--
>
> ___
> zones-discuss mailing list
> zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
--
Jeff VICTOR Sun Microsystems
is being added to the
zones framework. This will allow you to give a zone exclusive access to a NIC
and allow the zone to control its own network connection.
------
Jeff VICTOR Sun Microsystems
ate bytes (,)
>
>
> Does anyone have some insight on this?
>
> thanks
>
--
--
Jeff VICTOR Sun Microsystemsjeff.victor @ sun.com
OS AmbassadorSr. Tech
>> *Michael Barto*
>> Software Architect
>>
>> LogiQwest Circle
>> LogiQwest Inc.
>> 16458 Bolsa Chica Street, # 15
>> Huntington Beach, CA 92649
>> http://www.logiqwest.com/
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Tel: 714 377 3705
>> Fax: 714 840 3937
>> Cell:
ckage install
> for the particular package being installed, not for doing other sysadmin
> work such as creating zones.
>
> Basically even if this worked, and assuming we waited till the zone got
> created before exiting postinstall, pkgadd would run for perhaps half
> hour
nformation, including IP address, routing, naming,
etc. This will allow you to do what you are trying to do.
--
Jeff VICTOR Sun Microsystemsjeff.victor @ sun.com
OS Ambassador
ity
>> matrix:
>> http://supportconnectw.ca.com/public/etrust/etrust_ac/infodocs/etrustac-matrix.asp
>>
>> which references zones, but for a different version of the product.
>>
>> Any and all RTFM pointers appreciated.
>>
>> /jn
>>
>
>
--
at answer overall-- that it
>> would be nice if this "just worked." We'll keep trying to improve
>> things in this space.
>>
>>-dp
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Price - Solaris Kernel Engineering - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
>> blogs.sun.com/dp
> __
get a address of 192.168.74.200,
> while the global address is in the segment of 10.239.*.*
>
> How to get this work?
--
--
Jeff VICTOR Sun Microsystemsjeff.victor @ sun.com
OS
How can someone learn whether a package was installed in the global zone
*with* -G - or without it?
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
What are the default and maximum values for the new zone-specific
resource controls:
zone.max-shm-memory
zone.max-shm-ids
zone.max-msg-ids
zone.max-sem-ids
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
If you mean "does Oracle support Oracle products in Solaris 8/9
Containers" the answer would depend on which Oracle product, and which
version of that product. Many of the Oracle products that are currently
running on Solaris 8 systems are very old versions, and Oracle no longer
supports them o
> I am planning to migrate a server running Solaris 8
> to a Solaris 8 container. .. On the new server I want to install
> Solaris 10 (global zone) and install 2 Solaris 8
> containers (brandz) under that global zone. I was
> told that there is no need to purchase solaris 8 or 9
> (brandZ) license.
Yes, a zone can be configured as an "exclusive-IP" zone which gives it
the ability to configure IPMP within the zone - and other networking
abilities.
See http://blogs.sun.com/JeffV/entry/high_availability_networking_for_solaris
and
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-1592/gepxo?l=en&a=view&q=ex
On S10 8/07 I just created a zone with a zonepath on a ZFS fs, and it
seems to work correctly:
global# zlogin ozone
# df -k
Filesystemkbytesused avail capacity Mounted on
/1007529 81998 925531 9%/
/dev 1007529 81998 925531 9%
IMO the behavior of errors in zones should mimic that of errors in
non-zoned systems, with the addition of the concept of the global zone
as platform administrative area, as you stated.
So the message in this case should go to the global zone and to the
zone in which the error occurred.
On Mon, A
rcapstat(1M).
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 1:29 AM, Gauss Tang - Sun Microsystems
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Expert,
>
> We can check the zone memory allocation via command
>
> zonecfg -z zonename info
>
> capped-memory:
> physical: 256M
>
> But how to check this info after longin the zone?
