On Monday, March 17, 2014 2:18:58 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 17 Mar 2014, at 17:50, Craig Weinberg wrote:
I'm mirroring back to you what my impression is of what you say to me. I
say it is obvious that machines are impersonal, cold, mechanical, and that
it is obvious
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 3:41:30 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 Mar 2014, at 05:17, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, March 15, 2014 7:00:48 PM UTC-4, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
Craig,
Hmmm, let me see. If I just take my eye out of its socket and turn it
around then I guess
in that
awareness.
Craig
Edgar
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 12:17:47 AM UTC-4, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, March 15, 2014 7:00:48 PM UTC-4, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
Craig,
Hmmm, let me see. If I just take my eye out of its socket and turn it
around then I guess by your theory I'd have self
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 3:40:49 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 15 Mar 2014, at 23:09, Craig Weinberg wrote:
http://www.jesseengland.net/index.php?/project/vide-uhhh/
Have a look at this quick video (or get the idea from this_)
Since the VCR can get video feedback of itself
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 1:02:08 AM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 14 March 2014 13:12, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com
javascript:wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZH2QXQu-HGE
A brief, handy rebuttal to materialistic views of consciousness. I would
go further, and say
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 10:02:04 AM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On Monday, March 17, 2014, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 1:02:08 AM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 14 March 2014 13:12, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
http
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 11:05:45 AM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Friday, March 14, 2014 5:11:56 AM UTC-4, Kim Jones wrote:
On 14 Mar 2014, at 1:12 pm, Craig Weinberg whats
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 11:38:41 AM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 11:05:45 AM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Craig
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 12:08:00 PM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 11:38:41 AM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
wrote:
If there is nothing other than sensing
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 12:05:50 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 Mar 2014, at 13:52, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 3:41:30 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 Mar 2014, at 05:17, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, March 15, 2014 7:00:48 PM UTC-4, Edgar L
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 3:26:46 PM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 12:08:00 PM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Craig
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 4:38:42 PM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 3:26:46 PM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
At this point my impression
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 6:21:18 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On Monday, March 17, 2014, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 10:02:04 AM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On Monday, March 17, 2014, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday
On Friday, March 14, 2014 5:11:56 AM UTC-4, Kim Jones wrote:
On 14 Mar 2014, at 1:12 pm, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Information must be made evident through sensory participation, or it is
nothing at all.
Craig, you have just explained to me the basis of my
On Friday, March 14, 2014 6:23:13 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
I'm not sure I'm convinced by the video. Why can't the brain think it's
about something ?
Because it doesn't need to. A coffee filter has an effect of coffee, but
that doesn't mean that the filter intends to 'make coffee' or is
On Friday, March 14, 2014 9:50:17 AM UTC-4, ghi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, March 14, 2014 2:12:15 AM UTC, Craig Weinberg wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZH2QXQu-HGE
A brief, handy rebuttal to materialistic views of consciousness. I would
go further, and say that information
https://31.media.tumblr.com/935c9f6ad77f94164442956d8929da19/tumblr_mncj8t2OCc1qz63ydo10_250.gif
http://www.jesseengland.net/index.php?/project/vide-uhhh/
Have a look at this quick video (or get the idea from this_)
Since the VCR can get video feedback of itself, is there any computational
On Saturday, March 15, 2014 8:15:01 PM UTC-4, ghi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, March 15, 2014 6:08:15 PM UTC, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Friday, March 14, 2014 9:50:17 AM UTC-4, ghi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, March 14, 2014 2:12:15 AM UTC, Craig Weinberg wrote:
http
in the mirror doesn't have self-awareness?
Edgar
On Saturday, March 15, 2014 6:09:27 PM UTC-4, Craig Weinberg wrote:
https://31.media.tumblr.com/935c9f6ad77f94164442956d8929da19/tumblr_mncj8t2OCc1qz63ydo10_250.gif
http://www.jesseengland.net/index.php?/project/vide-uhhh/
Have a look
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZH2QXQu-HGE
A brief, handy rebuttal to materialistic views of consciousness. I would go
further, and say that information, even though it is immaterial in its
conception, is still derived from the principles of object interaction.
Even when forms and functions
On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 12:10:31 PM UTC-4, Terren Suydam wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Sure, consciousness here-and-now is undoubtable. But the p refers to the
contents of consciousness, which is not undoubtable in many cases. I am in
pain cannot be doubted when one is feeling it, but other felt
On Monday, March 10, 2014 5:48:42 AM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 7 March 2014 15:46, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
If the doctor became more ambitious, and decided to replace a species
with a simulation, we have a ready example of what it might be like. Cars
have
On Friday, March 7, 2014 3:06:54 AM UTC-5, cdemorsella wrote:
*From:* everyth...@googlegroups.com javascript: [mailto:
everyth...@googlegroups.com javascript:] *On Behalf Of *Craig Weinberg
*Sent:* Thursday, March 06, 2014 8:46 PM
*To:* everyth...@googlegroups.com javascript
On Friday, March 7, 2014 7:14:15 AM UTC-5, telmo_menezes wrote:
Hi Craig,
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
If the doctor became more ambitious, and decided to replace a species
with a simulation, we have a ready example of what
On Friday, March 7, 2014 7:21:15 AM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
All,
An empty space within which events occur does not exist. There is no
universal fixed pre-existing empty space common to all events and observers.
I agree.
Why? Because we cannot establish its existence by any
On Friday, March 7, 2014 3:52:33 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
On 8 March 2014 01:21, Edgar L. Owen edga...@att.net javascript:wrote:
All,
An empty space within which events occur does not exist. There is no
universal fixed pre-existing empty space common to all events and observers.
Why?
On Friday, March 7, 2014 5:02:51 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
On 8 March 2014 10:29, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
On Friday, March 7, 2014 3:52:33 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
On 8 March 2014 01:21, Edgar L. Owen edga...@att.net wrote:
All,
An empty space within which
If the doctor became more ambitious, and decided to replace a species with
a simulation, we have a ready example of what it might be like. Cars have
replaced the functionality of horses in human society. They reproduce in a
different, more centralized way, but otherwise they move around like
On Wednesday, March 5, 2014 2:20:01 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 04 Mar 2014, at 19:14, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, March 4, 2014 3:27:58 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 03 Mar 2014, at 21:17, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Why don't we see such a (meta) link
On Tuesday, March 4, 2014 3:27:58 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 03 Mar 2014, at 21:17, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, March 3, 2014 1:16:49 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 02 Mar 2014, at 17:42, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, March 2, 2014 3:50:07 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal
On Tuesday, March 4, 2014 1:05:57 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Edgar,
In this list we are open minded and basically agnostic, we don't a priori
assume god, matter, universe, numbers, or whatever, and then try theories
by making clear the assumptions.
The a priori assumption is that
On Monday, March 3, 2014 1:16:49 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 02 Mar 2014, at 17:42, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, March 2, 2014 3:50:07 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Mar 2014, at 12:24, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, March 1, 2014 1:52:12 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal
On Sunday, March 2, 2014 3:46:07 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Mar 2014, at 12:08, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, March 1, 2014 3:12:49 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Mar 2014, at 02:36, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Friday, February 28, 2014 5:32:48 PM
On Sunday, March 2, 2014 3:50:07 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Mar 2014, at 12:24, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, March 1, 2014 1:52:12 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 28 Feb 2014, at 03:22, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:03:15 PM UTC-5, Liz R
On Sunday, March 2, 2014 11:34:33 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
ptruth
Bpbeliefs
Bp pknowledge
Bp p observations
Bp p p sensations
I would invert this of course. We do not know that the universe begins with
'truth'. Truth is a belief about what a sensation
On Sunday, March 2, 2014 11:54:21 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 02 Mar 2014, at 17:10, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, March 2, 2014 3:46:07 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Mar 2014, at 12:08, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, March 1, 2014 3:12:49 AM
On Sunday, March 2, 2014 3:54:25 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 3/2/2014 8:34 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 02 Mar 2014, at 13:36, ghi...@gmail.com javascript: wrote:
So, why do we get tired, and why is being tired like the way that it
is? If its
exhaustion, maybe up a couple of
On Sunday, March 2, 2014 5:34:50 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
On 3 March 2014 07:53, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
Sometimes you have to set logic aside to come to your senses.
Why do I get a McCoy - Spock vibe here?
Fascinating suggestion, Doctor, but completely
On Sunday, March 2, 2014 6:47:51 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
On 3 March 2014 12:21, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
On Sunday, March 2, 2014 5:34:50 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
On 3 March 2014 07:53, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
Sometimes you have to set logic
On Friday, February 28, 2014 9:48:48 PM UTC-5, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
wrote:
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Friday, February 28, 2014 5:32:48 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
If it's all math, then where does math come from
On Friday, February 28, 2014 10:27:46 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
On 1 March 2014 14:36, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
On Friday, February 28, 2014 5:32:48 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
If it's all math, then where does math come from?
Strange to say, elementary maths just
On Saturday, March 1, 2014 3:12:49 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Mar 2014, at 02:36, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Friday, February 28, 2014 5:32:48 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
If it's all math, then where does math come from?
Strange to say, elementary maths just appears to be a fact
On Saturday, March 1, 2014 1:46:44 AM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
On 1 March 2014 19:04, meekerdb meek...@verizon.net javascript: wrote:
On 2/28/2014 9:22 PM, LizR wrote:
Nevertheless, it does seem to be. That is, 17 is a prime number
regardless of whether anyone knows it is, or even knows
On Friday, February 28, 2014 9:18:29 PM UTC-5, Russell Standish wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 10:51:00AM -0500, spudb...@aol.com
javascript:wrote:
Ok, Thanks. We're back to the Observer again, where all things are
decided at the quantum. From here on the questions tumble forth as a
On Saturday, March 1, 2014 1:52:12 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 28 Feb 2014, at 03:22, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:03:15 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
On 28 February 2014 03:02, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
In other words, why, in a functionalist
On Saturday, March 1, 2014 1:57:45 AM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
On 28 February 2014 15:22, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:03:15 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
On 28 February 2014 03:02, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
In other words
On Friday, February 28, 2014 3:31:25 PM UTC-5, stathisp wrote:
On Friday, February 28, 2014, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 7:54:53 PM UTC-5, stathisp wrote:
On 28 February 2014 01:05, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote
On Saturday, March 1, 2014 8:00:54 AM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
Bruno,
This is incorrect. We know truth by its consistency across scope.
How do we know consistency though? Isn't the ability to detect and
interpret consistency (through sense and sense-making) more primitive than
the
On Saturday, March 1, 2014 7:42:13 PM UTC-5, stathisp wrote:
On Saturday, March 1, 2014, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Saturday, March 1, 2014 1:57:45 AM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
On 28 February 2014 15:22, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday
On Saturday, March 1, 2014 7:48:42 PM UTC-5, stathisp wrote:
On Saturday, March 1, 2014, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Friday, February 28, 2014 3:31:25 PM UTC-5, stathisp wrote:
On Friday, February 28, 2014, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote
On Saturday, March 1, 2014 7:56:15 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
Excuse my ignorance, but what is this functionalism that is supposedly
disproved by AHS?
Functionalism, as I see it, is the philosophy that consciousness is purely
a byproduct of specific functions, either physical or mathematical
On Friday, February 28, 2014 8:46:47 AM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
Chris,
For a computational universe to even exist it must be consistently
logico-mathematical. If it weren't the inconsistencies would cause it to
tear itself apart and thus it couldn't exist.
Unless consistency
anthropomorphic than mechanemorphic, it has nothing to do with human
experience in particular. It is 'reality' which is anthropomorphized - I
submit that the foundation of the universe transcends realism.
Thanks,
Craig
Best,
Edgar
On Friday, February 28, 2014 9:29:14 AM UTC-5, Craig
On Friday, February 28, 2014 8:29:52 AM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 27 February 2014 16:43, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 9:47:33 AM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 27 February 2014 14:02, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 7:30:22 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
On 28 February 2014 12:36, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Identity isn't self contained in MSR. All identity is leased within some
perspective. The more common the perspective, the longer the lease
On Friday, February 28, 2014 5:04:29 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
John,
I agree that the substrate that information manifests in is NOT physical,
it is abstract in the sense of no physicality. But the information that
constitutes the universe is REAL, so the substrate it exists within
On Friday, February 28, 2014 5:32:48 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
If it's all math, then where does math come from?
Strange to say, elementary maths just appears to be a fact. That is, it is
a fact that 1+1=2.
These shapes appear to be letters and words also, but they aren't. All it
takes is
participation. R-Math is a silhouette of that which we mistake for the
essence. Math is not the essence of consciousness or presence, it is the
essence of distance and absence.
Craig
Edgar
On Friday, February 28, 2014 5:34:10 PM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Friday, February 28, 2014 5
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 11:17:31 AM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 26 February 2014 12:58, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
The alien hand syndrome, as originally defined, was used to describe
cases involving anterior corpus callosal lesions producing
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 4:13:22 AM UTC-5, stathisp wrote:
On 26 February 2014 23:58, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
The alien hand syndrome, as originally defined, was used to describe
cases involving anterior corpus callosal lesions producing involuntary
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 9:47:33 AM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 27 February 2014 14:02, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
In other words, why, in a functionalist/materialist world would we need a
breakable program to keep telling us that our hand is not Alien? When
you
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 9:38:05 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 24 Feb 2014, at 17:31, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, February 24, 2014 9:13:26 AM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 24 February 2014 02:43, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
How do you turn your desire to move
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 12:52:41 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 25 Feb 2014, at 23:30, Craig Weinberg wrote:
0 doesn't = 0 in my theory.
Identity isn't self contained in MSR. All identity is leased within some
perspective. The more common the perspective, the longer the lease
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:03:15 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
On 28 February 2014 03:02, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
In other words, why, in a functionalist/materialist world would we need a
breakable program to keep telling us that our hand is not Alien
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 7:54:53 PM UTC-5, stathisp wrote:
On 28 February 2014 01:05, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 4:13:22 AM UTC-5, stathisp wrote:
On 26 February 2014 23:58, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote
The alien hand syndrome, as originally defined, was used to describe
cases involving anterior corpus callosal lesions producing involuntary
movement and a concomitant inability to distinguish the affected hand from
an examiner's hand when these were placed in the patient's unaffected
On Sunday, February 23, 2014 8:59:44 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
This seems vaguely akin to the discovery that most of the mass-energy of a
proton is the binding energy holding it together. If we found that the mass
of the quarks was also in fact binding energy we might end up with
something
On Monday, February 24, 2014 8:17:02 AM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 24 February 2014 03:38, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Sunday, February 23, 2014 7:22:36 PM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 23 February 2014 19:55, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote
, when
I suspect that is neither.
Craig
Edgar
On Sunday, February 23, 2014 9:55:27 AM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
This might be a more concise way of making my argument:
It is my claim that CTM has overlooked the necessity to describe the
method, mechanism, or arithmetic principle
Edgar
On Sunday, February 23, 2014 8:43:08 PM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, February 23, 2014 8:13:15 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
Craig,
Yes of course there can be motion or relations without an experience if
you mean a human experience.
No, I don't mean human
On Monday, February 24, 2014 9:21:15 AM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 24 February 2014 13:56, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Sure, but there is a difference between restoring damaged parts of a
living person's brain and putting parts synthetic brain parts
On Monday, February 24, 2014 9:13:26 AM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 24 February 2014 02:43, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
How do you turn your desire to move your hand into the neurological
changes which move them? The neurological change is the expression of what
, February 24, 2014 9:08:52 AM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, February 24, 2014 8:09:35 AM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
Craig,
How do you define experiential phenomena without invoking an observer
to experience them?
The same way that I would invoke 'material phenomena
On Monday, February 24, 2014 11:43:28 AM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 24 February 2014 16:01, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Monday, February 24, 2014 9:21:15 AM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 24 February 2014 13:56, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure
On Monday, February 24, 2014 9:03:30 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 23 Feb 2014, at 15:55, Craig Weinberg wrote:
This might be a more concise way of making my argument:
It is my claim that CTM has overlooked the necessity to describe the
method, mechanism, or arithmetic principle
On Monday, February 24, 2014 12:16:26 PM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 24 February 2014 16:59, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
You seem to be answering a different question. I thought it was a direct
entailment of your theory that no part of the brain could
On Monday, February 24, 2014 1:10:03 PM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 24 February 2014 17:38, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
No, that's the point of the analogy, so you can see for yourself why the
question is not reasonable. The question posed over and over to me
,
was it not? If it weren't for some counter-intuitive theories, it still
would be the norm.
Craig
Edgar
On Monday, February 24, 2014 11:52:17 AM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, February 24, 2014 10:56:08 AM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
Craig,
It's hard to understand how your view
On Monday, February 24, 2014 2:06:24 PM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-02-24 20:02 GMT+01:00 Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
:
On Monday, February 24, 2014 1:10:03 PM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 24 February 2014 17:38, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote
On Monday, February 24, 2014 3:11:47 PM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-02-24 20:24 GMT+01:00 Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
:
On Monday, February 24, 2014 2:06:24 PM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-02-24 20:02 GMT+01:00 Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com
On Monday, February 24, 2014 3:32:03 PM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 24 February 2014 16:31, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Monday, February 24, 2014 9:13:26 AM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 24 February 2014 02:43, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
How
On Sunday, February 23, 2014 12:53:00 AM UTC-5, stathisp wrote:
On Sunday, February 23, 2014, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Saturday, February 22, 2014 2:05:47 PM UTC-5, stathisp wrote:
On Saturday, February 22, 2014, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com
This might be a more concise way of making my argument:
It is my claim that CTM has overlooked the necessity to describe the
method, mechanism, or arithmetic principle by which computations are
encountered.
My hypothesis, drawn from both direct human experience as well as
experience with
On Sunday, February 23, 2014 10:48:57 AM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 23 February 2014 00:18, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
The body's recognition of foreign protein markers is a lower level
manifestation of the mismatch of higher level zoological history
On Sunday, February 23, 2014 10:35:33 AM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 23 February 2014 14:55, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
This might be a more concise way of making my argument:
It is my claim that CTM has overlooked the necessity to describe the
method
Can there be any motion or relation without an experience in which a sense
of motion or relation is literally encountered?
On Sunday, February 23, 2014 9:37:46 AM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
All,
Here's one more theory from my book on Reality:
All forms of mass and energy are just
that there are such beliefs out there is very popular. I'm
talking about physics and ontology, it has nothing to do with biology or
Homo sapiens.
Craig
Edgar
On Sunday, February 23, 2014 6:39:45 PM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Can there be any motion or relation without an experience in which
On Sunday, February 23, 2014 6:51:21 PM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 23 February 2014 19:04, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
After all, the standard objection to starting from the putative
universality of consciousness is why does it appear that so much
On Sunday, February 23, 2014 11:50:57 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 22 Feb 2014, at 18:36, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, February 22, 2014 11:27:45 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 22 Feb 2014, at 15:25, Craig Weinberg wrote:
If you say yes to the doctor, you are saying
On Sunday, February 23, 2014 7:22:36 PM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 23 February 2014 19:55, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Sunday, February 23, 2014 10:35:33 AM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 23 February 2014 14:55, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote
On Saturday, February 22, 2014 12:29:04 AM UTC-5, stathisp wrote:
On 20 February 2014 09:24, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
You're assuming that precise molecular assembly will necessarily yield
a
coherent dynamic process, but that may not be the case at all
If you say yes to the doctor, you are saying that originality is an
illusion and simulation is absolute. Arithmetic can do so many things, but
it can't do something that can only be done once. Think of consciousness as
not only that which can't be done more than once, it is that which cannot
On Saturday, February 22, 2014 9:34:08 AM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 22 February 2014 14:25, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
If you say yes to the doctor, you are saying that originality is an
illusion
Not an illusion, an invariant.
If it is invariant
On Saturday, February 22, 2014 11:27:45 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 22 Feb 2014, at 15:25, Craig Weinberg wrote:
If you say yes to the doctor, you are saying that originality is an
illusion
Not at all. Your 1p-originality is preserved all the time.
I'm not thinking of 1p
On Saturday, February 22, 2014 2:05:47 PM UTC-5, stathisp wrote:
On Saturday, February 22, 2014, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Saturday, February 22, 2014 12:29:04 AM UTC-5, stathisp wrote:
On 20 February 2014 09:24, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote
On Saturday, February 22, 2014 4:06:39 PM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 22 February 2014 15:09, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Saturday, February 22, 2014 9:34:08 AM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 22 February 2014 14:25, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote
On Saturday, February 22, 2014 8:49:33 PM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 23 February 2014 00:27, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Saturday, February 22, 2014 4:06:39 PM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 22 February 2014 15:09, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote
On Friday, February 21, 2014 10:28:47 AM UTC-5, David Nyman wrote:
On 20 February 2014 22:00, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
I'm still unsure whether you don't grasp the relevance of my point, or are
consciously or unconsciously side-stepping it. It's really peculiar
http://multisenserealism.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/flowchartfinal.jpg
http://multisenserealism.com/2014/02/20/philosophy-of-mind-flowchart/
The idea here is that if we want to take the full spectrum of phenomena
into account, we have to either begin with a reductionist realism and work
On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 10:42:48 PM UTC-5, chris peck wrote:
how can facts exist that are not grounded in observation at some point?
Russell and Liz are wandering around the countryside and Liz points at the
ground and says:
there's a gold coin buried right there.
Russell says:
101 - 200 of 3100 matches
Mail list logo
