--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig lengli...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
On Feb 2, 2009, at 2:13 AM, sparaig wrote:
Median income for physics PHD
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Hugo richardhughes...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
On
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
On Feb 2, 2009, at 2:13 AM, sparaig wrote:
Median income for physics PHD with 20+ years of experience:
$125,000
ANd Hagelin isn't any old
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
On top of that we're now importing scientists from India and China
thanks to runaway use of H1B visas which further depresses
salaries... The Corporation gets what corporation wants...
While not explicit racism, this
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi ???
i was talking with a friend about this just today, and she
reminded
me that money management is never the forte of these spiritual
teachers, from whatever perspective they teach, especially
On Feb 2, 2009, at 9:54 AM, grate.swan wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
On top of that we're now importing scientists from India and China
thanks to runaway use of H1B visas which further depresses
salaries... The Corporation gets what corporation
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
On Feb 2, 2009, at 2:13 AM, sparaig wrote:
Median income for physics PHD with 20+ years of experience:
$125,000
ANd Hagelin isn't any old median physicist, despite what people here
like to pretend.
He's been out
On Feb 2, 2009, at 12:11 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Hagelin could could be making far more than that by taking a
teaching research post at any major research university...
With all due respect, Lawson, you clearly have
no idea what professors are paid, or even people
in prestigious research labs
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
On Feb 2, 2009, at 2:13 AM, sparaig wrote:
Median income for physics PHD with 20+ years of experience:
$125,000
ANd Hagelin isn't any old median physicist, despite what people here
like to pretend.
He's been out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
On Feb 2, 2009, at 2:13 AM, sparaig wrote:
Median income for physics PHD with 20+ years of experience:
$125,000
ANd Hagelin isn't any old
On Feb 2, 2009, at 3:45 PM, boo_lives wrote:
He's made innumerable public statements that would immediately
disqualify him from consideration from any quality university faculty
position. What physics has he published recently? Nothing and that's
crucial to faculty positions.
Also, we know
On Feb 2, 2009, at 4:32 PM, ruthsimplicity wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
On Feb 2, 2009, at 2:13 AM, sparaig wrote:
Median income for physics PHD with 20+ years of experience:
$125,000
ANd Hagelin isn't any old median physicist, despite what
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 1:23 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi ???
i was talking with a friend about this just today, and she
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of sparaig
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 10:23 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi ???
No one ever got rich, but the top cats are pretty well taken
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Arhata Osho
arhatafreespe...@... wrote:
Everyone has a sex life- always more than we know - right Barack!
so for now, all we have is the Maharishi's word that he
was actually a
life long celibate. absolutely no proof to the contrary.
If he works those hips like he works his brain.
- Original Message -
From: Sal Sunshine
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 3:55 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi ???
On Feb 2, 2009, at 3:45 PM, boo_lives wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer r...@... wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 1:23 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books
On Feb 2, 2009, at 2:13 AM, sparaig wrote:
Median income for physics PHD with 20+ years of experience:
$125,000
ANd Hagelin isn't any old median physicist, despite what people here
like to pretend.
He's been out of the field for how long? And with a tarnished
reputation for peddling
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer r...@... wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 1:23 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books
...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Joe Smith
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 9:33 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi ???
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , ysoy10li
ysoy10li
---Any new books on Maharishi in the last year ??
I had read here maybe a few years ago that the infamous Judy
(no, not Stein...) had
mentioned she wouldn't publish her book about her alleged
experiences with M. until after his passing...
She changed her mind and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Joe Smith msilver1...@...
wrote:
snip
Just being a jerk Rick, but it has been a year now.
Personally, I don't think the book will ever be
published.
FWIW, that it's been a year isn't really a good
reason to assume the book will never be published.
How
On Feb 1, 2009, at 12:43 AM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
oh i see, since there is nothing but hearsay regarding the
possibility of Maharishi's sexual escapades, you are more
comfortable believing the he fucked around rumors, instead of
believing the he didn't fuck around rumors?
did i get that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
On Feb 1, 2009, at 12:43 AM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
oh i see, since there is nothing but hearsay
regarding the possibility of Maharishi's sexual
escapades, you are more comfortable believing
the he fucked around
Whatever you might believe, if this were any kind of formal hearing,
the charges would be thrown out immediately. No first person
account. Strictly hearsay. Judy never gave a first person
account. Account was only through an interview with a third party.
