[videoblogging] Fwd: Opera proposed Theora for native video playback in browsers
Awesome news! -- Forwarded message -- From: Luis Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mar 5, 2007 2:23 PM Subject: [theora] Opera proposed Theora for native video playback in browsers To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi , I see this news in Opera website : http://my.opera.com/haavard/blog/2007/03/05/1 I think this is a good news for Theora Team and also a greater news if video tag becomes true. This extract of the website is incredible : 'One thing to keep in mind that adding native support for Theora in Opera would only add about 300K to Opera's overall size! And I am sure that could even be optimized to reduce it even further.' _ ___ theora mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/theora -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] The Case Against Advertising in Net Video
Hello, Would it help if you could review which ads get placed in the video? (I know some advertising networks allow you to review ads.) See ya On 3/2/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've put up a post on my Lucid Media blog that may be of interest here. It is the rational for not placing ads within videos: http://tinyurl.com/37s2ma or http://lucidmedia.cirne.com/index.php/2007/03/02/the-case-against-advertising-in-net-video/ Blog text follows: == Recently methods of advertising in video have become active in development and implementation. Originally when I heard the rational for Ads in net videos from Revver, I thought it worthwhile. Provide a method for people making video on the net to gain revenue from their work. This would support net videomakers continuing their work. There had been entries on the yahoo videoblogging group and on blogs for Ads targeted to the audience and content of the video. Similar to Google showing Ads that try to relate to keyword searches; an Ad for Harley motorcycles could appear on a videoblog entry about a weekend motorcycle hog excursion with friends. Unfortunately, specifying include an Ad in my video on Revver, blip.tv and others means you can have a powerful, emotive video on the relationship to one's father followed by a upbeat commercial for Juicy Fruit gum. Or a irreverent video of doing a prank on someone followed by a commercial for the Heart Association. Now this problem probably just relates to the technicality of specifying categories for the Ad's relationships to video content and the amount of different Ads available. With time the correlation of Ads to video content and the viewership should have stronger matching. The question is why have Ads in videos on distributed networks. Traditionally, on a television set broadcast a advertisement had to exist within the video stream. No other location was provided for placement. However on the internet an Ad does not need to be in the video. It can be anywhere around the video on the web page. Either top, left, right, bottom or lower down the page. Now video on the net does not mean just a web page. It can be an iPod, mobile phone, Tivo, or even projected in a theatre film festival. All of these non-website screens can and probably will develop methods of displaying more than just a video stream. A future iPod, mobile phone, digital TV and theatre projector will be able to show more than just the video. Like the Opera super- and sub-titles projected separately from the performance, these screens will probably eventually have dynamic separate information areas where Ads can appear. Further with the usage of different screen ratios than 4x3 (16x9, etc.), space can be made available around the video to place Ads. This puts advertising in the video stream, but does not directly break up the video continuity. Google proved the failure of putting ads directly in searches. Flash Ads that pop-up and dance up over the content of web-pages send people away from sites. And Ads that interrupt the video, even at the end, will be found to be ineffective. They will either drive people away from watching the videos if at the start or middle or tend to not be watched if at the end. Ads placed around the video will work since people can choose to pay attention to the periphery of a video if the ad relates to their interest or ignore that area. == -- Enric -==- http://www.cirne.com -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/
Re: [videoblogging] Rocketboom Down?
Works for me. On 3/2/07, Susan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have I just been living under a rock... has Rocketboom been down for a long time, or is it just today? Susan http://vlog.kitykity.com -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/
Re: [videoblogging] can i use digital camera for vblog ?
Hello, If it can shoot video, then you can (theoretically) use it. However... the question is do you want to use it?! What you should be asking yourself is... ... is the video quality it produces good enough for you? ... is the memory it has sufficient for you? ... is the zooming something you can use well? (There's probably other things to consider too.) Ask youself that and you'll kow your answer. See ya On 3/2/07, michael12happy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't have a digital camera yet but I am very interested to do a video blog Can I use this digital camera Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX3 for video blog ? http://www.dpreview.com/news/0607/06071902panasonicfx3.asp what are the other accessories to buy ? memory card ? microphone ?..etc do i have to buy any software ? please advise -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: The Case Against Advertising in Net Video
Hello, I understand what you are saying now. On 3/2/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The point is not which Ads are placed in videos, but that videos are interrupted with Ads. I think some companies (new and old) developing new media tools are missing (sometimes intentionaly) the point of why people love pop-up blockers and ad blockers. Why a clean minimal google search with unobtrusive text ads on the side is prefered to search engines that would put ads within search results. Why flash ads that popped out of the page took away future page views. The distributed net empowers not only those making videos to make what they want, but those viewing to not view videos with ads that intrude in their video viewing. It will not in the long run empower ad makers to find more intrusive ways to overlay ads over running video, create click ad regions and product placement. Given the choice most will choose not to break up their video with ads, but to take the option to view related ads on the side of the video. -- Enric -==- http://www.cirne.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Would it help if you could review which ads get placed in the video? (I know some advertising networks allow you to review ads.) See ya On 3/2/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've put up a post on my Lucid Media blog that may be of interest here. It is the rational for not placing ads within videos: http://tinyurl.com/37s2ma or http://lucidmedia.cirne.com/index.php/2007/03/02/the-case-against-advertising-in-net-video/ Blog text follows: == Recently methods of advertising in video have become active in development and implementation. Originally when I heard the rational for Ads in net videos from Revver, I thought it worthwhile. Provide a method for people making video on the net to gain revenue from their work. This would support net videomakers continuing their work. There had been entries on the yahoo videoblogging group and on blogs for Ads targeted to the audience and content of the video. Similar to Google showing Ads that try to relate to keyword searches; an Ad for Harley motorcycles could appear on a videoblog entry about a weekend motorcycle hog excursion with friends. Unfortunately, specifying include an Ad in my video on Revver, blip.tv and others means you can have a powerful, emotive video on the relationship to one's father followed by a upbeat commercial for Juicy Fruit gum. Or a irreverent video of doing a prank on someone followed by a commercial for the Heart Association. Now this problem probably just relates to the technicality of specifying categories for the Ad's relationships to video content and the amount of different Ads available. With time the correlation of Ads to video content and the viewership should have stronger matching. The question is why have Ads in videos on distributed networks. Traditionally, on a television set broadcast a advertisement had to exist within the video stream. No other location was provided for placement. However on the internet an Ad does not need to be in the video. It can be anywhere around the video on the web page. Either top, left, right, bottom or lower down the page. Now video on the net does not mean just a web page. It can be an iPod, mobile phone, Tivo, or even projected in a theatre film festival. All of these non-website screens can and probably will develop methods of displaying more than just a video stream. A future iPod, mobile phone, digital TV and theatre projector will be able to show more than just the video. Like the Opera super- and sub-titles projected separately from the performance, these screens will probably eventually have dynamic separate information areas where Ads can appear. Further with the usage of different screen ratios than 4x3 (16x9, etc.), space can be made available around the video to place Ads. This puts advertising in the video stream, but does not directly break up the video continuity. Google proved the failure of putting ads directly in searches. Flash Ads that pop-up and dance up over the content of web-pages send people away from sites. And Ads that interrupt the video, even at the end, will be found to be ineffective. They will either drive people away from watching the videos if at the start or middle or tend to not be watched if at the end. Ads placed around the video will work since people can choose to pay attention to the periphery of a video if the ad relates to their interest or ignore that area. == -- Enric -==- http
Re: [videoblogging] Looking for case studies
Have you tried looking at Ask a Ninja or Rocketboom? See ya On 2/27/07, David Tames [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm updating my presentation on Delivering Video on the Web and I'm looking for some case studies in which people have actually made a little money as a result of putting their video on the web. I love the FOUR EYED MONSTERS and MENTOS AND DIET COKE case studies, but I'm looking for some new, fresh, innovative stores of how you've managed to get a little revenue from your video work. Please respond to me privately and if I have people's permissions, I'll share the case studies as well as my presentation with the list. Thanks in advance for your help, David. David Tames, Filmmaker Media Technologist http://kino-eye.com | 617.216.1096 -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/
[videoblogging] The Death of Video Culture?
This might be of interest to some people here... http://fimoculous.com/archive/post-2218.cfm See ya -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] castTV
Here's an article about them... http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/03/casttv-will-revolutionize-video-search/ On 2/22/07, Irina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hey anyone know anything about castTV? -- http://geekentertainment.tv -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/
Re: [videoblogging] Myspace Will Censor You
Posted it on the Myspace InternetTV group :-) BTW... wasn't Myspace blocking YouTube before. (This isn't the first time they've done that.) See ya On 2/2/07, Kent Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cross Posted: http://www.askaninja.com/node/2836 http://www.askaninja.com/node/2836 Let me start off by saying we love all of our friends and fans that we've made through Myspace. But sometimes Myspace the company does some gross stuff that violates the spirit it was created under and the values of the Internet itself. Over the last few months there has been a lot of debate over Net Neutrality, which basically boils down to one company blocking access to to another companies servers in order to gain a business advantage. This debate has usually focused on the companies that charge for bandwidth like ATT, but recently Myspace has pioneered a new form -- blocking sites that users link to in their bulletins and profiles. Right now if you link to anything at a site like http://revver . com (remove the spaces) Myspace will delete the link. Try it. That sucks right? Revver is not the only site. There are dozens of smaller video and photo sharing sites that they are doing this to. Why should you care? Ask A Ninja was created because we were in control of where we posted the videos. That's a big deal because if we're forced to put them on MySpace video then FOX could take the episodes and make money off of them without paying Douglas or me anything. Which isn't fair and takes away the incentive to create cool shows for you to watch. Why is this against Net Neutrality? Because videos from Myspace Video and Youtube are not effected. It's only these smaller, more innovative companies that haven't been sold for billions of dollars. Here's what you can do: Copy this bulletin. Repost it. Blog about it. Make Tom put up a little fix it bulletin saying he's sorry. Once you've reposted this, send a message to Tom (http://myspace.com/tomanderson) like this (or even better, write your own): I'm sending this message to request that MySpace stop blocking videos from sites like Revver. Choosing the video-sharing service that is right for me is very important and is why you built Myspace. What I like most about MySpace is that I can generally do what I want here. I like that Myspace is a relatively open platform where I can communicate with my friends (and promote my stuff) in all sorts of ways. I feel good about sharing videos from Revver because I know they respect copyright and look out for independent artists. Please bring back Revver! Be Vocal Publish your opi- nions with a blog. -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/
[videoblogging] MSM - Conspiracy Theory Rock
Hello, Kind of funny... http://throwawayyourtv.com/2006/12/conspiracy-theory-rock.html See ya -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] virus protection
http://www.clamwin.com/ On 12/14/06, Richard (Show) Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I'm getting ready to make the big leap and download/install parallels, then it occurred to me that I probably should install some virus protection for XP so I am wondering ... Any recommendations for virus protection for xp (is in any different when running it with parellels) - ok that's two questions? Open source/free would be cool. For that matter, I'm wondering if you mac users use virus protection and, if so, what? .. Richard (the man with many virus protection questions). -- http://richardhhall.org http://richardshow.com http://inspiredhealing.tv -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/
[videoblogging] Fwd: [vlc] Release: VLC media player 0.8.6
Hello, There's a new version of VLC out. See ya -- Forwarded message -- From: Derk-Jan Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Dec 10, 2006 6:22 AM Subject: [vlc] Release: VLC media player 0.8.6 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dear VideoLAN users, Building on feedback from the 29 million downloads of VLC media player 0.8.5, we bring you version 0.8.6 with many bugfixes, as well as a couple of new features we think you will truly enjoy. Highlights of the new features and improvements: * Support for Windows Media Video 9 and VC-1 * Support for VP5/VP6 and Flash video * Support for TTA and WavPack Lossless audio * Much improved H.264 support * Preliminary DVR-ms, MXF support * Shoutcast TV support * Windows unicode fixes * Apple Remote support * Apple Fullscreen controller * Universal Binary For a complete list, please have a look at the release notes: http://developers.videolan.org/vlc/NEWS You can download VLC from here: http://www.videolan.org/vlc Packages are already available for Windows and Mac OS X. Other binary packages (Debian Packages, SuSE and Fedora Core RPM, BeOS) should follow soon. Remember to reset your preferences if you experience problems after upgrading from a previous version. The VideoLAN Team -- This is the vlc mailing-list, see http://www.videolan.org/vlc/ To unsubscribe, please read http://www.videolan.org/support/lists.html -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Video Blog on Days of Our Lives
Hey, My Mom has watched that show religiously since she was a little kid. And because, growing up, no one was allowed to change the channel (or even really talk) when it was on... I know way too much about that show. Like who Bo's real father is. And that Bo and Billy never had a daughter before but now they did... but hey it's days of our lives. H... I find it somewhat disturbing that I know that. See ya On 12/7/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello? He--llo? Does nobody care? Days of Our Lives PEOPLE! What... are you all afraid of offending Dan McVicar??? *sigh* My mother taped it... so if any of you care, I can put it online at some point. *sigh* Casey McKinnon, Full-time Videoblogger, Part-time Soap Opera Watcher --- http://www.galacticast.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey everyone, I was just working on my laptop while watching Days of Our Lives (guilty pleasure) and they mentioned that Chelsea (Bo and Billie's daughter) has a Video Blog. The episode aired today from 1-2pm EST, if anyone on the west coast can record it when it airs over there, please do. I think others would get a kick out of it... Best, Casey --- Casey McKinnon Executive Producer, Galacticast http://www.galacticast.com/ -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/
Re: [videoblogging] The YouTube debate is over..........
Hello Heath, What YouTube has done is called branding. And they've done a good job of it. Now... that doesn't mean that they've won. That only means that they are king right now. Once upon a time AltaVista was the king of search engines. When most people said search the web... most people automatically assumed you meant search the web with AltaVista. Today... that's not the case. Google is currently king of search... and is synonymous with searching the web. Want to be king... go on a branding campaign. (And of course have something at least descent to use.) See ya On 12/4/06, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just had an interesting experience today that put in perspective to me just what YouTube has become. YouTube IS online video, vlogging, whatever you want to call it. YouTube is it, it's the Ipod of online video and everyone else is sandisk, zune, etc. Now, why do I say that? A month or so ago I filmed some footage for work to go to an offsite. The guys and gals where I work know that I do video and put stuff online, they know I do not use YouTube, that I have a vlog site, etc. Well I just put together a clip of flubs from the guy who was doing the tour on the video. (it IS funny btw). I put it on a VCD because I was just going to give it to the guy as a funny gift (because the name of the company and such was mentioned I did not want to upload it, don't relish getting warned/fired) I showed it this morning and it killed but what was interesting was this. Everyone said, That needs to go on YouTube, this from guys and gals in age from 20 something to over 50, This needs to go on YouTubeNOT hey put it on your site or upload it to blip or Revver, or whatever, no it HAS to go on YouTube. YouTube is or has become a the standard for online video, I mean what else can you conclude? Understand these are not techy people, yes they may be a little ahead of the curve but trust me, just ordinary guys and gals. YouTube is what the know and what they use to watch videos. I mean it is like it is America's funniest videos for the web. So what does this mean? To me it means the conversation on wheather YouTube is really vlogging or is here to stay, is a moot point. Yes you can become sucessful in vlogging or online video without YT but to the VAST majority of people if you aint on YT, then you aint doing online videoI don't want to say that, I don't want it to be true, but I am really beginging to think that it is true. Maybe I am wrong, I want to be wrong in some ways but I gotta say based on my very informal test...the YouTube debate is over. Heath http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com btw yes, I am going to upload the video once I make a few tweaks and yes I am going to upload it to YouTube as wellbecause well, that's what the guy wanted.. -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/
Re: [videoblogging] The YouTube debate is over..........
Hey Mike, Broadcast.com... that's a name I haven't heard in a while. Yahoo really screwed that one up. See ya On 12/4/06, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: By the way, for whatever it's worth, this exercise may be fun. Step One: Read http://docs.yahoo.com/docs/pr/release285.html Step Two: Visit http://www.broadcast.com/ Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote: Hello Heath, What YouTube has done is called branding. And they've done a good job of it. Now... that doesn't mean that they've won. That only means that they are king right now. Once upon a time AltaVista was the king of search engines. When most people said search the web... most people automatically assumed you meant search the web with AltaVista. Today... that's not the case. Google is currently king of search... and is synonymous with searching the web. Want to be king... go on a branding campaign. (And of course have something at least descent to use.) See ya On 12/4/06, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:heathparks%40msn.com wrote: I just had an interesting experience today that put in perspective to me just what YouTube has become. YouTube IS online video, vlogging, whatever you want to call it. YouTube is it, it's the Ipod of online video and everyone else is sandisk, zune, etc. Now, why do I say that? A month or so ago I filmed some footage for work to go to an offsite. The guys and gals where I work know that I do video and put stuff online, they know I do not use YouTube, that I have a vlog site, etc. Well I just put together a clip of flubs from the guy who was doing the tour on the video. (it IS funny btw). I put it on a VCD because I was just going to give it to the guy as a funny gift (because the name of the company and such was mentioned I did not want to upload it, don't relish getting warned/fired) I showed it this morning and it killed but what was interesting was this. Everyone said, That needs to go on YouTube, this from guys and gals in age from 20 something to over 50, This needs to go on YouTubeNOT hey put it on your site or upload it to blip or Revver, or whatever, no it HAS to go on YouTube. YouTube is or has become a the standard for online video, I mean what else can you conclude? Understand these are not techy people, yes they may be a little ahead of the curve but trust me, just ordinary guys and gals. YouTube is what the know and what they use to watch videos. I mean it is like it is America's funniest videos for the web. So what does this mean? To me it means the conversation on wheather YouTube is really vlogging or is here to stay, is a moot point. Yes you can become sucessful in vlogging or online video without YT but to the VAST majority of people if you aint on YT, then you aint doing online videoI don't want to say that, I don't want it to be true, but I am really beginging to think that it is true. Maybe I am wrong, I want to be wrong in some ways but I gotta say based on my very informal test...the YouTube debate is over. Heath http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com btw yes, I am going to upload the video once I make a few tweaks and yes I am going to upload it to YouTube as wellbecause well, that's what the guy wanted.. -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: The YouTube debate is over..........
Hello Heath, On 12/4/06, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You hit upon what I think is the missing factor in this threadthe viewers.and that was whom I was talking about when I started this thread, the average joe or jane who goes online to view videos, when they go online they think YouTube because that is all that they have heard, with all respects to Yahoo's buyout of Broadcast.com in 1999, who in the general public heard of Broadcast.com prior to Yahoo buying them out? I would venture a small handful. It is the general public I talk about a lot when I think about these things In 1999... I don't think the general public was really on the web yet. So that's probably not a good way to judge it. Back then, Broadcast.com was known by the people who were on the Web at that time. (Wow... 1999... I was still in University.) See ya To the average person, the one who knows nothing of RSS feeds, subscribing to blogs, heck they don't even know what a blog is, honestly most don't. Come to Cincinnati, stop 10 people random on the street, I bet 1 maybe 2 have heard of RSS or a blog...but ask them if they have heard of YouTube? I would bet it's half...(sure that is just a guess, I suppose I will have to go downtown with my camera and ask them) That doesn't mean I think YouTube is the best place for videos, I don't, personaly I want people to come to my site. But that's me, all I can do is one step at a time try and teach people the differance and why sites like Blip are better. But the average joe wants to turn on the tv and look at a guide and channel surf, and YT is good for that, for better for worse Heath http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mark Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ha! Now I have your attention (ahem) My comments were summarising some general sentiments that I seem to have noticed rather than intended to point to anyone in particular. I would agree with Mike that there is a broader dialogue outside of YouTube which YouTubers who never leave the walled garden don't participate in. But it's also true that there's a large and vibrant dialogue going on *within* YouTube which (I'm generalizing...). Now, to be fair, a lot of that dialogue is YouTubers talking to other YouTubers about YouTubey things (as opposed to, say, videobloggers talking to video bloggers about video bloggy things...). But still. I guess having one foot in one camp and a toe dipped tentatively in the other (thanks in no small part to Blip.tv, about whom i cannot say enough etc.) I am just seeing what looks (to my superficial eyes) to be some small patches of itchy irony. As for the destination blog/vlog vs. the live journal blog analogy I agree that the 'top tier' blogs (in something of a self perpetuating system...) sit above the proletariat (ahem), and the same could be true for video blogs. Would I like to migrate all my subscribers somewhere I could monetize my work? Sure. Do I think, at this point, that there are enough of them, and that enough of them would follow to make a tactical withdrawal from YouTube worth my while? Probably not. Perhaps Malcolm Gladwell could identify the dozen people who would have to leave YouTube for a Tipping Point style collapse, but I fear I'm not one of them... Am I going to be tarred by the bush of YouTuber as my content migrates other places? It may be too late for that. Or it may not. One thing I think is interesting is that I read a lot about how the internet is increasingly invisible (ie taken for granted) by the current generation, with media distinctions essentially blurring. And I'm reading here that, if anything, more media distinctions are what's called for. Hmmm. Meanwhile, I do actually sort of understand what an RSS feed does. I can't for the effing life of me figure out what feedburning it will do. Although anything involving fire is always fun. Cheers MD www.youtube.com/markdaycomedy http://markdaycomedy.blip.tv/ etc. etc. -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/
Re: [videoblogging] Virtual identity
Hey Loiez, It look like Ziki is doing wildcard based advertising. eBay does this alot too. Basically, the way it works is that people can make ads where they put the searched phrase in the ad. So... someone can make an wild card ad title like... Buy ##PHRASE## And then ##PHRASE## is replaced with whatever is searched for. So, if you searched for Polar Bears, then the ad title would become... Buy Polar Bears (Note... they probably don't use ##PHRASE## exactly... but do use something like it.) So... Google's wildcard advertising technology might be able to tell if something is a person's name... and only show Ziki's wildcard ad for that. (Also... just to throw out a little more info... these wildcard ads are usually sold at a very very cheap rate... since they usually generate alot of garbage traffic for the advertiser... since they usually only show up when there are no other ads to show.) See ya On 11/30/06, Loiez D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oups ! Sorry i made a mistake if you search loiez deniel will be better Loiez Le 30 nov. 06 à 20:34, Loiez D. a écrit : In example if you search loiez on google you will find my vlog at the top of the page. -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: You Tube Anti-Racism Project
http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com http://pcclibtech.blogspot.com http://voxmedia.org/wiki/Video --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, thisiswar3005 thisiswar3005@ wrote: I just saw a video which was made as part of YouTube's Anti-Racism project. I think all of us should make some contribution to this effort, or if you run a video distribution company like Grouper, Blip.tv, etc., start your own version of the YouTube initiative. I'm personally saddened over the words of hate that some have written in response to clips of the recent Michael Richards rant. We have to do something to counter what seems to be a small movement toward, not away from, racism. See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mB3pDYTne0 Thanks! -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: You Tube Anti-Racism Project
Hey Nox, On 11/26/06, Nox Dineen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/26/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's also alot of things Anthropologists wouldn't dare say because of the political ramifications. (For example, Anthropologists wouldn't dare use the word species in describing different people. That's because it would be a wildly inaccurate application of the scientific term species. Or at least, that's what I learned while obtaining a degree in anthropology with a minor in biology (human genetics). I'll probably start using it during my PhD work next year, though, since I'm specialing in cyborg anthropology, and with cybernetics and such you really *are* starting to move into what could be argued is a leap in species. Also, wouldn't dare push the point that certain langauges developed from Creole languages in certain parts of the world... because that implies a mixing of different people in the past. Etc etc.) Care to cite some sources? I can try and give specifics if you're interested in the topic. I can't remember where I was reading it. I think it may have been our a couple different books or papers... and if that's the case I'll have to do some hunting... but... the particular example I was thinking about when I wrote that was that of Proto-Germanic. There's evidence to suggest that Proto-Germanic was a Creole language. And something else I read was arguing that the Germanic people's are a hybrid of (at least) Celtic people and today what we call Iranian people. There were some other arguments citing similarities between the old Aryan religion Zoroastrianisms... and Pre-Christian Germanic mythology (But you say that around some people will have all sorts of political fallout.) After reading some of that, I was actually wondering myself as to whether there was a link between the runes and the ancient Aryan wedge writing (that I can't remember the English name for right now). But I don't know enough about runes to really even guess on it. See ya Every linguistic anthropology class I've ever taken (and my brother's entire study of Near and Middle Eastern history (he specialized in linguistics). Linguistic anthropologists *love* talking about pidgeon and creole as ways to study migration and intermixing of cultures. No offence, but I'd definitely like to see the sources you're basing your comments on. Nox I don't think going about this with the scientific card is going to help. It's what people do that matters. What do they do if they are racist? Do they attack people because of it? If they do argue it on a moral point. See ya On 11/26/06, Zenophon Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED]thisiswar3005%40yahoo.com wrote: Hi, I think the bottom line is if we really don't want to see others harmed or cause harm to them -- for whatever silly color or sex reason (there's no scientific support for the idea of race divisions amoung humans) -- we need to take up vlog arms agains the action. We need to be the breakwater. Even if we take the draconian step of accusing those who are that way of being mentally ill. An approach the American Psyciatric Association has discussed and is close to adopting. The claim of 40 percent of their members is that racism is a mental illness. Z --- Gena [EMAIL PROTECTED] compumavengal%40earthlink.net wrote: That's part of my problem on trying to find video ways to express the root causes. It is not just skin, but gender, sexual orientation, nationality, age, beauty, celebrity worship... Fox-TV has built its reputation not on true conservative values but by pitting 1/2 of the nation against the other 1/2 that does not think, look or have the same opinions. Define the other as being less than you are or less loyal and you are working the isms. Rush has made $$$ by having so-called humor and commentary at the expense of Latinos, Asians and African-Americans. I am not for censorship. Hate it. But look at the body of his work and tell me that a certain level of society permission was given to think and feel that way. Michael Richards did not blow up in isolation. The Rev that fought gay marriage only to be found humping his way to heaven with a male hooker with side order of meth did not live in isolation. Foley, Gibson, and a bunch more. I got the question but I don't want to fire up this group in that direction. Not my point. I got other questions that are harder to videotape - if there is (and there is) systemic isms embeded in our culture how do you show that to people? Heck of a week. Be careful out there, Gena --- In videoblogging
Re: [videoblogging] Example of how video could change things
Hello, That's a good example of one of the problems with Flash video players versus actual video. You can't save and preserve Flash video players. But you can save and preserve actual video files. See ya On 11/25/06, R. Kristiansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FYI, there is a copy of the media here, it seems:: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JGlvEcPmug I have watched through it, and it seems like it is identical with the original file on youtube. Thank heaven someone is spreading the media out there. Best, Raymond M. Kristiansen dltq.org On 11/26/06, Lisa Harper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone save it? I tried forwarding it to someone today and got the same message from Youtube... Lisa On 11/25/06, Richard (Show) Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]richard%40richardshow.com wrote: Interewsting ... says video removed by user ... On 11/17/06, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] jay.dedman%40gmail.com jay.dedman%40gmail.com wrote: Some of you may have read how a recent California student was tasered by security guards lets see how the story plays out. Text: http://www.nysun.com/article/43718 UCLA Officer Shocks Student With Stun Gun A UCLA police officer shocked a student with a stun gun at a campus library after he refused repeated requests to show student identification and wouldn't leave, police said. The student, Mostafa Tabatabainejad, was shocked Tuesday at about 11 p.m. as police did a routine check of student IDs at the University of California , Los Angeles Powell Library computer lab. Video: http://youtube.com/watch?v=m3GstYOIc0I Now.. text is extremely important because it allows us to discuss the depth and subtleties of a story. But just watch the video taken by a fellow student using her videophone and uploaded to the web. The video shows the real drama behind the incident that usually gets washed over in text stories. Jay -- Me http://www.momentshowing.net My Book http://tinyurl.com/e6cap SF community http://RyanIsHungry.com Community Capitalism http://HaveMoneyWillVlog.com Educate http://node101.org Collaboration http://spinxpress.com Call now to activate 917 371 6790 -- http://richardhhall.org http://richardshow.com -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/
Re: [videoblogging] Example of how video could change things
Hey Harold, On 11/20/06, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I was in that library last week; as usual, nobody asked for any type of identification or anything. I've no complaint about that; I'm just noting the fact. I've been in this library perhaps a hundred times since I graduated, and don't recall an occasion in which I was carded. Perhaps the library is open to the public; I don't know. Just an FYI for anyone interested here. This an interesting story, to say the least, and I appreciate your making us aware of it, Jay. IMO, there's probably a bit of (or perhaps alot of) useful information we're not getting here. I've seen some of the characters who hang out in this library (me, for example!) -- and on campus, in general -- and though the campus *feels* quite safe, there are enough homeless hanging around to have the UCPD patrol the library from time to time. I'm not trying to generalize about the homeless here, many of whom I talk to regularly -- but some of my homeless friends are somewhat touched, so to speak. Certainly they can be distracting to anyone trying to study -- if not downright unpleasant to be around. (Take my schizophrenic fellow, calm on most days, punching ghosts on others.) What I think is important here is perhaps the most obvious: that this story demonstrates how personal video can fill in the gaps, to a certain extent, on many events -- but that does not imply that video records the Truth. I'm not sure what you mean here. How could that video show anything but the truth. (You don't believe it to be a fake do you?) Are you saying that people might assume extra things not shown in the video? Or am I misunderstanding you? See ya Video can certainly provide more information regarding an event, yet it can also dramatize and perhaps skew perception of the event. By no means, however, would I advocate suppressing this time of evidence; I simply feel that it should be accepted with a grain of salt. It's too easy to be swayed by video, allowing it to hold more weight than other evidence. My opinion, Harold http://somethingthathappened.com On 11/20/06, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh, my. I've spent many long hours in that very library... Harold On 11/17/06, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some of you may have read how a recent California student was tasered by security guards lets see how the story plays out. Text: http://www.nysun.com/article/43718 UCLA Officer Shocks Student With Stun Gun A UCLA police officer shocked a student with a stun gun at a campus library after he refused repeated requests to show student identification and wouldn't leave, police said. The student, Mostafa Tabatabainejad, was shocked Tuesday at about 11 p.m. as police did a routine check of student IDs at the University of California , Los Angeles Powell Library computer lab. Video: http://youtube.com/watch?v=m3GstYOIc0I Now.. text is extremely important because it allows us to discuss the depth and subtleties of a story. But just watch the video taken by a fellow student using her videophone and uploaded to the web. The video shows the real drama behind the incident that usually gets washed over in text stories. Jay -- Me http://www.momentshowing.net My Book http://tinyurl.com/e6cap SF community http://RyanIsHungry.com Community Capitalism http://HaveMoneyWillVlog.com Educate http://node101.org Collaboration http://spinxpress.com Call now to activate 917 371 6790 -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Example of how video could change things
Hello Marty, On 11/17/06, Marty Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My question is... How in the heck was this guy supposed to stand up after being tazered for as long as he was? When I have seen tazers used they have not been held to the person for any length of time but they have been quick shocks that essentially floor the person. How can someone stand after that? In fairness, we do not see what brought the police to the library. Someone there had to believe his activity was suspect before the cops arrived unless the police are being SUPER AGGRESSIVE and HUNTING in university libraries now. Unfortunately that's not the only thing that will cause police to come after you. (Not sure if the police in the states have this, but in Canada...) the police have profiles they go by and quotas that they are very strongly motiviated to obey. If you live in an area that the police deem bad you can incur this type of attack from them. See ya My stomach is turning...this is sad to see. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Gena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just saw the video. I'm just sick about this. There had to be a better way to handle this. Most California colleges and universities have a policy that allows the public to use libraries up to a certain cut off time. There are some that also allow computer room access like UCLA. If he was not a student then he should not have been in the building. But my god a tazer is a gun, an electronic gun. If they didn't have the tazer would they have shot him three+ times with bullets? I hate cell phones but I'm starting to warm up to cell phones with video capabilities. Document every dadgum thing and then some. One last thing. Be *real* careful about shooting around LAPD or any PD. For your own safety, be discreet and when it is possible to do so leave and upload the tape. My heart is filled with sorrow. Gena --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman jay.dedman@ wrote: Some of you may have read how a recent California student was tasered by security guards lets see how the story plays out. Text: http://www.nysun.com/article/43718 UCLA Officer Shocks Student With Stun Gun A UCLA police officer shocked a student with a stun gun at a campus library after he refused repeated requests to show student identification and wouldn't leave, police said. The student, Mostafa Tabatabainejad, was shocked Tuesday at about 11 p.m. as police did a routine check of student IDs at the University of California , Los Angeles Powell Library computer lab. Video: http://youtube.com/watch?v=m3GstYOIc0I Now.. text is extremely important because it allows us to discuss the depth and subtleties of a story. But just watch the video taken by a fellow student using her videophone and uploaded to the web. The video shows the real drama behind the incident that usually gets washed over in text stories. Jay -- Me http://www.momentshowing.net My Book http://tinyurl.com/e6cap SF community http://RyanIsHungry.com Community Capitalism http://HaveMoneyWillVlog.com Educate http://node101.org Collaboration http://spinxpress.com Call now to activate 917 371 6790 -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/
Re: [videoblogging] Zune vs iPod Shuffle
LOL :-) That part at the end is hilarious. See ya On 11/18/06, Lisa Harper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Apologies if this has been around... but it's really extremely funny at the end. Hard to believe this was CNN... http://youtube.com/watch?v=3O1y8-hDK8E -- Lisa Harper lisaharper.org -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: free video editors
Hello Aldon, On 11/17/06, Aldon Hynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've used Jahshaka before. Some of the UI seems non-intuitive to me. (Like how to put clips on the time line.) The UI on Jahshaka seemed so non-intuitive to me that I spent a bit of time trying to figure it out and finally gave up. Jahshaka looks like it is very powerful and if someone has managed to write a good simple 'How to get started with Jahshaka' I would love to see it. Until then, I'll probably remain with Windows Movie Maker. . I found this very useful in learning Jahshaka... http://users.pandora.be/acp/jah/ -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] under control
Hello Adam, What kind of database server are you using? MySQL? Postgres? SQLite? Oracle? Something else? (I don't think the repair command are the same across all of them.) Looking forward... you could try backing up your database automatically. (I'm very familiar with MySQL... so if you are using that I could help set something up for it.) Also... something else to consider is the backup stuff that was being discussed in the I.Hate.Blogger thread (on the Videoblogging Mailing List). Refer to these... http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/message/52143 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/message/52155 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/message/52157 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/message/52168 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/message/52171 Doing something like what is described there could allow a kind of universal vlog backup application to be able to backup any vlog... without needing direct access to the database. See ya On 11/17/06, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris and I are working on thepan.org site. All things are fucked right now, feeds included. If you want to watch The PAN, go to http://thepan-org.blip.tv If anyone knows anything about retrieving lost sql data, I could use some tips. I'm hoping there's a cache somewhere. Thanks, AQ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] under control
Hello Adam, You use the a (for all) option. (Just an FYI... hidden directories or files start with a period... with a .) So, you might type something like... ls -alF NOTE... these backups will likely NOT be on your server. They will probably be on a tape that's stored in a safe or a locker. You'll have to ask them for the backup. See ya On 11/17/06, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A better question is, what unix command lists hidden directories? On 11/17/06, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] quirk%40thepan.org wrote: Hi Charles, Im using mySQL on Dreamhost. The support docs mention that they do a nightly backup of all databases. The problem is, I don't know where to look for them. They are accessible via the admin panel at dreamhost, but only the databases that still exist. I need to access a snapshot of a database that was deleted. Not even sure if that's possible. Any clues as to where they might store the snapshot? They take snapshots of the domains too, and store them in a folder at the root called .snapshot Thanks for the help, Adam On 11/17/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]supercanadian%40gmail.com wrote: Hello Adam, What kind of database server are you using? MySQL? Postgres? SQLite? Oracle? Something else? (I don't think the repair command are the same across all of them.) Looking forward... you could try backing up your database automatically. (I'm very familiar with MySQL... so if you are using that I could help set something up for it.) Also... something else to consider is the backup stuff that was being discussed in the I.Hate.Blogger thread (on the Videoblogging Mailing List). Refer to these... http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/message/52143 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/message/52155 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/message/52157 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/message/52168 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/message/52171 Doing something like what is described there could allow a kind of universal vlog backup application to be able to backup any vlog... without needing direct access to the database. See ya On 11/17/06, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] bullemhead%40gmail.combullemhead% 40gmail.com wrote: Chris and I are working on thepan.org site. All things are fucked right now, feeds included. If you want to watch The PAN, go to http://thepan-org.blip.tv If anyone knows anything about retrieving lost sql data, I could use some tips. I'm hoping there's a cache somewhere. Thanks, AQ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ __ Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ __ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] under control
Hello Adam, They probably have them on tape backup that's not accesable via any web interface. (Old tape backups are probably stored in a safe or a locker or something.) You'll probably have to ask them for it. (Via e-mail or whatever issue tracker they have.) So... basically ask them for the backup for the day before the crash. See ya On 11/17/06, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Charles, Im using mySQL on Dreamhost. The support docs mention that they do a nightly backup of all databases. The problem is, I don't know where to look for them. They are accessible via the admin panel at dreamhost, but only the databases that still exist. I need to access a snapshot of a database that was deleted. Not even sure if that's possible. Any clues as to where they might store the snapshot? They take snapshots of the domains too, and store them in a folder at the root called .snapshot Thanks for the help, Adam On 11/17/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]supercanadian%40gmail.com wrote: Hello Adam, What kind of database server are you using? MySQL? Postgres? SQLite? Oracle? Something else? (I don't think the repair command are the same across all of them.) Looking forward... you could try backing up your database automatically. (I'm very familiar with MySQL... so if you are using that I could help set something up for it.) Also... something else to consider is the backup stuff that was being discussed in the I.Hate.Blogger thread (on the Videoblogging Mailing List). Refer to these... http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/message/52143 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/message/52155 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/message/52157 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/message/52168 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/message/52171 Doing something like what is described there could allow a kind of universal vlog backup application to be able to backup any vlog... without needing direct access to the database. See ya On 11/17/06, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] bullemhead%40gmail.combullemhead% 40gmail.com wrote: Chris and I are working on thepan.org site. All things are fucked right now, feeds included. If you want to watch The PAN, go to http://thepan-org.blip.tv If anyone knows anything about retrieving lost sql data, I could use some tips. I'm hoping there's a cache somewhere. Thanks, AQ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ __ Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ __ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Example of how video could change things
I'm speechless. On 11/17/06, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some of you may have read how a recent California student was tasered by security guards lets see how the story plays out. Text: http://www.nysun.com/article/43718 UCLA Officer Shocks Student With Stun Gun A UCLA police officer shocked a student with a stun gun at a campus library after he refused repeated requests to show student identification and wouldn't leave, police said. The student, Mostafa Tabatabainejad, was shocked Tuesday at about 11 p.m. as police did a routine check of student IDs at the University of California , Los Angeles Powell Library computer lab. Video: http://youtube.com/watch?v=m3GstYOIc0I Now.. text is extremely important because it allows us to discuss the depth and subtleties of a story. But just watch the video taken by a fellow student using her videophone and uploaded to the web. The video shows the real drama behind the incident that usually gets washed over in text stories. Jay -- Me http://www.momentshowing.net My Book http://tinyurl.com/e6cap SF community http://RyanIsHungry.com Community Capitalism http://HaveMoneyWillVlog.com Educate http://node101.org Collaboration http://spinxpress.com Call now to activate 917 371 6790 -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] MySpace sued by Universal Music
Hello, (These new Yahoo e-mail ads make it so I can't even reply to the messages inline now... but anyways...) I wasn't aware that uploading was illegal. I thought it was only the sharing that was illegal. See ya On 11/17/06, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6160414.stm Universal Music Group is suing MySpace - claiming the online social network site is encouraging its users to illegally share music and music videos. It accuses MySpace of allowing people to illegally upload videos and of providing the technology for users to share the content with others. Universal are going to war or doing deals on many fronts these days it seems! Steve Elbows -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] free video editors
Hello David, I've used Jahshaka before. Some of the UI seems non-intuitive to me. (Like how to put clips on the time line.) But it's alight. (And seems powerful.) See ya On 11/16/06, David King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm poking around google, looking at free, open source video editors. So just curious: anyone ever use Jahshaka or LiVES, and do you like them? Any others that are good? Thanks! -- David King davidleeking.com - blog davidleeking.com/etc - videoblog [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: I. Hate. Blogger.
