nothing fancy, just some test shots. I got, as they say, an offer I
couldn't refuse.
Question: is anyone having problems with sharpness? I've got it set at
*Fine Sharpness advanced all the way to the + sign* and I still had to
sharpen them up a bit in Lightroom. I know folks were in
--
From: Christine Aguila
Subject: K7 sharpness question
nothing fancy, just some test shots. I got, as they say, an offer I
couldn't refuse.
Question: is anyone having problems with sharpness? I've got it set at
*Fine Sharpness advanced
- Original Message -
From: William Robb war...@gmail.com
Perhaps stopping down a little bit would improve things?
Good point
Also, have you checked to ensure both AF and MF are accurate and in
agreement with each other?
No, but I will.
Thanks, Bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Nice pic, though. Unlike Bob and Doug, I like the sign. Don't know why,
I just
do.
But since two of the best and most knowledgable photogs on the list don't
like it, who am I to say?
;-)
yea, get back in yer hide, Nature-boy!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Thanks for that insight Mark. I was close to on the verge of
understanding
that. And of course in PS, that's one of the things that bites me
frequently.
Not damaging my original, but creating a sized version that I have trouble
recreating later, sized differently.
I feel a certain degree
This is really a pretty lame photograph, it since it doesn't tell a story
without
the caption.
Caption: Former Masonic Temple now a Scientology Center. There's no
outward sign but this building is now a Center for Scientology, a group
even
more secretive than the group that preceded them
My own blue suede shoes:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jb_sessoms/4867617684/
Nice! I wish I had photos of my blue suede shoes. Unfortunately, they
predated my interest in photography by several years, and I haven't seen
any family snapshots that managed to capture them. It was the mid
Nothing but just fooling around.
Elvis's pink Cadillac:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jb_sessoms/4867617482/
that's one for the money.
My own blue suede shoes:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jb_sessoms/4867617684/
and two for the shoe.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
prostitutes are cheaper, and there are more of them around.
Nice light, nice angel. I could use an angel most days.
Paul
On Aug 6, 2010, at 8:23 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Still not satisfied with it, but ...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jb_sessoms/4867574190/
--
PDML
Did a job for my parents this weekend. They are members of a
philanthropic group, Australian Council for the Promotion of the
Peaceful Reunification of China, which sounds just as long in Mandarin.
Being it's 10th anniversary, there was a three day conference. Not
normally my sort of thing,
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Anthony Farr farranth...@gmail.com wrote:
Very well Mr Jones, I'll make an exception this time. But NEXT
YEARS prostate examination will definitely be conducted in my
consulting rooms.
I think we have a winner!
LOL
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois
Hi!
In Gallery mode there is a screen called Keyword list. It shows the
tree of my LR keywords. Is there a way (I think I remember it was
possible in LR2) to make it so that sub-keywords would count towards the
respective keywords up in the tree???
Thanks.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
That fine sharpness setting is only relevant if your shooting jpegs. If
you're shooting RAW, some sharpening is always necessary with any DSLR.
Also make sure the camera and your lenses are in synch in regard to focal
point. Test each lens for excessive front and rear focus and adjust as
On Aug 7, 2010, at 3:41 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
- Original Message - From: William Robb war...@gmail.com
Perhaps stopping down a little bit would improve things?
Good point
Depends on what lens you're shooting with. The DA* 50-135 is sharpest at f4. I
believe the 16-50 is
Hi!
Spotted this happy couple in the park...
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/08/peso-2010-35-modern-times.html
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
Spotted this happy couple in the park...
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/08/peso-2010-35-modern-times.html
Young love - connected by wires.
;-)
Terrific shot, Boris!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a
Hi!
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/08/pentax-fa-24-9035-45-if-al-mini-review.html
All in all - I am very happy about my yet another recent acquisition.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
Bob W
Sent: 07 August 2010 10:12
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: PESOs - Pink and Blue Suede
My own blue suede shoes:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jb_sessoms/4867617684/
Nice! I wish I had photos of my blue suede shoes. Unfortunately,
they
predated my interest in
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jaiq_ZZ_eMfeature=player_embedded#
I think we all had fun with these in our time.
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
They look pretty good overall. Some are a tad flat and might benefit from your
punching up the contrast.(?)
I've never tried sharpening totally within the camera.
