Friday, April 
4, 1986, pp. 3-4; as quoted in The Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson, p. 61.)

• Oct. 1988: Wickedness is rapidly expanding in every segment of our 
society. (See DC 1:14- 16; 84:49-53.) It is more highly organized, more 
cleverly disguised, and more powerfully promoted than ever before. Secret 
combinations lusting for power, gain, and glory are flourishing. A secret 
combination that seeks to overthrow the freedom of all lands, nations, and 
countries is increasing its evil influence and control over America and the 
entire world. (See Ether 8:18-25.) (Conference Report, Oct. 1988, Ensign, 
Nov. 1988, p. 87; italics added.)

• April 1987: Secret combinations flourished because, as Helaman tells us, 
the Gadianton robbers 'had seduced the more part of the righteous until 
they had come down to believe in their works and partake of their spoils' 
(Helaman 6:38). (Conference Report, April 1987, Ensign, May 1987, p. 4; 
italics added.)



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===




Re: [ZION] The Rulers of Darkness

2002-10-15 Thread Steven Montgomery

At 06:32 PM 10/15/2002, you wrote:
 • Jan. 1988: The situation in the world will continue to degenerate
unless
 we read and heed the words of God and quit building up and upholding
secret
 combinations, which the Book of Mormon tells us proved the downfall of
 ancient civilizations. (The Book of Mormon Is the Word of God,
Ensign,
 Jan. 1988, p. 5.)


Does this make President Bush a Gadianton? NOPE!

It simply says that we are to read the scriptures and to not give in to
the tempations of Babylon or it will destroy us.

Paul O
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

By their fruits ye shall know them. The Bush administration is loaded with 
CFR members and is every inch an establishment man. 
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/2000/07-17-2000/vo16no15_bush.htm


--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

HTML
BODY
a href=http://www.getusout.org;img border=0 
src=http://www.getusout.org/images/guolink.gif;/a
PPBR
/BODY
/HTML

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===




Re: [ZION] The Rulers of Darkness

2002-10-15 Thread Steven Montgomery

At 06:36 PM 10/15/2002, you wrote:
 Oct. 1988: Wickedness is rapidly expanding in every segment of our
 society. (See DC 1:14- 16; 84:49-53.) It is more highly organized, more

 cleverly disguised, and more powerfully promoted than ever before.
Secret
 combinations lusting for power, gain, and glory are flourishing. A
secret
 combination that seeks to overthrow the freedom of all lands, nations,
and
 countries is increasing its evil influence and control over America and
the
 entire world. (See Ether 8:18-25.) (Conference Report, Oct. 1988,
Ensign,
 Nov. 1988, p. 87; italics added.)


No where here are individuals of our government targeted. It simply says
that wickedness is expanding in all parts of society and that does not
necessarily mean the government only. The prophet was not specific. I'm
glad. because I don't want to know.

Paul O
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Prime targets of the Secret Combinations are the organs of power. Gain 
control of the government and you gain control of the rest of society.

Helaman 6: 39  And thus they did obtain the sole management of the 
government, insomuch that they did trample under their feet and smite and 
rend and turn their backs upon the poor and the meek, and the humble 
followers of God.




--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

HTML
BODY
a href=http://www.getusout.org;img border=0 
src=http://www.getusout.org/images/guolink.gif;/a
PPBR
/BODY
/HTML

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] The Rulers of Darkness

2002-10-15 Thread Steven Montgomery

At 06:53 PM 10/15/2002, you wrote:

 destruction of the people, but notice how he singled out the secret
 combinations, just as the Church today could point out many threats to
 peace, prosperity, and the spread of God's work, but it has singled out
 as
 the greatest threat the Godless conspiracy. There is no conspiracy
theory
 in the Book of Mormon—it is a conspiracy fact.



I seek to live by the principles of the Book of Mormon. A man can get
closer to God by abiding the precepts therein than any other book. I'll
leave the conspiracies to the prophets since they seem to know so much
about them. If the Lord wills it-- let the prophets go out and fight our
battles by approaching the beasts, false prophets, and Gadiantons. The
power is in their hands.

Notice how he said that they threaten the spread of God's work? Sound
like Iraq to me. All in all you have failed to make your case. The church
does not have a program in place for LDS people to get involved in
conspiracy facts or theories. We are too busy raising our families and
trying to be good. We are too busy trying to be politically correct so
everyone will like the Mormons. Let the prophet go up against the beast!
Count me out!

Paul O
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

President Ezra Taft Benson has reminded:

The Prophet Joseph Smith is reported to have prophesied the role the 
priesthood might play to save our inspired Constitution. Now is the time to 
move forward courageously—to become alerted, informed, and active.

The Lord's priesthood has a mission to perform for liberty-loving people 
everywhere. We cannot, any more than Jonah of old, run away from our 
calling. (The Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson, p. 620; italics added.)

On another occasion, President Benson said:

Any Christian constitutionalist who retreats from this battle jeopardizes 
his life here and hereafter. Seldom has so much responsibility hung on so 
few, so heavily; but our numbers are increasing, and we who have been 
warned have a responsibility to warn our neighbor (see DC 88:81). (Ibid., 
p. 591.)

[The] divine duty to be a faithful fighter for freedom requires that those 
of us who have been warned do our duty to warn our neighbor. (Ibid., p. 657.)

• Righteousness is important. In fact, President Benson has said repeatedly 
that righteousness is the one indispensable ingredient to liberty. (Ibid, 
p. 346; see also pp. 416  588.)

How, asks the Prophet, can we best befriend the Constitution in this 
critical hour and secure the blessings of liberty? (Ibid., p. 621.) The 
Prophet answers his own question: First and foremost, we must be 
righteous. (Ibid.; italics in original.)

It has been suggested, however, that the fundamental principles of the 
Constitution will be upheld and the nation will be saved as members of the 
Church simply live the gospel. President Benson has responded to this 
suggestion as follows:

Satan is anxious to neutralize the inspired counsel of the prophet and 
hence keep the priesthood off balance, ineffective, and inert in the fight 
for freedom. He does this through diverse means, including the use of 
perverse reasoning.

For example, he will argue, 'There is no need to get involved in the fight 
for freedom;all you need to do is live the gospel.' Of course this is a 
contradiction, because we cannot fully live the gospel and not be involved 
in the fight for freedom.

We would not say to someone, -There is no need to be baptized-;all you need 
to do is live the gospel.' That would be ridiculous because baptism is a 
part of the gospel. How would you have reacted if during the War in Heaven 
someone had said to you, -Look, just do what is right; there is no need to 
get involved in the fight for free agency.' It is obvious what the devil is 
trying to do, but it is sad to see many of us fall for his destructive line.

The cause of freedom is a most basic part of our religion. Our position on 
freedom helped get us to this earth and it can make the difference as to 
whether we get back home or not. (Ibid., p. 656.)

• And finally, President Benson has warned:

One of our most serious problems is the inferiority complex which people 
feel when they are not informed and organized. They dare not make a 
decision on these vital issues. They let other people think for them. They 
stumble around in the middle of the road trying to avoid being 
'controversial,' and get hit by traffic going both ways. In this mighty 
struggle each of you has a part. Every person on the earth today chose the 
right side during the War in Heaven. Be on the right side now. Stand up and 
be counted. (Ibid., p. 387.)


--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

HTML
BODY
a href=http://www.getusout.org;img border=0 
src=http://www.getusout.org/images/guolink.gif;/a
PPBR
/BODY
/HTML

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html

Re: [ZION] The Rulers of Darkness

2002-10-16 Thread Steven Montgomery

The placement of U.S. Missiles in Turkey.  At least that's the pat answer 
the leftists always give. This answer however, is similar to the one given 
for taking over the countries of eastern Europe--that they needed buffer 
states to prevent against western aggression and hides the fact that the 
USSR was an imperialistic country.  The real reason the Soviets put 
missiles in Cuba is that is was part of their expansionist policies.

--
Steven Montgomery

At 09:13 AM 10/16/2002, you wrote:
I know what you mean, but technically Khrushchev had nothing to do with the
embargo of Cuba, which was put into place by the U.S. I think you mean the
emplacement of missiles there. But what very few USAmericans realize, and what
you apparently aren't taught is that this was in reprisal for something. 
Trivia
time, boys and girls: anybody know what the original US action was that 
prompted
the emplacement of missiles in Cuba?

Paul Osborne wrote:

  I think you have a Pollyanna view of Prophets and their role. In 1959,
  at
  President McKay's request, [then] Elder Ezra Taft Benson welcomed and
  shook
  hands with the butcher of the Ukraine, Nikita Kruschev. More recently,
  at
  the Polynesian Cultural Center in Hawaii, Church leaders met with some
  of
  the leaders of the murderous Communist Chinese regime. So what? The
  First
  Presidency meets with a lot of people in an official capacity, not all
  of
  them righteous upstanding individuals, and a few of them with hearts
  full
  of murder.
 
  Well, I don't know much about Kruschev other than he backed down against
  the blockade in Cuba. Whether he is a murderer or not is not for me to
  decide. Same thing goes for the Chinese leaders. And if the prophet does
  shake hands with murderers--all I can say is I am terribly disappointed
  and I disapprove. Oh well. I suppose that these guys you call murderers
  have already been baptized by proxy?
 
  What a deal. :-(
 
  Paul O
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  
 
  GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
 
  Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
 
  Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
 
  http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
 
  
 /
  ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
  ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html ///
  
 /
 

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and
falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark.
--Michelangelo Buonarroti

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author's 
employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html ///
/


--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

HTML
BODY
a href=http://www.getusout.org;img border=0 
src=http://www.getusout.org/images/guolink.gif;/a
PPBR
/BODY
/HTML

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




RE: [ZION] The Rulers of Darkness

2002-10-16 Thread Steven Montgomery

At 09:02 PM 10/16/2002, you wrote:
After careful consideration, Stephen Beecroft wrote:
Actually, I don't love my own sarcasm. What comes out of my fingertips
sounding silly and a bit over-the-top to me ends up seeming much more
acidic and unpleasant than intended. You'd think I would learn to avoid
sarcasm, since I can't seem to dilute it down enough.

Well, I happen to like sarcasm as long as it doesn't get too personal and 
hurt too much.  My maternal grandfather was heavily into sarcasm and I 
appreciate the humor as long as it is directed elsewhere. grin  Jim 
Cobabe is really good at it too.


John W. Redelfs[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Let me pipe in and add that I love the facility that both Jim and Stephen 
have with the english language. Would that I could craft sentences so well.




--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] Voting and Parties

2002-10-23 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 07:36 PM 10/23/2002, you wrote:

IMO, I agree with President George Washington in his Farewell Address,
that we should shun political parties. All they have done is divide the
nation along a single line without as much as a care for actual platform.
Too many people vote for a party, simply because their parents did. Very
few vote for the character of the individual or that person's individual
platform.

Just because a party has a platform does not mean the individual holds to
it. Whatever happened to George Bush's promise to help the schools?
Instead, he turned the process over to Ted Kennedy and the Democrats'
pro-teacher's-union platform to decide what to do. We didn't get what was
promised, and most people have forgotten, because they are tied to the
party, rather than the policies.

Instead of passing laws to protect us from terrorism and to fund the war
on it, the two parties are fighting over platform issues: should the new
workers be unionized? Should we throw in money for after school programs,
so we can help the incumbents get reelected? Instead of hitting the real
issues, we have Daschle attacking inane items; and we have the
Republicans ignoring the economy in order to win the election through the
war on terrorism.

Finally, without parties, we would be able to have more people run for
office and have a chance of winning. We wouldn't need campaign reform,
because money would be tied to the individual and not to a political
party and its abuses. And we wouldn't have the crimes of an elected
leader protected by a political party, whether it is Nixon or Clinton, if
one is guilty of crimes, the entire Congress should honestly investigate
it and do their job; not sweep sins under the carpet in order to protect
the party.

One more thing. We need to put term limits on all Congress. One term for
Senate, two for House. Then we wouldn't have people fighting to keep
themselves forever in office, and it would reduce the amount of voter
bribes. New Senators and Congressmen have a vision to fix America. Old
ones are mostly interested in keeping their position.

K'aya K'ama,
Gerald/gary  Smith


I'd like to see the electoral college used the way the framers 
intended--each state would decide how their particular electoral college 
representatives would be elected, and then these representatives would vote 
for president. This way the chances are a better candidate would be elected 
rather than mediocre or poor candidates who might look better or have that 
certain popular charisma than more qualified but less popularly appealing 
candidates.

We don't need term limits. We already have term limits if the people so 
choose--their vote.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Nations are defined by their founders. George Washington set a standard of
selfless public service and heroic private virtue against which American
politicians continue to be measured - and found wanting - even today. 
--Steven W. Mosher 

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Definition of liberal

2002-10-23 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 08:25 PM 10/23/2002, you wrote:

Unfortunately, it is what Liberal now means in the US.

It used to be that liberal was one that sought to help the underdog with
smart assistance from government, while ensuring the freedoms of the
average joe. But the term liberal has been co-opted by fringe groups in
the US. Gore is a perfect example of what liberal now means in the US:
follows the extreme environmental tactics, reproductive rights, and the
rights of perverse groups.


Actually our founding fathers (U.S.) were perfect examples of the classical 
liberal. Etymology wise the word has roots in the more meaningful term, 
liberty.

Constitutionalism. I want to be known as a constitutionalist in the 
tradition of James Madison-father of the Constitution. Labels change and 
perhaps in the old tradition I would be considered one of the original 
Whigs. The new title I would wear today is that of conservative-though in 
its original British connotation the term liberal fits me better than the 
original meaning of the word conservative.
To show how labels can change or be stolen, a liberal today believes in 
greater government intervention and less personal freedom for the people, 
which is practically the opposite of what the old liberals believed years 
ago. (The Red Carpet, pp. 206-7.)
 (Ezra Taft Benson, The Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson [Salt Lake City: 
Bookcraft, 1988], 690.)


--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

HTML
BODY
a href=http://www.getusout.org;img border=0 
src=http://www.getusout.org/images/guolink.gif;/a
PPBR
/BODY
/HTML

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] War in Iraq

2002-10-21 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 05:39 PM 10/21/2002, JWR wrote:

At 12:03 PM, Monday, 10/21/02, Marc A. Schindler wrote:

I keep asking why Pakistan isn't being targetted instead of Iraq. We can
add another piece of turtle meat to the fire: there is at least the
accusation that Pakistan supplied North Korea with its light gas
centrifugal technology (which it got from the US) which is used to
produce enriched uranium. Pakistan has denied it. The US is also
accusing China of helping North Korea, but I can't see how a nuclear war
in the region would be to Beijing's advantage.


It is worse than that.  Pakistan got The Bomb from China who got The Bomb 
from us.

And according to Major Racey Jordan (_Major Jordan's Diaries_), who flew 
lend-lease supply missions from Alaska to the Soviet Union, the Soviet's 
were given all the materials, plans and specifications to build their own 
Atomic Bomb--a direct result of Harry Hopkin's involvement in the process.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Nations are defined by their founders. George Washington set a standard of
selfless public service and heroic private virtue against which American
politicians continue to be measured - and found wanting - even today. 
--Steven W. Mosher 

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Stop kicking the stuffing out of Turkey

2002-10-21 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 06:35 PM 10/21/2002, you wrote:

Steven, Cliff can speak for himself, but I for one will not be intimidated by
spiritual harrassment. My testimony is not up to you to define with 
idiosyncratic
and isolated proof-texts.  In any case, the claim wasn't whether Castro *said*
he'd been a Communist all his life, it's whether it was a fact or not. 
Naturally
by 1962 he would have said something like this because he'd signed the 
treaty of
friendship with the Soviet Union. This is the second time I've addressed this.
You can choose to believe me or not, but the courtesy of a response would be
appreciated, rather than just repeating the same old charge.