Hello Erik, Is there any way to get the database to dump the data to disk. Is the is, you could SCP or SFTP that over. See ya On 11/15/06, Eric Skiff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: unfortunately, SFTP backup of stuff at blogger (if you have access to it) wouldn't back up the info in the database (IE, all your blog entries) as far as I understand it. With wget, you'd at least get the text of your entries, but you'd have to re-enter all of that into whatever software you transition to. I'm pretty sure there are some blogger - wordpress conversion tools, but I don't know too much about them. Is anyone here a blogger guru? What are your options for extracting your entries for backup or import elsewhere? Thanks -E On 11/15/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]supercanadian%40gmail.com wrote: Hello Harold, scp and sftp would be better (for backup purposes) than wget or curl, since they get the actual server-side files. The main thing is to make it automatic though. (So if you've got automatic backups going with scp or sftp already... then that's better.) See ya On 11/14/06, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]harold.johnson%40gmail.com harold.johnson%40gmail.com wrote: I'm all over wget and curl, Charles -- though I always forget how to use them! (And for some strange reason man is not working on my OS X system -- you know, the 'man' command?) Does those commands do a better backup job than using something like sftp or scp? Since I sometimes forget how to use command line tools, I often turn to whatever's available in the GUI world. For example, there's a great open source (free) SFTP and SCP program called Fugu that I used for my most recent backup job; it's based on the sftp and scp commands. Harold http://videoharold.com What were the options for that command again? On 11/14/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]supercanadian%40gmail.com supercanadian%40gmail.com supercanadian%40gmail.com wrote: Hey Harold, If you're comfortable using command line tools, you could use wget or curl to backup your site. (Although that would only get static files, and not server side scripts... but if you site is Blogger based, then that shouldn't really be a problem.) See ya On 11/14/06, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]harold.johnson%40gmail.com harold.johnson%40gmail.com harold.johnson%40gmail.com harold.johnson%40gmail.com wrote: Backup everything first, Gena. Then you won't have to worry about switching over to the new(er) Blogger. (Yeah, I know -- it's easier said than done. I can hardly get myself to backup anything.) Harold http://videoharold.com Backin' it up On 11/13/06, Gena [EMAIL PROTECTED]compumavengal%40earthlink.net compumavengal%40earthlink.net compumavengal%40earthlink.net compumavengal%40earthlink.net compumavengal%40earthlink.net wrote: I had problems posting tonight. I had just uploaded a bunch of stuff and got a couple of error messages. I was locked into reload index mode for about 10 minutes. I've been holding off on switching to the new Blogger. But it might be time to make the leap. I just don't like doing the first generation of new software. Naw that ain't it. Moving. All that stuff. If I lose something it is gone. Yeah, not cool but inevitable. But not today, Gena http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com http://pcclibtech.blogspot.com For Newbies, additional vlogging help resource http://voxmedia.org/wiki/Video --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroup s.com, missbhavens1969 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, I know, I know: you get what you don't pay for. But it doesn't mean I have to like it. Bekah -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ http://changelog.ca/ __ Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ __ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca
Re: [videoblogging] Re: I. Hate. Blogger.
Hello, You know, another way of backing up the system in a good way would be if you used some Semantic HTML in your Blogger template. (I believe that it would be actually pretty simple to do if you put them into your template. So you template would automagically do this for you.) So... for example, in the HTML code (using HTML class names or something) you could mark what the title is, what the body is, what the video is, what the thumbnail is, etc etc. And then you could have some software that automatically runs and backs up your stuff. (Basically just scrapping it off the website without needing access to the database.) Actually... I could write the software pretty easily. So... if any one is interested... we could come up with a way of adding Semantic HTML to vlog posts. And I could write software for people to use to backup their stuff. (It would be pretty easy actually.) Let me know if anyone is interesting. See ya On 11/15/06, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've done the Blogger - WordPress migration a couple of times, with mixed results. Apparently, recent versions of WordPress (2.0 and above) provide better methods for migrating from Blogger. I've yet to make the decision to do so with somethingthathappened.com yet, though... Harold On 11/15/06, Eric Skiff [EMAIL PROTECTED] glitchcast%40gmail.com wrote: unfortunately, SFTP backup of stuff at blogger (if you have access to it) wouldn't back up the info in the database (IE, all your blog entries) as far as I understand it. With wget, you'd at least get the text of your entries, but you'd have to re-enter all of that into whatever software you transition to. I'm pretty sure there are some blogger - wordpress conversion tools, but I don't know too much about them. Is anyone here a blogger guru? What are your options for extracting your entries for backup or import elsewhere? Thanks -E On 11/15/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]supercanadian%40gmail.com supercanadian%40gmail.com wrote: Hello Harold, scp and sftp would be better (for backup purposes) than wget or curl, since they get the actual server-side files. The main thing is to make it automatic though. (So if you've got automatic backups going with scp or sftp already... then that's better.) See ya On 11/14/06, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]harold.johnson%40gmail.com harold.johnson%40gmail.com harold.johnson%40gmail.com wrote: I'm all over wget and curl, Charles -- though I always forget how to use them! (And for some strange reason man is not working on my OS X system -- you know, the 'man' command?) Does those commands do a better backup job than using something like sftp or scp? Since I sometimes forget how to use command line tools, I often turn to whatever's available in the GUI world. For example, there's a great open source (free) SFTP and SCP program called Fugu that I used for my most recent backup job; it's based on the sftp and scp commands. Harold http://videoharold.com What were the options for that command again? On 11/14/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]supercanadian%40gmail.com supercanadian%40gmail.com supercanadian%40gmail.com supercanadian%40gmail.com wrote: Hey Harold, If you're comfortable using command line tools, you could use wget or curl to backup your site. (Although that would only get static files, and not server side scripts... but if you site is Blogger based, then that shouldn't really be a problem.) See ya On 11/14/06, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]harold.johnson%40gmail.com harold.johnson%40gmail.com harold.johnson%40gmail.com harold.johnson%40gmail.com harold.johnson%40gmail.com wrote: Backup everything first, Gena. Then you won't have to worry about switching over to the new(er) Blogger. (Yeah, I know -- it's easier said than done. I can hardly get myself to backup anything.) Harold http://videoharold.com Backin' it up On 11/13/06, Gena [EMAIL PROTECTED]compumavengal%40earthlink.net compumavengal%40earthlink.net compumavengal%40earthlink.net compumavengal%40earthlink.net compumavengal%40earthlink.net compumavengal%40earthlink.net wrote: I had problems posting tonight. I had just uploaded a bunch of stuff and got a couple of error messages. I was locked into reload index mode for about 10 minutes. I've been holding off on switching to the new Blogger. But it might be time to make the leap. I just don't like doing the first generation of new software. Naw that ain't it. Moving. All that stuff. If I lose something it is gone
Re: [videoblogging] Youtube sends ceasedesist letter to techcrunch over video download utility!
Hello, I believe that the Creative Commons people are going to have a big problem with this. (Not sure in if this is only in CC 3.0. Or in the current CC too, but) Prior to this YouTube was NOT violating the CC's anti-TPM -- the anti-anti-circumvention clause -- because although it was difficult to save and download CC'ed videos from YouTube, it wasn't impossible and wasn't believed to be illegal. See... http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2006-October/004297.html With this however, YouTube would be violating the CC. See ya On 11/15/06, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: More craziness: http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/15/huh-youtube-sends-techcrunch-a-cease-desist/ http://tinyurl.com/ssoh7 The offense we committed was creating a small tool that lets people download YouTube videos to their hard drives. We referenced the tool in a recent post that walked people through the process of moving YouTube Videos to their iPod. We created the tool only after a careful review of YouTube's Terms of Use, which state If you download or print a copy of the Content for personal use, you must retain all copyright and other proprietary notices contained therein. The letter, however, states The YouTube's Terms of Use also allows users to access videos only through the functionality of the YouTube website via streaming on the Web, and it disallows the functionality of downloading videos. Not only am I unable to find that language in YouTube's Terms of Use, it directly conflicts with the language I did find and quoted above. Steve Elbows -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Blog Software
Hello Rick, On 11/15/06, Rick Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there an open source/free type blogging software package that works with Coldfusion or ASP.net systems and has similar functionality as wordpress? This would include posting security functions. Not that it doesn't necessarily exist... but... you are more likely to find Free and open source software in languages that have Free and open source implementations. That's part of the reason why there's so much Free and open source web applications, like blogging software, written in PHP. That's because the PHP software is Free and open source. And runs on other Free and open source software, like Apache and Linux. Same with Python and Perl. ASP.net is being implemented by the Mono Project http://www.mono-project.com/, but last I heard Mono's Free and open source implementation of ASP.net was release ready. So, without that... you're probably not going to see very much Free and open source web applications written in ASP.net (as compared to say PHP). I don't think there's are any (active) attempts at implementing and Free and open source version of ColdFusion, so... it's even worse than with ASP.net. However, that does NOT mean none exists. Here's some open source ColdFusion software... http://cfopen.org/softwaremap/trove_list.php?form_cat=87 And look around here for some open source ASP.net software... http://developer.novell.com/wiki/index.php/Project_Hosting Also Do a search (using your favorite search engine) and you'll probably come up with more stuff. (Look for coldfusion opensource or asp opensource etc.) See ya -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: I. Hate. Blogger.
Hey Harold, You are correct that (technically) Semantic HTML is part of the semantic web. (However... just to avoid confusion I should say... when many many people talk about the Semantic Web, they are talking about RDF. I am NOT talking about RDF. I'm talking about a part of the semantic web that has nothing to do with RDF... just Semantic HTML.) The first thing to realize is that Semantic HTML is just regular HTML. You're just making use of features that were always there. (You might already be using them and not even know you are writing Semantic HTML.) And BTW... semantics is just a fancy word for meaning. If I were to ask, what are the semantics of this?... I would be asking, what does this mean? So here's some Semantic HTML you are already probably familiar with You can specify that a thing is a paragraph with the p element. So for example... p This is a paragraph. Simple, eh?! /p (Anyone who has ever written something like that has written Semantic HTML.) Also, if you are quoting something, you can use the blockquote element or the q element. For example... p John said, qhello Jane/q. /p If you want to add a bit more semantics, you could specify where John said that. Imagine if he said it online, maybe in a chat session or something, and there is a log of it at http://example.com/chatlog/123;, then we could write... p John said, q cite=http://example.com/chatlog/123;hello Jane/q. /p There are ALOT more HTML elements that give all sorts of semantics. I won't enumerate them all, but hopefully that gives you some idea of it. So having said that... what if there is no HTML element to express what you are trying to say? What then? Well, HTML has a way of dealing with this. HTML provides the class attribute for this. For example, what if we wanted an HTML element to specify an article. There's no article element. So we could do something like this... div class=article Blah blah blah. /div (div and span are kind of blank' elements. They're useful when you want to kind of to make your own HTML elements.) Now... some people might be thinking, wait... the class attribute is only for styling. I used to think that myself. Well, it is true that the class attribute can be used for styling. BUT... it can be used for adding semantics too -- for adding meaning too. It's in the HTML spec!... and many people use it that way. (That's part of what the Microformats thing is all about.) And here's an example that appears on ALOT of webpages (according to a Google report)... div class=footer Blah blah blah. /div Many many many people on the web specify the footer like that (because there is no footer element). Here's another example that's a bit more complex. What if I wanted an element that I could use to specify PHP code. Well, there's the code element. But that doesn't say it is PHP code. However, I could do something like the following... code class=php$x = file_get_contents(http://example.com/it.html );/code Here I used an existing non-blank HTML element and added a class name to it to specify the semantics I wanted. (That's kind of the basics of Semantic HTML. If I didn't explain things well enough and it's still a bit unclear... let me know and I can explain it more.) So getting back to our vlogging stuff. We'd need to either use existing HTML elements or use HTML class names to give meaning -- to give semantics -- to vlog posts. Things like: the title, the summary, the video(s), the thumnails, etc etc. Basically we'd need to figure out what existing HTML elements people could use and pick some class names for things where we need a bit more semantics than HTML provides already. That way a machines... like backup software... could find all the important stuff. Did I explain that well enough? On 11/15/06, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know anything about Semantic HTML, nor the Semantic Web (which I'm assuming is related; please correct me if I'm wrong), but this *sounds* like a really good thing. Still, do you mind explaining it a bit more, or pointing in the direction of more info.? Perhaps doing so will generate more interest and besides, wouldn't want you to go to all the trouble unless I (or anyone else) really knows what you're talking about... Harold Sniffing around Wikipedia for more on Semantic HTML... http://somethingthathappened.com On 11/15/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]supercanadian%40gmail.com wrote: Hello, You know, another way of backing up the system in a good way would be if you used some Semantic HTML in your Blogger template. (I believe that it would be actually pretty simple to do if you put them into your template. So you template would automagically do this for you.) So... for example, in the HTML code (using HTML class names or something) you could mark what
Re: [videoblogging] From The Bowels Of YouTube
Hello, On 11/6/06, Kent Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just received this from someone on YouTube: Dear Popular YouTuber, I'm a very popular viral video maker on YouTube, though my identity will remain anonymous for now. This letter seeks to enlighten and embolden you. I want you to stop giving your time and labor to YouTube for free. There's no reason YouTube should be bought for 1.65 billion dollars and you not receive a cent. There's no reason YouTube should be able to sell millions of dollars in advertising around your videos and you not receive a cent. Currently you are being exploited, which is not uncommon in American business practices; there exists a long history of worker exploitation here, from slavery, to factory worker abuses, to the constant battle for a livable minimum wage. In every situation, workers have had to fight for fairness and respect. Keep the following idea in your mind throughout this process: YouTube is nothing without the community and its leaders. You're more valuable than you can imagine. List of other relevant points: 1. YouTube has never publicly acknowledged that original content creators on its site should be compensated for their work. 2. They've never even hinted at it. 3. And they never will because they believe that their business works best by receiving free labor to maximize profit (unless they're forced). 4. They will earn profit on your back as long as they can 5. YouTube is a for profit company they don't exist foremost to serve the user, they exist foremost to earn profit 6. Google has a notorious reputation of uneven relationships, basically asserting a bullish attitude in everything they do. You need us, we don't need you, would be a more accurate mission statement for them. 7. YouTube will soon adhere to the same philosophy 8. YouTube itself is not an emotional experience and you should feel no loyalty to them. You don't have a vested interest in their success. You may feel like you do but you should not delude yourself. Most of the emotional connection you feel should be directed toward your fans and the original content creators whose videos you've loved. 9. YouTube is just a name, a website on your monitor, and computer software and hardware. The following is an analogy that Chad Hurley once used: we are the stage for Internet media to display itself. This statement misleads and deceives. YouTube sells ads where a theatre owner sells tickets. The big difference is that a theatre owner takes those ticket sales, as well as concession and memorabilia sales and pays the performers. YouTube sells tickets, concessions, and memorabilia but keeps all the money for themselves. There are many more relevant points to be made here, but they can wait. The most important thing to know right now is that some partners and I are creating a video hosting site like YouTube that will share its revenue with you/the community/original content creators. The main difference between YouTube and us is that they are founded on exploitation where we are founded on fairness and equality. We put your success first and will only make money after you do. This will include revenue from click ads, impression ads, special promotions, co-branding, commercials, product placement, etc. In other words, you will be rewarded from every revenue source the company has. And rightly so, as this entire phenomenon is about you. Sadly, somewhere along the way YouTube made this about them. And make no mistake, we will be no Revver. We have an interface and functionality that is better than YouTube's. We have many, many friends in the media world that are partnering with us, thus you will be allowed to post clips of your favorite shows and music. For now, we ask that you make no changes to your practices. Simply respond to this email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kool... people are using the name NewTube :-) http://changelog.ca/log/2005/10/15/iptv_needs-a-new_name_-_how_about_newtube See ya Include your user name, your real name, your e-mail address, and a very brief statement confirming that you agree that YouTube is exploitative and that you will move your efforts to a new site that is founded on fairness. Also, it is imperative that you don't share this letter or any of its contents with anyone. Our collective success depends on it. Best Regards -Kent, askaninja.com -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your
Re: [videoblogging] andreas in the economist
Hello, Does this mean we could see SMIL getting popular? (SMIL is Hypervideo BTW. Has been for a LONG TIME.) See ya On 9/25/06, trine bjørkmann berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From hypertext to hypervideo Sep 21st 2006 From The Economist print edition Software: New technology that links together segments of online video delights viewers, vloggers and video-on-demand vendors THE rise of the web transformed hypertextwhich allows readers to click on a word in one document and be transported to anotherfrom an obscure concept in computer science to a familiar, everyday technology. Might hypervideowhich lets viewers click on a moving image to call up a related clipbe on the verge of a similar transformation? This nascent development, also called video-hyperlinking, makes it easy to link together segments of online video in novel ways. Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen, a video blogger (or vlogger) based in Aalborg, Denmark, who likes to video-hyperlink clips on his website, says the technology is a vlogger's dream. full story.. https://www.economist.com/science/tq/displayStory.cfm?story_id=7904166 -- + http://trine.blogs.com+ -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ ___ Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing... http://tirebiterz.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] In FireAnt, my feed isn't working correctly.
