+1 on the idea, seems like a winner to me.
-- T.J.
On May 25, 8:35 pm, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com wrote:
Great idea.
Would you mind submitting a patch with tests?
Thanks,
Tobie
On May 25, 12:01 pm, Johan Arensman johanm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
I was just
into mod_validator[3] for Apache.
[1] http://validator.w3.org/
[2] http://validator.w3.org/docs/help.html#others
[3] http://apache.webthing.com/mod_validator/
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
Independent Software Consultant
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On May 6, 12:33 pm, walther diechmann
://prototype.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8886-prototype/overview
--
T.J. Crowder
Independent Software Consultant
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On Apr 15, 2:03 pm, Dziamid dzia...@gmail.com wrote:
Event.observe(window, 'load', function () {
alert('1');});
Event.observe(window, 'load', function
Tobie,
I'd like the perfect solution as much as anybody, I just haven't
bumped into it yet.
If you have, please speak up. If not, please spare me that kind of
remarks. They're just completely counter-productive
Oh for cryin' out loud, Tobie. There are roughly 50 wiki engines out
there that
, Mislav Marohnić mislav.maroh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 09:47, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
We'll have to disagree on that, then, and it's your project. For a
project I was running, I would consider it a completely unacceptable
barrier to non-code
Tobie,
I'm just not going to continue this, it's a pointless aggravation for
both of us.
Have a good one,
-- T.J.
On Apr 9, 1:10 pm, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh for cryin' out loud, Tobie. There are roughly 50 wiki engines out
there that make contributing a darn sight
+1 on more information outside the core team on where Prototype is
headed, agnostic as to what form it takes. Since this is the core
mailing list, it seems like it would be here, but I don't recall
mention of the new layout stuff or on here. (Could be my memory,
though.)
-- T.J.
On Apr 8, 12:06
Yes, but we're moving away from it.
So a JavaScript solution would work now, and later (since I assume
you're moving from Mephisto to something else that *also* supports
JavaScript). If 301s work later, great, but if not there's a fallback
position.
A script included on each old API page that
...I've written an HTML to
Markdown parser:http://github.com/mislav/remark
Oh, I just know that could be very handy indeed...
-- T.J. :-)
On Apr 8, 2:51 pm, Mislav Marohnić mislav.maroh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 15:11, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com wrote:
We'll
contribution.
Installing Jekyll is rather straightforward, though.
http://wiki.github.com/mojombo/jekyll/install
Best,
Tobie
On Apr 8, 3:12 pm, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I think most on the list know that Tobie's trying to move the website
off Mephisto
Tobie,
Can we use JavaScript on Mephisto pages?
-- T.J.
On Apr 6, 6:49 pm, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com wrote:
Urm... really? You can do 404's but not 301's?
I was suggesting crating a good 404 page. Not modifying the http
response code.
Not saying I don't believe you, I'm just
My coworkers still find old docs (http://prototypejs.org/api) by googling. I
had to point them to new doc site. I think it's crucial to set up 301
redirects.
*ONLY* if all of the old information has now been ported over. Looking
at the documentation Lighthouse project[1], it looks like all of
Am I the only one who didn't realize the Sections in the list on the
left were clickable? I only found out when I followed a link to the
Ajax section from Ajax.Request, trying to find the options so I
could point someone at them.
In retrospect it's obvious that they would be, and certainly the
The new docs Andrew pushed yesterday are a HUGE leap forward! Well
done to everyone who contributed to both the content and the improved
linkability and such. Major kudos!
-- T.J. :-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype: Core group.
To post to
(Separately: Do you *really* want to publish your phone number on the web?)
Happy coding,
--
T.J. Crowder
(one of several moderators)
On 2 March 2010 10:47, Medisetti Rajesh(Dora Babu)
medisetti.raj...@gmail.com wrote:
hi friends,
Is there any way to capture the BACk BUTTON event in IE?
