Dick Davies wrote:
Ah, that's really interesting ( a bigger deal than ZFS root boot for me).
Does Nevada LU support it yet? Or does anyone know when it will?
As far as I'm aware it's integrated into nevada ( I will check this out and
find out build
), and it will be going into s10 update 6.
Krzys wrote:
Is there way to convert sparse solaris zone to whole root zone? if yes what
or
how could I do that? Is it even possible to do so?
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi
No it's not possible, currently you'd
Sanjay Akula wrote:
Did anybody saw this WARNING messages while loading patch cluster what
does it means.
Installing 120011-14...
/kernel/drv/sparcv9/fcp: undefined symbol 'fc_ulp_hold_remote_port'
WARNING: mod_load: cannot load module 'fcp'
WARNING: fctl: ULP FCSM version mismatch;
31, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Enda O'Connor ( Sun Micro Systems
Ireland) [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Crambit Team wrote:
Hi all,
I need to move two zones to a 2 different systems as global zone.
In one
of them I have Oracle.
My questions
Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Crambit Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Enda,
the Solaris release is 8/07.
What I really need is move the zone (doing like an ufsdump) and let it
becaming a global zone and not a zone in a another system.
This is because we didn't have a
Morris Hooten wrote:
I've crated many zones but haven't seen this one yet and have tried
a few things and can't get it past this point in installing the new zone.
it just hangs at the point below
any hinsts? i looked in sunsolve but nothing specific
thanks
Creating list of
Mangan wrote:
Is this a release that can be downloaded from the website and will work on
SPARC systems. The write up says it is for VMware. Am I missing something?
Use Solaris 10 9/07. It has more than a year's worth of improvements
and enhancements to Solaris.
-- richard
Richard Elling wrote:
Morris Hooten wrote:
I looked through the solarsinternals zfs best practices and not
completly sure
of the best scenario.
ok, perhaps we should add some clarifications...
I have a Solaris 10 6/06 Generic_125100-10 box with attached 3510 array
and would like to
numbers, 9.07 was what
Richard meant.
Enda
When is the next release for Sparc due out?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Enda O'Connor ( Sun Micro Systems Ireland) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dec 21, 2007 9:15 AM
To: Richard Elling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], zones-discuss
Mangan wrote:
I installed the 10_recommended patchset on a machine that had a running zone.
The host machine and the running zone appear to be ok but when I try to
install an additional zone the new zone gets created but it won't go through
the sys config routine and you can't change the
Andrew Black wrote:
When I first create a zone, it normally asks you some questions such as the
time zone and whether you want NIS etc.
- is there any way of autmating this so you always get the same answer
- today I created a zone and it didnt ask me these questions. I wasnt
aware of
Bryan Allen wrote:
On Nov 6, 2007, at 8:18 AM, Nicolas Dorfsman wrote:
Hi all,
Is there anyone here working on something able to create/configure/
boot a zone without interactivity ? I tried to update
create_zone.sh but it's a little bit hard to maintain it in shell.
So, an
Damien Carbery wrote:
are you piping /dev/null to STDIn in the commands, I
can see you did
that on the commands line, but not clear if you did
it in the script or not.
For every command in the script?
The script is:
http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/jds/spec-files/trunk/cron-script.sh
Ihsan Zaghmouth wrote:
Here's one issue that was raised by a Sun customer ... Looks like we
have a clash of ineterst on ~.
They have v490s with RSC cards (Remote System Control) and Zones.
When they do *console -C zone* , then do a *~.* to disconnect from
that zones console, it takes
to access extended functions and to disconnect from the login.
*The default escape character is the tilde (~).*
as both use tilde, you need the double ~~. ie escape the tilde itself as
I suggested ( try it and it should work )
Enda
Enda O'Connor ( Sun Micro Systems Ireland) wrote
Jerry Kemp wrote:
I have a Sun T2000 running Solaris 10u2, all UFS file systems that has
been in place for several months. This morning during a reboot, I had a
zone that would not come back up. It failed to boot due to an inability
to mount /svc with an error of failed with exit code 32.
Hi
your sparse zone's zonepath in in /usr and it inherits /usr as well.
In our testing pkgadd calls getcwd in
/dev/.SUNW_patches_0909107281-1123512-01035723188c/120011-14 inside
the zone, which instead of returning /dev/.SUNW.. as the absolute
path returns the absolute path
Bangalore, Suresh wrote:
Hi Gurus
We have a non-global zone which is currently configured, installed and
running.
Now Customer wants to add /dev/ttyp* to the non-global zone.
Tried adding to the zonecfg using adding
device
match: /dev/ttyp*
and then rebooted the zone.
Richard Weatherley wrote:
Hi Enda
What is the ETA for 119255 ( -42) that addresses the problems with deferred
activation patching for ZFS and VxFS when trying to install 120012-14?
Thanks.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Enda O'Connor ( Sun Micro Systems Ireland) wrote:
Richard Weatherley wrote:
Hi Enda
What is the ETA for 119255 ( -42) that addresses the problems with deferred
activation patching for ZFS and VxFS when trying to install 120012-14?
