Probability now at 35% based on allegations of what I consider to be fraud
from a partner.
http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/2014/11/24/probability-now-35-based-on-allegations-of-fraud/
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
Blaze exhibits his
I am decreasign my ASSessment of an ASSurance that Blaze will pull his
head out of his ASinine hind quarters from 6.59% down to 6.4%. SSDD from
Blaze.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Probability now at 35% based on allegations of what I
http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/2014/10/09/probability-is-now-45/
Based on http://www.nyteknik.se/asikter/debatt/article3854541.ece
Exciting times!
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/2014/10/08/probability-now-20/
Blaze exhibits his wishy-washiness yet again. He also doesn't follow his
own posted criteria, which was that if the report came out after
September he would lower the probability to 25%, which he never did. He
went straight to 20% yesterday and today he's at 45%. Because of ONE
reaction to the
http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/2014/10/08/probability-now-20/
Disappointed to see the same names at the top of the paper.Shocked to
see not even Arxiv will accept it. I will increase the probability if
does make it onto Arxiv or if we see IH and Cherokee step up.
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at
http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/2014/06/29/probability-is-now-27/
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/2014/06/24/probability-rossi-is-real-is-now-28/
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:44 PM, John Berry
Blaze:
Pull your head out. Your blog isn't even up on the internet.
Post her on Vortex -l or risk being continually ignored.
Why did you stop posting anyways?
Server not found
Firefox can't find the server at rossiisreal.wordpress.com.
Check the address for typing errors such as
Post her on Vortex -l or risk being continually ignored.
typo alert
Post her*e* on Vortex -l or risk being continually ignored.
I am able to get to the sites on Chrome.
Looks like his site is back up.
What a bunch of horse manure.
Probability is now 27%
http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/2014/06/29/probability-is-now-27/
Leave a reply
http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/2014/06/29/probability-is-now-27/#respond
More delays
Kevin, I think you failed to account for CME and sunspot activity being
very low.
Elevated sunspot activity is related to aberrant behavior.
This will reduce the odds of a sudden reASSesment by Blaze down another
0.013% down to 7.077%
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Kevin O'Malley
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:51 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin, I think you failed to account for CME and sunspot activity being
very low.
Elevated sunspot activity is related to aberrant behavior.
This will reduce the odds of a sudden reASSesment by Blaze down another
0.013%
Kevin, let me fill you in on a secret of making high precision ASSesments.
If you are going to pull figures from your ass, you can make them as many
decimal places as you like limited by a factor or 3 things.
#1 How unchecked you have let your ego grow.
#2 How Cheek-y you are.
#3 How big an ass
So... in blaze's case:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 2:22 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin, let me fill you in on a secret of making high precision ASSesments.
If you are going to pull figures from your ass, you can make them as many
decimal places as you like limited by a
http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/2014/06/24/probability-rossi-is-real-is-now-28/
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:44 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Well I worded that strongly to drive home a point, we often hide our
ignorance in the talk of probability.
There are 4 domains in
So now Blaze won't even post on his own thread, instead posting to his own
blog about rumors
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/06/20/e-cat-report-watch-thread/ of delay
around the next ITP report...
Rumors? The damned report was due in April. That ain't no rumor. It is
delayed. I'm constrained to
In the article at ECat World... Blaze is the crow.
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/06/18/lenr-simplified-pencils-windmills-and-super-mario/
LENR Simplified: Pencils, Windmills and Super Mario
Posted on June 18, 2014 by admin http://www.e-catworld.com/author/admin/
• 15 Comments
Nice recall Harry!
From: H Veeder [mailto:hveeder...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 9:11 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards,
to 35%
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Terry Blanton
hohlr...@gmail.commailto:hohlr
There is a big difference between a certain physical process being valid
and the commercial viability of a product based on that process.
Just because a spark will explode gasoline vapor does not imply that a
Lamborghini can be designed to use that principle or that the car will sell
in the
That's why I coupled the two probabilities upthread. Did you read the
thread?
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg93531.html
Let's say you think there's a 66% chance that Rossi's real and a 50%
chance that CYPW will be in the right commercial place to take advantage.
That means
From ECAT World
Rossi on His Anxiety Over E-Cat Test Results
Posted on June 9, 2014 by admin http://www.e-catworld.com/author/admin/ • 62
Comments
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/06/09/rossi-on-his-anxiety-over-e-cat-test-results/#comments
Yes, but just because there are some things that are real but not very
commercially viable, and just because in our ignorance we may be unable to
say if it is commercially viable or not does not change the fact of what it
is.
It either is real and useful, real and useless to some degree and
[mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 2:30 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards,
to 35%
There is a big difference between a certain physical process being valid and
the commercial viability of a product based on that process
: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards,
to 35%
Kevin, I can only assume you have misunderstood what I was saying.
Earlier you said: Not even Pons Fleischmann can lay claim to having found the
effect.
Which sound to me something like the great (not even) PF can't claim
look larger and
therby more vp pass thru accelerating/catalyzing what we pewrceive as
shrunken hydrogen.
*From:* John Berry [mailto:berry.joh...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, June 10, 2014 12:54 AM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being
what we pewrceive as
shrunken hydrogen.
*From:* John Berry [mailto:berry.joh...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, June 10, 2014 12:54 AM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real
upwards, to 35%
Kevin, I can only assume you have
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:09 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Axil, I think you need to add ether or aether to your spell check
dictionary.
Either or both, but not neither or you end up with 'either' ;)
Or 'aeither'. :-)
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:09 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Axil, I think you need to add ether or aether to your spell check
dictionary.
Either or both, but not neither or you end up with 'either' ;)
1: There is no such things as probability, things either happen or they
don't. Rossi either IS real, or he is NOT real..
There is no such thing as probability in reality.
I see..
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 5:12 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Blaze's ego is astounding, thinking that
I guess what your'e really saying is that God Does Not Play Dice.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
1: There is no such things as probability, things either happen or they
don't. Rossi either IS real, or he is NOT real..
There is no such thing as
Well I worded that strongly to drive home a point, we often hide our
ignorance in the talk of probability.
There are 4 domains in which we apply probability.
1: Things which are set and we are ignorant of, no actual element of chance
exist, such as with Rossi.
2: Macro chance, things that we
I believe it is fair to say that in quantum mechanics probabilities
actually exist in the physical sense (assuming the theories are correct).
In the macroscopic world, probabilities do not exist in the same sense that
atoms exist, or energy, or states of matter. Instead, probabilities are
measure
In the macroscopic world, probabilities do not exist in the same sense
that atoms exist, or energy, or states of matter.
I suspect Schrodinger's cat would disagree with this statement. The
microscopic significantly influences the macroscopic world.
The eCat is a perfect example of this.
Blaze, a fine verbal joust.
But you must admit it is not even close to reality.
Now you are engaging in a factious argument, Rossi and his eCat are not
wave functions yet to be collapsed.
Good comedy, but if I were to take you at your word, I would consider you
needing to be picked up by some
Everything in the universe is a wave function waiting to be collapsed.
This is how the universal simulator avoids pointless CPU processing.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:59 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Blaze, a fine verbal joust.
But you must admit it is not even close to reality.
Wrong.
Rossi has either found a real effect, or he hasn't.
If he hasn't, then we can assume that there is no way to get results just
like he claimed in the fashion he claimed.
It would be odd to say the least to propose that he is faking something
that could be made to work with a tiny tweak.
Rossi has either found a real effect, or he hasn't.
***Nope. Not even Pons Fleischmann can lay claim to having found the
effect. What Rossi found was a way to get more consistent replications by
separating out H2 gas into monoatomic hydrogen gas before it gets loaded
into a nickel chamber.
You are back at he level of human ignorance though.
Sure, maybe Rossi doesn't know for sure his effect is really overunity.
Maybe he doesn't know it is extraordinary.
Or just some false positive.
BUT the effect is either real, or not real.
It doesn't have a chance one way or the other then
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe it is fair to say that in quantum mechanics probabilities
actually exist in the physical sense (assuming the theories are correct).
This is the predominant interpretation of quantum mechanics, but one that
is
The de Broglie-Bohm theory is now considered by some to be a valid
challenge to the prevailing orthodoxy of the Copenhagen Interpretation, but
it remains controversial. It is both realistic and deterministic and has
nothing to do with probability. It has no implications for multiple
universes and
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:14 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
You are back at he level of human ignorance though.
***What does such an expression even mean? You could easily claim it means
so many different things. In context, it appears that you think I'm saying
Rossi is ignorant,
Kevin, I can only assume you have misunderstood what I was saying.
Earlier you said: Not even Pons Fleischmann can lay claim to having found
the effect.
Which sound to me something like the great (not even) PF can't claim they
definitively had a real effect, so Neither can Rossi be rightly
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:53 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin, I can only assume you have misunderstood what I was saying.
Earlier you said: Not even Pons Fleischmann can lay claim to having
found the effect.
Which sound to me something like the great (not even) PF can't
Kevin, I can only assume you have misunderstood what I was saying.
***It would appear that you misunderstood what I was saying.
Going to start publishing updates on this blog
http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/ rather than this mailing list.
Rossi is now at 30%
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
If it's interesting enough to generate a patent then it is worthwhile.
The world would
I'm constrained to decrease my ASSessment of an ASSurance
that Blaze will pull his head out of his ASinine hind quarters down to
7.51%, taking into account the direction of the wind and the stock
price for CYPW Cyclone Power.
At least this time Blaze increased the chances of Rossi being real
on
Blaze's ego is astounding, thinking that he has things so well worked out
that his ramblings about probability have meaning.
Even if he were that good at working out probability, a few facts remain
that make it worthless.
1: There is no such things as probability, things either happen or they
The E-Cat has no threshold for irrelevance. In terms of probability, the
E-Cat is like a civilization killing asteroid impact on the earth. Even if
there is only a 1 in ten million chance that the E-Cat is a viable paradigm
changing energy device, its mass adoption will have catastrophic
Put a gun to my head with 10,000,000 chambers and a bullet in only one of
them selected at random and offer me $100 every time I pull the trigger, I
would pull that trigger a number of times.
Why? Well obviously I could use the money, and more-so the risk of dying
from getting in a car to go to
Oh, and you are more likely to die from an infection caught in hospital
than die from all forms of accident combined.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 5:39 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Put a gun to my head with 10,000,000 chambers and a bullet in only one of
them selected at random and
More and more I'm beginning to wonder if we're going to get a TIP report
that shows something interesting, but nowhere guaranteeing the power
densities shown in the first report.
While I believe that Rossi believes he has something and that IH believes
they have something and that there is no
Another possibility is IH may have decided they don't want the world
competing with them, so they gave the researchers an eCat which is just
enough interesting to generate a patent but not so interesting it causes
the world to sit up and take notice.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Blaze
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
More and more I'm beginning to wonder if we're going to get a TIP report
that shows something interesting, but nowhere guaranteeing the power
densities shown in the first report.
While I believe that Rossi
Geez, Blaze. If you're gonna post such wishy-washy stuff, you should just
post it on a new thread instead of a thread where you've been heavily
criticized for ignoring posts directly to you, for abandoning such a
thread, and a thread where such a post simply makes you look like you're as
If it's interesting enough to generate a patent then it is worthwhile. The
world would sit up and take notice simply because Rossi ain't a fraud, as
the common notion suggests.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Another possibility is IH may have
Revising my estimate that Blaze will pull it out down to 10%. Perhaps he
has some realness in him, but my estimates show my doubts. My increasing
doubts.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes, let the anger flow through you, my apprentice. It
Oops, that should be 9% chance that Blaze will pull his head out of his
rear end, thereby performing a cephalorectomy. I had already gotten down
to 10%. Oh well, might as well be as arbitrary as he has been.
Breathe, Blaze Vader. The dark side of the force is with you. Come to the
dark side;
Decreasing the probability to 31% based on smelly stock offering.
http://freeenergyscams.com/andrea-rossi-e-cat-hydro-fusion-cashing-in-before-the-collapse/
HydroFusion is ran by Dr. Magnus Holm. Seems credible - but why didn't he
wait until after the report to ask for more money? Why is Rossi
I am decreasing the probability of Blaze pulling his head out of his ass
down to 11%. He logs onto his own thread without reading it and responding
to posts directly for him. He generates his own probabilities often on
things that have nothing to do with Rossi, and doesn't define what being
Kevin, if you want to invest .. why not HydroFusion? Looks to be the best
option.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
I am decreasing the probability of Blaze pulling his head out of his ass
down to 11%. He logs onto his own thread without reading it
Because I invested already. No thanks to you and your idiotic responses on
this thread.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
Kevin, if you want to invest .. why not HydroFusion? Looks to be the best
option.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7:42 PM,
Revising my estimate that Blaze will pull it out down to 10%. Based upon
his previous posts, his response on this thread when directly challenged,
his responses on other threads which he brings over here as if it meant
something, and his initial 10:1 odds that he reneged on.
On Wed, May 21,
Yes, let the anger flow through you, my apprentice. It will make you
powerful.
Anyways, no need to get stressed - whatever happens, I guarantee it will be
exciting.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
Revising my estimate that Blaze will pull it out
CYPW is even cheaper today, closing at 0.009 cents. If they stay below a
penny, they'll get downgraded to the pink sheets AFAIK. This is a rare
chance for LENR aficianados to put a little bit of money down with the
possibility of Black Swan Level gains and support LENR at the same time.
With the
Here's an old discussion I had on an intrade board about the probability
of Rossi being real
http://intrade.freeforums.org/i-miss-intrade-t29.html
Re: I miss Intradehttp://intrade.freeforums.org/i-miss-intrade-t29.html#p138
[image: Post] http://intrade.freeforums.org/post138.html#p138by
Cold Fusion exists for PdD. What is not proven is NiH fusion.
2014-05-18 3:46 GMT-03:00 Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com:
[image: Boxbe] https://www.boxbe.com/overview This message is eligible
for Automatic Cleanup! (kevmol...@gmail.com) Add cleanup
I suppose that goes right to the heart of what Blaze means by Real. If
PdD fusion were real in his mind, we would have PdD cold fusion reactors
replacing coal plants by the dozen every month, people would be ordering a
cup of Richard Garwin tea from Starbucks, and you could buy a LENR
generator
I've made a short analysis of that announce, and the connections with
LENr-cities/LENR-Cars
http://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/338-LENR-Invest-Fund-I-LLC-raises-205-000-in-May/
I don't have confirmation, but connecting some wire I have an idea of what
is the money for.
Not a huge
Nice Work Alain
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Alain Sepeda
To: Vortex List
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2014 1:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%
I've made a short analysis of that announce, and the connections with
LENr-cities
Then are we now adding the condition that the temperature needs to be above
800C in order to determine that Rossi is real???
We seem to be off the track of that subject. We've been talking about what
is the optimum engine technically to work with a LENR device. My question
is aimed at SWWAT--
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
Then are we now adding the condition that the temperature needs to be above
800C in order to determine that Rossi is real???
I was addressing the question of whether a Stirling engine would be
necessary or useful; I was
The Elforsk test gives me, personally speaking, sufficient information to
believe that Rossi is probably for real.
***Does that mean you think it's a 51% probability that Rossi is real?
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:27 PM,
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
***Does that mean you think it's a 51% probability that Rossi is real?
I don't know if I can quantify the feeling with so much precision. I'm on
the fence about the underlying premises of prediction markets. Perhaps
From: Kevin O'Malley
…And my question hasn't really been answered -- If Rossi is
determined to be real, wouldn't a stock like CYPW take off? Are there
other public stocks that would skyrocket? Any steam engine stocks?
I think that this is a
Experimental information describing the Ni/H reactor is dammed hard to come
by. With the negativity toward DGT shown by much of the LENR elite, our
best source of this precious info will be cut off for no good reason. What
good does it do for Jed to undercut anyone in this field, especially such a
Sorry Jones, this preceding post was not meant for you, it was miss-posted.
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Experimental information describing the Ni/H reactor is dammed hard to
come by. With the negativity toward DGT shown by much of the LENR elite,
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
***Does that mean you think it's a 51% probability that Rossi is real?
I don't know if I can quantify the feeling with so much precision.
You people know that Kim is doing consulting for CYPW, right? And that its
headquarters are 40min away from Rossi's hom... HQ of Leonardo corporation.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
My problem is that I don't know how to short oil. I agree that this would
be preferential because it is probably far more liquid and one could wait
until the very last minute. For instance, we all know that most of the
world is ignoring LENR news. As soon as that independent report is
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
We have mentioned this company before, going back several years, which
unfortunately has a similar name as the failed Stirling company and may not
be publicly traded - but there are 3-4 others in ORC (and I am a terrible
The problem is... Y.E. Kim appears to have moved forward on data from
Defkalion without verifying that their device works. He could have done
the same thing with Cyclone.
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.comwrote:
You people know that Kim is doing consulting
Cyclone doesn't do CF, they said that on their facebook page. I meant Kim
could be with Rossi.
2014-05-16 15:26 GMT-03:00 Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com:
He could have done the same thing with Cyclone.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
Here's an example of some early-adopter money starting to move into this
space. The problem is, it's not available to just anyone, and in
particular, they already closed it off for this fund.
http://form-d.findthebest.com/l/162985/Lenr-Invest-Fund-I-LLC
Lenr-Invest Fund I, LLC, which is in the
Blaze:
If Rossi turned out to be real, then what do you think would happen to
Stirling Cycle Engine technology? In particular, a company like CYPW would
skyrocket, right?
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
Decreasing probability to 46% based on
From many experts in engine I've heard that stirling engine are not a
realistic solution...
They are popular but don't works well on the field. (hearsay)
Only application seems to be small 1kWmech electric production in CHP. this
may be very usefull anyway for home CHP.
I've heard better about
From many experts in engine I've heard that stirling engine are not a
realistic solution...
They are popular but don't works well on the field. (hearsay)
***Perhaps that is because there hasn't been much money poured into RD for
stirlings. If LENR were to break out of its skeptopathic prison
Cyclone power had it's fashion time, but today they are a penny stock.
Anyway they seems dynamic and competent.
In france about micro-turbine I know Exoes, in scandinavia Climeon...
today they target waste heat.
I maintain a scoop.it on that domain
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.comwrote:
Cyclone power had it's fashion time, but today they are a penny stock.
***All the better. Here is a cheap way LENR afficianados to put our money
where our mouth is. Upside potential is quite high, and the downside
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.comwrote:
From many experts in engine I've heard that stirling engine are not a
realistic solution...
If the temperature of a device approaches 8-900 C, as seen in the Elforsk
test, a simple steam engine should be adequate.
Eric
Luca is the ultimate insider and it reads like only almost an accusation.
What we're seeing here is a continuation of the pattern that has made us so
wary of cold fusion. Bayesian analysis relies on patterns, and the
probability that Rossi will also follow this pattern has just increased
Gamberale told me that the findings he describes in the report could bring
damage to serious research activities within LENR
Sady it have started... the anti-LENr already says that we cannot trust
anything, about E-cat test because of the Milan demo tricks by Defkalion.
It will be a very
probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%
Gamberale told me that the findings he describes in the report could bring
damage to serious research activities within LENR
Sady it have started... the anti-LENr already says that we cannot trust
anything, about E-cat test because
From: Bob Cook
Has anyone heard about the operation of the Rossi unit that was sold to the
Swedish entity for the cost of the heat it produces? Mats Lewan talks about
this event but does not have any follow-up about what happened …
I think he was referring to the Hydrofusion
I agree that your reference is correct. I still wonder if there was/is a
customer of Hydrofusion?
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 8:02 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards
Decreasing the probability to 35% based on shattering news of the Defkalion
demo being completely worthless. I hesitate to say it, but It almost
sounds like fraud is being implied.
http://animpossibleinvention.com/2014/05/12/defkalion-demo-proven-not-to-be-reliable/
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
Decreasing the probability to 35% based on shattering news of the Defkalion
demo being completely worthless. I hesitate to say it, but It almost
sounds like fraud is being implied.
Decreasing probability to 46% based on lack of news from Nanor but up to
47% based on recent news from Darden in China:
http://www.icebank.cn/news/detail_2.php?id=118
hat tip:
An interview from last month by Alex of DGT:
http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2014/01/30/energy-at-less-than-0-01-per-kw-an-interview-with-alex-xanthoulis/
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
You are missing the money. Who will fund this X-prize?
Dick
Smithhttp://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2012/02/24/dick-smith-rossi-e-cat-too-fantastic-to-be-true/
The the Ansari X-Prize was leveraged to the full $10M by what amounted to
a bet
Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
I was impressed with Swartz's presentation on the 5th day of the MIT
lectures series. He seems like a real enthusiastic researcher and inventor
with a very significant invention, although small, based on a LENR
process, whatever it turns out to be,
1 - 100 of 246 matches
Mail list logo
