On 08 Jan 2013, at 15:59, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
Whoever invented the word God invented atheism.
Not necessarily. The modern notion of God comes with the platonist,
and was almost a synonym with truth. There was an implicit, but
reasonable assumption, that humans search
On 08 Jan 2013, at 17:50, Richard Ruquist wrote:
For the record,
Roger's post illuminates an optimal division between the mind:
the EM, and quantum waves and, fields;
and the body: mainly electrons and photons.
We all seem to agree that the mind is arithmetic.
Well, with comp, the mind
Hi Bruno Marchal
I understand your point, which is correct as long as there
is a body in the field.
But consider the quantum wavicle of a photon. It is just a quantum wave before
it hits a photographic plate, at which point it becomes a distinct photon.
The quantum form of the photon before
On 08 Jan 2013, at 18:14, John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
GOD means the reality in which you believe.
Friends, are you tired of your old job, it's time to change your
occupation and make big bucks, amaze your friends, be a hit at
On 08 Jan 2013, at 18:53, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/8/2013 6:56 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 07 Jan 2013, at 19:53, John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Theism, like atheism, is unprovable.
Why is that? You're saying that even though God is omnipotent
On 08 Jan 2013, at 20:42, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/8/2013 10:37 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 07 Jan 2013, at 23:57, meekerdb wrote:
In Bruno's theory both mind and matter are products of
computation. I think it will turn out, as you say, that they are
mutually necessary.
At *our level* I
On 08 Jan 2013, at 21:19, Richard Ruquist wrote:
At the most basic level reality is a discrete digital particle
arithmetic
with no need for further calculations in a block universe.
I don't think so. particles are hgher level first person emergent
phenomenon, from the symmetries brought
Hi Bruno Marchal
There is nothing physical besides the probe before the probe
interacts with the quantum wave field. The quantum wave field
is simply a probability field (with prob 1) all over the universe.
Anything with prob1 doesn't physically exist, because the (r,t) is not
yet
On 08 Jan 2013, at 21:25, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Le me add some meat here
We can not reduce the concept of God to a boring principle that we
need to put somewhere. Like a ugly furniture inherited from the
grand-parents which for its sentimental value we have to keep and
locate
Hi Platonist Guitar Cowboy
Tentative meaning would be more suitable than the word opinion.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/9/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Platonist Guitar Cowboy
Receiver:
On 09 Jan 2013, at 01:01, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/8/2013 12:25 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Le me add some meat here
Nah. It's just your wishful thinking that everybody has to believe
in God.
All correct and self-introspective machine will believe in (some)
God. Keep in mind that
After having discussed the collapse of a
quantum field form of wavicle at a measurement
probe, I wonder if ideas possibly enter consciousness
in an analogous manner. Could they condense out of consciousness
analogous to the collapse of a wavicle at a probe ?.
Thus would be an intuitive idea.
Hi meekerdb
Very good; that is possibly a new version of Idealism.
Also, Sheldrake and many other philosophers (eg Plato)
believe that vision is a two-stage process. First the
light from the object enters into our eyes, then
we project the image back out into the world to
where we see the
Hi meekerdb
Sheldrake's morphisms would be what John Clark or bruno theorized as God.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/9/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: meekerdb
Receiver: everything-list
Hi Richard Ruquist
That could be so. But Wittgenstein and others believed
that the meaning of a word is established through usage.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/9/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
Hi,
let us start with the proposed QS experiment by Tegmark, a QS machine with
a 99/100 chance of a *perfect* kill (so let's put aside HP failure or
whatever so to have either the experimenter is killed with the given
probabilities or it is not, no in between, so in 1/100 he is not killed and
Penrose's concept of consciousness as quantum wave collapse
would seem, at least this morning, to be similar or analogous
to my suggestion that ideas are fixed forms of consciousness created
by some type of collapse of quntum wave collapse such as
photons are formed by the collapse of a
Hi Craig,
Cool. I actually would have agreed with you and a lot of people here at
different times in my life. It's only been lately in the last five years or
so that I have put together this other way of understanding everything. It
gets lost in the debating, because I feel like I have to
Hi Bruno Marchal
You say, Well, with comp, the mind arise from arithmetic.
Wouldn't a Platonist say instead that arithmetic arises from mind ?
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/9/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following
Hi Bruno Marchal
Am I wrong ? I don't think that complexity and Platonism
(top-down being) suit each other. Complexity seems to arise from bottom-up
being as sets of miracles that happen when the Aristotelian
intellect gets stuck.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/9/2013
Forever is
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
let us start with the proposed QS experiment by Tegmark, a QS machine with a
99/100 chance of a *perfect* kill (so let's put aside HP failure or whatever
so to have either the experimenter is killed with the given
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 08 Jan 2013, at 15:59, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
Whoever invented the word God invented atheism.
