Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta mags

Geoff Wicks wrote: People who went to the sorting centre - one of the biggest in the Midlands - to collect their post were told that was impossible - "It's chaos in there. We wouldn't know where to look." I can fully understand that - so they should make that the official reason and TELL people

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta mags

-- From: "Dilwyn Jones" Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 5:10 PM To: Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta mags 1> I'm trying to build up some form of picture as to where in the UK there are outstanding mail delivery problems, or is it

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta mags

Op Thu, 30 Dec 2010 18:10:30 +0100 schreef Dilwyn Jones : I'd be interested in finding out who hasn't yet received their PRINTED Quanta magazine. My Quanta Magazine arrived in Amsterdam (south-east of Chester) just before Christmas. QL Today took till the 29th to find its way past postal

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta mags

As I now have mail for half my street I'd better become a postman for the day... if I've got post for half the street, who's got the other half of my mail??? G. It was Per the Norwegian who ate the reindeer, honest...I only wrote the Santa game... (there, back on topic). As to that, you ha

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta mags

Dilwyn Jones wrote: <> As I now have mail for half my street I'd better become a postman for the day... if I've got post for half the street, who's got the other half of my mail??? G. It was Per the Norwegian who ate the reindeer, honest...I only wrote the Santa game... (there, back on topi

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta mags

On 31/12/2010 09:27, Tony Firshman wrote: QL-MyLink-DT wrote, on 30/Dec/10 20:50 | Dec30: I know.. I know... Dilwyn said "hasn't"! But, as I'm John in Wales and West of Chester. I report that I recieved my QUANTA yesterday (Wednesday), bearing an 'audit trail' - Manchester 07.08 pm. etc.

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta mags

On 30 Dec 2010, at 20:50, QL-MyLink-DT wrote: > I know.. I know... Dilwyn said "hasn't"! > > But, as I'm John in Wales and West of Chester. > > I report that I recieved my QUANTA yesterday (Wednesday), bearing an 'audit > trail' - > > Manchester 07.08 pm. etc. etc. On which date? aaah...

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta mags

John in Wales wrote:> I know.. I know... Dilwyn said "hasn't"! But, as I'm John in Wales and West of Chester. I report that I recieved my QUANTA yesterday (Wednesday), bearing an 'audit trail' - Manchester 07.08 pm. etc. etc. On which date? aaah... that's far too smudged to read - even w

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta mags

Tony Firshman wrote: QL-MyLink-DT wrote, on 30/Dec/10 20:50 | Dec30: I know.. I know... Dilwyn said "hasn't"! But, as I'm John in Wales and West of Chester. I report that I recieved my QUANTA yesterday (Wednesday), bearing an 'audit trail' - Manchester 07.08 pm. etc. etc. On which date

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta mags

QL-MyLink-DT wrote, on 30/Dec/10 20:50 | Dec30: I know.. I know... Dilwyn said "hasn't"! But, as I'm John in Wales and West of Chester. I report that I recieved my QUANTA yesterday (Wednesday), bearing an 'audit trail' - Manchester 07.08 pm. etc. etc. On which date? aaah... that's far too

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta mags

Morning Dilwyn, On 30/12/10 17:10, Dilwyn Jones wrote: > I'd be interested in finding out who hasn't yet received their PRINTED > Quanta magazine. It's not just Quanta. My QL Today is still not in my sticky little hands! And I'm not really all that far from Chester! Cheers, Norman. -- Norman

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta mags

I know.. I know... Dilwyn said "hasn't"! But, as I'm John in Wales and West of Chester. I report that I recieved my QUANTA yesterday (Wednesday), bearing an 'audit trail' - Manchester 07.08 pm. etc. etc. On which date? aaah... that's far too smudged to read - even with a magnifier. Funny

[Ql-Users] Quanta mags

I'd be interested in finding out who hasn't yet received their PRINTED Quanta magazine. I appreciate that there are problems after the snow chaos, holiday days in lieu of the Christmas weekend etc etc, but I still find it ridiculous that items posted mid December haven't arrived here (e.g. pr

[Ql-Users] Quanta News

I'm currently gathering news for the next edition of Quanta magazine. If anyone has some QL-related news they'd like to put into Quanta magazine, please send it to me at either my personal email address or direct to news AT quanta DOT org DOT uk Thank you, Dilwyn Jones _

[Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine

The latest issue of QUANTA Magazine Vol 27 Iss 4 has also been posted today. Not such a bumper issue this time due to lack of content!! Sorry. No sign of QLToday yet in the UK. Regards, John Gilpin. ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival - continued

In message , Christopher Cave writes Hi Chris, Good ...Pleased to hear that you are still Meeting as a Group . :-) Malcolm knows very well that I am still alive, so perhaps he ought not to be quite so definite about the alleged demise of the Surrey group. Yes, we are reduced in numbers b

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival - continued

On 18 Jun 2010, at 19:32, Malcolm Cadman wrote: > > 5 - Scottish - George Gwilt's home. > Meet second Sunday of every month. > 12 times a Year ? Yes George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival - continued

Hi SQLUG meets every second Sunday in the month throughout the year. As we are a small group it is occasionally moved to suit the members. Visitors are welcome but please contact George Gwilt at 0131 445 1266 first. On Friday 18 June 2010 18:32, Malcolm Cadman wrote: > Hi, > > Following this up

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival - continued

On 18/06/2010 20:37, Dilwyn Jones wrote: Roy - I take it you want the Sussex group entry removed, then? Unless someone else has convened a group - yes. -- Roy Wood ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival - continued

Malcolm knows very well that I am still alive, so perhaps he ought not to be quite so definite about the alleged demise of the Surrey group. Yes, we are reduced in numbers but we do still meet about once a month on a Wednesday evening. We are coy about where since it depends on the generosity o

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival - continued

-- From: "Christopher Cave" Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 8:25 PM To: Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival - continued Malcolm knows very well that I am still alive, so perhaps he ought not to be quite so definite about t

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival - continued

-- From: "Malcolm Cadman" Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 7:32 PM To: Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival - continued 2 - Dorset - No described location. Meet on the second Sunday of every month, no cost indicated. 12 ti

[Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival - continued

Malcolm knows very well that I am still alive, so perhaps he ought not to be quite so definite about the alleged demise of the Surrey group. Yes, we are reduced in numbers but we do still meet about once a month on a Wednesday evening. We are coy about where since it depends on the generosity of a

[Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival - continued

Hi, Following this up. It is clear that the last two on this list - 7- Surrey and 8 - Sussex - no longer operate. Can anyone confirm the operation of numbers 1, 2, and 6 on the list ? As George contributes regularly to this list, he can confirm the details for number 5. 1 - West Midland

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival

In message , Geoff Wicks writes -- From: "Malcolm Cadman" Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 8:57 PM To: Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival Overall a good number of subgroups, yet two definitely meet at someone's

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival

Manchester is the largest of the subgroups and you have to touch your forelock when you meet them because they are also the Quanta toffs. (Quanta is shortly to be renamed the "External Affairs Branch of the North East Manchester QL User Group"). For a large group they are surprisingly silent ab

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival

-- From: "Malcolm Cadman" Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 8:57 PM To: Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival Overall a good number of subgroups, yet two definitely meet at someone's home, and three have no locati

[Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival

Hi, I have just read the article in the Quanta Magazine - Volume 27 - Issue 2 - Apr/May 2010 - on Page 9, entitled "Subgroup Support". My Group, the London QL & Quanta Group, has this Year applied for financial support from Quanta, and I am pleased to say we are receiving the maximum of £100

[Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine.

Hi all, Please note that as QUANTA are in the process of changing editors for the Magazine will you please send ALL contributions to:- editor AT quanta dot org dot uk This will ensure that your contributions get to the editor who is handling the current issue. Thanks, John Gilpin. _

[Ql-Users] Quanta News

I'll soon be compiling the Quanta news columns for our next issue. Once again, I would appeal to anyone with QL-related news they'd like to see in print to send it to me as soon as possible, ideally to the email address news AT quanta DOT org DOT uk Dilwyn Jones __

[Ql-Users] Quanta Constitution

Quanta members will now be receiving their AGM information and will note that no one is willing to stand for office as Treasurer. Once again it is repeated that John Gilpin has to stand down because of the six year rule. This is based on a misunderstanding of the Quanta constitution. Clause 5.

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

John / Quanta With the various feedback on this survey, will it be corrected, and data cleared down, so that we can start again. A link could then be added to the Quanta homepage, and an email shot to all of my QL customers. As it stands, I would feel foolish to refer people to it Rich Joh

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

It all seems thoroughly Quantesque, Still, if it will hardly matter if the results are published as widely as the last one. At 18:20 17/02/2010 +, you wrote: On Wednesday 17 Feb 2010 17:27:09 Derek Stewart wrote: > I selected option 1, which I took to be; I Strongly Agree > > I will be int

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

On Wednesday 17 Feb 2010 17:27:09 Derek Stewart wrote: > I selected option 1, which I took to be; I Strongly Agree > > I will be introducing the wrong information in the survey now. > > The Survey should of been proof read before being published. That was all my fault. When testing the survey I

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

I selected option 1, which I took to be; I Strongly Agree I will be introducing the wrong information in the survey now. The Survey should of been proof read before being published. Derek Tony Firshman wrote: gdgqler wrote: On 17 Feb 2010, at 16:17, Tony Firshman wrote: That combined with

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

gdgqler wrote: On 17 Feb 2010, at 16:17, Tony Firshman wrote: That combined with the invalid question that does not define 1-5 means I think that the survey will have to be started again I reckon. At least you can tell how many strong feelings there were. 3 = don't care. 1,5 = I str

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

On 17 Feb 2010, at 16:17, Tony Firshman wrote: > > That combined with the invalid question that does not define 1-5 means I > think that the survey will have to be started again I reckon. At least you can tell how many strong feelings there were. 3 = don't care. 1,5 = I strongly something. 2,

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

Bob Spelten wrote: Op Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:09:54 +0100 schreef John Gilpin : Looking through the list for the second time I could not find this item again and may have submitted the incomplete survey by mistake, so please ignore. How can they ignore it? They don't know which are *yours*. I

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

Op Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:09:54 +0100 schreef John Gilpin : Please spend a few minutes filling in the survey (no personal details are required) This will enable QUANTA to better support its members and the QL fraternity as a whole. Looking through the questionnaire a few new questions came up

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

On 17/02/2010 15:44, gdgqler wrote: On 16 Feb 2010, at 21:52, Derek Stewart wrote: Just done the Survey on my Ubuntu box, all seems to go fine. The only thing I could see wrong was the scale of 1-5 was missing, I selected 1 as strongly agree Hm!! I thought that 5 was strongly agree. Geor

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

On 16 Feb 2010, at 21:52, Derek Stewart wrote: > Just done the Survey on my Ubuntu box, all seems to go fine. > > The only thing I could see wrong was the scale of 1-5 was missing, I selected > 1 as strongly agree > Hm!! I thought that 5 was strongly agree. George __

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

Tony Firshman wrote: Derek Stewart wrote: Just done the Survey on my Ubuntu box, all seems to go fine. The only thing I could see wrong was the scale of 1-5 was missing, I selected 1 as strongly agree Exactly why the answers to this question are not usable. I took '1' as strongly disagree!

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

Derek Stewart wrote: Just done the Survey on my Ubuntu box, all seems to go fine. The only thing I could see wrong was the scale of 1-5 was missing, I selected 1 as strongly agree Exactly why the answers to this question are not usable. I took '1' as strongly disagree! Also as the survey do

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

Just done the Survey on my Ubuntu box, all seems to go fine. The only thing I could see wrong was the scale of 1-5 was missing, I selected 1 as strongly agree Derek Tony Firshman wrote: John Gilpin wrote: This is a World Wide call to ALL QLers QUANTA has just made its 2010 Survey live at:-

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

John Gilpin wrote: This is a World Wide call to ALL QLers QUANTA has just made its 2010 Survey live at:- http://quanta.nikad.net//index.php?sid=88977&lang=en Please spend a few minutes filling in the survey (no personal details are requ

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

Not sure what the 4 questions are at the bottom of the second page - Qjump / Sandy / Datel ? -- Rich Mellor RWAP Services I think this was meant to imply 'any other hardware by these companies not covered elsewhere in this question' Pity really, the question ended up with some specifics (e.g.

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

John Gilpin wrote: This is a World Wide call to ALL QLers QUANTA has just made its 2010 Survey live at:- http://quanta.nikad.net//index.php?sid=88977&lang=en Please spend a few minutes filling in the survey (no personal details are requ

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

John Gilpin wrote: This is a World Wide call to ALL QLers QUANTA has just made its 2010 Survey live at:- http://quanta.nikad.net//index.php?sid=88977&lang=en Please spend a few minutes filling in the survey (no personal details are requ

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

On 16 Feb 2010, at 15:09, John Gilpin wrote: > > Please spend a few minutes filling in the survey (no personal details are > required) > In the middle of completion I was told index.php could not be found! Help. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List htt

[Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

This is a World Wide call to ALL QLers QUANTA has just made its 2010 Survey live at:- http://quanta.nikad.net//index.php?sid=88977&lang=en Please spend a few minutes filling in the survey (no personal details are required) This will e

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA email failures -SPF check

I said here, some few days ago - "Thank you Rich for - .. The error appears to be related to the way in which the Quanta server validates email to try to stop SPAM. " .. "We're not quanTa for nowt - so I'll have another go, starting from scr

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA email failures -SPF check

Thank you Rich, John and Adam. We're not quaTa for nowt - so I'll have another go, starting from scratch, sometime soon. Will report back! Blasted Tiscali! or is it Tiscli?! ;-) {LatelyI, asked an Italian- in the supermarket & lost a 'bet'!} Apologies to those many articulate friends

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA email failures

Hi all, especially John in Wales, Adam has checked out the query sent in earlier today and this is his response:- = Having had a chance to check the logs and find john's message then read Rich's reply he is ultimately cor

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA related e-mail problem

Thank you Rich for - ".. The error appears to be related to the way in which the Quanta server validates email to try to stop SPAM. " But, thanks galore for - ". but as can be seen by John's experience, it also puts ***perfectly normal*** people off!!" {emphasis mine

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA related e-mail problem

The error appears to be related to the way in which the Quanta server validates email to try to stop SPAM. Basically, what John received was a challenge from the server, asking him to confirm his email address as valid, by sending an email to: allow-rtkxx-84.234.17@playerofgames.net This

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA related e-mail problem

Hi, John in Wales, You have, inadvertently, reached ALL the committee members from QUANTA by sending your query through the ql-users list. This is because ALL the committee subscribe to the list on their QUANTA default addresses (such as treasu...@quanta.org.uk etc.) I am sorry that you have h

[Ql-Users] QUANTA related e-mail problem

Good day! Sorry, even this cut and paste abstract below is a bit long, but, if you are a QUANTA subscriber please read on . Below is taken from what I g0t (last week) when I sent a mail to - 'anyone'@quanta etc i.e. Editor, Librarian, Web Admin. It's all a puzzle to me and,

[Ql-Users] QUANTA AGM.

Hi everyone, The adverse weather conditions have prevented us from finalising arrangements for the QUANTA AGM and Workshop for April this year. However arrangements are in hand and the latest information we have is as follows: QUANTA ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING 2010 AND WORKSHOP Date: Sunday 18th

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta News

Dilwyn Jones wrote: I can't believe that two months have flown by already, but we are at the deadline for news and articles for Quanta magazine (usually the 5th of the even-numbered months). If anyone has any last minute news for inclusion in Quanta magazine, please send it to me over the nex

[Ql-Users] Quanta News

I can't believe that two months have flown by already, but we are at the deadline for news and articles for Quanta magazine (usually the 5th of the even-numbered months). If anyone has any last minute news for inclusion in Quanta magazine, please send it to me over the next few days via news A

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta news

Dear Dilwyn You may like to receive the SQLUG magazine It will tell you what is happenning inSQLUG and there is part of anarticle each month. £4.00 Subscription will get you all this years issues. John On Thursday 06 August 2009 12:32, Dilwyn Jones wrote: > I'm in the process of putting togethe

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta news

Many thanks for your prompt and courteous reply Dilwyn - rest assured, I shall respect your privacy. Hope you and your family will be happy in your new home..   regards   albert   --- On Fri, 7/8/09, Dilwyn Jones wrote: From: Dilwyn Jones Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta news To: ql-us...@q-v

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta news

Oops, sorry, was meant to be a private reply, didn't spot it was a ql-users email. :-( Ah well, at least you all know my new address from 17th August now :-) -- Dilwyn Jones ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta news

... -- Dilwyn Jones New address from 17th August 2009: 22 Erw Las Coetmor New Road Bethesda Gwynedd LL57 3NN Email: dil...@evans1511.fsnet.co.uk Mobile: 07749 643922 - Original Message - From: "ALBERT NEWELL" To: Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 9:57 AM Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta n

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta news

have to hand which justify our conviction as to the soundness of our original choice.   Regards   albertN    --- On Thu, 6/8/09, Dilwyn Jones wrote: From: Dilwyn Jones Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta news To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Date: Thursday, 6 August, 2009, 1:32 PM I'm in the process of putti

[Ql-Users] Quanta news

I'm in the process of putting together the news column for Quanta magazine and would like to hear from anyone who has any QL-related news which could be included You are welcome to send the news either direct to my email address or to the Quanta address news AT quanta DOT org DOT uk -- Dilwyn

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1

t rather than the old Dot Matrix which is coming towards the end of its useful life - don't we all!?!? Cheers, John Gilpin. Joint QUANTA Editor. - Original Message - From: "Jochen Merz" To: Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 8:14 PM Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magaz

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1

Secondly, I am concerned about the damaged envelopes which some of you are getting. In order to minimise costs, I buy these envelopes in bulk, and it takes about 7 issues to use the quantity. It may be that the self sealing adhesive dries out during this period as I have noticed that occasionally

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1

Hi John (Gilpin) Thanks for your work with QUANTA Re your: Please keep me informed of this problem over the next few issues - whether yours is damaged OR NOT (to get some idea of balance) - it may be worth asking the PO to investigate. My envelope

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1

John Gilpin wrote: Hi Everyone, Firstly, thank you to those readers of QUANTA Magazine who have said how much they have enjoyed the latest issues. I agree - best for a long time My envelope was tattered and torn along the bottom - just to be different! I have recently cancelled my standing

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1

its useful life - don't we all!?!? Cheers, John Gilpin. Joint QUANTA Editor. - Original Message - From: "Jochen Merz" To: Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 8:14 PM Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1 Hi Malcolm, I received the Friday 27th Fe

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1

Hi Malcolm, I received the Friday 27th February 2009 the Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1, for February / March 2009. I received it as well. Yes, well done - and I prefer to see the ads in "full page mode" again - excellent decision. And up-to-date :-) One other point. Is anyone else exper

[Ql-Users] Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1

Hi. I received the Friday 27th February 2009 the Quanta magazine Volume 26, Issue 1, for February / March 2009. Which means that it has now caught up on the gap that had unfortunately opened up with filling of the editorial position. Well done again to John Gilpin for getting this situation

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 6

d others for your kind comments. They are much appreciated. Regards, John Gilpin. QUANTA Joint Magazine Editor. - Original Message - From: "Malcolm Cadman" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 7:33 PM Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 6 Hi, I have

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 6

- Original Message - From: "Dilwyn Jones" To: "QL-Users list" Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 9:51 PM Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 6 Geoff Wicks wrote: Actually, in the months I've been on the committee I've start

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 6

On 4 Feb 2009, at 20:32, Dilwyn Jones wrote: I hope everyone will be able to appreciate that John Gilpin has done remarkable work with the magazine (he also holds two other committee posts!). I certainly agree. Well done. George ___ QL-Users Ma

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 6

Thank you - and others for your kind comments. They are much appreciated. Regards, John Gilpin. QUANTA Joint Magazine Editor. - Original Message - From: "Malcolm Cadman" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 7:33 PM Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 6

Geoff Wicks wrote: It still rankles me that, when Dilwyn resigned as editor of QL Today after 9 years of hard work, only one reader wrote to say thank you. What, for resigning, or for 9 years of work? ;-)) Actually, in the months I've been on the committee I've started to appreciate how much w

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 6

- Original Message - From: "Dilwyn Jones" To: "QL-Users list" Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 8:32 PM Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 6 I hope everyone will be able to appreciate that John Gilpin has done remarkable work with t

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 6

Also, the previous magazine was Volume 25, Issue 4, Aug/Sept/Oct 2008. Which suggests that an Issue 5 has been missed out. I know that with the delays in the magazine production this may be deliberate. Yet it will also confuse any collectors of the magazine in the future. Err, yes. John Gilpin

[Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 6

Hi, I have received today - 4th February 2009 - the Quanta magazine Volume 25, Issue 6, which covers Nov/Dec 2008/Jan 2009. It is a good read, so well done to everyone involved. However, I did notice that it arrived in a very battered envelope with an apology from the Post Office. I do not

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine

Evening Geoff, > PS Please forgive the levity of the email, but today is a very special > day. As a sign of respect to our two Scottish QL Today writers I had a > rather large wee dram with my haggis, tatties and neeps. Now, who could they be I wonder? Cheers, Norman. PS. Full of finest Scotch

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine

- Original Message - From: "John Gilpin" To: "ql-users" Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 11:41 PM Subject: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Even Geoff might have a few words to say but then it'll be 'Just Words'.{:-)) I don't think you w

[Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine

The QUANTA Magazine is almost back to its target dates with a bumper 52 Page issue for the November / December / January issue already at the printers. I hope to get it out before the end of the month by post with the Email version ready to go **NOW**. Our next issue promises to be something a

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 4

- Original Message - From: "Malcolm Cadman" To: Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 9:00 PM Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 4 Hi, I received my copy on 15th January 2009 of the Quanta magazine, Volume 25, Issue 4. Although late, due to Editorial is

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 4

- Original Message - From: "Dilwyn Jones" To: Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 9:12 PM Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 4 If you have opted to receive the Quanta magazine as a PDF via email, there is a roundabout way of extracting the listing

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 4

Malcolm Cadman wrote: This Issue also benefits from having few long program listings. Listings are OK if they are relatively short. However, both the short and the longer listings are prone to printing and transcription errors. So, better if supplied on a media of some type every now and again

[Ql-Users] Quanta magazine - Volume 25, Issue 4

Hi, I received my copy on 15th January 2009 of the Quanta magazine, Volume 25, Issue 4. Although late, due to Editorial issues. That have already been acknowledged. I must congratulate John Gilpin, the Editor, and the Contributors; for producing a very interesting Issue of the magazine. W

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Magazine (was Room Rates at Allesley Hotel)

- Original Message - From: "Geoff Wicks" To: Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 8:43 PM Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Magazine (was Room Rates at Allesley Hotel) Under the constitution volume 26 issue 1 has to be with members before 29th >March 2009 and you cannot

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Magazine (was Room Rates at Allesley Hotel)

- Original Message - From: "John Gilpin" To: "ql-users" Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:00 PM Subject: [Ql-Users] Room Rates at Allesley Hotel NOTE:- The long awaited August/September/October issue of QUANTA >Magazine will be delivered from the printers on Monday. This means th

Re: [Ql-Users] quanta website and membership question

urday, January 03, 2009 4:14 PM Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] quanta website and membership question By the way, I also get to this page it turns out by clicking on the Quanta Magazine on the left. Thanks, jim On 3-Jan-09, at 11:06 AM, matras...@aol.com wrote: HI Jim, have just been there and done

Re: [Ql-Users] quanta website and membership question

der to provide an easy, reliable service. Regards, John Gilpin. QUANTA Treasurer treasu...@quanta.org.uk - Original Message - From: "James Hunkins" To: Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 3:53 PM Subject: [Ql-Users] quanta website and membership question I have been reading the

Re: [Ql-Users] quanta website and membership question

Near top left of home page, there's a flashing icon to click on, which flashes between "Buy Now"/"Quanta"/"Join Quanta..." This flashing link can be clicked on. -- Dilwyn Jones - Original Message - From: "James Hunkins" To: Sent: Saturday

Re: [Ql-Users] quanta website and membership question

On 3 Jan 2009, at 15:53, James Hunkins wrote: Also, is there a way to check on one's current membership status? That's a very good question. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Re: [Ql-Users] quanta website and membership question

site to tell you of your subscription status. I checked mine by asking John Gilpin by email. Regards Duncan -Original Message- From: James Hunkins To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Sent: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 15:53 Subject: [Ql-Users] quanta website and membership question I have been rea

Re: [Ql-Users] quanta website and membership question

..." There is nothing on the site to tell you of your subscription status. I checked mine by asking John Gilpin by email. Regards Duncan -Original Message- From: James Hunkins To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Sent: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 15:53 Subject: [Ql-Users] quanta website and membership que

Re: [Ql-Users] quanta website and membership question

To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Sent: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 15:53 Subject: [Ql-Users] quanta website and membership question I have been reading the emails about renewing on the website so I took a look (haven't been on the Quanta site for a while).? ? Where do you find the membership renewal o

[Ql-Users] quanta website and membership question

I have been reading the emails about renewing on the website so I took a look (haven't been on the Quanta site for a while). Where do you find the membership renewal on it - I could not find it (either I am blind which is possible some days or it needs a more obvious pointer for people to f

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Gilpin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes Hi John, Thanks for the message, and good luck in keeping the Quanta Magazine together. Your personal effort is recognised and appreciated. In an effort to avoid any erroneous "Grapevine" comments causing concern to QU

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine

seriously undermanned committee. Best Wishes, Geoff - Original Message - From: "John Gilpin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ql-users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 1:01 PM Subject: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine In an effort to avoid an

<    1   2   3   >