Just think: Cuba could have been a democracy except for your meddling.

Right. And Fidel Castro was the George Washington of Cuba. NOT!

I've already showed you where there was overwhelming evidence that when 
Fidel Castro took power in January 1959 that he had been a Communist agent 
at least since 1948, when he led a bloody Communist uprising in Bogota, 
Colombia. It is common practice among revolutionaries to pretend they are 
democratic in order to help them slide into power. Once in power Castro's 
true colors came out.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Nations are defined by their founders. George Washington set a standard of
selfless public service and heroic private virtue against which American
politicians continue to be measured - and found wanting - even today. 
--Steven W. Mosher 

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Stop kicking the stuffing out of Turkey

2002-10-21 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 06:57 PM 10/21/2002, Marc wrote:


But I'm not the one quoting general authorities in an attempt to back up my
political and historical opinions. You are. Logically speaking, you are, in
effect, challenging me to criticize Pres. Benson. I'm not going to fall 
into that
trap. (I take it that in your response you are the messenger and Pres. 
Benson
the sources?)


--
Marc A. Schindler

ETB knew about Castro's communist connections because both the U.S. 
Ambassadors to Cuba and Mexico warned him about the connections.  Okay, 
forget about the Benson quote. Forget I mentioned it. Perhaps it was a 
lapse of judgement on my part.

What about the other evidence that Castro was a communist?



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Nations are defined by their founders. George Washington set a standard of
selfless public service and heroic private virtue against which American
politicians continue to be measured - and found wanting - even today. 
--Steven W. Mosher 

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Stop kicking the stuffing out of Turkey

2002-10-21 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 07:36 PM 10/21/2002, you wrote:

At 06:57 PM 10/21/2002, Marc wrote:


But I'm not the one quoting general authorities in an attempt to back up my
political and historical opinions. You are. Logically speaking, you are, in
effect, challenging me to criticize Pres. Benson. I'm not going to fall 
into that
trap. (I take it that in your response you are the messenger and Pres. 
Benson
the sources?)


--
Marc A. Schindler

ETB knew about Castro's communist connections because both the U.S. 
Ambassadors to Cuba and Mexico warned him about the connections.  Okay, 
forget about the Benson quote. Forget I mentioned it. Perhaps it was a 
lapse of judgement on my part.

What about the other evidence that Castro was a communist?



--
Steven Montgomery

On second thought, why should I apologize for quoting ETB? After all, this 
is an LDS religious list, is it not? In your postings with the Subject 
line, Cult of Personality, you've made great noise about the fact that 
sometimes even General Authorities can disagree on political matters. Fine, 
I accept that, and believe it. Trouble is, where is the General Authority 
who disagrees with ETB regarding this particular issue, that of Fidel 
Castro being a communist? I haven't been able to find one. Perhaps there is 
a general consensus then?



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Nations are defined by their founders. George Washington set a standard of
selfless public service and heroic private virtue against which American
politicians continue to be measured - and found wanting - even today. 
--Steven W. Mosher 

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Stop kicking the stuffing out of Turkey

2002-10-22 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 12:03 AM 10/22/2002, Marc wrote:


What difference does that make to the point I've been trying to make that 
it was
US meddling that paved the way to his [Castro's] rise to power?

We have no argument here. I agree. Although probably for different reasons.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Nations are defined by their founders. George Washington set a standard of
selfless public service and heroic private virtue against which American
politicians continue to be measured - and found wanting - even today. 
--Steven W. Mosher 

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Cult of personality

2002-10-22 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 12:25 PM 10/22/2002, Marc wrote regarding the website www.rescue007.org:



AFAI am concerned, the site's purpose is to sell a book. But when I get to the
other side I'll look for any KAL 007 vets. Who knows.


I don't think the site sell's enough books to pay for itself. The reason 
Bert Schlossberg is interested in this subject is that he was the son in 
law of one of the passengers on the plane. Since he was closely connected 
to the Israeli Research Center for Prisons, Psychprisons, and Forced Labor 
Concentration Camps of the USSR, and its director Avraham Shifrin, 
Schlossberg was able to follow closely the revelations about KAL 007, its 
landing and the survival of those aboard. Interestingly enough former 
Soviet military personnel who started to immigrate to Israel kept up a 
steady flow of information  Reports of survivors and other information 
about KAL007 began to flow into Israel when former Soviet Military 
personnel began arriving as immigrants and becoming citizens of Israel. He 
holds a masters degree near eastern studies and currently teaches Aramaic, 
Syriac and Hebrew at Israel College of the Bible. (See his short bio: 
http://www.rescue007.org/bert_schlossberg.htm)

As I mentioned Schlossberg has no connection with the John Birch Society, 
but interestingly enough the JBS have maintained for years that there are 
many unanswered questions about what really happened to flight KAL007: 
http://www.thenewamerican.com/focus/mcdonald/kal/index.htm


--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Secret combinations . . . are built up to get power, gain, and glory of 
the world. (See Hel. 7:5; Ether 8:9, 16, 22-23; Moses 5:31.) . . . Secret 
combinations brought down both the Jaredite and the Nephite civilizations 
and [have] been and will yet be the cause of the fall of many nations. (See 
Ether 8:18-25.) (President Ezra Taft Benson, Conference Report, Oct. 1989, 
Ensign, May 1989, p. 6.)

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Stop kicking the stuffing out of Turkey

2002-10-22 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 11:58 PM 10/21/2002, Marc wrote:



Straw man, Steven. I have never tried to argue that Castro is not 
Communist, is not
a dictator. We are talking right past each other. I'm admitting all the 
bad things
you are saying about him, but saying that the US had a large -- indeed, 
the major
-- part to play in paving the way for him to come to power. You could have
prevented it by nurturing democracy but you chose instead to nurture 
tyranny. I
don't care what colour you paint the giant bronze statue in the town square --
Communist red is the same as Fascist brown  or Plutocratic green and gold 
in my
books.

Then what are we arguing about? Because I generally agree with your 
position here. Gadianton Robbers located in the U.S. *did* have a great 
part to play in Castro coming to power. Just as they played a part in the 
Bolshevik revolution and helping Mao come to power. Such was the general 
thesis in books such as, _None Dare Call It Conspiracy_, _The Naked 
Capitalist_, and others.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Nations are defined by their founders. George Washington set a standard of
selfless public service and heroic private virtue against which American
politicians continue to be measured - and found wanting - even today. 
--Steven W. Mosher 

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] UN Moral Authority

2002-10-24 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 09:22 PM 10/23/2002, Marc wrote:


the UN Security Council). Nation states are dying as institutions, and 
power is
flowing up to super-regions, and down to micro-regions, so the question 
will come
to make even less and less sense as the new century unfolds, imo.

--
Marc A. Schindler

I agree, and believe you are right. Although we would probably disagree on 
the causes.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Jerusalem temple

2002-10-26 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 04:58 PM 10/25/2002, Paul wrote:

I don't believe the Jews could build a temple unto the Lord. If the
Catholics can't do it, neither can the Jews. Don't you believe Elder
McConkie when he said the temple would be built by the Church?

Paul O
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Personally, I don't know how the temple will be built in Jerusalem. I lean 
towards McConkie's view but I think we need to separate doctrine from 
speculation. BRM may be right but his view is not official gospel doctrine.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



[ZION] Isaiah Study Resource

2002-10-27 Thread Steven Montgomery
Check out Ivan D. Sanderson's magnificent Isaiah study site: 
http://isaiah.1hwy.com/


--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

. . . it is as much their [The Elders of Israel] duty to study correct 
political principles as well as religion, and to seek and know and 
comprehend the social and political interests of man, and to learn and be 
able to teach that which would be best calculated to promote the interests 
of the world.--John Taylor

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Iraq: letters in Meridian

2002-10-31 Thread Steven Montgomery
Things have changed indeed. Got any good job openings up there in maple 
leaf land?

--
Steven Montgomery

At 02:40 PM 10/31/2002, you wrote:
You really don't want to get into this again. I'd rather face a guy with a 
bat than
a guy with a firearm. Common sense. Ironically, a Canadian is now in a New 
York
state jail because he brought his hunting rifle with him as he crossed the 
border
to fill up at a gas station 15 metres from the border. The actual border 
crossing
is about a kilometre further down the road, and locals had been using this gas
station for years, as the gas prices in Quebec are quite high.

But things have changed -- you're losing your freedoms. Our foreign 
affairs people
are advising Canadian citizens who were born in the Middle East not to 
travel via
the US. One, a man originally from Syria, was enroute from Damascus, where 
he'd
been visiting family (the first time he'd been there since he left, as a 
child),
and was deported from JFK back to Syria. Canadian consular officials 
weren't even
informed, in direct violation of the Vienna Convention.

It's a pretty sad state of affairs when we pinko socialists have more 
freedom than
you do.

John W. Redelfs wrote:

 At 08:46 PM, Wednesday, 10/30/02, Marc A. Schindler wrote:
 Marc A. Schindler
 Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland
 
 Guns don't kill people; people with guns kill people.

 And people with knives.  And people with rocks.  And people with 
baseball bats.

 A few years ago here in Ketchikan Ward, a member who had not attended
 church since he was a teenager, tried to rob a local man.  There was a
 struggle.  The robber picked up a rock and hit his intended victim on the
 head, and he died.  And just last year there were 3 or 4 murders.  One of
 the victims was just beat to death.  It doesn't take a gun to kill
 people.  All it takes is a murderer.  And if we take away their guns, they
 will just murder using something else.

 Did anyone read in the newspaper about six months ago about a playground
 rampage in Japan?  I think about 13 children we killed, and the murderer
 used a knife, not a gun.

 What we need is murderer control, not gun control.

 John W. Redelfs   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ===
 I don't think I'm alone when I say I'd like to see more
 and more planets fall under the ruthless domination of
 our solar system. --Jack Handy
 ===
 All my opinions are tentative pending further data. --JWR

 
/
 ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
 ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
 
/


/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/


/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] Imagine that!

2002-11-01 Thread Steven Montgomery
They must be stepping up their attack of these scam letters. I usually 
receive one or two of these a year, but, for some odd reason, just in the 
last few weeks I've received several.

--
Steven Montgomery

At 08:25 PM 10/31/2002, you wrote:
I know there's a lot of hilarity in this thread, but in all seriousness, you
should let your local authorities know -- I presume that means the FBI in your
case. The Nigerian scam has been going on since the early '80s when we used to
get faxed letters from Nigeria where I worked (no, wait a minute -- I 
worked in
*Ottawa*, not *Lagos*, although I've been to Lagos. Armpit of the world. I 
would
never go back there again, but I digress).

In Canada the RCMP has a unit dedicated to tracking these and trying to 
promote
awareness of it (you would be surprised at what a potent combination 
naivete and
greed can be). It's morphed into other versions, too. The cutest I've seen is
supposedly from the widow of Mobuto Sese Seko who needs help unfreezing her
husband's illicitly stashed gazillions in Swiss banks with serpentine
bureaucrazies and byzantine regulations. Fees for this, and fees for that, and
before you know it you're starting to pawn off the fleet of Bentleys...

Canadians are urged to forward anything like this they get to the RCMP -- see
http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/scams/nigerian.htm for further information.

Jim Cobabe wrote:

 An interesting note in my mailbox today...

 Since I'm already independently wealthy, I have no interest in this
 unique investment opportunity.  No need to be selfish, I said to myself.
  Perhaps someone else could benefit from the promised 5 million dollars.

 In all honesty, even if these crooks delivered on their promises, I
 figure the government and my exwife would claim all the money, leaving
 me with only the legal liability and bureacratic snarls.

 But I was wondering--where exactly is Lagos?  Sounds like a toy for
 children.

 ;-


 Included Text

  CONFIDENTIAL

 25 randle Street,
 victoria Island,
 Lagos.

 IFax:17756401249

  30/10/2002

 ATTN:THE PRESIDENT/CEO

 FROM:JOHN MAYAKI.

 Dear Sir,

 I would like to firstly send to you the best wishes of good
 health and success in your pursuits particularly through
 my proposal as contained in this letter.

 Before going into details of my proposal to you, I must
 first implore you to treat with the utmost confidentiality
 as this is required for its success and to have faith in
 this transaction,for opportunities
 like this only comes to one once in a life time.

 My colleagues and I are senior officials of the Federal
 Government of my country's Contracts Review Panel (CRP) who
 are interested in diverting some funds that are presently
 floating in the accounts of the Apex Bank of my country.In
 order to commence this transaction,
 we solicit for your assistance to enable us transfer into
 your nominated account the said floating funds. We are
 determined to conclude the transfer before the end of this
 quarter of 2002.
 The source of the funds are as follows: During the last
 military regime in my country,government officials set up
 companies and awarded themselves contracts that were
 grossly over-invoiced in various ministries and
 parastatals.The present civilian government set up the
 Contract Review Panel, which has the mandate to use the
 instruments of payments made available to it by the decree
 setting up the panel, to review these contracts and if
 necessary pay those who are being owed outstanding amounts.

 My colleagues and I have identified quite a huge sum of
 these funds which are presently floating in our (Apex)
 Central Bank ready for disbursement and would like to
 divert some of it for our own purposes. However, by virtue
 of our positions as civil servants
 and members of this panel, we cannot acquire these funds
 in our names or in the names of companies that are based
 in my country. I have therefore been mandated,as a matter
 of trust by my colleagues in
 the panel, to look for a reliable overseas partner into
 whose account we can transfer the sum of
 U.S.$20,500,000.00 (Twenty
 million, five hundred thousand U.S. dollars).That is why I
 am seeking your assistance. We have agreed to share the
 money to be transferred into your account, if you agree
 with our proposition as follows;
 (i)25% to the account owner(you).
 (ii)65% for us (the panel officials).
 (iii)10% to be used in settling all expenses (by both
 you and us) incidental to the actualization of this
 project.

 We wish to invest our share of the proceeds of this project
 in foreign stock markets and other viable business till we
 are ready and able to have access to them without raising
 any eyebrows here at home. Please note that this
 transaction is 100% safe and risk-free.
 We intend to effect the transfer within fourteen (14)
 banking days from the date of receipt of the following
 information through the ifax number stated above:Your
 company's name,address,telephone and
 fax

RE: [ZION] Bible vs the Scientists

2002-11-07 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 09:39 AM 11/7/2002, Jim cogently stated:


Seems to me that the contention in this discussion is mostly based on
semantic quibbling.

We're talking about written records of history.  Every incident and
story related in these records is entirely symbolic.  The words and
letters that comprise a written text or an oral narrative are symbols.
Thus it is entirely accurate to say that scriptures are symbolic.

In this context, the argument between literal and symbolic or
figurative loses most of its edge.  It is academic that every bit of
information has to be processed and interpreted.  Scriptures are no
different.  Thus they might accurately be characterized as both
symbolic and literal at the same time.  This argument does nothing
to address the question of how we should approach the scriptural record.



I certainly believe that events written about in the Bible can be both 
actual literal events and yet symbolic at the same time. Why are we so 
hasty to assume that since there is no physical evidence that the walls of 
Jericho tumbled that the event didn't occur. The Twin Towers in New York 
also collapsed but today there is little evidence that the collapse took 
place. Are archeologists of the future going to claim that the twin towers 
collapse never really happened--that it was all symbolic, perhaps of 
America's corruption? The Apostle Paul apparently thought that events of 
the Bible could be both literal and symbolic:

(Galatians 4:22-26.)
22 For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the 
other by a freewoman.
23 But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the 
freewoman was by promise.
24 Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one 
from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar.
25 For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which 
now is, and is in bondage with her children.
26 But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.

