: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of
lauren_cr...@amat.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 2:03 PM
To: oconne...@tamuracorp.com; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: CE Mark with exclamation mark
Keep in mind there is also an bold-exclamation-mark-inside-a-bold-circle
-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Brian Oconnell
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 2:43 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: CE Mark with exclamation mark
The '!' notation is typically used within triangle (ISO symbol 0434) to
indicate that there is something important that the operator needs
The '!' notation is typically used within triangle (ISO symbol 0434) to
indicate that there is something important that the operator needs to read
about; or that it is being used to indicate special components on a PCB.
Is a stand-alone '!' being proposed? Did they refer to a symbol out of
Hello Peter,
I recommend reviewing the Blue Guide h
tp://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/s
ngle-market-goods/files/blue-guide/guidepublic_en.pdf . Section 5.4
describes the EC declaration of conformity, and sections 3.1 through 3.3 will
describe the roles related to the manufacturer,
Peter,
The Machinery Directive Guide gives excellent guidance on these sorts of
questions à http://www.cen.eu/cen/Sect
rs/Sectors/Machinery/Documents/guide_ap
lication_directive_2006-42-ec-2nd_edit_6-2010_en.pdf
Search on “established outside the EU”.
It can be a tricky point, but a
Woodgate
Verzonden: Thursday, December 09, 2010 10:44 PM
Aan: emc-p...@ieee.org
Onderwerp: Re: CE Mark on Transmitter Modules
In message
AANLkTi=ZrhV-OUORQM91HxQRbujdBrxhBk=-pslbb...@mail.gmail.com, dated
Thu, 9 Dec 2010, Grace Lin graceli...@gmail.com writes:
1. For the module to be installed
In message
AANLkTi=ZrhV-OUORQM91HxQRbujdBrxhBk=-pslbb...@mail.gmail.com, dated
Thu, 9 Dec 2010, Grace Lin graceli...@gmail.com writes:
1. For the module to be installed in lighting equipment, does EN55015
emission standard apply?
EN 55015 applies to the whole product, not to individual
Grace
RTTE is good enough as it references the EMC and the LVD without the voltage
limits. Your standards seem to be correct, emissions are covered in the 489
standard. Safety is required even though you only have 3.3 V
Best Regards
Peter Merguerian
Peter@Goglobal http://compliance.com
Thank you very much, Gert.
For a 3.3Vdc input 2.4GHz DSSS transmitter module (physical size 1 x 2):
1. For the module to be installed in lighting equipment, does EN55015 emission
standard apply?
2. How to apply ESD, EFT, Surge, voltage dips and short interruptions to a
transmitter module?
Yes, the ce mark is granted under the RTTE directive, but the basic
requirements of the LVD and EMC directive
apply by their standards being listed under the RTTE directive also.
Choose your standards from the list of harmonized standards for the RTTE
directive.
If this is a short range
Roger,
The European Power Supply Manufacturer's Association has a guidance document
http://www.epsma.org/pdf/CE%20Marking_March%202002.pdf
Best Regards,
Peter
roger...@astec-asia.com wrote:
Hi,
An adaptor (stand-alone power supply unit) is required to CE mark to the Low
Voltage
In message 200604281522.k3sfmdjq014...@smtp41.singnet.com.sg, dated
Fri, 28 Apr 2006, kohscp koh...@singnet.com.sg writes
All the response is not going convince the management guys. A real life
case of penalty (or some sort of prosecution case) would be more
effective in putting the message
; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: CE mark 5mm height
I have personally been involved in an instance of a CE mark being called out
by customs authorities for being too small. The device had a surface area of
15cm^2 The mark was about 3mm, and the action was resolved with an agreement
to correct
In message
4be0b2b96f73e3448c6f86309fc15ca6035ca...@iticpm01.innotek-inc.com,
dated Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Clif Brick clif.br...@invisibletech.com writes
I have personally been involved in an instance of a CE mark being
called out by customs authorities for being too small. The device had a
surface
I have personally been involved in an instance of a CE mark being called out
by customs authorities for being too small. The device had a surface area of
15cm^2 The mark was about 3mm, and the action was resolved with an agreement
to correct the label on future shipments. Customs officials are
Sent: 28 April 2006 12:03
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: CE mark 5mm height
In message f49bf8e684bc6c4188d1d63513c4ca07a47...@sparrow.dolby.net,
dated Fri, 28 Apr 2006, James, Chris c...@dolby.co.uk writes
Mark must be 5mm but when it won't fit may be applied to the
packaging/accompanying
In message f49bf8e684bc6c4188d1d63513c4ca07a47...@sparrow.dolby.net,
dated Fri, 28 Apr 2006, James, Chris c...@dolby.co.uk writes
Mark must be 5mm but when it won't fit may be applied to the