Hello,On 6/3/06, pacfolly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now, I just downloaded Fireant... I should of a long time ago! Itsgreat... but when I subscribed to my feed (just to test it out),instead of getting links to download videos, I only got links to viewmy posts... not only that but the date published shows up as 1/1/2000 for all my posts. What am I doing wrong? :(My Feed is:http://feeds.feedburner.com/pacfollyMy Vlog is: http://pacfolly.blogspot.com/Thanks in advance for your help... I tried to be as specific aspossible in describing my issue : )It's not working because... your feed does NOT have an enclosures. ( I.e., you feed does NOT have any RSS enclosure elements. These are basically the things that tell FireAnt and other software that there is a video there to get.) I did notice that you use rel-enclosure in your posts, so Feedburner should be picking those up and turning them into RSS enclosure's. But it isn't. So my guess is that you need to configure Feedburner a bit to do that. See ya-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.comdeveloper weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Idea: New microformat: rel=media:thumbnail
Hello Andres,On 5/30/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 31 May 2006 01:45:24 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Although rel-enclosure is enough to tell you it is an enclosure (for all or part of the document it is contained within) is NOT enough to tell you that what it points to is a video. To do that you'd could use the a type attribute, as in... a href="" type=video/mpeg.../aI have been using the type attribute in combination with rel-enclosuresince 2004. I know it exists. I also know that it's a *hint* to what might be expected at the end of a link ( URL:http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/links.html#adef-type-A ). If you wantto know the content-type do a HEAD request, as a parser you can't trust the type attribute.In my case (with my _javascript_ thing) everything is done in browser. And although one can do an HTTP HEAD request in some cases using XmlHttpRequest. It can't be done when the video is on a different domain. I use it to generate nicer archive pages on my blog so readers can seewhat types of enclosures are included before clicking on. Example: URL: http://www.solitude.dk/archives/2006_05.php However, that is NOT even enough.Consider this example a href="" type=application/ogg.../a In this case you don't know if the Ogg file contains video, audio, text, or what?(Ogg, like QuickTime, Matroska, 3GPP, ASF, and others, is a container format that you can put all sort of different types of things into it. And not just video.They don't even have to contain any video.) Thus, another means of semantics is needed.I disagree. It is enough to know that you're looking at OGG content. Content can then be handed off to the player application.In my case (with my _javascript_ thing) everything is done in browser. What is does is give each a that points to a video an onclick handler. (When the link to the video is clicked, it creates a DHTML player to play the video, instead of just going to the video file.) In my case, simply handing things off to the player was NOT a possibility. I needed to be able to determine which a's pointed to a video and which didn't. rel-enclosure wasn't enough (for reasons I described earlier in this thread). The a's type attribute wasn't enough (for reasons I described earlier in this thread). So I used class-video (in the style of SMIL's video element). See ya-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Idea: New microformat: rel=media:thumbnail
Hello,I have a _javascript_ thing in the works that uses semantic HTML like that.In the first version of the script (which coincidentally I'm going to try an release this week... depending on how busy I am with work) you make videos like so... a class=video href="">In the next version, it allows for more semantics, so that you can add thumbnails (as well as width, height, etc), like... span class=video a class=video:href href=""> img class=video:thumbnail src="" / (span class=video:width640/spanxspan class=video:height480/span) /a/spanAfter that, I'm adding the ability to specify alternatives (of the same thing... like if you were to offer a video in mutliple formats or different resolutions, etc). And being able specify a series (where the show is made up of a series of videos,... for example, part 1 or 3, part 2 or 3, part 3 or 3.) (If you want to see an incomplete demo with debug messages everywhere let me know.)See yaOn 5/30/06, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: an idea just hit me out of the blue ... it may be stupid, or it may be already done, but I figured this group could let me know on either ...You know how we have rel=enclosure for links in a post that should be enclosed in a feed ... how about a new micro-format for rel=media:thumbnailrel=media:thumbnail could be added to an image in a post so that this image could be included as the still image for the MRSS extension.services like blip which cross post to your blog could include the rel=media:thumbnail automatically and feedburner could then insert that image into your MRSS info (feedburner already inserts some MRSS in there). I've got a few cool ideas in the back of my head on ways to consume a feed, but a few of them would work far better if I KNEW what image the blogger wanted to use to represent thier video/audio file. This sort of solution would allow for a much broader adoption of the media:thumbnail element in RSS. -- http://www.DavidMeade.comfeed: http://www.DavidMeade.com/feed -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Idea: New microformat: rel=media:thumbnail
Hello,Forgot to mention that you need to specify the type attribute on the a. So, for example, the first example should be:a class=video href="" movie.mpeg type=video/mpeg.../a(And likewise with the second example.)Note, this could be mixed with rel=enclosure to get... a rel=enclosure class=video href="" type=video/mpeg.../a See yaOn 5/30/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello,I have a _javascript_ thing in the works that uses semantic HTML like that.In the first version of the script (which coincidentally I'm going to try an release this week... depending on how busy I am with work) you make videos like so... a class=video href="">In the next version, it allows for more semantics, so that you can add thumbnails (as well as width, height, etc), like... span class=video a class=video:href href=""> img class=video:thumbnail src="" / (span class=video:width640/spanxspan class=video:height480/span) /a/spanAfter that, I'm adding the ability to specify alternatives (of the same thing... like if you were to offer a video in mutliple formats or different resolutions, etc). And being able specify a series (where the show is made up of a series of videos,... for example, part 1 or 3, part 2 or 3, part 3 or 3.) (If you want to see an incomplete demo with debug messages everywhere let me know.)See yaOn 5/30/06, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: an idea just hit me out of the blue ... it may be stupid, or it may be already done, but I figured this group could let me know on either ...You know how we have rel=enclosure for links in a post that should be enclosed in a feed ... how about a new micro-format for rel=media:thumbnailrel=media:thumbnail could be added to an image in a post so that this image could be included as the still image for the MRSS extension.services like blip which cross post to your blog could include the rel=media:thumbnail automatically and feedburner could then insert that image into your MRSS info (feedburner already inserts some MRSS in there). I've got a few cool ideas in the back of my head on ways to consume a feed, but a few of them would work far better if I KNEW what image the blogger wanted to use to represent thier video/audio file. This sort of solution would allow for a much broader adoption of the media:thumbnail element in RSS. -- http://www.DavidMeade.comfeed: http://www.DavidMeade.com/feed -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Idea: New microformat: rel=media:thumbnail
Hello Andreas,Although rel-enclosure is enough to tell you it is an enclosure (for all or part of the document it is contained within) is NOT enough to tell you that what it points to is a video.To do that you'd could use the a type attribute, as in... a href="" type=video/mpeg.../aHowever, that is NOT even enough. Consider this example a href="" type=application/ogg.../aIn this case you don't know if the Ogg file contains video, audio, text, or what? (Ogg, like QuickTime, Matroska, 3GPP, ASF, and others, is a container format that you can put all sort of different types of things into it. And not just video. They don't even have to contain any video.) Thus, another means of semantics is needed.With a _javascript_ thing I have been using I use class-video to mark a video. For example...a class=video href="" type=application/ogg.../a(Note, rel-video would be wrong. In this case class-video is appropriate. If you would like me to elaborate on that let me know.) See yaOn 5/30/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is unnecessary. I have never met a blogger who have put up a thumbnailand then not used it as a link to the video. All you need isrel=enclosure - if that link points to a video resource then you can safely assume that the first image contained in the link is the thumbnail.e.g. a href="" rel=enclosureimg src="" //a- Andreas On Tue, 30 May 2006 23:31:24 +0200, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: an idea just hit me out of the blue ... it may be stupid, or it may be already done, but I figured this group could let me know on either ... You know how we have rel=enclosure for links in a post that should be enclosed in a feed ... how about a new micro-format for rel=media:thumbnail rel=media:thumbnail could be added to an image in a post so that this image could be included as the still image for the MRSS extension. services like blip which cross post to your blog could include the rel=media:thumbnail automatically and feedburner could then insert that image into your MRSS info (feedburner already inserts some MRSS in there). I've got a few cool ideas in the back of my head on ways to consume a feed, but a few of them would work far better if I KNEW what image the blogger wanted to use to represent thier video/audio file.This sort of solution would allow for a much broader adoption of the media:thumbnail element in RSS.--Andreas Haugstrup PedersenURL: http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc .charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Idea: New microformat: rel=media:thumbnail
Hello Joshua,I think that for most vloggers, they won't bother adding semantic HTML (like rel-enclosure, class-video, or anything) unless they get something else out of it. (Or unless it comes out of some tool.) I've been working on a _javascript_ thing that creates a little DHTML player if you use class-video. For example...a class=video href="" type=application/ogg.../a So, people who would use my _javascript_ thing would be incentivized to add a class-video so that the DHTML player works. (That of course would have the added advantage of letting other software understand what is and isn't a video.) But that assumes the vlogger has the skills to do the HTML coding (to add the semantic HTML and bring in the _javascript_ thing).Alternatively, the tools vloggers use to create posts could automagically produce the appropriate semantic HTML. See yaOn 5/30/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is unnecessary. I have never met a blogger who have put up a thumbnail and then not used it as a link to the video. All you need is rel=enclosure - if that link points to a video resource then you can safely assume that the first image contained in the link is the thumbnail. e.g. a href="" rel=enclosureimg src="" //a I only wish people were so consistent and reliable. Truth is thatthere is vast inconsistency in the wild.Many people use text links to point to videos, sometimes they usespecial play button icons to link to videos (not exactly a thumbnail). Sometimes people link to an HTML page with the mediaembedded and somtimes they just embed the media and do not use animage to link to it. In practice relEnclosure is rarely, if ever used.We run into all sorts of problems like this trying to parse HTML descriptions when we aggregate feeds on FireAnt.tv.I don't think adding additional semantic HTML attributes would helpmuch either. Often the bloggers who post with strange HTML conventionsaren't the type of people who know much about HTML. I certainly wouldn't expect them to grok a Microformat like rel=media:thumbnail... but then perhaps broad acceptance is not really the goal of thisproposal anyway.-JoshOn 5/30/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is unnecessary. I have never met a blogger who have put up a thumbnail and then not used it as a link to the video. All you need is rel=enclosure - if that link points to a video resource then you can safely assume that the first image contained in the link is the thumbnail. e.g. a href="" rel=enclosureimg src="" //a - Andreas On Tue, 30 May 2006 23:31:24 +0200, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: an idea just hit me out of the blue ... it may be stupid, or it may be already done, but I figured this group could let me know on either ... You know how we have rel=enclosure for links in a post that should be enclosed in a feed ... how about a new micro-format for rel=media:thumbnail rel=media:thumbnail could be added to an image in a post so that this image could be included as the still image for the MRSS extension. services like blip which cross post to your blog could include the rel=media:thumbnail automatically and feedburner could then insert that image into your MRSS info (feedburner already inserts some MRSS in there). I've got a few cool ideas in the back of my head on ways to consume a feed, but a few of them would work far better if I KNEW what image the blogger wanted to use to represent thier video/audio file.This sort of solution would allow for a much broader adoption of the media:thumbnail element in RSS. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Canadians at Vloggercon (was: Let's finish what we've started!!!) (Was: Re: I'm almost @ Vloggercon)
Hello,On 5/30/06, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I sure am...can't wait.yourself, Anne, myself, Casey and Rudy makes 5...that I am aware of.I've been meaning to ask this question as well. All you Canadians going to vloggercon, sound off.We'll have to make sure we all get together at Schlomo's or something and toast to our Yankee hosts or something. thers also Philip:http://www.swordfight.orgJayI'm Canadian too :-)See ya -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.comdeveloper weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Idea: New microformat: rel=media:thumbnail
Hello Joshua,On 5/30/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that for most vloggers, they won't bother adding semantic HTML (like rel-enclosure, class-video, or anything) unless they get something else out of it.(Or unless it comes out of some tool.)Absolutely! Its very important to show that you can *do* stuff with semantics. That's why we support the image thumbnail format onFireAnt.tv the way that Andreas described it with the hopes ofencouraging people to post images of their videos...However, its still early days, and I think the tools for supporting such standards are still very new. Witness the recent issues withTechnorati tags during Videoblogging Week. Even though its astandard there still seems to be much chaos andnon-interoperability. That's not to say that these things won't grow into something moretangible in the future... I certainly hope so, that's why I'm doingthese things. I've been working on a _javascript_ thing that creates a little DHTML player if you use class-video.For example... a class=video href="" type=application/ogg.../aWhy not go with the existing Microformat, rel=enclosure ? As far as I can tell, rel-enclosure conveys a totally different meaning than class-video.rel-enclosure essentially says the thing, at the end of this link, is attached to this document (that the rel-enclosure is contained within). It does NOT say play it. It does NOT say it is a video. And it does NOT even say prefetch it.Consider this example...a rel=enclosure href="" .../aThere's a rel-enclosure there, but this is a PDF. Certainly we would NOT want to try to play this as a video.You might say, but I know this is a PDF,... of course I'm not going to try and play it as a video. But, Now, what if we didn't put an extension on our file, and instead we had...a rel=enclosure href="">What would we do then? It is still a PDF, but we can't immediately tell. So, we might try using the a's type attribute, and have something like this...a rel=enclosure href="" type=application/pdf.../a But is the type attribute enough. If we had something like any of these, then I'd say yes...a rel=enclosure href="" type=video/mpeg.../a a rel=enclosure href="" type=video/3gpp.../aa rel=enclosure href="" type=video/jpeg.../a But this depends on have all videos have a MIME type of form video/*. But this is NOT always the case. Some videos do NOT have a MIME type of the form video/*. For example... a rel=enclosure href="" type=application/ogg.../aapplication/ogg is the MIME type for Ogg. Ogg, like QuickTime, Matroska, 3GPP, and ASF is container formats. And you can put all sorts of things in them. (And not just necessarily video.) Like text, audio, images, and video too. But a particular file does NOT have to have any video at all. Now, you could claim that videos that don't have a MIME type of the form video/* are messed up and have done something wrong. However, this is a reality that we have to live with it.And eventually, you come back to the question of,... how do you show a link in an HTML file points to a video. (And given you don't see anything wrong with my reasoning and logic) we need something like class-video to show it. So I suggest class-video.See ya-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] youtube has video comments
Hello Jay,On 5/30/06, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steve Garfield just pointed me to this:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kX9A5CqZGhwyou can now leave video comments directly on another video.so that Sexism conversationwe could have right here. i still dont like how YouTube breaks the connection of blogs...and there is a real concern with their licensing (ie will I see myvideo on TV and not be compensated?)but this is cool. I don't much like the idea that YouTube tries to centralize everything on their site.One of the things I like about vlogging and the whole Internet TV thing is that it is very decentralized without any barriers to entry or consumption. See ya-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Idea: New microformat: rel=media:thumbnail
