[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently tried creating a PDF file in Finale 2006c to send a non-Finale user,
but?for some reason I was unable to switch the printer to the Acrobat
Distiller; it was not listed as an option.? I recently had a system failure
which caused me to do a system repair, the
Jón Kristinn Cortez wrote:
Hi all.
How do I get a Finale 2007c-file into GarageBand?
Cortez
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Can't GarageBand import midi files? If it can, save the Finale file
dc wrote:
Is there any way to copy only voice 2 from one measure to another?
Dennis
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Turn Show Active Layer Only on wherever they have moved it to in the
menus
Don Hart wrote:
Don't think so. With layers, you can choose 'Show active layer only' in the
options menu and if it shows, it copies. Nothing I know of like that for
voices, though.
I feel silly now, having replied with the way to copy layers -- guess
I've been using Sibelius a bit too
Bruce Hunter wrote:
Sorry, I'm the one who was not clear. Actually I hadn't meant to suggest
anything, just reporting what a reproduction of the original score
indicated.
Andrew Stiller has reminded me that recorders aren't transposing
instruments. I guess, like the bass clef instruments
Randolph Peters wrote:
Andrew Stiller wrote:
This is to let everybody know I'm back on the list. I had a
hearttransplant on 11/14/07, and recovery has been long and difficult.
Kallisti Music Press reopened for business a few days ago, including
online.
Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music
Andrew Stiller wrote:
This is to let everybody know I'm back on the list. I had a
hearttransplant on 11/14/07, and recovery has been long and difficult.
Kallisti Music Press reopened for business a few days ago, including
online.
Welcome back, Andrew! Your presence has been
Daniel Wolf wrote:
As long as we're on the subject of a hard copy of the manual: I've
assumed that neither Finale nor Sibelius offers a hard copy simply
because it is too much trouble to produce. But given the fact that the
manuals exist in printable forms, it's somewhat puzzling that neither
Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Yeah, turns out it is $30 plus shipping, and they say they don't offer a
printed version ... so I guess they are talking a CD.
It is the printed version they're talking about, isn't it? the manual
installed with the program as an on-line documentation file.
--
Doug Walter wrote:
I thought I'd bring up something that I haven't seen mentioned (it may
have come up before and I didn't notice) in hopes of saving others some
time and potential frustration.
In working on a score in 2008, I found myself using Command-F to flip
tuplets from above to below
Darcy James Argue wrote:
Hi Doug,
On Mac, the command key is the override key for linked parts. When you
perform an action with the command key held down (like, for instance,
dragging an expression), you are telling Finale to override the default
behavior w/r/t linked parts and do the
To further discuss Doug's frustration -- My problem has been the fact
that for so many versions, Finale's changes have been more evolutionary,
minor changes from one version to the next so that anybody who had
upgraded regularly was never hit with a large re-learning curve. Even
when they
Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
I noted in a recent post that someone mentioned one could obtain a hard
copy of the Sib 5 vade mecum for no charge. If true, where does one
access it?
What do you mean by Sib 5 vade mecum?
--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 01:46 PM 4/22/2008, John Howell wrote:
Please forgive the Latin challenged, but what does that sentence mean?
He's looking for a hard copy of the Sibelius manual.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vade_mecum
Aaron.
___
Finale
You may have to log in first, I can't remember, but you could check
under Upgrade or simply click on Contact Us or whatever similar link
they have and ask there about ordering the manual. You'll most likely
have to give them your serial number at the time of the order. Sibelius
is very
dc wrote:
David W. Fenton écrit:
Have you tried using the selection tool with them? I don't recall if
this gets handles, or just allows you to move/delete a word extension
continued on a new system, but it's worth a try maybe?
There's no way I can find to get them to move down to the next
dc wrote:
Charpentier, in his manuscript, uses the following notation for the end
of a vocal melisma:
http://www.philomela.net/ex/charpentier.jpg
With the quarter note at the end of the second measure shifted one 16th
of the beat.
How would you render this measure in a performing edition?
A-NO-NE Music wrote:
Martin Banner / 08.4.17 / 10:11 AM wrote:
When I called Roadrunner and explained the situation, they told me that
someone administratively at Finale list needs to go to the following
URL:
Sorry, but it doesn't work that way. There is no reason for your ISP
listing
dc wrote:
Trying to add measures in a piece in Fin2008. So I select a measure, go
to Add measures in the Edit menu, enter 5, OK, and nothing happens!
Tried several times, including with only 1, and still no new measures.
So, what am I doing wrong?
I don't know -- I just tried it on a
Christopher Smith wrote:
On Apr 16, 2008, at 8:39 AM, dc wrote:
dhbailey écrit:
Why we can add measures at the end without ever knowing what a
measure stack is yet we can't insert measures we have to know
that we really want to insert a measure stack escapes me. Either
we're adding
Neal Gittleman wrote:
Not looking a gift horse here, mind you...
I'm working on a project in FinMac2k8b. It has some crescendos and
diminuendos that are written out (cresc. or dim. as measure
expressions). When I play the file back to proofread, it's making
crescendos and diminuendos as
John Hinchey wrote:
Hi all,
Am I missing something? Is there a plugin that will convert note
attached expressions to measure attached expressions?
TGTools has the option to move them from measure-attached to
staff-attached or note-attached, but it doesn't seem to have the option
to move
Kim Richmond wrote:
I am having a disk space issue. It might not be a Finale issue, but I
think it is.
I recently updated from MacFin2007 to 2008. I installed the program
along with the Garriton Sounds that came along with it. Before this I
had 50 GB hard drive space available. After
Christopher Smith wrote:
[snip] Wow, six days late! I just got this now after posting on March 29th!
Makes me sound like I never check my email, or are always commenting on
something someone said before but now the conversation has moved on...
Christopher
Yeah, I've noticed some
dc wrote:
Darcy James Argue écrit:
Are the ties the same note, or are you trying to tie an enharmonic
equivalent (C# to Db, for instance)?
That's it! I just checked, and realize that the accidental was missing
on the second note!
Many thanks, Darcy.
And sorry for the stupid question!
Matthew Hindson fastmail acct wrote:
[snip] However I have wondered why there aren't more Indians teaching
themselves Finale and Sibelius and offering their services.
Because there's not much of a market for our services. Face it, people
aren't beating down many of our doors, demanding our
Kim Richmond wrote:
Is there a way to convert Sibelius files into Finale files? I forget how
if I once knew.
All the best,
KIM R
You need to buy the Dolet plugin for Sibelius. This allows you to export
a Sibelius file to MusicXML which Finale can import without purchasing
the full Dolet for
dc wrote:
Matthew Hindson fastmail acct écrit:
However I have wondered why there aren't more Indians teaching
themselves Finale and Sibelius and offering their services.
Not sure they'd be willing to work for the low wages offered ;-(
And there is a whole lot more knowledge required beyond
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And how is that that P. T. Barnum had it? No one ever went broke
understimating the taste of the American people?
That of course supposes there is some level of taste which is some sort
of threshold, implying that there is higher taste and lower taste which
would be
Of the three examples, I find the bottom one the clearest, with the top
one next in clarity.
The middle one is confusing to me, seeing cue-sized notes in place of
the final chord.
--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
Christopher Smith wrote:
On Apr 3, 2008, at 12:13 AM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
All I am saying is that a works suitability for reinterpretation
(whether its arranging, covering, remixing, making mashups, or
something else entirely) bears absolutely no relation to its quality.
Few people
Well, I would hate to make a sweeping generalization such as those that
have tried have all failed very badly, in my estimation based on a
single person's interpretation. Only when you've heard a significant
number, could such a statement have any validity.
I personally think any of
Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
I got a music typesetting spam from India, and decided to have a look
at the document:
http://printclassicalmusic.com/files/sample.pdf
The document properties show no music fonts, and it being done in Adobe
Illustrator. A big magnification shows that the symbols
Christopher Smith wrote:
On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:32 AM, dhbailey wrote:
Then it's a pretty poor piece of music, if it depends more on the
personality of the performer than the quality of the music.
Can I offer a different example in jazz?