>
This doesn't answer your question, but it may help resolve issues you
haven't experience yet: I created 1,000 zones on a system. I wrote
about the experience here:
http://blogs.sun.com/JeffV/entry/spawning_0_5kz_hr_part
http://blogs.sun.com/JeffV/entry/spawning_0_5kz_hr_part1
http://blogs.sun.com/J
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Patrick Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can a non-global zone utilize all the available memory on the system if
> resource management is not used and rcap is not used?
A non-global zone could use up most of the free physical memory on the
system. If that happened,
Hi Syed,
I would not be surprised to find that rcapd is behaving correctly on
your system. All of the containers in one Solaris instance share one
Solaris paging system and one set of swap devices. When rcapd is
paging the memory pages of one container out to the swap device, other
workloads shari
Hello Vincent,
>From your message, it appears that you do not need to use capped-cpu.
However, if you find that you have a need to use both, it will work,
although there is potential to confuse Solaris and/or yourself. For
example, what happens if you set cpu-shares so that a zone must get at
leas
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Vincent Boisard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your help,
>
> Comments below ...
>
> On 9/2/08, Jeff Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Vincent,
>>
>> From your message, it appears that you do
Hi Lewis,
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:03 AM, Lewis Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a simple zone configured to test the VxFS 'convosync=direct'
> option. It's an s10u5 machine with no additional patches:
>
>zonecfg:lt203398:fs> info
>fs:
>dir: /fo
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Jerry Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:55:53PM +0100, Lewis Thompson wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 09:04 -0400, Jeff Victor wrote:
>>>> The zonecfg man page has
I have heard that Sybase runs in a Solaris 8 Container. Can anyone
provide details on versions of Sybase that have been run in a Solaris
8 Container, and whether Sybase can run in an S8C and use raw devices
?
Thanks,
--JeffV
___
zones-discuss mailing lis
Adding zones-discuss.
Mike Gerdts wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 4:57 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> While U6 has many significant enhancements, most notably ZFS Root/Boot, it
>> is likely that Zones on ZFS will only be fully supported in U7.
>>
>
> This is really quite surprising
Nicolas Dorfsman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> My english should not good enough to make you understand.
>
> STOP please to write zonepath on ZFS is supported. Everytime you say
> that, the next sentence is to say "but with limitations, blabla".
>
We try to provide all of the releva
Although it's a feature, if you need this functionality, the global
zone can store its name in a file which the Container can read.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Nicolas Dorfsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le 2 oct. 08 à 21:00, Bruce, Phillip a écrit :
>
> If your logged into a container, how
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Challa, Narsimha Reddy (STSD-HYD)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 7. Can we get CPU and Memory utilization statistics used by a specific
> container (either from with in the container or from global zone)?
"prstat -Z" may provide the data you want to see.
--
--
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Eric Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Our customers like to run existing Oracle database inside Solaris 8/9
> container using Sun Cluster. Please kindly advise if
> - Is this configuration certified by Oracle?
You should ask Oracle. They will want to k
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Ben Rockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason King wrote:
>> I haven't found any documentation (yet, still looking), that says
>> anything either way, but I'm wondering to facilitate zone migration if
>> you can place a zone root on an NFS filesystem? Obviously w
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Tamer Embaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steffen Weiberle wrote:
>>> 5. Can somebody clarify me whether ZFS is supported for containers?
>>> Since ZFS has the concept of creating pool of devices first and on top
>>> of that file systems can be created. I would
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Tommy McNeely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Zones experts,
>
> We are attempting to create a new data center architecture that favors
> virtualization with zones. Previously, if we wanted to have zones from
> different security contexts (front-end, back-end, in
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Mike Gerdts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Jeff Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> If you have any comments, or suggestions for improvement, please let
>> me know on this e-mail list o
0 updates.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Victor
> Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 5:54 PM
> To: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Subject: [zones-discuss] Zone Statistics: monitoring resource use of zones
>
> It ha
It has become clear that there is a need to monitor resource
consumption of workloads in zones, and an easy method to compare
consumption to resource controls. In order to understand how a
software tool could fulfill this need, I created an OpenSolaris
project and a prototype to get started. If thi
ble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 1:54 AM, Jeff Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It has become clear that there is a need to monitor resource consumption of
>> workloads in zones, and an easy method to compare
>> consumption to resource co
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Mike Gerdts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Jeff Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> To me, the clearest example would be a kstat, per zone, which provides
>> the total amount of CPU time for all of
come from the kernel
> version, would that be a better way to identify release version in your
> script; Just a thought.
