--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Geez, does this ever end?
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
vajranatha@ wrote:
snip
I was talking to a psychiatrist friend last night
and asked him
about
: [FairfieldLife] Re: An Inspiring Visit to Baba
Muktananda
On Sep 8, 2007, at 11:27 PM, Peter wrote:
Geez, does this ever end?
For the Axis II TM/TMSP practitioner?
What does Axis II mean?
snip
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axis_II_%28psychology%29
This is too funny. Vaj
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an interesting post. snip
It's about kundulini. What are you supposed to do with it?
You're going to get a flood of responses. Let me say, I was one who
fervently prayed for enlightenment in the early
On Sep 9, 2007, at 1:56 AM, Bronte Baxter wrote:
Of course I know the standard party line Indian admonition, that
the student needs the master to guide him through the kundulini
experience safely. But I no longer buy that we have to give our
power away to gurus to unfold the divinity we
PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: An Inspiring
Visit to Baba
Muktananda
On Sep 8, 2007, at 11:27 PM, Peter wrote:
Geez, does this ever end?
For the Axis II TM/TMSP practitioner?
What does Axis II mean?
snip
See:
http
--- Bronte Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an interesting post. It reminds me of a
question I've had a long time that maybe some people
out there can answer. It's about kundulini. What are
you supposed to do with it?
Sometimes in my life when I've done a lot of
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of Vaj
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 10:43 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: An Inspiring
Visit to Baba
Muktananda
On Sep 8, 2007, at 11:27 PM, Peter wrote:
Geez, does this ever end
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Bronte Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an interesting post. It reminds me of a
question I've had a long time that maybe some people
out there can answer. It's about kundulini. What are
you supposed to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Geez, does this ever end?
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
vajranatha@ wrote:
snip
I was talking to a psychiatrist friend last night
and asked him
about
Boy, I like that, Lurk. Enlightenment means you operate on a quantum level,
not a Newtonian level. That's beautiful.
Bronte
-
Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story.
Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Boy, I like that, Lurk. Enlightenment means you operate on a
quantum level, not a Newtonian level. That's beautiful.
Thanks.
I remember that up until about 25, I was a pretty serious fellow-
still working through
You said it very well. It sounds pretty darn enlightened.
Bronte
lurkernomore20002000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Boy, I like that, Lurk. Enlightenment means you operate on a
quantum level, not a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I was talking to a psychiatrist friend last night and asked him
about diagnoses of people you knew online for a couple of years
and if it would be possible to diagnose someone, roughly, based
on their interactions with
Geez, does this ever end?
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I was talking to a psychiatrist friend last night
and asked him
about diagnoses of people you knew online for a
couple of years
and if it would be
On Sep 8, 2007, at 11:27 PM, Peter wrote:
Geez, does this ever end?
For the Axis II TM/TMSP practitioner?
Likely not. (at least in this incarnation)
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Vaj
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 10:43 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: An Inspiring Visit to Baba Muktananda
On Sep 8, 2007, at 11:27 PM, Peter wrote:
Geez, does
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Vaj
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 10:43 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: An Inspiring Visit to Baba
On Sep 8, 2007, at 11:47 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vaj
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 10:43 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: An Inspiring Visit to Baba Muktananda
On Sep 8, 2007
This is an interesting post. It reminds me of a question I've had a long time
that maybe some people out there can answer. It's about kundulini. What are you
supposed to do with it?
Sometimes in my life when I've done a lot of meditation, back in the days of
TM or later through other
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone mentioned apologize. For what?
You and your comments were merely the excuse
that an unhappy person was waiting for to dump
their unhappiness on someone else, and hope-
fully drag that someone else down to their level.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally just find it appalling that you don't
instinctively know what the problem is, that you
have to have it explained to you.
How can one expect that from a fellow who labels people according to
his mood ? Not
I knew it wouldn't be long...