Elder Bruce R. McConkie also stated in reference to the above scripture 
that the family makeup and life of Abraham was both literal (actually 
occurred) and symbolic of the two covenants (The Law of Moses and the New 
and Everlasting Covenant):

Paul here uses the life of Abraham as an allegory to dramatize the 
superiority of the gospel over the law of Moses—a mode of teaching designed 
to drive his doctrine home anew each time his hearers think of Abraham and 
his life.

Hagar, the bondwoman, bore Ishmael; and Sarah, the free—woman, brought 
forth Isaac. Ishmael was born after the flesh, while Isaac, as a child of 
promise, came forth after the Spirit. Hagar is thus made to represent the 
old covenant, the law of Moses, the covenant under which men were subject 
to the bondage of sin; while Sarah symbolizes the new covenant, the gospel, 
the covenant under which men are made free, free from bondage and sin 
through Christ.

Mt. Sinai, from whence the law came, and Jerusalem, from whence it is now 
administered, symbolize the law, and their children are in bondage. But the 
spiritual Jerusalem, the heavenly city of which the saints shall be 
citizens, is symbolized by Sarah, and she is the mother of freemen. Sarah, 
who was so long barren, as our spiritual mother, has now made us all, like 
Isaac, heirs of promise.

But it is now, as it was then, those born after the flesh war against those 
born of the Spirit. And as God rejected Ishmael and accepted Isaac, so does 
he now reject those who cleave to the law of Moses and accept those who 
turn to Christ.

The two covenants: The first is the old covenant, the law of Moses, the law 
of carnal commandments, the preparatory gospel, the covenant God made with 
Israel, through Moses, to prepare them for the second. The second is the 
new covenant, the everlasting covenant, the fulness of the gospel, the 
covenant God offers to make with all men, through Christ, to prepare them 
for the fulness of his glory. The old covenant was the lesser law, the new 
is the higher law. Moses was the mediator of the old covenant, standing 
between God and his people, pleading their cause, seeking to prepare them 
for the coming of their Messiah. Jesus is the mediator of the new covenant, 
standing between God and all men, pleading their cause, seeking to prepare 
them for that celestial inheritance reserved for the saints.
See Heb. 12:18-24.
(Bruce R. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 3 vols. [Salt Lake 
City: Bookcraft, 1965-1973], 2: 478.)

In fact you could say that the history of Jacob and Esau, as well as 
Isaac and Ishmael are symbolic of the clash and conflict between Christ and 
Satan. Just because an event actually happened doesn't mean it can't also 
be highly symbolic--and vice versa.





--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Explore Freedom: http://www.geocities.com/graymada

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER

Re: [ZION] scriptures are not secular?

2002-11-07 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 06:33 PM 11/7/2002, JWR wrote:


How do you apply this reasoning to Jesus calling Lazarus forth from his 
tomb, or raising the daughter of Jairus?  Maybe these two were not really 
dead, but by the power of God they recovered while if it hadn't been for 
the blessing they would have died?  Is that what you believe? I personally 
believe that God performs miracles just like the parting of the Red Sea in 
our own day.

Or what about Elijah's contest with the priests of Baal? Perhaps fire was 
not really called down from heaven and consumed the sacrifice but it was 
all mere trickery by Elijah?


--
Steven Montgomery, in sarcasm mode
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] scriptures are not secular?

2002-11-08 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 09:31 AM 11/8/2002, you wrote:


 I'm not going to say Yes, of
 course the actual event happened as described, because it really doesn't
 matter. If it did, great; if not _so what_. I refuse to

The Book of Mormon prophets believed that the water actually parted for 
the Israelites but then closed in upon the Egyptians.  That's one reason 
why I think it matters.

1 Ne. 4: 2
 Therefore let us go up; let us be strong like unto Moses; for he truly 
spake unto the waters of the Red Sea and they divided hither and thither, 
and our fathers came through, out of captivity, on dry ground, and the 
armies of Pharaoh did follow and were drowned in the waters of the Red Sea.

1 Ne. 17: 26
Now ye know that Moses was commanded of the Lord to do that great work; 
and ye know that by his word the waters of the Red Sea were divided hither 
and thither, and they passed through on dry ground.

Hel. 8: 11
Therefore he was constrained to speak more unto them saying: Behold, my 
brethren, have ye not read that God gave power unto one man, even Moses, 
to smite upon the waters of the Red Sea, and they parted hither and 
thither, insomuch that the Israelites, who were our fathers, came through 
upon dry ground, and the waters closed upon the armies of the Egyptians 
and swallowed them up?

=  Mark Gregson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  =

Or how about the words of the Lord Jesus Christ himself:

(Doctrine and Covenants | Section 8:3)
3  Now, behold, this is the spirit of revelation; behold, this is the 
spirit by which Moses brought the children of Israel through the Red Sea on 
dry ground.





--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Taliban in Pakistan

2002-11-08 Thread Steven Montgomery
Not only that but what about the innocents who would undoubtedly lose their 
lives in such an attack?

--
Steven Montgomery

At 10:09 AM 11/8/2002, you wrote:
You weren't attacked by a nation. That's the problem.

Paul Osborne wrote:

 Actually he admitted it on a videotape played on Al-Jezeera television,
 out of
 Doha, Qatar, the day after. He'd prepared the video ahead of time, so
 there's not
 much doubt.

 Right. And, I'm in favor of nuclear strikes if necessary--if that's what
 it takes to knock out those people that support terrorism. And, I'm not
 kidding either. We should have just nuked those mountains instead of
 wasting time going up there to shoot them. We should demonstrate that an
 attack on US soil will be met with the greatest of force. Then, these
 punky nations will learn to fear us and police themselves a little
 better.

 Bomb em, nuke em-- and let em have it! And, I predict that Iraq is about
 to get it really good. You'll see. They deserve it too.

 Paul O
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 
 Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
 Only $9.95 per month!
 Visit www.juno.com

 
/
 ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
 ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
 
/


--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he 
will pick
himself up and continue on ­ Winston Churchill

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author's 
employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/


/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===




Re: [ZION] Best Arguments on Evolution

2002-11-08 Thread Steven Montgomery
It is! How did you find out?

--
Steven Montgomery

At 12:31 PM 11/8/2002, you wrote:

He did. And I couldn't supply one.

It's kind of like saying that the answer to life, the universe and 
everything is 42.

Steven Montgomery wrote:

 I thought John asked for a single best source on the subject, both pro
 and con? grin

 --
 Steven Montgomery

 At 10:43 AM 11/8/2002, you wrote:
 Strictly speaking, I honestly don't know, because I don't consider
 evolution to
 be a moral issue which one is converted to -- it's just a toolset for
 approaching one question on how the physical world works, like any other
 theory.
 You probably suspected I'd respond that way, but it's true.  Also, it's
 difficult
 to give a succinct summary of such a complex theory in this kind of 
forum --
 there's just too much that has to be taught in terms of principles, and
 I'm not
 sure I'm up to it. But in the *spirit* of your request...
 
 I wouldn't suggest this for a beginner, but the best and most up-to-date
 general
 actual textbook, meant for university courses, is probably the 
relatively new,
 but very long book that Stephen Jay Gould published just before he 
died, The
 Structure of Evolutionary Theory. (see
 http://www.chapters.indigo.ca/item.asp?Catalog=BooksSection=BooksCa 
t=Lang=enItem=978067400613mscssid=7EWCQDA2HCDH9N0KVA6BR44QDALM242AWSID=12118329ED39C4EC4ACA9E25931C6F6D34DA1308
 for a description). I believe it's used at BYU for Zoology 475, which 
is the
 evolution course taught by Drs. Whiting and Jeffery this semester, 
from what I
 understand. (For the course's web site, from which you can also get 
the BYU
 package, see http://zoology.byu.edu/zool475/)
 
 If you're interested in apologetics in the sense of 
anti-creationism, the
 talk.origins website is one of the best on-line resources that I know of.
 http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/faqs-qa.html -- they have some good 
FAQs on
 various topics.
 
 The best LDS book I've read, which has the advantage that it doesn't just
 cover
 evolution, but other scientific topics, including the Big Bang, is Clark,
 David
 L.; ed. Of Heaven and Earth: Reconciling Scientific Thought With LDS 
Theology
 (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1998). I have a review and some
 excerpts at:
 http://www.members.shaw.ca/mschindler/A/Of Heaven and Earth.htm
 
 There are two good books by non-LDS on the topic, and they have the
 advantage of
 being inexpensive paperbacks and not overly long and not overly technical:
 
 (Gould, the late well-known Harvard palaeontologist, described himself 
as a
 secular Jewish agnostic, but he's the one who coined the term 
Non-overlapping
 Magisteria (NOMA). He was not the first to refer to the concept, 
however -- I
 have citations from a RC cardinal who tried to help Galileo (who was 
his own
 worst enemy in many ways), and also, intriguingly, the 1931 letter from
 the Heber
 J. Grant 1Presidency to all GAs which is quoted in the article Evolution
 in the
 Encyclopedia of Mormonism. Miller is, I believe, Catholic, but 
definitely a
 believer. He's also a biochemist).
 
 Stephen Jay Gould, Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness 
of Life
 (New York: Ballantine Books, 1999). I'm reading this now and will post a
 review
 to my website when I'm finished.
 
 Miller, Kenneth. Finding Darwin's God: a Scientist's Search for Common 
Ground
 Between God and Evolution (New York: HarperCollins, 1999). (I have a 
review of
 this, along with some excerpts, on my website:
 http://www.members.shaw.ca/mschindler/A/miller.htm
 
 For an interesting essay by a Latter-day Saint on why some GAs have taught
 against evolution, see: 
http://www.whyprophets.com/prophets/evolution.htm  (I
 like this because he agrees with me :-)). Seriously, he says there's a 
common
 conception of evolution which lay people have which is wrong and is a
 straw man.
 The GAs arguments have been, by and large, against this straw man, but 
Chris
 Tolworthy makes the argument that prophets can't always afford to let
 themselves
 get bogged down in detail and have to make a clear statement, and I
 agree with
 this (this is the flip side of being resistant to what I consider
 over-literalistic interpretation; it also allows me to incorporate things
 which
 might at first disturb me, like what I saw to be the flat-out 
ignorance of
 Pres. Smith's Man: His Origin and Destiny, as I put it to my senior home
 teaching
 companion at the time.)
 
 Ironically, one of the best lay explanations of evolution, although 
it's a bit
 outdated, was actually in an official Church magazine. You may recall that
 before
 the correlated new publications of Ensign/Liahona/New Era/Friend came 
out, the
 Sunday School had their own monthly, called The Instructor. Harrison,
 Bertrand F.
 The Relatedness of Living Things, The Instructor, July 1965: 272-276 
is an
 explanation of how evolution works. I have it online at:
 http://www.members.shaw.ca/mschindler/A/eyring_11.htm
 
 And Pres. Stephen L. Richards

Re: [ZION] Taliban in Pakistan

2002-11-08 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 06:32 PM 11/8/2002, you wrote:

Not only that but what about the innocents who would undoubtedly lose
their
lives in such an attack?


IMO, that's all part of the deal. War is hell but we must fight it to win
at minimal cost to our own side and if nuclear bombs will achieve that
end, I am all for it. Whoever attacks this country should be made to pay
the ultimate price and that will set the example for the rest of the
world and probably deter future wars. Nuclear explosions are merciful
because they vaporize a large part of the enemy quickly and get rid of
the problem right away. Everyone is so worried about the innocents.
THAT'S WAR! The Lord and Joshuah weren't worried about the innocents.
Slay them ALL! The object is to win and not take any chances of
loosing. It's dangerous for a bleeding heart liberal to lead troops in a
battle and expect victory. Take that wuss Jimmy Carter for example; Oh
blah! He sent some helicopters into Iran for a rescue and that was a big
fat joke. We should have bombed Iran and set the example back then and
declared the hostages war heros. Then we could have exacted tribute and
filled the coffers of American banks as a further punishment against our
enemies. You mark my words--Iran is going to be a real problem for us in
the not so distant future. We Americans will pay for our failure to bomb
them properly as we should have done.

Paul O
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Very interesting, your approval of total warfare. I take it you also 
approved of the firebombing of Dresden, a non-important city strategically, 
where over 250,000 people, men, woman and children, including wounded who 
had been gathered there, lost their lives in two days?

Prior to the Civil War noncombatants were traditionally and legally by the 
laws of nations left alone. The concept of total war (targeting civilians 
as well as combatants) had its roots in the Civil War (when war would be 
poured out upon all nations) beginning with General Sherman's march to the 
sea.

At least one First Presidency member and noted Constitutional scholar, J. 
Reuben Clark has condemned total warfare. President Clark criticized the 
bombing of Dresden and other cities, even including Hiroshima and Nagasaki 
as unnecessary and barbaric. He stated on one occasion:

Quote
Is it not time in the world for a curb to be placed upon the narrow, 
fiendish concepts of militarists, and their evil lusts and passions by 
which they are constantly driven to plan and carry out ever increasing woe, 
misery, destruction, and slaughter of the aged, the infirm, the sick, the 
crippled? There are elements of good that must control the base in men, 
even in war. How long will their ears be deaf to the cries of the Christian 
conscience of the world, and to their own better instincts as men? How long 
will they challenge the eternal principle voiced by the Master two 
millenniums ago: 'With what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you 
again?' And again: 'Put up again thy sword into his place; for all they 
that take the sword shall perish with the sword. (J. Reuben Clark, 
Conference Report, October 1946, Afternoon Meeting)
/Quote

In addition he also criticized the United States for their role in 
perpetuating total war thusly:

Quote
Thus we in America are now deliberately searching out and developing the 
most savage, murderous means of exterminating peoples that Satan can plant 
in our minds. We do it not only shamelessly, but with a boast. God will not 
forgive us for this.
If we are to avoid extermination, if the world is not to be wiped out, we 
must find some way to curb the fiendish ingenuity of men who have 
apparently no fear of God, man, or the devil, and who are willing to plot 
and plan and invent instrumentalities that will wipe out all the flesh of 
the earth. And, as one American citizen of one hundred thirty millions, as 
one in one billion population of the world, I protest with all of the 
energy I possess against this fiendish activity, and as an American 
citizen, I call upon our government and its agencies to see that these 
unholy experimentations are stopped, and that somehow we get into the minds 
of our war-minded general staff and its satellites, and into the general 
staffs of all the world, a proper respect for human life.
(President J. Reuben Clark, Jr., Conference Report, October 1946, Afternoon 
Meeting 89.)
/Quote





--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Nations are defined by their founders. George Washington set a standard of
selfless public service and heroic private virtue against which American
politicians continue to be measured - and found wanting - even today. 
--Steven W. Mosher 

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html

RE: [ZION] scriptures are not secular?

2002-11-08 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 07:18 PM 11/8/2002, you wrote:

After much pondering, Jim Cobabe favored us with:

This really is a hypothetical, sadly enough.  We apparently are not
currently faithful enough to commonly enjoy such precious manifestations
of the Spirit in our testimony meetings.  This is simply a
generalization of the notion I posited earler in repsonse to this
thread:  As a people, we are not blessed to understand the scriptures
because we fail to study them faithfully.


I agree with this.  Next time you are in sacrament meeting, evaluate each 
speaker.  Ask yourself how effectively he used the scriptures in his 
talk.  Give him a score on a 1 to 5 spectrum:  1=poor, 2=fair, 3=average, 
4=good, 5=outstanding.  Do this for each speaker and find the average for 
the meeting.  If your ward is anything like mine, the average is 
pathetic.  I just assume that the reason they don't use the scriptures in 
their talks is because they don't study them daily at home.  Even temple 
attending saints frequently get up in meeting and speak for 10 or 15 
minutes without once making a reference to the scriptures.