Not necessarily. The modern notion of God comes with the platonist, and was
almost a synonym with truth.
Bruno,
Another matter is that since the michaelson-morley experiment,
space itself does not exist (is nonphysical). There is no aether.
Electromagnetic waves propagate through nothing at all,
suggesting to me, at least, that they, and their fields, are
nonphysical.
[Roger Clough],
According to Plato, all love, all truth, and all beauty comes from the One
(ie God). That being the case, when I experience love, truth or beauty, I
sense God's presence.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/9/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
--
Where does hate, falsehood and ugliness come from?
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
According to Plato, all love, all truth, and all beauty comes from the One
(ie God). That being the case, when I experience love, truth or beauty, I
sense God's
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:26 AM, socra...@bezeqint.net
socra...@bezeqint.net wrote:
In beginning was Word.
And the Word was written by the formula: T=0K.
soc,
You may be ripe to believe in string consciousness
for its ontological basis is a cubic lattice
of Calabi-Yau compact manifolds
at
Hi chris kramer
Evidence ? God is like the cat burglar and never leaves traces.
Generally, however, since God usually works through people (or angels),
as once in a while in the Bible a stranger appears,
or you might find a stranger (increased taxes) entering your
life (usually to do evil),
Hi Telmo Menezes
In the Christian tradition, Satan.
In the Platonic tradition (which Bruno knows
much better than I do), I think the Demiurge.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/9/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the
On Wednesday, January 9, 2013 6:18:37 AM UTC-5, telmo_menezes wrote:
Hi Craig,
Cool. I actually would have agreed with you and a lot of people here at
different times in my life. It's only been lately in the last five years or
so that I have put together this other way of
On 09 Jan 2013, at 12:07, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi meekerdb
Sheldrake's morphisms would be what John Clark or bruno theorized as
God.
I don't think so. I have never understood what Sheldrake's morphism
are, but they seem physical, from what I can understand.
God is not physical, and by
On 09 Jan 2013, at 12:17, Roger Clough wrote:
Penrose's concept of consciousness as quantum wave collapse
would seem, at least this morning, to be similar or analogous
to my suggestion that ideas are fixed forms of consciousness created
by some type of collapse of quntum wave collapse such as
On 09 Jan 2013, at 12:20, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
You say, Well, with comp, the mind arise from arithmetic.
Wouldn't a Platonist say instead that arithmetic arises from mind ?
Some Platonist have defended idealism, but the problem then is that we
can no more an explanation
On 09 Jan 2013, at 12:27, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
Am I wrong ? I don't think that complexity and Platonism
(top-down being) suit each other. Complexity seems to arise from
bottom-up
being as sets of miracles that happen when the Aristotelian
intellect gets stuck.
Complexity
On 09 Jan 2013, at 12:35, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 08 Jan 2013, at 15:59, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
Whoever invented the word God invented atheism.
Not necessarily. The modern notion of God comes with
On 09 Jan 2013, at 13:04, Roger Clough wrote:
Bruno,
Another matter is that since the michaelson-morley experiment,
space itself does not exist (is nonphysical).
Space-time remains physical, here.
There is no aether.
Electromagnetic waves propagate through nothing at all,
suggesting to
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 09 Jan 2013, at 12:35, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 08 Jan 2013, at 15:59, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
Whoever invented the word God
On 09 Jan 2013, at 13:18, Roger Clough wrote:
According to Plato, all love, all truth, and all beauty comes from
the One
(ie God). That being the case, when I experience love, truth or
beauty, I
sense God's presence.
I can be OK with this, but this will not convince an atheist, who
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 09 Jan 2013, at 13:04, Roger Clough wrote:
Bruno,
Another matter is that since the michaelson-morley experiment,
space itself does not exist (is nonphysical).
Space-time remains physical, here.
There is no
On 09 Jan 2013, at 13:26, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Where does hate, falsehood and ugliness come from?
I am not quite sure, but it comes probably from the consistency of
inconsistency (that is: Gödel's second incompleteness theorem).
Actually it comes from the fact that Bf (inconsistency)
On 09 Jan 2013, at 14:29, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
In the Christian tradition, Satan.
In the Platonic tradition (which Bruno knows
much better than I do), I think the Demiurge.
Platonists are not so good on the bad, and the bad is really a complex
problem. I suggest an
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 09 Jan 2013, at 13:26, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Where does hate, falsehood and ugliness come from?
I am not quite sure, but it comes probably from the consistency of
inconsistency (that is: Gödel's second incompleteness
Dear Bruno,
you know we agree (mostly), you wrote lately that you are more agnostic
than myself - what I doubt since your religion includes numbers and
math(logic) and mine not.
What I take for granted is our limited capability to learn them all about
the *infinite complexity* of which we
On 09 Jan 2013, at 16:17, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 09 Jan 2013, at 12:35, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 08 Jan 2013, at 15:59, Roger Clough
On 09 Jan 2013, at 17:03, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 09 Jan 2013, at 13:26, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Where does hate, falsehood and ugliness come from?
I am not quite sure, but it comes probably from the consistency of
Dear John,
On 09 Jan 2013, at 17:30, John Mikes wrote:
you know we agree (mostly), you wrote lately that you are more
agnostic than myself - what I doubt since your religion includes
numbers and math(logic) and mine not.
My religion (I prefer to say: my favorite working hypothesis) is
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 09 Jan 2013, at 16:17, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 09 Jan 2013, at 12:35, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Bruno Marchal
On 09 Jan 2013, at 12:10, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Hi,
let us start with the proposed QS experiment by Tegmark,
I publish this before. It made some physicists rather nervous against
me, so that I find worthy to vindicate it. I propose the comp suicide
and immortality even well before.
OK,
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
I sense God's presence.
That's nice, but how do you know (and more important how do we know) if you
are sensing a omnipotent being who created the universe or if you are
sensing a bad potato that you ate yesterday?
I've
2013/1/9 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
On 09 Jan 2013, at 12:10, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Hi,
let us start with the proposed QS experiment by Tegmark,
I publish this before. It made some physicists rather nervous against me,
so that I find worthy to vindicate it. I propose the comp
On 1/9/2013 2:48 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 09 Jan 2013, at 01:01, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/8/2013 12:25 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Le me add some meat here
Nah. It's just your wishful thinking that everybody has to believe in God.
All correct and self-introspective machine will believe
On 1/9/2013 3:10 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Hi,
let us start with the proposed QS experiment by Tegmark, a QS machine with a 99/100
chance of a *perfect* kill (so let's put aside HP failure or whatever so to have either
the experimenter is killed with the given probabilities or it is not, no
2013/1/9 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 1/9/2013 3:10 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Hi,
let us start with the proposed QS experiment by Tegmark, a QS machine
with a 99/100 chance of a *perfect* kill (so let's put aside HP failure or
whatever so to have either the experimenter is killed with
On 9 January 2013 18:17, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
* David Nyman's heuristic makes me think that they could be zombie, but I
am not sure this can work with comp.*
Don't forget that we are speaking only of a heuristic, or guide for
thought. The idea is to evaluate what consequences
On 1/9/2013 7:05 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 09 Jan 2013, at 12:35, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 08 Jan 2013, at 15:59, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
Whoever invented the word God invented atheism.
Not
On 1/9/2013 7:20 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 09 Jan 2013, at 13:18, Roger Clough wrote:
According to Plato, all love, all truth, and all beauty comes from the One
(ie God). That being the case, when I experience love, truth or beauty, I
sense God's presence.
I can be OK with this, but
On 1/9/2013 11:52 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/1/9 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:meeke...@verizon.net
On 1/9/2013 3:10 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Hi,
let us start with the proposed QS experiment by Tegmark, a QS machine
with a
99/100 chance of a
On 1/9/2013 2:14 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
We start each with 100$ that we use to make the first bet, the column contains the $ we
have in our pocket after the bet depending on the result.
I don't know what Me and Brent mean in this? betting on survival or death?
bet n° Experimenter
Not in the dictionary. try again.
On 09/01/2013, at 11:21 PM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
paroxistic
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To
Agreed, and I hope that truth is true .
Richard
Truth is true !!!
/ Richard /
Very good proof. . .
. . . . and . . ‘. . by Beauty that beautiful things are
beautiful . . .
by largeness that large things are large and larger things larger,
and by smallness that smaller things ate smaller .
Can we say that physical particles are often localised volumes
that are full of infinities of discrete number relations
Sounds to much physicalist for me (or comp).
--
Particles in the vacuum ( T=0K ) have no volumes
( according to the laws of thermodynamics )
therefore we think
2013/1/10 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 1/9/2013 2:14 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
We start each with 100$ that we use to make the first bet, the column
contains the $ we have in our pocket after the bet depending on the result.
I don't know what Me and Brent mean in this? betting on
61 matches
Mail list logo