-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Apr 24, 2009, at 06:52 , Andreas Jung wrote:
Am 23.04.2009 um 22:23 schrieb Jens Vagelpohl:
On Apr 23, 2009, at 20:13 , Andreas Jung wrote:
Does anyone know about the procedure for uploading stuff to
download.zope.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Apr 24, 2009, at 09:49 , Chris Withers wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
Is it really the case that no-one knows what's going on here?
Maybe nobody else cares enough to do the debugging you're too lazy
to do? ;)
Tres,
That's not exactly fair.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Apr 24, 2009, at 16:35 , Chris Withers wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Sorry Chris, but that's exactly the method you use every single time.
You complain very loudly and expect others to come to your help and
fix stuff without doing any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Apr 23, 2009, at 11:57 , Lacko Roman wrote:
Hi,
Could someone explain me what that message means ?
This simply means that during a moderation queue cleanup of probably
100 (mostly spam) messages to the foundation-info list your post was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Apr 23, 2009, at 20:13 , Andreas Jung wrote:
Does anyone know about the procedure for uploading stuff to
download.zope.org?
Stephan Richter is maintaining the contents of download.zope.org with
a series of scripts that do a simple PyPI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Apr 2, 2009, at 22:53 , Tres Seaver wrote:
+1 to making svn-over-http read-only checkouts work.
This is now working. The repository can be reached under...
http://svn.zope.org/repos/main/
jens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 28, 2009, at 01:16 , thedag...@gmail.com wrote:
Telling someone to install all of Plone just to make filesystem
content available seems insane, sorry. There are several products out
there which can do the job, like LocalFS.
LocalFS has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 27, 2009, at 18:11 , Tim Nash wrote:
Or you may be able to use CMF 'Filesystem directory view'. The
easiest way
to do that is to use Plone 3.
Telling someone to install all of Plone just to make filesystem
content available seems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 10, 2009, at 17:37 , Roger Ineichen wrote:
svn co -r 93260
svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/zc.table/trunk/src/zc/table zc.table
fails for me with:
svn: Connection closed unexpectedly
(tried from different countries)
I have that problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 10, 2009, at 21:35 , Ken Winter wrote:
I have done something to my Zope instance that has prevented Zope from
starting (after many years of working fine). Can you help me find a
way
out?
From the traceback it looks like the Zope
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 5, 2009, at 16:32 , Martijn Faassen wrote:
Thanks for pointing that out. If we moved it could you put a
redirect in
place that just pointed .../zope3docs to .../zopeframework?
I think to get started on the move we could copy the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 5, 2009, at 18:24 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Let's do this:
- svn copy zope3docs to zopeframework
- once you think zopeframework is ready for public viewing, let me
know and I'll set up a self-updating sandbox and a redirect
- after
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 5, 2009, at 17:55 , Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jens, could you pick up zopeframework/trunk now for
http://docs.zope.org/zopeframework? And put a redirect in place for
http://docs.zope.org/zope3docs to the new location?
We can then retire
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 5, 2009, at 19:08 , Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hey,
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On Mar 5, 2009, at 17:55 , Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jens, could you pick up zopeframework/trunk now for
http://docs.zope.org/zopeframework? And put a redirect in place
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 5, 2009, at 08:24 , Christian Theune wrote:
As Dan pointed out, some of those documents are a bit more general
than
Zope Framework, but, then again, they're also more general than Zope
3.
So even for that its better to have them in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My suggestion would be foundation-i...@zope.org, since the ZF is the
publisher of the ZPL at this point.
jens
On Feb 26, 2009, at 12:32 , Baiju M wrote:
Can anyone please verify this change. As it is related to license,
I thought just get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 23, 2009, at 17:58 , Andreas Jung wrote:
- the new.zope.org skins should be removed for docs.zope,org. Since
all/most of the content will be auto-generated through Sphinx it
should be sufficient to adjust the color scheme, putting a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 21, 2009, at 08:55 , Andreas Jung wrote:
- - are there any legal issues with the design layout in case we
want to
make modifications? I know that the designer of new.zope.org theme
made some trouble when it came to discussion about the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 16, 2009, at 19:43 , Dieter Maurer wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote at 2009-2-16 19:20 +0100:
...