Hello Joshua,On 5/30/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-enclosure-By adding rel=enclosure to a hyperlink, a page indicates that thedestination of that hyperlink is intended to be downloaded and cached. That doesn't reflect what me and others discussed on the Microformats mailing list. I'd give you links to the e-mails in the archive... but I'm too tired right now :-) (And yeah, I know, I saw you over there too. Particularly regarding the rel-payment thing for Atom.) (That should be corrected. Although I'm sure we'll get into an long argument about it over there :-) ) E.g. with the following hyperlink:a href="" href="http://homepage.mac.com/kevinmarks/wwdc2005.mov">http://homepage.mac.com/kevinmarks/wwdc2005.movrel=enclosureWWDC 2005 Keynote with chapters/a the author indicates that the movie should be downloaded.-Doesn't matter whether the link points to a video or a PDF (shouldit?). The type can be specified with the type attribute, or using correct Mime-types on the server (preferred).Like I mentioned before (and as you mention later), a MIME type is NOT always sufficient to tell if something is a video or not. This is because not all videos have a MIME type of the form video/*. One example is Ogg (application/ogg). Although container formats in general will have this problem. (Some container formats have video/* forms though.)Also, systems that shunt themselves via the web will also have this problem. For example, consider this BitTorrent link... http://example.com/show.torrentIt's MIME type is application/x-bittorrent. Now let's say it contains one video: video.mpegNow consider this URI that refers to a video coming from a torrent...http://example.com/show.torrent#video.mpeg Note that I'm using a URI fragment to access what's inside the torrent.I think that this type of thing will continue.Also, given that we are trying to put semantics in the HTML it would suggest to me that keeping a list of non- video/* video MIME types is antithetical to the goals here. Having such a list takes the semantics out of the HTML. I would stick with established Microformat class attributes ratherthan create new ones and thus more deviation and noise. Which Microformat class attributes would you suggest? Seems like application/ogg is quite a fringe case (not even sure ifits generally playable in the browser, unless you are playing it witha VLC browser plugin... which is also pretty rare). I've found that VLC is actually pretty common. (At least in BC, Canada. Everyone seems to use it here. Things may be different globally though.)But I think the whole topic of videos having MIME types NOT of the form video/* is an important one to deal with. (Shunting things via new protocols seems to be out of favor due to the nature of the underlying operating systems. Instead, shunting seems to be done via MIME types now. And this will lead to new non- video/* video MIME types.) You could probably modify your _javascript_ to filter based on acceptedlist of type attributes including video/* and application/ogg and perhaps a handful of other embeddable video formats that useapplication/*... not sure what those might be?My motivation for class-video is to learn fromSMIL. SMIL has a video element. Thus class-video copies that. (This is the Microformat process. Either observe what being done in the wild with HTML and create a semantic HTML specification -- a Microformat -- for it. Or mimic XML paradigms out there. In this case I'm mimicking the XML paradign of SMIL.)See ya -JoshOn 5/30/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hello Joshua, On 5/30/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that for most vloggers, they won't bother adding semantic HTML (like rel-enclosure, class-video, or anything) unless they get something else out of it.(Or unless it comes out of some tool.) Absolutely! Its very important to show that you can *do* stuff with semantics. That's why we support the image thumbnail format on FireAnt.tv the way that Andreas described it with the hopes of encouraging people to post images of their videos... However, its still early days, and I think the tools for supporting such standards are still very new. Witness the recent issues with Technorati tags during Videoblogging Week. Even though its a standard there still seems to be much chaos and non-interoperability. That's not to say that these things won't grow into something more tangible in the future... I certainly hope so, that's why I'm doing these things.I've been working on a _javascript_ thing that creates a little DHTML player if you use class-video.For example... a class=video href="" type=application/ogg.../a Why not go with the existing Microformat, rel=enclosure ? As far as I can tell, rel-enclosure conveys a totally different meaning than class-video. rel-enclosure essentially says the thing, at
Re: [videoblogging] Copying YouTube Videos
Hello,On 5/26/06, LeanBackVids.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This article from O'Reilly's MacDevCenter.com explains how to copyvideos from YouTube.Technically, it is really just searching yourcomputer for the cached file, then copying that from the /tmp folderto your desktop. More info...http://tinyurl.com/gogn7You can also use this... http://keepvid.com/ (I can't remember where I got that link from now, or I'd give credit.) -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Copying YouTube Videos
Hello Steve,I think their whole business model revovles around lock-in. To make it so users have to go to the YouTube site to watch videos. And to make it so authors of videos get stuck using their service.Once they have lock-in, the have a degree of control. And they can use it for selling advertisements. For selling access to the authors (of the videos on the site). For selling access to the viewers. For selling profile information and data on the users. Etc. See yaOn 5/26/06, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just posted a comment on that post.That'sone of the problems with the YouTube site, their terms andconditions.Looking at it from a Creative Commons/Remix Culture pointof view, it stinks! Other sites allow you to post videos with whatever license you want.These other sites PROMOTE remixing and RESUSE.Not YouTube.Not evenif you post a CC licensed work, they then want to restrict a viewersuse?It doesn't seem right. I've emailed them twice about these issues and haven't ever heard back.I guess their Terms of Service state pretty clearly what theirintentions are, combined with how hard htey make it for people to grab theg videos off the site.On May 26, 2006, at 2:55 PM, LeanBackVids.com wrote: This article from O'Reilly's MacDevCenter.com explains how to copy videos from YouTube.Technically, it is really just searching your computer for the cached file, then copying that from the /tmp folder to your desktop. More info... http://tinyurl.com/gogn7 -Matt --Steve--http://SteveGarfield.com - Fighting the good fighthttp://Rocketboom.com - Correspondent http://hipcast.com (formerly audioblog)- Community Manager-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Copying YouTube Videos
Hello,That could change though. (Right now it's to YouTube's advance to allow it.)It similar to how Microsoft turns a blind eye towards pirating of their software when it helps them spread or maintain use of their products (like Windows, Office, etc). Especially when it helps keep out competitors. (For example,... in the IT world you often hear the arguement... why use OpenOffice when you can pirate MS Office.) But, from time to time, they'll start enforcing the rights Copyright law gives them and demanding payment (from government, businesses, and others for pirated software).And then, shortly after that, they turn a blind eye again. They go through cycles. It's almost like farming a crop :-)Microsoft is obviously not the only one who does this. Many many groups do. (They're just an easy example that most people are probably familiar with.) See yaOn 5/26/06, WWWhatsup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was just today reading an old ny times (feb3) thathad an extended feature on youtube.http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/03/arts/music/03yout.html In it it was stated that YouTube remained DMCA compliant, because underthe DMCA if material was *streamed*- one had only to cease streaming atthe first complaint to be free of further liability. That, along with the bolerplate agreement wherby uploaders aver the right to the material, was enough tokeep their noses clean.Thus, while it obviously doesn't help the bottom line,it's ublikely YouTubehas much problem with backdoor downloading as such. jolyAt 03:34 PM 5/26/2006, you wrote:Hello Steve,I think their whole business model revovles around lock-in.To make it so users have to go to the YouTube site to watch videos.And to make it so authors of videos get stuck using their service. Once they have lock-in, the have a degree of control.And they can use it for selling advertisements.For selling access to the authors (of the videos on the site).For selling access to the viewers.For selling profile information and data on the users.Etc. See ya-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Lets test the power of Digg
duggOn 5/25/06, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ive often wondered how influential the Digg effect is.please digg HMWV:http://digg.com/deals/Easy_way_to_fund_Video_Bloggersi want to see if we can create some action. Jay--Adventures in Videoblogginghttp://www.momentshowing.nethttp://FireAnt.tv http://node101.orgCell: 917 371 6790-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Voxmedia wiki: Flash video
Hello,I thought Flash only had about 90% saturation (not 98%).See yaOn 5/22/06, Chuck Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:For anyone who cares, I edited the Voxmedia wiki entry about Flash video. It was extremely biased against Flash IMO:From this:* ''Flash delivery of media''. While we love Flash for lots of reasons, the downside is thatFlash makes it nearly impossible for folks to quote / mashup or otherwise use your work for their own nefarious artistic purposes. If you don't care about nefarious artisticpurposes as defined by the [http://creativecommons.org/ Creative Commons], then Flash is great. It will prevent folks from downloading and distributing your work, just likeRealPlayer.To this:* ''Flash delivery of media''. We love Flash for lots of reasons, mainly because it's installedon 98% of browsers. The downside is that Flash makes it difficult for folks to quote / mashup or otherwise use your work for their own nefarious artistic purposes. Severalvideobloggers are embedding Flash video in their blog, but making a Quicktime versionavailable for the RSS feed and other artistic uses. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are a few good links that have been passed along in this forum ... several are listed on the voxmedia wikik: http://www.voxmedia.org/wiki/Vlogosphere_FAQ#Vlogging_.26_The_Law -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc .charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Voxmedia wiki: Flash video
Hello,I didn't know that On2 made the video codec for Flash 8 On2 is also the ones who originally developed the codec for Ogg Theora.See yaOn 5/23/06, Stan Hirson, Sarah Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Macromedia Flash Player Penetration as of April, 2006 is 97.7%: http://www.adobe.com/products/player_census/flashplayer/penetration.html or http://tinyurl.com/qh7lf -- EnricWhoa!Adobe has been hyping the penetration of what they call Flashwith some very misleading figures.First, there are several generations ofFlash. The current release is Flash 8. Please go this site and seefor yourself:http://www.adobe.com/products/player_census/flashplayer/version_penetrat\ ion.htmlThe 98 per cent -- or thereabouts -- penetration is forearlierversions.Flash 8 has much better quality for streaming than theearlier versions and, in my opinion, is well worth looking into for vlogging.But.And it is a big butt.You need a Flash 8 Player to look at Flash8 video.It is a plugin for the browser, but there have been many,many, problems with the upgrade for IE on Windows for people who are not computer literate.Adobe has been dreadful about promoting the playersfor the general public. I have been dealing with this issue sinceJanuary, 2006.People who have just gotten used to email and Googlesearching are terrified to update because the process is-- to them -- very daunting.You know, people over 30...While many of the visitors to vlogging sites are comfortable with theupdate process, I have found that the great unwashed of the generalpublic gets frustrated with the upgrade process. While it is true that adoption rates for Flash 8 are climbing, none ofthe major aggregators such as Youtube, Google Video, etc. are streamingFlash 8.If you want to see what computer chaos would be like, imagine what would happen if they converted.On2 Technologies, the outfit that licenses the Flash 8 compression codeto Adobe and others helped me with the player problem by putting up asite that will do an express install (no need for user intervention) for all platforms.You are welcome to use it and link to it:http://on2.com/flashtestNow Adobe is making noise about a Flash 9 player coming out very soon.Does that mean that Flash 8 will be replaced?It only came out in September of 2005.If you want to see a comparison of the two versions and an explanationof the player issues (with an updater),you can see how I dealt with it on http://hestakaup.typepad.com/hestablog/2006/02/flash_test.htmlThere are quite a few clips of Flash 8.Stan Hirsonhttp://hestablog.com http://hestakaup.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles Iliya Krempeaux supercanadian@ wrote: Hello, I thought Flash only had about 90% saturation (not 98%).See ya -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.comdeveloper weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] MissleBlast vs. RocketBoom
That's awesome! :-DOn 5/21/06, LeanBackVids.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.missileblast.comvs.http://www.rocketboom.com -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.comdeveloper weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] mac rss feeds?
Hello,You can also use FeedValidator.org to find errors within the RSS file.Here's the URL to check you feed... http://feedvalidator.org/check.cgi?url="">(You can also just go to FeedValidator.org and type in the URL to your feed.)(Note sure if that mac.com stuff let's you fix those problems or not though.)See yaOn 5/20/06, Ben Halverson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi Peter,Change itpc:// to http:// if you look on your archive page you already have a link to it. Its the blue rss iconhttp://web.mac.com/averagesoul/iWeb/AverageSoul/Podcast/Archive.html http://rss.mac.com/averagesoul/iWeb/AverageSoul/Podcast/rss.xmlOn 5/20/06 5:04 PM, Peter Van Dijck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm getting emails from people asking how to turn this (from http://averagesoul.net) itpc://rss.mac.com/averagesoul/iWeb/AverageSoul/Podcast/rss.xml into a real RSS feed. It's the default feed generated by mac accounts, it seems, but it seems locked-in into iTunes? Is there an easy way to turn those into an RSS feed? tnx! Peter-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] New Member with Questions
Hello,Hmmm... did you really mean to link to channel101 twice? Isn't there a channel102 too? Perhaps that what you meant.See yaOn 5/20/06, Tom Gosse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Check out these sites: http://www.channel101.com/ http://www.channel101.com/ Tom Gosse www.dailymotion.com/irishhermit irishhermit.blogspot.com From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of brandenburg_wayne Sent: Saturday, 20 May, 2006 11:52 AM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: [videoblogging] New Member with Questions Hello Everyone, I'm a student at the Academy of Art University in San Francisco, CA. I'm interested in making web episodic shows. I was wondering if anyone here has any good examples of current web episodic shows. I am working on getting my own vlog up as the instructions on the main page of this group suggests. I hope to get my films up so others can see my work. Are there any other aspiring filmmakers here? I'd love to watch your work. I'm of the mindset that one can never stop learning and there is no better teacher than one's peers. Thank you, Wayne-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] AboutURL.com
Hello,On 5/20/06, LeanBackVids.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a great service for analyzing your site...http://www.abouturl.com/That site needs to make it more obvious that you need to click those links below (on the page there) after you click the submit button. (I wonder how many people will be able to get past that usability bug.) See ya-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] FYI: Creative Commons 3.0 coming
Hello,Many vloggers here are using a Creative Commons license for their works. So,Just an FYI for those people.Work has started on version 3.0 of the Creative Commons licenses. http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5908If you want to join in the discussion to help create version 3.0 of the Creative Commons licenses, you can join the discussion here: http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licensesAlso, you can see the start of the discussion (on the mailing list) here: http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2006-May/003557.htmlSee ya -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.comdeveloper weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: You can't save Internet Freedom by taking it away [was: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Lobbyists Trying to Destroy Internet Freedom?]
Hello,On 5/19/06, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Meade wrote: On 5/19/06, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nevertheless, it looks like Charles K. wins this round. The Bill of Rights restricts government power; Net Neutrality restricts the power of the People (who own and control the wires). Says you. :-P Going back and forth on definitions is interesting debate, but I'm still not willing to say Net Neutrality is about government regulation of the Internet I'm still saying No, its about Government protection of the Internet. This seems weasely. Why not admit that it is regulation for the Good Cause of Protecting the Internet from Evil?That then gets back to my original point Which can be said with the saying...The road to hell is payed with good intentions. Or also said with what I believe is a (non-obvious or non-intuitive) equivalent saying...The ends don't justify the means.I know people have good intentions (in wanting governments to regulate the Internet to prevent a Tiered Internet). But, a belief in freedom should guarantee it for everyone, and not just ourselves. (Regardless of whether we agree with them or like what they are doing.) My dilemma is that I believe forcibly taking away someone else's freedom is morally wrong. (You may or may not agree. However, at the moment, for this argument, it's not relevant. What is relevant is that I believe it.) I believe this to be part of morality. As I was growing up, one thing I noticed with some people who claimed they had morals was that they only seem to have it some of the time. They only had them when things were NOT difficult. They only had them when they were NOT tested. They only had them when things were NOT tough. But when it really came down to it, and when things got difficult, when they got tested, when things got tough, they ended up doing the things they said they'd never do. (To me, that meant they had no morals.) To me, it most important to have morals especially with things a difficult; especially when we are tested; and especially when times are tough.To me, this is one of those tough and difficult times.I do NOT want to see a Tiered Internet. However, I must keep my morals. And given I believe that forcibly taking away someone else's freedom is morally wrong. Then I must also believe that regulating the Internet (even to prevent a Tiered Internet) is morally wrong too. I can not do otherwise and still be a moral person.I know this is not what people want to hear. I know that this results in a scary situation. And I know it doesn't seem fair. (But who said life was fair?!) To me, other methods must be used to prevent a Tiered Internet. I was hoping to get a discussion going on what other things we could do. (But it doesn't look like this conversation is going in that direction.) See ya Another interesting debate on definition would be The People ... I guess I'm not willing consider huge corporate conglomerates as The People ... and therefore refuse to consider Net Neutrality as a regulation of The People. The standard distinction is drawn between public and private entities. You're using nonstandard terminology. What's wrong with the typical language?-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: You can't save Internet Freedom by taking it away [was: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Lobbyists Trying to Destroy Internet Freedom?]