>
> In the meantime I tricked the script to think I am on update 5 and I am
> getting better results.
>
>
> -= Kevin =-
>
>
> -Original Me
It should be possible to:
zoneadm -z move /zones/tmp/
zoneadm -z move /
That prevents a need to use zonecfg or doing unsupported things.
Yes?
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Christine Tran
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Amol Chiplunkar
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Mike Gerdts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Jeff Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Kevin,
>>
>> I believe that you cannot patch your way from U1 to U5 - i.e. that the
>> system is missing
Hi Rainer,
(see below)
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Rainer Orth
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've recently tried to temporarily change zone.cpu-shares of the global
> zone on a Sun Fire X4200 M2 running Solaris 10 Update 5. Per default, both
> the global and the imap zone have 10 shares:
>
>
Hi Elkhaoul,
Unless you have used a non-default configuration, zones can
communicate with each other and with the global zone using IP
addresses even if the network cable has been removed.
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:27 AM, elkhaoul elkhaoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have multiple Zone
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Ian Matchett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Solaris 8/07 a customer is running in a zone but java 1.5 is getting out
> of memory error.
The fact that it's running in a zone is irrelevant unless the software
is trying to modify the kernel, drivers, etc. This can b
Hi Josh,
Given that no one has responded to this in 2 weeks, I think you'll
need to place a call to Sun Support to get this resolved, if you
haven't already.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Josh Rivel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have roughly 700 devices running OpenSolaris snv_81 w
Hi Jon,
With shared-IP zones the network statistics are not broken out
per-zone. If you configure the zone as an exclusive-IP zone, it gets
its own NICs, and the per-NIC counters will display what you want.
You didn't mention if your interest was in Solaris, OpenSolaris, or
both. In the future,
Hot off the press!
Glenn Brunette and I wrote a Sun BluePrint that explains the security
features of Solaris Zones/Containers:
http://wikis.sun.com/display/BluePrints/Understanding+the+Security+Capabilities+of+Solaris+Zones+Software
Contents
* Zone Root File System
* Process Containment
Why is the sys_config priv needed to set the sticky bit on a file or directory?
This priv is not allowed in a zone, so a process in a zone can't set
the sticky bit.
Thanks for pointers...
--JeffV
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.
Hi Jason,
I frequently recommend creating a writable /usr/local under the
read-only /usr to solve this problem.
One simple method to do this is:
zonecfg -z myzone
add fs
set special=/mypool/zones/usr-local
set dir=/usr/local
set type=lofs
end
exit
Will that work for you?
--JeffV
On Thu, Jan 2
A NIC can be added to a running shared-IP zone by using the ifconfig
command its zone parameter.
Can an unplumbed NIC be added to a running exclusive-IP zone usnig the
same method? (I don't have a system with enough NICs to test this.)
Thanks,
--JeffV
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:36 PM, pol.barthel...@sun.com
wrote:
> Hello,
> It is supported to move zones from a sun4u to a sun4v or vice-versa ?
Full support is available for that, starting with S10 10/08 (aka U6).
--
--JeffV
___
zones-discuss mailing
Is it a sparse-root zone or a whole-root zone? It should be visible in
a sparse-root, but a whole-root zone has its own separate copy of
/usr.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Arun Gupta wrote:
> I installed GlassFish in global zone in /usr directory. However this
> directory does not seem to be
Please provide the output of "ifconfig -a" and "netstat -rn" for each
non-global zone.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Charles Meo wrote:
> Greetings all,
>
> I have been trying to set up a X2200 with a global zone on an internal LAN
> with bge0, and two zones for web servers each having a privat
e
information, such as:
Output of "zonecfg ... info"
Output of "mount" in both the GZ and the zone.
