Gabriel,
There is no support for Debian based distributions.
Good Luck,
Erik
On 2/9/07, Gabriel Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Have anyone tried installation on Ubuntu? I would like to use this distro
for QT, as Centos nor FC works on my machine, due to hardware
incompatibility.
I dont get what your asking.
If your colo provider is allowing you to run dns for your ip
addresses, and you own a domain wehre is the problem.
Simply set A records, and PTR records that match. Viola.
Erik
On 2/10/07, Mark Samples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all -
Long time no speak...
I
Nah,
Static IP's are better for mail servers. Especially when you take
DomainKeys, spf, and other things into account that require knowing
the source.
Erik
On 2/10/07, Vince Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running several servers on dynamic IP's. The reverse DNS is not
important for
I've had great luck with xname.org and granitecanyon.com.
Erik
On 2/10/07, Mark Samples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vince Callaway wrote:
I'm running several servers on dynamic IP's. The reverse DNS is not
important for those.
Your upstream provider should be able to provide you with a mail
domains, running under one IP, multiple PTR records pointed at
the same IP.
Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
I dont get what your asking.
If your colo provider is allowing you to run dns for your ip
addresses, and you own a domain wehre is the problem.
Simply set A records, and PTR records
Testing. Noticed no qmailtoaster e-mail at all and wondering if either
people aren't having issues or if the list is having issues.
Erik
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
Good enough for me.
On 2/12/07, South Computers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup.
Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
Testing. Noticed no qmailtoaster e-mail at all and wondering if either
people aren't having issues or if the list is having issues.
Erik
Hey ES,
Can you put the DKVERIFY options you recommend in the bug tracker as a
feature request for a new default?
I want to ensure that this is tracked and becomes the new default, so
as to keep people from losing important mail.
Thanks,
Erik
On 2/12/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like you may be missing either a repo or the fedora project
goofed on a package release.
Erik
On 2/12/07, Gabriel Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was doing dependecy check with QT FC script.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa | grep selinux
selinux-policy-2.3.18-10
Hello Fajar,
I assume that you've configuredthe outlook squirrelmail similar to the
configuration included in the squirrelmail-toaster package. If so,
things should just be created automatically.
Perhaps you left out the following options
$trash_folder = 'Trash';
$sent_folder
Claudio,
The QmailToaster behavior is to treat one outgoing messages as one
outgoing message, regardless of how many recipients. If one fails, the
entire message fails.
Erik
On 2/13/07, Claudio Mundin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good Morning ,
When i send a mail with differens rcpt address and
Hey ES,
EE/Nick,
Is there some reason the toaster doesn't do things the standard way?
I've been wondering what the empty /service directory was all about. ;)
To call anything that DJB does standard is a misnomer. That said, we
put everything in /var/qmail/supervise to make it easier to backup
As long as there's 'svc' to control it, I see no need for putting links into
/service/. For that matter, why is there a /service/ at all in the toaster?
I'd be inclined to ditch it.
Probably there since the Miguel Beccari days and hasn't been removed.
You can rmdir it without side effect.
If
arent passed through ..
How would you set MAXPERIP to your desired value ?
Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
Hey Philip,
Could you clarify what you're asking or saying?
Erik
On 2/13/07, Philip Nix Guru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I ll get more attention now than when every1 is waking up
Indeed. You can put that in rc.local.
Erik
On 2/13/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
As long as there's 'svc' to control it, I see no need for putting
links into
/service/. For that matter, why is there a /service/ at all in the
toaster?
I'd be inclined
Submit it to the bug tracker as a feature request. It'll probably be
included once the next distro is added.
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/flyspray
Erik
On 2/14/07, Quinn Comendant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI: a patch for autorespond to prevent spam from getting a reply. I would
recommend
It's probable you didn't setup forwarders in your localhost dns server.
Erik
On 2/14/07, 24x7server [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dear friends
the issue of slow smtp session is resolved. outgoing emails are really flying
...
solution -- We changed the sequence of ip addresses in resolv.conf
Internet, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Erik A. Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 10:36 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SLOW SMTP SESSION - RESOLVED
It's probable you didn't setup forwarders in your
The only problem I can anticipate are MySQL related.
