frustrates me when reading popular physics articles. In
their defense, though, force particles are much smaller than proteins!
At least, Monday is over! Have a good week.
Roger
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group
the resulting reads to known genomes to find out what microbes are
present at that site.
Sorry to write so much. Biochemistry is one area I know a little about
(real little!) as opposed to metaphysics.
I wish tomorrow weren't Monday. Have a good week!
Roger
you!
Roger
On Saturday, April 4, 2015 at 3:08:19 PM UTC-4, cdemorsella wrote:
-Original Message-
From: everyth...@googlegroups.com javascript: [mailto:
everyth...@googlegroups.com javascript:] On Behalf Of Russell Standish
Sent: Thursday
(more detail, philosophical background and stuff on spheres in section
called Use of the proposed solution to build a model of the universe.
Anyways, I think you're on the right track. Thanks!
Roger
On Saturday, March 28, 2015 at 5
...@googlegroups.com javascript:
*Subject:* Re: Why is there something rather than nothing? From quantum
theory to dialectics?
Roger: It's possible that what we see as existing is a simulation in some
other computer. But, even if we are a simulation, the simulation that is
us exists
Roger: It's possible that what we see as existing is a simulation in some
other computer.
And thus in arithmetic, which can be proved to emulate all computers, on
all programs, on all input. This is standard knowledge for logicians, but
not always well known by non-logicians
what I say is derived from the assumption that the brain or the body
is Turing emulable at a level such that if we turing-emulate it, you would
not see the difference subjectively. It is my working assumption.
Roger: It's possible that what we see as existing is a simulation in some
other
Roger: It's possible that what we see as existing is a simulation in some
other computer. But, even if we are a simulation, the simulation that is
us exists as does the computer and the code we're a simulation in. My
thinking is aimed at trying to figure out there are existent
But, what is outside the head is a circle, with a circumference and a
diameter.
This is ambiguous.Are you talkng about the platonic perfect circle? Or
about a circle physically realized, like with a pen and a compass?
Roger: A physically realized circle.
I doubt this exist
Roger: Just because things can exist outside the mind/head doesn't mean
that a specific thing does occur outside the mind/head. If the pi
proposition and the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal point of pi can be shown
outside the mind/head or any experimental evidence for the existence
On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 2:49:12 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 19 Jan 2015, at 23:48, 'Roger' via Everything List wrote:
Roger: Even if no mind has yet conceived the the 10^(10^(10^100))th
decimal point of pi, the pi proposition and therefore the process of
calculating its
Roger: Even if no mind has yet conceived the the 10^(10^(10^100))th
decimal point of pi, the pi proposition and therefore the process of
calculating its 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal point and being confident that
if you do the process that that number is either 0-9 are all located inside
on our
ideas and models. This is what I think many of us are working on either in
our spare time or full-time. Good luck to all of us!
Roger
P.S. One thing that I know exists is that I have to go to work tomorrow
(had today off), and I don't like
touring,
that'd be great! Some younger people, though, have never even heard of
them or other bands from the 60s-80s.
Roger
On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 7:01:38 PM UTC-5, Jason wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 5:02 PM, 'Roger' via Everything List
everyth...@googlegroups.com javascript
beyond the cosmological horizon
and the interiors of black holes but so far only theory about multiple
universes. Anyways, let's keep working at it!
Roger
On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 6:56:38 PM UTC-5, Jason wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 4:48 PM, 'Roger' via Everything List
everyth
Chris,
Mostly I agree with everything you said. Specifically:
By corollary and by symmetry this same optic of doubt can shine upon the
notion of a real physical entity underlying the stuff we call real. What is
real about a proton, electron, photon…etc.?
Roger: I agree. Proton
On Sunday, January 18, 2015 at 2:52:34 AM UTC-5, Jason wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 11:48 PM, 'Roger' via Everything List
everyth...@googlegroups.com javascript: wrote:
On Sunday, January 18, 2015 at 12:27:06 AM UTC-5, Jason wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 11:11 PM, 'Roger' via
Roger,
I have a question for you.
Do you believe the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal digit of Pi has a certain
definite value, which is either 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9?
If so, would you still believe this if you knew that this number is too
difficult to ever compute by anyone
On Sunday, January 18, 2015 at 12:27:06 AM UTC-5, Jason wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 11:11 PM, 'Roger' via Everything List
everyth...@googlegroups.com javascript: wrote:
Roger,
I have a question for you.