Barry, you're so *predictable*.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@ wrote:
Someone mentioned apologize. For what?
You and your comments were merely the excuse
Richard should consider going back on his
antipsychotic medication.
Richard J. Williams wrote:
Quack!
Dr Peter Sutphen wrote:
You're crazy.
So, you think you're a psychoanalyst and a doctor
who can advise people to medicate themselves. But,
it looks like you're not licensed to
Peter wrote:
You're crazy.
Judy wrote:
Wouldn't you just *love* to have him as your
therapist? Such integrity...makes you feel all
warm and fuzzy, don't it?
Pete reminds me of that doctor guy I met at the
State Hospital. Years ago I applied for a job there
and I was taken on a tour of
Peter wrote:
Judy, I haven't replied to your post yet because I
read it once and when I returned to it the next day
it was gone because for some reason I only can keep
a certain number of post in my mail box.
Get a Mac you fuckin' idiot!
And stop mixing up your client email with the
Sorry, but I had some additional thoughts:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Your original argument
(Again, it wasn't my original argument.)
was ridiculous when you claimed that I had
violated some sort of confidentiality with Richard and
could only
TurquoiseB wrote:
But now, Peter, asking a professional out of
curiosity, *is* there a psychological term or
profile for someone who obsesses on making other
people apologize to them, or apologize, period?
I don't know if Peter would agree but you named the term when you said
obsesses as
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TurquoiseB wrote:
But now, Peter, asking a professional out of
curiosity, *is* there a psychological term or
profile for someone who obsesses on making other
people apologize to them, or apologize, period?
I
---Yes, definitely bizarre! (I've seen it before).
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
TurquoiseB wrote:
But now, Peter, asking a professional out of
curiosity, *is* there a
Nobody here seriously suggested Peter should
apologize. Because Barry is above reading my
posts, he missed it when I corrected him on
this earlier today--and now *he's* obsessing
about this imaginary demand for an apology
from Peter.
Barry Wright, Master of Inadvertent Irony.
--- In
TurquoiseB wrote:
Obsessive compulsive disorder certainly fits quite
a few people who have posted here...
You've been posting to Usenet for what, thirteen years.
I've been trying to stay off of this newsgroup to
help keep the flame factor down. My intention was
never to disrupt things. But
On Sep 6, 2007, at 3:33 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TurquoiseB wrote:
But now, Peter, asking a professional out of
curiosity, *is* there a psychological term or
profile for someone who obsesses on making other
people
Vaj wrote:
Watch Charlie Brown get lured in and then watch him
get blasted again. And then get lured back in again:
rinse and repeat.
According to my analysis, you have a bad case of ATT.
Get some professional help. Stop coming back here
time and again to get blasted. Get a life.
Vaj wrote:
I was talking to a psychiatrist friend last night and asked him about
diagnoses of people you knew online for a couple of years and if it
would be possible to diagnose someone, roughly, based on their
interactions with others, their responses, etc. He said not only would
you be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 6, 2007, at 3:33 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
TurquoiseB wrote:
But now, Peter, asking a professional out of
curiosity, *is* there a
Dr Peter Sutphen wrote:
Richard should consider going back on his
antipsychotic medication.
Quack!
Shemp Mcgurk wrote:
Judy's right, you're wrong, Peter.
The best course of action for you is to apologise and
tell her and this forum
Apologize to Judy and the forum?
that you were wrong and that you stand
corrected.
Dr Peter Sutphen wrote:
Richard should consider going back on his
--- Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dr Peter Sutphen wrote:
Richard should consider going back on his
antipsychotic medication.
Quack!
Thank you for your healthy response, Richard! It
appears to be given in the same spirit that I told you
to return to your antipsychotic
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dr Peter Sutphen wrote:
Richard should consider going back on his
antipsychotic medication.
Quack!
Thank you for your healthy response, Richard! It
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dr Peter Sutphen wrote:
Richard should consider going back on his
antipsychotic medication.
Quack!
---Somebody mentioned that an insult naming an anatomical part would
be inappropriate. Saythe part that follows from go suck
your.. Of course, this would be the elbow since that would not
only be inappropriate, but impossible for most people.
Instead of medications, I would
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Judy, I haven't replied to your post yet because I
read it once and when I returned to it the next day it
was gone because for some reason I only can keep a
certain number of post in my mail box.
There's always the FFL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Jesus Judy, relax, will you! I was making a crack
regarding Richard. I was not doing so in any
professional capacity. How is this unethical? Nasty?
Yes. He got me
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If it's any consolation to you, once you've done that you can feel
all superior to Judy because apologising and admitting she was wrong
on a point is something she's never done.
I'm not sure but I seem to recall
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Jesus Judy, relax, will you! I was making a crack
regarding Richard. I was not doing so in any
professional capacity. How is this unethical?
Peter, I'll go through it again for you. PLEASE
make an effort to follow what
I have no intention of meeting Curtis at
Union station, now or at any time in the future for
sexual activities)
Thanks for crushing my dream man, crushing my dream.
BTW anytime you need a non-professional to call somebody here nutz,
just tap 3 times on the side of the stall. (Twice if you run
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of authfriend
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 11:36 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: An Inspiring Visit to Baba
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 31, 2007, at 12:54 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
But even if he WERE psychotic, it would STILL be
unethical for Peter to deliver that diagnosis
publically, and ESPECIALLY for the purpose of venting
his
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 31, 2007, at 2:06 PM, authfriend wrote:
Vaj means to say, of course, It's pretty strange for
an editor to claim they're different. He's the one
claiming there's no distinction between them.
Shitfest.
No,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Aug 31, 2007, at 2:06 PM, authfriend wrote:
Vaj means to say, of course, It's pretty strange for
an editor to claim they're different. He's
On Sep 1, 2007, at 2:11 AM, new.morning wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 31, 2007, at 12:54 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
But even if he WERE psychotic, it would STILL be
unethical for Peter to deliver that diagnosis
publically, and ESPECIALLY
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I think most non-professionals would be surprised at the degree of
accuracy of some psychological and psychiatric professionals in
assessing general state of mind and disorders such as personality
disorders just
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
On Aug 31, 2007, at 2:06 PM, authfriend wrote:
Vaj means to say, of course, It's pretty strange for
an editor to claim they're different. He's the one
claiming there's no distinction between them.
No, that's not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't also ignore the fact that TM and TMSP-based kundalini
disorders can help give rise to and/or exacerbate personality
disorders and a wide range of psychological pathology. In this
case,
the more you meditate, the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 1, 2007, at 2:11 AM, new.morning wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
I am not sure i agree. To assert in one breath that one has the right
and sanction to declare one crazy in
You can take the peter out of the doctor, but you can't take the
doctor out of Peter?
I've been watching this thread with some interest. My first reaction
was to defend Peter, so I took a little more time to see if I could
get around my personal bias of friendship. (We are not exactly tapping
Curtis,
Your answer clearly upset Maria.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2007/09/01/sports/02sharapova.1.600.jpg
She just lost at US Open. Reining champion losing in second round. And
its all your fault.
(And no, she is not interested in a consolation date. I just talked to
her, sobbing,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Curtis,
Your answer clearly upset Maria.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2007/09/01/sports/02sharapova.1.60
0.jpg
That, or inflamed hemmoroidal tissue.
lurk
] Re: An Inspiring Visit to Baba Muktananda
But even if he WERE psychotic, it would STILL be
unethical for Peter to deliver that diagnosis
publically, and ESPECIALLY for the purpose of venting
his frustration--because he's a credentialed
professional, and his word therefore carries much
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I don't think that posting on this board is a venue for him to
act as a doctor, posting here makes you a poster on a fairly
outrageous board. I don't even know exactly what his
credentials are.
He's a
Jeez, leave this board for a day and you miss a lot. I
didn't make any sort of diagnosis formal or informal
regarding Richard. I just mentioned that Richard
should consider going back on his antipsychotic
medication. Was this a bit of a nasty comment? Yes, it
was. Should I have said it? I don't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeez, leave this board for a day and you miss a lot. I
didn't make any sort of diagnosis formal or informal
regarding Richard. I just mentioned that Richard
should consider going back on his antipsychotic
medication. Was
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jeez, leave this board for a day and you miss a lot. I
didn't make any sort of diagnosis formal or informal
regarding Richard. I just mentioned that Richard
should consider going back on his antipsychotic
medication.
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jeez, leave this board for a day and you miss a
lot. I
didn't make any sort of diagnosis formal or
informal
regarding Richard. I just mentioned that Richard
should
--- curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You can take the peter out of the doctor, but you
can't take the
doctor out of Peter?
I've been watching this thread with some interest.
My first reaction
was to defend Peter, so I took a little more time to
see if I could
get around my
The below is merely and only my opinion.
I don't believe it, but it's been said that Judy is a True Believer in TM.
So why does she not practice the most basic outside of meditation
commandment that Maharishi STRONGLY underlined and espoused, and, in
fact, in most of his public appearances was
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The below is merely and only my opinion.
I don't believe it, but it's been said that Judy is a True Believer
in TM.
So why does she not practice the most basic outside of meditation
commandment that Maharishi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It may be of greater value for you to look in the mirror with regard
to the same essentisl message you have just used to aim at Judy. [This
is my view and I do consider it to have significant value.]
John Manning, you
What leaders of the tmo say about sweet truth in public and what
they do in their daily life are two completely different things. TMO
leaders specialize in public superficial sweetness while privately
obsessing like secret police on who should or shouldn't be on their
black lists for being off
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The below is merely and only my opinion.
I don't believe it, but it's been said that Judy is a True Believer
in TM.
So why does she not practice the most basic outside of meditation
commandment that Maharishi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, boo_lives [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What leaders of the tmo say about sweet truth in public and what
they do in their daily life are two completely different things.
TMO leaders specialize in public superficial sweetness
Exactly. This nauseates me when I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're here only to attempt to piss EVERYONE off. You're a bucket of
shit that has somehow become conscious enough to use a keyboard.
Interesting point in a thread about projection.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@ wrote:
snip
snip
she seems to assume her view of Peter
is true and that she has some sort of mantle of authority to
make such an assement, but she does
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@
wrote:
Dude, with all respect, you need to be back on your
Seroquel. I kid you not. You have symptoms of a mild
psychosis.
Unethical *in the extreme*
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of nablus108
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 10:04 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: An Inspiring Visit to Baba Muktananda
Please remember that petersutphen is a professional phcycological
authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dude, with all respect, you need to be back on your
Seroquel. I kid you not. You have symptoms of a mild
psychosis.
Unethical *in the extreme* for a mental health
professional to publically
authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@
wrote:
Dude, with all respect, you need to be back on your
Seroquel. I kid you not. You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@
wrote:
Dude, with all respect, you need to be back on your
Seroquel. I kid you not. You have symptoms of a mild
psychosis.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@
wrote:
Dude, with all respect,
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of authfriend
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 11:36 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: An Inspiring Visit to Baba Muktananda
But even if he WERE psychotic, it would STILL be
unethical for Peter
On Aug 31, 2007, at 12:54 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
But even if he WERE psychotic, it would STILL be
unethical for Peter to deliver that diagnosis
publically, and ESPECIALLY for the purpose of venting
his frustration--because he's a credentialed
professional, and his word therefore carries much
Please take a breather Judy. You’re up to 37 posts by my count.
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.13.0/980 - Release Date: 8/30/2007
6:05 PM
---But it's also strange for an editor to banter back and forth
endlessly as in: [J = Judy, M = John Manning]:
J: Yes you are!
