On 01/03/2010, at 8:44 AM, Sam Dwyer dwyer@abc.net.au wrote:
Hope some of that helps.
(Hi to the mailing list by the way, this is my first post since I
joined, look forward to engaging with you all)
Thanks Sam and welcome, great to get your perspective on TinyMCE, if
you ever do dig
I haven't had much of a look at the new CKEditor version but I was mightily
impressed with the initial glance I had at it when he first released it. It
looks like a *major* improvement on the original fckeditor. Cleaner code, more
accessible and easier, cleaner ability to add plugins. If I was
I work for a small county government and we are working with a developer to
setup a Drupal website. I am of the opinion that the editor can make or
break the utilization of the website by our mostly not very savvy employees.
If it is too hard or creates work then it will not be used or people will
I'd be also be curious to learn more about any editors that can use a site's
CSS. Just spent a day with FCKEditor only to find that there appears to be
no way to have site CSS appear in the Style dropdown, w/o transforming the
CSS into XML.
For about 5 years, I've used InnovaStudio because it
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Kepler Gelotte
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 12:32 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Standards based Drupal WYSIWYG Editor
Just spent a day with FCKEditor only
We make extensive use of TinyMCE with Drupal (we're a Drupal development
shop) - it's not perfect, but it does offer a lot of flexibility
regarding acceptable tags, and we've been able to get it to provide
XHTML compliant code. Combined with filters like Tidy, it's possible to
ensure that you
Sent: 26 February 2010 19:37
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Standards based Drupal WYSIWYG Editor
We make extensive use of TinyMCE with Drupal (we're a Drupal development
shop) - it's not perfect, but it does offer a lot of flexibility regarding
acceptable tags, and we've been able
Hi James,
On 27 February 2010 03:30, James O'Neill freexe...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not at all happy with the FCK editor. I am
starting to look at Time MCE and Standard.
When you say FCK editor do you mean the current version?
Now called CKEditor.
Broadly, I’m very interested to hear
Do you have a link to the information week story?
Nancy
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 9:53 PM, dwain dwain.alf...@gmail.com wrote:
in the april 20th issue of informationweek there is an article about
standards. the title of the article is standards matter - we all want
interoperability, but are
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Nancy Johnson njohnso...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you have a link to the information week story?
Nancy
here's the link:
http://www.informationweek.com/news/infrastructure/management/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=216600011
cheers,
dwain
--
Fear of the devil is
, April 23, 2009 8:21 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] standards matter - an informationweek article
Do you have a link to the information week story?
Nancy
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
Mason
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Nancy Johnson
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 8:21 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] standards matter - an informationweek article
Do you have a link
in the april 20th issue of informationweek there is an article about
standards. the title of the article is standards matter - we all want
interoperability, but are you willing to take vendors to task for breaking
faith?. it was a good industry-wide account of the standards problem. web
Hey WSGers,
While this doesn¹t fall into our normal definition of technical¹ web
standards I am positive meetings like this will help in our endeavour to
define what standards will be necessary in the shifting online community.
Hurry the tour starts Monday!
The Digital Kingmaker is
Dunno, if this has been asked before.
I've been looking wherever I can for a way to get a div's or any
element's background color in a sementic friendly way (ie. works in IE
and FF) using javascript.
so far i've tried the below:
document.getElementById('element').bgColor;
Use window.getComputedStyle for standard-compliant browsers and
element.currentStyle for IE.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/DOM/window.getComputedStyle
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms535231(VS.85).aspx
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:06, Dennis Suitters [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Dunno,
alternative. There's a
perfectly usable free version available and the full version only costs 23 GBP.
Kieren
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [WSG] Standards and Adobe
ContributeDate: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 19:10:36 +1100Hi
Several people are misunderstanding why some of us are challenging
Hi
Several people are misunderstanding why some of us are challenging the
use of Contribute (please note, challenging, not refusing) and why a
consultant might discover (please note: discover, not insist) where a
CMS might be a better solution for the client in the long run and
better
I think that was the point of both myself and Dave, Todd.
Mark's vitriolic rant seemed to miss the point that the technology
comes after you discover what the business requires, what their
resources are, what the requirements of the site will be over the next
12-24 months, etc. not just say
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 5:53 AM, James Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi Guys,
A client wants to use Adobe Contribute for content management.
Is there any point writing standards complient code or will contribute
butcher the code anyway?
Can I use php at all with contribute? Would love to
Hi Guys,
Thank your for your insights and assistance on this topic.
I am taking everyone's opinion into consideration and have received very
usefull help and templates from several people.
James
2008/11/3 Susan Grossman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 5:53 AM, James Farrell [EMAIL
Mark, you seem to misunderstand what Dave and I are saying and maybe
you so angry about something you can't even see you're contradicting
yourself and claiming dave and I are saying different things when your
examples, reflected back at us, clearly show paralell, not conflicting
I'm sorry, Mark, but that is not a winning strategy in business.
As a web developer, you *must* design for maintainability. Anything
else is a disservice to both your business and your customer. The
customer is not always right. The customer hires you because they
perceive you to have
Dave Lane wrote:
I'm sorry, Mark, but that is not a winning strategy in business.
Dave, the business decision is not that of the web designer. While web
design may be his business, it's not the business of his client.
As a web developer, you *must* design for maintainability. Anything
else
with respect to both sides here, I have had numerous clients come to me
requesting Contribute as a solution. I would say the reason, in every case
i believe, is the cost. It's a 1 time fee of $99. I imagine, that if you
can offer something comparable or cheaper to them, they would appreciate
the
Hi,
I'm currently on leave until the 17th of November.
For New Zealand inquiries please contact Patrick FitzGerald (mailto:[EMAIL
PROTECTED])
For Tasmanian / Support inquiries please contact either:
Casey Farrell (Implementation) (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Amanda Brown (Project
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Lane
Sent: Sunday, 2 November 2008 7:06 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Standards and Adobe Contribute
I'm sorry, Mark, but that is not a winning strategy in business.
As a web developer, you *must* design
@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Standards and Adobe Contribute
I'm sorry, Mark, but that is not a winning strategy in business.
As a web developer, you *must* design for maintainability. Anything
else is a disservice to both your business and your customer. The
customer is not always right
With respect Mark,
Please do not misrepresent me.
I did not say the client had to do it my way, to the contrary, I said
in my post, in a portion you did not include, that the technology used
must be derived from a business strategy and a needs scope of the site.
To wit:
The technology
Hi,
I'm currently on leave until the 17th of November.
For New Zealand inquiries please contact Patrick FitzGerald (mailto:[EMAIL
PROTECTED])
For Tasmanian / Support inquiries please contact either:
Casey Farrell (Implementation) (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Amanda Brown (Project
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 08:21 -0500, Todd Budnikas wrote:
with respect to both sides here, I have had numerous clients come to me
requesting Contribute as a solution. I would say the reason, in every case
i believe, is the cost. It's a 1 time fee of $99. I imagine, that if you
can offer
Hi Guys,
A client wants to use Adobe Contribute for content management.
Is there any point writing standards complient code or will contribute
butcher the code anyway?
Can I use php at all with contribute? Would love to be able to include html
files using php to avoid having to change loads of
Message-
From: James Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: 11/1/08 6:56 AM
Subject: [WSG] Standards and Adobe Contribute
Hi Guys,
A client wants to use Adobe Contribute for content management.
Is there any point writing standards complient code
Hi James
Oddly, someone asked a similar question today in LinkedIn.
http://www.linkedin.com/answers/technology/web-development/TCH_WDD/355859-15475515
Contribute is not about content management and you should never let
the client specify the technology, that's YOUR job The technology you
Joe Ortenzi wrote:
Contribute is not about content management as much as it is about
allowing an in-house web team to share tasks without a proper CMS
deployed. Thus your coder can code and the content writer can write but
it can be all wrapped within a team. This is, frankly, Web 1.0, and
Hi Guys,
Just wondering if there is a standards compliant way of implementing
'autocomplete' on forms, which I believe is proprietry...?
An example might be that there is a login and password field on a banking
site and you don't want the browser to remember the data. I realise there
are ways
Lisa Herrod wrote:
Just wondering if there is a standards compliant way of implementing
'autocomplete' on forms, which I believe is proprietry...?
Not tested it, but...could you inject the autocomplete=off via
javascript to the form element?
An example might be that there is a login and
I have had the same question fluttering around in my head.
the thought process for me begins with Accessibility:
can other people still get to the search result that the auto complete is
attempting to show if the are using a screen reader or have javascript turned
off, or there are bugs (like
2008/7/1 Patrick H. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Lisa Herrod wrote:
Just wondering if there is a standards compliant way of implementing
'autocomplete' on forms, which I believe is proprietry...?
Not tested it, but...could you inject the autocomplete=off via javascript
to the form element?
Hi Adam,
We've tried developing in-house ourselves but we've found the solutions we
have in place has become difficult to maintain. With a pre-existing CMS and
a solid community behind it we won't have to build upgrades ourselves, we
simply need to install them.
I've heard lots of good things
Hi Richard,
Thanks for your suggestion, MySource Matrix is already on our list of
solutions to evaluate. I didn't know Squiz has an office in Melbourne
though! Along with solid community support we're also looking for a solution
which can supply commercial support should we need it, and MySource
Hello,
Take a look at Drupal:
http://drupal.org
It's powerfull, it's flexible and have a lot of coll stuff and tries
to follow web standards...
Have a nice day! @:D
Luiz Gustavo Aleagi Nunes
-
Nosce te ipsum
-
http://sapiensdc.com.br
On Thu,
With respect, last time I looked, the WSG-CMS list was over there
From the Guidelines:
The mail list does not cover:
* Non-Web Standards related issues and support
* Discussion of server-side scripting beyond that directly involved
with Web Standards
* Discussion of content
Aleagi: Yep, we're looking at Drupal too.
Michael: Thanks for pointing that out, I didn't know we had a list
specifically for CMS's. I'll direct my query there :)
Cheers,
Sarah
On 3/14/08, Mark Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With respect, last time I looked, the WSG-CMS list was over there
Some excellent OpenSource CMS systems that I have had the pleasure of
working with for real production work in various client environments
include:
1. Joomla
2. XOOPS
3. WordPress
4. PhpNuke
5. PostNuke
6. TextPattern
Joomla is currently my favorite for clients with broad needs -- say,
Sarah Simmonds wrote:
Michael: Thanks for pointing that out, I didn't know we had a list
specifically for CMS's. I'll direct my query there :)
Cheers,
Sarah
On 3/14/08, Mark Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With respect, last time I looked, the WSG-CMS list was over there
Y'know, I can
Hi WSGers,
We're currently looking to move all of our websites to a single Content
Management System. As part of the CMS evaluation process we're interested in
finding out what's currently in use out there.
So my question is three fold:
1) What CMS system do you use to manage multiple websites?
I have developed my own cms system - it does not limit designs at all - let
your designer go wild. It is very easy to use for the end user. 100%
standards compliant (unless the person that creates the sites templates does
not know what they are doing). I found the problem with most solutions is
Every user smart enough to know there are non IE browsers are smart
enough to know sometimes you have to switch back to IE to make the
website work.
Now this is not true I got caught out this weekend discovering that
I needed to use IE for a media program that I assumed was just not
On Jan 13, 2008 5:34 AM, Steve Olive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry to spoil your fun Michael, but 100% of Apple Mac OS X 10.4 or better
don't have IE installed at all. There are also 100% of Linux users who
don't
have IE installed by default. Nokia, Motorola, etc don't have IE installed
on
Thank you for your sanity check steve!
Joe
On Jan 13 2008, at 05:34, Steve Olive wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:31:45 pm Michael Horowitz wrote:
The answer is very simple. 100% of potential users of a website
have IE
on their computer.
Michael Horowitz
Your Computer Consultant
Michael, get real
You are an intelligent person ad saying something obviously
inflammatory is very ignorant.
Go to websidestory, searchenginewatch or perhaps look at your own
Analytics stats and you will see that the statement 100% of potential
users of a website have IE on their
There is blame to go around, for sure.
I had an accessibility issue just this morning, while trying to find out
about filing an insurance claim on my husband's car (which someone ran into
in the middle of the night ... and took off). In Firefox, my browser of
choice, the text on the page I needed
The answer is very simple. 100% of potential users of a website have IE
on their computer. Every user smart enough to know there are non IE
browsers are smart enough to know sometimes you have to switch back to
IE to make the website work.
The question becomes from a business perspective is
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:31:45 pm Michael Horowitz wrote:
The answer is very simple. 100% of potential users of a website have IE
on their computer.
Michael Horowitz
Your Computer Consultant
http://yourcomputerconsultant.com
561-394-9079
Sorry to spoil your fun Michael, but 100% of Apple
That's a great idea, I think i'll do that too.
it's really annoying that people disregard the fact that there are other
browsers out there, and make their site solely for ie6 and they don't even
think about validating it...
But your idea is good, to tell them about it will hopefully bring a
On Jan 9, 2008, at 12:58 AM, Steve Green wrote:
standards-compliant designers represent perhaps 1% of the industry
is this really the figure - any sources?
very depressing - and doesn't help those in a similar position to
mine - The Florida Library Association (of which our director was
On Jan 9, 2008 2:01 PM, Andrew Maben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
standards-compliant designers represent perhaps 1% of the industry
is this really the figure - any sources?
It's impossible to say, unless you draw a line in the sand and define what
qualifies someone to call themselves a 'web
] On
Behalf Of Matthew Pennell
Sent: 09 January 2008 14:12
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] standards-compliant designers
On Jan 9, 2008 2:01 PM, Andrew Maben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
standards-compliant designers represent perhaps 1% of the industry
is this really the figure
Steve Green wrote:
Of course I made up that 1% figure but I don't suppose it's far out. Just
look at the phenomenal number of crap websites out there. There are
something like 100,000 people offering web design services in the UK (10,000
in London alone) yet GAWDS membership (which is global) is
Mark Harris wrote:
1 crap designer can turn out many, many crap sites. The damage done by
Sieglal's Designing Killer Websites (1st edition - he recanted later)
was huge. Back when I was starting, I bought it and used it as a bible
of what not to do, but many used it as a how-to guide, and
I tend to agree with Mark. IT guys in my experience tend not to be
'joiners' you work in a corporate IT department and you will quickly
realise that people use terms like 'Crypt' and 'Beige'
I have worked from both sides of the fence as both an indepentant but also
as the main web guy within a
Patrick, reports based on server log files are considerably limiting.
For example, visitors are generally identified by IP and Session ID.
This doesn't tell me if the person is a repeat customer, or how often
they frequent the website, and also provides more accurate filtering of
non-human user
Hey all,
I'm investigating improving our current method of reporting our web
traffic - we currently use server logs only (with an annual community
survey for good measure).
I'm looking for a Javascript page-tagging solution, that is
unobtrusive (keeping in line with our current progressive
Have you looked at Google Analytics?
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:52:44 +1000, Paul Hempsall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
I'm investigating improving our current method of reporting our web
traffic - we currently use server logs only (with an annual community
survey for good measure).
I'm
Try this:
http://www.google.com/analytics/
Hope its good.
Regards,
Jason
www.flexewebs.com
On 8/27/07, Paul Hempsall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
I'm investigating improving our current method of reporting our web
traffic - we currently use server logs only (with an annual
Paul Hempsall wrote:
I'm investigating improving our current method of reporting our web
traffic - we currently use server logs only (with an annual community
survey for good measure).
You haven't really defined your probem...what exactly is it that you're
trying to improve? I'm assuming
: [WSG] Standards friendly 'page tagging' web stats
I'm looking for a Javascript page-tagging solution, that is
unobtrusive (keeping in line with our current progressive enhancement
paradigm), standards compliant, reliable/error free (ie. Supported
across multiple browsers).
Paul Hempsall
Web
Thanks for the responses and suggestions.
I haven't checked out Google Analytics yet, although it was on my list.
In fact I'm heading down to Sydney in Sept for some training on it's use
and how to best implement it.
Patrick, reports based on server log files are considerably limiting.
For
Hi Paul,
I'm heading down to Sydney in Sept for some training on it's use
and how to best implement it.
Please tell me your not paying for that.
About Google Analytics
http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/topic.py?topic=10977
Installing the tracking code
Hi;
Does anyone have any views regarding the best blogging tool (server-
side, not hosted) from a web-standards perspective? I'm looking at
setting up a business blog at the moment and although I'm wading through
'Blog Design Solutions' by Andy Budd et al I'm still not certain which
one to settle
I've only used Expression Engine and Wordpress but they'll output whatever
HTML you put into your templates so how standards-friendly is entirely up
to the user and there is no limitations imposed by the CMS.
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:01:32 +1000, Rick Lecoat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi;
On 13/8/07 (11:57) John said:
I've only used Expression Engine and Wordpress but they'll output whatever
HTML you put into your templates so how standards-friendly is entirely up
to the user and there is no limitations imposed by the CMS.
That's good to know John, thanks.
I was concerned
Rick,
Yes, you can make a Wordpress, Expression Engine, Textpattern,
MovableType, etc. blog COMPLETELY validate. Example:
http://www.christianmontoya.com/
You can even make a Wordpress blog (and probably the others) output
valid HTML 4 instead of XHTML. Tutorial:
Most HTML tags get written into your template by you. There's only a few
functions I can think of that output tags as well as a content and most of
the time, it's perfectly valid HTML.
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:24:36 +1000, Rick Lecoat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 13/8/07 (11:57) John said:
On 13/8/07 (13:01) Christian said:
You can even make a Wordpress blog (and probably the others) output
valid HTML 4 instead of XHTML. Tutorial:
http://www.christianmontoya.com/2006/02/13/serve-your-weblog-as-html-401/
That's a really useful tutorial Christian, thanks.
One question though: On
Rick, PHP shouldn't affect IE at all because it gets calculated on
the server, so by the time the page gets to the browser, it's 100%
HTML/XHTML/whatever - no PHP is seen on the client-side at all.
Cheers,
C
Caitlin Rowley, B. Mus. (Hons), Gr. Dip. Design
Composer, musicologist, web
...
One question though: On your tutorial page, you appear to put some PHP
code above the doctype in order to remove any instance of self-closing
tags. Specifically:
...
Does this not throw Explorer into quirks mode? I was under the
impression that anything (other than whitespace, maybe)
On 13/8/07 (15:27) minim said:
Rick, PHP shouldn't affect IE at all because it gets calculated on
the server, so by the time the page gets to the browser, it's 100%
HTML/XHTML/whatever - no PHP is seen on the client-side at all.
Cheers,
C
A ha. Good to know. Thanks.
--
Rick Lecoat
This is a discussion that continuously reappears on this list.
I've been down this path myself and these days agree with those who say
not to bother selling the standards to people. They really don't care.
Sorry. I spent many meetings with clients trying to explain what
standards are, and
Hello,
This has been discussed before but i was wondering about new input.
I've tendered on a big job and i will be up against a lot of competition.
What are some web standards selling points that might get through to a
completely uniformed, unsavy client.
The job requires a cms, ill be using
There are some Irish guidelines and what about the status of EU
standards compliance?
http://accessit.nda.ie/technologyindex_1.html
Tim
On 09/03/2007, at 1:18 AM, kevin mcmonagle wrote:
Hello,
This has been discussed before but i was wondering about new input.
I've tendered on a big job
Best practices is a good phrase to use in conjunction with standards,
especially when the best practices are research-based. Usability.gov
provides free Research-Based Web Design Usability Guidelines that are
quite comprehensive.
On 3/8/07 8:18 AM, kevin mcmonagle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adrian Lynch wrote:
Knowing that XHTML5 is developed in the same spec means that we can
push forward with our XSLT based workflows, and simply adjust to suit
once XHTML5 is supported at the browser level.
--
I had the same concern. As it turns out one can - at least in many cases
- use the
kevin mcmonagle wrote:
Hello,
This has been discussed before but i was wondering about new input.
I've tendered on a big job and i will be up against a lot of competition.
What are some web standards selling points that might get through to a
completely uniformed, unsavy client.
In a couple
In my experience, it's a bad move to try and sell a client on the
technology you intend to use. The more technologically unsavvy they
are, the less interested they will be in what technology you are
using. (Remember this is my experience).
I've had better success determining what problems
kevin mcmonagle wrote:
Hello,
This has been discussed before but i was wondering about new input.
I've tendered on a big job and i will be up against a lot of competition.
What are some web standards selling points that might get through to a
completely uniformed, unsavy client.
MACCAWS was
On Feb 28, 2007, at 9:03 PM, Mike Brown wrote:
or even what makes a good usability consultant
Perhaps, but I think what makes for usability itself should be a
concern to us all. What are standards for after all? Is writing valid
code an end in itself, or a means to an end? As I see it, it
Hello,
Can anyone please recommend a standards compliant slideshow script
that uses a list of images within the HTML markup to dynamically
create the show.
Thanks
Daz
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Hi,
Maybe you could take a look at HTML Sildy
(www.w3.org/2005/03/slideshow.html )?
-Ben
Hello,
Can anyone please recommend a standards compliant slideshow script that
uses a list of images within the HTML markup to dynamically
create the show.
Thanks
Daz
Can anyone please recommend a standards compliant slideshow script that
uses a list of images within the HTML markup to dynamically
create the show.
http://slayeroffice.com/code/imageCrossFade/xfade2.html
--
DonkeyMagic: Website design development
http://www.donkeymagic.co.uk
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Stephenson
Sent: 13 March 2006 15:01
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Standards compliant slideshow
Can anyone please recommend a standards compliant slideshow script
that uses a list of images within the HTML markup to dynamically
create
Darren West wrote:
Hello,
Can anyone please recommend a standards compliant slideshow script
that uses a list of images within the HTML markup to dynamically
create the show.
Slightly self-promoting but try http://scooch.gr0w.com . The current
demo is woefully out of date already with a lot
Subject: (Potential Spam) [WSG] Standards Savvy Shopping Cart
Hello
I am looking for a web standards friendly shopping cart for an upcoming
project. I have had a look but not had much luck, previously used CactusASP
but the amount of spurious and unnecessary HTML will not have me calling again
hello,
does the ie7 beta allow scaling of fonts set in pixels?
-kvnmcwebn
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
From: kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hello,
does the ie7 beta allow scaling of fonts set in pixels?
-kvnmcwebn
No - but it does have a new zoom tool a la Opera.
--
Al Sparber
PVII
http://www.projectseven.com
Designing with CSS is sometimes like barreling down a crumbling
mountain road at 90
Hey Ed
You could do
http://www.oscommerce.com with the STS Template contribution (see the
Contributions page, search for STS)
It allows you to completely reskin the tag casserole it ships with...so
the Standards savvy bit falls onto your plate - but I haven't seen a
shopping cart out there
Title: Standards Savvy Shopping Cart
Hello
I am looking for a web standards friendly shopping cart for an upcoming project. I have had a look but not had much luck, previously used CactusASP but the amount of spurious and unnecessary HTML will not have me calling again.
Would appreciate
Web Man Walking wrote:
I am looking for a web standards friendly shopping cart for an upcoming
project. I have had a look but not had much luck, previously used
CactusASP but the amount of spurious and unnecessary HTML will not have
me calling again.
TradingEye is quite nice
CubeCart or Zen Cart may also be fine.
--
Jan Brasna :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com | www.wdnews.net
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on
1 - 100 of 345 matches
Mail list logo
