LU doesn't work for boxes with zones yet, afaik. zonepath on vxvm
volumes won't work for upgrade from 3/05 (granted, upgrade from 3/05
with zones isn't supported anyway). I have no reason to think this
would work with 1/06 either, vxconfigd has to run in order to present
the volumes to the
I am attempting to run apache as a non-root user in a non-global zone. I'm
not able to start apache, my error_log says:
Permission denied: mod_rewrite: could not create rewrite_log_lock
Thinking that this may be related to a privilege issue, I ran ppriv -e -D and
got:
httpsd.worker[14906]:
Doug Scott wrote On 08/04/06 11:42,:
create a zfs filesystem in the global zone for the zone. Something like
$ zfs create mypool/export/zones/zone1
$ mkdir -p /export/zones/zone1
$ zfs set mountpoint=/export/zones/zone1 mypool/export/zones/zone1
With zonecfg set your
Hi,
I came across a zone example that looks like this:
fs:
dir: /tmp
special: swap
raw not specified
type: tmpfs
options: [size=1024]
Hmm ... I think I know what the person is trying to do, give the zone
its own
Jerry Jelinek wrote On 08/18/06 17:21,:
It is in the man page I just looked at (mount_tmpfs(1M)).
Oy, sorry, I just looked at mount(1M).
zonecfg doesn't know about every option on every filesystem, bundled
and unbundled, that is available on Solaris. zoneadm does some
basic validation of
The zones.cpu-shares rctl has a set of threshhold actions: none, deny
and signal=. Say if I set the action as signal=TERM, who actually gets
signaled? Is it the process in the zone that's currently queuing to get
on CPU, or is it zoneadmd (which presumably will pass it back?)
I've always
Wynne Wang wrote:
Hi
I'm engineer of China, customer want to know it the application work well
under local zone. Do we have such an application list of local zone
awareness?
Such as Oracle? DB2? Siebel?
As far as I know Sun maintains no such list. There is a tool you can
use,
Christine Tran wrote:
Wynne Wang wrote:
Hi
I'm engineer of China, customer want to know it the application work well
under local zone. Do we have such an application list of local zone
awareness?
Such as Oracle? DB2? Siebel?
As far as I know Sun maintains no such list.
D'ohh
If I have an application (SUNW_PKG_ALLZONES = FALSE) that installs some
in /opt and some in /var/opt, and I set my non-global zone to have an
inherit-pkg-dir /opt, when I install the zone and when I patch the
application in the global zone, will it install and patch my NGZ
/var/opt, where
Hi,
Customer has zones with 3 out of 4 default inherit-pkg-dir, each zone
has its own /usr. They are reporting that a DST patch did not install
correctly in the non-global zone.
Perhaps related to this, last week I had another question about patching
a zone which had an /opt
Jeff Victor wrote:
See http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-1592/6mhahuoog?a=view for some
more info.
Hmm ... this does not admonish that you should not use zero i-p-d or all
four. I agree with Steffen that if this leads to an unsupported
environment the customer should at least get a
F.V.(Phil)Porcella wrote:
Last question for you all, (maybe it should get its own thread), I would like
to incorporate the /export/home directories from the global zone, into the
non-global zone.
What is the best way to do this?
Seems like I have 3 choices:
1 add inherit-pkg-dir, set
Paul Kraus wrote:
On 8/29/07, Brandorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a related, but similar situation. How does one know that they are
actually in a non-global zone vs a global zone? (Using a committed
interface).
`ps -ef` and look for pid 0,1,2,3; these should only be visible in a
global
Hi,
I just need some clarification, this does not matter in any functional
way.
I have had it explained to me that zone-to-zone communication on same
host does not actually use the loopback interface, it's a slip of
speech. The system loops traffic back within the IP stack, and you
can't
Hi,
Possibly a discrepancy between the man page and U4 functionality? I'm
on Solaris x86 U4, and
# zoneadm clone -s tank/[EMAIL PROTECTED] zone1
-s: illegal option --s
The -s is clearly documented in the man page.
