Hi Christopher,
Great pointers, thank you very much for your response!
I use pound for load balancing (from the beginning - nothing changed here).
I will investigate using your indications.
Thanks again,
Dragos
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Christopher Lozinski <
lozin...@freerecruiting.com>
On 11/5/15 12:29 PM, Dragos Chirila wrote:
> My impression is that the save itself is handled by lets say client1
> and then the redirect and render of the edit page by a different one -
> client2.
I don't know what is going on, but let me ask a few obvious questions.
How do you assign web reque
Hi there,
I have in production a Zope server from many years now:
- Zope 2.11.4-final, python 2.4.6
- 2.4.6
- ZEO with 3 clients via sockets on the same machine
- running a custom CMS (not Plone based)
Last weekend, without touching the server or the code, a strange problem
starting to occur and
Hi Sebastian,
Am 06.05.2015 um 15:26 schrieb Sebastian Tänzer:
> After further testing I was able to sort this one out by downgrading
ZopeUndo to 2.12.0 (pip install ZopeUndo==2.12.0 --force —upgrade).
> PyPi only said 4.0 brought Py3 compability. Should I expect any
problems using ZopeUndo 2.
After further testing I was able to sort this one out by downgrading ZopeUndo
to 2.12.0 (pip install ZopeUndo==2.12.0 --force —upgrade).
PyPi only said 4.0 brought Py3 compability. Should I expect any problems using
ZopeUndo 2.12 + ZEO/ZODB4/ZODB3 with their latest versions?
Best, Sebastian
> A
After more „research“ I see that the ZMS3 pip packages uses completely
different versions that don’t seem to be compatible with ZEO (at least Undo is
not working). I’m aware „undo“ is not a really used feature at all as revisions
most of the time are beeing implemented by products. My only fear
Good morning all,
after further testing we noticed our Zope2 virtualenv setup was done with the
ZMS3 (CMS) install routine using pip install ZMS3 --process-dependency-links.
This installed different package versions.
The original pip Zope2 uses these versions: http://pastebin.com/ZEwhVba0
The Z
thanks for the „shot“, yet disabling IPv6 locally on the VM does not help, same
error:
(server):
2015-05-06T10:05:51 INFO ZEO.StorageServer (127.0.0.1:44833) disconnected
--
2015-05-06T10:05:51 INFO ZEO.zrpc.Connection('S') (127.0.0.1:44835) received
handshake 'Z3101'
--
2015-05-06T10:0
Am 6. Mai 2015 01:24:50 MESZ, schrieb "Sebastian Tänzer" :
>2015-05-06 01:16:46 WARNING ZEO.zrpc (19205) CW: error connecting to
>('::1', ): ECONNREFUSED
>2015-05-06 01:16:46 INFO ZEO.ClientStorage zeostorage Testing
>connection
>2015-05-06 01:16:46 INFO ZEO.zrpc.Connection('C') (127.0.0.1:999
Hello once more,
I’m running a fresh Zope2 ZEO setup (pip install
--index-url=http://download.zope.org/Zope2/index/2.13.22/ Zope2 and pip install
zope.mkzeoinstance) inside a virtualenv setup.
As said: No products, fresh setup, happens with any object. Going to any undo
tab produces this error
Hello,
I am working on a solution that has a very high number of users and a
significant amount of traffic. Using a zeo configuration we have been running
into a few bottle necks while trying to improve our load testing results. The
problem we see is if that put our Zeo Configuration under lo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gaute Amundsen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 03:57 -0500, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> The ZEO client cache is a disk-based cache, separate from the RAM-based
>> cache used by any ZODB connection. It doesn't use RAM, per se, except
>> for an in-memory inde
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 03:57 -0500, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Gaute Amundsen wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > What's the difference between the to cache-size settings here?
> > I've not been able to find a good description to guide me in finding the
> > right va
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gaute Amundsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> What's the difference between the to cache-size settings here?
> I've not been able to find a good description to guide me in finding the
> right values.
>
>
> mount-point /
> cache-size 1 1.
>
>
Hi
What's the difference between the to cache-size settings here?
I've not been able to find a good description to guide me in finding the
right values.
mount-point /
cache-size 1 1.
server foo:9080
storage main
name zeostorage
var $INSTANCE/var
cache
+---[ Mikael Kermorgant ]--
| Hello,
|
| We're using a zope 2.10 setup with a zeo server and several zeo clients behind
| lvs.
|
| Sometimes, we'd like to track which zeo client handled teh request, and we're
| going to need it as we'd like to proove that ha-proxy handles
Hello,
We're using a zope 2.10 setup with a zeo server and several zeo clients
behind lvs.
Sometimes, we'd like to track which zeo client handled teh request, and
we're going to need it as we'd like to proove that ha-proxy handles session
persistance.
Is there a way to add a header in the http r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Analog Kid wrote:
> I have a zeo setup which has one zeo server (say s1) and 5 zeo clients (say
> c1 through c5). All of these clients share a single Data.fs. Now, I need a
> zeo server (say s2) between just some of the zeo clients (say c1 and c2).
>
Hi All:
I have a zeo setup which has one zeo server (say s1) and 5 zeo clients (say
c1 through c5). All of these clients share a single Data.fs. Now, I need a
zeo server (say s2) between just some of the zeo clients (say c1 and c2).
all of these instances should share just one Dafa.fs file. Is thi
Jean Jordaan wrote at 2008-8-13 12:26 +0700:
>We have a server running many ZEO clusters (many more than the number of
>CPUs, of course). Each cluster consists of a master and two clients.
>
>Would it make sense to run both clients and spread requests across them?
Usually, this would make sense wh
--On 13. August 2008 12:26:28 +0700 Jean Jordaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi there
We have a server running many ZEO clusters (many more than the number of
CPUs, of course). Each cluster consists of a master and two clients.
Would it make sense to run both clients and spread requests acr
Hi there
We have a server running many ZEO clusters (many more than the number of
CPUs, of course). Each cluster consists of a master and two clients.
Would it make sense to run both clients and spread requests across them?
Or would it be better to just increase the number of threads of a single
--On 22. April 2008 15:16:55 -0700 David Bear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to find more documentation about all the configuration
parameters for a zeo.conf
Namely, I have a zope with multiple zodb's and mount points. I am trying
to learn how to migration a single zope instance with m
David Bear schrieb:
I'm trying to find more documentation about all the configuration
parameters for a zeo.conf
I *believe* on plope.org there was an introduction to it with some more
parameters explained.
Namely, I have a zope with multiple zodb's and mount points. I am trying
to learn how
I'm trying to find more documentation about all the configuration parameters
for a zeo.conf
Namely, I have a zope with multiple zodb's and mount points. I am trying to
learn how to migration a single zope instance with multiple mounts into zeo.
One thing I don't understand is temporary storage. If
FuBuJo wrote at 2008-3-14 22:06 +:
> ...
>I thought putting Apache in front of Zope was very common (using VirtualHost
>Monster) - guess not.
This is common. But, usually, a ZEO client is not abbreviated as "ZEO".
"ZEO" usually means the ZEO server.
> ...
>It's the python process on the Zeo
FuBuJo schrieb:
> I apologize that my description was so confusing.
> I appreciate the feedback and so would like to clarify.
>
> The diagram is how the traffic flows. So we have:
> Step 1 - a Load Balancer that passes traffic to Apache
>
> Step 2 - Apache which uses mod_proxy to obfuscate the U
I apologize that my description was so confusing.
I appreciate the feedback and so would like to clarify.
The diagram is how the traffic flows. So we have:
Step 1 - a Load Balancer that passes traffic to Apache
Step 2 - Apache which uses mod_proxy to obfuscate the URL and proxies traffic to
the
the one executing Zope?
> Then when
>traffic is removed from the ZEO instance ... the system remains CPU bound by
>the
>python process ... and you have to bounce Zope(Zeo instance) and Apache to free
>it.
Which system? The one running ZEO (the ZEO server) or the one running
Zope?
>Th
Hello. I've thumbed through the list for Zope Zeo performance issues similar to
mine - but have found a lot of conflicting information - so I thought I'd ask
(and keep reading and experimenting).
Zope - 2.7.x (Zeo) Apache 2.x Zope is using Plone (2.0.x)
Basically I have a high tra
Ricardo Newbery wrote at 2008-1-29 22:56 -0800:
> ...
>Another related question. With respect to conflict resolution, is is
>safe to assume that products (with _p_resolveConflict methods) in the
>main Zope products directory are already available to the ZEO server
>without any special config
On Jan 29, 2008, at 1:19 AM, Ricardo Newbery wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008, at 10:39 AM, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Zope uses Python import magic to make packages available
in "INSTANCE_HOME/Products" as additional products in
the "Products" package.
If some of these products need application spec
Occasionally, someone asks whether Solaris is an adequate platform
for Zope/ZEO deployment.