RH7.3 is very old and the MySQL format changed a bit since then.
Erik
On 2/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings All,
I'm wondering about compatibility issues between my older semi-toaster
qmail install on RH 7.3 from
You may be better off migrating to CentOS 3. It'll be supported for a
while and comes with MySQL 3.23.5x
Erik
On 2/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
RH7.3 is very old and the MySQL format changed a bit since then.
Hmm. The mysql
was, my SMTP sessions went
from 40+sec to open connection, to 2-3 seconds!!!
I just left -r bl.spamcop.net in there, and it works just fine now!
Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
Right. It's why I recommend that people use dns forwarders in their
caching name servers configuration.
Erik
On 2/15/07
The error is that the DomainKey signature failed.
You're not publishing the public key in DNS.
Thanks,
Erik
On 2/16/07, Diego Pivetta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Olá list
I have implement domain key on my server i using rthis tutorial
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Domainkeys
On my
I just read an archived message on this (from you) -- is it one package
or two which need to be built with 'spambox 1' ?
Sounds like qmailadmin only ... ?
Correct, qmailadmin only.
Yes it will. And yes, all you see is the spam detection box for right
now. The first time that user gets a
By the way that's a funny domain. Phonetically it sounds very similar
to Verizon Broadband.
Erik
On 2/19/07, Michael H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
Make sure you set a quota. Leaving the quota blank breaks the current
mailfilter script. It is why we don't enable
What's the problem?
On 2/19/07, Paulo Sousa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Anyone can help me?
Regards
-
Paulo Sousa wrote:
Eric,
I've jump out the company own's the domain.
And i want to continue have my email's accounts.
The other email account
a user on one, you make an alias on the other.
On 2/19/07, Paulo Sousa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
How can i split a email domain ?
Have 5 users in a MX server and the other users in other MX server.
Regards
Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
What's the problem?
On 2/19/07, Paulo Sousa [EMAIL
Old MTA Survey:
http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/man.200611/mxsurvey.html
New Survey:
http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/man.200701/mxsurvey.html
Looks like we've gained over a hundred servers since December 2006.
Not bad at all!
Erik
ClamAV upgrades should always take place as follows:
rpmbuild --rebuild --with $DIST clamav-new.src.rpm
rpm -e --nodeps clamav-toaster
rpm -Uhv /path/to/clamav-new.$ARCH.rpm
service qmail cdb
I am looking to make this work with rpm -Uhv, but currently this is
the procedure.
As far as 0.90rc2
Indeed.
On 2/22/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would clamav-toaster-0.88.7-1.3.7 need to be removed, or only *rc* versions?
Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
ClamAV upgrades should always take place as follows:
rpmbuild --rebuild --with $DIST clamav-new.src.rpm
rpm -e --nodeps clamav
Obsoletes wouldn't do it. I think the correct thing would be setting the Epoch.
Erik
On 2/22/07, Scott Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 22 February 2007, Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
ClamAV upgrades should always take place as follows:
rpmbuild --rebuild --with $DIST clamav
Did you run service qmail cdb?
Erik
On 2/22/07, Peter Peltonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/22/07, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ClamAV upgrades should always take place as follows:
I just did the actual upgrade, restarted all services but I still see
this in my Received headers
On 2/22/07, Peter Peltonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/22/07, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you run service qmail cdb?
No I did not, that did the trick, thanks! I thought that it was only
required if one does changes in
/etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp.cdb
/var/qmail/control
Might be a neat one for the faq.
Erik
On 2/23/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just posting this for posterity.
CentOS4.4.
You get this error when upgrading zlib if selinux is enabled. (DOH!)
In /etc/selinux/config,
SELINUX=disabled
then reboot.
--
-Eric 'shubes'
Doesn't your upgrade script follow the order from the main site?
On 2/23/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I use qtp-newmodel for a new install, I get the following.