Thanks.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Dan Price wrote:
On Tue 02 Oct 2007 at 07:35AM, Konstantin Gremliza wrote:
Someone earlier stated that this was also broken in SXDE-- as far as
I know that is *not* the case. One of the reasons this has been a
troublesome area is that in Nevada the /dev zones implementation is
Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Enda O'Connor ( Sun Micro Systems Ireland) wrote:
I tried build 74,
add device
set match=/dev/dsk/c0t0d0s7
end
add device
set match=/dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s7
end
rebooted zone and device is there ( verified it wasn't before hand )
We need the user case that fails.
Enda
Ihsan Zaghmouth wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Here is my 2 cents, after assuming that pkginfo should hold such an
information post installation.
The */var/sadm/pkg/pkgname/pkginfo* file lists among other info the
*SUNW_PKG_ALLZONES*=true | false for the installed package.
pkginfo should have an option
Ron Halstead wrote:
When patching a machine with local zones, should the local zones be halted or
left running? I can't seem to find a definitive answer.
apply latest patchadd patch
119254 SPARC
119255 x86
Once the latest patch is applies, then either halted or running will work.
One other
Enda O'Connor ( Sun Micro Systems Ireland) wrote:
Ihsan Zaghmouth wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Here is my 2 cents, after assuming that pkginfo should hold such an
information post installation.
The */var/sadm/pkg/pkgname/pkginfo* file lists among other info the
*SUNW_PKG_ALLZONES*=true | false
Mike Gerdts wrote:
On 9/6/07, Enda O'Connor ( Sun Micro Systems Ireland)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One other thing, make sure to run
patchadd -a patchid-revision
first, -a basically does a dryrun, boots any halted zones etc and does
dependency checks.
Hmmm, I've been looking for dryrun
= bdb_equality_candidates: (uid) index_param failed (18)
conn=76 op=98 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=0 nentries=1 text=
conn=76 op=99 SRCH base=ou=users,dc=tel,dc=uva,dc=es scope=1 deref=3
filter=((objectClass=posixAccount)(uid=dpercam))
conn=76 op=99 SRCH attr=cn uid uidnumber gidnumber gecos
Andrew Black wrote:
Hi
Is there a way of allowing a non global zone to see the CD drive on a
machine?
Failing that, any alternative ways forward, eg creating an image of the CD
and sharing this as a file?
Andrew
___
zones-discuss mailing
Enda O'Connor ( Sun Micro Systems Ireland) wrote:
Steve Zinck wrote:
For future reference, here's an update to my zone hung problem. It
reoccurred late last week so I updated my case with Sun with a crash
dump. After analysing it, they reported the following:
It appears you are runnning
Hi
What does zonadm -z labv490-01z5 have to say, ie is the zone in a state
other than installed?
so the complete steps for an installed zone are:
zoneadm list -cv ( just to see zone state )
zoneadm -z labv490-01z5 halt ( if not in installed state )
zoneadm -z labv490-01z5 uninstall -F
zonecfg
Yanakiev, Vladimir wrote:
Here it is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] zoneadm list -cv
ID NAME STATUS PATH
0 global running/
1 labv490-01z3 running/export/zones/labv490-01z3/main
2
Yanakiev, Vladimir wrote:
That was my first question - I can not figure out how this did happened.
We have the xml, but the entry in the index file is missing. Maybe, the
zoneadm -z...delete command got interrupted in the middle?... Fixing the
problem by deleting the file is obvious, but the
Fat Ted wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to create a sparse root zone from within a package's
postinstall script?
I've created a package; and via the postinstall script, I want to create a
basic sparse root zone. Despite the postinstall script working fine as a
stand alone script (creates zone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 10:38:56AM -0700, Penelope Cotten wrote:
Regarding new features in S10 U4:
I neglected to include another new feature.
The ability to use Live Upgrade on a system with zones
installed is also a new feature for S10 U4.
Does it work only
Hi
Essentially the zone info must be created on the destination system (
this is stored in /etc/zones, so not under zone root )
See step 5 in the second page ( How to Migrate A Non-Global Zone )
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2450/6n4o5mdga?a=view
other than the the zpool import will
Andrew Black wrote:
Is there a way of finding out the status of a particular directory from within a
nonglobal zone.
I would like to find out whether a directory is
- inherirted package directory (read only in the zone)
- zone has its own copy
- shared with the global zone
Forgive me if I
Gael wrote:
With the current thread about upgrades, I was wondering if it would be
possible to upgrade our currents frames to U4 as I would like to use the
memory capping capabilities of U4...
the one apparent issue here is that we are using Veritas for BOTH the BE
and the zones filesystems
Hi
Usually indicates a hardware problem, and a reboot (panic ) was induced
to try and preserve the system integrity.