Up to now, I answered to those questions -- we are using Solaris
in our backend and up to now we did not see problems.
This changed a few days ago -- we met an incredible limitation
in Solaris: the number
Bengt Giger wrote at 2007-4-10 15:36 +0200:
>with our new ZEO client systems, we frequently observe this problem:
>
>a ZEO process starts to use 100% CPU time (user) without a significant
>increase of requests. Sometimes (but not always) the process stops answering
>requests, still using 100% CPU.
Hi
with our new ZEO client systems, we frequently observe this problem:
a ZEO process starts to use 100% CPU time (user) without a significant
increase of requests. Sometimes (but not always) the process stops answering
requests, still using 100% CPU.
When we kill such a process, it changes to z
I have posted this several times, but have not until now been able to
get DeadlockDebugger installed.
zope 2.9.5 + zeo
pythonm2.4.3
Red Hat RHEL 4
Plone 2.5.1
Our zeo clients hang intermittently. We have no way of reproducing the
problem, but it occurs daily. The client hangs and a resta
cristopher pierson ewing, on 2007-01-23:
> I've been told that zope is not set up to utilize the extra processing
> power of multiproc machines. I have a new intel x-serve with the
> dual-core dual-proc setup, and want to get the most I can out of zope.
> I've read a few articles that mention r
--On 23. Januar 2007 09:24:56 -0800 cristopher pierson ewing
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been told that zope is not set up to utilize the extra processing
power of multiproc machines. I have a new intel x-serve with the
dual-core dual-proc setup, and want to get the most I can out of zo
I've been told that zope is not set up to utilize the extra processing
power of multiproc machines. I have a new intel x-serve with the
dual-core dual-proc setup, and want to get the most I can out of zope.
I've read a few articles that mention running more than one zope process
as zeo clients
- Original Message -
From: "ian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jonathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope] Zeo question
Ola,
You can easily do this by changing the 'display' routines on ea
Ola,
You can easily do this by changing the 'display' routines on each zope
instance
I feel so stupid asking but what do you mean by this...i have googled
but cannot find anything about 'zope display routines' ...
Do you mean this:
In the zope instances I can create a folder custom and place
> auaua...i didn't know that ;)...this is really cool. Now the
> inevitable question - 'Is there any documentation about how to set
> this up ?'
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/HowtoRunAZEOServer/howto.html
http://plope.com/Books/2_7Edition/ZEO.stx
and one more interesting thing:
http://longsleep.
- Original Message -
From: "ian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jonathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Maciej Wisniowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 7:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope] Zeo question
Ola,
thx maciej and
Ola,
thx maciej and Jonathan...your answers have helped a lot
Each zope instance can access multiple ZODB's (as Maciej mentions
later), which means that the zope instance can access both a shared zodb
and a local zodb which is specific to the zope instance.
auaua...i didn't know that ;)...thi
- Original Message -
From: "Maciej Wisniowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope] Zeo question
2. I can create a custom skin on each zope (in reality plone) instance
r
> 2. I can create a custom skin on each zope (in reality plone) instance
> right or is each zope instance is just a mirror of the other?
Nope. It is something different. In general ZEO is about sharing ZODB
(Zope Object Database) between few Zope instances. There is no mirroring
but just one ZODB.
Hi,
Hope you can help
1. I am having trouble connecting a zope client to a zeo database.The
server and client are in different goegraphical locations and behind
different proxies and firewalls. I read that they communicate using a
'custom RPC protocol'...what does this mean and does it have any
the same URL jump to the other Zope/ZEO client and same thing
happens there. Another few reloads and one user has effectively crashed
the siteuntil the threads clear themselves out. Usually is a catalog
search for a news article or something spanning our 6 years of online
news articles
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 07:32:38AM +0200, Maciej Wisniowski wrote:
>
> >
> >zope 2.8.5 + zeo
> >python 2.3.4 (red hat distribution)
> >Red Hat RHEL 4
> >Plone 2.1.2
> >
> >Our zeo clients hang intermittently. We have no way of reproducing the
> >problem, but it occurs daily. The client hangs and
zope 2.8.5 + zeo
python 2.3.4 (red hat distribution)
Red Hat RHEL 4
Plone 2.1.2
Our zeo clients hang intermittently. We have no way of reproducing the
problem, but it occurs daily. The client hangs and a restart seems to
fix the
problem.