I'm wondering, why does clamav-toaster install so soon? Shouldn't it install
some time after qmail (at least)? Is the
Greetings,
I have released a couple of packages on the devel site.
Full ChangeLog on the site: http://devel.qmailtoaster.com
Thanks,
Erik
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
Gmail is already supporting it.
Wish we could get a look at their code base, as the whole thing is
based on Qmail.
Erik
On 2/27/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, I see that DKIM was approved last Wednesday.
http://dkim.org/
Alexey, are you still with us?
--
-Eric 'shubes'
Hi David,
1 .- Is clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 compatible with simscan-toaster-1.2-1.3.1
Not 100% sure. I'd recommend upgrading simscan
2 .- Is documentation of implementing the new SRS on the toaster available
somewhere? (an step by step guide will be cool)
Greetings,
I have released a new qmail-toaster package on the devel site. Special
thanks to Jean-Paul and Nick.
Download available from http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/
Thanks,
Erik
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted
Greetings,
A new devel package has been released on the devel site for download.
I believe this contains the fix for the clamav high load problem that
has affected a small minority.
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/
Thanks,
Erik
Hi Ho
This is a new version of Clamav and New release of the toaster.
Correct
Is the updating procedure same as before?
Yes
I am using the previous version of toaster, any other toaster package
need to update before using this Clamav toaster?
Possibly simscan. I don't believe anything
Greetings,
I have released a new simscan-toaster package. This is not a necessary
update as only a few defaults were changed.
1) Disabled RBL Checks on localhost
2) Put saner defaults on DKVERIFY (DEfhIJK)
This is available for download at http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/
Thanks,
Erik
There is no cnt44 flag, use cnt40
CentOS 4.3 guide should work perfectly for CentOS 4.4, I have done
this many times.
Check to see if you have postfix installed.
On 3/3/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Haison Company wrote:
Hi List,
My Server run on Cent OS 4.4. I follow exactly
make sure that you also apply the qmail-bigdns patch or
you will get random lookup failues.
Don't know what the linefeed patch does though.
On 3/3/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
Greetings,
I have released a new qmail-toaster package on the devel site. Special
It's in the ChangeLog. I asked in #clamav on freenode and they said
the high load problem was fixed. That was good enough for me. :)
Erik
On 3/3/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
Greetings,
A new devel package has been released on the devel site for download
I'll try.
On 3/3/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
Greetings,
I have released a new qmail-toaster package on the devel site. Special
thanks to Jean-Paul and Nick.
Download available from http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/
Thanks,
Erik
EE,
Really appreciate
yum -y install libtool-ltdl-devel
Try again.
On 3/4/07, KP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] vpopmail error
KP wrote:
Hi Nick
Use SMTP_AUTH.
On 3/4/07, Terry Rigby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to setup my mail server to allow me to send email from anywhere
outside my network. With my older qmail install I used pop before smtp but
since I am now using IMAP I'm not sure how I'd go about this. I've read on
how
the originating IP to rblsmtpd and gets denied. Is there something I need to
set up on the server? I'm not sure what I am doing wrong exactly.
- Original Message -
From: Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 1:20 PM
Subject
,
Carlos
Em Domingo 04 Março 2007 19:12, Erik A. Espinoza escreveu:
Use SMTP Auth on port 587 w/ TLS
Erik
On 3/4/07, Terry Rigby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using outlook, if I choose to not use smtp auth the mail gets denied
because the server wont relay it. When I turn smtp auth
Greetings,
Because all of the packages, other than qmail-toaster, on the devel
site were such minor changes, I am planning on fasttracking those
packages to the main site on Monday. (Not qmail-toaster-*.src.rpm)
If anyone has any objections please reply, otherwise this will be done.
Thanks,
Thank Jean-Paul and Nick. I just tested it and put on my web server.
On 3/5/07, Warren (mailing lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bigdns patch! Woohoo! Thank you Erik. I cannot tell you the problems
this has caused me with AOHell.
W
Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
I'll try.
On 3/3/07, Eric Shubes
There is nothing sane we can do about that on the package end.
Erik
On 3/5/07, Peter Peltonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every time I upgrdae the qmailtoaster pkg (manually) my simcontrol
file is overrun. Is this
necessary? Same thing with tcp.smtp. Couldn't the new files just be
added with
It wasn't that hard. The hard work was done by the ClamAV group.
Erik
On 3/5/07, Peter Peltonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll mention at this thread too, that upgrading to
clamav-toaster-0.90.1-1.3.11 from the
devel site seemed to fix my problems.
Consider this long thread closed :) Thanks
Greetings,
Just a quick reminder that we have a bug tracker (and feature request)
on the devel site. Keep those reports coming, it's the feedback we
need to keep making this project better.
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/flyspray/
* NOTE: Not all feature requests are going to make it into the
PROTECTED] var]#
Any idea?
- Original Message -
From: Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 2:18 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] vpopmail error
yum -y install libtool-ltdl-devel
Try again.
On 3/4/07, KP [EMAIL PROTECTED
state
NEW,RELATED,ESTABLISHED
Any changes do I need to make in my iptables rules. you can try out with
http://59.162.130.62/webmail or http://www.linsoftindia.info/webmail with
user: demo and pass: demo123
KP
- Original Message -
From: Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED
installed fedora machine I am getting
localhost/143: Name or service not know.
Now how can I overcome this problem
KP
- Original Message -
From: Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 12:49 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] vpopmail
the outgoing msges sent from toaster box are going to the spam box. I
tried with Gmail and Yahoo.
Any solutions on this.???
- Original Message -
From: Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 1:30 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster
use qtprune.sh from the devel site, modify it for your needs.
Erik
On 3/5/07, Roxanne Sandesara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do realize it makes me a frightening newbie in the world of
mailserver administrators. But I really haven't been bothering much
with SpamAssassin built into Toaster. I've
No.
On 3/6/07, KP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Is there anyway by which we can add signatures to all the outgoing mails
from a QT box.
Rgrds
KP
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
Ensure you are using the latest version of the qmail-toaster rpm from
the devel site. It is very likely that at least some of the issues
relating to qmail-dk may be caused by the missing bigdns patch which
is now included.
Erik
On 3/7/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes.
Jason P
Are you sure you used 'rpmbuild --rebuild --with fdr40' to make this package.
Seems to me you're experiencing a build error.
Erik
On 3/7/07, Natalio Gatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello List:
I´m having a problem with a FC40 system. It builds correctly but when
I try to install it via RPM it
Greetings,
I have moved the following packages from devel to the main site:
simscan-toaster, isoqlog-toaster, clamav-toaster,
spamassassin-toaster, qmail-toaster
The ChangeLog is as follows:
simscan-toaster (Changed tcp.smtp defaults exempting rbl checks on
localhost, better defaults for
Hello Jason,
I know this has been mentioned many times before, but since we use
qmailtoaster as our primary corporate email server, I would like the option
of adding a disclaimer/footer at the end of any outgoing emails. Is this
possible with the current version? If not, could it be
This looks like a good avenue for a different branch, as we work
towards the future of the QmailToaster.
For the remainder of 1.3 and possibly 1.4, we'll probably be sticking
with the current methods.
On 3/7/07, David Sánchez Martín [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Qmail-SPP have a great community
rpm -qa | grep toaster
On 3/7/07, Jim Shupert, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Friends,
how to I see what version of Qmail toster I am running.
( i tried awhich qmail )
I find a file called VERSION
in var/qmail/doc
it reads:
netqmail 1.05
version end
I installed just a week or so
Use domain aliases.
/home/vpopmail/bin/vaddaliasdomain real_domain alias_domain
So pick a primary domain, and make the others as aliases. Might want
to brush up on the wiki and read up on some of this stuff . . .
Erik
On 3/8/07, Jim Shupert, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Friends,
I have a
Remember that spamc-user doesn't work per user per say, it works per
e-mail address.
That means if you have any aliases, those aliases will not be party to
any changes made.
For example, [EMAIL PROTECTED] w/ an alias of [EMAIL PROTECTED] If I
modify foo in mysql only, bar will still be stuck on
Looks like both work the same way, as they don't use the triplet.
Erik
On 3/9/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.V.Anthony wrote:
On this day, 01-February-2007 9:48 AM, Erik Espinoza wrote:
Very basic greylisting available here:
http://www.kabewm.com/?p=19
I recommend against
I want to create a qmail server to use Dovecot IMAP and Dspam.
Cool. Let me know how it goes.
With the case of Dovecot, I'd like to know if it is possible to
eliminate Courier IMAP from the compilation. Are there some other
dependencies on Courier that will cause the setup to fail and
any
interference.
Whatever happens I will give it a try and get back with the results.
On 3/10/07, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to create a qmail server to use Dovecot IMAP and Dspam.
Cool. Let me know how it goes.
With the case of Dovecot, I'd like to know
From what I have read it appears that vpopmail has to be configured with a
uid above 500 if it is to work with dspam.cgi. Will it simply be a matter of
changing the uid in the package spec to a figure above 500? There are a
number of uid 89s appearing in the package spec and I wonder if they all
Ensure that /var/qmail/control/locals is empty, or at least doesn't
contain users.
Erik
On 3/11/07, Frank Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have done a new qmail install and trying to deliver has this problem
400045f3a5832dd5d93c starting delivery 55: msg 769090 to local
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have you tested this with SRS enabled? I can imagine that this will
have serious issues when rewriting is being done.
On 3/12/07, AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
I've made this patch for 1.3.14 with support for Inter7's eMPF.
I've seen some discussion on the list but no patches.
So
Have you tweaked /var/qmail/supervise/imap*/run to allow more incoming
connections?
The default is 40, even if you edit the imap configs, as the imap
stuff doesn't run as a service it runs from tcpservers.
Erik
On 3/12/07, Simone Marzona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
I got a strange
machine with FC4.
On 3/9/07, Natalio Gatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/7/07, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you sure you used 'rpmbuild --rebuild --with fdr40' to make this
package.
Seems to me you're experiencing a build error.
Erik
Yes, I used the correct flag whe I
Try the latest qmail-toaster package, see if that works.
On 3/12/07, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Natalio,
I don't know what to tell you. FC4 is already retired by the Fedora
group, no new updates are coming out. If the prior versions installed
fine, it is very likely
I do not think I clearly understand what is going on. If you could do
a diagram and put it on a web server so that I understand the flow of
e-mail, I'd probably be able to help fairly quickly.
Erik
On 3/12/07, Brian Trudeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, well I went ahead and just registered
Blacklists shouldn't have a affect pop3 or imap.
1) Logs
2) Distro
3) qmailtoaster rpm versions
4) strace on pop3 failing
Anything else would be useful, such as recent changes or upgrades installed.
Erik
On 3/12/07, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
EP,
strace -p $PID
Get the pid of the pop3 daemon to see if we can get some logs.
Also have you tried stopping and restarting qmail? What does 'service
qmail stat' say?
Erik
On 3/12/07, Eric Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to confirm: The pop3 log was posted in my last email (before I
There is no daylight saving time patch for QmailToaster. CentOS needs
updating, but that is all.
Does pop3-ssl work while regulra pop3 fails?
Thanks,
Erik
On 3/12/07, Eric Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I've retried starting it a few times. When I stop the service, several
of the
Ask in the list.
On 3/12/07, John Jaiver Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hola erik espero me puedas ayudar. tengo un problema y ya he mirado bastante
y no me funciona todavia,
tengo qmail instalado qmail funciona perfectamente por la web, si
configuro un cliente externo me funciona
Ask in the list.
If you are getting a bounce when you send to the list, send me the
bounce and I will look into it.
For what it's worth, your mail did go through and someone already
posted a response.
Erik
On 3/12/07, manny mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi erik ,
Im trying to send
Could a few members of this list confirm that they got the original
post from dnk?
On 3/13/07, dnk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My own new posts were not going through (still have not seen my ones
form 2 days ago), yet I seem to be able to reply to previous posts.
Just testing if the first
You might have better luck with the spamassassin list. We do not
include support for that with the qmailtoaster, so you probably will
not get too many responses. That said, it looks like you are just
missing a few perl modules.
On 3/13/07, manny mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi to all ,
SpamAssassin shouldn't be scanning mail from IP's with RELAYCLIENT set
or SMTP-AUTH is used. Ensure that this is how mail is being sent from
within your domain. Also if you don't want [EMAIL PROTECTED],
enble spf and srs.
On 3/13/07, 24x7server [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
let us say i host :
More info is necessary. How bout distro, rpm versions, system stats,
and more context with the same email as seen from smtp and send logs.
On 3/13/07, Aldi Mmm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please help, when I do:
vi + /var/log/qmail/spamd/current
It shows:
[2612] warn: prefork: select returned -1!
qmail-dk is broken and is going to be disabled by default in the next
release of the qmail-toaster package.
Anatoly has done some great work on this, but it is just not production worthy.
To manually disable, just type the following:
# cd /var/qmail/bin ; rm -f qmail-queue ; ln -s
bad code to our qmail distribution in the
future.
On 3/14/07, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
qmail-dk is broken and is going to be disabled by default in the next
release of the qmail-toaster package.
Anatoly has done some great work on this, but it is just not production worthy
Hello Simone,
Not very many people use mysql on a remote machine. When you diverge
from the mainstream setup, it's hard to get support due to the fact
that most don't use it like you do.
Thanks,
Erik
On 3/14/07, Simone Marzona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No one can help me?
On Sat, 2007-02-24
Hello BB,
I use a Yahoo adress for this QMT email list. Before,
MOST emails were coming to my inbox but for 2 days
they ALL came to my BULK?!
Put the thing in your whitelist.
Also my old QMT SERVER is still sending to the same
Yahoo adress INBOX (Not Bulk), so did this email list
admin make
We will be waiting for FC7 to be released so that we can add CentOS 5
and FC7 at the same time. I believe around this time we will be
working on an experimental 1.4 branch that will be on the fast track
to becoming the stable. The changes between the final 1.3 and 1.4 will
mostly be to the
Hello,
I restored my toaster successfully from a server that had suffered
hardware failure, but since then outlook users have not been able to
send out mail. The error below is returned by the system almost
immediately the mail is sent. However my webmail users are happy. Any
pointer are welcome
http://www.qmailrocks.org/
On 3/19/07, Claudio Mundin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some body know how to work qmail in Debian??
Thank
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
Hello Phil,
Make sure you are using the latest clamav. Perhaps you are using
clamav 0.90 which contained some issues that caused mail to be lost.
Erik
On 3/20/07, Philip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey
getting worse and worse ..
On the 3 toatsers I got here
2 fc5
1 centos 4.4
All three have the
The error 451 is a soft reject.
There are two types of rejects in smtp, 4xx are temporary rejections
and should be retried and 5xx are permanent rejections.
Not sure what else you are looking for.
Erik
On 3/20/07, Justice London [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to get
ping!
On 3/20/07, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The error 451 is a soft reject.
There are two types of rejects in smtp, 4xx are temporary rejections
and should be retried and 5xx are permanent rejections.
Not sure what else you are looking for.
Erik
On 3/20/07, Justice London
PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 14:59 -0700, Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
ping!
On 3/20/07, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The error 451 is a soft reject.
There are two types of rejects in smtp, 4xx are temporary rejections
and should be retried and 5xx are permanent rejections
Yo ES,
I'd take sorbs out of the blacklist. It routinely blocks Gmail,
hotmail and various others big sites. On the site they recommend that
sorbs be used in scoring via spamassassin and not outright rejection.
Just a thought.
Erik
On 3/20/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You might
Stock today is zen.spamhaus.org.
Erik
On 3/20/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stock as in default 'factory' settings, which is sbl.spamhause.org.
You'll probably get much better rejection with the loose or moderate qtp
blacklists. See http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com/trac/#qtp-set-rbls
1 - 100 of 307 matches
Mail list logo