Please come off it. Either become an active contributor and
participate
in our dictatorship
I will never participate in your dictatorship!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 2, 2009, at 18:32 , Christian Theune wrote:
Nevertheless, you're right about the ease of writing ReST in my own
editor.
What's even better: SVN-based documentation (or buildouts that create
it) can be automated so that the site can be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 1, 2009, at 06:54 , Stephan Richter wrote:
On Saturday 31 January 2009, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
I just need to know what to look for to see if
it's fixed.
Works.
Quick question: How is doenload.zope.org maintained? Shell access? And
who
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 31, 2009, at 20:23 , Simon Michael wrote:
Oh. That seems a pity, with Zope 3.4 just out; a site facelift would
help. Would the designer care to comment ?
The designer is not part of the community. He won't see your mail.
jens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 31, 2009, at 09:49 , Stephan Richter wrote:
On Saturday 31 January 2009, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Saturday 31 January 2009, Christian Theune wrote:
Darn. The moment I send the mail I realise that Stephan said he'll
move
the URLs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 31, 2009, at 10:06 , Tres Seaver wrote:
If you could provide a little bit more context since I have no idea
how download.zope.org is managed I could look at it. I need to know
what the URLs are that do not work.
Probably the virtualhost
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 29, 2009, at 14:42 , Christian Theune wrote:
wiki.zope.org is down. The hosting centre operator just sent a mail
that they have power outages and the location at which wiki.zope.org
sits is affected.
All services should be restored. One
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 16, 2009, at 18:25 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
The concept of
giving SVN repositories any kind of quality level aspect failed in the
same way. Dependencies are specified in the setup.py and egg metadata.
Quality is judged by who has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 13, 2009, at 20:53 , Jeff Peterson wrote:
Don’t quote me but I believe Plone 3 runs on the Zope 3 framework
already. Anyone?
No.
jens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Member.
2. Sponsorship Members, members who financially sponsor the
Foundation.
3. Emeritus Members, members who retired from active membership.
The new bylaws can be downloaded from the Zope Foundation website at
http://foundation.zope.org/bylaws/zope_foundation_bylaws.pdf
Jens
Member.
2. Sponsorship Members, members who financially sponsor the
Foundation.
3. Emeritus Members, members who retired from active membership.
The new bylaws can be downloaded from the Zope Foundation website at
http://foundation.zope.org/bylaws/zope_foundation_bylaws.pdf
Jens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 13, 2008, at 14:42 , Benji York wrote:
I'd like for us to disallow pre-1.5 Subversion clients from making
commits starting one year from now (or sooner if there is consensus).
+1
jens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 9, 2008, at 13:05 , Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
A 'svn up' at svn.zope.org returns an error atm:
svn: Can't find a temporary directory: Error string not specified yet
I have poked around a little bit and it appears there's a hard drive
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 4, 2008, at 09:10 , Andreas Jung wrote:
In the meantime, we can acknowledge that 2.8 and 2.9 are
retired (no
future work except maybe important security fixes),
+1
and announce that
2.10 will be retired after the 2.12 release:
We
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 4, 2008, at 13:59 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
If I'm not mistaken there was something about every release being
supported two years after its initial release in those discussions.
But time went on, we haven't sticked to a time-based
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 27, 2008, at 13:08 , Roché Compaan wrote:
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 14:07 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
- Plone uses too many indexes, and in particular, uses multiple text
indexes. Having extra indexes around just in case is a sure lose
a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 27, 2008, at 13:32 , Roché Compaan wrote:
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:23 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
When it comes to integrating anything in Zope itself I'd choose the
latter.
Sure, we're not trying to get this into Zope, we're just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 26, 2008, at 16:37 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
I'd like to change the egg distribution alone and introduce one
setuptools extra to it. The old tarball distribution would stay the
same.
The standard Zope2 egg install would only include
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 20, 2008, at 14:05 , kevin gill wrote:
Hi,
I need a little help. I checked two packages into svn.zope.org, but
I have
set up the hierarchy incorrectly.