You
of the development of the Prototype
library, not discussion about using it. The user's discussion group is
here:
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous
...although from the discussion so far, this doesn't seem to be
related to Prototype so much as HTML and PHP.
Good luck with it,
--
T.J
mechanism and covered by unit
tests.
--
T.J. Crowder
Independent Software Consultant
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On Dec 22, 1:08 pm, Sakari Tuominen saka...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello guys!
I've been working with Javascript classes for a while now. I have been
using
Thanks for that info and link, Robert! Obviously, we who develop web
apps for normal users should leave the setting alone most of the time,
but good to know we can change it for these sorts of tests. (And wow,
I thought it was a time limit; that explains why something I was doing
the other day was
Forget the CPU cycles, it's the brain cycles I want back.
But it was all worth it to learn about JSLitmus. :-)
On Dec 17, 3:33 pm, Bob Kerns r...@acm.org wrote:
Not to be a curmudgeon about it -- I'll just point out that the CPU cycles
consumed in processing the email for this discussion far
Tobie,
A correct character encoding should be all you really need to handle
such entities.
That's rather flip, don't you think? How does character encoding
choice solve quot; or nbsp;?
These entities are valid HTML, regardless of character encoding. There
are sometimes very good reasons for
Cheers Mike!
I gave you a shout over on the user's list; didn't know you were on
this one...
-- T.J. :-)
On Nov 17, 7:24 pm, Mike Rumble mike.rum...@gmail.com wrote:
I can take some of these over the next week or so.
Will make a start promptly.
Mike.
On Nov 16, 4:15 pm, T.J. Crowder t
Hey folks,
I've just completely failed to find the time to port all of the old
docs, which is (as a whole) a much bigger job than I thought it would
be.
So there are now a bunch of merge old docs tickets[1] in Lighthouse,
each of which is just a bite-sized task (and has the mostly-formatted
).
[1] http://api.prototypejs.org/language/class.html#create-class_method
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
Independent Software Consultant
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On Nov 11, 12:26 am, joneff jon...@gmail.com wrote:
I was wondering for the longest time why doesn't Class#create have
be
a bit faster. And I say a bit, since notoriously slow means some ticks
slower.
On Nov 11, 12:44 pm, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Class.create does have arguments, details in the docs[1]. The
implementation doesn't use any _named_ arguments, it accesses its
arguments
] http://api.prototypejs.org/language/class.html
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
Independent Software Consultant
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On Nov 6, 4:23 pm, Ilya Furman smashl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
I'm wondering, why class instance is being created while
initialization method
it Function.IDENTITY instead of Function.K.
On Sep 25, 2009, at 1:26 AM, T.J. Crowder wrote:
Make sense. Shouldn't that be Function.empty and Function.k, though,
to follow our naming rules? And perhaps Function.k should have a more
meaningful name.
I'm very much in favor of all-caps
with a bit of JSON in a header. You're thinking
of when the main content comes back as application/json, in which case
it is indeed available as responseJSON.
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
Independent Software Consultant
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
Hi Robert,
It's a cool idea, but the complexity starts getting explosive
(particularly for unit testing).
If 2.0 is going to have substantial API changes (and I think it is --
Element wrappers, for one), I'd say we should save up the list of
things that -- like Joran's units thing,
I, for one, found the units used by Function#delay (for example) to be
very surprising when I first saw them, and I have to stop and think
every time I use Function#delay. The usual unit for that sort of
thing in every language I've worked in other than BASIC is
milliseconds.
That said, I don't
Hi Tobie,
Event#element has been deprecated for the longest time.
Where? Certainly not in the old API docs:
http://prototypejs.org/api/event/element
My point isn't to disagree about doing it, but that as far as the
typical user knows, this is a brand-new decision.
-- T.J.
On Oct 7, 8:08
I had no idea it's deprecated. Isn't it a bit weird to use
`findElement` without arguments to get target element?
Especially as all it does is call Event#element (in that case). Yes,
I find that a bit weird.
-- T.J.