To get more info run the FMA commands
what does fmdump ( see fmdump(1m) ) indicate,
run fmdump then fmdump -V on the uuid ie fmdumo -u UUID -V
what type of system is this as
way to enhance a zone.
We are now in the middle of correcting these problems.
If you have information about places where this problem
appears, please let us know so that we can fix the problem.
Thanks,
Ellard
Enda O'Connor ( Sun Micro Systems Ireland) wrote:
Tirthankar wrote:
Hi,
On my machine
Bob Netherton wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 13:56 +0100, Enda O'Connor ( Sun Micro Systems
Ireland) wrote:
If so how will they be patched?
ie will they have differenet package versions that those in global zone?
non-native zones would have to use non-native methods - specifically
they would
Tirthankar wrote:
Hi,
On my machine (running s01u4_06) I have 3 local zones.
pship2 @ / $ zoneadm list -cv
ID NAME STATUS PATH BRANDIP
0 global running/
native shared
2 cz2
Matt Santimore wrote:
All,
Does any one have an idea of how to get my non-global zones (14 of them)
to boot in a certain order after a global zone reboot.
I'm thinking autoboot false then write my own global zone xml to boot
them one at a time, but was hoping there is something easier.
Hi
Just a heads up that a new patchadd patch revision has been released to
SunSolve.
Revision 36 fixes issues with patchadd failing due to a bug in patchadd
that determined if a patch wazx a global zone only patch -G
functionality released with revision 34.
Also fixes issues with patchrm
Hi
Adding back the zone-discuss list
Possibly something around CR 6522362, which is due to how patchadd in
119254-34 handles patches that are THISZONEONLY=true, in particular JES
patches/packages.
I will try and replicate this, what rev of 119254 was installed prior to 34.
Enda
Freund,
Paul Davis wrote:
Is there a way to control the (auto) start order of zones or better yet
even dependencies? We have a complete, tiered environment in zones and
would like to control the start order:
DB zone - APP zone - WEB zone
Thanks,
Paul
Sivakumar Shanmugasundaram wrote:
I have a non-global zone which shows in a 'mounted' state. (Guess, I hit
on the CR#6217053
Now, I cant boot or halt it.
Any help/workaround is much appreciated.
Siva
___
zones-discuss mailing list
Sivakumar Shanmugasundaram wrote:
Shivani/Enda,
Thanks.
This worked. 'unmount' is undocumented, is it?
It's an internal zone state used by the patch/packaging tools to manage
zones that are halted.
Enda, yes. I was doing a pkgadd when I interrupted it. (to run pkgadd -G
again).
hmm, did
Phil Freund wrote:
When is it necessary to patch whole root zones directly?
I was trying to make sure that I had all of my zones ready to be updated with DST patch 122034-04 so I made sure to install patch utilities patch 119254-34 on all of the global zones. I never thought to install it on
Russ Petruzzelli wrote:
Zones gurus,
Got this note from our lab tech...
In response to the lab tech's question would we just halt and uninstall the zone, but not
delete it?
Would that allow us to restore it after the installation upgrade?
No not really, basically one would then have to run
Bill Casale wrote:
How do you update the DST patch on a whole root zone? Patch # 122032-03
has been applied to the global zone but it does not appear to have been
passed to the non global zone. On the global zone the time stamps on
the files included in that patch are changed. On the non global
Ian Brown wrote:
I must add the following:
ps -z 0
does NOT hang and is OK.
ps -z 0,3
DOES hang (again after sched)
and 3 is the id of the zone I created.
Regads,
Ian
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zones-discuss mailing list
Jay Morrison wrote:
UPDATE:
We created another zone on one of our test servers but this time watched df -Z to see
what was actually being mounted during the zonadm -z zonename install. It
turns out that everything comes up as a LOFS mount during the installation, and the
appropriate files
Steve Zinck wrote:
On 1/9/07, *Dave Bevans* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a customer using SOL 10 1/06 on a development box, needs to
control Hardware resource allocation for software licensing. Wants
to create container/zone, with a separate /var.
Hi
I need to investigate this ( is there a CR open for this issue ), but as
a workaround, it it possible to boot the zones prior to patching
119254-31, then proceed with patching halted zones.
Enda
Renaud Manus wrote:
You should be able to apply the patch if the local zones
are booted in
Andreas Koppenhoefer wrote:
This is a bug in patchadd, 6438808, the fix is
currently under test and
should appear on SunSolve shortly, days that is.
The patch is
119254-31 ( sparc )
Unfortunately we are not able to apply patch 119254-31 on our servers.
See thread
prakash wrote:
How to get global zone information from non-global zone,
any coomand or any file to get the information ?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi
Basically you would
this further (just go to single user,
mount it and luactivate it, right?) Let me know what I should do/try
to find out what is being installed in the zone prior to SUNWcsr.
Enda O'Connor ( Sun Micro Systems Ireland) wrote:
Hi
There should be a file
/var/sadm/pkg/SUNWkrbu/save/pspool/SUNWkrbu/install
57 matches
Mail list logo
