Hi,
When I leave TB open for a while, it doesn't seem to update its inbox listing
automatically when new messages arrive on the server. If I select another
folder, then select the inbox again, it updates the index for the folder and
displays a bunch of new messages.
I haven't yet determined what
about this, but you beat me to it. TB!
should at least use two connections: one to respond to my input and the
other to do syncing, etc.
--
Regards, Charles.
Using TB! 2.12 Beta/8 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 /Courier IMAP 3.0.5
Current version
Hi Allie Martin
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 12:38:35 [GMT -0500] (which was 10:38 AM where
I live) you wrote:
Kevin Amazon wrote:
snip
I think he's more thinking about simply changing a POP to an IMAP
account. TB! autocreates corresponding IMAP
Hello Kevin,
KA Actually, all the IMAP servers are local on gig ethernet. Speed is not
KA an issue. I will admit some of the speed issues are the result of my
KA TB settings. I have had so many problems with IMAP synchronizations, I
KA finally flush all the caches on exit so, on the resultant
Hi 9Val
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 23:01:23 [GMT +0300] (which was 1:01 PM where I
live) you wrote:
snip
Well, at home I'm working with IMAP at 21.6Kbit dial-up. So speed is a
really *big* issue for me. And I prefer to use TB! without any
part of managing my mail in POP and would love support
of this in IMAP (along with a few other things )before I consider making
the leap over to IMAP on a full time basis.
--
Regards,
Chris
Created using The Bat! v2.12 Beta/7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 1
OK - I have an IMAP account now.
I have set it up in The Bat on two computers.
In Tne Bat I have the usual sub-folders.
The IMAP account has similar but not the same exactly folders.
If I look at the IMAP account through webmail I have two messages in
Inbox, 1 in SENT and 1 in trash
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Presumably I have to link The Bat folders with the IMAP account
folders but how?
Look in the Account Properties for the IMAP account, click on the Mail
Management section. Look for the For predefined folders... section
and make sure those are set correctly.
Hope
Look in the Account Properties for the IMAP account, click on the Mail
Management section. Look for the For predefined folders... section
and make sure those are set correctly.
Hope that helps.
I had stared and stared and checked and checked but still hadn';t
noticed that!
OK - next Q
, my count goes to 1 when I select the folder and then if I
leave it for a while and another sync operation is done, the count
corrects itself to what it should be.
Though the questions seem to be directed at Ken, I thought I'd answer
them myself.
BTW are you a bit experienced with IMAP
as it
currently is. I've also tried many other clients in the interim and
have a good idea of how TB!'s IMAP works when compared to other
clients. I can say without reservation that TB!'s is the most elegant
and with the other TB! features makes for the best IMAP client
available. The features just need
in similar
situations I just felt a little miffed because I'd searched and
read for three hours using Google and nowhere were there any answers
to my particular queries.
Anyway - no offense taken at all.
From what I have read - email on te IMAP server stays there unless I
specifically say
However, total IMAP functionality
isn't quite there yet...
Aahh - now here's the rub...
I need to know, before I jump - what functionality is NOT there. My
problem is, not knowing what functionality is possible - I don't know
what's missing.
Will filter actions, auto-replies, auto-message
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 00:42:44 [GMT +0100] (which was 4:42 PM where I
live) you wrote:
However, total IMAP functionality
isn't quite there yet...
Aahh - now here's the rub...
I need to know, before I jump - what
. As with
most things, you'll learn a lot about IMAP as you actually use it.
Anyway - no offense taken at all.
Good!!
From what I have read - email on te IMAP server stays there unless I
specifically say 'bring it here locally'.
Or more commonly ... may I see what is there. Whatever you see is
cached.
I
Kevin Amazon, [KA] wrote:
The key issues with regards to IMAP are:
I wanted to add a couple other lacking features that are very useful:
a) selective download message text without attachments on a per
message basis. One can then view the message body over a slow
connection without having
Hi Allie Martin
-
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, at 21:08:21 [GMT -0500] (which was 7:08 PM where I
live) you wrote:
Kevin Amazon, [KA] wrote:
The key issues with regards to IMAP are:
I wanted to add a couple other lacking features that are very useful
Hello,
MG If I change an account to IMAP and it's not yet fully configured at
MG the ISP end will it damage anything?
I tried this at one point, trying to isolate a problem. I have three
accounts. I was able to switch two of them back without any problems.
The third one switched back but I now
to
fix it. So, from my experience, I wouldn't try it with working
accounts if I were you.
I see you're using v1.62. Is that the version you're referring to? v2
is different. IMAP is completely redone and that sort of switching is
no longer possible.
--
-=[ :Allie: ]=- (List Moderator
Hello,
I tried this at one point, trying to isolate a problem. I have three
AM I see you're using v1.62. Is that the version you're referring to? v2
AM is different. IMAP is completely redone and that sort of switching is
AM no longer possible.
Yes, I was speaking of v1.62.
--
Jack
ken green wrote:
I may have fixed the problem.
Another problem...
No my *other* IMAP account has a message stuck in the Sent folder.
This is a regular plain text message, no attachments.
According to the log, the message appeared to go through.
I decided to try Folder Maintenance. When FM
ken green wrote:
Any recommendations for messages stuck in Sent? I thought I remember
this being an issue awhile back.
Outbox is local, Sent is server-side
--
Ken Green
Using The Bat! v2.10.03 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
Hi
My ISPs have all agreed to install IMAP - except the Microsoft
Exchange Server one - pah!
Anyway, I have located the Protocol change button in the Account
Properties.
So I assume I can select IMAP as a method on an account by account
basis.
If I change an account to IMAP and it's not yet
Marten Gallagher wrote:
If, when IMAP is running, can I change back and forth from IMAP to
POP3 mode for one or more accounts?
No, you can't do this.
You definitely can't change from POP to IMAP. I've tried this. You
have to create a new account and make it IMAP from the outset
You definitely can't change from POP to IMAP. I've tried this. You
have to create a new account and make it IMAP from the outset.
DO you mean that it has to be a new email address different from any
of the POP3 email addresses?
That would be a real pain - in fact it would be unworkable
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, at 21:58:37 [GMT +0100] (which was 1:58 PM where I
live) you wrote:
You definitely can't change from POP to IMAP. I've tried this. You
have to create a new account and make it IMAP from the outset.
DO you
OK - I've set myself up a free IMAP email account (fastmail.fm) to
experiment.
Apart from differnet settings and such I don't at the moment see any
difference and there seems to be adistinct lack of enlightenment on
the BAT web site and forums. A lot of discussion but nothing about how
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're asking pretty basic information here that isn't TB! specific. I
just entered 'What is IMAP' in Google and got some nice links that
explains IMAP and how it works. Starting with some of those links
should have you getting well on your way with understanding how IMAP
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'What is IMAP' in Google
Funny you should say that - cos that's what I always tell clients -
ask Google first..
So I did already (I tend to use this group as the thrid line of
attack: 1 - Help File/Forum / 2 Google / 3 Here) and the links I got were not helpful
to me
Marten Gallagher, [MG] wrote:
I understand exactly how IMAP works - I am a web designer and the
concept of local caching is not alien to me.
I simply was trying to get a handle on how it looks and feels in The
Bat.
Hmmm. You're questions have been very general so I couldn't help
Hi
My email account has just been upgraded to IMAP so I thought I would
check out the abilities of TB. To my surprise the help file is almost
totally devoid of help for IMAP. Anyway, everything seems to connect
OK but I have a few niggling caveats:
1. Deletions dont seem to be sychronised. If I
Quoting Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
4. Is it OK to try a 3 way synchronisation between TB at work, IMAP
and TB at home. My initial testing suggests not.
Hello Mike,
Are you talking about using the same laptop computer from home and from work? If
you have two computers on permanent internet
I tried to clean up some IMAP folders: moved messages to a local
folder, then attempted to delete the IMAP folders
Boy, was that a mistake.
My main IMAP account (THIS IS MY BUSINESS E-MAIL) is now somehow
stuck - I am NOT receiving messages and the message count will not
budge from 39 35
Hi ken,
kg I tried to clean up some IMAP folders: moved
kg Boy, was that a mistake.
I've been there...
kg My main IMAP account (THIS IS MY BUSINESS
kg E-MAIL) is now somehow stuck - I am NOT
kg receiving messages and the message count will
kg not budge from 39 in the Total column.
This has
ken green wrote:
My main IMAP account (THIS IS MY BUSINESS E-MAIL) is now somehow
stuck - I am NOT receiving messages and the message count will not
budge from 39 35 in the Total column.
My Inbox shows 1 * in the Unread column - and that message does not
show up. I cannot get to it through
Hi Peter,
PO Quite some users are / have been 'complaining'
PO about IMAP items. As you'r a beta user, I
PO guess you'r aware of this.
Yes, but how can anyone actually use it without such basic functionality as filtering?
I spend all day manually dragging TBUDL messages to my TBUDL folder.
PO
ken green wrote:
I aborted the process and tried Folder Maintenance again. I tried
just the Inbox and nothing happened. I tried the account (all
folders) and FM ran through, listing IMAP folder compressed after
each folder. Yet I have two folder with n readings
Another update...
I
Hi List,
I have yet to know if the message base
has gone wrong, as is usual. .
Confirmed. The previous message I sent could not be moved to the sent mail folder,
because of some kind of corruption to the message base. New mail was no longer
retrieved, although the unread mail number in the
Christopher Brown wrote:
They have GOT to get IMAP going soon. I sure wish there were more
people complaining about it. I can only conclude either 1)
not many on this list use IMAP, and therefor aren't clamoring for
improvements, or 2) others haven't experienced these problems
to the same
ken green wrote:
Of course, TB continues to lead the industry in smiley support so all
is not lost.
That'll be on the top of my list for selecting a mail reader...
--
Regards, Charles.
Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Peter Ouwehand wrote:
Please more attention and feedback - new beta cycle is dedicated to
bug-fixing. IMAP users your opinions have high priority :)
What about attention and feedback from developers? I don't even know who
they are. Maybe 9val? At least he replies to some of the messages
Peter Ouwehand wrote:
I don't 'know' them either. Except from TB lists or BugTracker.
So that's good then.
Do you 'know' your FreeBSD 4.10 STABLE developers?
They frequent the lists often and some have personal sites.
--
Regards, Charles.
Current
would have been 100 years old in 2005 if she
could have just hung on about a decade longer, often said,
This too shall pass.
Seriously, Ken, from lurking on TBBETA, I gather that it does look as
if they are coming closer to getting a workable IMAP in The Bat! for
you and Allie and all the others who
Hello All,
I am a long-time Bat follower (probably 3 or 4 years), but have only
recently taken the plunge and registered the program because of the
advances made with IMAP support -- I use IMAP exclusively because I need
to be able to read my mail from several different PCs/Unix systems, etc
Christopher Brown, [CB] wrote:
My IMAP folders are not acting up nearly as much these days, but I'm
still having some trouble. One account has stopped retrieving new
messages, although the correct number shows up in the folder view
(under the unread heading, it right now shows 28
Hi List,
My IMAP folders are not acting up nearly as much these days, but I'm still having some
trouble. One account has stopped retrieving new messages, although the correct number
shows up in the folder view (under the unread heading, it right now shows 28*). I
have been playing
Hi List,
My IMAP folders are not acting up nearly as much these days, but I'm still having some
trouble. One account has stopped retrieving new messages, although the correct number
shows up in the folder view (under the unread heading, it right now shows 28*). I
have been playing
SL wrote:
Got a message to say there were problems backing up two of the folders
(Sent and Trash) in the IMAP account...and suggested I delete the
index files and start again
Decided not to bother... I think I will just exclude IMAP message
folder from backup
Hello Bat Persons,
Back in TheBat again after a few problems ('error reading database'
and 'runtime error' messages)...and decided to back up
all...(address book, settings and folders etc with messages for two
POP accounts and one IMAP account). Synchronised the IMAP
if this _incredibly_ basic IMAP feature will ever be
implemented. It sort of defies the point of IMAP if it doesn't work for
outgoing mail.
BTW does (IMAP) filtering from a local sent folder to an IMAP folder
work for you? I get an error.
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter Fjelsten /author
Peter Fjelsten wrote:
I wonder if this _incredibly_ basic IMAP feature will ever be
implemented. It sort of defies the point of IMAP if it doesn't work
for outgoing mail.
It's implemented but it's buggy. There are a few who aren't
experiencing the buggy server side outbox that I am.
BTW
Allie,
On 11-06-2004 19:44, you [AM] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
AM Peter Fjelsten wrote:
I wonder if this _incredibly_ basic IMAP feature will ever be
implemented. It sort of defies the point of IMAP if it doesn't work
for outgoing mail.
AM It's implemented but it's buggy
): for how many does
PF this actually work?
Although it's hard to see from there, I've got my hand in the air! ;-)
Server side Outbox causes issues here!
--
Cheers,
Chris
In this case, I'm using IMAP with The Bat! v2.11.03 on Windows XP 5.1
Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Peter Fjelsten, [PF] wrote:
AM My Sent folder is on the server while my Outbox is local.
So Outgoing mail filters work?
Yes. Though I've been filtering to a local folder. I haven't tried
filtering to server side folders.
--
-=[ Allie ]=- (List Moderator and fellow end-user)
PGPKeys:
I just got IMAP enabled, and I wanted to have my sent-messages be
stored on the server. If I check the Sent Mail box in the mail
management option dialog, and pick the sent-mail folder on my IMAP
server, it causes outgoing messages to hang instead of sending.
It sits there in the sending mail
Jacob Cohen, [JC] wrote:
I just got IMAP enabled, and I wanted to have my sent-messages be
stored on the server. If I check the Sent Mail box in the mail
management option dialog, and pick the sent-mail folder on my IMAP
server, it causes outgoing messages to hang instead of sending.
Where
stored on the server. If I check the Sent Mail box in the mail
management option dialog, and pick the sent-mail folder on my IMAP
server, it causes outgoing messages to hang instead of sending.
Where is your Outbox? Is it local or server side?
It is local. The only box I'm checking is Sent
Allie,
On 10-06-2004 12:39, you [AM] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
AM Where is your Outbox? Is it local or server side?
AM If it's server side, then make it local.
Having just begun working with IMAP/Exchange again with the same
difficulties with Outbox/Sent mail as previously I assume
Peter Fjelsten, [PF] wrote:
Having just begun working with IMAP/Exchange again with the same
difficulties with Outbox/Sent mail as previously I assume that you
by this mean that IMAP outgoing does not work properly at your end
either?
Nope. I've never gotten it working properly.
It only
There are many features in TB! that ThunderBird lacks and I don't see
AM them as nice features to just have anyway.
snipola
AM I'd never really entertain comparing the two once you're up and going
AM with reading mail as I now am with TB! at work. Now that TB!'s IMAP
AM works well enough for me to read
and 2.11 and
subsequent do not. I can't find any useful messages in the firewall
log.
Does anyone know whether the way The Bat works for both IMAP and POP3
has changed in some subtle way for the 2.11 versions?
--
Cheers,
Phil
Current version
works through the firewall and 2.11 and subsequent do not. I can't
P find any useful messages in the firewall log. Does anyone know
P whether the way The Bat works for both IMAP and POP3 has changed in
P some subtle way for the 2.11 versions?
Most firewalls today will offer application protection, so
Hi Allie,
Most firewalls today will offer application protection, so you have to
give each application permission. At the time a hash is created for
the application. If you upgrade the application, you'll need to change
the firewall rule since the hash for the new executable is different.
I
Hi BatFans
Now for a dumb question:
Can anyone tell me if The Bat v 2.11.x (or 2.10.x) has IMAP IDLE ??
(which...as I understand it from Mozilla ThunderBird...which I also
use...and which has IMAP IDLE...means if you leave your mailer
'on-line'...it will tell you when you have new mail
Hi BatPersons
Someone asked (sorry...can't find the original message) if there were
more IMAP-related problems with TB with versions 2.1.x
It may be coincidence, but I had no problems with TB 'till ver 2.11.x
(as you can see I am now back to ver 2.10.x). I had database
errors...which I
Sl, [S] wrote:
S Can anyone tell me if The Bat v 2.11.x (or 2.10.x) has IMAP IDLE ??
S (which...as I understand it from Mozilla ThunderBird...which I also
S use...and which has IMAP IDLE...means if you leave your mailer
S 'on-line'...it will tell you when you have new mail and download it
S
them *essential* to
effectively and efficiently managing my mail. All ThunderBird has is
good/reliable IMAP support. It has nothing else really. There are some
extensions currently available, but none that offer any real
functionality.
When I couldn't read any messages with TB! on my slow
Allie Martin, [AM] wrote:
AM There are some extensions currently available, but none that offer
AM any real functionality.
Ooops! In all fairness, I forgot about the Enigmail/EnigMIME
extension. This one was nice to use since you could autoPGP/MIME sign
and also autoverify signed messages. I
be superfluous to many users...eg like DVD players ...or cigarette
S lighters...in cars )...but could be nice to have anyway...just in
S case...(Besides...its nice to have options anyway... ;-)
AM All ThunderBird has is good/reliable IMAP support. It has nothing
AM else really. There are some
manually triggering the filter, but again,
CW nothing happened :-(
AM I no longer am able to leave TB! running for long periods since
AM something usually happens with IMAP that requires a restart to get
AM working correctly again. However, I've discovered that disconnecting
AM from the server
Hi Allie
On Friday, June 4, 2004 18:37 your local time, which was Saturday, June
5, 2004 at 00:37 my local time, Allie Martin wrote;
It may very well do. Would you try sending mail with your outbox
local? I can send without trouble only when the outbox is local here.
When using a server side
Hello Keith,
Friday, June 4, 2004, 10:44:51 PM, you wrote:
KR Now that I'm thinking of returning to TB for my IMAP account, can
KR anyone tell me whether or not BayesIT works with IMAP? (I
KR couldn't figure out a way to search this question, since so many
KR users have the word BayesIT
Hello Allie,
Friday, June 4, 2004, 6:37:31 PM, you wrote:
CW Anyone any ideas why this is happening, as it's VERY frustrating!
CW Would it have anything to do with both my outbox and sent items
CW being server side?
It may very well do. Would you try sending mail with your outbox
local? I can
Hello Keith,
On 5 Jun 2004 at 23:44:51 -0600 GMT [07:44 CEST] you wrote:
KR Now that I'm thinking of returning to TB for my IMAP account, can
KR anyone tell me whether or not BayesIT works with IMAP? (I
KR couldn't figure out a way to search this question, since so many
KR users have the word
Hi TB! users,
I've been using TB! for a bit today, and it's suddenly gone all mad on
me!
I first spotted the problem when I noticed some of my mail that was
previously being auto-filtered was no longer moving. Fine I thought,
I'll try manually triggering the filter, but again, nothing happened
Hi Chris
On Saturday, June 5, 2004 21:59 our local time, Chris Weaven [CW] wrote;
Forgot the list doesn't allow for screen images.
CW On restarting TB!, the same problem and I got two AV's (attached).
Therefore, they can be found here;
http://w-world.net/forum_images/TB!-AV's.jpg
--
Cheers,
periods since
something usually happens with IMAP that requires a restart to get
working correctly again. However, I've discovered that disconnecting
from the server and then reconnecting also helps in some instances.
Otherwise an exit and restart is all that will help.
CW Then on further inspection
Hi All,
I upgraded from 2.10.03 to 2.11 and everything seemed OK until I
rebooted my machine. From this point onwards I was unable to connect
to my ISP's IMAP server to read mail. I deleted the account and added
it again in case the settings were corrupted but was still unable to
connect. I tried
Phil, [P] wrote:
P I upgraded from 2.10.03 to 2.11 and everything seemed OK until I
P rebooted my machine. From this point onwards I was unable to
P connect to my ISP's IMAP server to read mail. I deleted the account
P and added it again in case the settings were corrupted but was
P still unable
Hi Allie,
Friday, June 4, 2004, 11:13:50 AM, you wrote:
I don't know. How do you logon. Do you use any secure login types. I
use plain log-ins and don't have a problem with any of the 2.11
versions.
Plain log-in
There's a new service release that you could try, i.e.,
v2.11.02
Yes, I
Hello Phil,
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004 10:16:49 +0100 GMT (04/06/2004, 16:16 +0700 GMT),
Phil wrote:
P I upgraded from 2.10.03 to 2.11 and everything seemed OK until I
P rebooted my machine. From this point onwards I was unable to connect
P to my ISP's IMAP server to read mail.
Do you use a firewall
Hi The Bat! Users,
Ever since using IMAP, I've had a inconsistent problem with sending
mail.
When I finish composing my mail, I hit send. This then sends the
mail to my outbox and it goes no further, well, normally. 1 in 10 it'll
send, but the others it won't.
The mails it won't send I try
Chris Weaven, [CW] wrote:
CW Anyone any ideas why this is happening, as it's VERY frustrating!
CW Would it have anything to do with both my outbox and sent items
CW being server side?
It may very well do. Would you try sending mail with your outbox
local? I can send without trouble only when the
Hi List,
At the request of the list moderators (because of x-header conflicts with this list's
software), I had to change the email address I used for the list, my only alternative
being to one that only supported IMAP. This was quite a pain, because TB! did not
auto-filter incoming IMAP mail
on IMAP
and POP3 and I'm using the same filters (obviously using the different
folders for different connections) and they work perfectly on POP3, but
do nothing on IMAP!?
At least manual filtering does not cause the message base corruption
problems I experienced with earlier versions. Instead
Hello Christopher,
Wednesday, June 2, 2004, 12:04:14 PM, you wrote:
I am disappointed. My filters still don't work. Nothing seems to
happen automatically.
Interestingly, automatic refiltering was working reasonably well for
me on Beta 6 (aside from the fact that folders into which messages
Hi Christopher others,
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
CB ...But the message is NOT moved to the destination folder. It
CB simply stays where it is, and is not marked as read.
Yes can confirm filtering is still not working properly in v2.11 IMAP.
Although messages filtered from my IMAP
Hello Allie,
it's weird i have tb! installed for imap on both my desktop and laptop
and both give the same problem. Any suggestions on how to fix? Perhaps
if I download the latest beta (what's the url?)
Andrew
Friday, May 21, 2004, 3:31:26 AM, you wrote:
AM Andrew, [A] wrote:
A Ok firstly
ETM wrote:
I do not understand IMAP and so am at a decided disadvantage
right now.
You're now leaving and sorting mail on the IMAP server. You download
locally what you need with the option to or not to cache what you've
downloaded. The advantage of this arrangement is that you can fireup
Andrew wrote:
it's weird i have tb! installed for imap on both my desktop and laptop
and both give the same problem. Any suggestions on how to fix? Perhaps
if I download the latest beta (what's the url?)
Information on how to join the beta list and how to download betas are
all provided via
I do not understand IMAP and so am at a decided disadvantage
right now. I like TB! and want to use it while considering
a trial AOL subscription. I would not, under any
circumstances, consider AOL if I had to use its mail
program.
I have been successful in setting up IMAP in Outlook
Express. I
Hello there,
I've just noticed a nice feature in Thunderbird that I've not seen or am
not aware of in TB! When I right click on a folder and look at 'Quota',
I can see my usage and status for the space available in IMAP on the
server compared to what I'm using.
Is this or something similar
Hello tbudl,
Ok firstly auto filtering still doesn't work is that correct?
Secondly after upgrading to 2.10.03 attachments can't be opened. When
I view my imap folders using Mozilla Thunderbird (which I briefly
thought might be better than TB! at IMAP) it can open and save the
attachments
Andrew, [A] wrote:
A Ok firstly auto filtering still doesn't work is that correct?
Not yet, but it's being worked on. Hopefully it'll be up and working
reliably soon.
A Secondly after upgrading to 2.10.03 attachments can't be opened.
A When I view my imap folders using Mozilla Thunderbird
Kevin J. Menard, Jr. wrote:
Yes, but the problem is, some messages are read and others are not. So
I'm not really looking for an all or nothing solution. Oh well, guess
I'll have to cope with it.
Couldn't you use Allie's suggestion, but export all unread messages
first (filter before
Christopher Brown wrote:
Sometimes when I click on a message, it takes several seconds for
the body to be displayed. I assume this is due to latency with
connecting to the IMAP server. My question is, doesn't TB! have a
local copy? Why the delay?
You need to check the option of downloading
Christopher Brown, [CB] wrote:
CB Sometimes when I click on a message, it takes several seconds for
CB the body to be displayed. I assume this is due to latency with
CB connecting to the IMAP server. My question is, doesn't TB! have a
CB local copy? Why the delay?
If there's a delay downloading
Hi List,
Sometimes when I click on a message, it takes several seconds for the body to be
displayed. I assume this is due to latency with connecting to the IMAP server. My
question is, doesn't TB! have a local copy? Why the delay?
--
Chris
Using The Bat! v2.10.03 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build
Hi,
Has anyone here been able to copy their messages from an old POP
account to an IMAP server? I can't seem to be able to do it. I tried
when tb! 2.0 first came out, and couldn't get it to work, so I filed a
bug report, which was then closed saying that it works. But if I go to
my old POP
Kevin J. Menard, Jr., [KJM] wrote:
KJM Anyway, I have about 1,500 emails that I would like to put on my
KJM IMAP server so I can access them from anywhere. If anyone has any
KJM hints on how to get this done, please let me know.
I suggest trying an export and import operation. Another option
701 - 800 of 1376 matches
Mail list logo
