spdx-tech  

Messages by Thread

• [spdx-tech] Reminder: SPDX tech call in 30 minutes Kate Stewart
• [spdx-tech] Agenda: SPDX tech meeting 2020/4/7 Kate Stewart
• [spdx-tech] Agenda for 3/31 Tech Meeting Kate Stewart
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Agenda for 3/31 Tech Meeting Kate Stewart
• Re: [spdx-tech] About new plofile for SPDX 3.0 Alexios Zavras
• Re: [spdx-tech] GSoc Project : Implement SPDX License Matching in Python - Looking to contribute Desikan Sundararajan
  • Re: [spdx-tech] GSoc Project : Implement SPDX License Matching in Python - Looking to contribute Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Preview of SPDX 3.0 Kate Stewart
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Preview of SPDX 3.0 David Kemp
• [spdx-tech] Agenda for 3/24 Tech Meeting Kate Stewart
• [spdx-tech] Questions about SPDX spec for container images Nisha Kumar via Lists.Spdx.Org
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Questions about SPDX spec for container images Jeremiah C. Foster
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Questions about SPDX spec for container images Nisha Kumar via Lists.Spdx.Org
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Questions about SPDX spec for container images Kate Stewart
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Questions about SPDX spec for container images Gary O'Neall
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Questions about SPDX spec for container images Nisha Kumar via Lists.Spdx.Org
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Questions about SPDX spec for container images Gary O'Neall
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Questions about SPDX spec for container images Gary O'Neall
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Questions about SPDX spec for container images Nisha Kumar via Lists.Spdx.Org
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Questions about SPDX spec for container images William Bartholomew
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Questions about SPDX spec for container images Jeremiah C. Foster
• [spdx-tech] Request for review of 2.2 SPDX XML example Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] No activity in Tools-python repository ANSHUL DUTT SHARMA
• XML Validation -- RE: [spdx-tech] Invitation: SPDX tech team meeting @ Weekly from 12pm to 1pm on Tuesday (CDT) ([email protected]) hutch
  • Re: XML Validation -- RE: [spdx-tech] Invitation: SPDX tech team meeting @ Weekly from 12pm to 1pm on Tuesday (CDT) ([email protected]) Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Minutes from 4 Feb 2020 tech call Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] GitHub Actions is alive! William Bartholomew
  • Re: [spdx-tech] GitHub Actions is alive! Kate Stewart
• [spdx-tech] SPDX 3.0 Specification Structure William Bartholomew
  • Re: [spdx-tech] SPDX 3.0 Specification Structure Jeremiah C. Foster
  • Re: [spdx-tech] SPDX 3.0 Specification Structure Kate Stewart
  • Re: [spdx-tech] SPDX 3.0 Specification Structure Kate Stewart
  • Re: [spdx-tech] SPDX 3.0 Specification Structure Steve Winslow
  • Re: [spdx-tech] SPDX 3.0 Specification Structure William Bartholomew
  • Re: [spdx-tech] SPDX 3.0 Specification Structure David Kemp
  • Re: [spdx-tech] SPDX 3.0 Specification Structure William Bartholomew
  • Re: [spdx-tech] SPDX 3.0 Specification Structure Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] GSoC Gary O'Neall
  • [spdx-tech] GSoC Josh Lin
  • Re: [spdx-tech] GSoC Sebastian Crane
  • Re: [spdx-tech] GSoC Alexios Zavras
  • [spdx-tech] GSoC hossameljendy
  • [spdx-tech] GSoC i10shivansh
• [spdx-tech] Reminder: GSoC projects page update Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] PR review request William Bartholomew
• [spdx-tech] [ANNOUNCE] Open source license compliance tooling meeting and hackathon on January 31st 2020 pre-FOSDEM fringe event in Bruxelles, Belgium Philippe Ombredanne
• [spdx-tech] Tech Meeting Agenda Kate Stewart
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Tech Meeting Agenda Nisha Kumar via Lists.Spdx.Org
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Tech Meeting Agenda Philippe Ombredanne
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Tech Meeting Agenda Peter Shin
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Tech Meeting Agenda Kate Stewart
• [spdx-tech] Project ideas and mentors for GSoC Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Agenda for tomorrow's tech call Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] SPDX Tech Call postponed until Jan 7 Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Tracking issue for SPDX 2.2 release William Bartholomew
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Tracking issue for SPDX 2.2 release Kate Stewart
• [spdx-tech] Subject conduymunoimay
• [spdx-tech] Minutes from 3 Dec joint tech/legal meeting Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Agenda for today's meeting Kate Stewart
• [spdx-tech] Tuesday SPDX tech call Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] [spdx] Seeking public comments for the OpenChain specification ISO format version 2.1 William Bartholomew
• Re: [spdx-tech] Updates to SPDX 3.0 Proposal William Bartholomew
• [spdx-tech] SPDX tech team meeting Kate Stewart
  • [spdx-tech] SPDX tech team meeting Kate Stewart
  • [spdx-tech] SPDX tech team meeting Kate Stewart
• [spdx-tech] Advice/guidance/input from the SPDX community for Arch Linux Santiago Torres Arias
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Advice/guidance/input from the SPDX community for Arch Linux William Bartholomew
• [spdx-tech] Reminder: Joint SPDX tech & legal call - in 1 hour. Kate Stewart
• [spdx-tech] Meeting Minutes from Tuesday's Call Gary O'Neall
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Meeting Minutes from Tuesday's Call William Bartholomew
• [spdx-tech] matching guidelines updates J Lovejoy
  • Re: [spdx-tech] matching guidelines updates Michael Dolan
  • Re: [spdx-tech] matching guidelines updates J Lovejoy
  • Re: [spdx-tech] matching guidelines updates William Bartholomew
  • Re: [spdx-tech] matching guidelines updates Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Tuesday's SPDX Tech Call Agenda Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Clean-up on the 2.2 pull requests Gary O'Neall
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Clean-up on the 2.2 pull requests William Bartholomew
• [spdx-tech] Minutes from tech call on 8 Oct 2018 Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Agenda for tech meeting: SPDX 3.0 planning Kate Stewart
• [spdx-tech] SPDX Tools Update Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Are there SPDX placeholders? michael . kaelbling
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Are there SPDX placeholders? Kate Stewart
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Are there SPDX placeholders? Steve Winslow
• [spdx-tech] Working with Python maintainers to adopt SPDX license expressions Philippe Ombredanne
• [spdx-tech] Proposed Changes to SPDX Spec GIT Manbeck, Jack via Lists.Spdx.Org
• [spdx-tech] Proposal to switch default branch on SPDX Spec repo to development/2.2 Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Canceling today's tech meeting Kate Stewart
• [spdx-tech] GSoC' 19 SPDX Specifications in PDF and HTML, Review nitishkumar81299
  • Re: [EXTERNAL] [spdx-tech] GSoC' 19 SPDX Specifications in PDF and HTML, Review Manbeck, Jack via Lists.Spdx.Org
  • Re: [spdx-tech] GSoC' 19 SPDX Specifications in PDF and HTML, Review Kate Stewart
• [spdx-tech] Did the meetings move to a new time? Nisha Kumar via Lists.Spdx.Org
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Did the meetings move to a new time? Manbeck, Jack via Lists.Spdx.Org
• [spdx-tech] Minutes from SPDX Tech calls Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Namespace meeting recording Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Minutes from joint legal tech call Gary O'Neall
• Re: [spdx-tech] [spdx] SPDX 2019 Survey - Ready for your thoughts - Let's collect data Phil Odence
• [spdx-tech] GSoC' 19 SPDX Specifications in PDF and HTML, HTML review nitishkumar81299
  • Re: [EXTERNAL] [spdx-tech] GSoC' 19 SPDX Specifications in PDF and HTML, HTML review Manbeck, Jack via Lists.Spdx.Org
  • [spdx-tech] GSoC' 19 SPDX Specifications in PDF and HTML, HTML review nitishkumar81299
• Re: [EXTERNAL] [spdx-tech] GSoC' 19 SPDX Specifications in PDF and HTML, HTML review Manbeck, Jack via Lists.Spdx.Org
  • Re: [EXTERNAL] [spdx-tech] GSoC' 19 SPDX Specifications in PDF and HTML, HTML review Kate Stewart
• Re: [spdx-tech] GSoC' !9 SPDX Specifications in PDF and HTML, PDF review Steve Winslow
• [spdx-tech] Invitation: Namespaces - next steps @ Thu Jul 18, 2019 11am - 12pm (CDT) ([email protected]) Kate Stewart
• [spdx-tech] Reminder: Joint monthly call between tech and legal at the top of the hour. Kate Stewart
• [spdx-tech] Invitation: SPDX tech team meeting @ Weekly from 12pm to 1pm on Tuesday (CDT) ([email protected]) Kate Stewart
• [spdx-tech] Project: Registry and repository of License List Namespaces Smith Tanjong Agbor
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Project: Registry and repository of License List Namespaces Smith Tanjong Agbor
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Project: Registry and repository of License List Namespaces J Lovejoy
• [spdx-tech] SPDX: use official license texts in spdx/license-list-data Vladimir Sitnikov
  • Re: [spdx-tech] SPDX: use official license texts in spdx/license-list-data Sebastian Schuberth
  • Re: [spdx-tech] SPDX: use official license texts in spdx/license-list-data Gary O'Neall
  • Re: [spdx-tech] SPDX: use official license texts in spdx/license-list-data Sebastian Schuberth
  • Re: [spdx-tech] SPDX: use official license texts in spdx/license-list-data Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined Vladimir Sitnikov
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined Gary O'Neall
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined Vladimir Sitnikov
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined David A. Wheeler
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined Vladimir Sitnikov
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined J Lovejoy
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined Vladimir Sitnikov
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined Alexios Zavras
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined Vladimir Sitnikov
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined Alexios Zavras
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined Vladimir Sitnikov
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined David A. Wheeler
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined Vladimir Sitnikov
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined David A. Wheeler
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined Vladimir Sitnikov
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined David A. Wheeler
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined Vladimir Sitnikov
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined David A. Wheeler
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined Philippe Ombredanne
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined Vladimir Sitnikov
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined Philippe Ombredanne
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined David A. Wheeler
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined Philippe Ombredanne
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined David A. Wheeler
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined Vladimir Sitnikov
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined David A. Wheeler
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined Gary O'Neall
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined Philippe Ombredanne
  • Re: [spdx-tech] "Or later" operator is not well defined David A. Wheeler
• [spdx-tech] Minutes from 21 May tech call Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] #spdx Demario Ford
• [spdx-tech] Reminder - SPDX tech call in 20 minutes Kate Stewart
• [spdx-tech] Tech team call for today (30 April 2019) cancelled Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Tech call reminder Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Minutes from today's tech call posted Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Reminder: SPDX Tech call in 15 minutes Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] SPDX License List version 3.5 now live J Lovejoy
• [spdx-tech] SPDX Tech call update - license namespace discussion Gary O'Neall
  • Re: [spdx-tech] SPDX Tech call update - license namespace discussion Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Reminder: using Zoom instead of uberconference for today's SPDX-tech meeting. Kate Stewart
• [spdx-tech] GSoC'2019 - SPDX Specification in PDF kamsang salima
• Re: [spdx-tech] [spdx] GSOC-2019 Krys Nuvadga
• [spdx-tech] Participation in GSoC 2019 xavierfigueroav
• [spdx-tech] Minutes for SPDX tech call 26 March 2019 Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Agenda for tech meeting today. Kate Stewart
  • Re: [EXTERNAL] [spdx-tech] Agenda for tech meeting today. Manbeck, Jack via Lists.Spdx.Org
  • Re: [EXTERNAL] [spdx-tech] Agenda for tech meeting today. Kate Stewart
• [spdx-tech] Markdown to Pdf IDEA nitishkumar81299
  • Re: [EXTERNAL] [spdx-tech] Markdown to Pdf IDEA Manbeck, Jack via Lists.Spdx.Org
• [spdx-tech] GSOC-2019 Hardik Sapra
• [spdx-tech] Minutes from Tuesday's tech call Gary O'Neall
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Minutes from Tuesday's tech call Alberto Pianon
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Minutes from Tuesday's tech call Steve Winslow
• [spdx-tech] add Hardik Sapra
• [spdx-tech] GSoC Project Nizar Benshaqi
  • Re: [spdx-tech] GSoC Project Gary O'Neall
  • Re: [spdx-tech] GSoC Project Nizar Benshaqi
  • Re: [spdx-tech] GSoC Project Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] FW: [spdx] announcing: Open Source Compliance Handbook Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] 2 Additional project ideas for GSoC Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] SPDX GSOC Proposal - Additional Format Support for the Python Libraries Anunay Aatipamula
• [spdx-tech] SPDX-tech call today cancelled. Kate Stewart
  • [spdx-tech] SPDX-tech call today cancelled. Kate Stewart
• [spdx-tech] FW: GSoC 2019: SPDX (Software Product Data Exchange) has been accepted as a mentor organization! garysourceauditor
• [spdx-tech] GSoC 19 - Additional Format Support for the Python Libraries satyamsaxena197
• [spdx-tech] An example of a super simple SPDX licenses registry, for discussion Philippe Ombredanne
  • Re: [spdx-tech] An example of a super simple SPDX licenses registry, for discussion J Lovejoy
  • Re: [spdx-tech] An example of a super simple SPDX licenses registry, for discussion Philippe Ombredanne
  • Re: [spdx-tech] An example of a super simple SPDX licenses registry, for discussion via Lists.Spdx.Org
  • Re: [spdx-tech] An example of a super simple SPDX licenses registry, for discussion Richard Fontana
  • Re: [spdx-tech] An example of a super simple SPDX licenses registry, for discussion Philippe Ombredanne
  • Re: [spdx-tech] An example of a super simple SPDX licenses registry, for discussion Philippe Ombredanne
  • Re: [spdx-tech] An example of a super simple SPDX licenses registry, for discussion J Lovejoy
  • Re: [spdx-tech] An example of a super simple SPDX licenses registry, for discussion Philippe Ombredanne
  • Re: [spdx-tech] An example of a super simple SPDX licenses registry, for discussion J Lovejoy
• [spdx-tech] Mentorship for GSOC Project #spdx Kumar Saurabh
  • Re: [spdx-tech] Mentorship for GSOC Project #spdx Gary O'Neall
• Re: [spdx-tech] [spdx] Mentorship for GSOC Project J Lovejoy
• [spdx-tech] No SPDX tech call today Kate Stewart
  • [spdx-tech] No SPDX tech call today Gary O'Neall
• [spdx-tech] Minutes from 6 Feb 2019 tech call Gary O'Neall
• Re: [spdx-tech] A proposal for SPDX Private License Identifiers. Example: .com.amazon.-.ASL-2.0 Gary O'Neall
  • Re: [spdx-tech] A proposal for SPDX Private License Identifiers. Example: .com.amazon.-.ASL-2.0 Alexios Zavras
  • Re: [spdx-tech] A proposal for SPDX Private License Identifiers. Example: .com.amazon.-.ASL-2.0 Kate Stewart
  • Re: [spdx-tech] A proposal for SPDX Private License Identifiers. Example: .com.amazon.-.ASL-2.0 Gary O'Neall
  • Re: [spdx-tech] A proposal for SPDX Private License Identifiers. Example: .com.amazon.-.ASL-2.0 Sebastian Schuberth

• Earlier messages
• Later messages