OM Namo Narayan -
0- The Miracle is when all falls away and simply the Extraordinary
Ordinary of 0 point balance remains. Then One begins to Live -
when the illusion is laid bare then an even Greater Mystery is
Entered. Hahahahahahahahahah
Maha Shanti
Comment:
Also, I realized that I no longer care what people think of my
experience. I'm no longer guarding it. It is what it is. Opinions and
perceptions are barely fazing me. I'm delighting in this liberation.
Go ahead, think me crazy, no problem! If the nut bus is headed to
Realization,
Sat Guru:
0- Inner Guru is that which resonates with Truth, that
the Sat Guru ignites with Living Expression and methdologies
that pull away the layers of untruth, until simply the Reality
rather than a projection remains.
Sage:
Go Guru, Go Guru, get your Groove on, Go Guru!!
Sat Guru:
Om Namo Narayan -
Great Day
This is not a chat list but rather an working
online Ashram. As such there are some rules
and regulations. The following are Musts and
not simply suggestions.
1. Post an introduction as per the instructions
sent via the automatically generated mail.
2. Post
OM Namo Narayan,
Attempted to write something this morning about this one's
background, but fell Silent. Only thing that came to 'mind'
was: insignificantly significant. Once there was a me that
beleived in True Peace, now there remains no *one* that Lives AS
True Peace. This, sweet friends,
The short explanation of this which will be easily understood is
enlightened are not performing Sidhis because there is no one to be
the performer, no desires for such things but they do occur around
the enlightened, it just happens
A performer of sidhis is not enlightened
--- In
Hello,
Comments from my Guru about this book:
This book is called Padamami ( I think). It is also edited by David
Godman, and the acounting was by one that was with Ramana. The
difference in this book compard with other acountings is the real
essence of what the path is there without sugar
I think this book title is Padamali
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Comments from my Guru about this book:
This book is called Padamami ( I think). It is also edited by David
Godman, and the acounting was by one that was with Ramana
Here is the definite spelling- Padamalai
It was first published in 2004
Comments from my Guru about this book:
This book is called Padamami ( I think). It is also edited by
David
Godman, and the acounting was by one that was with Ramana. The
difference in this book compard
Since this thread is one of many where there are some that are happy
to be where they are with TM and then some indicating they would
have nothing to do with TM, my question to the latter is what is it
you have decided to do now?
Have you continued seeking another path that can bring about
This is a profound question Ron. I hope others weigh it.
I think you have given a false choice here,
Response:
It is not my choice- it is for each to choose - I was addressing the
ones that are not happy with TM, for the ones that are, you are all set
For the ones that are not, what' s
Namaste Guruji and all,
Namaste and Beauty FILLED evening,
*Guruji, I wanted to thank you for your responses to my most recent
posts.
S The satsang videos are a wonderful blessing for all.
*Also, I have had two other questions that keep coming up all
the time. I think I have addressed them
When all has fallen away and Dissolved all the distracting
complication which is a hallmark of mind goes as well. What one
*thought* they knew which was a benchmark of ego wisdom (?) blows
away as dust in the wind. hahahahahahahahah Over and done.
Entering into the Unknowing Beyond
My Guru is from the same tradition as TM's Guru Dev.
Ron
WILL APPEAL TO EVERYONE, SO MAY
SOME ENJOY WHAT I JUST WROTE
RON
Your guru ends the message of trying to draw Maharishi down into the
mud with:
I WELCOME YOU ALL WITH GREAT LOVE AND RESPECT.
What a joke...
I forwarded this comment to Swami G and this is the reply:
G when it comes to the antics of Mahesh Yogi, this Guru is not laughing -
when so
Hello,
I am forwarding a reply from Swami G to some of the comments:
G i don't know enough about Byron Katie to comment - so will stay
silent on this.
As far as the other comments are concerned - if they have gotten
something from
TM GREAT, if they remain in balance and not in confusion
Note: I am forwarding a response from Swami G to the last post. There
is a mixture of comments from me and also the poster. Me = T ( short
for Tanmay which is my spirital name given at diksha), *= the poster,
and G = Swami G:
T: Coming from my Guru, it was said there is a tradition where a Guru
I wonder if this Guru would enjoy Byron Katie... :-)
* I doubt it. I've come across Swami G several times in the past few
years, and it's always been in a context of conflict. She has a very
dualistic and fundamentalist mindset about spiritual rights and wrongs
G dualistic and fundamentalist ?