The packages are z3c.rotterdam and z3c.boston. The egg is in the base
folder,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 10, 2008, at 17:00 , Chris Withers wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd be grateful for a rough idea on when there could be a Zope 2.x
release
working with Python 2.6 as a 64-bit Windows application.
Given that we don't even have Zope
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 24, 2008, at 18:11 , Paul Winkler wrote:
Any thoughts on the fix itself?
I've got two branches now, against trunk and against 1.5:
.../branches/slinkp-fix-anonymous-performance-branch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 1, 2008, at 08:54 , Christian Theune wrote:
Good morning,
My Nagios just alarmed me, that the wiki is down. Anybody around who
can
poke it?
Works fine for me.
jens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 1, 2008, at 11:06 , Christian Theune wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 09:15 +0200, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On Oct 1, 2008, at 08:54 , Christian Theune wrote:
Good morning,
My Nagios just alarmed me, that the wiki is down. Anybody around who
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 23, 2008, at 20:55 , Paul Winkler wrote:
(There does not seem to be a 1.6 branch.)
We have informally decided to proceed with a simpler trunk + tags
release policy, right now there's no need to add the complication of
release branches.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Aug 29, 2008, at 12:09 , Sascha Welter wrote:
Hi!
The DNS for cvs.zope.org (used to send out password mails from
zope.org)
points to 74.84.203.155. The reverse lookup of 74.84.203.155 points to
203-155.baymountain.com and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Aug 26, 2008, at 17:55 , Behrens, Matt wrote:
I am sort of at my wit's end trying to find out how to work this out,
and I've been sort of absent from Zope-dom for the a few years, so
please forgive me if I've missed an obvious statement
On Aug 16, 2008, at 11:06 , Dieter Maurer wrote:
The easiest way to determine the uid is probably
to locate the object via a catalog search. You will get a catalog
proxy
for the object, often also called brain.
This proxy has the method getPath()
which returns the object's uid -- don't
On Aug 15, 2008, at 02:35 , Christophe Combelles wrote:
We should also probably consider waiting a bit more for the new site
(new.zope.org) to come up, but I don't know when it will be
finished. It only
needs some content for zope2, grok, and some other pages.
I don't see the connection
On Aug 14, 2008, at 13:59 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Unknown
---
Subject: Storesonline, Plan for an ecommerce Website.
From: Mister Nice Guy
Date: Wed Aug 13 09:14:30 EDT 2008
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-August/
On Aug 13, 2008, at 22:42 , Ricardo Bánffy wrote:
Hi folks.
I was giving a class on Zope/Plone administration and one of the
students asked about an official guide on Zope capacity planning. I
searched zope.org, asked all mighty Google and wandered through both
the darkest and lightest
On Aug 11, 2008, at 10:07 , Christian Theune wrote:
a) the wiki is down. Can someone please fix this?
Well, it wasn't down like it always was on the old server, Apache just
served an empty page for it. This appears to have been a (unrelated)
Apache configuration. It's fixed now.
jens
On Aug 11, 2008, at 14:26 , Benjamin Michiels wrote:
Hi,
(I'm new to Zope and Plone, so don't hesitate to indicate me a more
appropriate
mailing-list if necessary)
You may get better Plone-related answers on the Plone list(s). See
plone.org.
jens
On Jul 21, 2008, at 17:55 , Chris Withers wrote:
Is it just me or is the cache behaviour still pretty weird?
I'm trying to upload the windows build for 2.11.1 and have had to
log in 2 or 3 times...
It is still weird and it will probably remain that way. The caching
tier is independent
On Jul 17, 2008, at 14:02 , Baiju M wrote:
Hi all,
Few weeks back Buildout site become live, Jens Vagelpohl setup
the
site at http://buildout.zope.org/ But I couldn't work further on
the site.
If anyone want contribute to the content please add it here:
svn co svn://svn.zope.org
On Jul 12, 2008, at 09:33 , Mark Hammond wrote:
Well, Zope moved onwards from PAS to PAU and I think Plone should
too,
because:
It seems like just yesterday that PAS offered the promise of being
the nice
clean way forward for authentication, and even offered a path to
Zope3.