John W. Redelfs   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The youth speakers use the scriptures much more effectively than many 
temple attending Saints in our ward.




--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Liberal dems unveil...

2002-11-08 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 07:20 PM 11/8/2002, you wrote:

After much pondering, Steven Montgomery favored us with:

If the Democratic party hopes to survive they would be wise to move to 
the center by backing Rep. Martin Frost of Texas, a moderate. Which is 
what I think will happen. Choosing Senator Pelosi will ring a death knell 
for the Democratic Party.

In that case, I hope they choose Senator Pelosi.  One of the two main 
parties needs to be done away with so another one can take its place.  I'm 
tired of one-party government masquerading as two-party government.


John W. Redelfs   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I would be tickled pink if the Democratic Party did choose Senator Pelosi. 
I would hold graveyard services to honor their demise and then go out and 
celebrate! ;-)


--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

. . . it is as much their [The Elders of Israel] duty to study correct 
political principles as well as religion, and to seek and know and 
comprehend the social and political interests of man, and to learn and be 
able to teach that which would be best calculated to promote the interests 
of the world.--John Taylor

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Taliban in Pakistan

2002-11-08 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 11:00 PM 11/8/2002, you wrote:

Quote
Thus we in America are now deliberately searching out and developing the
most savage, murderous means of exterminating peoples that Satan can
plant
in our minds. We do it not only shamelessly, but with a boast. God will
not
forgive us for this.
If we are to avoid extermination, if the world is not to be wiped out, we

must find some way to curb the fiendish ingenuity of men who have
apparently no fear of God, man, or the devil, and who are willing to plot

and plan and invent instrumentalities that will wipe out all the flesh of

the earth. And, as one American citizen of one hundred thirty millions,
as
one in one billion population of the world, I protest with all of the
energy I possess against this fiendish activity, and as an American
citizen, I call upon our government and its agencies to see that these
unholy experimentations are stopped, and that somehow we get into the
minds
of our war-minded general staff and its satellites, and into the general
staffs of all the world, a proper respect for human life.
(President J. Reuben Clark, Jr., Conference Report, October 1946,
Afternoon
Meeting 89.)
/Quote



If we didn't develop the atomic bombs and make plenty of them isn't it
possible that we might not be here today to read this quote because the
Russians or some other country would have nuked us? I'm glad that the
above quote is in the archives only and is not quoted in our conferences
today. That would really depress me.

Paul O
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


It might depress you further to know that the United States was 
instrumental in turning over nuclear secrets to the Soviets. Major Racey 
Jordan wrote a book entitled, _Major Jordan's Diaries_, about his part, 
unbeknownst to him at the time, of delivering weapons grade uranium, plans, 
diagrams and other supplies to the Soviets.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Explore Freedom: http://www.geocities.com/graymada

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Liberal dems unveil...

2002-11-09 Thread Steven Montgomery
Who says there needs to be two major parties? I didn't read that in the 1st 
Presidency statement. The Democratic demise would pave the way for one of 
the third party movements, the Constitution party, Libertarian party, 
Independent American Party, etc.

--
Steven Montgomery

At 09:17 AM 11/9/2002, you wrote:
So the official 1st presidency statement of Jan 98 expressing concern at the
predominance of one party in Utah, is like water off a duck's back for you?

Steven Montgomery wrote:

 At 07:20 PM 11/8/2002, you wrote:
 After much pondering, Steven Montgomery favored us with:
 If the Democratic party hopes to survive they would be wise to move to
 the center by backing Rep. Martin Frost of Texas, a moderate. Which is
 what I think will happen. Choosing Senator Pelosi will ring a death knell
 for the Democratic Party.
 
 In that case, I hope they choose Senator Pelosi.  One of the two main
 parties needs to be done away with so another one can take its place.  I'm
 tired of one-party government masquerading as two-party government.
 
 
 John W. Redelfs   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I would be tickled pink if the Democratic Party did choose Senator Pelosi.
 I would hold graveyard services to honor their demise and then go out and
 celebrate! ;-)

 --
 Steven Montgomery
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 . . . it is as much their [The Elders of Israel] duty to study correct
 political principles as well as religion, and to seek and know and
 comprehend the social and political interests of man, and to learn and be
 able to teach that which would be best calculated to promote the interests
 of the world.--John Taylor

 
/
 ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
 ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
 
/


--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he 
will pick
himself up and continue on ­ Winston Churchill

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author's 
employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/


--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

HTML
BODY
a href=http://www.getusout.org;img border=0 
src=http://www.getusout.org/images/guolink.gif;/a
PPBR
/BODY
/HTML

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===



Re: [ZION] Taliban in Pakistan

2002-11-09 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 11:34 AM 11/9/2002, Marc wrote:


Incidentally, one little irony that I'm not sure has been brought up, 
although I'm
sure Mark especially knows this, and probably many others here, is that 
Nagasaki
wasn't the first choice for the second bomb. The original target was 
clouded over
that day, so Nagasaki got hit. The irony is that Nagasaki is the 
historical centre
of Japan's Christian community.  So I guess today's trivia question is: 
what was
the original target?

The primary target was Kokura, a major munitions manufacturing center. 
Kokura was obscured by clouds and smoke (leftover from an earlier raid on a 
nearby city) so the bombadier couldn't get an exact target despite three 
separate passes. The secondary target was Nagasaki which was also obscured 
by clouds but after a couple of passes the clouds parted, and the rest is 
history.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Nations are defined by their founders. George Washington set a standard of
selfless public service and heroic private virtue against which American
politicians continue to be measured - and found wanting - even today. 
--Steven W. Mosher 

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



[ZION] Mars and symbolism

2002-11-09 Thread Steven Montgomery
By August 2003 the red planet will be brighter than Jupiter and the 
brightest object in the sky except Venus and the moon. Since Mars is the 
planet associated with warfare is this a portend of things to come?

http://www.space.com/spacewatch/mars_preview_021108.html

Mars to Get Closer than Ever in Recorded History in 2003
(SPACE.com) - Mars recently emerged into the morning sky and has begun an
orbital dance with Earth that will, over the next several months, lead to
the best viewing opportunity since Neanderthals looked skyward. The Red
Planet is getting progressively closer to Earth with each passing night, and
consequently it will slowly appear to grow larger and brighter. By late
August 2003, when it will be about 191 million miles closer, the reddish
point of light in our night sky will appear more than six times larger and
shine some 85 times brighter than it appears now. More...


--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Taliban in Pakistan

2002-11-09 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 03:46 PM 11/9/2002, Marc wrote:

Trivia question: who was the first country to launch a raid on residential 
areas
in an enemy country in WWII, and what was the city involved?

Great Britain, May 11, 1940. They bombed the quiet peaceful town known as 
Westphalia which was miles from any front. The historian J. F. P. Veale 
notes in his book, _Advance To Barbarism_, that Great Britain's bombing of 
Westphalia was the first deliberate breach of the fundamental rule of 
civilized warfare that hostilities must only be waged against the enemy 
combatant forces.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Nations are defined by their founders. George Washington set a standard of
selfless public service and heroic private virtue against which American
politicians continue to be measured - and found wanting - even today. 
--Steven W. Mosher 

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Taliban in Pakistan

2002-11-09 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 03:46 PM 11/9/2002, Marc wrote:


Trivia question: who first broke neutrality in WWII?


Great Britain, September 3, 1940, ostensibly to guarantee the territorial 
integrity of Poland. However after the war Poland was divvied up to the 
Soviets--so what the heck was WWII fought for?

Interestingly enough, President Roosevelt urged the military combatants on 
both sides to refrain from bombing cities or civilian populations. 
Churchill and the French promised that only strictly military targets would 
be bombed by their air forces.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Nations are defined by their founders. George Washington set a standard of
selfless public service and heroic private virtue against which American
politicians continue to be measured - and found wanting - even today. 
--Steven W. Mosher 

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Taliban in Pakistan

2002-11-09 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 03:46 PM 11/9/2002, Marc wrote:


Trivia question: what major Ally's naval assets were destroyed by another 
Ally,
and why?

This was a harder one, but I think I remember it was the Germans who 
scuttled Italy's ships to prevent them from falling into Allied hands. Am I 
right?



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Nations are defined by their founders. George Washington set a standard of
selfless public service and heroic private virtue against which American
politicians continue to be measured - and found wanting - even today. 
--Steven W. Mosher 

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Liberal dems unveil...

2002-11-09 Thread Steven Montgomery
I'm just as concerned about one party domination as you are. One problem is 
that the Democratic Party has steered themselves way too far to the left. 
Meanwhile the Republican Party is full of RINO's (Republican in name only). 
What I meant to say previously was that there is no requirement that there 
only be two parties, I would like to see the third parties given more fair 
play in the media instead of the short shrift they are usually given.

--
Steven Montgomery

At 03:48 PM 11/9/2002, you wrote:
That may be why Pres. Hinckley asked Pres. Jensen to give an interview to the
Tribune to underscore the point -- too many Utahns didn't understand the 
point the
first time around. Even afterwards, one Rep. rep. publicly criticized 
Pres. Jensen
for what he said. The guy has more guts than I do -- I'd never publicly 
criticize
the brethren like that. But it gave me an insight into what they're up against
there in Utah.

Steven Montgomery wrote:

 Who says there needs to be two major parties? I didn't read that in the 1st
 Presidency statement. The Democratic demise would pave the way for one of
 the third party movements, the Constitution party, Libertarian party,
 Independent American Party, etc.

 --
 Steven Montgomery

 At 09:17 AM 11/9/2002, you wrote:
 So the official 1st presidency statement of Jan 98 expressing concern 
at the
 predominance of one party in Utah, is like water off a duck's back for 
you?
 
 Steven Montgomery wrote:
 
   At 07:20 PM 11/8/2002, you wrote:
   After much pondering, Steven Montgomery favored us with:
   If the Democratic party hopes to survive they would be wise to 
move to
   the center by backing Rep. Martin Frost of Texas, a moderate. 
Which is
   what I think will happen. Choosing Senator Pelosi will ring a 
death knell
   for the Democratic Party.
   
   In that case, I hope they choose Senator Pelosi.  One of the two main
   parties needs to be done away with so another one can take its 
place.  I'm
   tired of one-party government masquerading as two-party government.
   
   
   John W. Redelfs   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   I would be tickled pink if the Democratic Party did choose Senator 
Pelosi.
   I would hold graveyard services to honor their demise and then go 
out and
   celebrate! ;-)
  
   --
   Steven Montgomery
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   . . . it is as much their [The Elders of Israel] duty to study correct
   political principles as well as religion, and to seek and know and
   comprehend the social and political interests of man, and to learn 
and be
   able to teach that which would be best calculated to promote the 
interests
   of the world.--John Taylor
  
  
  
/
   ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
   ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
  
  
/
  
 
 --
 Marc A. Schindler
 Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland
 
 Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he
 will pick
 himself up and continue on ­ Winston Churchill
 
 Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the 
author
 solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author's
 employer,
 nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.
 
 /// 
//
 ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
 ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
 /// 
//
 

 --
 Steven Montgomery
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 HTML
 BODY
 a href=http://www.getusout.org;img border=0
 src=http://www.getusout.org/images/guolink.gif;/a
 PPBR
 /BODY
 /HTML

 
/
 ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
 ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
 
/


--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he 
will pick
himself up and continue on ­ Winston Churchill

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author's 
employer, nor
those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/


/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html

Re: [ZION] Taliban in Pakistan

2002-11-09 Thread Steven Montgomery
LDS, and the plane was named after his mother. What do I win now?

--
Steven Montgomery

At 03:49 PM 11/9/2002, you wrote:

Steven wins first prize! A one-week holiday in beautiful downtown Moose Jaw in
the second week of January.
Okay. Here's another question: what was the religious denomination of the 
pilot,
and after whom did he name the plane? (I'm thinking specifically of the 
Enola Gay
here)

Steven Montgomery wrote:

 At 11:34 AM 11/9/2002, Marc wrote:

 Incidentally, one little irony that I'm not sure has been brought up,
 although I'm
 sure Mark especially knows this, and probably many others here, is that
 Nagasaki
 wasn't the first choice for the second bomb. The original target was
 clouded over
 that day, so Nagasaki got hit. The irony is that Nagasaki is the
 historical centre
 of Japan's Christian community.  So I guess today's trivia question is:
 what was
 the original target?

 The primary target was Kokura, a major munitions manufacturing center.
 Kokura was obscured by clouds and smoke (leftover from an earlier raid on a
 nearby city) so the bombadier couldn't get an exact target despite three
 separate passes. The secondary target was Nagasaki which was also obscured
 by clouds but after a couple of passes the clouds parted, and the rest is
 history.

 --
 Steven Montgomery
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Nations are defined by their founders. George Washington set a standard of
 selfless public service and heroic private virtue against which American
 politicians continue to be measured - and found wanting - even today.
 --Steven W. Mosher

 
/
 ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
 ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
 
/


--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he 
will pick
himself up and continue on ­ Winston Churchill

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author's 
employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/


/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===




Re: [ZION] Taliban in Pakistan

2002-11-09 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 08:12 PM 11/9/2002, Marc wrote:


Hmm, which reminds me of my other trivia question that I'm not sure I phrased
properly. I was trying to bring out that the French fleet had been taken to
French West Africa (Algiers?) for protection when France was invaded. The 
British
scuttled the entire French fleet at one fell swoop, to prevent them from 
falling
into German hands and/or for fear that the Vichy French would use them in
cooperation with the Germans, much to DeGaulle's consternation.

I knew somebodies fleet was scuttled, i just forgot who the actors were.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Nations are defined by their founders. George Washington set a standard of
selfless public service and heroic private virtue against which American
politicians continue to be measured - and found wanting - even today. 
--Steven W. Mosher 

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



RE: [ZION] Liberal dems unveil...

2002-11-09 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 08:17 PM 11/9/2002, you wrote:


Steven Montgomery wrote:
---
I'm just as concerned about one party domination as you are. One problem
is that the Democratic Party has steered themselves way too far to the
left.
---

It appears to me that partisan affiliation is largely irrelevant, at
least at the national level.  Both major national parties promote
platform issues that are morally unacceptable, insupportable, and
insufferable, to any person still gifted with the light of Christ.  In
fact, in the deepest darkest depths of these organizations lurk evils so
horrifyingly abominable that it amazes me to see apparently otherwise
decent people so associate themselves.  They are truly  Gadianton Bands,
fulfilling every item on the checklist of devilish evil and depravity.
Beneath the centrist mask, many of the principal policy makers openly
espouse ideals that would compromise the very social and political
foundations of the world.  If such fundamentally evil people ever come
to power unopposed and free to act, it will be a day of great calamity.

This far, in this modern age, we have been fortunate that these forces
must continually compromise their true inclinations to disguise the real
evil they intend.

---
Mij Ebaboc


I pretty much agree with your assessment.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] Liberal dems unveil...

2002-11-09 Thread Steven Montgomery
Actually I've pondered the possibility of running as a democrat in the next 
State House election. The incumbent who just got reelected ran unopposed, 
there was no challenger from the Democratic Party.

--
Steven Montgomery

At 08:18 PM 11/9/2002, you wrote:
Not so far to the left that at least two well-known GAs have been active 
in the
Utah party: Presidents Marlin K. Jensen and Faust. Pres. Jensen explained 
why, and
what he felt he and like-minded LDS could do as a leavening contributor, 
in his
famous interview with the Trib.

Steven Montgomery wrote:

 I'm just as concerned about one party domination as you are. One problem is
 that the Democratic Party has steered themselves way too far to the left.
 Meanwhile the Republican Party is full of RINO's (Republican in name only).
 What I meant to say previously was that there is no requirement that there
 only be two parties, I would like to see the third parties given more fair
 play in the media instead of the short shrift they are usually given.