Install DeadlockDebugger and you'll be able to see
Hello,We have been having problem with our production servers. We currently have:zope 2.8.5 + zeopython 2.3.4 (red hat distribution)Red Hat RHEL 4Plone 2.1.2Our zeo clients hang intermittently. We have no way of reproducing the problem, but it occurs daily. The client hangs and a restart seem
Hello,
We have been having problem with our production servers. We currently have:
zope 2.8.5 + zeo
pythonm2.3.4
Red Hat RHEL 4
Plone 2.1.2
Our zeo clients hang intermittently. We have no way of reproducing the
problem, but it occurs daily. The client hangs and a restart seems to fix the
pr
Title: Re: [Zope] ZEO and Data.fs
No, you just need to change zope.conf to move from FileStorage to ClientStorage, and then you can move your Data.fs file to ZEO var directory and start zeo.
Pascal
De : "Sinang, Danny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date : Mon, 18 Sep 2006
--On 18. September 2006 21:38:48 +0800 "Sinang, Danny"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
We're currently not using ZEO, but may do so in the future.
Question is, do we need to export or convert our Data.fs to a
ZEO-capable format ?
No, just create a new ZEO instance and copy over the Dat
Hello,
We're currently not
using ZEO, but may do so in the future.
Question is, do we
need to export or convert our Data.fs to a ZEO-capable format
?
Regards,
Danny
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/
Jens Vagelpohl wrote at 2006-9-14 15:50 +0200:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>On 14 Sep 2006, at 15:34, Jonathan wrote:
Yes: a single zeo server can deal with multiple storages (ie. a
storage can contain mount points to other storages)
>>>
>>> That's misleading wo
Brian Brinegar wrote at 2006-9-13 21:22 -0400:
> ... partioning large data sets onto different storages ...
>First off, does this make any sense?
I makes sense and we do it successfully with our large editorial
system.
However, ensure that each storage is self contained data wise:
e.g. do not
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Vagelpohl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[Zope] List Mailing"
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope] ZEO with Multiple Storages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14 Sep 2006, at 13:5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14 Sep 2006, at 15:34, Jonathan wrote:
Yes: a single zeo server can deal with multiple storages (ie. a
storage can contain mount points to other storages)
That's misleading wording, a storage knows nothing at all about
mounts. The storage
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Vagelpohl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[Zope] List Mailing"
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope] ZEO with Multiple Storages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14 Sep 2006, at 13:5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14 Sep 2006, at 13:56, Jonathan wrote:
Yes: a single zeo server can deal with multiple storages (ie. a
storage can contain mount points to other storages)
That's misleading wording, a storage knows nothing at all about
mounts. The storage s
- Original Message -
From: "Martijn Pieters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jonathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Brian Brinegar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 2:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope] ZEO with Multiple Storages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14 Sep 2006, at 08:54, Martijn Pieters wrote:
One ZEO server can deal with multiple storages just fine. Transactions
involving multiple storages commit just fine.
Caveat: You buy nothing by having a single ZEO process serve several
ZODBs when
On 9/14/06, Jonathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you mean having zope commit a single transaction to multiple storages,
then 'vanilla' zope won't do it (Zope Corp has a commercial product called
ZRS which does this type of thing).
No, that's not true. ZRS is used to create hot read-only or st
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Brinegar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 9:22 PM
Subject: [Zope] ZEO with Multiple Storages
We currently have a ZEO environment with FileStorage (data.fs) over 100
gigs, which continues to grow.
We currently have a ZEO environment with FileStorage (data.fs) over 100
gigs, which continues to grow. Currently we are approaching a major
hardware and software upgrade. All new hardware and moving from Zope 2.6
to Zope 2.9.
Our server hosts sites for several different schools and departments
--On 2. September 2006 12:15:47 -0400 beno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
address 8100
and that your zeo server is running on the ip address specified in the
entry in zope.conf
That's logical. Why does zeo need its own port?
Because every kind of network service needs its own port.
-aj
Jonathan wrote:
I got this working by changing the following in zope.conf:
server localhost:7080
to
server 202.71.106.119:
Apparently, it needs its own port?
TIA,
beno
You need to make sure that the entry in your zeo client config file
(zope.conf)
eg
server 194.123.123.123:8100
- Original Message -
From: "beno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope] ZEO Problem
I got this working by changing the following in zope.conf:
server localhost:7080
to
server 202.71.106.119:
Apparently,
02, 2006 9:24 AM
Subject: [Zope] ZEO Problem
Hi;
I'm reading the Plone book. It states that for Zope 2.7 (I have 2.78)
ZEO is built in by default but must be instantiated thus:
cd /opt/Zope-2/7/bin
./mkzeoinstance /var/zeo
or some such code. So I tried this:
cd /usr/local/zope/278/b
- Original Message -
From: "beno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 9:24 AM
Subject: [Zope] ZEO Problem
Hi;
I'm reading the Plone book. It states that for Zope 2.7 (I have 2.78) ZEO
is built in by default but must be instantiated thu
Hi;
I'm reading the Plone book. It states that for Zope 2.7 (I have 2.78)
ZEO is built in by default but must be instantiated thus:
cd /opt/Zope-2/7/bin
./mkzeoinstance /var/zeo
or some such code. So I tried this:
cd /usr/local/zope/278/bin
./mkzeoinstance.py ../../instance2/var/zeo
where 27
Gerhard Schmidt wrote at 2006-8-8 08:06 +0200:
> ... long time commit locks ...
>To understand this can you tell me when a transaction is started and when
>its closed. Does the Zeo server wait until all data is recieved bevor the
>transaction is started or does the transaktion start when the data
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:09:56PM +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Gerhard Schmidt wrote at 2006-8-7 15:54 +0200:
> > ...
> >2006-08-07T14:29:19 INFO ZEO.StorageServer (97002/10.152.64.23:52518)
> >Transaction
> >+blocked waiting for storage. Clients waiting: 1.
> > ...
> >2006-08-07T14:29:50 INFO ZE
Gerhard Schmidt wrote at 2006-8-7 15:54 +0200:
> ...
>2006-08-07T14:29:19 INFO ZEO.StorageServer (97002/10.152.64.23:52518)
>Transaction
>+blocked waiting for storage. Clients waiting: 1.
> ...
>2006-08-07T14:29:50 INFO ZEO.StorageServer (97002/10.152.64.17:54463) Blocked
>transaction restarted.
HI,
we have quite a Problem with out Zope/Zeo system. We run at the moment
Zope cluster with 10 application servers and a zeo server with
Filestorage. Our Data.fs is 3.5 Gig at the moment (after Pack).
I runs most of the time without problem. But sometimes things screw up
2006-08-07T14:29:19
Gerhard Schmidt wrote at 2006-5-3 08:20 +0200:
>On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:24:29PM +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote:
>> Gerhard Schmidt wrote at 2006-5-2 09:52 +0200:
>> > ...
>> >I try to reduce the load of the line between the backup Computing Center
>> >and the Mainsite by having a zeo server as Prox
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 2 May 2006, at 08:52, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
A configuration like that is described in the Zope Book on page 230.
I'd like to see that. The proxying you describe is simply not possible,
period.
He's decribing the dead tree version of the Zope Book. Either Amos or
M
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:24:29PM +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Gerhard Schmidt wrote at 2006-5-2 09:52 +0200:
> > ...
> >I try to reduce the load of the line between the backup Computing Center
> >and the Mainsite by having a zeo server as Proxy between the zope server
> >at the backup site an
Gerhard Schmidt wrote at 2006-5-2 09:52 +0200:
> ...
>I try to reduce the load of the line between the backup Computing Center
>and the Mainsite by having a zeo server as Proxy between the zope server
>at the backup site an the ZEO at the main site.
You will gain nothing -- as ZEO does not impl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2 May 2006, at 08:52, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
A configuration like that is described in the Zope Book on page 230.
I'd like to see that. The proxying you describe is simply not
possible, period.
As Andreas mentioned, the (commercial) ZRS pro
--On 2. Mai 2006 09:52:57 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A configuration like that is described in the Zope Book on page 230.
I can not see anything like that in the Zope Book 2.7 edition. As said
a ZEO client talks to a *ZEO server* and *not* to another *ZEO client*.
Any
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 08:51:12AM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
>
>
> --On 2. Mai 2006 08:31:17 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Hallo,
> >
> >I am trying to install a setup like shown below
> >
> >ZEO_M
> > | -- ZEO_B
> > | | -- ZOPE
> > | | -- ZOPE
> > | | -- ZOP
--On 2. Mai 2006 08:31:17 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hallo,
I am trying to install a setup like shown below
ZEO_M
| -- ZEO_B
| | -- ZOPE
| | -- ZOPE
| | -- ZOPE
| ...
| -- ZOPE
| -- ZOPE
...
You are trying to create a cascade of multiple ZEO C
Hallo,
I am trying to install a setup like shown below
ZEO_M
| -- ZEO_B
| | -- ZOPE
| | -- ZOPE
| | -- ZOPE
| ...
| -- ZOPE
| -- ZOPE
...
The ZEO_B should be a zeoclient of the ZEO_M (MainZEO). The reason for
this setup ist that the ZEO_B is located in a backup comput
Hi there,
One of my clients is using Plone on Solaris 9. We have set up one ZEO
client on a Solaris machine and a ZEO server on another Solaris machine
(for testing purposes only at this stage).
Performance is great but every morning, the first hit to the Plone site
returns a ClientDisconnec
Dennis Allison wrote:
2006-02-06T14:07:20 INFO ZPublisher.Conflict ConflictError at
:
database conflict error (oid 0x086e, class BTrees._OOBTree.OOBTree, serial
this txn started with 0x03633ca95f75e900 2006-02-06 22:01:22.373575,
serial currently committed 0x03633caf59114244 2006-02-06 22:07:2
Dennis Allison wrote at 2006-2-7 18:18 -0800:
> ...
>What sort of Zope failure can cause this sort of behavior? What's the
>best approach to get more information to localize the failure.
A crash presented to Zope as a fatal signal (usually "SIGSEGV"
or "SIGBUS").
Reconfigure your Linux account
Arh...
I forgot that internal logging levels override.
Still, you'd think something that triggers a crash would have a level
higher than info. Careful examination of the trace log shows nothing.
I'll fix the log level & see if that turns anything up.
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Paul Winkler wrote
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 06:18:49PM -0800, Dennis Allison wrote:
>
> Zope 2.9.0
> Python 2.4.2
> Amd dual Opteron
> Linux
>
> I am seeing occasional (several per day) Zope crashes under load. The
> event.log immediately before and after the crash looks like:
>
>
> 2006-02-06T14:07:20 INFO ZPu
Zope 2.9.0
Python 2.4.2
Amd dual Opteron
Linux
I am seeing occasional (several per day) Zope crashes under load. The
event.log immediately before and after the crash looks like:
2006-02-06T14:07:20 INFO ZPublisher.Conflict ConflictError at
:
database conflict error (oid 0x086e, class BTree
On Feb 3, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Paul Winkler wrote:
If I were in your shoes the first thing I'd do is bump up the log
levels
on both zope and zeo to BLATHER. Adds overhead I know, but you
need to find
the problem somehow... it's a weird one, I've never seen zope
restart "for no reason".
This
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 08:35:11AM -0800, Dennis Allison wrote:
> Timing correlates to the second. Zope and ZEO live on the
> same physical box.
OK. Do you have more than one ZEO client? If not,
I'd reevaluate whether you need ZEO at all.
(It's great for zopectl debug on a live sys
9.0
> >
> > We are seeing spontaneous restarts of Zope with no indication in any of
> > the standard Zope logs. Looking at the ZEO log indicates that the
> > restarts of Zope are due to a lost connection between Zope & ZEO but
> > with no other informati
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 01:00:45AM -0800, Dennis Allison wrote:
>
> Zope 2.9.0
>
> We are seeing spontaneous restarts of Zope with no indication in any of
> the standard Zope logs. Looking at the ZEO log indicates that the
> restarts of Zope are due to a lost connection betw
Zope 2.9.0
We are seeing spontaneous restarts of Zope with no indication in any of
the standard Zope logs. Looking at the ZEO log indicates that the
restarts of Zope are due to a lost connection between Zope & ZEO but
with no other information. The logging level is set at the distribu
Sascha
Ottolski
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 11:40 AM
To: zope@zope.org
Subject: Re: [Zope] ZEO client authentication
Am Montag, 3. Oktober 2005 14:44 schrieb Mika, David P (Research):
> I see that ZEO supports a simple digest authenitcation of clients and that
> this is set in the zeo
Mika, David P (Research) wrote:
I see that ZEO supports a simple digest authenitcation of clients and that this
is set in the zeo's config file with the keys: authentication-protocol,
authentication-database and authentication-realm.
Further, I can see that a client can connect using e.g. ZEO.
Am Montag, 3. Oktober 2005 14:44 schrieb Mika, David P (Research):
> I see that ZEO supports a simple digest authenitcation of clients and that
> this is set in the zeo's config file with the keys:
> authentication-protocol, authentication-database and authentication-realm.
>
> Further, I can see t
I see that ZEO supports a simple digest authenitcation of clients and that this
is set in the zeo's config file with the keys: authentication-protocol,
authentication-database and authentication-realm.
Further, I can see that a client can connect using e.g. ZEO.ClientStorage with
arguments for
1 - 100 of 199 matches
Mail list logo