Jack
--- On Sat, 8/7/10, Christine Aguila cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
From: Christine Aguila cagu...@earthlink.net
Subject: K7
John Celio's AF 35-70/2.8 arrived and is united with the ME-F that's been
sitting in a cupboard for years:
http://mitch.myzen.co.uk/PDML/_IGP5615.jpg
With new batteries throughout, it all works perfectly. AF is slow and only
works in good contrasty light. It's done by pressing a button on the
In Gallery mode there is a screen called Keyword list. It shows the tree
of
my LR keywords. Is there a way (I think I remember it was possible in LR2)
to
make it so that sub-keywords would count towards the respective keywords
up in the tree???
right click on a keyword to open a context
Cute shot of a Modern high tech couple. Very well seen, Boris!
Jack
--- On Sat, 8/7/10, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com
Subject: Boris PESO 34 - Modern times
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Saturday, August 7, 2010, 4:05 AM
On 8/7/2010 3:12 PM, Bob W wrote:
right click on a keyword to open a context menu which includes various
options for working with keyword sets and hierarchies.
B
Hmmm... Nothing in there. If you can send me a screen shot off list, Bob...
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Just jumping in here.
I just saw a short interview with Scott Kelby. He was asked about his
use of Lightroom and Photoshop. He said that is a little strange that
the guy known as the Photoshop king does about 80% of his work in
Lightroom. He also said that when he does go to Photoshop it is
Thanks Rick. I think i only tried it in P mode.
Still looking for it, i know its in the house some were.
Dave
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Manual page 181.
Camera to TV or M, flash to high-speed sync.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On
Sounds like a decent ride. 162 miles, i'm happy just to get through my
8.5 Km ride everyday.:-)
Dave
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Tomorrow Dr Lisa and I set off on a 162-mile bike ride (over 2 days)
From Wellesley to Provincetown. The Pan-Mass
If it were me, it would be faster to download another copy from the
Pentax website. GS
On Saturday, August 7, 2010, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Rick. I think i only tried it in P mode.
Still looking for it, i know its in the house some were.
Dave
--
George Sinos
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Doug Franklin
jehosep...@mindspring.com wrote:
On 2010-08-06 19:25, frank theriault wrote:
Phil, do I understand that a Monero is the Aussie version of a Pontiac
Grand Prix? If so, the mechanics can't be the same, as the Pontiac is
a FWD car, and clearly from
Spent an hour or so Friday shooting bluejays in the back yard. I tried
to get shots of them landing on the old BBQ but failed miserably.
This was the best.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11391240
K10D D FA 50-200
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
On 8/7/2010 7:45 AM, Chris Mitchell wrote:
Bob W
Sent: 07 August 2010 10:12
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: PESOs - Pink and Blue Suede
My own blue suede shoes:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jb_sessoms/4867617684/
Nice! I wish I had photos of my blue suede
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 07:44:07PM -0400, frank theriault scripsit:
Okay, maybe not thousands, but that almost solid line just below the
trees is (believe it or not) a line of cormorants skimming across the
water:
Nice sharp photograph of cowering peanuts...
On 8/7/2010 9:21 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Spent an hour or so Friday shooting bluejays in the back yard. I tried
to get shots of them landing on the old BBQ but failed miserably.
This was the best.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11391240
The slight over exposure of the peanuts (on my monitor) and Jay blur makes me
curious as to the camera settings.
This sort of catch is extremely difficult due to the virtual impossibility of
panning and then stopping on a mark.
Jack
--- On Sat, 8/7/10, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
On 2010-08-07 7:45, Chris Mitchell wrote:
The 70s - the decade that fashion forgot?
I don't think it forgot, I think it was still having flashbacks from the
60s.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
A new photo and scribbling available for your pleasure
http://godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com/in-motion
comments always appreciated, thanks for looking.
Godfrey
--
http://godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Glad to see you are enjoying the lens. Paired well with the Zx-5n.
For me, the FOV was better on 35mm than APS-C because it isn't wide
enough at the short end.
If you think that the build is plasticky, it's pretty much the same
as the FA 28-105/3.2-4.5. They are roughly the same length when
Gee, when I was younger, all we had were string can phones. lol Nice capture.
Pat
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
Spotted this happy couple in the park...
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/08/peso-2010-35-modern-times.html
Boris
--
PDML
--
From: George Sinos
Subject: Re: Adobe CS5 vs. Lightroom 3
Just jumping in here.
I just saw a short interview with Scott Kelby. He was asked about his
use of Lightroom and Photoshop. He said that is a little strange that
the guy known as the
--
From: paul stenquist
Subject: Re: K7 sharpness question
On Aug 7, 2010, at 3:41 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
- Original Message - From: William Robb war...@gmail.com
Perhaps stopping down a little bit would improve things?
Good
--
From: Walter Hamler
Subject: Semi OT: Some fond memories
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jaiq_ZZ_eMfeature=player_embedded#
I think we all had fun with these in our time.
Shot my first porn with one of those.
William Robb
--
PDML
--
From: Derby Chang
Subject: Should the K10D switch batteries automatically? (and a GESO)
Had the K10D with grip, the venerable *istDS and mostly primes. On the
K10D, I have the battery selection set to grip first. I seem to recall it
should
On Aug 7, 2010, at 11:10 AM, William Robb wrote:
--
From: paul stenquist
Subject: Re: K7 sharpness question
On Aug 7, 2010, at 3:41 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
- Original Message - From: William Robb war...@gmail.com
On Aug 7, 2010, at 11:08 AM, William Robb wrote:
--
From: George Sinos
Subject: Re: Adobe CS5 vs. Lightroom 3
Just jumping in here.
I just saw a short interview with Scott Kelby. He was asked about his
use of Lightroom and Photoshop.
--
From: paul stenquist
Subject: Re: K7 sharpness question
Perhaps stopping down a little bit would improve things?
Good point
Depends on what lens you're shooting with. The DA* 50-135 is sharpest at
f4. I believe the 16-50 is as well.
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Spotted this happy couple in the park...
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/08/peso-2010-35-modern-times.html
Boris
that's a chuckle :)
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
The slight over exposure of the peanuts (on my monitor) and Jay blur makes me
curious as to the camera settings.
It showed under exposure, slightly, on the LCD histogram.
However the histogram in LR showed clipping, so i
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
The slight over exposure of the peanuts (on my monitor) and Jay blur makes me
curious as to the camera settings.
Sorry, i forgot to add:
1/400 at f5.6 at 200mm ISO at 200.
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
I like the composition. Looks like they are getting ready to fly out
and see Bruce and Jack.;-)
Dave
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 7:44 PM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, maybe not thousands, but that almost solid line just below the
trees is (believe it or not) a line of
Well done. I like the not over bearing swirls and the rendering is wonderful
Dave
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi ramar...@mac.com wrote:
A new photo and scribbling available for your pleasure
http://godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com/in-motion
comments always appreciated,
I did assume that, Dave. My point was that panning wasn't an option and that
you had done exactly as you stated. In which case you would need a bit more
shutter speed for the Jay. =)
Jack
--- On Sat, 8/7/10, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
From: David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
Opps, sorry.:-)
Ya i think i need 800 or higher. I'll be working on this for a while.
I'm still on vacation for another 4 weeks,. Hopefully i can get one
good shot.:-)
Dave
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
I did assume that, Dave. My point was that panning
As a slight aside here, I have been using Photoshop CS (version 8) for a
few years and never updated past that - but since I have effectively
stopped my stills photography, I am now using CS more and more for a
lot of my video graphics. The nice thing about it is I can save the
artwork as .PSD
On Aug 7, 2010, at 1:12 PM, William Robb wrote:
--
From: paul stenquist
Subject: Re: K7 sharpness question
Perhaps stopping down a little bit would improve things?
Good point
Depends on what lens you're shooting with. The DA* 50-135
Was going to write to Rob and Cory off list but I'll throw it open as
I'm a glutton for punishment and someone somewhere might glean a tidbit here.
Wiring explanation please!
I'm coming out of a portable computer and going into a Fostex squawkbox.
The computer audio out is stereo 3.5mm TRS
I'm still on vacation for another 4 weeks,. Hopefully i can get one
good shot.:-)
MARK !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Peso Gear down.
Opps, sorry.:-)
Ya i think i need
Can't wait for all those migratory birds to come down and winter here in the
Valley of the Sun!
Jerry
From: David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Five Swans and Thousands of Cormorants
Message-ID:
Thanks Dave!
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 10:31 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Well done. I like the not over bearing swirls and the rendering is wonderful
Dave
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi ramar...@mac.com wrote:
A new photo and scribbling available for your
Cotty, are you still running Apple-PowerPC systems or are you on
Apple-Intel systems now? If you're on Apple-Intel systems, you really
want to move to Photohop CS3 at least for performance reasons. CS/CS2
are PowerPC executables, running in emulation on the current
generation of Apple hardware.