 --
 Steven Montgomery

 At 03:48 PM 11/9/2002, you wrote:
 That may be why Pres. Hinckley asked Pres. Jensen to give an interview 
to the
 Tribune to underscore the point -- too many Utahns didn't understand the
 point the
 first time around. Even afterwards, one Rep. rep. publicly criticized
 Pres. Jensen
 for what he said. The guy has more guts than I do -- I'd never publicly
 criticize
 the brethren like that. But it gave me an insight into what they're up 
against
 there in Utah.
 
 Steven Montgomery wrote:
 
   Who says there needs to be two major parties? I didn't read that in 
the 1st
   Presidency statement. The Democratic demise would pave the way for 
one of
   the third party movements, the Constitution party, Libertarian party,
   Independent American Party, etc.
  
   --
   Steven Montgomery
  
   At 09:17 AM 11/9/2002, you wrote:
   So the official 1st presidency statement of Jan 98 expressing concern
  at the
   predominance of one party in Utah, is like water off a duck's back for
  you?
   
   Steven Montgomery wrote:
   
 At 07:20 PM 11/8/2002, you wrote:
 After much pondering, Steven Montgomery favored us with:
 If the Democratic party hopes to survive they would be wise to
  move to
 the center by backing Rep. Martin Frost of Texas, a moderate.
  Which is
 what I think will happen. Choosing Senator Pelosi will ring a
  death knell
 for the Democratic Party.
 
 In that case, I hope they choose Senator Pelosi.  One of the 
two main
 parties needs to be done away with so another one can take its
  place.  I'm
 tired of one-party government masquerading as two-party 
government.
 
 
 John W. Redelfs   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I would be tickled pink if the Democratic Party did choose Senator
  Pelosi.
 I would hold graveyard services to honor their demise and then go
  out and
 celebrate! ;-)

 --
 Steven Montgomery
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 . . . it is as much their [The Elders of Israel] duty to study 
correct
 political principles as well as religion, and to seek and know and
 comprehend the social and political interests of man, and to learn
  and be
 able to teach that which would be best calculated to promote the
  interests
 of the world.--John Taylor


   
  
/
 ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
 ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///

   
  
/

   
   --
   Marc A. Schindler
   Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland
   
   Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he
   will pick
   himself up and continue on ­ Winston Churchill
   
   Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the
  author
   solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author's
   employer,
   nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.
   
   /// 

  //
   ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
   ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
   /// 

  //
   
  
   --
   Steven Montgomery
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   HTML
   BODY
   a href=http://www.getusout.org;img border=0
   src=http://www.getusout.org/images/guolink.gif;/a
   PPBR
   /BODY
   /HTML
  
  
  
/
   ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
   ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
  
  
/
  
 
 --
 Marc A. Schindler
 Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland
 
 Man

Re: [ZION] Taliban in Pakistan

2002-11-09 Thread Steven Montgomery
At least when the temperature gets cold here (Cedar City area) in February 
I can jump in the car and in 40 minutes be in short sleeve weather.

--
Steven Montgomery

At 08:19 PM 11/9/2002, you wrote:
Yet another week in Moose Jaw, but in early February this time. Maybe 
we'll allow a
side-trip to Medicine Hat, the 40-40 city (where it's either plus 40 or 
minus 40 o
C; nothing in between).

Steven Montgomery wrote:

 LDS, and the plane was named after his mother. What do I win now?

 --
 Steven Montgomery

 At 03:49 PM 11/9/2002, you wrote:
 Steven wins first prize! A one-week holiday in beautiful downtown 
Moose Jaw in
 the second week of January.
 Okay. Here's another question: what was the religious denomination of the
 pilot,
 and after whom did he name the plane? (I'm thinking specifically of the
 Enola Gay
 here)
 
 Steven Montgomery wrote:
 
   At 11:34 AM 11/9/2002, Marc wrote:
  
   Incidentally, one little irony that I'm not sure has been brought up,
   although I'm
   sure Mark especially knows this, and probably many others here, is 
that
   Nagasaki
   wasn't the first choice for the second bomb. The original target was
   clouded over
   that day, so Nagasaki got hit. The irony is that Nagasaki is the
   historical centre
   of Japan's Christian community.  So I guess today's trivia 
question is:
   what was
   the original target?
  
   The primary target was Kokura, a major munitions manufacturing center.
   Kokura was obscured by clouds and smoke (leftover from an earlier 
raid on a
   nearby city) so the bombadier couldn't get an exact target despite 
three
   separate passes. The secondary target was Nagasaki which was also 
obscured
   by clouds but after a couple of passes the clouds parted, and the 
rest is
   history.
  
   --
   Steven Montgomery
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   Nations are defined by their founders. George Washington set a 
standard of
   selfless public service and heroic private virtue against which 
American
   politicians continue to be measured - and found wanting - even today.
   --Steven W. Mosher
  
  
  
/
   ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
   ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
  
  
/
  
 
 --
 Marc A. Schindler
 Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland
 
 Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he
 will pick
 himself up and continue on ­ Winston Churchill
 
 Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the 
author
 solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author's
 employer,
 nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.
 
 /// 
//
 ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
 ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
 /// 
//
 

 
/
 ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
 ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
 
/


--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he 
will pick
himself up and continue on ­ Winston Churchill

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author's 
employer, nor
those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/


/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===




Re: [ZION] Liberal dems unveil...

2002-11-10 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 09:23 PM 11/9/2002, Marc wrote:

in my opinion). Melchin is Progressive Conservative, which is the dynasty 
here,
and has been since 1970 or so.

Now there's an oxymoron if I ever heard one. How can one claim to be a 
progressive (which has socialist roots) and conservative (which 
ostensibly should be anti-socialist) at the same time?



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Nations are defined by their founders. George Washington set a standard of
selfless public service and heroic private virtue against which American
politicians continue to be measured - and found wanting - even today. 
--Steven W. Mosher 

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Truman (was Taliban in pakistan)

2002-11-12 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 08:15 PM 11/11/2002, Gary wrote:



Wilford Woodruff divided the nations after WWI, including making a new
nation called Yugoslavia.


He did? grin If so, he must have done so as a resurrected being. ;-)


--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

. . . it is as much their [The Elders of Israel] duty to study correct 
political principles as well as religion, and to seek and know and 
comprehend the social and political interests of man, and to learn and be 
able to teach that which would be best calculated to promote the interests 
of the world.--John Taylor

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] War against Islam

2002-11-12 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 08:25 PM 11/11/2002, Gary wrote:


Their Jihad is on the same level as the Christian Crusades. Those who
went on the Crusades were promised everlasting life. They were told to
use whatever means to obtain the holy city. And they did. They were
ruthless, killing men, women and children. They even toppled
Constantinople, an Orthodox Christian city!

So it is with the Jihad today. It is a holy war. In holy war, or a
Crusade, people will do whatever is necessary to obtain victory and
heaven.


For an interesting look at the various meanings behind Jihad, including 
that of the Islamic Fundamentalists, I recommend: 
http://www.danielpipes.org/article/498



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Nations are defined by their founders. George Washington set a standard of
selfless public service and heroic private virtue against which American
politicians continue to be measured - and found wanting - even today. 
--Steven W. Mosher 

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Taliban in Pakistan

2002-11-12 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 01:43 PM 11/12/2002, you wrote:

At 08:00 PM 11/8/2002 -0700, Steven wrote:

Prior to the Civil War noncombatants were traditionally and legally by 
the laws of nations left alone. The concept of total war (targeting 
civilians as well as combatants) had its roots in the Civil War (when war 
would be poured out upon all nations) beginning with General Sherman's 
march to the sea.

Hogwash! Traditionally, raping and looting were the means by which the 
troops were paid.   War is Hell did not originate with Sherman.

Rick Mathis

I was talking about civilized nations here. Internationally, beginning 
about the 1600's or so, there were several treaties which detailed nations 
conduct during war. Somewhat similar to the Geneva Convention for example, 
which proscribes signatories from bombing hospitals and outlines proper 
procedures for handling the captured (POW's).



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Nations are defined by their founders. George Washington set a standard of
selfless public service and heroic private virtue against which American
politicians continue to be measured - and found wanting - even today. 
--Steven W. Mosher 

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Taliban in Pakistan

2002-11-12 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 08:00 PM 11/12/2002, you wrote:

After much pondering, Steven Montgomery favored us with:

I was talking about civilized nations here. Internationally, beginning 
about the 1600's or so, there were several treaties which detailed 
nations conduct during war. Somewhat similar to the Geneva Convention for 
example, which proscribes signatories from bombing hospitals and outlines 
proper procedures for handling the captured (POW's).

So how successful have these rules been that attempt to make civilized 
that which cannot be civilized?  --JWR

Not very I have to admit.


--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

HTML
BODY
a href=http://www.getusout.org;img border=0 
src=http://www.getusout.org/images/guolink.gif;/a
PPBR
/BODY
/HTML

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Taliban in Pakistan

2002-11-12 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 08:00 PM 11/12/2002, you wrote:

After much pondering, Steven Montgomery favored us with:

I was talking about civilized nations here. Internationally, beginning 
about the 1600's or so, there were several treaties which detailed 
nations conduct during war. Somewhat similar to the Geneva Convention for 
example, which proscribes signatories from bombing hospitals and outlines 
proper procedures for handling the captured (POW's).

So how successful have these rules been that attempt to make civilized 
that which cannot be civilized?  --JWR

According to President Benson, one of the purposes of the Book of Mormon is 
so that armies will know how to conduct themselves during war. I can't find 
the reference right off hand but I remember the statement.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Nations are defined by their founders. George Washington set a standard of
selfless public service and heroic private virtue against which American
politicians continue to be measured - and found wanting - even today. 
--Steven W. Mosher 

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Truman (was Taliban in pakistan)

2002-11-13 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 09:44 AM 11/13/2002, Marc wrote:


Nobody does anything out of ideology anymore.


I disagree. What about the ideology underlying the drive for power and gain?



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Explore Freedom: http://www.geocities.com/graymada

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




[ZION] Hardwired for God?

2002-11-13 Thread Steven Montgomery
Hardwired for God?
http://www.ldsmag.com/sci_rel/021112wired.html


--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] Hardwired for God?

2002-11-13 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 06:41 PM 11/13/2002, Marc wrote:

I read that. Be careful with John Pratt -- he's into some pretty scary stuff
involving signs and tokens in his own semi-public ceremonies involving what he
calls the Enoch calendar. Details available upon request. But more to the 
point,
and staying away from personal attacks, he discusses a book that's making 
quite a
splash (Why God Won't Go Away) but fails to note that while this book is 
popular
-- it was mentioned on Indigo.ca's main page the last time I was there 
(Indigo is
Canada's largest book chain) -- it has received poor reviews from 
scientists for
its poor science. It's one thing to criticize a book for its conclusions, 
but if
it misrepresents itself, that's a problem, and the poor reviews are, in my
opinion, well-founded. Why? I won't get into the science per se, but the 
two guys
who wrote it, while they have scientific bona fides, are a little out of their
field when it comes to philosophy. They ironically try to show that there is a
spiritual plane which exists in the physical world, a view that's known as
reductionism, or rationalist materialism, and a philosophy we LDS would have a
hard time with. It's the basis for atheism: that all so-called 
spirituality has a
physical basis. My worry on behalf of Meridian is blow back when some of the
nonsense Pratt's into backfire onto a very nice couple (the Proctors, who 
put out
Meridian).

Well, Pratt did say that none of the books he looked at, one of them being, 
_Why God Won't Go Away_, were worth the money he was going to spend on 
them. Besides, his article was not a book review.

I agree with you regarding the basis for materialism. Marxist scientists 
have for decades attempted to establish a material basis for spiritual 
experiences, that is nothing new. However, that is not what Pratt was 
driving at. Pratt clearly states that there is a relationship between the 
brain and spiritual experiences but that we need to be careful not to draw 
conclusions without taking both the spiritual and material elements into 
consideration. Imo, the brain acts as sort of an interface, if you will, 
between body and spirit.

Imo, Pratt is very much into the doctrine behind Moses 6: 63, that all 
things bear record of Christ. If it is true that all things bear record 
of Christ then it should not be surprising that astronomical and 
calendrical events might also bear testimony in some majestic way of the 
Savior of all mankind (See my sig file below). I look at Pratt's research 
in much the same manner as I do Avraham Gileadi's. Gileadi was a 
pathbreaker by exposing lay members of the Church to the learning of the 
Jews and how that learning can broaden and deepen ones understanding of 
scripture. Pratt does much the same thing in a different manner by exposing 
members of the Church to celestial and date events and how those can indeed 
bear record of Christ. I don't agree with all the conclusions that Gileadi 
makes and neither do I with Pratt, but I also don't throw out all of their 
good and valuable research as crackpot just because I have disagreements 
with various areas of their work. Besides, I don't base my testimony or 
doctrinal understanding on personalities, and you can be assured that If 
and when somebodies actions does become pretty scary, aside from 
Samuelson's wrong headed opinion of a harmless skit, that I'll distance 
myself completely from that particular personality.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Recall the new star that announced the birth at Bethlehem? It was in its 
precise orbit long before it so shone. We are likewise placed in human 
orbits to illuminate. Divine correlation functions not only in the cosmos 
but on this planet, too. After all, the Book of Mormon plates were not 
buried in Belgium, only to have Joseph Smith born centuries later in 
distant Bombay. (Elder Neal A. Maxwell, Conference Report, Saturday 
Morning, Oct 2002)

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Hardwired for God?

2002-11-14 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 11:37 PM 11/13/2002, Marc wrote:


Speaking of the star of Bethlehem, I'm sure you have heard most of the 
theories as
to what it might have been. What would be your reaction if you learned that it
might actually be an astrological phenomenon, and that it didn't happen in 
1 A.D.?

--
Marc A. Schindler

Actually Pratt discussed this possibility in an article which appears on 
the Griffith Observatory website (as well as other places, including 
Pratt's own website):
http://www.griffithobs.org/IPSPlanPlatt.html

The most likely date he gives is during Passover, 1 BC. I should mention 
that to the Jews (at least those not in apostasy) astrology as a method of 
predicting the future was blasphemous. However, they did believe that stars 
(and other celestial events) were signs of God's works. Genesis 1:14, for 
starters, states that these celestial objects and events are signs--to make 
known his will and purposes.

A good overview of the different celestial (astrological) events regarding 
what might have been the Star of Bethlehem is available here:
http://sciastro.net/portia/articles/thestar.htm


--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Recall the new star that announced the birth at Bethlehem? It was in its 
precise orbit long before it so shone. We are likewise placed in human 
orbits to illuminate. Divine correlation functions not only in the cosmos 
but on this planet, too. After all, the Book of Mormon plates were not 
buried in Belgium, only to have Joseph Smith born centuries later in 
distant Bombay. (Elder Neal A. Maxwell, Conference Report, Saturday 
Morning, Oct 2002)

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] truman the villain

2002-11-14 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 10:51 AM 11/14/2002, Gary wrote:



If it were just us against the North Koreans, I can see your point. But
as Jesus told us that the wise man counts his pennies before building the
house, we had to determine just what level of interdiction we were
willing to make in Korea. Given that the Soviets would have jumped in on
the war if we were to have invaded China, we were looking at nuclear
holocaust. Truman wasn't willing to go that far, and I thank him for it.


Were it not for economic and technical assistance given to the Soviet Union 
and Red China by the United States the North Koreans would never have 
invaded the South. They wouldn't have been in a position to do so. In fact, 
a good position can be made that it was aid, trade and diplomacy which 
built up the Soviet Union, Red China, and their satellite states over the 
years. The Russian invasion of Afghanistan being a good case in point. How 
did the Russians invade Afghanistan? Over a highway built by U.S. Foreign 
Aid Dollars with trucks built at the Kama River Truck Plant also built by 
U.S. help.


--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

HTML
BODY
a href=http://www.getusout.org;img border=0 
src=http://www.getusout.org/images/guolink.gif;/a
PPBR
/BODY
/HTML

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Hardwired for God?

2002-11-14 Thread Steven Montgomery
Mazzaroth. Job 38:32.

--
Steven Montgomery

At 12:11 PM 11/14/2002, Marc wrote:

Actually ancients did not make a distinction between astrology and 
astronomy as we
do -- the prohibition against astrology is being read back into the OT, 
which is
anachronistic. Zodiac mosaics have been found on the floors of 1st century BC
synagogues in Israel, and the zodiac (as in the Babylonian system of 12 
houses)
actually appears at one point in Job, although they don't use the English 
word.
Anyone know what it's called?

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] truman the villain

2002-11-14 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 05:42 PM 11/14/2002, you wrote:

After much pondering, Steven Montgomery favored us with:

Were it not for economic and technical assistance given to the Soviet 
Union and Red China by the United States the North Koreans would never 
have invaded the South. They wouldn't have been in a position to do so. 
In fact, a good position can be made that it was aid, trade and diplomacy 
which built up the Soviet Union, Red China, and their satellite states 
over the years. The Russian invasion of Afghanistan being a good case in 
point. How did the Russians invade Afghanistan? Over a highway built by 
U.S. Foreign Aid Dollars with trucks built at the Kama River Truck Plant 
also built by U.S. help.

Specifically by Ford with the authorization of our government.  And I'll 
bet it was financed with government guaranteed loans backed by the good 
credit of the American taxpayer.  --JWR

Exactly so. $153 million from the export-import bank ran by William J. 
Casey at the time. The bank providing the money was David Rockefeller's 
Chase Manhattan Bank. Other contractors involved in building the Kama River 
Truck Plant besides the Ford Company was Glidden Machine  Tool Company, 
Gulf and Western Industries, Honeywell, the Swindell-Dressler Company, 
Warner  Swazey, the Ingersoll Milling Machine Company, and the E.W. Bliss 
Company.


--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

. . . it is as much their [The Elders of Israel] duty to study correct 
political principles as well as religion, and to seek and know and 
comprehend the social and political interests of man, and to learn and be 
able to teach that which would be best calculated to promote the interests 
of the world.--John Taylor

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: Populations (was Re: [ZION] umbrella)

2002-11-14 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 06:16 PM 11/14/2002, you wrote:

After much pondering, Mark Gregson favored us with:

Oh, and as an interesting side note, proven oil reserves have increased 
over the past decade.  In other words, the world continues to use oil at 
a phenomenal rate (75 million barrels per day = about 28 billion barrels 
per year) and yet the amount left over continues to _increase_ (from 1 
trillion to 1.05 trillion in about ten years).  At this rate, we will 
never run out of oil but will rather have more and more all the time.  A 
barrel is equal to 159 litres (42 gallons).  And the proven reserves do 
not even include the Alberta Oil Sands which have more oil than the rest 
of the world put together, one quarter of which is believed to be 
economically and technically retrievable.

Not only that, it is meaningless to talk about proven oil reserves without 
linking it to the price of crude.  As the price of crude goes up, oil 
reserves that are not commercially viable become viable.  Raise the price 
of crude enough, and this earth has many times it current viable oil 
reserves, many times our needs for that matter, because as the price goes 
up, the demand goes down.


John W. Redelfs   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Also, as the price goes up so does the demand for more drilling and 
exploration, hence more reserves.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Nations are defined by their founders. George Washington set a standard of
selfless public service and heroic private virtue against which American
politicians continue to be measured - and found wanting - even today. 
--Steven W. Mosher 

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Hardwired for God?

2002-11-15 Thread Steven Montgomery
Ok, I'll take another weeks vacation at Moose Jaw then. Btw, is my vacation 
there fully transferable? ;-)

--
Steven Montgomery

At 08:36 PM 11/14/2002, you wrote:
You are right and I am wrong (except on one minor point)-- on re-reading 
it, I see
he bases his calculation on the Julian calendar, not the Gregorian 
calendar, which
is what I assumed (since his conclusions are expressed in terms of the 
Gregorian
calendar.:

Here's a link that explains this in much more detail:
http://www.stjohndc.org/what/9609ca1.htm

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




[ZION] Daily Utah Chronicle

2002-11-15 Thread Steven Montgomery
The following URL is sure to excite some controversy. Apparently a fellow 
mormon and U of U student, Daniel Thatcher, has written a piece in the 
Daily Utah Chronicle, which is highly critical of the lopsidedness which 
exists in Utah politics. Among other things he mentions the Marlin Jensen 
article, President Benson's statement that it is impossible to be a 
democrat (Thatcher leaves out the liberal part of Benson's quote) and a 
good member at the same time, a piece by liberal propagandist Paul Rolly of 
the Salt Lake Tribune wherein Rolly claims that Republicans are further 
from actual LDS positions that the democrats are, occasionally interspersed 
with selective scriptures, etc. Here is the URL, what do you think?
http://www.dailyutahchronicle.com/news/325065.html?mkey=559711

Of course, I should mention that Thatcher also recently published a piece 
in the same paper entitled, Confessions of a Mormon Socialist.
http://www.dailyutahchronicle.com/news/292850.html


--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Nations are defined by their founders. George Washington set a standard of
selfless public service and heroic private virtue against which American
politicians continue to be measured - and found wanting - even today. 
--Steven W. Mosher 

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Hardwired for God?

2002-11-15 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 01:27 PM 11/15/2002, you wrote:



Steven Montgomery wrote:

 Ok, I'll take another weeks vacation at Moose Jaw then. Btw, is my vacation
 there fully transferable? ;-)

Sure. To Bawlf, Alberta, in the middle of the Palliser Triangle (a 
semi-desert).
I'd stick with Moose Jaw if I were you...

Shucks. I was hoping to unload it on our local tradio.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Nations are defined by their founders. George Washington set a standard of
selfless public service and heroic private virtue against which American
politicians continue to be measured - and found wanting - even today. 
--Steven W. Mosher 

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



[ZION] Hu's On First?

2002-11-20 Thread Steven Montgomery
APOLOGIES TO ABBOT AND COSTELLO
HU'S ON FIRST
(We take you now to the Oval Office.)
http://www.boortz.com/nealznuz.htm



George: Condi! Nice to see you. What's happening?
Condi: Sir, I have the report here about the new leader of China.
George: Great. Lay it on me.
Condi: Hu is the new leader of China.
George: That's what I want to know.
Condi: That's what I'm telling you.
George: That's what I'm asking you. Who is the new leader of China?
Condi: Yes.
George: I mean the fellow's name.
Condi: Hu.
George: The guy in China.
Condi: Hu.
George: The new leader of China.
Condi: Hu.
George: The Chinaman!
Condi: Hu is leading China.
George: Now whaddya' asking me for?
Condi: I'm telling you Hu is leading China.
George: Well, I'm asking you. Who is leading China?
Condi: That's the man's name.
George: That's who's name?
Condi: Yes.
George: Will you or will you not tell me the name of the new leader of
China?
Condi: Yes, sir.
George: Yassir? Yassir Arafat is in China? I thought he was in the Middle
East.
Condi: That's correct.
George: Then who is in China?
Condi: Yes, sir.
George: Yassir is in China?
Condi: No, sir.
George: Then who is?
Condi: Yes, sir.
George: Yassir?
Condi: No, sir.
George: Look, Condi. I need to know the name of the new leader of China.
Get me the Secretary General of the U.N. on the phone.
Condi: Kofi?
George: No, thanks.
Condi: You want Kofi?
George: No.
Condi: You don't want Kofi.
George: No. But now that you mention it, I could use a glass of milk. And 
then get me the U.N.
Condi: Yes, sir.
George: Not Yassir! The guy at the U.N.
Condi: Kofi?
George: Milk! Will you please make the call?
Condi: And call who?
George: Who is the guy at the U.N?
Condi: Hu is the guy in China.
George: Will you stay out of China?!
Condi: Yes, sir.
George: And stay out of the Middle East! Just get me the guy at the U.N.
Condi: Kofi.
George: All right! With cream and two sugars. Now get on the phone.
(Condi picks up the phone.)
Condi: Rice, here.
George: Rice? Good idea. And a couple of egg rolls, too. Maybe we should 
send some to the guy in China. And the Middle East. Can you get Chinese 
food in the Middle East?


--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Recall the new star that announced the birth at Bethlehem? It was in its 
precise orbit long before it so shone. We are likewise placed in human 
orbits to illuminate. Divine correlation functions not only in the cosmos 
but on this planet, too. After all, the Book of Mormon plates were not 
buried in Belgium, only to have Joseph Smith born centuries later in 
distant Bombay. (Elder Neal A. Maxwell, Conference Report, Saturday 
Morning, Oct 2002)

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Does America need to be destroyed

2002-11-21 Thread Steven Montgomery
Gary,

Well I guess time will tell which one of us is more correct. I would 
respond in more detail but I just got back from surgery (Ouch! Where are my 
pain pills?) so I hope you'll forgive me for not responding in more detail.

--
Steven Montgomery

At 09:38 AM 11/21/2002, you wrote:
Steven:
I used to believe that the mark of the beast certainly referred to an
intrusive, all powerful government, which held its subjects in economic
bondage, by forcing them to submit to some kind of microchip implant or
in
some other manner with the number of the beast. As I've studied
Revelation
further however I've changed my views. Here is why:

Gary: I agree with much of your premises, but believe there will be a
major government involved. I don't think it will control all the world,
but mainly the Old World. In the New World will be another major
government emerge, called Zion.

Steven:
One of the overarching themes of the Book of Revelations deals with the
victory that Jesus Christ and the righteous have over Satan, Babylon and
mankind's twin nemesis, both Spiritual and Physical Death. The righteous,

we are informed by Revelations 15:2 are those who gain victory over the
Beast and thus qualify to live on this earth in its Celestial Glory.

Gary: I believe you mean a Terrestrial Glory, as the earth will not
become celestialized until at the end of the Millennium. It is highly
possible that the righteous with the mark of Christ are not just
celestial beings, but also the terrestrial.

Steven:  It's interesting to note that those who accept Christ and
overcome Satan
are sealed up unto eternal life by having Christ's name written on their
foreheads (see Rev. 7:3 and 22:4). Under the law of Moses the Israelites
were commanded to wear phylacteries on their hands or frontlets upon
their
foreheads which were little boxes that contained certain scriptures
written
inside them as a sign unto thee upon thine hand, and for a memorial
between thine eyes, that the Lord's law may be in thy mouth or in other
words that the righteous were to treasure up the words of Christ in their

heart and soul and to physically bind these items on their hands or
foreheads as a sign of this fact (see Exodus 13:9,16; Deut. 6:8; 11:18).

Gary: There clearly is a symbolic level to the marks. But often there are
both physical and spiritual parts of a symbol. Babylon, for example, is
an actual city in antiquity. It also symbolically represents the
telestial world, built on greed and power. Although not all the wicked
may have the physical mark on their hands/foreheads, it is possible that
many will; while all will have the spiritual mark of Babylon/Satan on
them. I believe we will see a physical mark put into place in Europe
before long, as part of the EU.

Steven:
Satan, as the great counterfeiter, also seals his followers with a mark

in their hand or forehead. But what is this mark
and what does it represent? Is it an actual physical mark or merely
symbolic? What characterizes those who have the mark?

Gary: As I said, it is both physical and symbolic in nature.

Steven:
As a result of the fall of Adam and without the atonement of Jesus
Christ,
man is carnal sensual and devilish. Thus Satan causes ALL, both small
and
great, rich and poor, free and bond to receive his mark in their right
hand or in their forehead. Since this is a mark which affects all
mankind
it clearly cannot be an actual physical one. It is symbolic. Thus It
represents man in his mortal state and without the atonement of Jesus
Christ, who truly cannot buy or sell without the mark of Satan (see
Rev.
13:16-18; 14:1, 9-11; 17:5).

Gary: I fail to see your hard evidence that it is solely symbolic.
Combining scriptural quotes from the BoM with Revelation does not mean
you have proved your point.  Members of the Church are marked both
physically and symbolically with garments. Would you suggest that the
garments aren't real? People are marked all the time by machines, and are
tracked every time they use a credit card (held in the hand). I
personally believe the physical mark is a special economic bank code that
will be used to prevent fraud. The EU is growing quickly, with reluctant
nations being forced into the economy if they wish to trade freely with
the other nations of Europe. As John the Revelator sees all mankind
getting the mark, he may be exaggerating the extent of the physical mark,
in order to show the widespread symbolic mark being used.

Steven:
It is also significant to note in Rev. 14:9-11, that those who thus
follow
Satan and receive his mark on their forehead or hand, suffer the wrath
of
God, are tormented with fire and brimstone, and the smoke of their
torment ascendeth up for ever and ever--quite a punishment just for
accepting a mark for food, as the christian fundamentalists believe,
especially if one did so without knowledge or innocently! Reading these
scriptures in context just doesn't bear this viewpoint up. It should be
obvious that the punishment mentioned

Re: [ZION] Redelfs' International Odyssey Report

2002-11-26 Thread Steven Montgomery
I am thrilled that you had such a good times with such good people.

--
Steven Montgomery

At 04:29 PM 11/25/2002, you wrote:

Greetings from the wild man of the north.  I want to give a brief account 
of my adventures in Utah, Alberta and British Columbia.  A full report 
will have to be filed later because of health considerations.

deleted, for brevity

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




RE: [ZION] Toiletese (was Coffee, Tea, or Eternity)

2002-11-29 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 09:58 PM 11/28/2002, you wrote:

Gary Smith:

A sage plumber I once visited at his throne on a high pile,
er, mountain of, er, uh, well anyway he told me that there
are two secrets to plumbing:

The good water comes up, and the dirty water goes down
the hole.

___

Did he say what to do if the steel wool scouring pad goes
down the toilet first and gets stuck?  (I didn't do it.)

If he didn't, does anyone else have any ideas.  I haven't
been able to snake it out yet, and I'm not sure any of
those chemicals (like Drano) will work on steel wool.

It has two toilets, two sinks, and a bathtub clogged right
now.  Fortunately, we have one other set of plumbing that
drains past wherever the clog is, but I'm afraid we are
going to push it to a point where everything backs up.

What a wonderful weekend for company.

The turkey was good, though.  Calmed everyone right down.

Larry Jackson


Larry,

Sounds like the best bet (assuming the steel wool is in fact still stuck in 
the toilet and not further down the drain pipe) is to take the toilet 
completely off (make sure before you do that you have one of those wax 
rings). Once you have the toilet disconnected from everything take it 
outside on your lawn, turn the toilet upside down and snake your garden 
hose down through the opening (works best the higher pressure hose you can 
get) and turn the water on full. It shouldn't take more than a few minutes 
of working with it to get the steel wool to at least get to a point where 
you can pull it out by hand. I've dislodged many a toy and various other 
paraphernalia using this method grin.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Recall the new star that announced the birth at Bethlehem? It was in its 
precise orbit long before it so shone. We are likewise placed in human 
orbits to illuminate. Divine correlation functions not only in the cosmos 
but on this planet, too. After all, the Book of Mormon plates were not 
buried in Belgium, only to have Joseph Smith born centuries later in 
distant Bombay. (Elder Neal A. Maxwell, Conference Report, Saturday 
Morning, Oct 2002)

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Celestial show

2002-11-29 Thread Steven Montgomery
Cool. 7 seconds is a long time for a meteor to streak across the sky. Must 
have been spectacular.

--
Steven Montgomery

At 06:04 PM 11/29/2002, you wrote:
Yesterday morning (28/11) my wife was up early and saw the meteor of her
life. A very bright greenish-white fireball that lasted for 7 seconds
streaked from east to west across the southern sky. Local scientists
think it hit the surface near Drayton Valley, some 50 km SW of us.

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he
will pick himself up and continue on ­ Winston Churchill

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the
author solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the
author's employer, nor those of any organization with which the author
may be associated.

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/



//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===




Re: [ZION] Are any of you having problems?

2002-12-09 Thread Steven Montgomery
The only problem I have right now is lack of time. Seems as if my life has 
suddenly become extremely busy. ;-)

--
Steven Montgomery

At 07:41 PM 12/8/2002, you wrote:
I think it's just been quiet. Everyone's still digesting turkey and cranberry
sauce.

John W. Redelfs wrote:

 I haven't received any mail from the list in two days.  I didn't notice
 this until just now because other family members have been taking their
 turns at the computer.  The Topica people say there is no problem at their
 end.  Is it possible that ATT Worldnet is screening out my Topica
 mail?  Or has the list just been remarkably quiet for the last couple 
of days?

 John W. Redelfs[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 =
 To me, clowns aren't funny.  In fact, they're kind of scary.
 I've wondered where this started and I think it goes back to
 the time I went to the circus, and a clown killed my dad.
 --Jack Handy
 =
 All my opinions are tentative pending further data. --JWR

 
//
 ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
 ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
 
/


--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he 
will pick
himself up and continue on ­ Winston Churchill

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author's 
employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/


//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===




[ZION] NOMA: A Contrarian view

2002-12-13 Thread Steven Montgomery
Not to pick on Marc grin, but here is a differing viewpoint from an LDS 
scientist regarding the roles of science and religion (or NOMA, as Marc if 
fond of using). I don't have time to comment now (I've been both very sick 
a very nasty form of influenza and busy):

http://www.meridianmagazine.com/sci_rel/021211war.html


--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Recall the new star that announced the birth at Bethlehem? It was in its 
precise orbit long before it so shone. We are likewise placed in human 
orbits to illuminate. Divine correlation functions not only in the cosmos 
but on this planet, too. After all, the Book of Mormon plates were not 
buried in Belgium, only to have Joseph Smith born centuries later in 
distant Bombay. (Elder Neal A. Maxwell, Conference Report, Saturday 
Morning, Oct 2002)

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



[ZION] Church News Article

2002-12-20 Thread Steven Montgomery
Hi guys (and gals),

I've been very busy of late, way behind on my email, but thought I would 
mention that my step-son, Eric was mentioned in a Church News Article of 
Dec. 14, 2002. Eric, for those who may not know, was a recipient of a Make 
A Wish gift, a very large log playhouse/doghouse. Most of the labor 
involved was performed by the deacons of a local Cedar City ward. Eric was 
really excited and it was good for all of those involved.


--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Recall the new star that announced the birth at Bethlehem? It was in its 
precise orbit long before it so shone. We are likewise placed in human 
orbits to illuminate. Divine correlation functions not only in the cosmos 
but on this planet, too. After all, the Book of Mormon plates were not 
buried in Belgium, only to have Joseph Smith born centuries later in 
distant Bombay. (Elder Neal A. Maxwell, Conference Report, Saturday 
Morning, Oct 2002)

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



[ZION] test

2002-12-20 Thread Steven Montgomery
Test


--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Recall the new star that announced the birth at Bethlehem? It was in its 
precise orbit long before it so shone. We are likewise placed in human 
orbits to illuminate. Divine correlation functions not only in the cosmos 
but on this planet, too. After all, the Book of Mormon plates were not 
buried in Belgium, only to have Joseph Smith born centuries later in 
distant Bombay. (Elder Neal A. Maxwell, Conference Report, Saturday 
Morning, Oct 2002)

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Constitutional Losses

2003-05-27 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 08:19 PM 5/27/2003, you wrote:
It makes me wonder, can it really be long before the Elders of the Church 
have to save the constitution?

Scott
. . . if it can be saved at all.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 . . . today the Christian Constitutionalist weeps as he walks about his
country. He sees the spiritual and political faith of his fathers
betrayed, by wolves in sheep's garments. He sees the forces of evil
increasing in strength and momentum under the leadership of Satan, the
archenemy of freedom.  ---Ezra Taft Benson, Conference Report, April 1967.
//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
==^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^



Re: [ZION] Constitutional Losses

2003-05-27 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 09:32 PM 5/27/2003, you wrote:
Doesn't prophesy say that the Elders will save it?

Jon
There are different versions and remembrances of Joseph Smith's statement 
(Given on July 19th 1840). Orson Hyde, in recalling Joseph Smith's words, 
put it this way:

I believe he said something like this--that the time would come when the 
Constitution and the country would be in danger of overthrow; and said he: 
'If the Constitution be saved at all, it will be by the Elders of this 
Church.' I believe this is about the language, an nearly as I can recollect 
it. (See JD 6: 152)

If Hyde's version is correct then this makes the prophecy conditional. 
However, to be fair, President Ezra Taft Benson liked the version recorded 
by Martha Jane Knowleton, which is more explicit that the Constitution will 
be saved. Knowleton's version is this:

Even this nation will be on the very verge of crumbling to pieces and 
tumbling to the ground; and when the Constitution is upon the brink of 
ruin, this people will be the staff upon which the nation shall lean; and 
they shall bear the constitution away from the very verge of destruction. 

I say, how can the Constitution be saved by the Elders of Israel when many 
of them don't even know its basic precepts? For instance, how many Elders 
know the reason the Founders setup the Electoral College the way they did? 
Or the reason that originally, before the 17th amendment, that Senators 
were elected by State legislatures?

--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is no accident, then, that so many who gathered at Philadelphia to 
declare independence and a decade later to draft a constitution were men 
who had apprenticed themselves to Thucydides, Plato, Aristotle, Polybius, 
and Cicero, and who could debate at length on the various constitutional 
forms of the classical world before they chose one for the new American 
nation.  We owe our very existence as a people in great part to classical 
learning.T. L. Simmons

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
==^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^



RE: [ZION] Constitutional Losses

2003-05-29 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 08:54 AM 5/28/2003, you wrote:

Stacy Smith:

I have most of the writings of Joseph Smith.  I'm going to
hunt up what was said.
___

I think someone already posted the two best quotes I have ever
heard on the subject.
The problem, as I see it, is that if the elders are going to
save the constitution as it hangs by a thread (or however it
was really put), the correlation committee is going to have
to put a lesson in the priesthood manual about the constitution
if very many of them are going to know what it is we are even
talking about.
Larry Jackson
A good primer might be President Ezra Taft Benson's talk entitled, The 
Constitution: A Heavenly Banner, which can be read here:

http://www.geocities.com/graymada/tcahb.html



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
. . .  in the future the opposition from Satan will be both more subtle 
and more open. While in some ways it may be more blatant, it will be masked 
with greater sophistication and cunning. We will need greater spirituality 
to perceive all the forms of evil and greater strength to resist it. 
(President James E. Faust, CR, April 2003)

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
==^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^



Re: [ZION] Constitutional Losses

2003-05-29 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 10:37 AM 5/28/2003, you wrote:
Steven - even in Knowlton's quote it does not say the nation would be saved,
only that the constitution will be borne away from destruction.  This may
very well be separate from the entity known as the United States.  It is
unlikely, for example, that the city of Zion in the Mississippi valley will
be established without some prior upheaval in the nation - simply based on
the eventual size of the city.
I have not heard from you on our other topic for some time - are we through
with that?
George
Correct. It does not say the nation would be saved. I believe I made it 
clear that the saving references were strictly to those in reference to 
the United States Constitution--or at least the principles contained therein.

Regarding our other topic. I thought I had responded and was waiting for 
a further response back from you. But, I've been so busy the last few weeks 
that I might have missed it.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The overall performance of the college graduates in the Convention of 1787 
speaks forcefully for the proposition that Latin, rhetoric, philosophy, and 
mathematics can be a healthy fare for political heroes.Clinton Rossiter

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
==^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^



[ZION] Test

2003-06-01 Thread Steven Montgomery
Test. (My email has been bouncing. This is a test to see if the problems 
have been resolved)

--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
==^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^



RE: [ZION] Test

2003-06-01 Thread Steven Montgomery
Well, any landing you can walk away from is a good one.

--
Steven Montgomery
At 09:14 AM 5/31/2003, you wrote:

No bounce at this end.  You message landed with a
solid thud.  But, not to waste a perfectly good email:
Many years ago at an international airport, I was in an
airplane behind a British Airways airliner.  We were both
waiting for an airliner from another country to land before
we were to depart.
The other plane came in, hit solidly on the painted numbers
at the end of the runway, and bounced several feet back up
into the air.  The second time he hit the runway it was nearly
as hard, and he bounced again.  The third time, with some
wing wobbling, the plane finally settled down and the pilot
slowed to safely taxi off the runway.
Before the tower could clear the next plane for takeoff,
a distinctly British voice came on the air and said,
Well, that's one way of doing it.
Regards,

Larry Jackson
//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
==^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^



[ZION] Mouth of the Righteous

2003-06-10 Thread Steven Montgomery
Folks,

Something to consider when making our posts:

11  The mouth of a righteous man is a well of life: but violence covereth 
the mouth of the wicked.
12  Hatred stirreth up strifes: but love covereth all sins.

(Old Testament | Proverbs 10:11 - 12)

Can't we discuss our various positions with arguments of substance and 
simply ignore insults, verbal assaults and slander?

--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is no accident, then, that so many who gathered at Philadelphia to 
declare independence and a decade later to draft a constitution were men 
who had apprenticed themselves to Thucydides, Plato, Aristotle, Polybius, 
and Cicero, and who could debate at length on the various constitutional 
forms of the classical world before they chose one for the new American 
nation.  We owe our very existence as a people in great part to classical 
learning.T. L. Simmons

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
==^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^



Re: [ZION] Goodbye

2003-06-11 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 09:35 AM 6/11/2003, Terrance wrote:

As I ponder my thoughts and feelings out loud here, I suppose what I'm 
looking for can't be found, at least not from within an internet 
discussion group.  If I don't feel genuinely greeted or warmly welcomed by 
fellow church members in a different ward, how can I expect to get this 
feeling and interaction from letters and words on a computer screen?
My remarks are not directed against you specifically, but I suspect that 
what we garner from Internet lists in the way of further enlightenment, 
knowledge, genuineness, or warmth will be close to the effort we put into 
them.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The overall performance of the college graduates in the Convention of 1787 
speaks forcefully for the proposition that Latin, rhetoric, philosophy, and 
mathematics can be a healthy fare for political heroes.Clinton Rossiter

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
==^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^



Re: [ZION] Lies about Iraqi museum just tip of iceberg

2003-06-15 Thread Steven Montgomery



 It took only 48 hours for the museum to be destroyed, with at least
170,000 artifacts carried away by looters.
  — New York Times, April 13
You'd have to go back centuries, to the Mongol invasion of Baghdad in
1258, to find looting on this scale.
  — British archaeologist Eleanor Robson, New York Times, April 16
  WASHINGTON — Well, not really. Turns out the Iraqi National Museum
lost not 170,000 treasures but 33. Baghdad Bob was more accurate.
The New York Times has had a credibility problem for years. This particular 
news item is only the tip of the iceberg. Walter Duranty was one of the 
worst lie-mongers at the Times. Right now there is a real effort by several 
Ukrainian-American groups to revoke his Pulitzer prize for lying about 
Stalin's man-made famine (claiming there wasn't one when he clearly from 
the evidence knew there was), in the Ukraine which killed at least 10 
million Kulaks. Other errors made by the Times was that Fidel Castro was 
the George Washington of Cuba and not a communist, and that Mao was merely 
an agrarian reformer and not the committed Marxist-Leninist that he was.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper . . The real 
extent of this state of misinformation is known only to those who are in a 
situation to confront facts within their knowledge with the lies of the 
day. I really look with commiseration over the great body of my fellow 
citizens, who reading newspapers, live and die in the belief, that they 
have known something of what has been passing in the world in their time . 
. . General facts may indeed be collected from them, such as that Europe is 
now at war . . . but no details can be relied on. (Thomas Jefferson, Letter 
to John Norvell, June 11, 1807)

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
==^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^



Re: [ZION] Goodbye

2003-06-15 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 10:16 AM 6/14/2003, Scott wrote:

Like Gary, I have thought of leaving the list. The major reason I have not 
is that there continue to be a number of good friends (like Gary, also 
JWR, ELF, Grandpa Bill, and many others) who post occasional notes. I 
enjoy this association with them, even though it is often hidden among the 
other posts. I would probably have already left the list if volume weren't 
so much lower than I can afford to wade through the rubbish looking for my 
friends.
What? I was not included in your list of good friends grin?

My suggestion--start such a list of friends. Perhaps you can name it the 
ZION-FRIENDS list. I would certainly enjoy such a list but then you may not 
like my association.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The overall performance of the college graduates in the Convention of 1787 
speaks forcefully for the proposition that Latin, rhetoric, philosophy, and 
mathematics can be a healthy fare for political heroes.Clinton Rossiter

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
==^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^



RE: [ZION] Lies about Iraqi museum just tip of iceberg

2003-06-17 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 10:32 PM 6/16/2003, Jim wrote:

Steven,

I suppose the problem is not newspapers, but those who read them.

If the vast majority of people were not prepared to believe at first
glance everything fed to them by the news media, journalists with an
agenda would be wholly frustrated in their attempts to lead public
opinion.
How many saw the news reports about looting in Iraq, and immediately
believed the stories?  Why are we so gullible and naive?
Same reason that Utah is the fraud capital of the United States?



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is no accident, then, that so many who gathered at Philadelphia to 
declare independence and a decade later to draft a constitution were men 
who had apprenticed themselves to Thucydides, Plato, Aristotle, Polybius, 
and Cicero, and who could debate at length on the various constitutional 
forms of the classical world before they chose one for the new American 
nation.  We owe our very existence as a people in great part to classical 
learning.T. L. Simmons

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
==^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^



[ZION] John Birch Society in Utah

2003-06-17 Thread Steven Montgomery
 to the 
dangers of a potential police state at home while a global government is 
being built abroad.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is one and only one legitimate goal of United States foreign policy. 
It is a narrow goal, a nationalistic goal: the preservation of our national 
independence. Nothing in the Constitution grants that the president shall 
have the privilege of offering himself as a world leader. He is our 
executive; he is on our payroll; he is supposed to put our best interests 
in front of those of other nations. Nothing in the Constitution nor in 
logic grants to the president of the United States or to Congress the power 
to influence the political life of other countries, to 'uplift' their 
cultures, to bolster their economies, to feed their people, or even to 
defend them against their enemies. (The Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson, p. 
614; see also pp. 682  704.)

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
==^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^



Re: [ZION] Doing Lunch

2003-06-18 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 11:46 AM 6/18/2003, you wrote:
I am in the SLC-Provo-Orem area for the next several days.  If anyone
would like to get together for lunch or something similar, give me a
call at 907-465-2505.  If I'm not there, leave a message and I'll call
you back.  I'm probably leaving the area on Monday, but that is not
certain.
Your friend and brother,
John W. Redelfs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't you mean 801-465-2505? ;-)



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is one and only one legitimate goal of United States foreign policy. 
It is a narrow goal, a nationalistic goal: the preservation of our national 
independence. Nothing in the Constitution grants that the president shall 
have the privilege of offering himself as a world leader. He is our 
executive; he is on our payroll; he is supposed to put our best interests 
in front of those of other nations. Nothing in the Constitution nor in 
logic grants to the president of the United States or to Congress the power 
to influence the political life of other countries, to 'uplift' their 
cultures, to bolster their economies, to feed their people, or even to 
defend them against their enemies. (The Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson, p. 
614; see also pp. 682  704.)