That person seemed to have an
On Feb 1, 2009, at 9:34 AM, Vaj wrote:
On Feb 1, 2009, at 12:43 AM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
oh i see, since there is nothing but hearsay regarding the
possibility of Maharishi's sexual escapades, you are more
comfortable believing the he fucked around rumors, instead of
believing the he
On Feb 1, 2009, at 10:22 AM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote:
Whatever you might believe, if this were any kind of formal hearing,
the charges would be thrown out immediately. No first person
account. Strictly hearsay. Judy never gave a first person
account. Account was only through an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
My suspicion is that those who believe that Maharishi
couldn't possibly have fucked around believe this
because they believe he was enlightened and if the
rumor were true, that would upset their definition
of what
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
On Feb 1, 2009, at 10:22 AM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote:
Whatever you might believe, if this were any kind
of formal hearing, the charges would be thrown out
immediately. No first person account. Strictly
hearsay. Judy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_re...@...
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
My suspicion is that those who believe that Maharishi
couldn't possibly have fucked around believe this
because they believe he was enlightened and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
On Feb 1, 2009, at 12:43 AM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
oh i see, since there is nothing but hearsay regarding the
possibility of Maharishi's sexual escapades, you are more
comfortable believing the he fucked around rumors,
and we have those, like me, and i suspect the majority of those who
practice TM, who just don't know, and until something is proved one
way or another, don't care-
unlike the Maharishi bashers who are content to climb into their
igloos of ignorance and proclaim endlessly that the Maharishi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_re...@... wrote:
-that- is your standard, that something has been published in
newspapers?? unbelievable...and what about all of those health
benefits of TM that i have read published in newspapers? sorry, that
just doesn't cut
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
On Feb 1, 2009, at 9:34 AM, Vaj wrote:
On Feb 1, 2009, at 12:43 AM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
oh i see, since there is nothing but hearsay regarding the
possibility of Maharishi's sexual escapades, you are more
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Joe Smith
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 1:57 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi ???
Are you saying this with any evidence or authority Joe
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of TurquoiseB
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 4:49 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi ???
The TBs don't believe the rumors because it would
be impossible
:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Joe Smith
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 9:33 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_re...@... wrote:
and we have those, like me, and i suspect the majority of those who
practice TM, who just don't know, and until something is proved one
way or another, don't care-
unlike the Maharishi bashers who are content to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_re...@... wrote:
that- is your standard, that something has been published in
newspapers?? unbelievable...and what about all of those health
benefits of TM that i have read published in newspapers? sorry, that
just doesn't cut it, and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_re...@...
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_reply@ wrote:
-that- is your standard, that something has been
published in newspapers?? unbelievable...and what
about all of those health benefits of TM
On Feb 1, 2009, at 10:42 AM, Richard M wrote:
The newspaper in question that you link to - the News of the World -
has a reputation for being the pits of the pits of the UK gutter
press. It's barely more than a comic.
Yeah, but it's high-class journalism compared to the
pits of the American
]
On Behalf Of Joe Smith
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 1:57 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi ???
Are you saying this with any evidence or authority Joe, or is this
just
the way you wish it were?
Just being a jerk Rick
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunsh...@...
wrote:
On Feb 1, 2009, at 10:42 AM, Richard M wrote:
The newspaper in question that you link to - the News of the World -
has a reputation for being the pits of the pits of the UK gutter
press. It's barely more than a
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Vaj
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 9:25 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi ???
I would like to see some resolution on the matter since the charges
so for now, all we have is the Maharishi's word that he was actually a
life long celibate. absolutely no proof to the contrary.
the rest is just rumors, and for a public figure who was in close
proximity to thousands of people, some with agendas of their own,
there are always lots of rumors.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer r...@... wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Joe Smith
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 1:57 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of curtisdeltablues
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 11:10 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi ???
Speaking of books, Curtis, I still think you could write
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi ???
Are you saying this with any evidence or authority Joe, or is this
just
the way you wish it were?
Just being a jerk Rick, but it has been a year now. Personally, I
don't think
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer r...@... wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of TurquoiseB
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 4:49 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Richard M
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 11:19 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi ???
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_re...@... wrote:
i am curious why some of those here, like Vaj, and Curtis and
geezerfreak and Barry feel it is so important to cling deperately to
the possibility that the Maharishi was a liar in terms of his sex life?