Hello David,On 5/19/06, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/19/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do NOT want to see a Tiered Internet. However, I must keep my morals. And given I believe that forcibly taking away someone else's freedom is morally wrong. Then I must also believe that regulating the Internet (even to prevent a Tiered Internet) is morally wrong too. I would argue that you are leaving out a key point forcibly taking away someones rights is a VERY different thing from from making a law that prevents that someone from infringing on an others rights. Notice that I said freedom and not rights.I believe that forcibly taking away someone else's freedom is morally wrong.This -- the difference between freedom and rights -- is a very important distinction. (And I think that most people don't really realize how important it is.) Freedom is something you either have or something that someone has taken away from you. (Also, as a side note, you have liberty when you have freedom.)Rights are something granted to you. Now, a right could try to embody a freedom. (And this has caused some people to use the word right and freedom as if they were synonyms -- as if they meant the same thing. When, in fact, they have completely different meanings.) But often rights do NOT embody a freedom.(For example, patent law [which was created to promote the sciences and useful arts] grants people rights to a state enforced monopoly. But patent law does NOT embody a freedom. In fact, it takes away freedom. The people who created patent law had good intentions . They wanted to promote the sciences and useful arts. However, the enforcement of patent law still forcibly takes away people's freedom.)(As I mentioned somewhere else in this conversation) I find it better to rewrite sentences that use the word rights in terms of the word freedom. It makes things much much clearer. So,... if you'll indulge me... think about what is being suggested to be done to the (people at the) Telco and Cable cartels. And think about it in terms of freedom instead of rights. Are they having their freedom taken away? (Forget about if you like or hate these Telco and Cable cartels. Forget about if you like or hate how they are trying to make a Tiered Internet. And forget about the rights the government grants you, and just consider freedom. Are they having their freedom taken away?)I think they are. (You of course will need to decide this for yourself.)Now consider this. Is it morally wrong to forcibly take away someone else's freedom?I believe it is. (You of course will need to decide this for yourself.)(If you don't believe this, then fair enough,... but then we should probably have another discussion because believing that forcibly taking away someone else's freedom is NOT morally wrong means that you MUST also believe that slavery is NOT morally wrong.) If you do in fact believe that forcibly taking away someone else's freedom is morally wrong, and you believe that the (people at the) Telco and Cable cartels are having their freedom forcibly taken away, then you must also believe that this is morally wrong (regardless of whether you like them or what they are doing). See yaIs it wrong to make a law that prevents discrimination against a group of people just because that law would remove the right to have a discriminatory school or business? Short answer... Yes, I believe such laws are wrong.Long answer... it is actually the enforcement of that law that could potentially be a wrongful act. Basically, it depends on what is or isn't done. Did someone have their freedom forcibly taken away from them. If so, then something morally wrong was done.But, I do understand that there were good intentions in creating laws like these. However, other methods should have been used. (I probably sound like a broken record but) The road to hell is payed with good intentions. And, The ends do NOT justify the means. See yaMaking a law that takes away the right to act in a way that violates someone elses right ... isn't an immoral regulation. And I'd argue its not taking away a right at all ... its protecting one. -- http://www.DavidMeade.comfeed:http://www.DavidMeade.com/feed -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
Re: You can't save Internet Freedom by taking it away [was: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Lobbyists Trying to Destroy Internet Freedom?]
or something that someone has taken away from you. (Also, as a side note, you have liberty when you have freedom.)Rights are something granted to you. (NOTE: I'm not trying to define freedom or right here. I'm only trying to communicate important properties for each that are relevant for this discussion.)Now, a right could try to embody a freedom. (And this has caused some people to use the word right and freedom as if they were synonyms -- as if they meant the same thing. When, in fact, they have completely different meanings.) But often rights do NOT embody a freedom.(For example, patent law [which was created to promote the sciences and useful arts] grants people rights to a state enforced monopoly. But patent law does NOT embody a freedom. In fact, it takes away freedom. The people who created patent law had good intentions . They wanted to promote the sciences and useful arts. However, the enforcement of patent law still forcibly takes away people's freedom.)So,... getting back to what you said.You mentioned: the freedom to be heard. (I think what you really meant was the right to be heard. But assuming you didn't) So, Please give me an example where something is being done to YOU. Is someone from these communication cartels taping your mouth shut (when you don't want them to) to prevent you from speaking? Are they forcibly doing something else to YOU? If not, they have NOT forcibly taken away your freedom. Others can stop you from being heard without doing anything morally wrong. It may suck. But that doesn't make it morally wrong.This should be a wake up call us. (Not a rally to regulate) We should NOT have it so cartels control the Internet. We should make it so this can NOT happen. (Or at the very least, make it so it is very very difficult to happen.) Perhaps the Internet should be like the roads.Alternatively, Where are these fire optic wires that make up the backbones for the Internet. Are they under people's homes? Is there some specific law that gives them the legal right to do this. Let's get rid of that law. (The telcos and cable companies will completely loose their business in this case.) You also mentioned: the freedom to be informed. (Same thing as what I said for the freedom to be heard. Sorry for being lazy and not arguing it out; it's late Friday, and I'm getting tired :-) ) You also said: aren't there any more rights worth fighting for that protect the freedom of real live breathing people. Like I said, I'm concerned about freedom. (Rights are a completely different concept. Rights have nothing to do with morality... although sometimes people try to embody moral concepts with rights... but more often they don't.) Also (as I already mentioned) I never said corporations should have freedom. Corporations are NOT people. (Regardless of whether people call them artificial people or legal people or whatever... they are still NOT people.) Now, the people at these corporations (and cartels) should have freedom too (even if some of them are shitheads). You also said: or does freedom only apply to property and profit these days. The answer is NO, freedom applies everywhere. And that is my dilemma. I am applying it everywhere. And because of that, whether I like it or NOT, regulating the Internet is morally wrong because it forcibly takes away people's freedom. See yaron On May 19, 2006, at 6:16 PM, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote: Hello,On 5/19/06, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Meade wrote: On 5/19/06, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nevertheless, it looks like Charles K. wins this round. The Bill of Rights restricts government power; Net Neutrality restricts the power of the People (who own and control the wires). Says you. :-P Going back and forth on definitions is interesting debate, but I'm still not willing to say Net Neutrality is about government regulation of the Internet I'm still saying No, its about Government protection of the Internet. This seems weasely. Why not admit that it is regulation for the Good Cause of Protecting the Internet from Evil? That then gets back to my original point Which can be said with the saying...The road to hell is payed with good intentions. Or also said with what I believe is a (non-obvious or non-intuitive) equivalent saying... The ends don't justify the means.I know people have good intentions (in wanting governments to regulate the Internet to prevent a Tiered Internet). But, a belief in freedom should guarantee it for everyone, and not just ourselves. (Regardless of whether we agree with them or like what they are doing.) My dilemma is that I believe forcibly taking away someone else's freedom is morally wrong. (You may or may not agree. However, at the moment, for this argument, it's not relevant. What is relevant is that I believe it.) I believe this to be part of morality. As I was growing up, one thing I noticed with some people who claimed they had morals
Re: You can't save Internet Freedom by taking it away [was: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Lobbyists Trying to Destroy Internet Freedom?]
Hello,I think we've gotten as far as we are going to with this argument :-)However, regarding the part about... believing that forcibly taking away someone else's freedom is NOT morally wrong means that you MUST also believe that slavery is NOT morally wrong. Just to point out one thing,... because I think you misunderstood what I was trying to say. I do NOT think you believe that slavery is OK. I think that it may be the case that what you believe is inconsistent. (I.e., you believe something that logically makes slavery OK, but don't realize it.) In other words, you have a contradiction in your beliefs.For example, I would be inconsistent (and I would have a contradiction) if I believed that the consumption of ANY narcotic was morally wrong, but I thought consuming alcohol was OK. The legality of the narcotic is irrelevant. (I've heard this inconsistency from people alot.)If you want to take this off-list I'll lay out the argument for you. (At this point, it's probably becoming way too off-topic for the VideoBlogging mailing list.)But essentially, the argument is just logical deduction. If you're familiar with formal mathematical proofs or things like axiomatic logic, then this will probably be pretty familiar. Also, it's not a horrible thing to be inconsistent. (The only horrible thing is actually realizing you have one and not doing anything about it to resolve it. Of course, it's actually YOU that has to realize it. And not just have someone tell you you have one.) I find myself in that situation from time to time. (Often after long heated arguments with others.) And although finding that I've been inconsistent in my beliefs is unsettling. Once I find that I've been inconsistent, I strive to find a way to resolve this. (And my beliefs must change.) See yaOn 5/19/06, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/19/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (If you don't believe this, then fair enough,... but then we should probably have another discussion because believing that forcibly taking away someone else's freedom is NOT morally wrong means that you MUST also believe that slavery is NOT morally wrong.) And if you're not with us you're against us. Its not that black or white, and presenting an issue with all sorts of grey and saying if you don't believe one polar extreme here then your must also believe another is not only unfair ... it's the sort of scary irresponsible logic that's leads to dark dark chapters in human history. Forcibly taking someone freedom is GENERALLY bad, yes. Certainly there are no shortage of examples where forcibly taking someones freedom is about as bad and evil as something can get. But that doesn't mean its a black or white issue. Convicting and locking someone up who cant seem to stop himself from killing and raping ... I'm ok with that. Did we take away his freedom by putting him jail? Yes. Was it morally wrong? Not to my mind. Clearly there are examples of times when limiting freedom is an acceptable action within a society that believes in laws and government. Removing a freedom to harm someone ... or removing a freedom to actively deny someones constitutionally granted rights ... that's something that most people have accepted within a society that believes in laws and government. Now you can make an argument for anarchy and wild-west style justice ... but lets save that for another thread. Do I think its morally wrong to make a law that prevents corporations from actively denying The People from the very rights that legal system is supposed to grant us ... no I do not. And that does NOT mean I favor slavery. (and here I was the one being accused of making outrageous arguments). -- http://www.DavidMeade.comfeed: http://www.DavidMeade.com/feed -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: You can't save Internet Freedom by taking it away [was: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Lobbyists Trying to Destroy Internet Freedom?]
Hello,I heard that some senator from Alaska -- Senator Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) -- snunk in the wretched broadcast flag into one of the Net Neutrality bills. http://ipaction.org/blog/2006/05/breaking-news-broadcast-flag-is-back.htmlBut I believe that version of it (thankfully) got struck down. But I'm not completely sure about that. See the following for more info on the broadcast flag: http://www.eff.org/broadcastflag/See yaOn 5/18/06, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and when is this vote happening...all i hear is soon congress is votingOn 5/18/06, Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay - where can we get our eyes on the proposed legislation in question? Jan -- It isn't done alone. Pay more. http://fauxpress.blogspot.com - movementhttp://dagnyhemingway.blogspot.com - machinimahttp://vlogpresskit.blogspot.com - mediahttp://blog.urbanartadventures.com - literaturehttp://the-hold.blogspot.com - art http://homepage.mac.com/janmclaughlin/loveletter/iMovieTheater26.html - filmmaker - Original Message - From: Markus Sandy To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 11:51 AM Subject: Re: You can't save Internet Freedom by taking it away [was: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Lobbyists Trying to Destroy Internet Freedom?] Please speak for yourself Ron. I've been studying this issue and lurking on this thread for a while now and it seems to me that there is no single correct point of view here. I'm amazed at the number of misconceptions put forth.For me, this is just one set of big corps against another and consumers are in the middle. I imagine that the governments will just complicate things up as usual. Personally, I don't trust Google, Microsoft, etc. any more or less than I don't trust ATT, Comcast, etc. Both sides present views slanted in their favor. Both dis-inform and mis-inform. Again, speaking for me, I see little difference in either SaveTheInternet and HandsOffTheInternet. MarkusRon Watson wrote: All of us on this list know the reality: power hungry communications cartel seeks to control the internet through controlling the flow of information. -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: You can't save Internet Freedom by taking it away [was: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Lobbyists Trying to Destroy Internet Freedom?]
Hello,On 5/18/06, Richard (Show) Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As you can tell by my signature, I don't have an opinion on this issue ... I agree in saving the Internet too. I just disagree on how to do it.See ya Here's my feeling about government regulation the bill of rights, the patriot act, and the COPE (network neutrality) legislation. The bill of rights is a good thing, the patriot act is a bad thing, the COPE legislation is a good thing, whatever they are called.I'm not real excited about the current US administration, but I don't think of government as inherently bad. I'm very much in favor of government programs that support what I believe to be good/true. I'm not ashamed of that.I have a pretty staunchly conservative friend who said that his belief was that the only role of the government is to provide defense for the nation. My feeling is that ...if that's the government's only job, then how is there any guarantee that what they are defending is worth defending? ... RichardOn 5/18/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Enric,I've been thinking about the whole Tiered Internet thing alot. (Yeah, I know people are calling it Net Neutrality now.) And even talked about it with friends and colleagues.And I think there are 2 things that I want #1: I do NOT want websites to have to pay ISPs for access to us.#2: I do NOT want any government to regulate the Internet.-- Richard http://www.richardshow.comSave the Internet - Preserve Network Neutrality!http://www.savetheinternet.com -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Copyright radical
Hello Devlon,I understand where you are coming from. But I think the argument being made is that the concept of Copyright law is (morally) wrong (regardless of whether it is legal).(I tried to elaborate on what Mark Hosler said in a long post I made in this thread.) See yaOn 5/14/06, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, maybe I am naive or just too new to all this, but I don't see a problem at all. If someone wants to protect their work, they use a license. We have optionsall rights reserved (not granular enough imho) and CC. I feel the great thing about CC is the granularity. I can choose what rights I'd like to reserve.If someone doesn't agree with NC, or ND, then don't use it on their work...simple, done.I can't think of a better way to phrase this, so please forgive the bluntness of it, but it seems like those who oppose the noderivs portion of CC feel that anything released online should be open to them to play with. If it's online, it's mine? On 5/13/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello,Please post the URL to it when it's done.See yaOn 5/13/06, WWWhatsup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yeah I'm just doing up a piece by Eben Moglen wherehe mentions that he and Stallman believe that the NC provision somewaht defeats the purpose.. It's a big encode I'll hopefullyhave it up on Monday.jolyCharles wrote:Hello Chuck,You may want to check this out also...Creative Commons -NC Licenses Consider Harmful http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2005/9/11/16331/0655 http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2005/9/11/16331/0655 See ya- WWWhatsup NYC http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com--- -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service . -- ~Devlonhttp://loadedpun.com | http://mefeedia.comhttp://8bitme.blogspot.com | http://devlonduthie.com -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Copyright radical
Hello Devlon,On 5/15/06, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/15/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Devlon,I understand where you are coming from. But I think the argument being made is that the concept of Copyright law is (morally) wrong (regardless of whether it is legal). I'll have to educate myself more on this topic to avoid putting my foot in my mouth, but I would guess that it was corporations that created the copyright need in the first place...out of desire to protect thier pocketbooks, to hordeand in a perfect world we wouldn't need to be fearful of someone else gaining from our work. Read this for a brief history of Copyright:http://slaw.ca/2006/04/25/publishers-and-copyright/ See yaBut these days I can see some sort of protection people may want to protect the integrity of what ever message they are trying to convey with the contect they create. The no-derivs cc thing gives people that ability. They know that how ever they put their words, images, sounds together will be kept intactand therefore so will their message. (just my barely thought-out thoughts on the subject) (I tried to elaborate on what Mark Hosler said in a long post I made in this thread.) See yaOn 5/14/06, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, maybe I am naive or just too new to all this, but I don't see a problem at all. If someone wants to protect their work, they use a license. We have optionsall rights reserved (not granular enough imho) and CC. I feel the great thing about CC is the granularity. I can choose what rights I'd like to reserve.If someone doesn't agree with NC, or ND, then don't use it on their work...simple, done.I can't think of a better way to phrase this, so please forgive the bluntness of it, but it seems like those who oppose the noderivs portion of CC feel that anything released online should be open to them to play with. If it's online, it's mine? On 5/13/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello,Please post the URL to it when it's done.See yaOn 5/13/06, WWWhatsup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yeah I'm just doing up a piece by Eben Moglen wherehe mentions that he and Stallman believe that the NC provision somewaht defeats the purpose.. It's a big encode I'll hopefullyhave it up on Monday.jolyCharles wrote:Hello Chuck,You may want to check this out also...Creative Commons -NC Licenses Consider Harmful http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2005/9/11/16331/0655 http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2005/9/11/16331/0655 See ya- WWWhatsup NYC http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com--- -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service . -- ~Devlonhttp://loadedpun.com | http://mefeedia.comhttp://8bitme.blogspot.com | http://devlonduthie.com -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service . -- ~Devlonhttp://loadedpun.com | http://mefeedia.com http://8bitme.blogspot.com | http://devlonduthie.com -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radical
Hello Will,On 5/15/06, wtrainbow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Charles,I'm not sure what your point is.You can certainly make the argument that copyright law ismorally wrong, I don't agree it is, but even if you and others believe it is so what.Are you advocating violating copyright law as some sort of protest? Sorry for the confusion.First... No, I am not telling people to violate copyright law.I'm advocating Copyleft. I am suggesting that people use things like the Creative Commons Share-A-Like license(s). And the GNU GPL license. Copyleft in a way let's you opt-out of copyright law. In a way it makes things as if there was no copyright law. The fact is that there are plenty of laws that people would consider morally wrong yet wedecide to follow them because we live in a civil society. If you don't agree with them workto change them.I think current copyright law has a lot of problems but I'm not convinced that the concept of copyright law is morally wrong...it's an interesting philosophical question but I don'tsee it having much practical for videoblogging unless the laws radically change.I guess I didn't make what I was trying to say very clear. I was agruing that Copyright law was morally wrong. And suggesting that those who agree with that use Copyleft licenses for their works.See ya See yaWill--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hello Devlon, I understand where you are coming from.But I think the argument being made is that the concept of Copyright law is (morally) wrong (regardless of whether it is legal). (I tried to elaborate on what Mark Hosler said in a long post I made in this thread.) See ya On 5/14/06, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, maybe I am naive or just too new to all this, but I don't see a problem at all.If someone wants to protect their work, they use a license.We have optionsall rights reserved (not granular enough imho) and CC. I feel the great thing about CC is the granularity.I can choose what rights I'd like to reserve. If someone doesn't agree with NC, or ND, then don't use it on their work...simple, done. I can't think of a better way to phrase this, so please forgive the bluntness of it, but it seems like those who oppose the noderivs portion of CC feel that anything released online should be open to them to play with. If it's online, it's mine? On 5/13/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Please post the URL to it when it's done. See ya On 5/13/06, WWWhatsup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yeah I'm just doing up a piece by Eben Moglen where he mentions that he and Stallman believe that the NC provisionsomewaht defeats the purpose.. It's a big encode I'll hopefullyhave it up on Monday. joly Charles wrote:Hello Chuck,You may want to check this out also... Creative Commons -NC Licenses Consider Harmfulhttp://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2005/9/11/16331/0655 http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2005/9/11/16331/0655[...] -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.comdeveloper weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Copyright radical