Do you believe the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal digit of Pi has a certain
On Saturday, January 17, 2015 at 1:12:20 PM UTC-5, spudb...@aol.com wrote:
The only thing about Larry Krauss that I like is his sketching out a
conjecture for faster than light travel.
Agreed. Krauss kind of irritates me, too. His book title A universe from
nothing: Why there is
, make a hypothesis, and test it to try and get
evidence).
On a different note, I have a hard time navigating through all these
different threads and posts. I wish it were somehow a little easier to
follow. But, it could just be me.
Thanks!
Roger
On Monday
.
That's the key for all of us, IMHO.
Roger
On Monday, January 12, 2015 at 3:52:38 PM UTC-5, John Ross wrote:
Roger and Everyone,
I absolutely agree. And I have been working on a model which explains how
our Universe works including how our Universe of 100 to 400 billion
On Wednesday, January 14, 2015 at 5:28:03 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 14 Jan 2015, at 08:05, 'Roger' via Everything List wrote:
I have to admit I have a hard time going with the idea of Platonism or
mathematical constructs existing somewhere that no one can see or test. I
sure
. The arithmetical platonism (realism) used in
computationalism is the same amount than the one used in computer science,
physics, etc.
Roger: My view is that propositions like 786899543211 is prime or is not
prime, 1+1=2, etc. are mental constructs/entities that exist in our
minds (e.g., in our
, once
we assume Church-Turing thesis), then the physical universe is a first
person plural sort of hallucination, and we must derived the laws of
physics from the laws of thought (Boole and Boolos, say).
Roger: Even if the universe is a hallucination, purely based on thought, or
a computer
Chris and Brent,
On Tuesday, January 13, 2015 at 1:42:43 AM UTC-5, cdemorsella wrote:
Roger: It seems to me, too, that there are problems with zero dimensions,
or point particles. I've never understood why physicists don't question
the idea of a zero-dimensional point
Chris,
Hey Roger ~ sorry for the belatedness of my reply
Roger: No problem. I know there were a lot of other passionate
discussions going on here lately!
-
I really like your idea of imagining your mind growing to infinite size,
but I agree it sounds pretty hard. I'm
.
Roger
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post
.
Roger
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post
and the very small.
Roger: I really like your idea of imagining your mind growing to infinite
size, but I agree it sounds pretty hard. I'm going to give it a try. Your
head doesn't blow up, does it? :-) As you said, maybe people visualizing
the infinitely small and infinitely big will eventually meet
If only through the we which think about that nothing.
Is anything possible at all without an observer?
-Chris
Roger: If we're talking about the situation where there's only the
absolute lack-of-all or the empty set, I think the only place the
perspective/observer is coming from
.
Roger
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything
Chris,
I have nothing important to say! :-) Nothing and something are kind
of good areas for puns, double entendres and jokes. After all, Jerry
Seinfeld had a whole show about nothing!
Roger – you have much to say about nothing [just joking]
You mentioned:
I agree
theory to dialectics?
On 1/2/2015 9:05 PM, 'Roger' via Everything List wrote:
Even if the word exists has no use because everything exists, it seems
important to know why everything exists. How is it that a thing can
exist? What I suggest is that a grouping defining what is contained
question of Why is there something rather than nothing?.
On Thursday, January 1, 2015 12:17:37 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 11:36 PM, 'Roger' via Everything List
everyth...@googlegroups.com javascript: wrote:
propose that a thing exists if it is a grouping
is that this absolute lack-of-all is identical to something. I'm not
sure how trying to explain why a thing exists and why nothing is
actually not the lack of all existent entities but is instead a something
drains exists of any usefulness?
Thanks.
Roger
/whydoesanythingexist
(summary)
sites.google.com/site/ralphthewebsite
(click on 3rd link, more detail)
Roger
On Wednesday, October 22, 2014 4:33:50 AM UTC-4, Peter Sas wrote:
Hi guys,
Here is a blog piece I wrote about nothing as the ultimate source of being:
http://critique-of-pure
Peter,
Hi. I've read parts of a few of your blog posts and found them very
interesting and highly recommend them to others.
To build on this thread of Why is there something rather than
nothing?, I'd like to throw out some related ideas. I used to post here
more often with this, but
Leibniz's theory of perception and consciousness.
The secret of perception. Particular minds and how they relate to the overall
or Cosmic Mind
The problem of perception in materialistic thinking is that it forces us to
think that there is a fleshly homunculus inside our brains.
Leibniz has
How the banks are stealing our wealth.
This seems to be factual, and is non-politcal.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFDe5kUUyT0Hi - Roger Clough
You'll need to watch it at least twice to understand it,
it's very complicated. And scarey.
Pass it on.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000
The bitcoin is an international speculative cyber-currency
(based on nothing) that has been inflating rapidly in price.
I would be wary of investing in it because it can drop in value
just as fast as it is rising. It's probably a bubble.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHVu626uOGE
Dr. Roger B
, they will deliver to your door. Will keep for 25 years.
Usually 99$ but now on sale at $89 each.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active
=Augason%20Farmadid=224211189655wmlspartner=wmtlabswl0=3536268310wl1=ewl2=walmart%20augason%20farmswl3=15081448341veh=sem
Free shipping, they will deliver to your door. Will keep for 25 years.
Usually 99$ but now on sale at $89 each.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See
=Augason%20Farmadid=224211189655wmlspartner=wmtlabswl0=3536268310wl1=ewl2=walmart%20augason%20farmswl3=15081448341veh=sem
Free shipping, they will deliver to your door. Will keep for 25 years.
Usually 99$ but now on sale at $89 each.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See
Walmart 30 Day Emergency Food Storage Pail Augason Farms Review
Video at- Roger Clough
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRtg5YKddQo
$89.00 on sale from $90.00 at walmart.
free shipping, order online at
http://www.walmart.com/search/search-ng.do?search_query=Augason%20Farmadid
Hi Chris,
According to the Vostok
data, we're in for another ice age, in say 10,000 years or so.
jcs-online,theoretical_physics_board,-
mindbr...@yahoogroups.com,everything-list,4dworldx
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu
Hi Hans Dieter Franke
A great place for hackers to start to be an identity imposter
is www.healthcare.gov (if that's the right address).
No or little security.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
---
This email
months to begin with.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
--
You received this message because you
Hi -
Global warming ? Liberals live in a universe of lies.
Arctic sea ice increased by 51 % last year.
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/10/22/51-growth-in-thick-arctic-ice-over-last-year/
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu
MERRY CHRISTMAS !
USAF FLASH MOB
at the National Air and Space Museum, Washington DC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIoSga7tZPglist=UUKX86dJGhTOn8NtRUqnATFQ
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
---
This email is free
there is a perceiver in materialism,
could you tell us where it is ? It has to be at one place,
as your experience and mine says that there
is only one perceiver.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
---
This email is free from
or other bodily sites.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
--
You received this message because you
,
but there is always a loss converting experience to symbols,
expressing in words my expeience, what I thought and concluded,
which need not be in symbols.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
---
This email is free from
. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
and in b) and c) carries out a
prescribed action which biologists might call an instinct
and which Leibniz calls a pre-established harmony.
Dr.Roger B CloughNIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
---
This email is free from viruses
.
This is the province only of philosophy.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
--
You received this message because
by the first person singular.
This is the province only of philosophy.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
the Many. But
others have suggested that the One is just one, not
unity in diversity.
Leibniz, through his metaphysics, in which the parts
are related to the whole, suggests that metaphysics,
even aesthetics, rules the universe, not mathematics.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my
For those wishing to delve deeper into Leibniz, see A modern monadology
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/jonathan-edwards/monadology
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast
For those interested in the theory of conscious experience, see
the excellent site,
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/jonathan-edwards
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because
).
Because only Idealism contains Mind. Materialism and science do not and can not.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http
connections to the brain.
10. The mind plays the brain like a violin.
11. Life is Mind.
The list goes on.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
perceived attributes
such as shape or temperature as well as mood. The changes
are not actually caused by interactions between monads
(since being independent, there can be no relations between
monads) but are caused by the One in its search for a more
perfect harmony or unity.
Dr. Roger B
operate on its own laws without a lot of direct interference?
ROGER- According to my understanding of Leibniz and the Bible, after God had
created the
universe in six days, he wrote a computer program called the pre-established
harmony
on the seventh to run the universe forever onward
nature of contingent knowledge as an example.
I have not checked Russell's treatment of Kant, but
because of this ignorance, Russell also apparently
treats Kant as an empiricist gpone bad.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
being or mental.
The da is in spacetime and the sein is outside of spacetime,
so a dasein is a monad.
Thus Heidegger's universe is essentially the same as Leibniz's,
an infinite collection of monads or daseins.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http
on the person, which limits the range of
inter-communion with other saints and the environment.
Salvation is not clearly defined in Leibniz, as far asI have been able to find
out, but certainly communion of the
Self and the One is found pleasurable and enlightening.
Dr. Roger B Clough
.
For example, essence is what causes a struck ball to follow Newton's law of
motion.
For example, tje mind controls the brain.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because
(a corporeal body) is inside of spacetime and follows
particle physics and relativity.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http
How can a grown man be an atheist ?
An atheist is a person who believes that the universe can
function without some form of government.
How silly.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
---
This email is free from viruses
How can a grown man be an atheist ?
An atheist is a person who believes that the universe can
function without some form of government.
How silly.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
---
This email is free from viruses
of consciousnwess
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
gh
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
objects and
assigning a subject (a monad) to each object.
This everything is conscious to some extent.
Otherwise it could not follow the pre-established harmony.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
---
This email is free
.
There is however no provision in materialism
or analytic philoophy for such a self.
Therefore materialism cannot explain consciousness.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
---
This email is free from viruses and malware
philosophy has
struggled but failed to explain consciousness.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
--
You
in the universe, but only from its own perspective, and monads being monads,
not perfectly clear but distorted.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
An account of the historical (and continuing) suppression of Leibniz's
forbidden ideas
Leibniz was an anti-materialist so that his inclusion of Mind and
deity into his philosophy were forbidden ideas, and stillo are, to our
detriment.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTiztUNrhhM
Dr. Roger B
.
Or meaningful issues such as ethics or aesthetics.
However, continental philosophy and Indian philosophy can.
(Leibniz, Kant, Indian philosophers).
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
Dr. Roger B
-- the basis of materialism and atheism--
which are cults that have have degenerated Western thought -
have passed on or are at an advanced age.
Bertram Russell - Died 1970
Donald Davidson - Died 2003
Hilary Putname -- alive but at age 87 - Roger Clough
Willard V.O. Quine -- died 2000
Richard Rorty
, namely, the world of experience,
that of the First Person singular. So it is nonlinear and wholistic.
This is hopefuly the new paradigm of the mind and brain
which needs further developing by others.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu
. It is Russell's knoeledge
by acquaintance, namely, the world of experience, that of perception,
comnsciousness, ? that of the First Person singular. It nonlinear and
wholistic.
This is submitted to all as the new paradigm of the mind and brain
which needs further developing by others.
Dr. Roger B
Hi Gabriel Bodeen
Absolutely.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
- Receiving the following content -
From: Gabriel Bodeen
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-11-26, 15:17:20
Subject: Re: Why
or be conscious (first person
singular.)
So only humans and other living entities can be conscious or be truly
intelligent.
Thus artificial intelligence is impossible
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
--
You received
The difference between computer and human perception
Computer consciousness and perception is by description only, such as 42.
Underwater perfection as given below.
Human perception is an experience such as shown in the photograph.
42. UNDERWATER PERFECTION
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1
Note that only Idealism such as in Leibniz or Plato or Kant can deal with human
perception,
because only such Idealism can deal with knowledge by acquaintance (experience)
directly,
not by description..
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http
What I find curious is that so much time and vitriol is spent on the web
attacking theism,
while so much money is spent on ai and computers to simulate humans, when
nobody has ever shown or proven that computers can be conscious.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site
Atheism is wish fulfillment.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
Athism is wish fulfillment.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
Atheism is wish fulfillment.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
, Kant).
Definition of ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY
: a philosophical movement that seeks the solution of philosophical problems
in the analysis
of propositions or sentences ?alled also philosophical analysis compare
ordinary-language philosophy
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my
in the analysis
of propositions or sentences ?alled also philosophical analysis compare
ordinary-language philosophy
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
DreamMail - New experience
Pre-established harmony ? Computers programs exhibit pre-established harmony.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group
plays the brain in thought much like a violin is
played by a violinist.
This also answers Heidegger's life-long search for
an answer to the question what is being?
Being is I am or essence+existence.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http
in thought much like a violin is
played by a violinist.
This also answers Heidegger's life-long search for
an answer to the question what is being?
Being is I am or essence+existence.
Dr.Roger B CloughNIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu
.
This also answers Heidigger's life-long search for
an answer to the question what is being?
Being is I am or essence+existence.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
subjectively)
Example: you know who Obama is because you have met him.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
known that Leibniz referred to the myriad
of microscopic organisms seen in a microscope as
vderying his view of the world as the many in the one
(the monad).
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
--
You received this message
Hi - Roger Clough
All current theories of mind are objective (materialist) since they do not
include the first person singular.
Consciousness or Mind is nonobjective or subjective, since it is the
perceptions by the first person singular.
Only Leibniz has a philosophy of mind (subjectivity
possibility of overall
governance.
See
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
1 - 100 of 2086 matches
Mail list logo