In my world at least,and I suspect in many others, proflic great,
prolific good.
The good ones, ones worth keeping are far and few between, and the
excellent ones even more rare.
So routinely running a bunch of images through a workflow, only to
have done so, and then writing them to some
Hi gang. I need to sell my 645 kit. Included are the manual focus
body with front and rear caps, 120 and 220 film magazines with
holders, A200/4, A120/4 Macro (best lens ever, IMHO), A45/2.8 with
45-125 hood, A35/3.5 with case. The A35 has the original front cap,
the 200 and 120 have newer
Submit photos here: http://pdmlpug.org/?page_id=54
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
__o
_'\,_
(*)/ (*)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
... So do those of you using workflow do it largely for organizational
purposes?
The question is rather odd. The term workflow can be applied to any
sequenced series of steps that take you from one state to another in
Cotty,
I think this should work:
http://www.mediacollege.com/audio/connection/xlr-jack-stereo.html
In addition, here's a LOT of words and some photos that are likely more
than most people want to know about TRS and TS and TRRS connectors:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRS_connector
And if you
On 2010-08-07 13:26 , Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
If you're on Apple-Intel systems, you really
want to move to Photohop CS3 at least for performance reasons. CS/CS2
are PowerPC executables, running in emulation on the current
generation of Apple hardware. CS3 is the first native-code version of
I don't find it odd at all. Of course, I asked it.
What I find odd is that one would use an *automated* *image adjustment
workflow* in a manner that is like taking ones images to a 3rd party
processor and having all images processed using the same parameters.
One might get consistently mediocre
On 7/8/10, Cory Waters, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty,
I think this should work:
http://www.mediacollege.com/audio/connection/xlr-jack-stereo.html
Thanks mate I will - Mrs has a DVD of Crazy Heart which I am told I have
to watch. Then I will have a look at above.
In addition, here's a LOT
--
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: Adobe CS5 vs. Lightroom 3
In my world at least,and I suspect in many others, proflic great,
prolific good.
The good ones, ones worth keeping are far and few between, and the
excellent ones even more rare.
So
From: Doug Franklin
On 2010-08-06 20:49, John Sessoms wrote:
My own blue suede shoes:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jb_sessoms/4867617684/
Nice! I wish I had photos of my blue suede shoes. Unfortunately, they
predated my interest in photography by several years, and I haven't seen
any
On 2010-08-07 13:43 , Tom C wrote:
So do those of you using workflow do it largely for organizational purposes?
yes, my workflow is largely about organization; early on i set aside the
larger portion of images, but i also quickly process them in order to be
able to find them later, except
Scott Loveless wrote:
Submit photos here: http://pdmlpug.org/?page_id=54
ok - I'll get one in this evening!
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
Why does that NOT surprise me :-)
Walt
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 11:13 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
Shot my first porn with one of those.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
William Robb wrote:
--
From: Derby Chang
Subject: Should the K10D switch batteries automatically? (and a GESO)
Had the K10D with grip, the venerable *istDS and mostly primes. On
the K10D, I have the battery selection set to grip first. I seem
- Original Message -
From: paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2010 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: K7 sharpness question
On Aug 7, 2010, at 1:12 PM, William Robb wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
What I find odd is that one would use an *automated* *image adjustment
workflow* in a manner that is like taking ones images to a 3rd party
processor and having all images processed using the same parameters. ...
a) Who said
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2010 7:12 AM
Subject: Re: K7 sharpness question
They look pretty good overall. Some are a tad flat and might benefit from
your punching up the contrast.(?)
Cam you imagine what it was like?
On 8/7/2010 5:08 PM, Walter Hamler wrote:
Why does that NOT surprise me :-)
Walt
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 11:13 AM, William Robbwar...@gmail.com wrote:
Shot my first porn with one of those.
William Robb
--
Here's something to think
- Original Message -
From: Bob W p...@web-options.com
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2010 4:11 AM
Subject: RE: PESOs - Pink and Blue Suede
My own blue suede shoes:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jb_sessoms/4867617684/
Nice! I wish I had
I've spent the day in Bridge re-organizing my back catalog. I'm trying
achieve a consistent naming scheme that identifies the camera and keeps
all the files in the sequence they were taken - e.g. istD_n.xxx,
K10D_.xxx ... five digits allows for when the shutter goes past
. I
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:29 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
while it's not as fast, CS2 runs without problem on Intel Macs (my
experience is up through Mac OS X 10.5); the Intel-native version is quicker
and has new features, and is an obvious choice for commercial production
use,
As is often the case, you assume I know much less than I do, and
therefore interpret what I write as if I'm a total neophyte which is
not the case. Maybe that's because you perceive yourself as superior?