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
==^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^



RE: [ZION] Danites

2003-06-18 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 11:20 AM 6/18/2003, you wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Who can educate me on the Danites in the late 1830's and later?
Have you checked the Encyclopedia of Mormonism?  I don't know much about
them except what I read in Harold Shindler's ORRIN PORTER ROCKWELL: SON
OF THUNDER over 30 years ago.
An excellent book, that I also read about 30 years ago.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The United States goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy. She
is a well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the
champion and vindicator only of her own. If the United States took up
all foreign affairs, it would become entangled in all the wars of
interest and intrigue, which assume the colors and usurp the standard of
freedom. She might become the dictatress of the world. She would be no
longer the ruler of her own soul. --President John Quincy Adams 

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
==^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^



[ZION] Weapons of Mass Delusion

2003-06-18 Thread Steven Montgomery
 it a unique 
threat to the world.

— President George W. Bush
message to the Iraqi people, April 10, 2003
We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological 
laboratories [W]e've so far discovered two. And we'll find more weapons 
as time goes on. But for those who say we haven't found the banned 
manufacturing devices or banned weapons, they're wrong, we found them.

— President George W. Bush
in remarks on Polish television, May 30, 2003
as quoted by the Associated Press the following day
(The two suspected mobile biological laboratories Mr. Bush was referring to 
do not constitute arms. In fact, according to a June 5th Associated Press 
report: Neither trailer had any biological agent inside, nor showed any 
signs that they had been used to produce biological weapons. — Editor)

Question: Is U.S. credibility on the line over weapons of mass destruction 
in Iraq?

Answer: I'm not exactly sure what that means. I mean, Iraq had a weapons 
program. Intelligence throughout the decade showed they had a weapons 
program. I am absolutely convinced with time we'll find out that they did 
have a weapons program.

— President George W. Bush
remarks during a photo-op, June 9, 2003
Will WMDs be found?

Huge stockpiles of WMDs were supposed to be found, and some may still be 
found. Yet, after many weeks of searching, it seems clear that the Iraqi 
threat was nowhere near what the administration had claimed. — Editor

There is no doubt that the regime of Saddam Hussein possesses weapons of 
mass destruction. And … as this operation continues, those weapons will be 
identified, found, along with the people who have produced them and who 
guard them.

— General Tommy Franks
commander of the U.S. Central Command
media briefing, Doha, Qatar, March 22, 2003
[T]he area … that coalition forces control … happens not to be the area 
where weapons of mass destruction were dispersed. We know where they are. 
They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and 
north somewhat.

— Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld,
on ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos
on March 30, 2003, when coalition forces
had occupied much of, but not all of, Iraq
[W]e never believed that we'd just tumble over weapons of mass destruction 
in that country [Iraq] We're going to find what we find as a result of 
talking to people, I believe, not simply by going to some site and hoping 
to discover it.

— Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld
Fox News Sunday, May 4, 2003
Now what happened? Why weren't they [WMDs] used? I don't know. There are 
several possible reasons for that [I]t may very well be that they 
didn't have time to … use chemical weapons. It is also possible that they 
decided that they would destroy them prior to a conflict.

— Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld
remarks to the Council on Foreign Relations, May 27, 2003
It was a surprise to me then, it remains a surprise to me now, that we 
have not uncovered weapons … in some of the forward dispersal sites. Again, 
believe me, it's not for lack of trying. We've been to virtually every 
ammunition supply point between the Kuwaiti border and Baghdad, but they're 
simply not there We were simply wrong.

— Lt. General James Conway
commander of the First Marine Expeditionary Force
press conference May 30, 2003
Why were WMDs the central issue?

The truth is that for reasons that have a lot to do with the U.S. 
government bureaucracy we settled on the one issue that everyone could 
agree on which was weapons of mass destruction as the core reason

— Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz
May 10, 2003 interview with Vanity Fair
based on the Defense Department transcript
Should we have gone to war against Iraq? If the war was necessary to defend 
the U.S. and its citizens, and if that case were made and presented to 
Congress, and if Congress approved the constitutionally required 
declaration of war — then the answer would be yes. But that is not what 
happened.

Instead, the Bush administration used the U.S. military to enforce UN 
Security Council resolutions even more vigorously than the UN Security 
Council apparently wanted them enforced. Those resolutions had nothing to 
do with the September 11th terrorist attack or defending the United States. 
The irony is that the administration's failure to find the alleged huge 
stockpiles of WMDs, and to end the ongoing turmoil in Iraq and bring home 
the troops, can only serve to justify having the UN take over.

--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is one and only one legitimate goal of United States foreign policy. 
It is a narrow goal, a nationalistic goal: the preservation of our national 
independence. Nothing in the Constitution grants that the president shall 
have the privilege of offering himself as a world leader. He is our 
executive; he is on our payroll; he is supposed to put our best interests 
in front of those of other nations. Nothing in the Constitution nor in 
logic

RE: [ZION] Doing Lunch

2003-06-19 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 03:43 PM 6/19/2003, you wrote:

Steven Montgomery wrote:

 At 11:46 AM 6/18/2003, you wrote:
 I am in the SLC-Provo-Orem area for the next several days.  If anyone
 would like to get together for lunch or something similar, give me a
 call at 907-465-2505.  If I'm not there, leave a message and I'll call
 you back.  I'm probably leaving the area on Monday, but that is not
 certain.
 
 Your friend and brother,
 John W. Redelfs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Don't you mean 801-465-2505? ;-)
Yes, that is what I meant. slapping forhead  --JWR
See Ronn,

I told you so. ;-)

I'm just hoping that JWR doesn't get oldtimer's disease and forget to visit 
me.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Editor, The Constitutional Broadside Newsletter
http://www.thecbn.net
//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
==^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^



Re: [ZION] Doing Lunch

2003-06-19 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 01:08 PM 6/19/2003, you wrote:
At 12:16 PM 6/18/03 -0600, Steven Montgomery wrote:
At 11:46 AM 6/18/2003, you wrote:
I am in the SLC-Provo-Orem area for the next several days.  If anyone
would like to get together for lunch or something similar, give me a
call at 907-465-2505.  If I'm not there, leave a message and I'll call
you back.  I'm probably leaving the area on Monday, but that is not
certain.
Your friend and brother,
John W. Redelfs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't you mean 801-465-2505? ;-)


Perhaps that's his cell phone.



-- Ronn! :)
No, it's his number he gave me to use to call him while he is in Utah 
County. I think he just got in a hurry, forgot, and put AK's area code in 
by mistake.

John W. Redelf's, bless his heart, on Sunday morning is traveling about 180 
miles out of his way just to come visit me down here in Enoch (5 miles 
north of Cedar City) Utah. If everything goes as planned, he will meet me 
for Sacrament meeting (9AM) and after Church spend a few hours shooting the 
breeze. I look forward to it. The only other person I've met from my 
on-line activities is Doug Schell.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A popular government without popular information or the means of acquiring 
it, is but a prologue to a farce or a tragedy, or perhaps both. Knowledge 
will forever govern ignorance, and a people who mean to be their own 
governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives. --John Adams

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
==^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^



RE: [ZION] hand shakes

2003-06-21 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 10:40 AM 6/20/2003, you wrote:

It seems to me that the tradition of hand shaking is diminishing somewhat 
in LSD social circles, the ones I'm in, that is. And for that, I'm quite 
glad. I don't want to shake hands with anyone, quite frankly. It's just a 
germy thing to do and it should be discontinued, in my noble opinion.

Think about it; handshaking spreads germs, disease, and simply more pain 
to make our already miserable earth lives more miserable. So why shake 
hands with germy people? They put their fingers in their noses, cracks 
(various ones), and rub there oily skin. I simply can't stand it when I 
see people in church rubbing their faces, yes, and mouths--then they want 
to shake hands with me?? God forbid.

Does anyone feel like me? I feel my complaints are noteworthy.It's a good 
idea to wash you hands after shaking. Wouldn't you say?

Paul O
You ought to be even more grateful then that  the mid-eastern tradition of 
greeting is not followed then.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
==^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^



Re: [ZION] hand shakes

2003-06-21 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 10:48 AM 6/21/2003, you wrote:

On Sat, 21 Jun 2003 10:06:02 -0600 Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 You ought to be even more grateful then that  the mid-eastern
 tradition of
 greeting is not followed then.
Why? What do they do?

Paul O
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Holy (Or, I suppose unholy, depending on who is performing the action) 
Kiss: Luke 22: 47-48, and then Romans 16:16, 1 Cor. 16: 20, 2 Cor. 13: 12, 
1 Thess. 5: 26, and finally 1 Peter 5: 14.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The overall performance of the college graduates in the Convention of 1787 
speaks forcefully for the proposition that Latin, rhetoric, philosophy, and 
mathematics can be a healthy fare for political heroes.Clinton Rossiter

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
==^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^



Re: [ZION] hand shakes

2003-06-24 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 08:14 AM 6/24/2003, you wrote:

On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 08:17:00 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Oh, I don't know, Paul.  I'm pretty particular, I suppose, but I just
 don't
 worry about making hand contact with the temple workers.  Especially
 when
 it pertains to performing ordinances, I just feel like the Lord
 will
 protect us.  And actually, the Lord is in charge; He is the one who
 has
 said how the ordinances are to be performed.  It is just my
 personal
 feeling that when we are in the temple, we are where we are supposed
 to be
 and everything will be alright.  I just don't worry about it there.

 Naturally, I wash my hands as per my usual practice (like after
 using the
 restroom and before eating) but beyond that, I just don't worry
 about it in
 the temple.

 But that's me...
 Heidi the fair
I understand your faith in this thing, Heidi. But-- I don't necessarily
think the Lord will protect us just because we are doing work in the
temple. We LDS people are always getting sick just as other people do. It
seems the Lord doesn't stop this from happening but actually deems that
we get sick-- you know-- those wonderful little trials that we get stuck
with? I want to avoid those trials if I can.
It isn't the temple workers hands that I am so concerned with but all the
hands he has been shaking. Germs get carried that way. It's just not
sanitary if you ask me. Something should be done about it.
Paul O
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Such paranoia didn't do Howard Hughes any good. I'm beginning to think that 
perhaps people should be exposed to as many germs as possible, starting 
with early childhood. That way the body can build up its immune system and 
develop resistance to as many germs and viruses as possible. For example, I 
exposed my children to chickenpox when they were young (and at the best age 
to handle such a disease, as opposed to when they are middle aged or older 
and have more severe complications) and they have never had any problems 
since.

I remember reading an article in one scientific journal, which had what 
appeared to be some evidence for its thesis, that one of the reasons 
western culture and civilization developed and persevered was due to the 
fact that that particular stock of people had more immunity built up than 
other races or peoples.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
==^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^



Re: [ZION] Dead List

2003-07-11 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 09:07 AM 7/11/2003, JWR wrote, regarding the book by Jon Krakauer 
called, _Under the Banner of Heaven: A Story of Violent Faith:


 I doubt if I will buy the book, but apparently a great many others 
will.  It isn't going to do our missionary work any good.
I don't know John. I find that when the Devil and all his minions rage 
against righteousness that rather than hurt, it actually attracts the 
honest in heart to the gospel.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Editor, The Constitutional Broadside Newsletter
http://www.thecbn.net
//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
==^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^



Re: [ZION] Samoa Temple

2003-07-12 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 10:44 AM 7/12/2003, Paul wrote:

John,

President Bensen is dead. What he said has no bearing anymore regarding
the direction and present condition of the Church, let alone the future
direction. This responsibility lies upon the shoulders of the current
leadership.
If the Church is still under condemnation for not reading the Book of
Mormon, the Lord will tell us through his prophet. Otherwise, we are
collectively in the clear.
Paul O
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't agree. The Lord, who trumps all the prophets of God, past, present 
and future, first gave this revelation in 1832. Since that time Joseph 
Smith, who was the instrument through which the revelation came is dead and 
so is every other prophet except our current living prophet. Since Joseph 
Smith is dead, are we to believe that this revelation is no longer binding? 
I don't agree with your logic. President Benson said the condemnation was 
still in effect. I believe him. Just because President Benson is dead and 
no longer around does not mean the curse is dead. Silence from our current 
Prophet does not necessarily mean the curse is no longer in effect.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The overall performance of the college graduates in the Convention of 1787 
speaks forcefully for the proposition that Latin, rhetoric, philosophy, and 
mathematics can be a healthy fare for political heroes.Clinton Rossiter

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
==^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^



Re: Sherlock Holmes anti-Mormon novel (was Re: [ZION] Dead List)

2003-07-15 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 01:11 PM 7/11/2003, Mark Gregson wrote:

 IIRC one of the very early (perhaps the first) Sherlock Holmes
 novels had a very anti storyline. Anyone out there who can either
 confirm or refute?
Yep, and I've read the novel.  A Study in Scarlet (1887).  The 
anti-Mormon stuff is not the focus of the book but prominence is given to 
the notion of avenging angels i.e. members who kill selected gentiles 
and apostates (cf. our earlier discussion about Danites).  Arthur Conan 
Doyle was merely reflecting current beliefs about the Church.

This website, http://www.jesusjournal.com/articles/publish/article_110.html
wants its readers to know that we are just as dangerous as we were in 
those scarlet times.  Sensationalism and gullibility are still best sellers.

=  Mark Gregson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  =
Hmmm. Somehow, even though I love books and am a voracious reader, Sir (he 
was knighted for his literary achievements some time after his first novel) 
Arthur Conan Doyle's works managed to  escape my attention. So, with my 
curiosity thoroughly piqued  I attempted to rectify that gap (at least 
partially) and read, _A Study In Scarlet: Being a Reprint from the 
Reminiscences of John H. Watson , M.D. , Late of the Army Medical 
Department_.  An electronic text version is available here:

http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-new2?id=DoyScar.sgmimages=images/modengdata=/texts/english/modeng/parsedtag=publicpart=all

In spite of its obvious antagonism against Brigham Young, polygamy and the 
Mormons, I greatly loved this novel.  A delightfully easy read (it is 
apparently geared towards young readers, whatever that may be) but with 
enough intellectual stimulation to keep it interesting.

I have to confess though that my interest waned somewhat when the story 
shifted from London to the Great Basin and Salt Lake City.  Even though 
Doyle used a common literary technique similar to the flashback, I found 
myself wishing that Doyle had used a more fluid method to connect the 
reader from the events in London to the events in the Great Basin.

At any rate, my interest again picked up and I enjoyed the rest of the 
story. I can see why Doyle's works became so popular. He has a way of 
writing which keeps your interest.

As for Doyle's anti-Mormonism, apparently Doyle apologized in later years 
for his obvious errors. Levi Edgar Young claimed that Doyle had apologized 
and that he had been misled by writings of the time about the Church. An 
interesting article about Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, his work, _A Study In 
Scarlet, and his apologetic attitude towards the Church  can be found here:

http://www.adherents.com/lit/article_Doyle.html



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The overall performance of the college graduates in the Convention of 1787 
speaks forcefully for the proposition that Latin, rhetoric, philosophy, and 
mathematics can be a healthy fare for political heroes.Clinton Rossiter

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
==^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^



[ZION] LDS Pundit

2003-07-15 Thread Steven Montgomery
At least this political pundit is not afraid to quote Latter-day Scripture:

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/7/13/173633.shtml

--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A popular government without popular information or the means of acquiring 
it, is but a prologue to a farce or a tragedy, or perhaps both. Knowledge 
will forever govern ignorance, and a people who mean to be their own 
governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives. --John Adams

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/
==^
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^



  1   2   3   >