packaging/accompanying docs:
http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/faq/ce-mark.htm
This whole thing is
Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf
Of James,
Chris
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 10:37
To: Nick Williams; kohscp
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: CE mark 5mm height
Mark must be 5mm but when it won't fit may be applied to the
packaging
...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: CE mark 5mm height
From the Commission's Guide to the implementation of directives
based on the New Approach and the Global Approach:
According to the Directives relating to machinery, personal
protective equipment, active implantable medical devices, medical
devices
Koh
Many Directives also include the statement, The minimum size requirement may
be waived for small scale equipment. This really means that if the equipment
is large enough to receive a 5mm mark, then that is what it should be, but if
the equipment is very small, then the size of the mark may
From the Commission's Guide to the implementation of directives
based on the New Approach and the Global Approach:
According to the Directives relating to machinery, personal
protective equipment, active implantable medical devices, medical
devices, potentially explosives [sic] atmospheres,
In message 200604272154.k3rlsapx025...@smtp17.singnet.com.sg, dated
Fri, 28 Apr 2006, kohscp koh...@singnet.com.sg writes
But however, I?ve seen lots of products bearing CE logo which is
definitely lesser than 5mm height.
Such as some electronic products, toy product and on my desk a
:54 PM
To: POWELL, DOUG
Subject: RE: CE Mark disambiguation
Doug:
Article 10(1) of the EMC Directive http
//europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/electr_equipment/emc/directiv/text.htm has
this statement:
Member States shall take the necessary measures to prohibit the affixing to
apparatus, its
Jim,
We do this all the time. We make one version of the product and have internal
jumpers or selectors for various line voltages and frequencies. We also have
built-in detection so it won't run on voltage or frequency it is not supposed
to. So our products are hard-wired (so-to-speak) for say
If it complies with the directives you can legitimately put the CE
mark on it wherever you are selling it.
We have helped CE mark plenty of 110V products which were sold in the
EU (this voltage is commonly used on construction sites in the UK).
Some of these were 60Hz products which we tested
Jim Eichner jim.eich...@xantrex.com wrote (in
2147f6d97127f6428e40ff35ea522b9701e75...@xbc-mail1.xantrex.com) about
'CE Mark for other jurisdictions', on Fri, 12 Aug 2005:
From a number of responses I've had already I need to clarify that the
product will be fully compliant with the applicable
From a number of responses I've had already I need to clarify that the
product will be fully compliant with the applicable EU Directives and
EN's needed for a valid CE Mark.
The only question is whether there's anything wrong with the use of the
CE Mark on a product that is not for sale in the
Jim Eichner jim.eich...@xantrex.com wrote (in
2147f6d97127f6428e40ff35ea522b9701e75...@xbc-mail1.xantrex.com) about
'CE Mark for other jurisdictions', on Fri, 12 Aug 2005:
Are there any EU rules that would stop us from CE-marking a product
designed for and sold in a non-EU country that says
dfra...@lucent.com
-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@listserv.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@listserv.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Nick Williams
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 5:29 PM
To: jeff collins
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject:Re: CE Mark for Older Equipment Parts
If you can, send them to a UK office and ask them to arrange onward
shipment to the French customer. Ensure the UK company's name appears
on the shipping paperwork, not your USA address. That way, the French
Customs will see a shipment which has come from elsewhere within the
EU, not one which has
In article g6d0oabiqiacf...@jmwa.demon.co.uk, John Woodgate
j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk writes
In article 20050201220901.81424.qm...@web50606.mail.yahoo.com, jeff
collins jeffcollin...@yahoo.com writes
I think I already know the answer to this question but I would like to
bounce it off this forum to get
In article 20050201220901.81424.qm...@web50606.mail.yahoo.com, jeff
collins jeffcollin...@yahoo.com writes
I think I already know the answer to this question but I would like to
bounce it off this forum to get a solid consensus or find a plausible
loop hole. I have a customer that has a piece of
Charles you have hit upon a loop hole you can drive a truck through. The
local merchants have created designer stylized machines that don't come close
to meeting any legal requirements. More often than not this type device finds
it way into the home where it interferes with radio and TV alike.
Charles you have hit upon a loop hole you can drive a truck through. The
local merchants have created designer stylized machines that don't come close
to meeting any legal requirements. More often than not this type device finds
it way into the home where it interferes with radio and TV alike.
In article 2EC9D5B6733DE64BB79CEB13AC874A1A06C1C321@riv-
excha2.echostar.com, Grasso, Charles charles.gra...@echostar.com
writes
Can someone please update me on the CE mark compliance
requirements with homebuilt PCs?
Although the Directive has weasel words about 'radio amateurs', the
Charles,
First thing to remember is that CE+CE does not always =CE. Secondly if you use
the FCC thearoy this is perfectly acceptable from what I remember. As for the
EU it is hard to say. I would think you could get away with it provided you
are not selling the unit.
Regards,
Josh
This
to:
Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org
Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Title: RE: CE Mark on components
http://www.ieee-pses.org/symposium
http://www.emc2004.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@listserv.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Barker, Neil
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 11:40 AM
To: 'drcuthb...@micron.com'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: CE Mark on components
Definitely not. ICs (and most other components for that matter) do not
fall within the scope of any
http://www.ieee-pses.org/symposium http://www.emc2004.org/
--
Definitely not. ICs (and most other components for that matter) do not fall
within the scope of any Directive. They do not have an intrinsic function as
they need to be installed in a
http://www.ieee-pses.org/symposium
http://www.emc2004.org/
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 10:25:07AM -0600, drcuthb...@micron.com wrote:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/symposium http://www.emc2004.org/
--
Once again I have been asked
I don't want to self-certify and so a competent body looks like the way
to go.
Dave,
As I understand the EMCD, the manufacturer is the only person responsible
for the conformity of the apparatus, so he (or his authorized
representative in the EEA) has to issues a written EC Declaration of
don't want
to self-certify and so a competent body looks like the way to go.
Dave Cuthbert
Micron Technology
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 2:24 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: CE mark on development/evaluation boards ?
I
From: John Woodgate
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 1:24 PM
Peter L. Tarver peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com wrote:
I also have a current need for this information and would
appreciate being copied on anything off the list.
Why off-list? It seems to me that a lot of people
would be interested
I also have a current need for this information and would
appreciate being copied on anything off the list.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
-Original Message-
From:
I read in !emc-pstc that Peter L. Tarver peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
wrote (in nebbkemlgllmjofmoplememaeeaa.peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com)
about 'CE mark on development/evaluation boards ?' on Fri, 7 Mar 2003:
I also have a current need for this information and would
appreciate being copied on
Hello Anthony,
I have experience of such a product (7 years ago). Compliance to the EMC
Directive was achieved through the Technical Construction File route with
guidance from a Competent Body.
Emission testing was performed with scope probes and logic analyser looms
attached as well as any
AM
To: 'Peter L. Tarver'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Twisting the LVD (was: RE: CE Mark vs. e-Mark)
Peter
I think that your question is answered quite clearly in the second paragraph
that I quoted from the guidelines, where it states:
'Following discussions with Member States
I read in !emc-pstc that John Allen john.al...@era.co.uk wrote (in
BFE68AB0084CD311B4FB00508B014C8703CF9C54@MERCURY) about 'CE Mark vs.
e-Mark' on Wed, 9 Oct 2002:
Having discussed the subject with John Woodgate before sending this message,
I have now to correct his statement below that the
I read in !emc-pstc that Barker, Neil neil.bar...@e2vtechnologies.com
wrote (in 4f826f960057d4118ec3009027e2453808a51...@whl17.eev.uk) about
'CE Mark vs. e-Mark' on Wed, 9 Oct 2002:
The second draft of the Revised Guidelines from LVD, published in May 2000
following the Think Tank Meeting of 27th
KT22 7SA
Tel:+44 (0) 1372-367025 (Direct)
+44 (0) 1372-367000 (Switchboard)
Fax:+44 (0) 1372-367102 (Fax)
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: 09 October 2002 08:37
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: CE Mark vs. e-Mark
I
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 12:37 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: CE Mark vs. e-Mark
Although the wording of the LVD implies that
the voltage limits
apply to internally-generated voltages, there is
now an official
'interpretation' that they apply only to supply
I read in !emc-pstc that Barker, Neil neil.bar...@e2vtechnologies.com
wrote (in 4f826f960057d4118ec3009027e2453808a51...@whl17.eev.uk) about
'CE Mark vs. e-Mark' on Wed, 9 Oct 2002:
My understanding is that the latest interpretation is that the LVD applies
to all input or output voltages, i.e.
I read in !emc-pstc that Jim Eichner jim.eich...@xantrex.com wrote (in
67C475A5ECE7D4118AEC0002B325CAB603510F93@BCMAIL1) about 'CE Mark vs.
e-Mark' on Tue, 8 Oct 2002:
By the way, the LVD is in fact
applicable, because the product in question creates 120Vac from the 12Vdc it
gets from the car.
AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: CE Mark vs. e-Mark
I read in !emc-pstc that Jim Eichner jim.eich...@xantrex.com wrote (in
67C475A5ECE7D4118AEC0002B325CAB603510F7E@BCMAIL1) about 'CE Mark vs.
e-Mark' on Mon, 7 Oct 2002:
However using the CE Mark requires using all applicable
I read in !emc-pstc that John Allen john.al...@era.co.uk wrote (in
BFE68AB0084CD311B4FB00508B014C8703CF9C3B@MERCURY) about 'CE Mark vs.
e-Mark' on Tue, 8 Oct 2002:
I agree with your comments about the AEMC Directive, but not (in general)
with those about the LVD for the simple practical fact
I read in !emc-pstc that Jim Eichner jim.eich...@xantrex.com wrote (in
67C475A5ECE7D4118AEC0002B325CAB603510F7E@BCMAIL1) about 'CE Mark vs.
e-Mark' on Mon, 7 Oct 2002:
However using the CE Mark requires using all applicable
directives,
True, but, as you just said, the EMCD is NOT applicable.
--
Jim
I agree with your comments about the AEMC Directive, but not (in general)
with those about the LVD for the simple practical fact that the (current)
nominal voltage limit for the latter is 50Vac/75Vdc - and few vehicle
supplies are that high.
About the only cases where I can see the LVD
2002 14:43
To: emc-pstc
Cc: Bill Ellingford; 'Russell'
Subject: Re: CE Mark on Product Packaging
Correct me if I am wrong, but I do not believe the statement below is
entirely
correct. It is my understanding (per EMC directive and published
guidelines)
that the Manufacturer or Authorized
to create the
full URL.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
Tyco International
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lemon [mailto:sle...@caspiannetworks.com]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 9:43 AM
To: emc-pstc
Cc: Bill Ellingford; 'Russell'
Subject: Re: CE Mark on Product Packaging
Correct me if I
Correct me if I am wrong, but I do not believe the statement below is entirely
correct. It is my understanding (per EMC directive and published guidelines)
that the Manufacturer or Authorized Representative is responsible for affixing
the CE marking and drawing up the DoC and that only the
I beleive the change in stance is due to the change in requirement regarding
a European presence. Under the EMC directive, the person making a DOC and
placing the goods on the market would be an EU resident. The RTTE allows
parties outside of the EU to make the DOC and hold the Technical file,
Russell,
The RTTE CE-marking includes a character (!) if geographical or
TELCO-interface restrictions. LVD/EMC CE-marking is simply 'CE', no extra
information.
The compulsory RTTE marking is good; no one wants customers to break seals
on retail packages to find whether RTTE products have
John
We often come across large systems or machines where we ask the
manufacturer for certification details for the components, they sometimes
are unable to get much information from their suppliers, a common example
is for transformers where it is unlikely that they have been tested, except
as
I read in !emc-pstc that i...@uk.tuv.com wrote (in OF47447D6C.F0A6BF4C-
on80256b05.00425...@jpn.tuv.com) about 'CE-mark compliance', on Thu, 15
Nov 2001:
Test houses generally do
not accept a Declaration of Conformity for any product unless further proof
is available in the form of acceptable
Look in the archives of this discussion forum and you will see instances of
occassions where no testing has been conducted. Test houses generally do
not accept a Declaration of Conformity for any product unless further proof
is available in the form of acceptable test results (from a 3rd party
Amund:
In answer to your question, I would cite the words of President
Ronald Reagan, quoting Chairman Gorbachev, quoting V.I. Lenin:
Doveryay, no proveryay. - Trust, but verify.
Regards,
Jack
Jacob Z. Schanker, P.E.
65 Crandon Way
Rochester, NY 14618
Phone: 716 442 3909
Fax: 716 442 2182
I read in !emc-pstc that am...@westin-emission.no wrote (in LFENJLPMMJB
mhpeibnilieagcbaa.am...@westin-emission.no) about 'CE-mark compliance',
on Wed, 14 Nov 2001:
Hi all,
Do all manufactures fulfill the EU-directives with testing in their own
facilities or by an independent test lab? I guess
Amund
Do you mean just the CE Mark, or the CE Mark accompanied by the appropriate
DoC?
Here is a an example of what can happen if you accept the Mark on its own,
A few years ago, in a well-publised legal case in the UK, a PC reseller had
his own badge placed on the equipment. However, when
In the past I had been involved with integration of standalone products
into a larger system. Ultimately my larger system would be required to
be tested, and I would want it to pass.
As the customer who would integrate production quantities of the
standalone, I asked for the report. Those that
...@majordomo.ieee.org'
Subject: Re: CE Mark
Actually.
Certification Body, as in National Certification Body (NCB) .
Tania Grant taniagrant%msn@interlock.lexmark.com on 09/12/2001 12:38:50
AM
Please respond to Tania Grant taniagrant%msn@interlock.lexmark.com
To: Gary McInturff
...@ultronics.co.uk]
Sent: September 13, 2001 12:38 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: CE Mark
Hi Ralph,
The CE mark is not exclusive to EMC. Indeed, it refers to compliance with
all directives relevant to the product, so a teddy bear will be CE marked if
it meets the requirements of the toy
]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 7:42 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: CE Mark and GOST
Hi John,
I am not familiar with GOST and I don't doubt there are people on
this forum
better informed to address your query. What I do know
PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: CE Mark
Hi Ralph,
The CE mark is not exclusive to EMC. Indeed, it refers to compliance with
all directives relevant to the product, so a teddy bear will be CE marked if
it meets the requirements of the toy directive and all relevant safety
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:37:31 +0100 Chris Chileshe
chris.chile...@ultronics.co.uk wrote:
However, the CE mark is a declaration of conformity and you can self certify.
Self certify ? Yes, that is OK for LVD- and EMC directives. But a lot of the EU
directives require work/certification from a
; 'pettit, ghery'; 'chris maxwell'; 'chris
chileshe'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: CE Mark
I recall in the bad old days that Herb Mertel of EMACO, Inc. (an EMI test
house in San Diego, since become a TUV affiliate) provided VDE specs
translated into English as one of their products. I
...@intel.com, 'Chris Maxwell' chris.maxw...@nettest.com,
'Chris Chileshe' chris.chile...@ultronics.co.uk,
emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: CE Mark
Date: Thu, Sep 13, 2001, 4:39 PM
False - you have never worked under French - German and Italian standards
ALL in their native languages
: Thursday, September 13, 2001 12:37 PM
Subject: RE: CE Mark
Hi Ralph,
The CE mark is not exclusive to EMC. Indeed, it refers to compliance with
all directives relevant to the product, so a teddy bear will be CE marked
if
it meets the requirements of the toy directive and all relevant safety
...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: CE Mark
Date: Thu, Sep 13, 2001, 10:48 AM
Chris,
This is why I refer to the EMC Directive as the EMC Professionals
Employment Act of 1989. If they did away with these regulations, we'd all
have to actually work for a living. Long life the regulators
...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: CE Mark
I'll tell you what CE means.
It means Continued Employment for Compliance Engineers so that we
can Continue to Eat.
That's about the size of it. No shipments to Europe equals no business
equals no job. So do the tests, document your tests, put
Chileshe; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject:Re: CE Mark
I think its fair to state that CE also equates to designed in level of
immunity to electromagnetic interference, i.e. reduced sensitivity or
susceptibility. In my view , a highly desireable because it prevents a lot
of what's out
Subject: RE: CE Mark
This understanding (appended e-mail below) is correct AFAIK. I also
checked
out the website http://www.conformance.co.uk and they seem to agree with
the notion it doesn't really mean anything *any more*. Here is an excerpt
from
their site ..
.
We
employer!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Maxwell [mailto:chris.maxw...@nettest.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 8:09 AM
To: Chris Chileshe; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: CE Mark
I'll tell you what CE means.
It means Continued Employment for Compliance Engineers so that we
-p...@majordomo.ieee.org'
Subject: RE: CE Mark
This understanding (appended e-mail below) is correct AFAIK. I also
checked
out the website http://www.conformance.co.uk and they seem to agree
with
the notion it doesn't really mean anything *any more*. Here is an
excerpt
from
To: Jody Leber
Cc: 'emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org'
Subject:Re: CE Mark
Hi Jody
According to sources within the European Commission the letters CE now have
no
meaning. Communitie European seems to have been assumed from the inception
of
the directives but now CE means CE.
Slaint
I have always thought that CE was an abbreviation for an English of French
expression. But if CE is only CE according to the European Commission, that is
news...
Can someone from the European Commission confirm this?
Best regards
Amund Westin, Oslo/Norway
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001 14:44:08
Actually it is Compliance Europeene.
Regards,
Tom Smith
Manager, Homologation and Safety
Sanmina Canada ULC
Phone (403) 295-5156
Cell Phone (403) 875-1291
FAX (403) 295-8862
Email: tom.sm...@sanmina.com
-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
as in CB Scheme???
Certified Body.
taniagr...@msn.com
- Original Message -
From: Gary McInturff
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 5:04 PM
To: 'Jody Leber'; 'emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org'
Subject: RE: CE Mark
Okay, now how about CB
Gary
-Original Message
Okay, now how about CB
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Jody Leber [mailto:jle...@ustech-lab.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:13 AM
To: 'emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org'
Subject: CE Mark
Update on what CE stands for according to the compliance community:
1. Conformite
Leber jle...@ustech-lab.com
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 8:23 AM
Subject: Re: CE Mark
Jody,
I seem to recall that CE is for European Community but in Frech, i.e.
Communite European. You can try looking around the EU website:
http://europa.eu.int/comm
Hi Jody
According to sources within the European Commission the letters CE now have no
meaning. Communitie European seems to have been assumed from the inception of
the directives but now CE means CE.
Slainté Mhath
William McCafferty
Safety Quality Manager
Nikon Precision Europe
Tel:
I have kept this link handy in case anyone ever asked me what CE stood for.
http://www.conformance.co.uk/CE_MARKING/CELOGO/ce_logo.html
John Juhasz
Fiber Options
Bohemia, NY
-Original Message-
From: Jody Leber [mailto:jle...@ustech-lab.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 7:31 AM
To:
Jody,
I seem to recall that CE is for European Community but in Frech, i.e.
Communite European. You can try looking around the EU website:
http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/newapproach/legislation/guide/legislation.htm
George
Jody Leber jleber%ustech-lab@interlock.lexmark.com
Jody,
CE is an abbreviation of a French phrase Conformite Europeene. I have
seen this on multiple websites but here is one for reference.
http://www.ce-mark.com/cedoc.html
Regards,
Mark
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
I read in !emc-pstc that Dave Hutchins hutch...@protek-tvs.com wrote
(in 01c12740.dd271200.hutch...@protek-tvs.com) about 'CE Mark for AC
Power Line Protection Module', on Fri, 17 Aug 2001:
Dose anyone know what directive or EN standard is required for applying the CE
mark to an AC Power Line
Posted for Dan Sicard:
From: Daniel Sicard dsic...@reltectransport.com
Subject: Re: CE mark self certification
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 09:45:14 -0500
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Hi, group,
I have heard an interpretation which was saying that only a CB
...@aol.com[SMTP:lfresea...@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 1999 12:51 PM
To: rehel...@mmm.com; jjuh...@fiberoptions.com
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: CE mark self certification
Chaps,
What in particular about a TCF contect puzzles you?
Derek.
Owner L F Research EMC Design and Test Facility
@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Tuesday, March 02, 1999 12:24 PM
Subject: RE: CE mark self certification
Dan,
I have to agree with Rich Nute of HP (message below), but I would like to
add to it.
Unless you have had experience creating a decent TCF and have a good
example
of one, it would be wise, at least
...@ieee.org
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Tuesday, March 02, 1999 12:24 PM
Subject: RE: CE mark self certification
Dan,
I have to agree with Rich Nute of HP (message below), but I would like to
add to it.
Unless you have had experience creating a decent TCF and have a good
example
of one
Derek, thanks for the TCF information.
This brings up another question I have concerning EMC test reports in
general.
When there was basically only the Europe and the U.S. to be specifically
tested for, we produced two test reports tailored to these areas (graphs
and limit lines, test setups,
...@majordomo.ieee.org
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 04:19:42 -0600
Subject: Re: CE mark self certification
Reply-to: rehel...@mmm.com
Derek, thanks for the TCF information.
This brings up another question I have concerning EMC test reports in
general.
When there was basically only
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
