On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:20:54 UTC, bearophile wrote:
eles:
Speaking about that, why DMD's source files are written in C++
but bear extension .c?
You seem to appreciate for yourselves a freedom that he denies
to others.
Thank you for bringing that good example. Forbidding
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 15:39:27 UTC, eles wrote:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 15:34:37 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 16:22, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 15:13:20 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 16:01, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October
On Tuesday, 10 December 2013 at 09:44:38 UTC, Frustrated wrote:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 15:39:27 UTC, eles wrote:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 15:34:37 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 16:22, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 15:13:20 UTC, dennis luehring
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 17:09:09 UTC, Leandro Lucarella
wrote:
Craig Dillabaugh, el 31 de October a las 15:54 me escribiste:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:29:34 UTC, eles wrote:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:28:05 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
This seems like a bit of
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 22:35:14 UTC, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 21:11:02 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 10/26/2013 2:02 AM, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 08:36:53 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 10/26/2013 12:42 AM, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 22:35:14 UTC, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 21:11:02 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 10/26/2013 2:02 AM, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 08:36:53 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 10/26/2013 12:42 AM, eles wrote:
Thank you for considering it.
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:16:22 UTC, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 22:35:14 UTC, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 21:11:02 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 10/26/2013 2:02 AM, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 08:36:53 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On
eles:
Speaking about that, why DMD's source files are written in C++
but bear extension .c?
You seem to appreciate for yourselves a freedom that he denies
to others.
Thank you for bringing that good example. Forbidding arbitrary
extensions for D code, and enforcing a common standard name
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:20:54 UTC, bearophile wrote:
eles:
Thank you for bringing that good example. Forbidding arbitrary
extensions for D code, and enforcing a common standard name
helps avoid mistakes like those .c extensions in the C++
sources, that numerous persons keep
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:16:22 UTC, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 22:35:14 UTC, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 21:11:02 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 10/26/2013 2:02 AM, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 08:36:53 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:28:05 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
3. My boss is right: is just a toy pretending to be serious -
maybe, maybe not - but not because of your stupid file
extension comments
It adds. Tell to my boss about that extensions and he will be
grateful for you
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:20:54 UTC, bearophile wrote:
eles:
Bye,
bearophile
Well, then allow just extension .d or NO EXTENSION, but consider
files named like:
script.no1
script.julia
script.no5
just as being standard names without any extension (you may see
for yourself that
Must always use script_no1 or script_no1.d?
And maybe one day I have a lot of .py files that I intend to
replace with D scripts TRANSPARENTLY for their user.
Will D bow at me why I use the .py extension?
Is D trying to shoot his own foot? It really seems to succeed
quite well.
My boss is
Am 31.10.2013 15:29, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:28:05 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
3. My boss is right: is just a toy pretending to be serious -
maybe, maybe not - but not because of your stupid file
extension comments
It adds. Tell to my boss about that extensions and he
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:39:34 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 15:29, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:28:05 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
3. My boss is right: is just a toy pretending to be serious
better try to find a more experienced, serious Boss
Do
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:39:34 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 15:29, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:28:05 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
3. My boss is right: is just a toy pretending to be serious
i don't get it
You never wrote git extension scripts,
File content should have nothing to do with extension, it is as
good part of name as any other. Adding any extra meaning to it is
just some DOS legacy.
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:39:34 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 15:29, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:28:05 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
3. My boss is right: is just a toy pretending to be serious
-
maybe, maybe not - but not because of your stupid file
Am 31.10.2013 15:45, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:39:34 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 15:29, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:28:05 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
3. My boss is right: is just a toy pretending to be serious
better try to find a
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:29:34 UTC, eles wrote:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:28:05 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
3. My boss is right: is just a toy pretending to be serious
- maybe, maybe not - but not because of your stupid file
extension comments
It adds. Tell to my boss
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:54:17 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:29:34 UTC, eles wrote:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:28:05 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Finally, you've said a few times that D has crappy tooling. I
am
not sure how this file naming
Am 31.10.2013 15:45, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:39:34 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 15:29, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:28:05 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
3. My boss is right: is just a toy pretending to be serious
better try to find a
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:54:17 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
clip
This seems like a bit of bikeshedding issue. You may have a
strong preference for one option, apparently others feel
differently. Is it really that big an issue? I don't think the
quality of a language depends on its
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:57:43 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:54:17 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
eles, seeing your post above, I guess my use of Python to
justify
my answer turns out to a bad choice on my part :o)
That's true. I hate using it, especially
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:57:15 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 15:45, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:39:34 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 15:29, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:28:05 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
3. My boss is
Am 31.10.2013 16:01, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:57:15 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 15:45, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:39:34 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 15:29, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:28:05 UTC,
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:45:46 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
File content should have nothing to do with extension, it is as
good part of name as any other. Adding any extra meaning to it
is just some DOS legacy.
When I first came to Linux I was wondering how the OS knows it
should execute
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:58:33 UTC, eles wrote:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:54:17 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
Go to that bug report, read the very first message that Walter
used to open the bug report, see about yourself, then come back
here and tell me that the .d thing
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 15:13:20 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 16:01, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:57:15 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 15:45, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:39:34 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 15:22:41 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:58:33 UTC, eles wrote:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:54:17 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
Really, I can see why you want the suggested change, I am just
surprised at the level of importance you
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 15:22:41 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:58:33 UTC, eles wrote:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:54:17 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
Furthermore, reading the Bugzilla entry, it seems there as many
who support your idea as those
Am 31.10.2013 16:22, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 15:13:20 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 16:01, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:57:15 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 15:45, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:39:34 UTC,
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 15:34:37 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 16:22, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 15:13:20 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 16:01, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:57:15 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 15:22:41 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:58:33 UTC, eles wrote:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:54:17 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
I could also argue that this issue is a with git requiring a
'git-' suffix on its scripts
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 16:12:44 UTC, eles wrote:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 15:22:41 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:58:33 UTC, eles wrote:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:54:17 UTC, Craig
Dillabaugh wrote:
Or, it happens, the state lottery
dennis luehring, el 31 de October a las 15:28 me escribiste:
Must always use script_no1 or script_no1.d?
And maybe one day I have a lot of .py files that I intend to
replace with D scripts TRANSPARENTLY for their user.
Will D bow at me why I use the .py extension?
Is D trying to shoot
Craig Dillabaugh, el 31 de October a las 15:54 me escribiste:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:29:34 UTC, eles wrote:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:28:05 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
3. My boss is right: is just a toy pretending to be serious -
maybe, maybe not - but not because of your
Am 31.10.2013 17:44, schrieb Leandro Lucarella:
dennis luehring, el 31 de October a las 15:28 me escribiste:
Must always use script_no1 or script_no1.d?
And maybe one day I have a lot of .py files that I intend to
replace with D scripts TRANSPARENTLY for their user.
Will D bow at me why I use
dennis luehring, el 31 de October a las 18:25 me escribiste:
Am 31.10.2013 17:44, schrieb Leandro Lucarella:
dennis luehring, el 31 de October a las 15:28 me escribiste:
Must always use script_no1 or script_no1.d?
And maybe one day I have a lot of .py files that I intend to
replace with D
On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 20:24:48 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/25/2013 6:15 AM, eles wrote:
Breaking peoples' build scripts and makefiles is not nice :-)
On the same grounds, you could recommend them dmc.
Provide, at least, a flag that passes the file without name
change, for
On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 15:57:27 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 13:24:12 UTC, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 12 October 2013 at 22:16:13 UTC, Walter Bright
When was decided to add this? I would love it, but I cannot
remember that this was decided.
Well, like many other
On 10/26/2013 12:42 AM, eles wrote:
Provide, at least, a flag that passes the file without name change, for example:
dmd -ntest
will really pass test file and not test.d.
I'm curious why naming the file test.d is an issue?
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 08:36:53 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/26/2013 12:42 AM, eles wrote:
I'm curious why naming the file test.d is an issue?
Case:
This forces scrpts to bear the .d extension. For example, if you
write a script on Linux named git-test and you put at the top:
On 10/26/2013 2:02 AM, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 08:36:53 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I'm curious why naming the file test.d is an issue?
Case:
Thanks for the clear explanation. It makes a lot of sense. Let me think about it
for a bit.
On 10/26/2013 2:02 AM, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 08:36:53 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/26/2013 12:42 AM, eles wrote:
I'm curious why naming the file test.d is an issue?
Case:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11365
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 21:11:02 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/26/2013 2:02 AM, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 08:36:53 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 10/26/2013 12:42 AM, eles wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11365
Thank you for considering it.
On Saturday, 12 October 2013 at 22:16:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
Current list of regressions:
It is a specific reason why this is kept?:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ohduisigpwdiqhpde...@forum.dlang.org#post-btwbpwgluzyxmhphwebp:40forum.dlang.org
On Saturday, 12 October 2013 at 22:16:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
Current list of regressions:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advancedbug_severity=regressionbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENED
And the famous
On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 13:24:12 UTC, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 12 October 2013 at 22:16:13 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
Current list of regressions:
On 10/25/2013 6:15 AM, eles wrote:
It is a specific reason why this is kept?:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ohduisigpwdiqhpde...@forum.dlang.org#post-btwbpwgluzyxmhphwebp:40forum.dlang.org
Breaking peoples' build scripts and makefiles is not nice :-)
On 24 October 2013 07:44, Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On 24 October 2013 02:29, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Beta 3:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.064.beta.3.zip
I suppose I better start opening a branch in gdc for the new release
Noticed this in meld,
Beta 3:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.064.beta.3.zip
Why not just copy what Linus does with the Linux kernel. Different people
in charge of different parts of the compiler. Pull requests should go to
the correct person, who then makes a pull request that goes to the main
line.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Leandro Lucarella
On 22 October 2013 08:35, Rory McGuire rjmcgu...@gmail.com wrote:
Why not just copy what Linus does with the Linux kernel. Different people in
charge of different parts of the compiler. Pull requests should go to the
correct person, who then makes a pull request that goes to the main line.
On Saturday, 19 October 2013 at 11:39:08 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
It has been about 3 months since the last release of the D
front-end implementation. Three years experience and
carrying
out over 100 merges into GDC tells me that each time the
development cycle starts edging towards it's
On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 20:29:29 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 10/18/13, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
As a simple start, did you consider announcing the beta
yourself?
I didn't, because I disliked the current model and tied my
hands when
I saw the new beta
Am Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:45:27 -0700
schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org:
- We do not have any defined release timeline. When is it time to
start prepping for a release? It's up to Walter's arbitrary decision
for when this happens, he doesn't even talk to the community
Am 18.10.2013 20:45, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
Walter and I frequently think of ways to gently steer people toward
working on specific items. Votes, categorization, discussions are of
limited impact. On occasion we've emailed major contributors directly
and asked politely but point blank if
On Oct 19, 2013 10:11 AM, Johannes Pfau nos...@example.com wrote:
Am Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:45:27 -0700
schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org:
- We do not have any defined release timeline. When is it time to
start prepping for a release? It's up to Walter's arbitrary
On 2013-10-17 22:35, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
- Walter is still not tagging the beta releases by the file name (it's
always dmd2beta.zip). I've complained about this several times and
IIRC someone else did as well at dconf (maybe I'm remembering wrong
though). They should at least be named as
On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 06:36:43 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-10-17 22:35, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
- Walter is still not tagging the beta releases by the file
name (it's
always dmd2beta.zip). I've complained about this several times
and
IIRC someone else did as well at dconf (maybe
On 10/17/2013 11:45 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Also, when NOT using the unittest flag, a lot of my code do not compile, symbol
_D6object15__T7reserveTyaZ7reserveFNaNbNeKAyamZm is missing.
See:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11284
On 10/18/13, eles e...@eles.com wrote:
IIRC, Walter wanted that file to always be named dmd.zip or
dmd2.zip or whatever, in order to allow a permanent download
link, while guaranteeing the file to be the latest version of the
tool.
This is the wrong approach. There should be a latest_beta
On 10/18/13 7:08 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 10/18/13, eles e...@eles.com wrote:
IIRC, Walter wanted that file to always be named dmd.zip or
dmd2.zip or whatever, in order to allow a permanent download
link, while guaranteeing the file to be the latest version of the
tool.
This is the wrong
Am 18.10.2013 09:33, schrieb deadalnix:
On Friday, 18 October 2013 at 07:21:47 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/17/2013 11:45 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Also, when NOT using the unittest flag, a lot of my code do not
compile, symbol
_D6object15__T7reserveTyaZ7reserveFNaNbNeKAyamZm is missing.
See:
On Friday, October 18, 2013 08:57:00 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Speaking of which, insisting on using .zip files is another beef I
have with Walter. The whole everyone on Windows is stuck in the 90s
mentality is plain wrong, especially for programmers. 7zip (or Peazip
or whatever) should
On 10/18/13, Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
I don't think that makes a large difference. Probably the better thing
to do is trimming the contents of the archive.
Right, but this is more general. He also dislikes non-zip archives in
bugzilla attachments.
On 18 Oct 2013 19:45, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Friday, October 18, 2013 08:57:00 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Speaking of which, insisting on using .zip files is another beef I
have with Walter. The whole everyone on Windows is stuck in the 90s
mentality is plain
This is a good list of things that we could and should improve. Getting
all minded to perfection would be difficult, but definitely worth living
into.
I appreciate your enthusiasm for and involvement in D. At the top level
a few simple realities need to be understood.
First, there is no OSS
On 10/18/2013 12:33 AM, deadalnix wrote:
I highly doubt that this fit into cases 1 to 4 as you mention. I'll however
double check with that in mind.
I want to know about any other cases, so please investigate.
That also doesn't explain why I get a closure bug (frame pointer or frame
content
On 10/18/2013 11:17 AM, Rory McGuire wrote:
Does it even support executable permissions?
Yes, it does.
On 18 Oct 2013 21:00, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 10/18/2013 11:17 AM, Rory McGuire wrote:
Does it even support executable permissions?
Yes, it does.
Nice. It's there any particular reason you prefer zip?
I guess it's irrelevant what the current format is if we start
I get bitten by it locally too: if there's a test with an
inaccurate sql query with time formatted as string, the sql
server doesn't always compute it, because the default
human-readable time format is taken from the current locale,
and to parse it one first has to guess the format itself,
On 10/18/2013 12:14 PM, Rory McGuire wrote:
Nice. It's there any particular reason you prefer zip?
It's easy and works on all platforms.
I also point out that, for all platforms supported, when we do a release we also
build a custom download package for each platform in that platform's
On 10/18/13, Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
nobody has the time and inclination to actually _be_ the
build czar (which is entirely understandable).
Building something should be a command on the command-line. The whole
issue is about currently having a person in place
On 10/18/2013 1:29 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
But I hope you understand this isn't really about you or Walter not
doing these things yourself, but rather the fact that you didn't seem
to recognize this as being a problem. I've mentioned the build/release
issue many times, and now we finally have
On Friday, October 18, 2013 15:31:05 Walter Bright wrote:
We do need a Build Czar, because the install builds break every time, due to
things like failure to update the manifests, new build targets, new
features, etc. Somebody has to be responsible for getting all the scripts
tested and
On 17 Oct 2013 00:40, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
Walter Bright:
I'll go have myself flogged, then.
But please be gentle and use something soft, like a fake snow leopard
tail:
Surely having to deal with c++ whenever Walter works on dmd is punishment
enough :D.
On 2013-10-16 23:16, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Yes, but after Andej did the great changelog for 2.063, Walter publicly
admitted that he had been wrong about the changelog. Andrej showed Walter that
it _is_ worth doing something more than just a list of bugzilla issues. So, I
would assume that
On 10/16/13, Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com wrote:
That's not a what, that's a who.
- We do not have any vision or major plans ahead for the language.
Currently we're stuck in a bug-driven development environment, where
bugs are arbitrarily picked off of bugzilla and fixed. But there's no
On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 17:41:37 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Hum I have several regression is SDC's test suite. I have to
investigate more to fix the code or submit bug report. It looks
related to AA. What are the changes that affect AA in this new
release ?
It turns out that is is a
On 10/16/13, Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
What are you protesting against?
Walter.
On Saturday, 12 October 2013 at 22:16:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
Current list of regressions:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advancedbug_severity=regressionbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENED
This isn't a
On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 13:34:04 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 10/16/13, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
What are you protesting against?
Walter.
The last change log was awesome.
I vote to get rid of Walter. :)
On 10/16/13 6:33 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 10/16/13, Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
What are you protesting against?
Walter.
That's not a what, that's a who. Would you please elaborate on the what and why? I haven't seen
any obstructionism coming from anyone
On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 20:19:17 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote:
That's not a what, that's a who. Would you please elaborate on
the what and why? I haven't seen any obstructionism coming
from anyone in terms of repeating the previous style for this
releases notes.
Originally Walter
On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 22:28:41 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 20:19:17 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote:
That's not a what, that's a who. Would you please elaborate on
the what and why? I haven't seen any obstructionism coming
from anyone in terms of repeating the
On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 20:28:42 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 20:19:17 UTC, Brad Roberts
wrote:
That's not a what, that's a who. Would you please elaborate
on the what and why? I haven't seen any obstructionism coming
from anyone in terms of
On 10/16/13 2:16 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 22:28:41 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 20:19:17 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote:
That's not a what, that's a who. Would you please elaborate on
the what and why? I haven't seen any obstructionism
On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 20:28:42 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 20:19:17 UTC, Brad Roberts
wrote:
That's not a what, that's a who. Would you please elaborate
on the what and why? I haven't seen any obstructionism coming
from anyone in terms of
On 10/16/2013 6:33 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 10/16/13, Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
What are you protesting against?
Walter.
I'll go have myself flogged, then.
Walter Bright:
I'll go have myself flogged, then.
But please be gentle and use something soft, like a fake snow
leopard tail:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v310/musta.surma/Hpim4850.jpg
Bye,
bearophile
On Saturday, 12 October 2013 at 22:16:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
Current list of regressions:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advancedbug_severity=regressionbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENED
This isn't a
On 2013-10-15 07:16, deadalnix wrote:
This is for that very reason that I prefers to work with timestamps UTC
as much as possible. No timzone hell, no format hell, no nothing. Just
convert from user input directly, and convert back to text just before
output.
Agree. Always work with universal
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 23:13:25 +0200
monarch_dodra monarchdo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 13:25:23 UTC, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
I'm also getting random missing symbol linker errors with both
dmd 2.063.2 and dmd 2.064. But only on 32-bit windows. On
64-bit windows it
On 2013-10-13 00:16, Walter Bright wrote:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
Current list of regressions:
Another one: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11268
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Am 14.10.2013 23:19, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 10/14/2013 6:25 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
I'm also getting random missing symbol linker errors with both dmd
2.063.2 and
dmd 2.064. But only on 32-bit windows. On 64-bit windows it works fine.
This is really frustrating...
Is it possible you are
On 10/15/2013 1:50 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Am 14.10.2013 23:19, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 10/14/2013 6:25 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
I'm also getting random missing symbol linker errors with both dmd
2.063.2 and
dmd 2.064. But only on 32-bit windows. On 64-bit windows it works fine.
This is
Am 15.10.2013 11:25, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 10/15/2013 1:50 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Am 14.10.2013 23:19, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 10/14/2013 6:25 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
I'm also getting random missing symbol linker errors with both dmd
2.063.2 and
dmd 2.064. But only on 32-bit
On 10/15/13 7:15 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 10/13/13, Tourist grava...@gravatar.com wrote:
I'm wondering whether there will be the nifty changelog like it
was for 2.063?
Andrej? :D
We'll see if someone else volunteers to do it. I'm not doing it out of protest.
What are you protesting
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