> -Arun
>
> Jeff Victor wrote:
>>
>> Is it a sparse-root zone or a whole-root zone? It should be visible in
>> a sparse-root, but a whole-root zo
Sorry Alex, I didn't include enough information to properly convey my idea.
>From the *global* zone, you would use
# mount -F lofs /root/
For example:
# mount -F lofs /mypool/zones/myzone-usr-local /zones/myzone/root/usr/local
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Maidak Alexander J
wrote:
> T
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Derek McEachern
wrote:
> We are in the process of deploying applications into zones and I've been
> looking at how to monitor what each zone is up to regarding resource usage.
> I downloaded the zonestat.pl script to play around with and out of the box it
> didn'
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Timothy Kennedy
wrote:
>
>
> Nicolas Dorfsman wrote:
>>
>> It would be a great idea to have a easy solution to give these privileges
>> to a zone.
>
> in zonecfg for a given zone,
> set limitpriv=default,proc_lock_memory,proc_priocntl,sys_time
>
> David Comay has a
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Asif Iqbal wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am running solaris 10 update 6. I know I cannot nfs share a non-global zone
> folder.
>
> I want to have a central syslog server on non global zone and have the
> log file shared with remote hosts
>
> Is there a workaround?
A zone ca
doesn't hurt performance - or anything else.
> Has any work started on a 'real' zonestat yet?
I believe that design work has begun, but these things take time...
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Jeff Victor
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Derek Mc
Hello Gael,
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Gael wrote:
> Hello
>
> Got a zone running SAS with cpu capping enabled using a processor set as we
> see a few processes using quite a bit of cpu there too often.
Is that zone assigned to a resource pool, or is it using the
dedicated-cpus feature?
>
read
> Again, thanks !
> Regards
>
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Jeff Victor wrote:
> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> Hello Gael,
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Gael wrote:
>> > Hello
>> >
>> > Got a zone running SAS with c
(Either way, I wouldn't expect
Sun to do this during CY2009. However, if you have sufficient interest
and ability... :-) ).
--JeffV
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Jeff Victor wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Gael wrote:
>>
>> Many thanks to Bob Netherton an
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Bob Netherton wrote:
>
>> 1. Do you use "set pool=" anymore, now that the dedicated-cpu feature exists?
>
> Until Oracle develops a more rational licensing scheme you should
> expect this feature to be in use. I may have many Oracle instances,
> each in a separate
Thanks for the great feedback Gael. Comments below.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Gael wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Jeff Victor wrote:
>>
>> Some questions:
>> 1. Do you use "set pool=" anymore, now that the dedicated-cpu feature exists?
&g
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 01:22:25PM -0500, Jeff Victor wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Gael wrote:
>> > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Jeff Victor
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Some
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Anthony Yeung wrote:
> Can we setup resource pool inside a Zone?
HI Anthony,
If you are logged into a zone, you cannot set up a resource pool.
If you want to create a resource pool and assign a zone to it, you can
do that from the global zone. You can either crea
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 5:36 AM, Stewart Mathieson
wrote:
> IHAC who is using the Solaris Migration Tools/Solaris 8 Container and the
> licence agreement in the download talks about only being a 90 day evaluation
> RTU licence
>
> https://cds.sun.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/WFS/CDS-CDS_SMI-Site/
Just FYI: I measured patching throughput improvement with the
not-yet-released Zones Parallel Patching patch. You can read about my
findings at http://blogs.sun.com/JeffV/entry/patching_zones_goes_zoom
.
--JeffV
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-disc
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
>
> 121430-33 (or higher) supports ZFS root with ZFS zonepaths (each in their
> own zpools). Been testing this extensively as a POC and it works, lucreate
> plus patching. We did file bug 6819838 on preservation of mountpoint
> settings after lucre
I posted Zonestat v1.4 at the Zone Statistics project page
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/zonestat (click on "Files" in the
left navbar).
