On Jan 30, 2:18 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
Yep, I have been playing around with this and I don't think it will be
too far into the future.
I did play around with the script I wrote some more and the only code
using SSE3 or higher is
./libatlas.so: at least 863330 sse
On Jan 30, 5:46 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 5:44 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Jan 30, 2:18 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
Yep, I have been playing around with this and I don't think it will be
too far
On Jan 30, 6:01 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
Seriously: The energy spend on an SSE only build is plainly not worth
it considering the number of bugs I can fix in the same time where the
vast majority of Sage users benefit. Once #2999-#3001 is done we can
attempt to do
On Jan 31, 7:31 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 6:22 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
I just did extend my little script to also detect SSE2 instructions
and only in $SAGE_LOCAL/lib there are 43 static libs and 143 dynamic
libs which
On Jan 31, 7:40 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Elizabeth Yip el...@comcast.net wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion. It works !!!
Then I tried to rerun some of my old worksheets and had a problem with
plot3d. I got an empty gray rectangle, no
On Jan 30, 9:55 pm, john_perry_usm john.pe...@usm.edu wrote:
Hey, it turns out that you hit it on the money. While looking through
it again, I noticed that when examining the source through sage
(using ??) the source file was listed in the directory
On Jan 31, 1:09 pm, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi,
for Sage 3.3.alpha3 I got a strange build failure with the new
cddlib-094f.spkg on my Intel Core2Duo MacBook / Mac OS X 10.4.11,
XCode 2.5:
The make run (acually MAKE='make -j2' ) won't extract this spkg (see
log
On Jan 31, 1:20 pm, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com
wrote:
SNIP
P.S.:
There is another issue revealed by this build failure reported above.
I always run on the command line MAKE MAKE testlong so after some
hours/overnight/etc. the end result is there without further
On Feb 1, 4:23 pm, Tim Abbott tabb...@mit.edu wrote:
Hello all,
Hi Tim,
As of today, Sage 3.0.5 is available in Debian sid, so you can now run
apt-get install sagemath and get Sage installed on your Debian
system[1].
Excellent.
However, the sage package has bitrotted substantially
On Feb 1, 1:08 pm, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
SNIP
Pari seems rather inefficient when the above sparse matrix requires
more than 2GB Ram to compute. The sparse matrix code needs a good
cleanup anyway.
I agree, and I absolutely do not volunteer to do this.
On Feb 1, 1:26 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Maple's Linear Algebra is noted for not being particularly good at large
sizes. With symbolic entries, it's much worse. Thanks for these timings,
it just reinforces my idea that I should switch as soon as the calculus
Well, given the fact that we will likely soon ship SageTeX with Sage
itself is there any particular reason not to include Nick's code with
default Sage? Given the number of Sage dev using Emcas [which for the
record is canonically wrong since vim is the superior editor, but all
you Emacs users
On Feb 1, 9:21 pm, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 1, 4:44 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
Can you default it to LinBox in your case and report if LinBox causes
trouble either by throwing an error or by producing wrong results?
I don't think I can
On Feb 1, 9:19 pm, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1-Feb-09, at 8:33 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 6:56 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Well, given the fact that we will likely soon ship SageTeX with Sage
itself is there any particular
On Feb 2, 8:30 am, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2-Feb-09, at 6:12 AM, Martin Albrecht wrote:
On Monday 02 February 2009, Nick Alexander wrote:
(defun malb-inferior-sage-bindings ()
Install inferior-sage-mode bindings locally.
(interactive)
On Feb 2, 2:43 pm, dannychrastina danny.chrast...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 14, 4:04 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Jan 13, 10:13 pm, DavidS davidshi...@gmail.com wrote:
But further along the compilation, I got stuck here:
ld -opolybori/libpolybori-0.5.0.so.0.0.0 -shared
On Feb 2, 8:23 pm, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
On PPC OSX.4.11:
While building ntl-5.4.2.p5:
g++ -I../include -I. -O2 -g -fPIC -dynamiclib -undefined
dynamic_lookup -o libntl.dylib FFT.o FacVec.o GF2.o lots more
vec_ulong.o vec_vec_ulong.o
On Feb 2, 11:23 pm, Ivan Andrus g...@macmail.com wrote:
On Jan 30, 2009, at 8:47 AM, kcrisman wrote:
Hi Ivan,
Anyway, it sounds like what mabshoff really needs is just the best
tarball possible to then be able to drop a Sage build into for a fully
functional .app bundle
On Feb 3, 12:34 am, dannychrastina danny.chrast...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:13 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
* What binutils release are you running (i.e. ld --version)
GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.18.