CT
___
zones-discuss mailing list
A customer is unable to share something called the terminal server
ports to non-global zone. I don't know what these are, but here's the
description:
Serial sensor interfaces are fed to a patch panel and then received by
a digital terminal server. Terminal server sends output to a switch,
Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Christine Tran wrote:
A customer is unable to share something called the terminal server
ports to non-global zone. I don't know what these are, but here's
the description:
Serial sensor interfaces are fed to a patch panel and then received
by a digital terminal
Konstantin Gremliza wrote:
Hi Brad,
unfortunatly there is no
who -r
for smf.
who -r still works in a zone.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] zonename
zone1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] who -r
. run-level 3 Jan 24 14:53 3 0 S
i don't know if there is a rfe for this. the default milestone
I guess this situation is possible now?
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zones-discuss/2005-September/004340.html
Because I'm reading CR 6600677 and it appears that *that* CR is a side
effect of doing what this user was attempting to do.
If one is able to configure an lofs mount in a NGZ,
Thilo Stallherm wrote:
Hi all,
is it possible to add a ZFS to a running Zone without having to reboot
the Zone?
I was able to do it.
# zfs create tank/foo
# zfs set mountpoint=legacy tank/foo
# zfs set zoned=on tank/foo
Create the mountpoint in the zone, mount it into the running zone
#
Anne Moore wrote:
James
I am definitely using OpenSolaris as that's what I downloaded and installed,
(excuse me if it's not called 10).
it sounds like you need some local support
I feel sorry for you James. It appears you must put people down to feel
better about yourself. Why not go to
What is iSCSI?
SCSI over TCP/IP. iSCSI makes remote disks look local. The remote host
with storage resource presents iscsi targets. The client accessing the
storage is the initiator. iSCSI initiator was present in S10 3/05 and
up. iSCSI target went into S10 8/07.
Why zones on iSCSI?
iSCSI
roush wrote:
Sun Cluster plans to support an iSCSI disk as a quorum device.
Sun Cluster accesses the iSCSI disk early in the boot process.
When the iSCSI disk is on the same subnet as the cluster machines,
things work. When the iSCSI disk is on a different subnet
the system cannot find the
Follow up on this previous item:
On deck: zone detach and attach, upgrade on attach.
To be able to do the above requires that there be some kind of
preservation of the data on top of iscsi targets. I tried putting iscsi
targets into metasets which could be taken and released. Does not
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Amol Chiplunkar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would also look at zoneadm -z zone move new-path
e.g. zoneadm -z zone /large-filesystempath/zonepath
Unless you are particular about '/zones' path, you don't even have to
remount it as /zones
This is a unique
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Fredrich Maney fredrichma...@gmail.com wrote:
Instead of snooping the traffic, why not do it through DTrace? That
should meet your security requirements nicely.
fpsm
Heh! No SUNWCdtrace cluster either. In fact, I may have to sell
observability down the
My apologies for being late replying.
I've thought of posting the cluster I use but it seems that everyone
has has a special build particular to their needs.For example, most
people would not use kerberos, but it's in rnet. You could make a
case for SUNWbip, SUNWrcmdc, NTP ... how much do you
Hi,
Has anyone *actually* observe that you can communicate between zones
with the cable removed when /dev/ip ip_restrict_interzone_loopback is
set to 0?
Here's my setup, s10u5.
global: 192.168.1.60/24 e1000g0, cabled
zone1: 192.168.1.61/24 e1000g1, cabled
zone2: 192.168.1.62/24 e1000g2, not
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Jon Anderson jon.ander...@sun.com wrote:
Hi,
Do you have more details on your zone configuration? If you are
using exclusive stack zones then this is expected.
Hmm, I thought the exact opposite. zones of type exclusive-ip type,
plumbed on different
Unless ip_restrict_interzone_loopback is 0 (the default is 1 on OS).
You can have zones of type exclusive-ip plumbed on different
interfaces but not cabled up if this parameter is set to 0.
Where is this documented?
This is what started the whole kerfuffle for me,
You can add multiple physicals to a shared stack zone, they are
just added as logicals. You need the underlying interface plumbed
in the global zone though. An exclusive stack doesn't know anything
about other zones' network configuration.
OK, I'm beginning to see. Like this, you mean?