My blog http://blogs.sun.com/jeffv lists the new features and bug fixes.
Please send questions and requests to zones-discuss@opensolaris.org .
--JeffV
___
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Henrik Johansson wrote:
> Nice work Jeff!
Thanks Henrik!
> Some thoughts:
>
> Would not 1024 be bettet suited than 1000 for shorten? Currently if I set a
> swap capping with zonecfg to 256G it is displayed as 275G in zonestat.
>
> It would be nice to check for pat
Just in case you need it: another +1.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
> Dan Price wrote:
>>
>> Belatedly, a big +1. Jerry, if you have not already, I can take this to the
>> OGB for creation.
>
> Thanks Dan. I think we have enough votes now. I will see about getting this
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Vincent Boisard wrote:
> Thanks for your help,
>
> Let me summarize this:
>
> - Shared IP has the advantage that the global zone fully administers the
> network: zone don't have to (and even CAN'T) bother with it. There may be a
> slight advantage performance wise.
Ketan,
Adding to Steffen's comments: if you are not using zones, or if you
are configuring multiple zones to share a processor set, you would use
the poolcfg(1M) command to set pool.scheduler to FSS. See also
libpool(3LIB) and resource_controls(5).
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Steffen
Weiber
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:06 AM, Michael
McKnight wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I recently took on a project to run a VirtualBox guest within a whole Solaris
> zone. The idea was to protect the Solaris system from any crashes vbox might
> have. I need to run vbox on a production system, but I di
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Phil Freund wrote:
> I have a couple of servers that are still running U1 but I'd still like to
> use zonestat to get as much info as I can.
>
> I get the following output when I run zonestat 1.4.1 with debug turned on:
>
> root> zonestat -l -N
> /usr/sbin/prtconf
Sorry, it's either line 513/514 - the one that gets the kstat
"swapresv_zone" or 504/504, the one that gets the kstat
"lockedmem_zone".
I need to clean out the "deadwood" in v1.5, too.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Phil Freund wrote:
> Jeff,
>
> Those lines were already commented out. It looks
Is this Solaris 10 or OpenSolaris? Which update or release?
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 1:29 PM, John Larsen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> im new to solaris and zones.
>
> I am exploring non-global zones for environment setup for testing. I have
> installed non-global zone and able to login etc and su to root
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Peter Tribble wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> Alexander Skwar writes:
>>
>>> What he plans can be done easily using NGZ (non-global zones).
>>> An NGZ also adds just a little bit of overhead (if any at all) to the
>>> system - unlik
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Anon Y Mous wrote:
>> One thing I've found to be true though: either a machine is all zoned, or
>> not.
>> It gets horribly confusing to have real activity in the global zone,
>> where you can half see the non-global zones, so if you have zones
>> on a machine the
#x27;t have to worry
> about
> as yet undiscovered security holes.
>
> This is a serious concern for many customers.
>
> C) Less time to install and less time to patch.
>
> JIm
>
>
>
> Jeff Victor wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Anon
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Anon Y Mous wrote:
> I found this thread at forums.sun.com :
>
> http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5333685
>
> Looks like some ambitious Solaris sysadmins have already been running UNFS3
> in Solaris Zones!
Yes, I mentioned this concept over a year ago du
Has anyone written a tool to provide per-zone reporting of CPU usage -
that can be shared? I know someone who wants to do this.
Thanks in advance,
--JeffV
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Best regards,
>
> HeCSa.
> http://www.aosug.com.ar
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Jeff Victor
> wrote:
>>
>> Has anyone written a tool to provide per-zone reporting of CPU usage -
>> that can be shared? I know
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:59 AM, Rainer Orth
wrote:
> As far as I've been able to find out so far, Solaris 8 and 9 branded
> zones are available and supported on Solaris 10 only right now, and only
> for SPARC. Are there any plans to provide them for x86 and Nevada, too?