On Oct 5, 6:45 pm, kangax kan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 5, 11:55 am, Ngan
I'm with Robert, is there a good use case for these or should we just
deprecate them?
But if we're going to get into renaming things, Enumerable#include is
crying out for an s on the end (if this thing include*s* this other
thing then...); without one it seems to say include this argument in
the
Being serious for a moment, it sounds like we're all happy (enough)
with Function.empty.
Can't say I *like* Function.identity (I'd prefer Function.passBack)
but it at least is readily defensible as being derived from
mathematics (like curry) and there are several yea vote for it in
this thread.
Andrew,
Make sense. Shouldn't that be Function.empty and Function.k, though,
to follow our naming rules? And perhaps Function.k should have a more
meaningful name.
-- T.J.
On Sep 25, 4:20 am, Andrew Dupont goo...@andrewdupont.net wrote:
Unless anyone has serious objections, or has a better
Hi,
I didn't find the other way to report bugs in prototype.js
It's described here:
http://prototypejs.org/contribute
i am quite sure it was supposed to be:
if (!responders) return element;
Indeed. Well-spotted!
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
We could _so_ overcomplicate this... ;-)
On Sep 25, 1:29 pm, Jim Higson j...@wikizzle.org wrote:
On Friday 25 September 2009 13:08:57 Rick Waldron wrote:
On the subject of end developer confusion, I'd like to make a suggestion
regarding the naming...
Function.emptyFn
Function.returnFn
, developers get
into silly quibbles as to which is better, etc. In short, they're annoying
- it's better if the framework developers make it clear what the preferred
name is, and eventually deprecate the non-preferred ones.
My $.02.
- rwk
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:19 AM, T.J. Crowder t
questions (rather than sending them through),
directing them to the user's group instead. I've also given this
group a minimal welcome message.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
Hi,
These sorts of questions are best asked in the users mailing list.[1]
This list is for core development.
(And no, you don't need to extend the element, Element#descendants
extends the elements before giving them to you.)
[1] http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous
--
T.J
@Samuel:
I've been working on this too and had quite reasonable performance
I like it, _should_ perform a *lot* better than a straight array given
a reasonable distribution of keys. This is similar to what Java's
HashMap does (not that I'm holding it up as a model of high
performance).
@Jim:
Hi Ngan,
This question is probably more appropriate for the user's group[1],
rather than the core development group. If you'll repost over there,
there are a couple of things to point out in that stuff...
[1] http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder
it as not worthwhile). I'm not aware of any plans to do
so. I suspect you'd be better off (from a performance standpoint)
building toString / fromString support into your keys.
FWIW,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On Sep 10, 7:07 pm, James Aimonetti james.aimone...@gmail.com
). I will just make this function exists in IE6
7, but not 8 for now, unless someone can tell me what exactly is
causing this.
If someone wants to, I can still attach a simple test for this.
On Sep 10, 4:07 pm, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi Viktor,
Could you put
Hi all,
I thought of a wrinkle today: Mixins. This new mechanism modifies
function instances if they override base class functions (it leaves
them alone if they don't). So if you mix in something that has a
function with the same name as a parent class's function, we will set
a $super
Hi Allen,
Thanks. I agree, it's a very edgy edge case. :-)
(wouldn't the current let you do this as well?)
Actually, it works in the current implementation, because if a mixin
function uses $super (which again is a bit odd), addMethods wraps it
up in a closure and never modifies the actual
Hi Robert,
That's a very interesting use case, thanks for that. I can certainly
see the utility of that, and in fact as I was writing all of this up
for my (pathetic little) blog I was getting increasingly uncomfortable
with the mixin issue.
If it's important for mixins to participate in
Hi Jim,
Perhaps I would do:
var B = Class.create(A, {
nifty: function(){
var $super = this.nifty.$super.bind( this );
// $super refers to A.nifty() bound to this
$super();
}
});
[1] Please correct if this is wrong!
You need to leave out the this. and use a named
Hi,
It really looks nicer :)
Thanks!
