Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
Phillip Jones schrieb:
I experienced the same thing on my Mac. I end up in this position after
I manually removing the _msf_ files to newsgroups to clean up some
strange problems (Massages being marked as read before I could get to
read them and so on.). Its a bug once
Subject: says it all. :)
I did read here that SM 2.0 will supposedly work on Win 7
as a 32bit application. But I am asking specifically,
about any version built for 64 bits on a cpu like the
Intel core i7 920. Because that's what I'm hoping to
upgrade to.
As a secondary question, How about any 64
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
And Tidy Extension (HTML Validator) both in SM and FF show 29 error
and 2 warnings just on the opening page.
Thanks, I already told them the W3C validator returns 8 errors and 13
warnings. But unless I can show a relationship between one or more
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
And Tidy Extension (HTML Validator) both in SM and FF show 29 error
and 2 warnings just on the opening page.
Thanks, I already told them the W3C validator returns 8 errors and 13
warnings. But unless I can show a relationship between one or more
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
And Tidy Extension (HTML Validator) both in SM and FF show 29 error
and 2 warnings just on the opening page.
Thanks, I already told them the W3C validator returns 8 errors and 13
warnings
Phillip Pi wrote:
Hello.
http://www.bellagio.com/ showed: XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
Location: http://www.bellagio.com/
Line Number 9, Column 27:scriptdocument.write('s'+'cript
language=JavaScript
src=http://switch.atdmt.com/jaction/mgmmgm_BellagioHomepage_1;/s'+'cript')/script
On 12/25, Jeff wrote:
.
I no longer have any idea what the folder structure of the affected
branches is supposed to be. I don't know how Mozilla stores the logical
folder structure.
FYI. The logical folder structure for Mozilla (SeaMonkey) email
folders is:
The
NO wrote:
. many levels snipped ...
I think I was confused by your input. I need to be clear that you
understand that the e-mails do show up in my in-box, yet there are a few
which do not show any content or html content, which is not readable.
I have
MS Win98se system with SM connected to mail.rdu.bellsouth.net SMTP server.
I retrieved an email message, selected Reply all, composed my reply
and pressed Send.
The system puts up an Alert box with the message
An error occurred while sending mail. The mail server responded not
our customer.
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
I retrieved an email message, selected Reply all, composed my reply
and pressed Send.
The system puts up an Alert box with the message
An error occurred while sending mail. The mail server responded not
our customer. Please verify
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
if you get a popup message telling you there is a problem with an email
address, then that message is coming from SM, and you have to hunt and
find which one is an error. It could be something like
dan#whatever,com. Notice the errors in it. If you
Ray_Net wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
On the same news-server ...
Clicking Click here to remove all expired articles works for a
group and did not work for another group.
Any idea about the origin of this problem ?
I don't understand. You have two newsgroups
Ray_Net wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
On the same news-server ...
Clicking Click here to remove all expired articles works for a
group and did not work for another group.
Any idea about the origin of this problem ?
I
--(February 4, 2009) Firefox Update Fixes Six Flaws
Mozilla has released an updated version of Firefox that addresses
six vulnerabilities in the browser. The most serious of the batch
is a critical JavaScript flaw affecting Firefox's layout engine;
it could be exploited to crash the browser and
Jim S wrote:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:05:23 -0500, BeeNeR wrote:
On or about 2/7/2009 7:01 PM, Daniel typed the following:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
--(February 4, 2009) Firefox Update Fixes Six Flaws
Mozilla has released an updated version of Firefox that addresses
six vulnerabilities
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Because I'm using Win98se and 2.xxx is promised not to work with Win98!
have you checked out this?:
Didn't know about this. But now I have filed the references,
and will check it out. Probably when SM2.x comes out.
http
SM 1.1.14 on Win98se.
I wanted to cross post an article to
mozilla.support.seamonkey and bellsouth.net.support.news-service.
The news server newsgroups.bellsouth.net carries both groups
and I am subscribed to the mozilla.support.seamonkey newsgroup
on both servers.
However connected to the
SM 1.1.14 on Win98se.
In my message about cross posting I wrote:
I wanted to cross post an article to
mozilla.support.seamonkey and bellsouth.net.support.news-service.
The news server newsgroups.bellsouth.net carries both groups
and I am subscribed to the mozilla.support.seamonkey newsgroup
on
System Pentium 3 @ 500Mhz with 750Mb memory
OS is Win98se with SM 1.1.14
1) I am experiencing long waits and pauses at various times
in the news client.
1.1) When I switch newsgroups by clicking on a new group
or using the down arrow there will often be up to a 30 second
pause before the
Ray_Net wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
On the same news-server ...
Clicking Click here to remove all expired articles works for a
group and did not work for another group.
Any
System is Win98se on a 500Mhz Pentium 3 with ~760Mb of memory.
I just last week updated to from SM 1.0.7 to 1.1.14. and newsreader
performance has degraded abysmally!
Watching the behaviour with the system performance monitor, I notice
that system memory almost invariably gets 100% allocated,
Ray_Net wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
System is Win98se on a 500Mhz Pentium 3 with ~760Mb of memory.
I just last week updated to from SM 1.0.7 to 1.1.14. and newsreader
performance has degraded abysmally!
Watching the behaviour with the system performance monitor, I notice
that system memory
Philip Chee wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:05:57 -0800, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
I doubt that it will be fixed, as the devs are
concentrating their efforts on SM2, and couldn't
careless about the 1.1 series. So, the only option I
can say is to reboot every now and then.
Let's
NoOp wrote:
On 02/14/2009 01:16 AM, Stéphane Grégoire wrote:
Hi,
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj a tapoté, le 14.02.2009 02:43:
Thank you very much for the progressive 'tongue in cheek' advice.
Well soon the SMs I can use will be completely dead end anyways,
since the 2.x versions won't work with WIN98
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Well soon the SMs I can use will be completely dead end anyways,
since the 2.x versions won't work with WIN98.
Well, Win98 has been abandoned by its creator for a long time now and
doesn't get any further security fixes itself, so I see
On top of the little mail envelope icon to the left of the line
labeling my mail accounts there is, painted on, a submicroscopic
icon. When I look at it under the system magnifying glass, it,
sort of, looks like a hasp. What is this supposed to mean?
At various other times there are other diverse
Jay Garcia wrote:
On 20.02.2009 01:50, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
--- Original Message ---
On top of the little mail envelope icon to the left of the line
labeling my mail accounts there is, painted on, a submicroscopic
icon. When I look at it under the system magnifying glass, it,
sort
System is WIN 98se
After installing SM 1.1.14 which includes GRE 1.8.1.19_2008120416,
I find that, although the setup.ini for GRE 1.8.1.19... speaks of
uninstalling former versions of GRE, I still have a
1.4f_2003062408 subdirectory under
C:\Program Files\Common Files\mozilla.org\GRE
At the
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
System is WIN 98se
After installing SM 1.1.14 which includes GRE 1.8.1.19_2008120416,
I find that, although the setup.ini for GRE 1.8.1.19... speaks of
uninstalling former versions of GRE, I still have a
1.4f_2003062408
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Could some one explain what happen when we clink on the link
initiating the action -
news://news.scarlet.be
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
System is WIN 98se
After installing SM 1.1.14 which includes GRE 1.8.1.19_2008120416,
I find that, although the setup.ini for GRE 1.8.1.19... speaks of
uninstalling former versions
Lee wrote:
To the best of my knowledge I followed the specific instructions given
but cannot receive my mail via SeaMonkey. Also my server says it
does not have a secure connection.
...
Thanks for your reply.
L e e (in Florida)
O.k. I am on BS DSL here in the Raleigh Durham
System is Win98 se and SM 1.1.14
Recently (since upgrading to 1.1.14) on some web pages I have had
the following:
1) I hover over a #type link internal to the page and a little window
pops up showing a miniaturized contents at the link. Or over the tab
for a covered tab window and see a miniature
System Win 98 se and SM 1.1.14
I try to download an article and get a blank screen, with _done_ on
the status line at the bottom of the screen.
I play around trying to reload the article, backup to previous
article, mark it unread and come back at a later time ...
No luck I keep getting a blank
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
System is Win98 se and SM 1.1.14
Recently (since upgrading to 1.1.14) on some web pages I have had
the following:
1) I hover over a #type link internal to the page and a little window
pops up showing a miniaturized contents
Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:
I haven't read the whole thread, but I recently went through this with
the change from bellsouth to att.yahoo. Enter about:config in the space
for url's and filter on smtp. The results should look something like this:
user_pref(mail.identity.id1.smtpServer, smtp2);
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:
Ros, what Peter did . . . . Then Peter did a
cut-and-paste into his mail.
who!?
Ros as in ROStyslaw!!
Daniel
I snipped
Keith Whaley wrote:
NoOp wrote:
... snip ,,,
I recommend that you use the newsreader vs list to participate. That way
you can easily review threads posts from over a year ago.
Subcribe to: news.mozilla.org
This group: mozilla.support.seamonkey
Development:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:06:12 -0800, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
My mozilla.support.seamonkey newsgroup only contains 37,371 messages
at this time!
I've only got 232
I think you mean 37,232
Now up to
Stéphane Grégoire wrote:
Hi,
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj a tapoté, le 04.03.2009 21:18:
My SM 1.1.14 reports 37227 articles in the group.
My Seamonkey 2.0a3 say exactly the same and certainly 37228 when this
message will be posted.
The first message i have is on 10.01.2006 07:04.
and Xref: number1
Martin Feitag wrote:
Ant schrieb:
On 3/7/2009 3:20 PM PT, BeeNeR typed:
On or about 3/7/2009 12:28 PM, Ant typed the following:
Hi!
I was viewing
http://www.officedepot.com/catalog/txtSearchDD.do?jopa=s5SHQCC0IOOaUna7xLgXh3Unorefinement=truesearchTxt=Logitech+Z-2300#
and wanted to print
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
terje wrote:
... Big snip. ..
and introducing an OFF TOPIC thread drift question
Basically, do not use Inbox as a long term repository for stored email.
If you need to keep email, store it in archive folders.
nobodyh...@min.net wrote:
In 9kadnatbvfsgnibunz2dnuvz_uown...@mozilla.org, on 03/13/09
at 06:14 PM, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
peter.potamus.the.purple.hi...@gmail.com said:
Oldest OS on computers with internet access should be Win2000 by now for
most companies ;-)
sorry, but I still
W. Watson wrote:
I've found that my SM mailer will not accept anything over 10M (See
Subject). However, I've recently gotten 18M wmv files from others. I
guess it's all about one's ISP?
Yeah I don't think there's any practical SM limit, it's up to your and
the recipients ISP and any in
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Martin Feitag:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo schrieb:
Martin Feitag wrote:
here's a list: http://www.filehoster.info/filehoster.php
Englisch -- is that the German spelling of English?
Yes :-)
It would be nice if we could write here in german. *g*
Hartmut
Nein.
Win 98se, SM 1.1.16
I would like to enter, store, and use URIs such as
news://216.77.188.18/{newsgroup-name}?list-ids
e.g. news://216.77.188.18/soc.culture.ukrainian?list-ids
in my bookmarks file. Can this be done? , and if so, How?
The reason is that entering this in the URI window of
the
Martin Feitag wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj schrieb:
Win 98se, SM 1.1.16
I would like to enter, store, and use URIs such as
news://216.77.188.18/{newsgroup-name}?list-ids
e.g. news://216.77.188.18/soc.culture.ukrainian?list-ids
in my bookmarks file. Can this be done? , and if so, How?
The reason
System W98se, SeaMonkey v 1.1.14, default download, and install
2/5/2009. No extensions.
Today while trying to read news.
XML Parsing Error: No element found
Location : jar : resource :
///chrome/toolkit.jar!/content/global/netError.xhtml
line Number 1, Column 1:
What does this mean?
Why all of
SM 1.1.14 on a W98se system
How do I construct a filter that will mark all arriving articles
that have a particular newsgroup in the Newsgroups: header line
and specific words in Subject: header line, as read.
Specifically:
for newsgroup = alt.computer
Subject: = My vintage dream PC
Daniel wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
JR WG wrote ...
And are we really interested in what 'the opposition' are doing :)
No, not really, except that it may influence where SM browser goes.
Daniel
I certainly read that as you contradicting yourself.
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Phillip Pi wrote:
I also e-mailed to webmas...@fedex.com and waited for the replies from
both from it and online form. I got an e-mail reply:
...
Thank you for using FedEx Online Support. In answer to your
question, I'm
sorry for the inconvenience but Fedex
Rick Merrill wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sat, 05 Sep 2009 09:59:36 -0400, Rick Merrill wrote:
Smiles wrote:
Good day
I have a client who uses a touch pad with a mouth stick is there a
keyboard shortcut to change from one email account to another
currently we have had to set each account
W98se, SM 1.1.14
How do I set/change the font size (and the [default] encoding)
for the fonts which are used to display the accounts and folders,
and also in the panel that displays the mail message or news
articles Subject: lines ?
All of a sudden the printing, i.e. the font sizes in these
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.2: The new major
release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download now!
Building on the same Mozilla platform as the newest Firefox release, it
delivers the latest developments in web technologies
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 7/7/2011 11:46 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.2: The new major
release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download now!
Building on the same Mozilla platform as the
Graham P Davis wrote:
I thought I'd have another try with Seamonkey 2.1 but ran into a couple
of problems.
(1) I thought I saw SM say it was importing FF5 bookmarks but must have
been mistaken. I know other browsers can't manage that trick but would
have thought another Mozilla product would
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 09/07/2011 12:41, Ray_Net told the world:
This is exactly my opinion ... developpers are only interested to
implement new gadgets instead of fixing bugs. SM is full of bugs that
would never been corrected ... because those bug did not stop SM
working. But
Chris Ilias wrote:
On 11-07-09 2:11 PM, Lee wrote:
...
SeaMonkey 2.2 and Firefox 5 are stable.
But the automatic update script isn't even out yet. So 2.2 hasn't had
a chance to spread yet.
Of course it may be declared stable by edict, with all fixes later,
in future versions,
Chris Ilias wrote:
On 11-07-10 8:52 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
On 11-07-09 2:11 PM, Lee wrote:
...
SeaMonkey 2.2 and Firefox 5 are stable.
But the automatic update script isn't even out yet. So 2.2 hasn't had
a chance to spread yet.
Of course it may
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
In SM 2.1.1pre if I select the Collected Addresses book, pick an
address I can drag and drop the address into any other book. And it
happens right away, and the book name highlights so I'm sure which
book I'm dropping into, and
JeffM wrote:
JeffM wrote:
Whenever I see these long diatribes about SeaMonkey,
I note that they never mention the authors' participation
in the Release Candidate trial/review process.
Jay Garcia wrote:
What else is required other than to be a user,
A critique that comes as late as so many
JeffM wrote:
JeffM wrote:
those folks who are prone to complaining
*should* be the ones who point out shortcomings
**when something can more easily be done about those**
i.e. **early** aka **during pre-release**.
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
All right , then where does the developer coouncil
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On 18/07/2011 12:50, Philip Chee wrote:
On 18/07/2011 10:46, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
All right, then where does the developer council/
governing body publish the details of the planned
changes to be introduced in the next release, so
JeffM wrote:
JeffM wrote:
Hmmm. I've already used this analogy once today (elsewhere).
Sometimes it only takes ONE individual to affect a change:
http://google.com/search?tbs=dfn:1q=hung-jury
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
OK, so if I dedicate my life to making sure everyone knows
that it's Effect
Jim Dell wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not
install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply
to gain access to a site where that manual hack (simple to do) would
suffice.
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/20/11 6:20 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/20/11 12:28 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Example:
http://maps.nationalgeographic.com/maps/map-machine#s=rc=-56.09018578602696,%20-34.39591415226459z=4
The map pane is blank but the rest of the page
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Jim Dell wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not
install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply
to gain access to a site
GerardJan wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/20/11 6:20 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/20/11 12:28 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Example:
http://maps.nationalgeographic.com/maps/map-machine#s=rc=-56.09018578602696,%20-34.39591415226459z=4
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Mr. Gallagher's UA string indicates SM 2.0.14
So the politically correct answer is that he's on an obsolete,
superceded version.
Instruct him to install the pre-release 2.3 beta. :/ :\
Perhaps, perhaps, that will help. :)
Others with both
JeffM wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
The forward charge by the bull elephants
to introduce new features is all well and good.
But I'd like to see an army with brooms and pooper scoopers
clean up the field between the charging elephants
and us the plodding following mass of users.
So that we
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 7/22/2011 2:42 AM, dsavitsk wrote:
I just installed 2.2 or SeaMonkey, and the center mounse button on a
Thinkpad no longer scrolls.
...
Plus, right clicking the tab bar no longer opens a new tab.
If you mean there is no longer a
Now with the release of the auto upgrade script from 2.0.14 to 2.2
begins the testing of 2.2 by the actual using public.
Now all the gratuitous UI changes as well as the more serious bugs
crawl out of the woodwork (the code) and begin to be reported.
In previous version upgrades, there might have
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
JD wrote:
Here is my paste as quotation:
I tried what you said, by copying something from notepad with no line
length and this is how it looks using a right mouse click and
selecting paste as quotation.
A question :
Where did you find Paste
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Pat Connors schrieb:
Now we have 2.3 and more complaints.
Why more complaints? And 2.3 is still in beta, but beta 2 actually fixes
some issues that have been reported with 2.2 here...
Robert Kaiser
On balance, Has the number of known bugs and annoyances increased, or
Philip Chee wrote:
On 05/08/2011 02:31, Gerry Hickman wrote:
Hi,
I've just updated to SM 2.2, in the mail and news window there's a new
tool bar called the search bar that takes up quite a lot of room. In
the old 2.0, the search boxes were part of the message list pane and
were very compact,
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Mike wrote:
XP users have a little under three years left.
Plenty of time to save pennies for some tech.
It is a depressing thought. Can there really be life after XP ?
Oh sure :-) MS Windows 8 has even been pre-announced. :-)
dev wrote:
Now if SM only supported ALL the extensions that work in FF I could use
it exclusively. ^_^
How about , 'If SM only had support?'
and not just experimental development?
or should that be , 'developmental experiments :-\ ' ?.
___
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Bill Davidsen schrieb:
Some commercial users have complained that they can't do a QA cycle
that
often, and according to the reports were told that Firefox is not
suitable for business use.
Actually, Mozilla is trying to
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj schrieb:
What is the definition that you are using of 'progress'?
Is it only new features or wrinkles in the UI, or can it be eradication
of existing bugs and misguided UI feature implementations?
Both, even simplifying UI counts as that - at least
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) schrieb:
Unfortunately, from a user perspective, major
change is rarely welcome, whilst increased security and incremental
bug fixes are universally appreciated.
Right, that's why the major change the web brought to computers was
never
Robert Kaiser wrote:
PhillipJones schrieb:
The original post meant SeaMonkey.
It didn't.
FF is up to 5.6.7.8 or whatever.
SM increments their major updates by .1's
2.0, 2.1, 2.2., 2.3, 2.4 and so on.
That is just a different numbering system, the rate and size of updates
is very similar.
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
But, the thing is, with limited resources available, supporting
those old releases means that the new release does not receive as
much work as it needs. With Seamonkey tied to the every-six-weeks
Mozilla release schedule, delaying release is not an
WLS wrote:
The Mozilla Foundation is leading the development of a better Internet.
http://www.mozilla.org/about/mission.html
http://www.mozilla.org/about/manifesto
By its' own claims and pronouncements!
Just because you don't like it, don't spread misinformation.
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 07 Aug 2011 20:29:22 -0400, /Paul B. Gallagher/:
As our parents used to ask, If everyone else jumped off a cliff,
would you do it, too? Just because the FF people decided to rush
things and churn out a series of half-baked products for
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
WLS wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
I'm only saying what I've read here from authoritative sources; the
only addition is my judgment half-baked, which reflects many of
the opinions voiced here.
If you don't like it, speak to the merits of the argument. You need
not
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 07/08/2011 21:29, Paul B. Gallagher told the world:
MCBastos wrote:
But, the thing is, with limited resources available, supporting
those old releases means that the new release does not receive as
much work as it needs. With Seamonkey tied to the
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj schrieb:
What's relevant is not their naming but their frequency and buggines!
Right, and SeaMonkey matches Firefox both in frequency as well as mostly
in how few bugs it has, though SeaMonkey tends to have a bit more of
those than Firefox recently
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 09/08/2011 21:18, Rufus told the world:
...it was a suggestion for a *new* SM product from the *SM* team because
someone posed a question - and not even that particular product, it's an
*example*...crap, can't anybody around here think *conceptually*?
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 09/08/2011 21:18, Rufus told the world:
...it was a suggestion for a *new* SM product from the *SM* team
because
someone posed a question - and not even that particular product
Chris Ilias wrote:
On 11-08-11 12:37 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Looking at this posting, I see that there was a follow up posting by
PhillipJones to my cynical posting I wish I could writhe ... ...
pooper scooper brigade. But I can not find PhillipJoness' posting at
Mozilla News.
It used
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
On 11-08-11 12:37 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Looking at this posting, I see that there was a follow up posting by
PhillipJones to my cynical posting I wish I could writhe ... ...
pooper scooper brigade. But I can
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
The link you provide above takes me to a google groups login
page.
All my tries to retrieve previous articles by clicking on
Message-IDs or the numbers assigned them in the References
Tom Pamin wrote:
Tom Pamin wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 11/08/2011 17:48, Tom Pamin told the world:
Hotmail is now asking me to upgrade my browser every time I log in. I
already modified my about:config in order to get Yahoo Mail to work, by
adding Firefox/3.0 after
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj schrieb:
But of course with 2.3 almost here,
bugs with 2.1 or 2.2 or upgrade there-to will not be addressed.
Bullshit! The bug fixes will just be included in future releases. That
is, if good bug fixes are found - for this bookmark importing problem
Chris Ilias wrote:
On 11-08-15 1:31 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj schrieb:
But of course with 2.3 almost here,
bugs with 2.1 or 2.2 or upgrade there-to will not be addressed.
Bullshit! The bug fixes will just be included in future releases
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 8/16/2011 5:38 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.2: The new major
release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download now!
Building on the same Mozilla platform as the newest Firefox release, it
Mike wrote:
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
What I found instead was that the dialogue box was
not fully visible (see screenshot) --
You can grab the bottom border of the Window and expand it. Though I
agree the default view should be more intuitive. Either make it obvious
in some
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Mike wrote:
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
What I found instead was that the dialogue box was
not fully visible (see screenshot) --
You can grab the bottom border of the Window and expand it.
Though I agree the default view should be more
JD wrote:
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Mike wrote:
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
What I found instead was that the dialogue box was
not fully visible (see screenshot) --
You can grab the bottom border of the Window and expand it.
Though I agree the default view
bern...@nospam.com wrote:
I just noticed something odd. My computer updated Seamonkey form 2.2 to
2.3 After the update, when I delete email, it seems to delay about 3
seconds for every email on the list I delete if I delete 1 at a time. I
highlight a message, click delete, and there is a 3
1 - 100 of 273 matches
Mail list logo