Hello,Please post the URL to it when it's done.See yaOn 5/13/06, WWWhatsup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yeah I'm just doing up a piece by Eben Moglen wherehe mentions that he and Stallman believe that the NC provision somewaht defeats the purpose.. It's a big encode I'll hopefullyhave it up on Monday.jolyCharles wrote:Hello Chuck,You may want to check this out also...Creative Commons -NC Licenses Consider Harmful http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2005/9/11/16331/0655http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2005/9/11/16331/0655 See ya- WWWhatsup NYChttp://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.comdeveloper weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Copyright radical
Hello Chuck,You may want to check this out also...Creative Commons -NC Licenses Consider Harmfulhttp://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2005/9/11/16331/0655 See yaOn 5/13/06, Chuck Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Check out this just-posted interview with Negativland's Mark Hosler: http://tinyurl.com/fkfrdHe says You don't get total control when you put a creative workout into the world. If you want total control, keep it in your bedroom.I tend to agree. That's not to say you shouldn't get paid for your creative work. But if you put something out into the publicconsciousness, you've already surrendered how that work willbe perceived, contextualized, and interpreted. Or evenmentally remixed, you might say. Our lives are mashups. The whole fucking world is a mashup.For this reason I'm increasingly against the No Derivatives clauseof Creative Commons licenses. Let me give you an example. Iwas recently depressed about staying up all night doing web production for my job. A piece of art by Hugh Macleod *almost*represented how I felt. It was a purple scribble that said Wecan't go on like this. I made it red and changed it to sayI can't go on like this and posted it on my blog: http://tinyurl.com/l6mx9While Hugh kindly says I can do whatever I want with his art forpersonal use, his CC license says No derivatives. Those conflict. That license says I can look at his work, and remix it in my head,and create a personalized version of it, but I can't show anybody.I can't recreate or regurgitate my experience of Hugh's art -according to that CC license. Well, I say I can and I do. This is particularly true in the digital age. Hugh is not losing anything(especially monetarily) by my personal remix of his art. You cansay the same of using commercial music and images in yourvideos. If you're not trying to redistribute or profit from another's copyrighted work, why NOT include it in your creative palette?The world around us is our creative palette. We have the rightto express the world around us, as artists and human beings.(END RANT) -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Copyright radical
. (Refer to the USA Constitution and the following URL for proof of this: http://slaw.ca/2006/04/25/publishers-and-copyright/ )#3: History has shown that people were able to make a living without Copyright law. COPYLEFTFor those interested, there's a concept called Copyleft that, in a way, makes it as if Copyright law does NOT exist. Essentially, given that most of us live in countries where copyleft law is enforced against us, Copyleft has the effect of letting people choose to opt-out of copyright law. Copyleft does this by essentially uses Copyright law against itself. For examples of Copyleft The Creative Commons' ShareALike concept is Copyleft. And the GNU GPL license is Copyleft. (The GNU GPL license is what most of that Free and Open Source software out there is licensed under.) For more info on Copyleft see:http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyleft See yaOn 5/13/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Chuck,You may want to check this out also... Creative Commons -NC Licenses Consider Harmfulhttp://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2005/9/11/16331/0655 See yaOn 5/13/06, Chuck Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Check out this just-posted interview with Negativland's Mark Hosler: http://tinyurl.com/fkfrdHe says You don't get total control when you put a creative workout into the world. If you want total control, keep it in your bedroom.I tend to agree. That's not to say you shouldn't get paid for your creative work. But if you put something out into the publicconsciousness, you've already surrendered how that work willbe perceived, contextualized, and interpreted. Or evenmentally remixed, you might say. Our lives are mashups. The whole fucking world is a mashup.For this reason I'm increasingly against the No Derivatives clauseof Creative Commons licenses. Let me give you an example. I was recently depressed about staying up all night doing web production for my job. A piece of art by Hugh Macleod *almost*represented how I felt. It was a purple scribble that said Wecan't go on like this. I made it red and changed it to sayI can't go on like this and posted it on my blog: http://tinyurl.com/l6mx9While Hugh kindly says I can do whatever I want with his art forpersonal use, his CC license says No derivatives. Those conflict. That license says I can look at his work, and remix it in my head,and create a personalized version of it, but I can't show anybody.I can't recreate or regurgitate my experience of Hugh's art -according to that CC license. Well, I say I can and I do. This is particularly true in the digital age. Hugh is not losing anything(especially monetarily) by my personal remix of his art. You cansay the same of using commercial music and images in yourvideos. If you're not trying to redistribute or profit from another's copyrighted work, why NOT include it in your creative palette?The world around us is our creative palette. We have the rightto express the world around us, as artists and human beings.(END RANT) -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: PC People (warning: relevant product plug) � Not exactly vlogging but�
Hello Matt,(I might have misread what you wrote, but)While I agree with your assessment that Microsoft Windows is one big security risk, and that using it means that one should block all incoming ports just to be a bit safer... I do NOT agree that this should be done in general. One of the things I've hatted the most, about today's ISP's, is that they do NOT allow you to become true node on the Internet. Being a true node on the Internet implies you can be both client and server. Which means that you need to allow incoming ports. My 2cents :-)See yaOn 5/12/06, LeanBackVids.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My only point is that most Internet users should be disallowingincoming traffic on all ports.As soon as you open port 80 (http) on a machine, it creates a point of entry for a hacker.The problem is compounded by opening ports on a personal machine,which most likely contains sensative data.On a side note... If you are a Windows user, I highly recommend these two free applications to improve your security...AdAware (removes spyware)http://www.lavasoft.de/software/adaware/AVG (anti-virus... DONT PAY FOR NORTON) http://free.grisoft.com/And of course, use Firefox and consider switching to a Mac. :)-Matt---http://vlogmap.org http://ridertech.comhttp://leanbackvids.com--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com , cooper3acd [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hey Matt, Thanks I will let you know. Also, I think you'd be surprised at the depth and security within the technology. We had 2+ years in the p2p photo sharing space before making the move to video and with over 100,000 downloads have never had a reported security issue. Cheers, Rob --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, LeanBackVids.com leanbackvids@ wrote: From my experience, running a web server on Windows is a huge security risk...Especially if it is the same machine you use for personal computing.The average user has no idea about Internet security and anytime you open a network port open the risk of being hacked. Windows is not like UNIX (Mac/Linux).A security flaw in an Windows app can easily allow root access to the whole operating system. UNIX on the other hand has a very robust permissions system that provides a much higher level of security.That being said, I would never recommend a user run a web server off their personal machine. Please let me know when you have a version that can be run on remote server.Not to diss your product, but in my opinion the risk is far greater than the benefit. -Matt--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, cooper3acd robertecooper@ wrote: Hey all, the company I work at has just released a new version of our software for creating/broadcasting video web sites right from your desktop. Just for PCs at the moment but we have a working Mac prototype and will hopefully have something for external distribution soon. Anyhow, it's not exactly vlogging software but it makes it very, very easy for users to create and host a video web site right from their own computer. It takes care of the optimization, transcoding, etc and turns your PC into a server of your video, photo and audio/podcast content. We are currently distributing for free. We're going to be adding some hosted support in the future so it won't require an always- on connection. BTW, up-pipe limitations and firewall issues are handled quite nicely with some smart caching/proxying on the network end. If you're interested, check it out at www.pixpo.com. I'd love to hear any feedback. Like I mentioned, it's not exactly vlogging software at this point, but it may morph more in that direction as the product matures (more room for text, comments + better organization). In the meantime, have a look at my personal page (being served from my laptop here at work): http://liveweb.pixpo.com/robc-work/index.htm Definitely check out the Loading Ready Run channel. It's done by some local college guys who have been doing a video a week for a year now: http://liveweb.pixpo.com/loadingreadyrun/index.html Hopefully this isn't overly commercial (hey we're giving it away at the moment). I've been on the list for almost a year now and I'm thinking this meets a standard of relevance that it's ok that I post about it (once!). Cheers, Rob -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging"
Re: [videoblogging] What is Your Definition of TV
Hello Michael,On 5/12/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just want to dredge out what you think of first when you think of TV (excluding the bube tube you watch video on of course ;-)thnX-- Sull http://vlogdir.com http://SpreadTheMedia.org My definition of Television is this... Television is a telecommunication system for distributing and viewing moving pictures and sound over a distance. (From: http://maketelevision.com/log/what_is_a_vlog_what_is_a_vodcast ) See ya-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.comdeveloper weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Vlog with html links?
Hello,On 5/11/06, awarner20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've listened to some podcasts that have pictures and html links inthem. Does anyone know if it's possible to put an html link into an MP4file?Not sure about MP4's,... but you can do linking with SMIL. See ya-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: QuickTime Replacement and 3ivx MP4 decoding
Hello Brad,VLC's H.264 codec... which goes by the name x264... has won awards! (So it's no surprise that you've had that experience.)Here's some awards that it got...Doom9's 2005 codec shoot-out -- http://www.doom9.org/index.html?/codecs-final-105-1.htmSecond annual MSU MPEG-4 AVC/ H.264 codecs comparison -- http://www.compression.ru/video/codec_comparison/mpeg-4_avc_h264_2005_en.htmlMSU Subjective Comparison of Modern Video Codecs -- http://www.compression.ru/video/codec_comparison/subjective_codecs_comparison_en.htmlAnd for those that want it,... you can Get VLC from... http://GetVLC.com/ See yaOn 5/9/06, Brad Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see my H.264 compressed .mov file produced in MPEG Streamclip looks farbetter in the newest VLC than when running under the 3ivx decoder inother media players.In VLC, the sky apears as a smooth gradient,while in other players, the 3ivx decoding shows aliasing, flickering horizontal ribbons, very distracting.I wiped Apple off my P4 XP machine for QT replacement, so I'm not ableto compare for myself, but I've read other users prefered VLC QToutput over Apple's own media player, and I expect it's VLC's smoothing.I thought I'd loaded a much less compressed version of theclip by mistake, VLC looks that good in this instance.It's great tohave 3ivx for .MP4and .mov playback under other media players, but for the heavilly compressed H.264 files I'll vlog with, I'll recommendviewers download VLC.The alternative is to use less compression--not good!I won't be recommending Apple's nagware to my vlog visitors, or QT replacement, or 3ivx.I'll recommend VLC player, to better reflect myartistic H.264 .mov visions-- with smooth skies that don't flutter andvibrate.b. -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.comdeveloper weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Fwd: [vlc] [release] VLC media player 0.8.5
Hello Enric,I'm pretty sure it needs to be in a separate file.I doubt VLC looks for embedded XML namespaces within a webpage (to find xspf). (Although, someone could always volunteer to add this to VLC :-) ) See yaOn 5/8/06, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can xspf be included in an HTML page or does it need to be in aseparate file?If so, is there an example of xspf mixed with HTML syntax?Thanks, Enric--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The long wait is over.Spiffy! This is a big deal :) And of course, many thanks to Lucas for creating and working on xspf. On 5/8/06, Lucas Gonze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Note XSPF support, meaning that a lot more can be done with video playlists. SPONSORED LINKS Fireant http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=msk=Fireantw1=Fireantw2=Individualw3=Usew4=Explainsc=4s=52.sig=9OOEc0FndaSrZhcGP9B0FA Individual http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=msk=Individualw1=Fireantw2=Individualw3=Usew4=Explainsc=4s=52.sig=95kPiyX0utggsk9QwKxV-w Use http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=msk=Usew1=Fireantw2=Individualw3=Usew4=Explainsc=4s=52.sig=mOj_Rib6MbsFKGpPQ8b4Vg Explains http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=msk=Explainsw1=Fireantw2=Individualw3=Usew4=Explainsc=4s=52.sig=2nX88YAu-OvryCSd54cZHQ -- YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS -Visit your groupvideoblogginghttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging on the web. -To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/. -- -- Sull http://vlogdir.com http://SpreadTheMedia.org -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.comdeveloper weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Fwd: [vlc] [release] VLC media player 0.8.5
Hello Lucas,That's excellent!I was thinking we'd have to wait for SMIL support (for video playlist support)... but XSPF is a much quicker route. (And probably easier for more people to understand.) See yaOn 5/8/06, Lucas Gonze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Note XSPF support, meaning that a lot more can be done with video playlists.See ya-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Fwd: [vlc] [release] VLC media player 0.8.5
Hello Pete,On 5/8/06, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Lucas Gonze [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Note XSPF support, meaning that a lot more can be done with video playlists.Finally, my XSPF playlist can be put to use! If someone can test itout and let me know if it works, that would be great: http://tinkernet.org/xspf/ It doesn't work for me.See ya-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: feed questions
Hello,On 5/8/06, WWWhatsup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Reading that.. one can use, saylink media=tvrel=bananatype=application/rss+xmlhref="" href="http://example.com/feed"> http://example.com/feedtitle=Example/and media can bescreenIntended for non-paged computer screens.ttyIntended for media using a fixed-pitch character grid, such as teletypes, terminals, or portable devices with limited display capabilities. tvIntended for television-type devices (low resolution, color, limited scrollability).projectionIntended for projectors.handheldIntended for handheld devices (small screen, monochrome, bitmapped graphics, limited bandwidth). printIntended for paged, opaque material and for documents viewed on screen in print preview mode.brailleIntended for braille tactile feedback devices.auralIntended for speech synthesizers. allSuitable for all devices.and rel can, it seems, be anything one wants it to be.Yeah. Although you should make your rel something that makes sense.If this is on the homeage of your blog or vlog, then use rel=alternate. If you are on a post of your blog or vlog, then use rel=home. I know that some people and software are using rel=alternate everywhere. I think wordpress, typepad, and some other blogging software WRONGLY does this.I used rel=banana just to push the point :-) (That there's more than just rel=alternate out there... and you should use what's appropriate... and not wrongly put rel=alternate everywhere.) Can one use multiple link statements to differentiate between,say, text and video feeds? Yes.In fact, that's one of the really important use cases for the link element. Which of the above would one use for text? screen?Yes, screen would be for your text feed.Although, if you don't put a media attribute, then it automatically defaults to screen. (So you don't have to add media=screen) So... most the feed link's out there are media=screen by default (even though they don't use the media attribute). Presumably one could use the title attribute to specify further details? The title is meant to be human readable. (And machines, like your web brower, should completely ignore it.)You can add machines readable to the media attribute, the type attribute, the rel or rev attribute, and the class attribute. (Remember, the class attribute is NOT just for CSS styling,... it's for semantics too.)See ya jolycharles wrote:Hello Marc,Also remember to set up your website with Internet TV Feed Auto-Discovery: http://maketelevision.com/log/rss_and_atom_feed_auto-discovery_for_internet_tvhttp://maketelevision.com/log/rss_and_atom_feed_auto-discovery_for_internet_tv See ya-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Vloggercon promo (combined age=129 years)
That car alarm going off in the video (at first) kept on making me think my car alarm was going off. At first, I kept on pausing the video to try and hear if it was my car or not :-) (Guess I've got some pretty good speakers on my laptop.) On 5/8/06, Halcyon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not sure if he'll make the trip, but me and grandpa made a littlevloggercon promo. :)http://hugnation.com/video/Vloggercon_hugPromosmall.wmv -Halcyonvideo.hugnation.com-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Fwd: [vlc] [release] VLC media player 0.8.5
Hello Pete,On 5/8/06, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote: Hello Pete, On 5/8/06, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Lucas Gonze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Note XSPF support, meaning that a lot more can be done with video playlists. Finally, my XSPF playlist can be put to use! If someone can test it out and let me know if it works, that would be great: http://tinkernet.org/xspf/ It doesn't work for me.Can you try again? The URLs I use do issue a 302 Found header and thensend the Location for the actual video. Hopefully this isn't tripping anything up, as that's basic HTTP. (I *did* however fix a typo in thefirst URL.)Still doesn't work for me.See ya -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.comdeveloper weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Fwd: [vlc] [release] VLC media player 0.8.5
Hello Pete,I'll forward this to the VLC mailing list. (Please keep that XSPF online.)See yaOn 5/8/06, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote: Hello Pete, On 5/8/06, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Lucas Gonze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Note XSPF support, meaning that a lot more can be done with video playlists. Finally, my XSPF playlist can be put to use! If someone can test it out and let me know if it works, that would be great:http://tinkernet.org/xspf/ It doesn't work for me.Ah, two things. I deleted a comment in my XSPF file. It was a legit XML comment, so it should have been fine, and I actually downloaded my XSPFfile and saved it locally, instead of trying to open it over thenetwork. That made things sort of work better.I'm still getting some VLC errors, but I'm actually watching video from a playlist, so we're making progress!Pete-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] xspf
Hello,On 5/8/06, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: WWWhatsup wrote: hmmm, looking at your file, pete, it seems the actual media links come in the form: http://tinkernet.org/enclosure.cgi/http://www.archive.org/download/Tjaw_1/20060505tjaw.mov which just loads in your page, rather than the media. If wondered you edited out the cgi bit, maybe it would work? but then I had a go:http://punkcast.com/punkcast.xspf and the VLC just hangs, same as you..I had a typo in the first URL which I just fixed. All the URLs should be valid now.So are there any XSPF playlists with video that work with VLC?It might be working on other platforms. (VLC runs all over the place: Linux, Windows, Mac, etc etc.)I've forwarded the bugs to the VLC mailing list. (Maybe we'll get a VLC 0.8.6 real quick to fix this :-) ) See ya-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.comdeveloper weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: feed questions
Hello Marc,Also remember to set up your website with Internet TV Feed Auto-Discovery: http://maketelevision.com/log/rss_and_atom_feed_auto-discovery_for_internet_tvSee yaOn 5/6/06, mlesser3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Charles,Thanks so much for your informative response. I had been away for a few days without internet access, so I apologize for the delay in thethanks. I'm just beginning to get a handle on the world of feeds..iguess I'll give ATOM a try for my .mov and .wmv feeds...Pray for me. -marc--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles Iliya Krempeaux[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Marc, On 5/4/06, mlesser3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi, I just launched a vlog at www.thejokeproject.com. first off i'dlove to hear what you all think, but I also have a question about feeds. I've created qt and windows media files, as well as mp4's for ipod compatable versions. I've successfully set up a feed for itunes with the mp4 file enclosures. But now I am wondering if I also have to set up 2 other (completely separate) feeds (1 for theqt's and 1 for the windows files)? Your help is greatly appreciated. Thanks, Certainly, one way you could handle this is to create a seperate RSSfeed for each type of video you have.(I.e., one RSS feed for your QuickTime videos.Another for your WMV videos.And yet another for your MP4 videos.) Alternatively, you could create a single Atom feed, which would contain enclosure links for all your video files.(Not sure if iTunessupports Atom yet, so you may have to keep a seperate feed for iTunes even with this.) Or, use RSS with the Media RSS extension, andcreate a single Media RSS feed which would contain enclosures for all your video files.(Again, like with Atom, I don't think iTunes supports the Media RSS extension, so you may have to keep a seperate feed for iTunes even with this.) Personally, I prefer using Atom.(But the choice is yours.) See ya[...] -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Fwd: [vlc] [release] VLC media player 0.8.5
Hello,A new version of VLC is out.-- Forwarded message --From: Antoine Cellerier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: May 6, 2006 12:56 PMSubject: [vlc] [release] VLC media player 0.8.5To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]Dear VideoLAN users,The VideoLAN team is happy to announce the release of VLC media player0.8.5.Highlights of the new features and improvements: * MacIntel support * Statistic system * Linux DV input * Audio CD improvements (CDDB) * Many new and improved video filters * New AJAX HTTP interface * Drag'n Drop and VLM in windows/linux default interface * Winamp 2 skins support * Cook real audio codec * MSN and Growl Now playing plugins * XSPF playlist support * Mozilla plugin support on Mac OS X (PowerPC only) * New default skin * Loads of bugfixes. You can get a complete list by reading the release notes:http://developers.videolan.org/vlc/NEWSBinary packages for Windows and MacOS X (PowerPC and Intel) are available. You can download those and the source code as well on:http://www.videolan.org/vlc/Help concerning this new VLC version is available : * Documentation - http://www.videolan.org/doc/ * The Forum - http://forum.videolan.org/ * The Wiki Pages - http://wiki.videolan.org/ * The User Mailing Lists - http://www.videolan.org/support/lists.html * IRC - #videolan on FreenodeRemember to reset your preferences if you experience problems after upgrading from a previous version.For the VideoLAN team,--Antoine Cellerierdionoea-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Questions: RSS, PSP, 3g, IP ...