The Charles Mingus band, even when he was sick
Neal Gittleman wrote:
Pace those who think differently, Beethoven doesn't seem to have much
problem with either formulation...
dottted-quarter plus three eighths is all over the first movement of the
Eroica (well, strictly speaking, not, since he always writes it as
quarter, eighth-rest,
Darcy James Argue wrote:
Context is everything, but as a general rule, my own preference is:
On 31 Mar 2008, at 3:45 PM, dc wrote:
Can or should one beam together three 8ths after a dotted quarter in 3/4?
No.
And 4 8ths after a quarter?
Yes.
Cheers,
- Darcy
Hesitating to merely echo
David McKay wrote:
I'm interested to know if it is worth upgrading to Finale 2008. I'm using
Winfin 2004, and am interested in features which might make inputting the
music easier or which improve the look of what is produced.
I mainly do simple stuff like inputting a part to transpose simply
David W. Fenton wrote:
[snip] Nobody eats bubble gum for nutrition, but it's quite fun for
entertainment.
I guess I'm saying that even crap has its place.
You get no argument from me on that point.
But then would something that shines at being crap be the worst of
American Pop or the best
David W. Fenton wrote:
On 27 Mar 2008 at 12:53, Chuck Israels wrote:
This was an unusual period
of sophisticated common practice in the world of American popular
music and jazz, and I believe that there was a considerably higher
percentage of good quality, durable music than Sturgeon's
Michael Greensill wrote:
[snip] Of course there's both sides to a story - the professionals in the
1950's, like Mitch Miller brought us amazing crap that probably ushered
in the excesses of the rock era.
How dare you throw such an insult at the man with the guts to take a
couple of oboe solos
Michael Greensill wrote:
How dare you throw such an insult at the man with the guts to take a
couple of oboe solos on the Charlie Parker With Strings sessions? ;-)
That's the weird thing about him. He was a hip guy. All the stuff did
did for Alec Wilder.
But then he made Rosie Clooney sing
David W. Fenton wrote:
On 26 Mar 2008 at 8:18, Chuck Israels wrote:
Joe Schwantner writes gorgeous music that I find difficult to read (my
limitation - not the notation's) because he makes a point of choosing
small note values;
It seems to me that this statement of yours show that you
David W. Fenton wrote:
On 26 Mar 2008 at 6:39, dhbailey wrote:
David W. Fenton wrote:
On 23 Mar 2008 at 21:55, Owain Sutton wrote:
(Why
notate anything as 2/2, if it's likely to be heard as 2/4?)
This kind of comment makes me crazy.
You notate it as 2/2 because MUSICIANS PLAY
David W. Fenton wrote:
On 27 Mar 2008 at 0:12, John Howell wrote:
At 5:18 PM -0500 3/26/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cut time in 3? Is that the Zeffiro Torna meter?
Not in the Malipiero edition, if my memory is anywhere close to
accurate. But 3/2 is fairly common in later Baroque music
David W. Fenton wrote:
On 26 Mar 2008 at 22:25, Christopher Smith wrote:
Major new features in 2008 include linked parts
Linked parts were added in 2007, no?
Yes, but the question was about upgrading from 2005, so the option of
upgrading to 2007 isn't available.
Thus to a 2005 user,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do recall Raymond Lewenthal's Romantic Revival that went through at
least three record labels before sputtering out. An Indiana-based pianist
named Frank Cooper did find some good stuff--IIRC he recorded the Ignaz
Brüll 2nd piano concert. But as a whole, the 19th
David W. Fenton wrote:
On 27 Mar 2008 at 6:28, dhbailey wrote:
I think I would begin such a class with the statement 90% of anything
is crap. That includes the Baroque Era of music history, which we will
be studying in this class. You're lucky in that we will be studying the
10% of Baroque
Chuck Israels wrote:
On Mar 27, 2008, at 3:28 AM, dhbailey wrote:
Most music appreciation classes leave the class members with the
impression that the historical music history periods all produced only
masterworks by superior composers and fail to address the fact that
much of what
shirling neueweise wrote:
But at the heart of any music, new or old, complicated or simple, lies
John's question. For some, the music of Ferneyhough is just such a
music that makes them say Wow, that's a challenge and I love a
challenge and I'm going to master this and show the old farts
David W. Fenton wrote:
On 23 Mar 2008 at 21:55, Owain Sutton wrote:
(Why
notate anything as 2/2, if it's likely to be heard as 2/4?)
This kind of comment makes me crazy.
You notate it as 2/2 because MUSICIANS PLAY IT DIFFERENTLY THAN THE
PLAY 2/4.
Certain styles of music make more sense
Christopher Smith wrote:
[snip] (An interesting exception to the jazz swing convention: the tune
All
Blues, which for some odd reason is usually notated in 6/8 with swing
16ths, rather than the more conventional 6/4 with swung 8ths (like two
bars of jazz waltz). Nutty.)
But demonstrating
A-NO-NE Music wrote:
Darcy James Argue / 08.3.25 / 0:44 AM wrote:
But respectfully -- reading Desifinado written in 2/4 versus 4/4,
not so much. If someone isn't familiar with the authentic bossa
groove, handing them a chart in 2/4 isn't magically going to make them
sound more convincing.
John Howell wrote:
[snip] I can agree with that, certainly, but it isn't really the right
starting
point. That starting point has to be the simple question, what is
there about this music that will make it worth the time and effort to
learn to play it? (Or sing it, which is an order of
Christopher Smith wrote:
On Mar 23, 2008, at 4:10 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
Hi Owain,
On 23 Mar 2008, at 10:36 AM, Owain Sutton wrote:
incompleteness of tuplets,
using the names for note durations that actually tell you how long
the notes are.
What struck me immediately is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Select Mass Edit Tool - press 5. this will give the total for the entire
piece. If you select a section it will give the timing of the section.
There's a mass-edit tool in Fin2008? Where?
--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ray Horton wrote:
Am I nuts?
In 2008a, where has the command to tell how long the piece, or section
of the piece, gone? I can't find it anywhere, and the manual is no help.
Raymond Horton
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 20/03/2008 08:37:49 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There's a mass-edit tool in Fin2008? Where?
Erm..sorry. Yet another case of half read a message on my way out to work
syndrome. I didn't read the 2008 bit.
Sorry if I
Henry E. Howey wrote:
I use SHARPEYE a lot for my work in editions. One of my techniques is to
use the REBAR command to return measures to empty after converted by
MUSICXML. The odd behavior is the removal of all dotted notes to their
replacement by their components - a dotted 8th-16th becomes
Jari Williamsson wrote:
David Froom wrote:
I have FinMac 2007. For the life of me, I cannot find how to change
the ruler display from epvu units into inches. I searched the OL
manual, and found something through the shape designer box (which
doesn't apply), and it seems to not to have a
Darcy James Argue wrote:
On Mac, Program Options are not in the Edit menu -- they are in Finale
2008 - Preferences.
And for some reason, they figure Windows users don't have preferences
so we don't even get that menu. :-)
--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard Smith wrote:
John Howell wrote:
I do hate the automatic justification feature, but I seem to be
the only one who does.
[snip]
But, I suggest working with the auto justification for a while first.
Once you get a feel for what it's doing, you'll feel like you are in
control again
Leigh Daniels wrote:
Is there a way to select a region containing notes and have Finale
convert the notes to rests of the same durations?
Highlight the notes you want converted and hit the backspace key.
--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Darcy James Argue wrote:
Hi all,
Yes, I know I should actually join the Sibelius list and ask it over
there, but I haven't gotten around to doing so yet, and the Sib users
here are, so far, very knowledgeable and helpful, so...
I am having a recurring problem with Sibelius where it will
Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Just another passing question on Sib. 5 (OS 10.4.11), I want to change
(edit) note heads from normal to diamonds for a Handbell score. I
followed the instructions (in the Edit Note heads dialog box), I think,
but so far, can not get them to change. Anyone else with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting how much confidence a group of musicians is putting in record
company executives to know and deliver what's good. Who here has not had
the experience of having music thrown in the trash without being
considered by some executive type or other gatekeeper?
Christopher Smith wrote:
On Mar 6, 2008, at 6:16 PM, Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
Some even suggest that the concept of the album is pretty much dead.
Oh, I forgot to add:
In the case of jazz albums, some of the most accurate and well-written
jazz scholarship appears (appeared?) on album
Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
Dennis Collins asked a question a while back on accidentals, and I have my
own this time:
http://www.bytenet.net/kpclow/music/accidentals.JPG
The questioned notes are highlighted in pink.
The bottom stave in pink represents what the manuscript source has.
I added a ( #)
Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
[snip] I think it's very exciting to be able to do all this, and while
I'm not sure
where the dust will settle on all this (distribution seems to be
a big issue still for independent publishers), I'm very curious for other
thoughts on this entire process. I know many
with scrolling playback on Vista.
Just a thought . . .
David H. Bailey
Kurt Gnos wrote:
Yep, have it checked, and it's quite a fast notebook, Duo 2.0 GigaHz, 2 GB
RAM.
Kurt
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
Auftrag von dhbailey
Gesendet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Personally I have thought about and would love to see something like
an independent music publishers co-operative which, if large enough,
might actually give the big guys a run for their money. Â In my
conversations with music teachers (much of my music is
Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
[snip]
But wouldn't you say that is true for what the big boys did as well? Big
boys meaning
large media outlets, such a record labels, book publishers, etc. There were
a few things
that sold really well, that allowed those businesses to work, while the
other 90 percent
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
I suppose. The Jazz Big Band has a lot more and better options as
well.
That was the whole logic behind Garritan's willingness to let Finale
license a subset of their sounds -- show people what the possibilities
are but leave out just enough important
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Erg, that is frustrating. So, instead of getting a complete sound set
that someone could use to compose, upgrading to Finale 2008 gets you
colored noteheads and boomwhacker sounds..I don't think Sibelius
5's sounds lack a bari sax..
To be fair, the SmartMusic
easily combine Garritan sounds and
MM SmartMusic SoftSynth sounds in the same document.
Cheers,
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 5 Mar 2008, at 12:52 PM, dhbailey wrote:
With Finale, one has to make a choice -- it's all or nothing. Either
use the higher quality samples and just
Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Inre Sib 5, I still have not been able, no matter what I adjust, to make
the Sib 5 playback sounds (Sound Essentials) even remotely sound as
good as Fin. bundled GPO samples. At best, they sound tinny, pretty much
like Fin non-GPO sounds. I'm really disappointed with
Kurt Gnos wrote:
Hi,
while on my desktop pc running xp scrolling during playback, in page view,
is no problem, on my notebook running Vista it just does not seem to work.
It just doesn't scroll at all.
Any hints?
In your notebook installation, do you have scrolling playback enabled?
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
I helped out a friend this weekend get a new computer (Vista.ugh),
and we set up Finale 2008. He wants to write big band arrangements,
and was really excited to have a computer powerful enough to run the
Garritan sounds.
Anyhow, we were setting up some of his templates
Just a guess, but you may be up against the randomizing aspect of HP.
It's not supposed to play each note exactly the same in a mechanical
method, which would account for the discrepancies in the lengths of the
notes as well as in any nuances of dynamics.
Why doesn't the plug-in work with HP
John Howell wrote:
At 6:07 AM -0500 2/27/08, dhbailey wrote:
Interesting, if they're supposed to detune their lowest string by a
semitone, how do you feel about modern basses playing the part with
the extension on the low string? It would certainly be a different
tone than a detuned string
A-NO-NE Music wrote:
This is kinda yet another graphic problem. I am currently on
FinMac2008a on OSX10.5.2.
I often write a pattern for an instrument,
place repeat signs graphically to bracket the pattern,
then draw an arrow to the right to indicate infinity loop till cue.
This used to work
Ray Horton wrote:
I read somewhere that Respighi had some instruments made for the piece,
but I don't know where I read it. The parts (3 pairs, sop, alto,
ten/bass) say something like Buccina (flicorno basso) etc. I believe
the alto parts do give flugelhorn in parenthesis. The parts are
Darcy James Argue wrote:
Ray,
I don't see what the controversy is. Obviously it's better to have the
instruments the composer actually calls for whenever possible. I would
love to hear a performance with buccini.
But it's not like cellos and basses aren't generally available for a
Ray Horton wrote:
I said that in case you were going anywhere with G-string. But if I
read you incorrectly, I apologize.
My daughter is a 31 year-old professional musician. You will get
similar sentiments from _at least_ 90% of the pro violinists you talk
to, at least the ones with good
shirling neueweise wrote:
Tread carefully.
For starters, the violinist is my daughter.
in other words, you are completely unbiased on the subject 8-)
mouthclosedmodeON
When I asked a good violinist about detuning the G string, she said
That's why God made violas.
there are just too
dc wrote:
Lawrence David Eden écrit:
Happily, I am using an older version of Finale. I have no complaints
as Finale has been my faithful servant for years. Can users of later
versions of Finale say the same?
Well, after complaining loudly myself, I don't think (Win) 2008a is that
bad. I
Lawrence David Eden wrote:
From what I keep reading on our List, it sounds like Finale has become
so bug-ridden that it should be avoided. Instead of asking which is
faster, I want to know if Sibelius is more reliable than Finale 2K8x.
Happily, I am using an older version of Finale. I have
shirling neueweise wrote:
From a copyist, composers generally [expect] their score to be copied
exactly as they gave it, no more and no less.
i won't say where this came from other than to mention it is from a
composer and was sent to an experienced and diligent copyist i know.
i know
David W. Fenton wrote:
On 22 Feb 2008 at 15:31, Christopher Smith wrote:
I have played parts that were scanned in from the score, then sliced
into long ribbons and pasted with Photoshop into a new document, then
printed. It was next to illegible. The guy thought he was saving
copyists
Barbara Touburg wrote:
Ton Koopman had to do this for a series of Mozart concerts in Japan,
the NMA
had no parts available for rent, so he used this as a solution, but I get
the impression he used a Xerox machine and glue sticks ;)
Koopman (his name means merchant...) doesn't care a lot
Stig Christensen wrote:
Hi,
That's correct!
The 2008b has disappeared!
In the same momentum I can't even launch Finale 2008a on my MacPro.
Thought I was going to start a rather large project today. Now I'm
sitting watching the TimeMachine (should be LongTimeMachine)
rebuilding my system drive!
Darcy James Argue wrote:
What, specifically, is slowing you down in Finale? My general impression
is that Sibelius is still somewhat easier to learn, but expert Finale
users can work more quickly and more efficiently, especially if you make
full use of third-party plugins.
Back when I was a
Matthew Voogt wrote:
Hello Everyone,
My name is Matthew Voogt. I am new to the list and would just like to
say hello. I have a website called The Finale School
(http://www.thefinaleschool.com).
It is a website that is totally free and offers video tutorials about
anything and everything
Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 03:33 AM 2/20/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand, and experience seems to bear this out, that computers
running
under WindowsXP will gradually run slower and slower over a period of
time.
I'm not sure why this would be so, and it certainly has not been my
dc wrote:
Matthew Voogt écrit:
It is a website that is totally free and offers video tutorials about
anything and everything related to Finale. Check it out... let me know
what you think.
Where one reads:
What [sic] to see all those locke0d [sic] videos?! A one time fee will
give you access
Chuck Israels wrote:
Hi all,
2008b is out and purports to solve the freeze on quit problem. I will
shout hallelujah, if it proves to be true.
Windows users don't get excited -- there isn't a 2008b for Windows, at
least not yet.
--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adam Golding wrote:
Eric,
I have used both Sibelius and Finale. Sibelius is currently faster for me,
but I know it somewhat better than Finale---further practice on finale might
make it faster for me, on the other hand, further practice might be futile.
I agree that each program will produce
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Exactly. That is why it was a stupid question. One really needs to try
them out and come to their own conclusions based on how they do things.
And here all my teachers told me there were no stupid questions. :-(
In defense of the question, he's really asking for
Robert Patterson wrote:
Well, I wouldn't go so far as to say it is a stupid question. But it
is a question that whose answer is very individual.
The only reason I chime in here is to mention that if you are not
making full use of 3rd-party plugins, and also using a 3rd-party
keyboard macro
Martin Banner wrote:
I have been away for a week at a conference and had postings from Finale
stopped. Could someone tell me what happened to Andrew Stiller?
His wife unsubscribed him from this list way last Summer because of
heart health issues. He's currently in the hospital.
--
David
Owain Sutton wrote:
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Exactly. That is why it was a stupid question. One really
needs to try
them out and come to their own conclusions based on how
they do things.
And here all my teachers told me there were no stupid questions. :-(
In defense of the question, he's
601 - 700 of 2935 matches
Mail list logo