I am running into this:
https://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=79673
r...@ender:/# zoneadm -z web boot
zone 'web': Error: error mounting zone root dataset.
zone 'web':
zoneadm: zone 'web': call to zoneadmd failed
When I go to check the CR, there's nothing in the workaround. I just
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Jerry Jelinek gerald.jeli...@sun.com wrote:
You haven't provided much information so its hard
to help you. What build are you running? The
issue described in the thread you reference should
be fixed in the OpenSolaris 2008.11 release. Do
you have a second
What is the output of 'mount -p' and 'zfs list' on this
system?
r...@ender:/# mount -p
rpool/ROOT/opensolaris - / zfs - no
/devices - /devices devfs - no
/dev - /dev dev - no
ctfs - /system/contract ctfs - no
proc - /proc proc - no
mnttab - /etc/mnttab mntfs - no
swap - /etc/svc/volatile tmpfs
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Jerry Jelinek gerald.jeli...@sun.com wrote:
It would be nice to try to understand more about
what you did so we could try to figure out why
the dataset was left mounted when you halted the zone.
If there is anything unusual you can recall, please
let me
I'm writing a script that adds an LOFS to a zone, using a pre-made
batch file it works but I rather generate this on the fly.
It looks something like this:
if [ something ]; then
zonecfg -z $myzone EOF
add fs
set dir=/tmp/foo
set special=/tmp/foo
set type=lofs
add options
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Jordan Vaughan jordan.vaug...@sun.com wrote:
Hi Cristine,
I tried both methods on OpenSolaris 2008.11 and they worked for me. My
guess is that there's something wrong with your script. Perhaps you forgot
to close a control construct (e.g., end an if block
fs:
dir: /netapp/tacacs
special: /syslog-local/netapp/tacacs
raw not specified
type: lofs
options: []
fs:
dir: /netapp/syslog
special: /syslog-local/netapp/syslog
raw not specified
type: lofs
options: []
[Connected
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:25 AM, solarg sol...@laposte.net wrote:
hello all,
i'm wondering how to create a sparse zone in os2008.11:
- in solaris 10, just use create instead of create -b does a sparse
zone
- in os2008.11, you have to add manually:
add inherit-pkg-dir
Ermmm ... I don't
I realize that zoneadmd is a private interface, but, here´s a
question. Can I have a running zone and no zoneadmd running, at all?
If yes, what does it mean?
--
http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430218916
---
Pro OpenSolaris - 57
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Jerry Jelinek gerald.jeli...@sun.com wrote:
Thanks for the write-up. It is helpful for us to
know what peoples concerns are for the sparse vs. whole
root configurations.
Our application make and destroy zones as needed. We've built up a
set of tools to
Installing from a repo is orthogonal to the sparse
vs. whole root discussion. That is tracked as:
1947 Offline zone creation is impossible
I'm not complaining, just describing what's important to me (and my
shop) re:zones going forward. This thread started out as no sparse
zone on OS, sorry
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Patrick J.
McEvoyno-re...@opensolaris.org wrote:
I am trying to pre-configure zones with sysidcfg as described in:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-1592/z.login.task-38?l=ena=viewq=sysidcfg+and+containers
Basically:
clone a zone
zoneadm -z
I'm about to make a change to the dependency of routing-setup, I just
want to check first if this has been filed as a CR and has been fixed.
The problem is that zones and routing-setup both trace their
dependency back to milestone/network, but no relationship to each
other. I have a priori
Hi, I'm sorry to bug the OpenSolaris for a question that pertains to
S10U8, but I am really stuck.
I am doing a zoneadm clone -m copy, and I do not want a new ZFS
dataset even though my zonepath is on a ZFS filesystem, for
performance reasons particular to how I am using my zones.
Unfortunately,
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 3:10 AM, Frank Batschulat (Home)
frank.batschu...@sun.com wrote:
a '-x nodataset' option for 'clone' like in 'install' is unlikely going to
happen, in
fact I will remove the '-x nodataset' option for 'install' completely soon in
OSOL build 135
PSARC 2010/008 Remove
Does the data really need to be under the zonepath? If you were to do
something like:
zfs create -o mountpoint=/stuff rpool/stuff
mkdir /stuff/z1 /stuff/z2
zonecfg -z z1
add fs
set dir=/stuff
set special=/stuff/z1
set options=rw
end
exit
zonecfg -z z2
add fs
set dir=/stuff
set
Hi,
A work-around for this issue has been provided by SunSupport. The
direct parent of a zonepath must not be a dataset. That is
/tank/myzone will result in a new dataset being created.
/tank/some_empty_dir/myzone will get you a zonepath that's just a
directory. Yay, SunSupport!
CT
48 matches
Mail list logo