Hello,On 5/7/06, wazman_au [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a bunch of questions and thought I'd bundle them together, asthey all centre around customising my RSS feed depending on theviewer's requirements.I'm using WordPress, but not the latest version 'cos I've made lots of tweaks and for the moment I'm happy with it.1) Is it possible to have WordPress decide dynamically to send out adifferent version of the feed, according to what client the user has,eg iTunes, Ant? That depends on how much PHP knowledge you have. If you've you've got enough, you could just (re)write the feed component of Wordpress and get it to do whatever you want. Stattraq tells me what client people use, but I don'tknow how this data is collected or how to use it.Probably from the User-Agent HTTP header the client sends to the server. I imagine the abovecould be done by some sort of PHP script that would process the above info, then call and spit out the corresponding feed. Sadly I knownothing of PHP.Hmmm... then the answer is probably no. As an example, I might want to send out a .mov file for anyone who'susing iTunes or QuickTime, and a straight MPEG-4 file for all others.Or I might like to tailor the content of a video depending on thecountry of the viewer - is it possible to use their IP address to do this?Yes, you can tell what country a person comes from based on their IP address. (Well, most of the time anyways. Sometime many many people from different countries share the same gateway, which has one or a handlful of IP addresses.) Here's what I use alot: http://ip2nation.com/It's completely Free! And is formated for MySQL.(Of course, you got to do some PHP coding, or some other kind of coding to make use of it.) 2) Are there any good directories out there for users of the PSP whoare looking for podcasts, or free video content? I've found a bit of info about 'PSPcasting' but it seems pretty fragmented at the moment.video podcasting and PSPcasting are really the same thing. (It goes by many other names too!)However,... the thing to note is that iPod can only play M4V files; and PSP's can only play MP4 files. So,... basically you have to check each site to see what the publisher is producing. (Some produce only one of these. Some produce both. And some produce neither.)Just as a side note, you may want to consider producing Ogg Theora in addition to whatever else you are producing... http://maketelevision.com/log/why_ogg_theora_matters_for_internet_tv 3) What about directories for 3g content (i.e. playable on 3g mobilephones)? Has anyone experimented with providing 3g versions? Did youget much of a response? How/where did you distribute?To be honest, I'm not really sure what formats are commonly supported on phones right now. I believe there is a container format which (confusingly) goes by the name 3GPP. (Just for comparison, other container formats include Ogg, QuickTime, and Mastroska.)However, the more important question is what goes inside this 3GPP container format. I.e., what codec is being use? (That I don't know.)To be honest, I don't like the whole 3GPP thing. It's basically a replacement to the Internet where you have to pay for each and everything you do. You want to send a text message -- the equivalent of an e-mail -- you have to pay. You want to make a call, you have to pay. You want to watch a video, you have to pay. And don't even think about setting up the 3GPP equivalent of a website... or you'll really have to pay. Honestly, I want wireless phones that hook onto the Internet (and NOT the cellular, GSM, or 3GPP networks).See ya-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.comdeveloper weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Stuck
Hello,Get VLChttp://getvlc.com/See yaOn 5/7/06, Mary Beth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:GrrrI forgot that the reason I walked away from putting videos up for a while was because I've got some frustrating issues.But I was so excited to put together a Vloggercon Promo that I crashedhead first into the impenitrable wall of error messages.Ok, here's the issue: The files that come off my camera are mov.I'm on a PC using Windows Movie Maker because Avid doesn't work forsome reason (retried it again today just for kicks, still not working).I've tried multiple free converters (I've lost count) and none of them worked properly.PS Thanks to Verdi who suggested one a while back (it has been themost successful of all the failures), I tried it but when I try toplay the converted video all I get is sound, it says that I don't have the right codec (H263)So, where can I get this H263 codec?I've looked all over for it andI see lots of pages describing it but nowhere where I can get it.ButI wouldn't even know what to do with it once I got it. Can someone help me?-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Us vs. the UN
Hello,It's already been done. (Although it's not ubiquitous yet.)This page has a link to a bunch of them...http://freenetworks.org/ Someday these we'll hopefully become one network of networks.See yaOn 5/7/06, wazman_au [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:This is interesting. I've thought about this ... effectively daisy- chaining WiFi to create an alternative internet. We all download andrun little applications that make our WiFi cards seek out and link tothe nearest WiFi networks running the same little applications ...with gateways to the original net where needed to bridge the gap. I have no idea how it could be done and I'm sure it would be asecurity nightmare!Wazwww.crashtestkitchen.com--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you know the other day when thinking about net neutrality and savetheinternet.com and what not ... I started thinking .. what would we do if they messed up theinternet this badly?I started to envision a global darknet with city-widewireless mesh networks and radio links between cities ... bypassing the backbone all together ... (The Short Wave Radio Operator in me really gotexcited about that) ... Maybe we should really start drafting up plans. :-P Yeah, but we'd never videoblog again.Things like that will neverget bandwidth that'll be worth anything. -- Rhett. -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.comdeveloper weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Us vs. the UN
Hello,I can't find where I read this (or else I'd credit the author), but when trying to talk to these kind of people, e-mails don't work. They're too easily delete.(Snail) mail works better. But what's best is to call them. When calling them, be polite but be firm about your concerns. Get the names of everyone you talk to and record it and the date when you talked to them. Once you've expressed your concerns, ask the person for an answer. If the can't give you an answer, then ask to talk to someone who can. If no one can give you an answer, then ask them to call you back when they have an answer. See yaOn 5/3/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I heartfully agree, Josh.Unfortunately, this is no longer on anational level, so it may be more difficult to have our voices heard.I have, however, found the site with the contact details of allDelegations/Missions to the organization at the following link: http://www.wipo.int/members/en/Click on the name of your country, then click on 'Contact Information'and then scroll down to find the e-mail address of your country's representation on this matter.As a convenience, I have included the e-mail addresses of Canada andthe US so we can all send e-mails to voice our opinions on the matter:United States: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Canada: [EMAIL PROTECTED]If you do send e-mails... remember to say that you disapprove of theinclusion of Webcasting and DRM in the Broadcast Treaty (currently under debate in the UN's World Intellectual Property Organization) asit does not adhere to freedom of speech.Casey out.--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com , Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: my bad, wrong thread... but we would still be able to send emails ibelieve either way... On 5/3/06, Anne Walk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi andreas. that's not exactly true. it is a problem we will all deal with. not just the u.s. we are already fighting similar ideas sneaking into our country (canada). and companies have long ago stopped being associated with any onecountry.On 5/3/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 03 May 2006 20:38:25 +0200, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yikes, even if this crappy idea goes through it is not likethey areclosing the internet... we would still be able to email eachother...even if itwould feature tons of ads and crap like that. Just to point out the obvious: This is US legislation, only people in the US (or internet traffic going through the US) would be affected.It's not the end of the internet, just the end of a usable internet inside the US. :o) -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Links -- Anne Walk http://loadedpun.com SPONSORED LINKS Fireant http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=msk=Fireantw1=Fireantw2=Individualw3=Typepadw4=Usec=4s=51.sig=Ryjl9rqm5crbA4uMFnSWBA Individual http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=msk=Individualw1=Fireantw2=Individualw3=Typepadw4=Usec=4s=51.sig=7cJ6YQMtmnFeNyQe45Xi2g Typepad http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=msk=Typepadw1=Fireantw2=Individualw3=Typepadw4=Usec=4s=51.sig=L0y7GL5JKRD1TFSowZHzsQ Use http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=msk=Usew1=Fireantw2=Individualw3=Typepadw4=Usec=4s=51.sig=H9CoeMhWBEWGIKc5NEctMg -- YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your groupvideoblogginghttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms ofServicehttp://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ . -- -- Josh Leo www.JoshLeo.com -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Save The Internet!
Hello,On 5/3/06, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wonder if it would be valuable to tag all our Save The Internet related videos. It would be interesting to get a feed of videos that support net neutrality. (SaveTheInternet.com might even be interested in linking to such a feed to show movement on the issue among The People) What do you (everyone) think? Is i worth it? If it is ... would we tag them 'netneutrality' or 'savetheinternet' ... or what?? (This may have come up before. I've been a bit busy with work so I haven't been following the mailing list that closely, but)Jeff Pulver is offering $1000 for people doing this: http://www.pulver.com/savethenet/See ya-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] RE :immigrants' rights events on internet TV/Group on eyespot
Hello,On 5/3/06, davidtodd01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David's and those not named David,We have a bunch of great footage from some of the rallies in San Diego.I have created an eyespot group:http://eyespot.com/groups/ImmigrationProtest all of this footage is available for the media rights project.All eyespot videos will be available as downloads (qt,avi etc )in the next couple of days. Perhaps folks could upload and edit oneyespot and then publish to participatory culture, ourmedia etc? David Todd -eyespotWhat's the license on these videos?Are they public domain? One of the Creative Commons licenses? Or something else?See ya -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.comdeveloper weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] feed questions
Hello Marc,On 5/4/06, mlesser3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi,I just launched a vlog at www.thejokeproject.com. first off i'd love to hear what you all think,but I also have a question about feeds.I've created qt and windows media files, as well as mp4's for ipod compatable versions. I've successfully set up a feed for itunes with the mp4 file enclosures. But now I am wondering if Ialso have to set up 2 other (completely separate) feeds (1 for the qt's and 1 for the windowsfiles)? Your help is greatly appreciated. Thanks,Certainly, one way you could handle this is to create a seperate RSS feed for each type of video you have. (I.e., one RSS feed for your QuickTime videos. Another for your WMV videos. And yet another for your MP4 videos.) Alternatively, you could create a single Atom feed, which would contain enclosure links for all your video files. (Not sure if iTunes supports Atom yet, so you may have to keep a seperate feed for iTunes even with this.) Or, use RSS with the Media RSS extension, and create a single Media RSS feed which would contain enclosures for all your video files. (Again, like with Atom, I don't think iTunes supports the Media RSS extension, so you may have to keep a seperate feed for iTunes even with this.) Personally, I prefer using Atom. (But the choice is yours.)See ya-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] A sad tale about the inventor of TV
Hello,Here's a sad story about how RCA screwed over the inventor of TV -- Philo Farnsworth. http://righttocreate.blogspot.com/2006/05/invention-of-television.htmlRemember, vlogs are part of Internet TV... http://maketelevision.com/log/what_is_a_vlog_what_is_a_vodcast... so this is part of our history too.See ya-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Us vs. the UN
Hello David,On 5/3/06, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you know the other day when thinking about net neutrality and savetheinternet.com and what not ...I started thinking .. what would we do if they messed up the internet this badly? I started to envision a global darknet with city-wide wireless mesh networks and radio links between cities ... bypassing the backbone all together ... (The Short Wave Radio Operator in me really got excited about that) ... Maybe we should really start drafting up plans. :-PThere's already grassroots wireless networks out there.Here's one in my area: http://www.bcwireless.net/ There's grassroots networks like this all over the place. Probably one in your area tooGet a router and help build the new network.See ya -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.comdeveloper weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Replay A/V Software
Hello Susan,On 5/2/06, Susan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have any of you heard of Replay A/V before?I noticed it mentioned onChipChick today...http://www.applian.com/replay-av/index.phpHow could we make this software useful? SusanLooks like a PVR and a Broadcater built into one.There's quite a few of these already. Like Freevo, MythTV, etc.See ya -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.comdeveloper weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Vlogging toy
Hello,On 4/28/06, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey all,Came across a new toy and decided to order one to mess around.http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/products/details/US/EN,CRID=2204,CONTENTID=10628 Phil Torrone has a demo, check it here:http://www.makezine.com/blog/archive/2006/04/logitech_quickcam_orbit_mp_1.htmlI'm not going to name names, but I can think of a few vloggers who would have fun with it :)That's pretty cool!I've seen this type of technology in research... but this is the first time I've seen a product with it.See ya -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.comdeveloper weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Interesting USA Today article
Hello,On 4/28/06, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just read this USA Today articleand cosidering some of the dicussion that was generated by the article on Josh, I found it interesting. To be honest, I'd rather not have anything or anyone take away my or anyone else's freedom of speech.Doesn't matter what you say or what you talk about, and no matter how distasteful it is to others. (Freedom of speech means anything can be said at any time.) Things like slander, liable, and trade secret law just produce a chilling effect and allow others to take away your freedom of speech. You either have freedom or you don't. (And I'd rather have it.)(There are some other laws that take away one's freedom of speech, but I've found that whenever me or others point these out, people tend to have a very emotional reaction and it turns into a flame war. So I won't bother here.) Oh,... and I really like that quote from AristotleWe are what we repeatedly do. - Aristotle(It's too bad those Yahoo! News articles disapear after a while, or I'd bookmark that.) See ya-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___Make Television http://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Interesting USA Today article
Hello,On 4/28/06, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/28/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And that is why reality television is not reality at all.I interviewed a couple of people from a Canadian reality programme (which I will not name in order not to expose them) but I found out that the parts that I was most captivated by where the parts the producer orchestrated to make it more interesting.Yeah-- reality TV is by its nature as orchestrated as anything else, it's just that the producers don't actually hand you a line-for-linescript in advance.Maybe it should be called Improv-TV instead. (Like Improv-Comdey)See ya -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.comdeveloper weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] PDFcasting
Hello,On 4/28/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: just interesting. that's all ;-)http://blog.forret.com/2006/04/pdf-podcasts-proof-of-concept/#more-298 I can't believe I'm using these buzzwords, but...Would this be... Web 2.0 faxing?!(I feel dirty now just having said that.) See ya-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.comdeveloper weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Interesting USA Today article
Hello,On 4/28/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:56:38 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To be honest, I'd rather not have anything or anyone take away my or anyone else's freedom of speech. Doesn't matter what you say or what you talk about, and no matter how distasteful it is to others.(Freedom of speech means anything can be said at any time.)Err... I'm confused. Are you saying that to you, personally, freedom ofspeech should be tht anything can be said at any time? Or are you sayingthat freedom of speech is that anything can be said at any time? I'm saying that freedom of speech is the freedom to say anything you want at any time.Now the law defines it differently. And constantly changes it's definition of it. But I'm not talking about the law... just talking about actual freedom. I think it's important to make the distrintion between legal definitions and definitions. The first we can agree to disagree on, that's a matter of opinion. That's fair.Ibelieve that certain types of speech should be restricted (Misappropriation of name or likeness for example). The latter is justwrong. Freedom of Speech has never included a carte blanche to sayanything.Well, what the USA's government calls freedom of speech never included that. But I think that by the definition of the words freedom and speech in the dictionary, it would include that. (I disagree with the USA government's law and say then that there actually isn't freedom of speech. But,... I'm not trying to get into an argument here.) Libel and slander restrictions has existed well before freedomof speech was ever invented as a concept, and there's a long history ofcertain types of speech being restricted (some worse than others; seditionacts being pretty bad, fighting words making more sense). Hmmm,... I think you are talking about what the USA government defines as freedom of speech. I guess I should mention that I'm not American. I'm Canadian.Also, I don't really think we're arguing over the same thing. I think you're talking about legal definitions... where (I guess you could say) I'm talking about dictionary definitions. I agree that the USA's legal definition of freedom of speech never included any of that. (And that's fine.) But I (personally) want real freedom.See ya -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.casupercanadian @ gmail.comdeveloper weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: can't transcode mpeg videos to iPod compatible .mp4 (was Re: [videoblogging] 15 min turnaround, live-event video-blogged (Treasure Island, Las Vegas)
Hello,On 4/25/06, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mpeg (1) videos are muxed - the audio and video are together in a single track. When you drop them into iMovie you loose the audio. Instead, use Mpeg Streamclip to convert those mpeg clips to DV stream clips. Those will work in iMovie (with sound). Then you can edit and compress from there. Mpeg streamclip: http://www.squared5.com/There site seems to be down. -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.comdeveloper weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/___ Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/ SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