I haven't run it but I guest it is possible to do
this.method.$super.call(this, ...)
No, you need to drop the this. from the beginning of that. See my
reply to Allen a couple up (or the PDoc comments here[1]) for why.
Quadling rquadl...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/9/8 T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com:
Hi,
It really looks nicer :)
Thanks!
I haven't run it but I guest it is possible to do
this.method.$super.call(this, ...)
No, you need to drop the this. from the beginning of that. See my
my stuff into it:
git pull tjcrowder supercalls
5. Build
rake dist
6. Profit!
Alternately, here's[1] a pre-baked copy for anyone who just wants to
grab it and play around, but of course it will go stale fairly
quickly.
[1] http://gist.github.com/182838
-- T.J.
On Sep 8, 1:15 pm, T.J
use frequently.
Kudos, T.J.
-joe t.
On Sep 7, 6:54 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi all,
As some of you know, I'm running through all of our old docs and
merging them into the PDoc comments in the source, and I've run into a
really common theme: Where methods
@Allen,
For your two suggested additions. I don't think I have ever had a use for
either.
Thanks.
One thing I would like to suggest though is that Class.create
take an object or a function as an argument.
I _really_ like that idea, not least because it seems to me that by
reducing the
() { ... }
function keen() { ... }
// Export public methods
return {nifty: nifty, spiffy: spiffy, keen: keen};
});
...while still accepting the form where we've already been given an
object.
Nice one!
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
for jumping into this,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On Sep 8, 4:11 pm, Robert Kieffer bro...@gmail.com wrote:
I still have some serious reservations about this patch.
Before I dive into details, though, can someone please tell me why
we're not looking at Dean
and bound functions, though, and
I'm glad to hear that will be finding its way into 1.6.1.
-- T.J. :-)
On Sep 8, 7:43 pm, Robert Kieffer bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 8, 8:44 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
arguments.callee.$super.call(this, arg
.
Why? (Brief) examples are a good thing in documentation!
I'm restoring most of them, adjusting some to be a little more clear,
but somebody tell me if there's some strong reason for stripping them
out.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
end up endlessly recursing. Wow that's an easy trap to fall into.
No, it's either use the function's name unadorned, or use
arguments.callee and pay the performance penalty. Personally, I
prefer using the function's name. :-)
-- T.J. :-)
On Sep 6, 8:48 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com
developers).
Both of those are things that have not been done enough in the past
and have held back progress, hence trying to move move toward them.
As a Prototype user, thank you again for your efforts at improving
efficiency, greatly appreciated,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
://api.prototypejg.org up and running soon.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On Sep 6, 9:35 pm, joneff jon...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it just me, or the usability of the new API micro site isn't as
good as the old one?
I mean before, if I wanted to know more about Event
I would expect most
class authors to use, the benefit is less but still marked.
Call overhead isn't sexy, but does anyone else think this is worth
looking at more closely?
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
@Allen @Jim,
Gets my vote.
-- T.J. :-)
On Sep 4, 3:05 pm, Jim Higson j...@wikizzle.org wrote:
On Friday 04 September 2009 14:09:32 T.J. Crowder wrote:
[...] I do _not_ mean that I
think callSuper is a great name; I don't and I expect suggestions
like yours to result in a better name
, and that lead to my finding wild differences in a very
simple operation (zero-filling an array) across implementations.
FWIW,
[1]
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1295584/most-efficient-way-to-create-a-zero-filled-javascript-array/1295671
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
of the great things about the
new mechanism is that you don't have to copy args at all if you are
willing to use the more verbose syntax.
[1]
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core/browse_thread/thread/cf8c287e231a0192#
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On Sep 4
Hi Richard,
Yeah, see the PDoc mailing list[1]. Maruku is a no-go, too. :-
( Tobie's getting very frustrated (as am I).