M: No I'm not!
J: Yes you are!
M: No I'm not!
J: Yes you are!
M: No I'm not!
etc.
endlessly, though it is rather amusing; I like it to a certain
extent, it's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 31, 2007, at 12:54 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
But even if he WERE psychotic, it would STILL be
unethical for Peter to deliver that diagnosis
publically, and ESPECIALLY for the purpose of venting
his
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tertonzeno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---But it's also strange for an editor to banter back and forth
endlessly as in: [J = Judy, M = John Manning]:
J: Yes you are!
M: No I'm not!
J: Yes you are!
M: No I'm not!
J: Yes you are!
M: No I'm not!
etc.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of nablus108
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 10:04 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: An Inspiring Visit to Baba
On Aug 31, 2007, at 2:06 PM, authfriend wrote:
Vaj means to say, of course, It's pretty strange for
an editor to claim they're different. He's the one
claiming there's no distinction between them.
No, that's not what I'm claiming.
Rick Archer wrote:
It seems that no matter how clearly someone relates an experience,
you misunderstand it. Michael just related the time Muktananda
visited MMY, and at one point in the evening, sat next to MMY on
his couch and hugged him. Hundreds of people were there and it was
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Dean Goodman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My meaning was clear: in lecture halls or group meetings, in
the places where I and most people saw Maharishi, whether live
or on videotape, in those thousands of hours that most of us
could witness
Dr. Peter Sutphen wrote:
Don't stop now, babycakes.
So, it has been established that both the Marshy and
the Mukta were reprobates in a conspiracy to seduce
their female students and then tried to cover it up.
And it has been established that the Marshy and the
Mukta actualy met in public
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Richard J. Williams
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 10:18 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: An Inspiring Visit to Baba Muktananda
And the moderator of a spiritual forum won't answer my
And the moderator of a spiritual forum won't answer
my simple question of What happened to all the money.
Rick Archer wrote:
But seriously, what money are you asking about?
All the money collected by the TMO enablers since 1956.
Other questions:
How much TMO money has been sent to
Troll:
And the moderator of a spiritual forum won't answer my
simple question of What happened to all the money
Me:(acting a bit trollish)
If Rick would just accept his omniscient status conferred by his being
a moderator it would solve a lot of problems here. Just the other day
I asked him
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Richard J. Williams
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 11:11 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: An Inspiring Visit to Baba Muktananda
And the moderator of a spiritual forum won't answer
my
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Troll:
And the moderator of a spiritual forum won't answer my
simple question of What happened to all the money
Me:(acting a bit trollish)
If Rick would just accept his omniscient status conferred by his being
Michael Dean Goodman wrote:
I resent being used!
So, Dr. Goodman, you think that a visit by the Mukta, a
known profligate, with the Marshy, a known sexual pervert,
was an inspirational experience, yet, if what Rick and
the others allege is true, would be a travesty of the
spiritual life - a
And what recompense has been given to the victims
since the alleged events occurred?
Rick Archer wrote:
Not sure what you're talking about here.
Has the Marshy anyone ever offered to help in the
rehabilitation of the women who suffered from the
sexual predations of the Marshy or the
Michael Dean Goodman wrote:
I call Maharishi by the name he uses to speak of himself.
This is common courtesy. To change someone's name (to
shorten it, make it 'cutesy', or whatever - as in 'The
Marshy') is usually the mark of strongly-gripped
individual ego - either to show off, or
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Richard J. Williams
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 12:11 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: An Inspiring Visit to Baba Muktananda
And what recompense has been given to the victims
Has the Marshy anyone ever offered to help in the
rehabilitation of the women who suffered from the
sexual predations of the Marshy or the Mukta?
Rick Archer wrote:
I don't think he feels responsible for Muk's behavior.
But Marshy gave the Mukta a public hug - that sort of
indicates
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