I notice David (above) had the same problem using 2.19. Also
On Feb 3, 12:36 am, Alexander Dreyer
jan.alexander.dre...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Alexander,
Hi, Hi, I'm having the same error with 3.2.3 (on Gentoo x86_64). It seems
to me that this '-Wl,-soname,libpolybori-0.5.0.so.0' is in the form in
which options are given to the compiler in
On Feb 3, 4:53 am, dannychrastina danny.chrast...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Hi,
Ok, so I extracted the .spkg of polybori (having worked out that it
was just a bzipped tarball), changed SConstruct (with sonameprefix as
'-Wl,-soname -Wl,'), and repackaged it, and it didn't work:
ld -o
On Feb 3, 3:54 am, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, that is a side effect of not setting -fno-common. I am curious
which gcc release this is.
powerpc-apple-darwin8-gcc-4.0.1
Well, I am much more interested in gcc -v since the above can cover 3
or so XCode releases.
export
On Feb 3, 8:53 am, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I am much more interested in gcc -v since the above can cover 3
or so XCode releases.
Build 5370.
Thanks.
I ran testlong on that OSX 10.4/PPC and I am seeing one surprising
doctest failure
sage -t -long
it is only the bindings) or
also requiring an iterative license. A lot of things ended up in the
essential gap.spkg that these days would not even make it into Sage
without a lot of mandatory cleanup.
Does someone (William?, mabshoff?) want to explicitly state the proposal
we are voting
Ok, thanks to Ivan who did upload some patches to trac 3.3.alpha5 out
in a couple hours will create a Sage app if you run -bdist. Check out
a screenshot of it in action at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/SageApp.png
It is based on Sage 3.3.alpha0 since I did no feel like hosing
On Feb 3, 2:15 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com
wrote:
SNIP
Does someone (William?, mabshoff?) want to explicitly state the proposal
we are voting on?
PROPOSAL 1: When installing official Sage spkg's
On Feb 3, 2:09 pm, Tom Boothby tomas.boot...@gmail.com wrote:
I definitely think that a passive approach is better. Debian, for example,
has their repositories split into free and non-free. I believe that
this would be the best solution to this problem.
Click-through interactive
On Feb 3, 9:33 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Feb 3, 8:53 am, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I am much more interested in gcc -v since the above can cover 3
or so XCode releases.
Build 5370.
Thanks.
I ran testlong on that OSX 10.4/PPC and I am seeing one
On Feb 3, 5:36 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 12:19 AM, jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
William,
Could you (or Mike) review #5141 and #5143? #5141 is a one-line fix to make
sure that tinymce is disabled on published worksheets, while #5143
On Feb 3, 7:07 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
It was the only icon I could find in the (admittedly short) time I
looked. Where could I get the icon (as large as possible)? Also, if
you can tell me what to do with dropped files I could easily add
that. i.e. how does
On Feb 3, 7:16 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 7:12 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
would start a notebook server if it isn't already running, and once it
is, would call basically (1) above for the default sage notebook
server running from
Hi,
the sage websites have been getting a couple hundred hits today as
referrals from the above story. It all boils down to (as discussed in
IRC) that MMA now offers a personal edition of MMA for about $300 for
download in the US and Canada. But you can't do research with it
according to the
On Feb 4, 6:06 am, daveloeffler dave.loeff...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
I've been doing some tinkering with the congruence subgroups code
(because I'm lecturing a course on modular forms, and I think it's a
nice idea that Sage should be able to do all the questions on my
problem sheets).
On Feb 4, 7:46 am, dannychrastina danny.chrast...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Hi,
Hi Danny,
Athttp://www.triv.org.uk/~danny/sage/you should find the env dump
and the compressed install log.
3 seconds looking at the env dump did confirm my suspicion. You do
have the Intel C/C++ compiler in
, app bundle for OSX on bdist, TinyMCE polishing/fixes) and a also
fixed a couple doctests, so alpha5 is relatively small, but we need to
get it tested.
Source tarball, a sage.math binary a the upgrade package can all be
found in the usual place at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff
On Feb 3, 10:52 pm, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
Almost two years ago, Linbox's implementation of Smith normal form was
taken out of Sage because it was too buggy. After some work, I managed
to reinstate it, hoping that the bugs might have been fixed. Here's a
On Feb 4, 12:07 pm, dannychrastina danny.chrast...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 4, 8:13 pm, Alexander Dreyer
Hi Danny,
jan.alexander.dre...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Danny,
although the Intel-Compiler environment is not advised, I would also
be interested in a dump of the scons environment,
On Feb 4, 10:24 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
SNIP
On Fedora 9, 32 bits I had those known issues
plus 11 mysterious memory errors.
If we can't fix this fedora bug before the release, we *have* to put a
On Feb 4, 12:41 pm, Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
SNIP
Hi Michael,
Hi Jaap,
So far the issue seems to be only at startup, i.e once Sage is up and
running I have not observed a libSingular related memory failure. And
the fix so far is only a hunch, I have
On Feb 4, 1:15 pm, dannychrastina danny.chrast...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
SNIP
and like the likely culprit IMHO.
Strange to me that it's only polybori which wouldn't build, and that I
only ever saw gcc an g++ being called, and sage comes with its own
fortran compiler so why would i go
On Feb 4, 1:16 pm, Alexander Dreyer
jan.alexander.dre...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi! 'LINK': '$SMARTLINK',
'LINKCOM': '$LINK -o $TARGET $LINKFLAGS $SOURCES $_LIBDIRFLAGS
$_LIBFLAGS',
and like the likely culprit IMHO.
yeah, and it seems, that the scons people are not aware of this
On Feb 4, 1:16 pm, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 4, 6:26 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello folks,
3.3.alpha5 is out and unlike 3.3.alpha4 it is being announced on sage-
devel.
[snip]
If you want to get a patch in before the
ReST transition
On Feb 4, 2:36 pm, Rob Beezer goo...@beezer.cotse.net wrote:
Hi Rob,
I still get a lot of education-related email from Mathematica, and it
has struck me the past few months that they seemed much more engaged
or concerned about the welfare of their users. So I'd been having
some of the
On Feb 4, 10:18 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 4:59 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Hi Minh,
AFAIK Matlab can also interface to the Maple kernel in order to make
use of Maple's symbolic computation features. The following book has
made
If you check out http://sagemath.org/mirrors.html you see that many
mirrors are out of date, mostly the ones that mirror off sage.math
instead of sagemath.org. One reason is likely that the place on
sage.math where to mirror from has changes, but the old place is
linked to the new place.
On Feb 5, 10:29 am, Ronan Paixão ronanpai...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
Hmm, do you mean SSE only, i.e. no SSE2 or higher or no SSE at all. No
SSE2 or high might be doable once I revamp the build system via #2999-
#3001 by tightly controlling CFLAGS and friends. But honestly while
doing
On Feb 5, 12:28 pm, Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
something deeper inside libSingular. I have posted some speculation
why some runs fail and other runs do not, so I am not going to repeat
it here and bore 99.5% of Sage devs to death again :)
I'm one of the other
SNIP
Oops, I missed some.
opteron Ubuntu 6.10 (sagemath.org): 1 failure
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/calculus/calculus.py
Total time for all tests: 5690.1 seconds
NOISE:
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/calculus/calculus.py
On Feb 5, 1:09 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
SNIP
OS X PowerPC 10.5:
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/toy_d_basis.py
Got a fix that will be merged in a minute.
sage -t -long
While poking around some matplotlib related blowup around libpng and
frameworks I noticed the following:
We have two sets of dynamic libpngs:
On Linux:
-rw-r--r-- 1 mabshoff mabshoff 689468 2009-02-03 19:30 local/lib/
libpng12.a
-rwxr-xr-x 1 mabshoff mabshoff839 2009-02-03 19:30 local/lib
On Feb 6, 2:28 am, parisse bernard.pari...@ujf-grenoble.fr wrote:
SNIP
So, you are using Cocoa or cocoalib?
cocoalib
Being an expert for the groebner
bases functionality, I can say,
that Singular's biggest strength in this area, is supporting many,
many implementations
of
On Feb 6, 3:30 am, Martin Albrecht m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de
wrote:
* libSingular is significant more effort to build and the interface
isn't exactly clean
That can and is being addressed.
Sure, things are getting better and having other external uses, i.e.
GFan as you mention below
On Feb 6, 1:47 am, mhampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote:
Three cheers! Hooray! Hooray! Hooray!
I think I've had things related to this crop up several times, and I
am glad you have resolved it (crossing my fingers!).
-Marshall
Well, we are not quite there yet, but if you don't want to do
On Feb 6, 4:11 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
My apologies for the double post.
Yes, I took Singular 3-0-3 using slimgb and computed the DegRevLex as
well as Lex basis of homogenized Karatsuba 7 for some F_p (p=31007
maybe?) and the rationals.
* For DegRevLex and F_p
On Feb 6, 6:38 am, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for the late reply: on ubuntu amd64 hardy heron, only 1 failure,
very similar
to one already reported by William:
Hi David,
can you see if the patch at #5172 fixes it for you? It has already
been merged in alpha6, but in case
On Feb 6, 7:03 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Ronan Paixão wrote:
Of course, concerns about security and usability may well restrict the
privileges to a specific subset of Sage's commands and fraction of
server resources. Still, it would be great if Wikipedia
On Feb 6, 7:35 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
SNIP
Yes, but Jython does not support the Python C-API, so you cannot run
Sage that way. One day far, far into the future this might be doable
via IronPython where a project exists to bring the Python C
On Feb 6, 9:53 am, Ronan Paixão ronanpai...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
Em Ter, 2009-01-27 às 06:13 -0800, mabshoff escreveu:
SNIP
Hi Ronan,
I'm against all that SUA stuff. I completely agree it's a great help to
get sage running on Windows, but that only happens for a very small user
base
Hello folks,
alpha6 is nearly there, but Carl Witty found a whopping show stopper
bug, i.e. #5198 that needs review. While waiting on that one and a
couple other tickets to get reviewed I also checked the status of
various other patches in the review pipeline.
Blockers:
#4752 ([with patch;
On Feb 7, 9:16 am, Ronan Paixão ronanpai...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
SNIP
I respect your opinions and actually I just wanted to post mine. Surely
I don't have the skills even to start such a great venture as porting a
zillion apps to work on Windows. Actually, I don't really intend it to
use
On Feb 7, 3:37 pm, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr
wrote:
Dear William
Hi Florent,
SNIP
Yes... This was perfectly clear to me. And that's why I volunteered to makes
things coherent.
Thanks. It is very important to make all the various classes of Sage
more consistent.
On Feb 8, 1:18 am, Rob Beezer goo...@beezer.cotse.net wrote:
William,
Thanks for all the helpful advice - that'll get me started.
So you're saying that when somebody changed from Sage just having
kernel (the way I implemented it) to having left_kernel and
right_kernel methods, they
in
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.3/
Merging for rc0 has already started and one bug made it into alpha6
that can cause cloning to fail has been resolved. So please pull in
the fix below
#5205: Michael Abshoff: Set # -*- coding: utf-8 -*- encoding for
sage/server
On Feb 8, 9:17 am, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
Build failed on Mac OS X, Intel iMac while compiling gmp-mpir:
PASS: t-assign
PASS: t-binary
PASS: t-cast
PASS: t-constr
PASS: t-headers
PASS: t-istream
istream mpf_t operator wrong
point ,
str 1,
On Feb 8, 4:44 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/2/8 Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com:
SNIP
Hi John, Alex,
Unless calling Singular, or whatever is handling
rational functions in 4 variables over QQ, is slower!
John
QQ[] is implemented via libSingular and orders of
On Feb 8, 11:38 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 10:39 AM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
Micheal,
The above build failure happens on *all* OS X boxes I tested on --
bsd.math.washington.
edu, my laptop, etc. It'll surely even happen on your
Ok, I just check again to be 100% sure an on varro, i.e. OSX 10.4/PPC
using
varro:~/sage-3.3.alpha6-32 mabshoff$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: powerpc-apple-darwin8
Configured with: /var/tmp/gcc/gcc-5370~2/src/configure --disable-
checking -enable-werror --prefix=/usr --mandir=/share/man
On Feb 8, 12:19 pm, Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
here goes alpha6. It should fix all problems reported up to and
including alpha5. It is a colorful mix of mostly patches fixing
various issues including a couple more notebook issues from
On Feb 8, 11:36 am, Rob Beezer goo...@beezer.cotse.net wrote:
There's a developer manual? ;-)
Yes, I am just as surprised as you are. Ironically I have never even
read the Developer's manual in some concentrated effort from cover to
cover, but I have rewritten bits here and there when I
noise on menas, OpenSUSE 10.3/Core2 - I will add this to
#5209
**
File /home/mabshoff/build-3.3.alpha6/sage-3.3.alpha6-menas/devel/sage/
sage/plot/plot.py, line 2582:
sage: generate_plot_points(sin(x), (-pi, pi), randomize=False
On Feb 8, 12:34 pm, Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
SNIP
Thanks Jaap. Can you rerun those ten tests to see if anything pops up?
Since the allocation failure is probabilistic (1 in 4 to 1 in 50)
sooner or later you should get all tests to pass :)
I will run them
On Feb 8, 1:23 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 8:46 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello folks,
here goes alpha6. It should fix all problems reported up to and
including alpha5. It is a colorful mix of mostly patches fixing
On Feb 8, 1:34 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Michael,
SNIP
Hi Minh,
In general if you want to run any alpha/rc/final without building it
check the default place for my releases and you will find a sage.math-
only binary. Unpack that on sage.math, start a notebook
On Feb 8, 2:17 pm, dk dan.kel...@dal.ca wrote:
Hi,
First, an apology: I am not sure I'm doing this entirely correctly.
Nah, this sounds about right, in case it is above average. For some
reason it seems that the moderation system the groups have is racy
since this email showed up twice :)
On Feb 8, 2:38 pm, dk dan.kel...@dal.ca wrote:
Hi Dan,
Thanks, this
sage: from scipy.signal.filter_design import *
sage: butter(2r,0.5r)
works beautifully. I really appreciate the help provided (within
moments!) on this list.
PS. the reason I'm doing this in sage and not in
On Feb 8, 2:46 pm, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 2:43 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
If you want just python + scipy + numpy you can run
./sage -python
and then you won't have to deal with the pesky preparser in Sage :)
Actually, sage
On Feb 8, 2:56 pm, Rob Beezer goo...@beezer.cotse.net wrote:
Michael,
Hi Rob,
The material in the developers guide on doctests is informative, and
does mention about the random number generator being reset for each
test.
Ok.
I've posted a patch - just holler if it is not in a usable
On Feb 8, 9:29 pm, Rob Beezer goo...@beezer.cotse.net wrote:
When you follow the link to the demos, you get a graphic on the right,
where if you move the mouse over the plot, text below continuously
updates the coordinates. The vertical scale appears logarithmic and
the coordinates are
On Feb 8, 10:53 pm, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I just started the the build of 3.3.alpha6 on my Intel Core2Duo
MacBook with OS X 10.4.11 / Xcode 2.5.
The build of mpir-0.9.rc3 went fine on this box, too; gcc -v gives
there:
gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Hello folks,
3.3.rc0 will drop tonight and this is my status list:
Unresolved blocker:
#4942: find_root() is broken when interval borders cannot be evaluated
(Mike looked at it, it seems like a scipy issue)
#5100: worksheets: can't empty the trash (safari only?) (no lead)
#5210:
On Feb 9, 12:40 pm, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Tim Abbott tabb...@mit.edu wrote:
Hi Tim, Ondrej,
I mentioned that I'd send mail here again once the segfault problems are
fixed.
I want to congratulate you once again for all the work you did. I
On Feb 9, 9:09 am, gedaliah gwol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This looks like the relevant portion of the log --
if /bin/sh /local/ftp/linux/sage/sage-3.2.3/spkg/build/gnutls-2.2.1.p1/
src/build-aux/missing --run makeinfo -I ../doc -I . \
-o gnutls.info gnutls.texi; \
then \
rc=0; \
cd
On Feb 9, 12:41 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Rob Beezer wrote:
When you follow the link to the demos, you get a graphic on the right,
where if you move the mouse over the plot, text below continuously
updates the coordinates. The vertical scale appears logarithmic
On Feb 9, 1:43 pm, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 1:17 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
* fix the trivial issues Tim reported a while back, i.e. #3686-
#3690
* fix the non-owner ought to be able to doctest issues, i.e. #5155 so
On Feb 9, 10:39 am, mhampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this is a great idea. It might not solve the problem of
clutter immediately, because if something like eigenvectors_right is
removed it would break a lot of existing code. But perhaps we could
remove such things in 4.0 after
On Feb 9, 2:08 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
SNIP
Well, svg on IE requires a plugin while the canvas element seems to be
support by all major rendering engines. So why make things
complicated? Anything requiring a plugin leads to usability problems
On Feb 5, 12:33 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
If you check outhttp://sagemath.org/mirrors.htmlyou see that many
mirrors are out of date, mostly the ones that mirror off sage.math
instead of sagemath.org. One reason is likely that the place on
sage.math where to mirror from has
On Feb 10, 2:02 am, Martin Albrecht m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de
wrote:
Hi,
We should never intentionally break people's code like that if there
is no pressing issue. Adding deprecation warnings is ok to point
people in the right direction, but from discussions about this at SD12
and
On Feb 10, 4:08 am, Martin Albrecht m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de
wrote:
Hi Martin,
It seems to me: Sage isn't done yet and pretending it was does more harm
than good by making it more difficult to contribute.
Why? Can you make a concrete example at what you are driving at?
Methods
On Feb 10, 4:45 am, Martin Albrecht m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de
wrote:
Hi Martin,
Think about e.g. the planed break up of gen.pyx into elements that make
sense.
Sure, but that will happen transparently without any impact to the
user's code.
I am pretty sure it will have an
On Feb 10, 5:18 am, mhampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote:
I think its hard to get a one-size-fits-all policy here. I am
thinking specifically of the polytope code in polyhedra.py - I am very
happy with the progress so far, but its still young code that has bugs
and some architectural issues.
On Feb 10, 6:12 am, Stan Schymanski schym...@gmail.com wrote:
William Stein wrote:
Hi Stan,
. Maybe it
would be good to somehow keep unanswered emails at the top of list. Not
sure if this is possible in Google Groups.
I am not aware of any mechanism that would let you do that in Google
On Feb 10, 7:16 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
SNIP
Well, there are enough people around that if you remove right_kernel()
or whatever will end up with broken code. Having it deprecated for a
year or two seems to have zero cost to me.
While
On Feb 10, 10:39 am, gedaliah gwol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 9, 4:41 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
Hi,
Anyway, so more info on your system: How current a RHEL 4 system is
it? I have a RHEL 4.6 or 4.7 vmaware image, but I have never broken it
out to test the build
On Feb 10, 2:45 am, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
Hi Robert,
It's quite tied up into the category framework, so I don't see a way
to merge it into Sage without the category framework. As for the
category framework itself: it has been experimented with
On Feb 10, 9:27 pm, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky zzn...@gmail.com wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
SNIP
I'm just starting to test this on my x86_64 openSUSE 11.1 Linux system.
Just out of curiosity, how come R is all the way back at 2.6.1? The R
project is now at 2.8.1, and I think 2.9 is coming in April
On Feb 10, 10:46 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sage-Devel,
On Thursday I will give a talk to the Virtual Sun User's Group,
which is basically some online web talk to about 80 people. The notes
are here (mainly look at the pdf):
http://wstein.org/talks/20090212-sun/
On Feb 10, 11:31 pm, Craig Citro craigci...@gmail.com wrote:
You might want to remove the two sentences The above issues boil down
to a handful of problems. All but one or two are identical to problems
with sparc/mark. from the Solaris porting slide and instead add a
link to the main
On Feb 11, 9:45 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Simon King k...@mathematik.uni-jena.de
wrote:
Hi,
Dear sage developers,
some people, including myself, believe that Sage should contain more
tools for topology. E.g., there was a thread
On Feb 11, 9:22 am, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:15 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
That is not how the notebook works. By default the notebook
listens *only* on localhost, which means nobody else. This is a very
important security
1701 - 1800 of 2594 matches
Mail list logo