[1] http://groups.google.com/group/pdoc?lnk=
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On Sep 4, 4:59 pm, Richard Quadling rquadl
and sharing it 'round; I'll do that
over the weekend.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On Sep 4, 6:25 pm, kangax kan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 4, 8:15 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've come up with a new way of handling $super
-scriptaculous/browse_thread/thread/e5286fee9ac18a40
Happy coding,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On Aug 27, 5:36 pm, watermark86 watermar...@gmail.com wrote:
I posted this code on the support list, but now that it's working, it
seems more appropriate to put
://github.com/tjcrowder/prototype/commit/29b76e7a9e9c6168d62f1d1c6da9aafb1bf5086f
FWIW,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Aug 26, 12:28 am, Samuel Lebeau samuel.leb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've been working on a Template rewrite trying to reduce code size and
complexity.
It uses
trying to make it fit in, and make it
as cool as the idea warrants.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Aug 26, 3:33 am, Samuel Lebeau samuel.leb...@gmail.com wrote:
Joe,
Callback function receives PE instance as first argument, so here
would be the self-stop mechanism
Samuel,
Sorry for the Simon error in my last post. Years ago I knew a guy
named Simon Lebeau, clearly it got ingrained my brain.
-- T.J. :-)
On Aug 27, 10:35 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
Funny you should be doing that, I was just looking at Template the
other
Hi Richard,
This may be a topic better discussed in the general discussion group
[1]. This group is for Prototype core development discussion.
[1] http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Aug 27, 10:12 am, Richard Heyes richard.he
of timeframe, but we're
talking hours or days, not weeks.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Aug 27, 11:43 am, Richard Quadling rquadl...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi.
I've just updated my local copy of prototype from git.
All looks OK.
Rebuilt prototype.js all fine.
Run rake doc
Hi,
This group is for discussion of development of the Prototype library,
not usage of it. Please see this group[1].
[1] http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Aug 27, 1:01 pm, clicforw...@googlemail.com
clicforw
@Allen, Alexander, Rainer,
Again, can we please pick this up over on the appropriate group[1]?
[1] http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous
Cheers,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Aug 27, 2:50 pm, Rainer Weber clicforw...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
thanks
Hi all,
See this fairly half-baked ticket in Lighthouse for context:
https://prototype.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8886/tickets/773
Responding to the proof-of-concept commit, Kangax asked whether * was
used for this sort of thing anywhere else, and in a private email
Tobie flagged up how this in
Hey Robert,
It's true, I was thinking in terms of deprecating PE at some
stage... :-)
Re #2: Using #bind at least doubles the call overhead, which I'm not a
fan of generally.
...have it throw $break!
Now that is a very smart idea.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Aug 27, 4:13
Exceptions aren't eaten.
Good, so a $break-like mechanism is possible then, just moved out a
level.
-- T.J.
On Aug 27, 10:49 pm, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com wrote:
*blech* to ES5's enumerable stuff not having $break or similar
functionality. I've just read the forEach section of
Cheers Allen.
-- T.J. :-)
On Aug 21, 7:49 pm, Allen Madsen bla...@gmail.com wrote:
I've looked it over and your description appears to be correct.
Allen Madsen
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:47 AM, T.J. Crowder
t...@crowdersoftware.comwrote:
Hi folks,
I fixed ticket #21 today
Hi folks,
I fixed ticket #21 today with this commit (my branch, not core):
http://github.com/tjcrowder/prototype/commit/47d82530fe3d8751e5c95d528bf324d2fb450666
I'd appreciate it if someone would look hard at the relevant if
statement in Form.serializeElements and check that their
Hi Richard,
For these really long listings and such, I wonder if it might be
better to use Pastie[1] rather than inlining them in messages?
(Pastie has a plain text choice.) It's just that with replies and
quoting and such, these messages get REALLY long and in some cases
they seem to freak out
line on the page, I get a 404 for language
\dollara.html.
Can anyone build the docs without having that problem? I just need to
know whether it's an issue with my setup.
Thanks,
-- T.J.
On Apr 3, 10:41 pm, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Thanks. With the latest
from the root Prototype directory. Those sound like issues I
had run into, and fixed, several weeks ago.
Meanwhile, I'll fire up my Windows VM and see what happens when I try
to generate docs from there.
Cheers,
Andrew
On Apr 2, 6:17 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi
on Windows. I also know nothing about Ruby, but I suspect
that it does as well.
-- T.J.
On Apr 3, 1:37 pm, Richard Quadling rquadl...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/4/3 T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com:
Hi Andrew,
T.J., are you sure you're running the latest code?
Yup, for the Ubuntu system
, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for the help. Yeah, it is weird, isn't it? :-) And yet we
have permission to delete it (apparently, as it does get deleted).
Are you logged in as an administrator?
I am indeed, and that file is being created in the temp
? I wonder if this has only been
used successfully on Windows (if even there?), Mac OS X, and the like
that don't (by default) have case-sensitive file systems...
-- T.J.
On Apr 2, 10:08 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Folks,
Can anyone build the docs other than Tobie and Andrew
wouldn't want to explain the subtle effects
of that to confused users. :-)
Again, FWIW,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
Independent Software Engineer, consulting services available
On Mar 29, 9:05 am, Yaffle vic99...@yandex.ru wrote:
Should I use defer method for browsers, which
Thanks in advance,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype: Core group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe
://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core/browse_thread/thread/16d0517ecc605a00/c9cfe041c1da19de
FWIW,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Mar 25, 12:32 pm, Robert Kieffer bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 24, 3:32 pm, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, a number
Wes,
Please use the general Prototype script.aculo.us discussion group[1]
for general discussion; this list is for core development discussion
only.
[1] http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous
Thanks,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
Independent Software Engineer
(Yes, I do have JavaScript allowed to do anything it wants with the
window.)
* Refuses to test against Safari 3.2.2, says it's not supported on
Windows
[1] http://prototypejs.org/download
FWIW,
-- T.J. :-)
On Mar 20, 8:59 pm, kangax kan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 20, 3:03 pm, T.J. Crowder t
at it or give me an idea where I
may have gone astray?
Thanks in advance,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
Independent Software Engineer, consulting services available
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
unittest_js submodules.
Let me know how things go.
Best,
Tobie
On Mar 20, 10:39 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi all,
I don't seem to be seeing the unit test HTML files. Apologies if I've
done something daft, but I'm running out the door so I thought I'd
ping
.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Nov 18, 5:56 am, Andrew Dupont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm thinking about how we can flatten the learning curve. If you were
to teach someone how to use Prototype in 10 incremental steps, what
would they be?
I've got only nine so far, but here
name. (ECMA spec[1], section 13.)
[1] http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-262.htm
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Nov 15, 7:43 am, artemy tregubenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:59:07 +0300, kangax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My only
what's going on.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype: Core group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
Hi,
You'll want to post to the user's group:
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous
This groups is for core development discussion, not end user
questions.
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Nov 11, 10:26 am, cleriker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
i
}
...to avoid the HTML parser ending the script early.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Nov 9, 5:33 am, kangax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 8, 6:14 am, T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yaffle,
(Just FWIW, I sense you're not a native English speaker, so I'll just
mention
-standard behavior not
implemented by other browsers (IE and Safari, for instance).
[1] http://www.prototypejs.org/contribute
[2] http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-262.htm
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Nov 8, 7:04 am, Yaffle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
var
which elements within the
element being replaced are being watched, you might look at event
delegation instead, which involves fewer handlers placed at a higher
(e.g., container) level.
FWIW,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Oct 30, 7:57 am, Yee Keat Phuah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Looks like Firefox already has it:
https://developer.mozilla.org/En/DOM_Events
Googling DOMNodeRemovedFromDocument site:microsoft.com brings no
joy, however. :-)
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Oct 30, 9:02 am, T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
FWIW, I don't think
may
differ. :-)
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Oct 30, 9:41 am, Yee Keat Phuah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 5:02 PM, T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, I don't think this is a bug in Prototype. Prototype keeps track
of the event handlers
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