Cling
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of lurkernomore20002000
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 11:25 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi ???
You may be right. I wonder how many of us would
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltabl...@... wrote:
snip
And is everyone here going to buy the
book? I doubt it. There are just not enough people
to support a published book. She could go the self
published route, but again so much work just to get
a lot of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer r...@... wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of curtisdeltablues
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 11:10 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer r...@... wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of lurkernomore20002000
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 11:25 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltabl...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_reply@ wrote:
i am curious why some of those here, like Vaj, and Curtis and
geezerfreak and Barry feel it is so important to cling
deperately
On Feb 1, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
] On Behalf Of Vaj
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 9:25 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi ???
I would like
Smith
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 1:57 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi ???
Are you saying this with any evidence or authority Joe, or is this
just
the way you wish it were?
Just being a jerk Rick, but it has
On Feb 1, 2009, at 11:33 AM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
It's not considered hearsay when it's already been published in
newspapers Dawn.
-that- is your standard, that something has been published in
newspapers?? unbelievable...and what about all of those health
benefits of TM that i have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_re...@... wrote:
i am curious why some of those here, like Vaj, and Curtis and
geezerfreak and Barry feel it is so important to cling
deperately to the possibility that the Maharishi was a liar
in terms of his sex life?
I am
1, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
] On Behalf Of Vaj
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 9:25 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi ???
I would like
i stand corrected wrt your views on this one, though you as curtis
make the blithe statement that the Mahairshi lied about so many
things. same challenge to you-- come up with five of them that can
be proved.
about the rumors, who cares about rumors? not me, but others here
use them as a
Everyone has a sex life- always more than we know - right Barack!
so for now, all we have is the Maharishi's word that he was
actually a
life long celibate. absolutely no proof to the contrary.
the rest is just rumors, and for a public figure who was in close
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
but actual provable lies.
This standard is absurd in this context. I'll give you the ones that
I know he made in my movement career that effected me personally. I
am in no position to prove any of these to you especially
considering
On Feb 1, 2009, at 11:42 AM, Richard M wrote:
The obvious question for me, Vaj, is why you should be so enthusiastic
about such a piece of tabloid journalism, when, relative to some
belief you hold dear, you would I am sure be only be too quick to cry
just tabloid journalism! (and probably
On Feb 1, 2009, at 12:09 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer r...@... wrote:
I can't imagine anyone putting in the time and trouble for something
which will be met with possibly legal battles from the movement and
such high animosity from its members.
Lots of pent up energy seems to be releasing, or imploding, on this
topic.
A perspective, not mine, but interesting to consider is that if the
Maharishi created the ability in you to clearly see past present and
future, then you could easily validate or reject any such claims
personally, by just
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltabl...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
but actual provable lies.
This standard is absurd in this context. I'll give you the ones that
I know he made in my movement career that effected
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_re...@... wrote:
now we have the latest tempest in a pisspot (with thanks to Barry
for that phrase...), regarding the TBs insisting that the Maharishi
acted in sexually inappropriate ways.
Hey, ED, thanks for acknowledging my
Hi Dawn, I guess this is directed at me?
On Feb 1, 2009, at 12:56 PM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
once again, the real TBs on FFL are being exposed. first it was all
the bullshit flavored hoopla about the practice of TM, until it was
discoved that those making all of the negative noise were
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard M compost...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
but actual provable lies.
This standard is absurd in this context. I'll
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
On Feb 1, 2009, at 11:42 AM, Richard M wrote:
The obvious question for me, Vaj, is why you should be so enthusiastic
about such a piece of tabloid journalism, when, relative to some
belief you hold dear, you would I am
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltabl...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard M compost1uk@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_re...@... wrote:
i stand corrected wrt your views on this one, though you as curtis
make the blithe statement that the Mahairshi lied about so many
things. same challenge to you-- come up with five of them that can
be proved.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltabl...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard M compost1uk@
wrote:
snip
If I say to you tomorrow I think it might snow
some, and then it doesn't. What do you think -
that I LIED to you? A child might
On Feb 1, 2009, at 12:13 PM, Vaj wrote:
The only chance I can see any of this having any traction is if they
were to get on Dr. Phil or Oprah with a theme of Spiritual Incest,
etc. Throw in some priests who also had spiritually incestuous
relationships with their followers. Of course since
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
snip
I see, Linda's just the first to go on the record
for sexual exploitation then, that I'm aware of.
