the following:
- jdk support for at least 7 (varargs need 5, but MessageFormat 7)
- remove AvalonLogger and LogKitLogger
For anything more I would point to log4j 2.
Gary
div Original message /divdivFrom: Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com /divdivDate:11/30/2014 16
Christian
Gary
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014, at 00:50, sebb wrote:
But it would be interesting to know why the Spring dev thought a new
version would be useful.
The team seemed to discuss moving to slf4j
thing to compare WRT to
performance and String.format and our own {} support... any thoughts on
that?
Gary
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014, at 00:50, sebb wrote:
But it would be interesting to know why the Spring
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014, at 18:04, sebb wrote:
On 1 December 2014 at 09:28, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
wrote:
That aside, I would do the following:
- jdk support for at least 7 (varargs need 5, but MessageFormat 7)
Just saw MessageFormat is even available in jdk 5. So I would
Hi folks,
I am perfectly aware that I was saying CL needs to be deprecated only
before month.
Tomcat uses CL and that was more or less the reason it would stay - so I
thought.
Recently I talked to a person actively involved in Spring. He explained,
Spring would use
CL and they are quite happy
Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-08-21 21:15 GMT+02:00 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com:
On 20 Aug 2014, at 15:47, sebb wrote:
On 20 August 2014 14:37, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote
On 20 Aug 2014, at 19:35, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
On 20.08.14 15:37, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:28 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 August 2014 14:04, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Moving discussion about logging from [JCS-122] to this dev ML.
Why not
On 20 Aug 2014, at 15:47, sebb wrote:
On 20 August 2014 14:37, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:28 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 August 2014 14:04, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Moving discussion about logging from [JCS-122] to this
Romain,
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-08-21 21:15 GMT+02:00 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com:
Not adding a dependency for one line answer.
For longer one: take tomee example: we have [logging], slf4j cause of
dependencies
On 5 Dec 2013, at 13:44, Valentin Waeselynck wrote:
Should I keep answering to the whole ML about this, or only to you?
Keep the mailing list in loop. There might be others interested in this.
In addition ml do document history which is why we always use the ml.
Best regards,
Valentin
Hi folks,
i found this interesting:
http://www.takipiblog.com/2013/11/26/githubs-1-most-popular-java-projects-here-are-the-top-libraries-they-use/
Cheers
Christian
---
http://www.grobmeier.de
@grobmeier
GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
-
, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On 29 Nov 2013, at 19:21, sebb wrote:
I agree that the Javadoc pages could be removed.
Although it would not be difficult to fix the individual pages,
there's not much point in fixing Javadoc for dormant components.
However I'm not sure it makes sense to delete the entire
Date:12/04/2013 03:42 (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [all] Removing websites of dormant components
Le 04/12/2013 09:35, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
No objections or no interest?
A few more comments would have been helpful.
I am going to remove all
On 26 Nov 2013, at 14:35, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org
wrote:
Le 26/11/2013 08:43, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
I propose [1] as branching model. It looks very complicated at
first, but
I've found it very useful to always have a release
On 19.10. I wrote a mail in response to Henri Yandell.
http://markmail.org/message/c63kqyipuy6islib
I would like to follow up on the issues i mentioned there.
Our dormant components are unmaintained and our dormant websites are
broken.
Therefore I would like to remove the websites.
In
On 29 Nov 2013, at 14:39, Torsten Curdt wrote:
This in fact means:
create a master branch which is stable.
create a develop branch which is not so stable.
create feature branches from develop where you work out your
changes.
We are just swapping the branch names here, in the end your
On 29 Nov 2013, at 14:44, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 29/11/2013 14:28, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
We should respect the naming conventions of git as good as possible.
But git is a tool, not a development method, right? As such it doesn't
mandate any specific workflow, even if a random
On 29 Nov 2013, at 19:21, sebb wrote:
I agree that the Javadoc pages could be removed.
Although it would not be difficult to fix the individual pages,
there's not much point in fixing Javadoc for dormant components.
However I'm not sure it makes sense to delete the entire website
because of
On 14 Nov 2013, at 10:01, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 10/11/2013 21:46, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
From all the log4j talks I gave recently there were zero people using
commons-logging. For me it is dead.
For what it's worth, the install base of commons-logging in Debian is
ten times
On 10 Nov 2013, at 18:47, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
Ok, so let's leave logging layer for now and we should focus on
preparing the first release
+1, thanks Lukasz!
2013/11/9 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com:
Neither does log4j 2 ;)
Original message
From: henrib
On 10 Nov 2013, at 21:24, henrib wrote:
Would you share why ? I'm sure it would be beneficial to others
(including
the commons logging community).
Sorry I was short in my reply because I mentioned this a few times
already. Didn't find the mails, so here we go:
As you probably know, I have
:
-Original Message-
From: Benedikt Ritter [mailto:brit...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 4:28
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [OGNL] Make use of logging?
2013/9/4 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org
2013/9/3 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com:
I found 11 uses
On 18 Oct 2013, at 9:24, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Christian,
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On 17 Oct 2013, at 18:12, Paul Benedict wrote:
I am glad to hear being dormant is not the same thing as being in
the
attic
Why?
Because attic means more or less that we not even intend to work
On 19 Oct 2013, at 17:22, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
Being in the attic is NOT a permanent thing. Get active developers,
leave
the attic. If a project doesn't make any sense, stay in the attic.
We are having an attic
On 17 Oct 2013, at 2:39, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:59 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 October 2013 12:25, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
wrote:
If nobody is willing to put a component to dormant state, then the
label doesn't make any sense. I would vote
If nobody is willing to put a component to dormant state, then the
label doesn't make any sense. I would vote to remove the dormant state
in general.
If we don't have any need of a specific component we can put it to
attic.apache.org too.
No need to duplicate things.
If we don't have a
Hi,
[X] +1 Release these artifacts
On 16 Oct 2013, at 15:20, Gary Gregory wrote:
Thank you Stefan for the new RC.
+1
Maybe I have interpreted the Clirr report wrong. But besides the two
buffer fields it doesn't look so bad (just additions). I believe these
two fields are acceptable
On 16 Oct 2013, at 16:28, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
Maybe I have interpreted the Clirr report wrong. But besides the two
buffer fields it doesn't look so bad (just additions). I believe
these two
fields are acceptable
James Carman
Romain Manni-Bucau
Matt Benson
Benedikt Ritter
Bruno Kinoshita
Gary Gregory
Luc Maisonobe
Oliver Heger
Christian Grobmeier
Torsten Curdt
-1s
Mark Thomas
Thomas Vandahl
Damjan Jovanovic
Gilles Sadowski
Jorg Schaible
+0.5
Olivier Lamy
+0
Ralph Goers
-0
Emmanuel Bourg
The vote passes
On 16 Oct 2013, at 22:46, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 10/16/13 1:34 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On 14 Oct 2013, at 9:13, Mark Thomas wrote:
Further, if the consensus amongst the active developers on a
component
is that they wish to stick to svn, I see no why that component
should be
forced
On 14 Oct 2013, at 15:34, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Thanks to the infra team we now have JIRA and svn commit notifications
on the channel. Enjoy :)
boah thats cool! Thanks for organizing that! (assuming oyu did!)
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 10/10/2013 18:15, James Carman a écrit :
As a reminder, we
On 10 Oct 2013, at 18:43, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi James,
James Carman wrote:
Sorry, didn't understand your question. The Apache Camel team uses
Git and they release maintenance versions all the time (I believe
about 3 or 4 at a time sometimes when a bug fix gets merged down).
Here's a
+1
I consider this move to happen step by step and see only little risk if
we start with a single component first.
As the half of the world works with git meanwhile I see less risk in
general too.
On 10 Oct 2013, at 16:41, James Carman wrote:
All,
We have had some great discussions
, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
+1
I consider this move to happen step by step and see only little risk
if we
start with a single component first.
As the half of the world works with git meanwhile I see less risk in
general too.
On 10 Oct 2013, at 16:41
+1
let's move on step by step.
On 10 Oct 2013, at 16:50, James Carman wrote:
All,
We have had some great discussions about moving our SCM to Git. I
think it's time to put it to a vote. So, here we go:
+1 - yes, move to Git
-1 - no, do not move to Git
The vote will be left open for 72
Here is some commit activity:
http://svnsearch.org/svnsearch/repos/ASF/search?view=plotfrom=20130101to=20131009path=%2Fcommons%2Fproperplotsort=%24plotsort
But we should to exclude typo fixes and such.
For example:
On 8 Oct 2013, at 6:53, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi
Not sure svn is the issue. What makes quality and which rules are
mandatory
is more important IMO.
If you want to attract a new generation it is important. Would you
contribute to a CVS project?
I would if you need it urgently for work.
On 8 Oct 2013, at 11:42, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
just an habit. svn diff attach diff to a jira is as easy/hard as
git
push + PR.
Tools like GitHub succeed because not everybody agrees with you.
svn/diff is stoneage to some. git/pr is the future for them. Maybe you
are right about the
On 8 Oct 2013, at 20:07, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hey Gary,
you are involved in other projects (like log4j2) how do they do it? Is
it easier to release log4j2 than it is to release for example [lang]?
Check this guide:
http://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4j2ReleaseGuide
In fact we have an ASF
On 7 Oct 2013, at 12:58, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Hi Jochen,
Well summarized.
And I think you figured out what the real problem is.
We could work as in Incubator, isn't it?
Having one big umbrella and real subprojects.
What would be the difference to now?
I understand Commons as a
On 7 Oct 2013, at 13:58, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
What would be the difference to now?
The difference can be *huge*, emotionally. For example, I felt quite
at
home at the webservices project when working in JaxMe
On 6 Oct 2013, at 20:57, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 10/6/13 11:45 AM, James Carman wrote:
Collections 4.x, nuff said
Huh? Didn't we release a beta? We could say the same thing about
math 4.0, pool/dbcp 2.0, etc. These things are in progress. They
will get released. There is activity. I
James,
thank you.
I believe Commons is in a bad shape.
Look at Commons Collections. Before 4 years somebody
said Guava is more modern, he his answer seems to be widely accepted.
http://stackoverflow.com/a/167/690771
This guy said we have no generics. What did we do in the past 4 years?
On 5 Oct 2013, at 14:29, James Carman wrote:
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Benedikt Ritter benerit...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm not sure I agree with all of your points. Yes, the sandbox is a
place to try new ideas out. Does this mean certain quality criterions
do not apply? I don't think so.
I found 11 uses of e.printStackTrace and think its pretty bad.
Including OgnlException overwrites printStackTrace and writes to
System.err for some reason.
In addition there are a lot of System.out's, but those are all commented
and seem to have served debugging purposes.
I believe small libs
I found this in ognl pom:
plugin
groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId
artifactIdmaven-checkstyle-plugin/artifactId
version2.7/version
configuration
configLocationconfig/maven_checks.xml/configLocation
now.
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
2013/3/8 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:11 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 March 2013 06:49, Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I was checking out what should
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org wrote:
2013/3/26 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com:
+1, go for it.
Now its time to see if our testcases are good.
They are, I made a slight mistake and tests showed that :-)
I also think we should test
VisualizeMe: http://vizualize.me/maurizio.cucchiara?r=maurizio.cucchiara
Maurizio Cucchiara
On 26 March 2013 09:53, Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org wrote:
2013/3/26 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com:
+1, go for it.
Now its time to see if our testcases are good.
They are, I made
Should we move to the AdminGroups with this wiki too?
I think yes
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Apache Wiki wikidi...@apache.org wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Commons Wiki for
change notification.
The MarlaQuin page has been changed by
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
+/**
+ * Returns an iterator over the values of this record.
+ *
+ * @return an iterator over the values of this record.
+ */
I had no better idea how to comment this. Any suggestions how to make
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 10:00 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 March 2013 00:39, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what the big deal is. Sebb vetoed a commit and
identified exactly what needed to be changed for him to remove the veto. If
the
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:11 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 March 2013 06:49, Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I was checking out what should be solved before releasing a new
version and in my opinion most of PMD [1] errors can be omitted, maybe
These nested if
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Strictly speaking, you do not need his permission AFAIK. IOW, don't bother
sending ME an email to tell me you'll moving my @author to pom.xml ;)
Out of interest, are you sure there is no permission needed? I am
thinking
+1... jdk1.3...
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Just for the record: I don't intend to do a major rewrite ATM, just
update and bugfix.
best,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 12/01/2013 19:29, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 12/01/2013 17:36, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Basically I am +1 on moving to newer JDKs. But in this case
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Thomas Neidhart
thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm -1 on this change. I don't see any reason to do it. We don't need
features from a more recent Java version in commons-logging. As others
have said: most users of commons-logging are old and older apps.
In
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
On 2013-01-13 19:14, t...@apache.org wrote:
Author: tn
Date: Sun Jan 13 18:14:24 2013
New Revision: 1432688
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1432688view=rev
Log:
Upgrade test dependencies: log4j 1.2.17,
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Thomas Neidhart
thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to do a similar cleanup as for email also for logging and
aim for a 1.2 release in the coming weeks. The things I have in mind:
* update to Java 5
* comply to default maven structure
*
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Thomas Neidhart
thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/12/2013 05:37 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Thomas Neidhart
thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to do a similar cleanup as for email also for logging
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org wrote:
Another issue, I've noticed that the parent is defined as 28-SNAPSHOT,
should it be simple 27 - the latest released version?
Not sure about the differences of these 2, but I think we cannot
release a stable version
Do you know how to exclude some files/directories from the rat-plugin
scan ? Right now it includes .idea folder in the scan which produces
mass of errors :\
have not tried yet, but it supports an exclude option in the configuration:
http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/rat-mojo.html
starting from 1. January. Just saw a final reminder from Infra.
Commons is surely a LOT of work.
I would like to suggest we act immediately.
In other terms: let us request a commons-test cms where we can try things
out and prepare the new sites.
As Ralph Goers has already mentioned, we have a
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Bah, let's pick one component and start there and skip a test site.
But then there is only one component visible under the new commons.a.o?
Gary
On Dec 10, 2012, at 3:08, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote
a switch from
commons.apache.org to the new site
Gary
On Dec 10, 2012, at 7:13, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Bah, let's pick one component and start there and skip a test site
and will not change for some time to come.
Phil
Ralph
On Dec 10, 2012, at 4:34 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Well, we have to start somewhere. This is going to be a lot of work,
we have many components, unless
moved to svn pub-sub.
Sorry if above is naive. The intent is to avoid a huge amount of
fiddling in a short period of time when quite a few component sites
have not changed and will not change for some time to come.
Phil
Ralph
On Dec 10, 2012, at 4:34 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
On Nov 14, 2012, at 2:03 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
2012/11/14 Thomas Vandahl t...@apache.org:
On 14.11.2012 08:40, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Please,
Hi,
I am there too! (referring to ApacheCon EU)
Cheers
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Thomas Neidhart
thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
does anybody plan to go to ApacheCon 2012?
Would be nice to meet each other there.
Thomas
Hi,
and just to say it clearly: i am very much +1 to finally add this skin.
Cheers
Christian
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi again,
Thanks to Christian Grobmeier, we also added the responsive bootstrap css.
I re-uploaded the site, can you
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Le 30/08/2012 15:52, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
Hi all guys,
new Apache Maven Fluido Skin is gonna be released soon, I started
experimenting locally how the _main_ commons site would look alike if
the new skin would be
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Sébastien Brisard
sebastien.bris...@m4x.org wrote:
Does that mean that porting it into Commons-Math is possible
(license-wise?). I would think it does…
That seems explicitly restrictive to me. e.g. If I don't claim to be in the
general scientific community,
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 1:50 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 June 2012 22:50, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Some new SANSELAN JIRAs have just been raised, however the JIRA was
renamed to IMAGING.
Looks like something is wrong with JIRA; I'll raise an Infra issue.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 6:25 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 June 2012 16:30, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:59 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 June 2012 13:05, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:56
However, as already mentioned on the respository mailing list, the
.asc has been restored to the staging directory, so it should now be
possible to release the full set of files.
I saw the mail from infra, but he mentioned the checksum is not
correct or something like that. Or am I wrong? we
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
jochen.wiedm...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Commons-IO 2.4 has not made it to a Maven repo yet. I am
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:59 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 June 2012 13:05, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
jochen.wiedm...@gmail.comwrote
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Łukasz Lenart
lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote:
Finally, the old issues from OpenSymphony were imported :-)
You are a true hero and i am impressed by your patience!
Thank you so much for following this issue for so long time. I would
have done a simple copy,
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
If sonar for snapshots on a.a.o replaces POM requested reports instead
of complementing them, you loose the ability to analyze before
committing, surely something we do not want.
you can use:
mvn sonar:sonar
before you
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
I would rather we eat our own dog food with log4j or commons logging.
As classscan is in sandbox... I think it would help the logging team
if we would try log4j 2.0 alpha. It is a great framework already and
+1
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to release Compress 1.4.1.
Compress 1.4.1 RC1 is available for review here:
http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/cc/
Maven artifacts are here:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 12:43 AM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
Perhaps classscan? :)
makes perfect sense to me :-)
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 19, 2012 10:13 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
A one
idea ?
Luc
Thanks,
Jochen
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Its still in development.
I have asked to switch to git with log4php before a few weeks and the
answer was it is possible, if one of us gets involved in the
git
Its still in development.
I have asked to switch to git with log4php before a few weeks and the
answer was it is possible, if one of us gets involved in the
git@apache project. I assume it is the the here. Its definitely not GA
at the moment.
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
I read the thread and thought BeanShell would fit to Commons... I
think there are only a few committers.
OGNL is in the same vein too. I would oppose if the BS developers are
not willing to continue the project here. This is not very likely the
case here
Cheers,
Christian
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2012-03-31, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Before ages when I wrote the ChangeSet stuff I have marked them as
experimental. Have not heard any complains yet... we should discuss
if we remove that label or if need some
+1
Before ages when I wrote the ChangeSet stuff I have marked them as
experimental. Have not heard any complains yet... we should discuss
if we remove that label or if need some more tweaks there. Probably
after 1.4?
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Hi
+1 on the move to java 6
we should consider to go to 3.0... its a breaking change... but i
leave it up to you
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Paul Libbrecht p...@hoplahup.net wrote:
Will the resulting jars still
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:53 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrot
However, a compatibility break would require a major version bump.
if my lib does drop support for a specific jdk, isn't that a
compatibility break? My argument is it is no longer compatible with
jdk5.
However, please do not
2012/3/22 Łukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com:
2012/3/21 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com:
I don't know, maybe this is against ASF law or so ...
oh... good question. But maybe copy/paste can be seen as some kind of
manual export plugin? :-)
and it'll take
some time to manually
some time
2012/1/19 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com:
Thanks for all the work Lukasz, I appreciate it!!
2012/1/19 Łukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com:
2012/1/18 Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com:
As I do see that ticket, it is currently properly assigned
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
wrong code style anyway :P
Wow, I have waited for this a long time...!
Welcome to the good side of bracket-life ;-)
congrats!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
That's what the wiki is for no?
You could make a page for [math] like
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
Not to forget the grandfather of release guides:
http://commons.apache.org/releases/release.html
Cheers
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Gilles Sadowski
gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
Not to forget the grandfather of release guides:
http://commons.apache.org/releases/release.html
I've just had a brief look at that one; I did not know it existed...
not very well linked imho... if it is
In langs StringEscapeUtils are some static methods marked with
final... it makes no sense to me to do that. I would like to remove
the final keywords. Any objections? not sure if this breaks bc (cannot
imagine)
Cheers
--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:33 AM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
I don't think we should be trying to recode JDK classes.
If the implementations suck, why not?
+1
--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de
+1 on the mentioned plugins, except:
-1 on checkstyle.
I dont see a benefit in making checkstyle default. If somebody wants
to use that tool, he can.
What checkstyle-style would be the default? Sun conventions or maven
style? I am for sun, Simone is for maven (i guess). Probably there is
another
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Gilles Sadowski
gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
Hi.
[...]
The tools are there, but you have to tell people that they _must_ use them.
Commons has already enough rules and process. As long as the releases
are have clean code I wouldn't be too anal
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Gilles Sadowski
gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
And thats what I meant with: as long as we don't have a common
codestyle, i does not make much sense to have a common checkstyle
configuration.
I thought that the question was whether to generate a CheckStyle
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:30 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 March 2012 16:25, James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
We could say we support short-term storage (or transmission-only) only when
it comes to serialization. That would help eliminate some of the burden
Perhaps,
1 - 100 of 496 matches
Mail list logo