Christ, this whole dialog is a breath of fresh air. Ron, (Tanmay) you
were born for this moment.
lurk
Hello,
Nice to see a nice comment. I have a lot of enthusiasm for what is
taking place. It is my seva, and it is a part of the whole process
that one that is in a path is doing seva
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, boo_lives [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
Loving what *IS* may be different than loving what is -
Yes, what appears
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
Those two things ( for me) are of the utmost importance in order for
significant progress- and emphasized- Sat Guru and one to one. For
those who
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No surprises here, but good to see in print as the lies of Mahesh
unravel once again.
This would be worth adding to the list archives Ron.
Veritas liberat.
Hello,
Well, As was suggested by Swami G , one honors where
will forward Swami G's response so hold off on making any comment
from what I just wrote
Tanmay
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
Hi thanks for the quick response. Still I feel that she
@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
Hi thanks for the quick response. Still I feel that she is tiptoeing
around the points. These points or rather my main point is, that
within the Saraswati Order, as well as two others within the Dasanami
System, only Brahmins can be made Swamis, period
Hello,
I just forwarded 10 posts from this group to Swami G, I did the best I
could to be sensible in leaving out a few posts, also from the new
thread with Swami G in the title.
There are two yahoo groups ( out of around 15) that Swami G monitors
and responds to posts. Some of you may consider
that a response to a sadaka or whoever will be a
waste of time, then the response won't be made.
Tanmay
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
Even a worse situation- I only read one paragraph before I
Hello again,
I just remembered that one of Swami G's books should be in 21st century book
store, or also
at amazon- Kundalini from hell to heaven by Ganga Karmokar
I think I have that right
Tanmay
Hello,
This is the original post and the forwarded response from Swami G:
Hi thanks for the quick response. Still I feel that she is tiptoeing
around the points. These points or rather my main point is, that
within the Saraswati Order, as well as two others within the Dasanami
System,
Hello,
Going through the posts is not like normal letter, I am cutting out
the redundency or what I think is either blatently ignorant or
without sincerity or someone playing around.
There was a post like that in the other thread. I did post a response
which covers all the posts. If there are
Come find the Beauty life has to Offer
Be a Great Existence -
#2
What I was getting from Ron and Swami G's comments was that since
Mahesh could not be initiated as a swami--as Sw. G sees it from her
direct experience being in that living tradition--he would not be able
to be initiated
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, it basically boils down to one guru who isn't qualified to be a
guru lashing out at another guru because he isn't qualified to be a
guru. Indian spiritual politics... gotta love it!
Are we about to step into
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
So, it basically boils down to one guru who isn't qualified to be a
guru lashing out at another guru because he isn't qualified to be a
I have forwarded both the post here and in the other thread to Swami G
and will post a response.
I know there were 4 Gurus along the way in Swami G's path- you can see
some info about Tantra, mantra - how Swami G even defines it in
www.abide-in-self.com
Tanmay
People here tend to judge
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
So, it basically boils down to one guru who isn't qualified
Come find the Beauty life has to Offer
Be a Great Existence -
Namaste GuruJi,
Namaste
My Tantric Master was not from Rishiskesh but another part of india -
what was learned
wasn't what the west terms a left hand path - it was this Sat Guru
that also commissioned
me to go forward as a
Come find the Beauty life has to Offer
Be a Great Existence -
#5
Namaste
mantra diksha is a far cry from becoming a sannyasi -
Yes a transmission occurs around an authorised Guru - and it
is known here having spoken with one of Mahesh Yogis Sadhakas
who WAS in direct proximity
I looked at the picture, and it certainly is Swami G with, as you
righly say a pujari. Please go also to
http://youtube.com/results?search_query=Swami+Gsearch=Search and you
can see that it Swami G is an American woman who has taken sannyas
vows. About the stick I am also puzzled, by I
Come find the Beauty life has to Offer
Be a Great Existence -
Om Namo Narayana
G my training is within both Shivaite and Kali traditions as well as
esoteric christianity - as stated before i am Fully authorised by my
Tantric Guru as a Sat Guru which is beyond the state of an achraya
to
I would have expected Ron's 'swami' guru to rise above the polarity
with something meaningful to at least present some dignity. Guru Dev
[SBS] seems to have united people and done this without any apparent
effort. Instead, Ron's guru appears to be part of the conflict.
Hello,
Lets try
Hello t3rinity,
Can you post that Judy post you are talking about here in this thread?
I think this is called a thread - right?
I am following emails from 15 yahoo groups, so I am only reading the
mails in this thread and really busy. Swami G is not in FFL at all.
Tanmay
Tanmay
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
Hello t3rinity,
Can you post that Judy post you are talking about here in
this thread? I think this is called a thread - right?
I am following
Thus, Swami g's, seeming reliance on swamihood as being THE criteria
for being an effective teacher, seem odd.
TANMAY: I DONT KNOW IF YOU WATCHED THE VIDEOS OF SWAMI G UNDER
GURUSWAMIG IN YOUTUBE BUT IT WOULD EXPLAIN THINGS. SWAMI G DIDN'T SEEK
BEING A GURU, BUT RATHER PREFERED ENJOYING THE
Yesterday you claimed to have given up this list,
TANMAY: REREAD IT, IT SAYS I WILL HANG OUT FOR A WHILE, I SAID I AM
FINISHED SENDING IN SWAMI G;S RESPONSES.
presumably because
too many here posessed enough knowledge to see through your
rethoric... and now you continue !
Don't you see that
to enter this path or do you? Man,
this certainly is a differnt sort of letter- what happened to this guy
called Ron. Even that, you loose your name- he isn;t ever Ron anymore-
Ok, let me try to get serious again, last time I tried in this letter,
I lost it again and went off- just one more reason
Hello again and Namaste,
It 's so nice to see you. OK,I will stop right there, I was about to
start up all over again.
I didn't know about this 35 rule until well into posting- just heard
about it I think 2 days ago. So, it is starting on zero at midnight
tonight? You have a counter running for
PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
I picked my Diksha name out of a bowl and it came out to be
Tanmay
Does Swami G require or prefer that her students/followers/devotees
take and use a Diksha name? Or, would she be cool with folks who just
want
Or, to paraphrase Senator Lloyd Bentsen's reply to Dan Quayle during
the 1988 Vice Presidential debate: You're no Maharishi Mahesh Yogi,
Swami G.:-)
Maharihsi is a world class business man among other things, that is
not an insult regarding his business capabilities- it is phenominal.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
snip
TANMAY: I DONT KNOW IF YOU WATCHED THE VIDEOS OF SWAMI G UNDER
GURUSWAMIG IN YOUTUBE BUT IT WOULD EXPLAIN THINGS. SWAMI G DIDN'T
SEEK BEING A GURU
Maybe for clarity's sake, I will offer an overview of what has taken
place so far. I started posting here about my experiences with
another Guru but my background is coming from TM so similar to many of
you here.
I am claiming that there is clarity all around where I am, and it
therefore evens
Hello group,
The first 2 posts didnt come out right so here goes third attempt:
Post 1:
__Om Namo Narayana - __* My SatGuru is one in physical form, yet I
have had no direct teachings. All have been in astral levels only.__G
any teachings that come solely through astral realms are suspect. __*
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kirsten schreiber
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Namaste Swami- G,
Namaste and OM -
* Thank you for your guidance and support. I have had enough suffering
and do wish
to find that peace. I don't want to be part of the blind leading the
blind and respect that
this is a
exchange. This poor woman, not swami
g, seems to be caught in some real subtle mental traps
and very confused. I wish her the best.
--- Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello group,
The first 2 posts didnt come out right so here goes
third attempt:
Post 1:
__Om Namo Narayana
? If so, what is your take on this ? I just gave mine.
Maybe those reading this can see the Universe offering a wake up call?
Ron
Maryanne Lee-Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maharishi on Vastu
Global Confrence on Architecture, 17.5.07
MAHARISHI: ...I am
I asked G to comment:
Dr peter:
Perhaps MMY is speaking about a condition of mind and
not pure consciousness.
G there is No conditioned mind in Pure Consciousness. If that were the
case then there is simply an intellectual knowledge being paraded as
Pure Consciousness.
Regarding the
@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
I asked G to comment:
Dr peter:
Perhaps MMY is speaking about a condition of mind and
not pure consciousness.
G there is No conditioned mind in Pure Consciousness
Poster:
Ron/Tanmay, are you suggesting that certain things
you post here are approved by your guru and others
are not? And that you actually feel that makes a
difference?
Tanmay:
No and No- I think Judy may have cleared that up- I posted in the TM grroup- I
think it
was a hair negative and I
Not alone. But having practised and studied for a long time, he can
very well distinguish, and so can I. We can compare, as we have lots
of experience to draw from. This my, and the impresion of many here as
well, in conjunction to the many inconsistencies of your Gurus claims
and her general
Michael:
but then for me it does not have to be one-to-one. this is the
difference between us: while this is a way i am going myself, i
acknowledge that for many others it is different. you seem to insist
by asking: 1) is it one-to-one 2) is it a satguru, that this is the
only way, and that makes
Hello
I didnt know you are into Mother Meera. I went there like 8x- all ok. I showed
her books to
Swami G. Swami G said there is nothing being siad there that is not being said
here. That was
from some breif reading.
First time I went, I got stuck in the mud so I called adac (AAA). They
Hello,
I saw Mother Meera around the year 2000 upwards. It was a difficult time for me
then, was
filled with sorrow and things, desperate somewhat. I called MM once- I was
living at
Klauses- she asked what are you doing? ( through her husband or secretary- she
didn't
speak directly on the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
I have read about Swami G long before this exchange here. Someone at
ATM,
*Tanmay: what is ATM? Swami G also has the first name Ganga- occasionally
Still thing you should have listened to Mother Meeras advice and
gotten a normal job.
I have always worked this life but very extended time of for years at a time
has been part
of it. In TM, there are probably plenty of others that have done the same- we
all do what
we got to do. I am just
Note: * = Poster , G = Swami G
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], jimraypghwrote:
* Hello
G Namaste and Great Day -
* I just discovered this site - I suppose timming is
everything. I do have a Kundalini Blockage. It is very painfull -
the invoulintary movements of Kryias - Invounlitary
Hello,
In this youtube video, I asked this guy a question but I knew I was going to
get some wild
response, having just got through with his brother who declares himself to be
the only
Guru in the west, and only his words are atman, others will not last.He deleted
challenges
to what he said
Hello,
Hey, I also want to comment about Mother Meera. A good feeling there, deeply
commited
for those seeking help. She shifts people around in the positions so that the
ego is not
promoted . I saw her secretary in the capacity as a mechant collecting the
money for the
incents, her husband
Namaste and OM
What is the difference between one that goes
until they come to that 'Wall', and are then
able to Surrender, even unto Death?
G either wanting to find out what is beyond here,
more than they fear the fear.
OR just plain being so exhausted that one
can no longer struggle
A friend claims he has a video or tape where MMY is talking about
Kundalini, so I can't confirm this until I hear it, he said he will
dig it out.
Hamsa Yogi on youtube talks about it, I didn't catch everything about
it, and the four Guru's on youtube talk about it.
We all have it, it is shakti
Comment from Swami G picked off a youtube comment to a Guru:
Chidvalasananda was not Realized she is in the midst of the journey -
Muktananda was not authorized to be a Guru. Nityananda left the form
willingly and stated there were None that came that were not seeking
out of personal benefit. Maha
Hello,
Someone sent in Kundalini questions which were answered in 2 seperate
posts by both Swami G and Swami Siddhananda ( next in line). Before
that, my comments on a partial post:
Snip:
Correct the experience of the Self as God merges into the infinite
beyond and the devotee realizes himself
I can only comment on what I have done which it TM and now something else. When
I got
the new thing, hardly any instruction was needed because of my TM background.
It seems
like the technique is so engrained that it can never be flushed out, and
probably one
would not want it to be.
Lately
I think this is from Vaj? Your guru gave you walking meditaiton? That
is one of the things here in my path, referred to as open eye
meditaiton and it can be all the time. If there are thoughts, having
the mantra going along with taking one back to the present if they
notice they are not there,
Post:So, mainly I hear you saying, that it's just a matter of regaining
the innocence of childhood, feeling life from the heart instead of
the head(either one), and maintaining a balanced schedule.
Sounds good to me.
Comment:
There is an instruction which my Guru gives for anyone who wants to
If your child was a spiritualy advanced seeker and said his interest
is to find a path or organization to join for the purpose of gaining
enlightenment, he is going to research what is available on the market
and his question is what advice can you tell me regarding the things I
should be looking
You're talking about sattvic states of mind. The
little me does not become the Big me. That is only a
useful fiction that MMY spoke about. The little me
disappears and there is no me only THAT.
I can't speak from direct experience, can only tell you what my Guru says- and
the above
is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
TM simply provides a more ideal opportunity for
the transcending. As a technique it is second to
none, in my opinion, and I've studied under
numerous teachers. TM sure surpasses in
effectiveness the concentration on the tip of
the nose taught
since the topic is lively, here it is:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tW6pVFOpE6Q
When I took initiation in my new path, the universe is asked May the truth be
entered of the
silence of Self's nature, which is the real essence and power behind all words
and thoughts,
May he bypass all false
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
since the topic is lively, here it is:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tW6pVFOpE6Q
When I took initiation in my new path, the universe is asked May
I am not sure what you mean in this joke but it is a general
knowledge point coming from my path here. As there is a variety
of methodologies and ways of expressing knowledge, the stuff
coming from here will most likely be mirrored with Ramana
Maharishi.
The point is a siddha Guru
I found this interesting when I was visiting, it was right around the time when
this Guy in
California was executed- Tooky Williams or however you spell it.
I was talking with SwamiG in the Ashram, which always means it is Satsang. I
think Satsang
means association with Truth. If that is so,
http://dyc.org/information.php?info_id=19
Come find the Beauty life has to Offer
Be a Great Existence -
Namaste,
Namaste and Great Day -
* Celibacy has no meaning to this one at all as being part of the
path or not - it is a natural falling away and has never been
thought about. It does not make one more holy to be celibate just
as
Namaste Guru-ji,
Hope the trip was was uneventful and you are well. Have not had a
chance to listen to the CD, yet, as the kids have been attached at
the hip today (yesterday's excursion must have thrown them off
course! Ha ha ha ha ha!), so I will listen tonight once all angels
are tucked into
Post: While liberation from earthly, astral and casual bodies / planes is
a function of getting beyond the BINDING influence of ones vast
karma,it does not eliminate that karma. A brahma-vid still has tons of
karma, its just that that karma does not necessitate rebirth on
corresponding planes.
My Guru said in Realization, everything is heard as OM.
The dead Guru's can tell you this in their books, channelers can channel a Guru
that will tell
you this, but a living Guru telling one this reaches beyond the intellect.
will be back on line
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ron, I hope you don't mean this literally!
--- Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My Guru said in Realization, everything is heard as
OM.
The dead Guru's can tell you this in their books
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, suziezuzie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
My Guru said in Realization, everything is heard as OM.
The dead Guru's can tell you this in their books, channelers can
channel a Guru that will tell
ome find the Beauty life has to Offer
Be a Great Existence -
Namaste GuruJI and group,
Namaste and Great Day -
I think I am off to Germany tonight. Here is a post and exchange in
another
group that has a hodgepodge of disciples following different gurus or
do it
yourselfers:
G enjoy your
Thanks for the advice Nabulous.
Yes, that was an answer to my question but it can be elaborated- A
guru doesn't leave the disciples in mysterious quesitoning and confusion
Come find the Beauty life has to Offer
Be a Great Existence -
Namaste Guru-ji,
Namaste and OM
Namaste and Great Day
* I am not posting this directly to the Message Board, as this one is
unsure
if it would be a hinderance or a value to those fresh in the path. So, will
let you make that
The trick is to dispel the illusion, not just by denial of its
existence but by un-entanglement of the jiva/soul with it! Mere denial
is not enough, the residual samskaras (impressions in the mind) are
deeply rooted in the subconscious.
Awareness of the one 'Reality' (God), at those
I was just talking with a friend who has been paying attention to the
celebrations. He said this past Jan 12, Guru dev was not referred to
as Swami, and he said this has been going on for a while.
He then got into speculation why and said something must have happened
with the Swamis.
I asked
Poster Billy:
Sat Gurus don't grow on trees, in this day and age you'd think so! MMY
has never claimed to be a Sat Guru, his honesty is refreshing. Yet, he
still offers an effective technique for Self Realization, although, at
some point a Sat guru may step in and help a *sincere* devotee out,
Snip..
If you're into the Delta Frequencies, consider the work of Bill
Harris at Centerpointe...
He's really into the Delta thingy...
Check it out at: http://www.centerpointe.com/
I looked it over briefly, it said being conscious with delta waves
has been documented. I asked my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This mix up happens several times:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enq=nithyananda+%27swami+g%27btnG=Search
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
Ron/Tanmay, try to get a proper name for 'Swami G'
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/07
Namaste -
having spent some time together when you left the question you asked
just remained... about the saint and the realized Being and so
here is an extended answer.
TS:
I guess the attraction to see a saint or realized
one is because I do not feel I am a saint or realized yet. My
No one has yet stated the obvious, and that is that it
is not necessary to tread the path of kundalini
awakening to become realized. Of course those on such
a path will claim it is.
Tanmay: Well peter, I am using one of my posting allotments dedicated to this
because I
thought I gave the
Hello,
Swami G explains the kundlaini like that, neutral. It is the way it is handled
which brings
about the greatest blessing or worst nightmare, just as electricity can be used
to light a
house or execute someone.
Because Swami G is all over the internet since 1999 and is available to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
No one has yet stated the obvious, and that is that it
is not necessary to tread the path of kundalini
awakening to become realized. Of course those
@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
My post is about a topic one level further up the
logic tree -- why do you assume that someone is a
guru, and *when* you do, why do you assume that
their opinion has any more
101 - 200 of 360 matches
Mail list logo