Linda is the *only* one to have gone on the record
(in a trashy British tabloid, under the influence
of a teacher who
On Feb 1, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Richard M wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
On Feb 1, 2009, at 11:42 AM, Richard M wrote:
The obvious question for me, Vaj, is why you should be so
enthusiastic
about such a piece of tabloid journalism, when, relative to
On Feb 1, 2009, at 2:05 PM, Sal Sunshine wrote:
On Feb 1, 2009, at 12:13 PM, Vaj wrote:
The only chance I can see any of this having any traction is if
they were to get on Dr. Phil or Oprah with a theme of Spiritual
Incest, etc. Throw in some priests who also had spiritually
I was in the lecture hall when Maharishi was asked about the promise
of 5 - 8 years to get to CC.
He said, No, no, no, not for you. Only two years for initiators.
I kept track of my meditation time while at TTC, and I ended up with
five years' worth of 20 mins twice a day as my total, so I was
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
All good points. The broader issue is one of credibility. That
evaluation is made in a more full context than the simple telling of a
lie within its strictest definition. We build an impression of a
person's integrity and what
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltabl...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
All good points. The broader issue is one of
credibility. That evaluation is made in a more
full context than the simple telling of a lie
On Feb 1, 2009, at 2:22 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
I gave my examples and you pointed out that I can't prove some of them
are lies because we can't prove Maharishi's intent. That doesn't
prove that many of my examples are not lies, just that I can't prove
it here to your satisfaction because
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltabl...@...
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
but actual provable lies.
This standard is absurd in this context. I'll give you the ones that
I know he made in my movement career that effected
On Feb 1, 2009, at 2:16 PM, Vaj wrote:
However, wouldn't it be fair to to say, after a certain point, if
someone's statements and promises consistently turn out to be false
(esp. in their favor), that they are lying. Up to a certain point,
one could argue about circumstances and it might
On Feb 1, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Sal Sunshine wrote:
On Feb 1, 2009, at 2:16 PM, Vaj wrote:
However, wouldn't it be fair to to say, after a certain point, if
someone's statements and promises consistently turn out to be false
(esp. in their favor), that they are lying. Up to a certain point,
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of lurkernomore20002000
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 11:31 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi ???
Kinda like the Bible saying every word in this book
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wayback71 waybac...@...
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
but actual provable lies.
This standard is absurd in this context. I'll
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
HH the 14th Dalai Lama has said publicly that when a guru is found
Who, what 14'th ? What is this about HH, are they are wearing very
strange hats, no ?
This Buddhist politician fellow who left his homeland open to the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer r...@... wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of lurkernomore20002000
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 11:31 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 no_re...@...
wrote:
i am still of the belief that no one ever got rich in the TM
movement, that the TMO was, and is, chronically overextended,
underfunded, and managed by the most devout vs. the most competent,
to say the least.
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of authfriend
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 1:06 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi ???
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_re...@...
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_reply@
wrote:
i am still of the belief that no one ever got rich in the TM
movement, that the TMO was, and is, chronically overextended,
underfunded,
Oh, if it were only true - but it's not, Nabby. Grow up. MMY did his very
best, to the very
end, for the TMO to be as widely accepted, as soon as possible.
MMY was most comfortable with a tight grip, and his insecurity over the idea
of loss of
complete control precluded the best
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_re...@... wrote:
I was in the lecture hall when Maharishi was asked about the promise
of 5 - 8 years to get to CC.
He said, No, no, no, not for you. Only two years for initiators.
I kept track of my meditation time while at TTC, and I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltabl...@...
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_reply@ wrote:
i am curious why some of those here, like Vaj, and Curtis and
geezerfreak and Barry feel it is so important to cling deperately to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 mainstream20...@...
wrote:
Oh, if it were only true - but it's not, Nabby. Grow up. MMY did his very
best, to the
very
end, for the TMO to be as widely accepted, as soon as possible.
MMY was most comfortable with a tight grip,
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of enlightened_dawn11
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 3:30 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi ???
thanks for the best post so far on all of this, in my
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 4:01 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi ???
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of enlightened_dawn11
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 9:54 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi ???
i was talking with a friend about this just today
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