There wasn't much Solari
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Ketan wrote:
> bash-3.00# poolcfg -d -c 'transfer 8 from pset pset_default to pset-app'
> poolcfg: cannot transfer 8 from pset_default to pset-app: Invalid
> configuration
> bash-3.00#
> why i 'm getting this error ?
Probably pset-app is already at its maximum.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Ketan wrote:
> I 've 2 questions regarding resource pools and projects,
>
> 1. My system has 5 zones and 2 pools configured.
> Now, how can i check which zone is running with with pool with the ps
> command , not with zonecfg command.
See poolstat(1M)
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Joseph Balenzano
wrote:
> Paolo Merisio wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> actually we can add to zone configuration an object called "dedicated-cpu"
> with properties "ncpus" and "importance".
> This object create a dedicated cpu Pool when zone starts and puts from 1 to
> "nc
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Ketan wrote:
> Can anyone answer my questions
>
> 1. Whats the difference between project.max-locked-memory and max-rss.
> And out these 2 which is the preferred way of limiting the physical memory in
> a project or zone.
RSS means "Resident Set Size" and can be
It would be useful to know if the memory leak is in locked memory or
not. What isthe output of the following command, in both cases (app in
GZ, app in a zone):
GZ# pmap -x
--JeffV
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:09 AM, AdinaKalin
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm struggling with the following problem and I ha
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:12 PM, andrew wrote:
> Is there any way to limit the amount of I/O that a zone can do? I'm thinking
> particularly of disk IOPS, but a general way of limiting I/O would be fine
> too.
You can limit network I/O using features of Project Crossbow. It's
fully described a
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 8:51 AM, David Browning wrote:
> I built an Opensolaris media server and backup machine for my local network.
>
> At some point I would like to add ampache to my setup. If you are not
> familiar, it is a media server that will stream audio/video to client devices
> over th
That suggestion would be an improvement, but implies that any value
greater than 1 must be an integer, which isn't true.
--JeffV
Sent from my Tricorder
On Apr 28, 2010, at 5:14 AM, Loïc Mahé wrote:
The comment for capped-cpu is wrong since this parameter doesn't
accept ranges :
What is 3386? Is it the zone's init?
Just a guess: Zone users are not allowed to learn of pids outside of
the zone.
--JeffV
Sent from my Tricorder
On Jun 2, 2010, at 3:30 AM, "Frank Batschulat (Home)" > wrote:
just noticed something strange, perhaps someone has an explanation ?
after bo
If you configure a zone to use the exclusive-IP feature, the global
zone will not be able to use the zone's network interfaces. See the
zonecfg(1M) man page.
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 6:23 AM, Orvar Korvar
wrote:
> I am a home user with a PC and two SunRay2.
>
> I wonder if it is possible to shut d
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Orvar Korvar
wrote:
> Ok, so I shut down e1000g0 which means my global zone can not access
> internet. The local zone will have e1000g0:1 which I do not shut down, which
> means the local zone can access internet. Correct?
>
> But, if we look at this picture
> ht
Hi Paul,
It looks like the ABE's copy of zone z01.nyc-sed3 can't be brought to
the state it needs to be in, to continue LU processing.
Can the "real" zone z01.nyc-sed3 be booted? "zoneadm list..." shows
it's not currently running. If it won't boot, try to address that
problem first.
--JeffV
On
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Petr Benes wrote:
>> Limit the damage if the Zone's VBox application is somehow
>> subverted by the guest OS.
>
> There are VBox modules in the kernel and the containers framework
> can't stop misbehavior in kernelspace.
The use of kernel modules in VBox doesn't w
Back to the original question (locked-shm-memory on servers):
If you are running multiple applications on a server, and at least one
of them uses shared memory, you should consider using max-shm-memory
or max-locked-memory for the zone that will use shared memory.
Any memory that a process locks
Orvar,
The document
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/download/Project+isc/WebHome/820%2D7017.pdf
may give you a better understanding of the security capabilities of
Solaris Zones.
--JeffV
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Orvar Korvar
wrote:
> I am thinking if it is safer to reach the outside wor
201 - 300 of 306 matches
Mail list logo