I've been
On Jul 12, 2008, at 03:04 , Florian Friesdorf wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:56:19PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
The one thing I am missing is: why?
Well, Zope moved onwards from PAS to PAU
Huh? Zope 2 uses PAS. The Zope 3 folks have attempted to come up with
a similar solution,
Hi Chad,
The mailing list for technical questions is [EMAIL PROTECTED], the one you
sent your request to is only for technical or organizational issues
pertaining to the zope.org websites and services.
Currently we use pound as a front end to Zope instances (mainly 2.8
and
2.9). To
On Jul 8, 2008, at 18:51 , Erik Myllymaki wrote:
I am using LDAPUserFolder-2.9 with Zope 2.10.6 on Ubuntu 7.
It is working well, users can log in and I can map groups to Zope
roles.
However, I was hoping that I could assign groups local roles, so
that I can allow groups to be 'Managers'
On Jun 20, 2008, at 06:20 , David Lawson wrote:
Dave, is there a way to go back to the caching configuration that
existed before the move? The current caching is way too aggressive
and prevents people from doing any content creation and editing on
zope.org.
Well. I had a look and I can
On Jun 18, 2008, at 20:30 , yuppie wrote:
The current Zope 2 policy doesn't make sure the change history of
unreleased versions is complete. But that's no essential part of
that policy. And working with unreleased versions you might use
subversion anyway.
See, I think that's bad. The
On Jun 19, 2008, at 09:51 , Christian Theune wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 09:08:54AM +0200, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
See, I think that's bad. The change log should reflect all changes,
be
it in a released version or from Subversion. Or be it a release
branch
or the trunk.
Please note
On Jun 19, 2008, at 12:32 , yuppie wrote:
There is always *one* well defined current maintenance branch.
Version numbering *does* imply a time line if you ignore old
maintenance branches. It's not hard at all to get this right.
I don't think that assumption holds true. Again, using the
On Jun 19, 2008, at 13:36 , yuppie wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On Jun 19, 2008, at 12:32 , yuppie wrote:
There is always *one* well defined current maintenance branch.
Version numbering *does* imply a time line if you ignore old
maintenance branches. It's not hard at all to get
On Jun 19, 2008, at 14:41 , Martijn Faassen wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
Christian Theune wrote:
[snip]
My preference would be to have more important changes first.
Please don't make it a judgement call: keep it time-descending
order,
just like the releases. Among other things, this makes
On Jun 19, 2008, at 20:53 , Andreas Jung wrote:
I am logged in as ajung.
http://zope.org/Products/Zope/2.11.0
shows up with all Plohn edit options.
http://zope.org/Products/Zope/2.10.6/
does not.
Even worser:
wget http://zope.org/Products/Zope/2.11.0/folder_contents;
returns the page from
On Jun 18, 2008, at 12:09 , Christian Theune wrote:
- A change on a branch is recorded in the next unreleased section.
(Merges of
the same fix over multiple branches are not recorded in different
places on
the other branches.)
This results in the following properties for the CHANGES.txt:
On Jun 18, 2008, at 14:32 , Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 01:11:46PM +0200, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Just for clarification, does this imaginary scenario describe what
you
mean?
- I am fixing a problem in the 1.2-branch of my Foobar product and
note
the fix
On Jun 18, 2008, at 15:07 , Christian Theune wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 02:48:22PM +0200, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
So in essence it sounds like changes will be noted in CHANGES.txt for
*all* those branches and the trunk that they're applied to, and the
only
difference is the version
On Jun 18, 2008, at 19:00 , yuppie wrote:
Why do we maintain a CHANGES.txt file? Who reads it and why?
The audience I have in mind are users of released versions. They
read CHANGES.txt to figure out what's new in a release.
Let's take Zope 2 as an example:
Most people will currently use
On Jun 18, 2008, at 19:27 , yuppie wrote:
That's not the only audience. I as a developer consult CHANGES.txt
to (hopefully) find *all* changes on the respective branch or on
the trunk that have flowed into it until now.
Can't developers use the subversion history?
It's much quicker to
On Jun 18, 2008, at 19:32 , Fred Drake wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:27 PM, yuppie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sorry. I was referring to the current Zope 2 (and CMF) policy:
Note that you don't need to note the fix in the CHANGES.txt on the
trunk if
you don't want to. At the time a new
On Jun 15, 2008, at 06:09 , Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 15. Juni 2008 06:04:37 -0500 Jens Vagelpohl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO seeing some caching-related issues in exchange
for enjoying a redundantly configured caching tier is a good
tradeoff for
the current site.
The current
Hi guys,
Are there any basic problems using z3c.form with Zope 2? All the
tutorials and documentation I have found uses straight Zope 3. If
anyone has successfully used z3c.form in a Zope 2 project I'd love to
see some sample code ;-)
jens
On Jun 13, 2008, at 10:18 , robert rottermann wrote:
Hi there,
after the dislocation of the zope servers zope.org is reachable
again from where I am (switzerland)
however it is not possible to download anything.
The Zope Corp sysadmins and Jim are aware of the problems and working
on
The zope.org-related servers and services maintained by Zope
Corporation will be moving to a new home late Thursday night Eastern
Standard Time.
What services are affected?
---
The most important service addresses include...
- www.zope.org
- svn.zope.org
-
On Jun 11, 2008, at 06:05 , Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 01:22:18AM -0500, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
The zope.org-related servers and services maintained by Zope
Corporation
will be moving to a new home late Thursday night Eastern Standard
Time.
How long will the outage
The zope.org-related servers and services maintained by Zope
Corporation will be moving to a new home late Thursday night Eastern
Standard Time.
What services are affected?
---
The most important service addresses include...
- www.zope.org
- svn.zope.org
-
The zope.org-related servers and services maintained by Zope
Corporation will be moving to a new home late Thursday night Eastern
Standard Time.
What services are affected?
---
The most important service addresses include...
- www.zope.org
- svn.zope.org
-
On May 28, 2008, at 02:25 , Christian Theune wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 02:31:04PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
Did you try setting up a download cache and putting it there? Note
that
if you had a download cache named foo, you would need to put the
tar
ball in foo/dist.
I could and
Hi guys,
Does zc.buildout and/or the default egg recipe have any way of
overriding the download URL from the cheese shop if that URL is broken
and I cannot reach the package maintainer?
Thanks!
jens
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
On May 27, 2008, at 12:49 , Jim Fulton wrote:
On May 27, 2008, at 1:42 PM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Hi guys,
Does zc.buildout and/or the default egg recipe have any way of
overriding the download URL from the cheese shop if that URL is
broken and I cannot reach the package maintainer
On May 27, 2008, at 13:31 , Jim Fulton wrote:
Did you try setting up a download cache and putting it there? Note
that if you had a download cache named foo, you would need to put
the tar ball in foo/dist.
Haven't tried that yet.
jens
___
On May 23, 2008, at 11:49 , Jon Emmons wrote:
Another thought I had, is that Zope has only one python interpreter
running,
pretty much forcing all processing to be serial by default given
what you've
just said.
Sorry, that's all baloney. Just like blindly hiking the number of
threads or
On Apr 30, 2008, at 12:41 , Christian Theune wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:16:53PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I'm trying to figure out what the current state of the art for
monitoring Zope2 processes is. Ideally I'ld want the equivalent of
zc.z3monitor.
I figured the medua
On Apr 18, 2008, at 14:09 , Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 18 April 2008, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
There is still an ongoing debate about that even - the extjs authors
basically only want to offer LGPL to you if you meet certain criteria
but won't allow you to redistribute it with just
On Apr 17, 2008, at 12:27 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Opinions, votes?
+1
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
On Apr 14, 2008, at 19:11 , Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
*IF* you'd like to be pragmatic, I'd suggest we clean up those
failing Plone tests, merge the branch and be on our way.
+1
jens
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
On Apr 7, 2008, at 00:20 , Alexander Limi wrote:
- Try not to be too clever with the Taste/Get and other links.
People actually scan for links that are similar from other projects,
and having to interpret/understand them is confusing.
+1
- The list of companies using Zope includes
On Apr 7, 2008, at 11:23 , vaibhav pol wrote:
Thanks alot
but i am not using command but i using perl function to modify the
passwd and shadow file. in my module that's why i want to invoke
that module as root
There's a few things seriously wrong with your plan:
- you want to create a
On Apr 7, 2008, at 12:18 , Chris Withers wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
- doing Perl methods or external methods in Zope has been
deprecated years and years ago. You will have a hard time finding
anyone to support that.
I'm guessing you mean perl external methods rather than all external
On Apr 5, 2008, at 17:52 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
Then, we need a champion for each of the sub-projects. These are:
- Zope 3 and the Zope Libraries -- this is the most important one
in
the short term!
- Zope 2
- CMF
- ZODB
I'm volunteering for the CMF.
jens
On Apr 2, 2008, at 11:11 , Allen Schmidt Sr. wrote:
Thanks Chris.
Seeing tons of squid messages about the new msnbotand it is not
following our robots.txt directive. In fact, I have even disallowed
it completely and it still goes where it wants. And the updated
version was supposed to
On Mar 26, 2008, at 01:12 , Timothy Selivanow wrote:
I would rather have a package that upstream approves of and
participates
in, than blindly create it in a silo not caring. It never turns out
well in the long run with the latter.
You may be fighting windmills here. Previous attempts at
On Mar 26, 2008, at 11:19 , Yuri wrote:
Hi!
I've got a trouble importing a ZClass app to 2.9.8 from 2.6.1.
IMHO you're not investing your time wisely trying to make a ZClas
application work on a later Zope version. They're unsupported and
dead. I would keep the old setup running and
On Mar 26, 2008, at 12:59 , Allen Schmidt Sr. wrote:
That sounds so easy. We have one ZClass but it is the basis of
almost our entire newspaper website. The news ZClass was built in
2000 and put into production when we went live on Zope in Feb 2001
(just before the guys at Zope Corp said
On Mar 26, 2008, at 15:40 , David Bear wrote:
Is it possible to have one zeo client running in debug mode while
another is
not? It seems that it should be the way most people would make a
development
environment. One zeo is running in standard mode so you could see
how the
site performs --
On Mar 26, 2008, at 16:19 , Yuri wrote:
On Mar 26, 2008, at 11:19 , Yuri wrote:
Hi!
I've got a trouble importing a ZClass app to 2.9.8 from 2.6.1.
IMHO you're not investing your time wisely trying to make a ZClas
application work on a later Zope version. They're unsupported and
On Mar 26, 2008, at 17:55 , Simon Michael wrote:
ZEO clients connecting to one and the same ZEO database server then
that's pretty dangerous.
It is ? Yikes.
I believe you, as I remember this working for a while and then
giving zodb errors requiring a restart. I wonder why ?
I wouldn't
On Mar 10, 2008, at 17:57 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Tres Seaver wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
Also, some variety of doctest would be nice. Even when a package is
not using doctests, I add new tests as doctest unless there's a
really
good reason not to.
Becuase they make for poor
On Mar 5, 2008, at 12:38 , Miles wrote:
Hi,
I'm hoping someone can share their experience of using repozo,
packing and backups to answer a couple of questions.
I've googled around to confirm that packing means a full backup. Is
there any way to carry out incremental backups and then
On Feb 22, 2008, at 17:52 , Andreas Jung wrote:
Hi,
I (and some co-workers) encountered lately issues with traversal
when running scripts using zopectl run from the command line. The
lookup
code fore views apparently expects always the existence of a REQUEST.
What's the best approach to
On Feb 11, 2008, at 15:03 , Chris Withers wrote:
Josef Meile wrote:
Somebody didn't like the bots to roam the archives?
I have a feeling someone didn't want bots spanking some web-
subversion front end that's running, but the end result is that we
loose all Zope code and mailing list
301 - 400 of 1121 matches
Mail list logo