You didn't tell me one thing there that I didn't already know. Nor did
I make a statement
On 8/08/2010 06:01, Scott Loveless wrote:
Submit photos here: http://pdmlpug.org/?page_id=54
Phew - made it!
Regards,
Pete Mac in western Sydney
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
If any of the NorCal PDMLers want to join Larry, Igor, and myself for
dinner on Sunday, we will be meeting at the City College of San
Francisco Wellness Center (Ocean Avenue at Howth St) at 6:20pm. Then
we'll be heading off for dinner at Ninki Sushi at 1439 Taraval St
(x-street 24th Ave).
Pat
As is so often the case, what you wrote evidently didn't match what
you meant to say. I'm sorry, I can't divine your intended meaning if
you don't know how to write comprehensible English.
I've been using Lightroom through all beta and release versions for
five years, have produced 6,000+
John -
One of the biggest advantages of converting to DNG is the elimination
of sidecar files. Since Adobe understands the file layout, they can
embed the information directly in the DNG.
One less thing to keep track of.
This has been a typical internet answer to a question that wasn't
asked,
You still didn't get it.
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
As is so often the case, what you wrote evidently didn't match what
you meant to say. I'm sorry, I can't divine your intended meaning if
you don't know how to write comprehensible English.
Ah, you want to be a clown. I get it.
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
You still didn't get it.
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
As is so often the case, what you wrote evidently didn't match what
you meant to say. I'm
And you want to be an ***.
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
You still didn't get it.
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
As is so often the case, what you wrote evidently didn't match what
you meant to say. I'm sorry,
On 2010-08-07 14:33 , Tom C wrote:
I don't find it odd at all. Of course, I asked it.
What I find odd is that one would use an *automated* *image adjustment
workflow* in a manner that is like taking ones images to a 3rd party
processor and having all images processed using the same parameters.
On 2010-08-07 15:36 , Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I didn't say CS2 had problems running on the Apple-Intel box; I said
performance was *significantly* improved.
indeed it is improved; i simply wanted to reassure Cotty that the
performance for many purposes is good enough and that CS2 is otherwise
On 7/8/10, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty, are you still running Apple-PowerPC systems or are you on
Apple-Intel systems now? If you're on Apple-Intel systems, you really
want to move to Photohop CS3 at least for performance reasons. CS/CS2
are PowerPC executables, running in
On 7/8/10, steve harley, discombobulated, unleashed:
indeed it is improved; i simply wanted to reassure Cotty that the
performance for many purposes is good enough and that CS2 is otherwise
quite workable
Hey, you wanna try rendering some complicated stuff in Final Cut on a
2.4 15 MBP - compared
On 6/8/10, Michael Beacom, discombobulated, unleashed:
Finally- a Pentax Rangefinder!
Except it's a fantasy that 8 or maybe 10 people share.
11.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 3:37 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
To me, performance improvements like that make the CS2 to CS4 upgrade
fee trivial when I consider how much time it will save. It also means
editing becomes FAR more responsive and fun. :-)
it's a significant but not
Being called an *** by a clown reflects on the clown more than the ***.
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
And you want to be an ***.
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
You still didn't get it.
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 6:05
On 7/8/10, Derby Chang, discombobulated, unleashed:
Anyway, here's a rough gallery. Still culling
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/10/10_08/10_08_acpprc/index.htm
Well done Derbs, and you *still* manage to get a few pretty girl shots!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
Tom!
I just spent some of my valuable time left in my life reading every
one of these posts about P.S., Lightroom, Aperture. I'm not sure why.
But I will say that it appears to me that you are the one not getting
it. You asked the question. These others are trying to help you
understand
On 7/8/10, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
prostitutes are cheaper, and there are more of them around.
Especially where you live.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
On 7/8/10, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
Being called an *** by a clown reflects on the clown more than the
***.
You guys should count your blessings. I am regularly called a * ***
*** * ** .
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
On Aug 7, 2010, at 16:17 , Cotty wrote:
On 7/8/10, Derby Chang, discombobulated, unleashed:
Anyway, here's a rough gallery. Still culling
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/10/10_08/10_08_acpprc/index.htm
Well done Derbs, and you *still* manage to get a few pretty girl
shots!
To
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo