DAVEH: LOLHow can anybody misspell g's name! ;-)
Ooops.sorry for the lack of substance in this post, JD.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your only point of substance in this last response was the shame
you placed on me for misspelling
Gary's name. I continue to
DAVEH: To which TTer are you referring, g.. :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what?you
envision afellowship with no warmth?
--
~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find
DAVEH: Apparently many TTers want me to teach LDS theology on
TT, yet some wish to criticize me for complying with their wishes.
Seems like a no win situation, eh Lance.
Lance Muir wrote:
Apparently there exists a 'collective' anticipation of your answer.
Yes, I am interested as
We can talk about our experiences in the "Puppet ministry"
Going to the Indy 500 Kevin?
DAVEH: For what reason should I explain why/where you are wrong about
my beliefs, Perry. I don't mind explaining to those who really want to
know what I believe, but in your case it seems your intention is to
denigrate my beliefs.
You've stated that your mission (so to speak) is to
DAVEH: FWIW.I agree with what you explained below, Blaine. But
I've always thought LDS theology allows that Adam was a God in the
pre-mortal existence, inasmuch as he was one of the key players (as you
indicated below) who sat in on the planning sessions (so to speak) of
the plan of
On Tue, 24 May 2005 22:44:36 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In you statment below, you initiate
your "discussion" with falsehood -- the claim that I am confused
and you are not. Grade school combat tactics. Just
plain silly. Why did Bill leave -- and
probably Caroline
Shameful? You have got to be kidding JD.
Just what was done to the two from Canada that was shameful?
I'd call the slams against Christine's father and the
continual slurs against her mental ability and character a much greater problem.
What she writes is not taken seriously because she is
Why does the Mormon Church mess with the Bible at
all? May just as well toss it for it loses all credibility in
the light of their prophetical voices and other
teachings. This stuff is occult. jt
On Tue, 24 May 2005 21:13:40 -0700 (PDT) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Blaine
Blaine scripture teaches nothing about any
pre-existence so it is all a figment of someone's imagination. The Bible says
the hidden things
belong to the Lord but what has been revealed is for
the Lord's people and their children... and what is revealed says there is just
ONE God. jt
On
Planning sessions? Tell me you are kidding DaveH
... Like God is a committee and needs input? Also my Bible says that the
Holy Spirit is the executor of the will of the Father and the Word who became
the Son. jt
On Wed, 25 May 2005 00:06:20 -0700 Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you interpret being asked to answer a few questions
about your doctrine as "being asked to teach" DaveH?
I'd call that a bit of a leap ... jt
On Tue, 24 May 2005 23:17:01 -0700 Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DAVEH: Apparently many TTers want me to teach LDS theology
on TT, yet
I understand that monies owed the US total 3 trillion. The 'debt' owed the
US by Europe, Canada and, many other parts of the globe for it's aid in both
dollars and lives is incalculable. This issue though connected, needs to be
evaluated separately from the current state of affairs in your
Sometimes, wisely, churches conduct exit
interviews. It is your forum. I, for one, would appreciate hearing from the
departed and the nearly-departed on this. Would you welcome such?
- Original Message -
From:
David Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May
For any 'line-crossing' on my part as to the
Miller's deux, I acknowledge so doing and, I apoligize. I shall have a word with
myself on the matter of excess.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
They don't because their 'prophet' did
not.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 25, 2005 05:03
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] mormon
angels. was: Dave uses Socratic Method of
Some, holding to a differing interpretation than your own, actually believe
that the scriptures do so teach. I do not count myself among that number.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent:
And that would demonstrate...?
- Original Message -
From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 24, 2005 19:44
Subject: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] What is sin
I'm betting two to one that Christine outlasts Debbie and Caroline
Izzy proclaims triumphally ' we could have nuked
them all'. Please let us know should you find yourself in a decision making
capacity with regard such.
You slipped out of commenting on 'Korea, Viet Nam,
Beirut and Somalia'. Other than a retort, do you wish to address each? Comparing
these
Yes we expect about 30 preachers
Very large crowds to preach to.Parade sat, battle zone saturday night race crowd Sunday.Ruben Israel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We can talk about our experiences in the "Puppet ministry"
Going to the Indy 500 Kevin?
Who is Adam?
LDS say he is the "ancient of days"
The std works says he is the one who sits on the throne.
Adam godDave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DAVEH: FWIW.I agree with what you explained below, Blaine. But I've always thought LDS theology allows that Adam was a God in the pre-mortal
LDS today, do not teach Adam-God and call it a theory in spite of brigham calling it a doctrine.
They refuse to acknowledge it was ever tasught. Many offshoots have left the church over this doctrine, called fundamentalists because they believe Adam-god is a fundamental of the mormon faith. So LDS
Maybe Brigham was being a little vague in referring to him as a "God," but he definitely was our father, and, in a sense, our God, in that he was the first man, and the progenitor of all of us.
Blaine says Adam is "our God"
WOW
Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Blaine scripture teaches
And Satan was a committee member!
http://scriptures.lds.org/abr/4
2626And the Gods took counsel among themselves
Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Planning sessions? Tell me you are kidding DaveH ... Like God is a committee and needs input? Also my Bible says that the Holy Spirit is the
"The President of the Church is the only man on earth authorized by God to go beyond or add to the scriptures" Teachings of theLiving ProphetsP18 published CJCLDS 1982
Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They don't because their 'prophet' did not.
- Original Message -
From: Judy
She is more resilient!Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And that would demonstrate...?- Original Message - From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Sent: May 24, 2005 19:44Subject: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] What is sin I'm betting
This is what I found to be the case many years ago.
I should like to hear from the resident Mormons on this, with
clarity.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 25, 2005 07:47
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] mormon
I await the 'exit interviews'.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 25, 2005 08:04
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] Re:
[Bulk] [TruthTalk] What is sin
She is more resilient!Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave Hansen wrote:
DAVEH: LOLHow can anybody misspell g's name! ;-)
Ooops.sorry for the lack of substance in this post, JD.
We all
mizsepll words at times. I even spelled "of" as "uv" once. It is
John wrote:
dicussions never begin with personal
attacks, well meaning or not.
I don't think pointing out doubt concerning the reality of the kingdom of
God being here is a personal attack.
John wrote:
You did not contrast me and biblical application;
you contrasted me and the reality of
John wrote:
I am surprised at your affiliation with the
Cof C (non-instrument?.
Yes, non-instrument.
John wrote:
There is absolutely nothing that you have written that would
be allowed in that sect. Jopefully you are beginning to settle
down a bit and take root somewhere.
Well, this was
Kevin wrote:
I fail to see what your example of Angels has
to do with God having a body, anymore than
using an amoeba as an example.If angels have bodies, and
angels are invisible, then the Biblical statement that God is invisible says
nothing about whether or not he has a body. Do you
Too much good 'stuff' by BOTH participants in this conversation to respond
to in detail (time).
1. David: did you just 'plant' a 'church'? What is your office in that
'church'?
2. Can ONLY apostles 'plant' churches?
3. I believe that all should pray God's blessing on both enterprises.
(forgive
DaveH wrote:
Apparently many TTers want me to teach LDS theology on
TT, yet some wish to criticize me for complying with their wishes.
Seems like a no win situation, eh Lance.
Let me clarify yet again what TruthTalk is all about and Dave Hansen's
situation in regards to this forum.
TruthTalk
Lance wrote:
I, for one,
would appreciate hearing from the departed
and the nearly-departed on this. Would you
welcome such?
Yes,
I sure would welcome such. I suspect most of the answers would involve
time constraints. TruthTalk has too many posts for active people to keep
up. I have
An amen from me on this.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 25, 2005 09:09
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] mormon angels. was: Dave uses
Socratic Method of Teaching LDS doctrine on TT
DaveH wrote:
This exemplifies 'open structured thinking'. The Spirit of God enables such.
John is exhibiting this through his recent encounter with the 'recovery of
the Trinity'.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 25, 2005 08:53
Dave, I don't mind if you choose not to answer, but no need to whine about
it. If you and I are through discussing things on TT, then so be it. You
said if I want to know what mormons believe, then I sould ask a mormon. I
did that, but he has no answer for me. Who should I turn to for the truth
And also with you. I shall ask Caroline, Debbie,
Jonathan, Bill and, Slade if they'd be open to the 'interview'. Why'd y'all
leave?
- Original Message -
From:
David Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 25, 2005 09:14
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:
DAVEH: Thanx for your clarification. To me it remains a no win
situation when it is implied that I am a liar for responding to
questions about my beliefs.
David Miller wrote:
I would not say
that it is a "no win situation" just because a person's viewpoint is
criticized in this forum.
David, Dave is smarter than you are giving him credit for being. He knows
what he is doing. He is playing a word game. I have no problem with him
pushing his mormon views into the discussions here...I just want him to
acknowledge that is what he is doing. He is intentionally misinterpreting
Dave,
I wanted to add that, although you are whining about answerig my
question, and doing everything except answering it, it has served it's
secondary purpose, and that is to expose and stimulate discussion on the
non-biblical and heretical aspects of mormon beliefs. In the meantime, my
Kevin wrote:
FATHER ADAM OUR GOD Brigham Young, in a sermon in the
tabernacle in Salt Lake City on April 9, 1852, said:
When our Father Adam came into the garden of Eden, he
came into it WITH A CELESTIAL BODY, and brought Eve,
one of his wives, with him. He helped to make and
organize this world.
DAVEH: No Judy, I do not. But effectively that is what it is in a
sense. And it is certainly taken as such by some TTers, who evidently
view my explanations as an effort to try to convert TTers to
Mormonism. From my perspective, the problem is the accusation that I
am dishonest about my
DAVEH: No JudyI am not kidding, though I may have chosen better
words (counsel) to describe it.
When God spoke as recorded in Genesis (1:26), he seemed to be
discussing the creation with others..
And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our
likeness:.
...I believe
The Genesis and Job comments are supported by some
commentators.
- Original Message -
From:
Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 25, 2005 10:29
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] mormon
angels. was: Dave uses Socratic Method of Teaching LDS...
I, for one, am pleased to hear fully and candidly
from Mr. Hansen.
- Original Message -
From:
Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 25, 2005 10:05
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] mormon angels. was: Dave uses Socratic Method of
Dave Hansen wrote:
To me it remains a no win situation when it is implied
that I am a liar for responding to questions about my beliefs.
From my perspective, if a member implies you are a liar for responding to
questions about your belief, that member is mistaken. You have made your
case,
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fond Farewells- Salvation
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 11:37:02 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
Perry wrote:
David, Dave is smarter than you are giving him
credit for being. He knows what he is doing.
He is playing a word game.
Well, maybe I have fallen into his trap, but it does seem to me that you
have put him in an awkward position. If he answers you, then you will
likely use that
David, and Dave,
Dave states that he is not here [on TT] to learn the truth...he is here
to learn what protestants think, and why. While not part of his pat
statement about why he is on TT, he also said that he is not here tio
convert anyone to mormonism or to teach mormonism.
I believe
Blaine wrote:
... it came through to me that she was one of my
immediate ancestors, a woman born in Norway,
who had been active in converting her husband and
family to Mormonism, and that she was there to show
her approval of what we were in process of doing.
Blaine, I appreciate you sharing
There was a significant word game going on whenI first arrived on this forum. LDS using words that seemed intended to cloak the true LDS understanding.
I think the christians here have a far better understanding of mormonism now then in past years
There are words that are familiar to christians
It is amazing how backwards LDS can get things.
Angel of light introduces Joe to becoming a god
The fall is a fall upward.
A sacrifice of fruit on the altar http://www.helpingmormons.org/TLC_Manti/PhotoAlbum/Other%20Photos/Adam%20and%20Eve%20Sacrifice.html
Maybe joes tutor introduced the Adam god
http://www.towertotruth.net/Mormon/witnessing/terminology.htm
What a wakeup call. I followed this link and found
this:
JESUS CHRIST:
LDS--A created being, the first spirit child of Elohim
and one of his wives, the spirit brother of Lucifer
the devil.
So Jesus and Satan are BROTHERS? I thought
Christine:Please! One need not disregard the Bible to believe anything. One
need only disregard your interpretation. What you find to be the plain
meaning of something is not necessarily what another thoughtful believe
might find. Agreed?
- Original Message -
From: Christine Miller
evidently view my explanations as an effort to try to convert TTers to Mormonism
Like who?
Can you post a quote showing this?
I think your smoke screen has gotten away with you it is in your eyes now.
Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DAVEH: No Judy, I do not. But effectively that is what it is
What is the rest of the story Dave?
Which led to those spirits that were less valiant were cursed with a BLACK SKIN
You left that out Dave!
THE SEED OF CAIN: "were more valiant than others
Those who were less valiant in pre-existence and who thereby had certain spiritual restrictions imposed upon
To name just one, Bart Ehrman
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 25, 2005 13:19
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] mormon angels. was: Dave uses Socratic Method of Teaching
LDS...
Who?Lance Muir
Who?Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Genesis and Job comments are supported by some commentators.
- Original Message -
From: Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 25, 2005 10:29
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] mormon angels. was: Dave uses Socratic Method of
Again, this Mormon doctrine echoes Jewish thought. The
Midrash Rabbah comments on Genesis 1:26 by not only
asserting that the us is a council, but by going so
far as to discribe the conversation that proceeded the
creation of man:
When the Holy One, Blessed be He, was about to create
Adam, the
So you believe angels are departed human
beings? Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 8:19
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Dave uses
Socratic Method of Teaching LDS doctrine
Yes, I do see your point and I do agree. But the Bible
speaks to be understood, and it is written to inform
us. We must interpret, that's true, just as I must
interpret your post when I read it.
The Bible is very clear on what it means to be a child
of God and a brother of Jesus. It requires
Exactly right, jt. When one has
blinders on how do they see? (Or is it logs?) Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 2:57
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject:
I meant a christian not a proto OrthLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To name just one, Bart Ehrman
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 25, 2005 13:19
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] mormon angels. was: Dave uses Socratic
Are you enjoying your politically irrelevant rants Lance? First you say we
should forgive all debts against the USA, then you make remarks that we are
going to go bankrupt because of the debts, etc. The Bible says lend and do
not ask in return. That's basically what we do. We don't worry about.
The constant slurs such as grade
school tactics.your PhD and all.I am better than you.
Who is looking childish here? Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 2:51
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc:
Perhaps asking the Lord to give you a new
heart would be even better? (Sin is sin, excessive or not.) Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 5:09
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk]
America hutzpa! J
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Deegan
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 6:05
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] Re:
[Bulk] [TruthTalk] What is sin
She is more resilient!
Lance Muir
[EMAIL
Just be glad Im not in control of
the black box on a big PMS day. J Beirut
and Somalia
were not wars the last I heardjust terrorists acting normal for
themselves. (Funny how they dont bother Canada; I wonder why they like you
so much?) Korea and VietNam were
called on account of getting
And who were you expecting to exit?
Iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 6:19
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] RE:
[Bulk] Re: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] What is sin
I await the
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 6:25
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fond
Farewells- Salvation
Dave Hansen wrote:
DAVEH: LOLHow can anybody misspell
g's name!
So do I.
- Original Message -
From: Christine Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 25, 2005 14:42
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] mormon angels. was:
Dave uses Socratic Method of Teaching LDS doctrine on TT
Yes, I do see your point
Who said you're not discerning? Whoops, that'd be
me. Now I need to take it back.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 25, 2005 14:49
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] mormon angels. was: Dave
Yes, I am. Thanks for asking.
- Original Message -
From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 25, 2005 14:49
Subject: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] What is sin
Are you enjoying your politically irrelevant rants Lance? First
Lance what are you referring to by this? Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 7:17 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fond Farewells- Salvation
This
That is what i have been trying to tell them for years!
By the way yes it is shocking isn't it.Christine Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.towertotruth.net/Mormon/witnessing/terminology.htmWhat a wakeup call. I followed this link and foundthis:JESUS CHRIST:LDS--A created being, the first
Do you ever think before writing? Sorry, that's a
rhetorical question.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 25, 2005 14:55
Subject: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] [TruthTalk]
What is sin
Perhaps asking the
Lord to give
You 'feebed' out on this but, we'll give you a pass
bein' tired and all.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 25, 2005 14:57
Subject: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] RE:
[Bulk] RE: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk]
YOU, for the 4th or 5th time!
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 25, 2005 14:58
Subject: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] RE:
[Bulk] Re: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] What is sin
And who were you
expecting to exit? Iz
Enjoy yourself.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 1:10 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] What is sin
Yes, I am. Thanks for asking.
What you find to be the plain meaning of something is not necessarily what another thoughtful believe might find.
It is a lie that you teach.
You may not have a clue what is true, but rest assured through the promise revelation of Jesus Christ, we can know the TRUTH.
I know the TRUTH when I see
I did think about it. Did you? Did you
apologize for a sin or not? If it was a sin, then being excessive
about it or not is irrelevant. A sinless heart does not treat a young lady
shamefully. My point is not to shame you, but to point out that the solution
is to seek a sinless walk in
Bingo! Departed Ressurected "gods"
Just waiting on their bodies.
Oh where o where can my Body be?
My Body lies over the ocean?ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So you believe angels are departed human beings? Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sorry youre tired. Have a nice
nap. Iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 1:12
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] RE:
[Bulk] RE: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk]
Im just like a bad penny.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 1:13
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] Re:
[Bulk] RE: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] What is sin
YOU, for the
According to Lance's Narnia Theory of Interpretation and Post Modern Biblical Relativism, we can never really know what Lanceis trying to communicate!Christine Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I do see your point and I do agree. But the Biblespeaks to be understood, and it is written to
If it was not for the US Lance would be speaking the Dutch right now!
Heil Left Wing Ideolog'sShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you enjoying your politically irrelevant rants Lance? First you say weshould forgive all debts against the USA, then you make remarks that we aregoing to go
Wise in your own conceit? Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you ever think before writing? Sorry, that's a rhetorical question.
- Original Message -
From: ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 25, 2005 14:55
Subject: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] What is
Ask a Mormon.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 25, 2005 15:28
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] mormon angels. was: Dave uses Socratic Method of Teaching LDS
doctrine on TT
What you
That's apparent.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 25, 2005 15:32
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] mormon angels. was: Dave uses Socratic Method of Teaching LDS
doctrine on TT
In which branch did you serve?
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 25, 2005 15:34
Subject: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:
[Bulk] [TruthTalk] What is sin
If it was not for the US Lance would be speaking the
If the young lady can't stand the heat (she can by
the way) then she'd be wise to depart the kitchen (she didn't). Like
'sweetface', she's in the process of getting an education. One day she'll hang
out her 'shingle' and charge big bucks for knowing stuff other people don't. YOU
ought to be
Do you think it is possible to know the truth from the
Word, Lance? And if so, don't we have a responsibility
to that truth?
Blessings!
--- Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's apparent.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Yes yes.
Don't YOU think it is possible that some who KNOW the Truth (Jesus)
articulate the truth (scripture) incorrectly? What's the deal with that?
- Original Message -
From: Christine Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 25, 2005 16:08
Subject: [Bulk]
What is it with this "PhD" thing you got going on, Izzy. Over the past, say, five months -- how many tinmes have I mentioned it? Threetimes, or four ?? The last time was to set up the fact that David is eduacted and, therefore, able to carry on discussions without first becoming personal. Nothing
Yes and that thoughtful believer just might be you, Christine !! Have you ever changed your mind
in regards to the meaning of a particular passage? Of course you have. How do you know, then, that
what you now accept is not due for change sometime in the future? Answer: you don't. This is
Would this includemy previously happy ex wife?
JD-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 25 May 2005 13:41:18 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Dave uses Socratic Method of Teaching LDS doctrine on TT
So you believe angels are
Good illustration. Tell us of your experience with blinders. Inquiring minds ---Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 25 May 2005 13:47:17 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] What is sin
Exactly right, jt. When one has blinders on
Good idea -- if their comments are accepted by the opposition. Otherwise, it will the very waste of timethey thought to excape --- I imagine. I'm all ears..
JD-Original Message-From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 25 May 2005 09:23:57 -0400Subject:
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo